►
From YouTube: 2021-12-09 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
It
has
some
kind
of
a
number
year
that
is
like
20.
Let
me
let
me
do
that
again:
it's
not
the
right
link.
There.
B
B
A
A
A
B
The
original
so
the
in
the
other
chat
there
is
no
one
or
just
fails
connecting.
A
No,
it
says
meeting
is
scheduled
for
jan
1
2099.
B
D
E
He's
gonna
look
into
it.
I
posted
a
posted
in
the
open,
telemetry
channel,
so
it
seems
like
there's
a
there's,
an
issue.
B
A
E
Yeah
morgan
is
saying
all
the
meetings
that
are
occurring
right
now
have
the
same
problem,
so
they
must
have
changed
something
with
the
meetings
or
something
I
don't
know.
B
Okay,
great
so.
F
B
So
can
you
share
it
yeah,
you
can
see
it
right.
E
B
I
will
copy
the
usual
suspects
here
and
yeah
I'll
leave
it
open,
because
I
am
very
positive.
Someone
more
will
join
later
so
last
meeting
actions
the
latest
version
released.
There
were
no
issues,
at
least
no
one
reported
any.
So
that's
good
and
also
automatic
context
handling.
I
merged
appear
this
morning
for
me
that
had
some
changes
it
doesn't
fix
everything.
B
But
I
think
it
solves
most
of
the
possible
scenarios
that
we
can
find,
because
I
am
cloning
the
for
for
each
task.
I
am
cloning,
cloning,
a
stack
of
different
contexts,
so
we
we
can
have
different
context
inside
the
same
task,
but
it's
acting
as
a
stack,
so
the
last
and
the
the
the
last
time
that
a
context
is
the
one
that
is
released.
B
So
if,
theoretically,
you
could
have
a
way
to
create
two
parallel,
two
parallel
running
contexts
or
two
running
spans
inside
a
task
which
I
think
is
not
possible.
B
Then
we
could
be
losing
the
context,
but
I
don't
think
you
can
run
in
parallel
code
inside
a
task
without
creating
another
task
which
would
copy
the
context
again
so
yeah.
So
I
created
a
a
stack
that
it's
value
based
object,
so
it
should
be
cloned
in
every
task
and
not
referencing
the
same
one,
and
also
added
some
there's
that
so
different
scenarios
that
you
have
mixed.
B
B
E
B
B
It's
gate.
It's
getting.
B
B
So
this
was
the
scenario
I
was
thinking
that
we
were
failing,
and
I
put
that
also
in
the
I
think
in
the
chat
in
the
channel
of
the
slack-
and
this
is
the
one
that
I
really
as
it
runs
it
detached
it
shouldn't
really
share
the
context,
so
it
really
should
fail
because
it
should
have
another.
It
should
have
no
parent
here
because
it
runs
detached.
B
Is
it's
not
detached
yeah,
that's
right
and
also
creating
this
asynchronous
path
here
and
checking
that
the
active
span
is
the
parent
span
before
running
inside
the
task
also
so
it
it
looks
like
somehow
I
I
don't
really
know
how
it
can
get
this
value.
So
I
I
I
must
investigate
why?
Because
it's
it's
something
that
is
top
full
strength.
B
I
don't
know
what
is
recovery
in
it
because
it
always
was
returning
zero
for
the
current.
Maybe
it's
saving
to
zero
when
it
starts
or
something
like
that
yeah
in
the
map
we
have
for
activity
but
yeah
as
it
was
working
in
several
scenarios.
B
B
Oh
yeah,
this
one
yeah-
this
is
a
spanish
word.
I
shouldn't
have
used.
This
is
next
time
I
just
translated
incorrectly,
so
it
creates
a
span
that
they
call
it.
The
span
outside
that
it's
created
here
inside
this
span
inside
this
task.
It
creates
another
async
span
in
with
that
they
call
expanding
site.
That
is
this
one,
so
it
creates
a
it
starts
in
a
task
because
the
on
test
is
a
synchronous.
So
it's
running
inside
the
task.
B
It
creates
a
task
inside
which
has
the
correct
parent,
because
it's
validated
here
that
the
parent
is
the
one
that
should
be
it
creates
another
one
which
also
checks
that
the
parent
is
the
this
outside.
So
that's
working
with
a
nested
tasks,
also
and
also
with
parallel
tasks.
We
have
here,
shooter
parallels
that
runs
concurrently
and
both
in
their
own
code
are
checking
that
the
parent
spam
is
the
one
that
launched
it
well
and
yeah.
So.
