►
From YouTube: August 2021 OpenZFS Leadership Meeting
Description
At this month's meeting we discussed: OpenZFS Conference call for presentations
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w2jv2XVYFmBVvG1EGf-9A5HBVsjAYoLIFZAnWHhV-BM/edit#
A
A
The
registration
is
now
open,
it's
free
again
and
the
call
for
presentations
is
open.
So
if
you've
been
working
with
zfs
doing
some
development
discovering
using
zfs
and
discovering
how
it
works
or
anything
else,
you
want
to
share
your
experience.
We'd
love
to
hear
about
it,
send
me
an
email
by
september
3rd,
so
you
have
about
two
a
little
more
than
two
weeks
to
get
your
presentation,
your
proposals
in
not
not
too
long,
so
put
it
on
the
top
of
your
to-do
list.
A
A
All
right:
well,
we
hope
to
have
a
few
presentations
about
the
zifes
on
object,
store
work
that
the
deflex
team
has
been
working
on.
Hopefully,
there'll
be
some
stuff
in
there.
That's
interesting,
even
if
you
have
no
need
of
zfs
on
object
store,
because
we've
kind
of
taken
some
taken.
Some
experiences
from
the
data
structures
and
algorithms
that
we
use
in
the
kernel
and
kind
of
redone,
a
bunch
of
them
for
other
aspects
of
the
object
store
and
the
cache
that's
used
with
it.
A
A
B
B
B
B
A
Well,
one
question
that
I
had
for
this
group
of
folks
was:
you
know
it's
been
a
few
months
since
we
added
the
additional
maintainers
for
the
project.
We
wanted
to
see
how
folks
feel
that's
going.
I
know
like
a
bunch
of
things
have
landed,
but
we
have
you
know
we
still
have
tons
of
outstanding
pr's.
So
I
guess
the
question
is
like:
are
pr
submitters
getting
the
feedback
that
they
need
to?
You
know,
get
their
work
integrated
or
you
know,
get
the
feedback
that
they
need.
B
B
A
A
D
D
A
B
A
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
agree,
I
mean,
I
think
that
we
could
definitely
do
better,
I'm
glad
that
things,
some
things
at
least
are
getting
in,
but
I
I
agree
that
some
of
these
long
stand
things
have
been
open
for
a
while
and
ready
for
review
for
a
while.
We
could
do
a
better
job
at
getting
those
getting
feedback
on
those
because
they
they
tend
to
fall
through
the
cracks.
You
know
when
they're,
not
on
the
first
page
anymore,
they're
just
sitting
there
and
they're.
A
You
know
surrounded
by
a
bunch
of
other
pr's
that
maybe
are
not
ready
for
review
and
and
so
they
may
get
lost.
So
we
could
definitely
do
better
at
that,
and
I
think
we
need.
We
need
everyone's
help
right.
We
need
people
the
if
you