E
Yeah
I'm
just
I
was,
I
was
reading
up
on
all
the
async
tasks
stuff
and
I'm
trying
to
I'm
starting
to
understand
it.
But
in
this
async
task
twice
example,
you
have
here
the
two
awaits
they're,
not
actually
running
in
parallel,
they're
being
they're
being
run
or
not
concurrently,
they're
being
run
serially.
Aren't
they
because
you're
awaiting
both
of
them
you're
not
actually
asyncing
them.
E
So
so
it
I'm
just
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
way
it
would
actually
look
if
we,
if
we
were
to
graph
it
out,
you'd,
have
the
span.
One
would
look
like
this
and
then
within
span.
One
you'd
have
the
async
a
weight
one
and
then
async
await
two
right
and
then
it
would
still
be
within.
B
E
B
Yeah,
you
are
true
yeah.
E
Yeah
the
problem,
the
problem
with
all
this
is,
if
you
were
to
dispatch
it
just
in
terms
of
not
in
terms
of
like,
like
using
a
dispatch
queue
or
anything,
but
just
like
you
know,
separate
it
from
this
context,
you
would
still
have
to
wait
on
it
at
some
point
before
ending
the
test,
just
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
leave
like
things
hanging
around,
but
yeah.
B
Yes,
that's
right,
but
yeah
I
was
running
just
now.
They
did
that
version
that
one.
This
is
the
13th
one,
so
it
won't
run
this
code
yeah.
That's
your
two!
So.
B
Okay,
this
one
yeah,
because
I
have
opening
twice
yeah.
I
should
wait
for
both
true
because
that's
what
I
wanted
to
test,
but
I
think
it
should
work
but
yeah.
It
could
be
true,
and
maybe
it's
failing.
E
Yeah
I
I
I
wanted.
I
had
other
questions
about
the
the
task
task
test
that
you
had
as
well,
but
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
look
at
that
in
a
second.
E
Would
it
be
like
let
blah
like
let
almost
like
promise
or
something
equal,
async
or
yeah,
one
two.
B
Okay,
okay
and.
E
E
B
So
I
can
today.
B
E
B
Stuff
yeah:
I
want
to
just
be
sure
that
it's
not
leaking
the
click
in
the
the
context
between
the
internal
task
and
the
outside
that
you're
trying
so
await.
One.
E
E
E
E
B
F
E
E
Yeah
yeah,
if
you
go
back
down
to
the
task,
the
task,
one
yeah,
okay
yeah,
so
so
I
think
maybe
yeah
it's
kind
of
a
similar
issue
here.
So
is
the
goal
here
we
want
to
see.
We
create
a
task
from
a
span
and
it's
dispatched
separately.
E
So
we
want
it
to
still
show
as
the
parent,
but
that
task
is
running
outside
of
the
parent,
so
yeah
so
like
like
async,
and
then
you
have
the
the
task
running,
but
it's
but
it's
unbounded
by
the
by
the
parent
task
right
by
the
span.
One.
B
B
Yes,
there
is
yeah,
it's
running
another,
so
the
idea
is
starting
a
span
running
in
in
a
synchronous
way,
so
with
the
current
activity.
Logic,
yes,
and
after
that
run
another
span
that
runs
inside
the
task.
B
B
It
should
be
another,
it
should
not
be
related
to
the
parent
that
you
created.
E
Yeah-
that's
that's
fair,
but
don't
we
want
to
still
propagate
the
fact
that
that
task
was
created
by
the
parent
context
like
it
might
not
be
like
associated
temporally,
because
it
might
run
like
this.
The
parent
is
over
here
and
that
it
gets
run
like
sometime
afterwards,
but
we
still
want
to
know
that
they
were.
They
were
a
parent
child.
Don't
we.
B
Yes,
yes,
I
I
think
it
will
be.
It
will
be
great
if
we
could
do
that,
but
the
problem
is
that
I
was
expecting
that
both
this
and
this
would
fail.
D
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know
why
it's
why
this
is
working.
In
fact,
if
you
see
I
initially
started
with
the
expect
failure,
yeah,
because
I
thought
that
these
two
situations
or
these
two
ways
we're
going
to
fail
both.
I
don't
know
why
this
works
and
why
this
isn't.
So
I
don't
know
why
this
works
and
this
doesn't
work.
E
So
the
so
in
the
in
the
task.dispatch
span1
is
it's
not
available?
There's
no
there's
no
variable
capture
like
in
a
like
in
a
block.
B
It
shouldn't
be
catched
in
any
of
those
I
mean
because
it's
when
this
gets
the
current
context,
I
think
it
should
try
to
get
the
one
from
the
task,
because
when
you,
I
don't
know
when
you
get
the
active
context
manager
when
you
get
the
current
context
value,
if
you
are
inside
a
task,
what
I
had
found
was
that
you
always
were
getting
here:
an
identity
of
zero.
The.
B
E
Could
we
could
we
add
an
extension
to
the
task
to
on
like
initialization
or
something
check
the
context
and
maybe
prime
it
with
it?
So
when
it
creates.
B
We
can
extend,
we
can't
create
any
extensions
to
the
task.
Yeah,
that's
true,
and
that
could
be
useful,
very
useful.
That's
a
great
idea
cool
because
yeah
right
now,
it's.
E
Because
it
might
yeah,
it
might
be
better
because
you
can't,
because
there's
no
propagation,
because
it
has
like
a
totally
new
like
task
local,
like
environment,
we
might
have
to
prime
it
with
like
it's
like
here's,
where,
where
you
came
from
like
to
give
it
give
it
the
context
through
that,
instead
of
trying
to
look
at
the
the
task,
local
or
the
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense.
B
E
B
E
B
I
didn't
understand
why
it
was.
I
was
expecting
both
to
fail
yeah,
but
this
somehow
is
working,
so
I
really
must
investigate
how
it
why
it's
working,
maybe
it's
not
running,
detached
in
a
task.
Somehow
I
don't
know
why.
B
Yeah
it
could
be,
but
I
don't
know
why
maybe
it's
by
default,
but
it
should
be
marked
like
this
to
be
a
sync.
B
That's
yeah,
in
fact,
if
you,
if
you
are
running
here
in
a
nursing
test,.
E
B
B
B
B
You
cannot
wait,
it's
strange
yeah,
it's
yeah
it
it.
It's
really
a
strange
code,
yeah
also
the
way
they
have
to
handle
the
context
is
it's
really
weird
also
see.
B
So
yeah,
so
that
that's
I
will.
I
will
check
this
one
in
the
top
this
one
I
will
check
and
see
if
I
can
run
them
in
parallel.
So
the
test
is
what
I
really
wanted
to
test.
Yeah,
that's
a
really
good
point
and
about
these
yeah.
I
will
try
to
understand
why
this
works,
and
this
doesn't
work.
E
Yeah,
I'm
interested
in
in
a
way
to
propagate
the
the
source
context
of
a
of
a
dispatch
or
detached
task
as
well
to
like
maybe
I'll
see.
If
I
can't
like
fiddle
around
with
an
extension
or
something
to
make
that
work.
B
Yeah
with
an
extension,
you
should
have
access
to
some
yeah
inauds
of
the
task,
also
so
yeah.
Maybe
it
can
work
there
yeah,
it's
a
good
idea,
yeah
it's!
This
is
a
problem
that
it's
quite
difficult
to
solve,
with
tools
because
they
broke
activity,
because
if
they
have
kept
functionality
for
activity
and
they
just
transferred
activities
within
tasks,
I
don't
know
why
they
broke
that
it
will
continue
working
with
our
code,
which.
B
B
It's
a
very
old
thing
that
didn't
really
work
on
street.
Never
but
I
need
to,
but
you
could
create
activities
and
you
could
and
and
you
would
get
your
current
activity
and
your
parent
activity
is
it
group.
E
Is
that
it
oh
login.
D
E
C
E
So
bad
well,
yeah,
like
I'll
search
like
I
was
looking
for.
I
was
looking
for
information
on
the
the
mock
os
stuff
and
it's
just
so
hard
to
get
at
it.
It's
like,
okay,
you
have
to
know
where
it
is
to
find
it
like.
Their
search.
Functionality
will
not
show
where
it
is
like.
You
have.
B
B
B
B
C
B
Make
a
copy
append
and
make
a
copy
and
replace
the
current
or
remove
with
a
copy.
So
you
have
the
full
stack
in
its
task.
Yeah.
B
Done
if
you
want
expand,
you
don't
lose
the
parent
context,
at
least
so
that's
the
only
thing
I
could
find,
and
also
this
way
of
doing
things
is
undocumented.
B
With
this
name-
and
you
have
to
also
wrap
it,
this
way
to
be
mapped
here,
so
it's
something
very,
very
yeah,
very
obscure
I
found
in
the
forums
but
lets
you
do
something
with
these
values
from
outside.
That
is
something
that
you
couldn't
do
in
another
way
so
yeah.
I
think
we
we
we
need
to
understand
a
bit
better
this,
so
I
know
why
things
work
and
don't
work
exactly
because
I
still
have
some
some
areas
of
knowledge
that
I
that
are
escaping
from
so.
B
A
It's
manager,
yeah.
I
think
there
was
another.
There
was
an
issue
right
that
was
created
on
the
on
the
project
as
well.
So
what
is
the
you
know
if
a
customer
wants
to
use
cocoa
pods?
How
do
they
use
that
with
this
yeah
and
they.
A
B
They
they
have.
They
have
two
questions
about
that
and
we
had
that
in
in
our
issues.
Yeah,
it
was
that
yeah
we
depend
on
some
libraries
that
are
not
supported
by
cocoapods,
so
we
could
support
cocoapods
if
we
also
supported
this
libraries
for
cocoapods,
so
we
we
will
have
to
also
maintain
the
cocoapods
versions
of
the
libraries
that
we
are
using
like
the
swift,
atomics
libraries.
B
B
F
B
The
same
version
because
it
will
just
use
one
of
the
two:
you
are
using
the
same
version
or
compatible
versions.
Whatever
it
chooses
it,
will
it
won't
break
but
yeah.
That's
the
only
limitation,
you
if
you
have
a
dependency
of
of
a
third
library
that
uses
a
cocoapod
of
I
don't
know.
We
are
not
almost
not
using
libraries
but
imagine
yeah
a
penetration
library,
for
example,
that
we
use.
If
the
other
also
has
a
third
party
dependency
that
depends
on
penetration,
we
will
have
two
copies.
B
That's
the
only
limitation
that
I
find
that's
why
I
asked
on
the
github
issue.
What
was
I
I
don't
know
if
you
yeah?
I
saw
that
yeah.
What
is
the
use
case
right,
yeah?
What's
the
use
case,
what
what
is
their
limitation?
So
we
yeah.
We
should
support
that
because
it's
the
extra
extra
work
that,
if
it's
needed,
we
cannot
but
yeah
this.
This
one
is
like.
E
B
I
don't
think
it's
reasonable
enough
to
support
it.
I
mean
if
there
are
some
issues,
but
the
thing
is:
why
can't
you
just
have
one
library
in
spm
when
everyone
is
moving
to
spm
slowly,
but
moving
and
apple
is
only
releasing.
Some
libraries
in
in
spm
own
apple
is
not
releasing
some
libraries
in
cocoapods,
so
yeah,
it's
like
adding
extra
work
without
that
good
reason
is
not
something
I
like
to
do.
B
Yes,
it
can
handle
multiple
versions
and
go
inside
cocoapods,
yeah.
Okay,.
B
Have
some
version
yeah,
but
I
was
expecting
him
to
answer
me
something
about
the
issue
and
I
could
have
find
a
solution
or
maybe
he
did
with
the
comments
that
yeah
that
guy
provided.
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
really
needed,
they
can
do
that.
We
could
also
provide
binary
versions
of
the
library.
So
you
can,
you
can
distribute
that
binary
with
cocoapods,
for
example.
That's
another
option
so
yeah
I
was
asking
what
what
were
the
solutions
for
him
so
yeah,
but
I
don't
know,
for
example,
I
for
my
library
I
am.
B
For
my
sorry,
I
have
to
end
this
meeting
fastly
or
quickly.
Yeah
was,
I
am
releasing
a
binary
library
that
links
open,
telemetry
inside
it
and
I
am
releasing
in
cocoapods
but
using
xc
framework
with
my
library
and
cocoapods
sorry
xc
framework
with
my
library,
open,
telemetry
shift
and
other
dependencies
built
inside.
So
I
don't
have
to
distribute
source
code
or
that
stuff,
even
when
it's
open
source,
but
that's
a
faster
solution.
B
If
you
want
to
link
fast
and
you
want
to
avoid
compiling
third
party
code,
that
takes
usually
a
lot
of
time
but
yeah-
I
don't
know
there
are
several
solutions,
but
he
didn't
say
why
he
couldn't
use
it.
So,
let's
see
yeah
and
that
do
you
have
any
other
topic.
We
could
add
that
support,
but
I
don't
think
it
pays
at
least
without
a
good
reason.
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
don't
have
anything
else.
It
sounds
like
you
need
to
go
nacho.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
next
three
weeks
so
next
week
I'm
going
to
be
busy
with
elastic
stuff,
so
I
won't
be
here
and
then
I'm
going
to
be
on
vacation
for
two
weeks,
so
I'll
be
out
until
the
6th.
So
merry
christmas
and
happy
new
year.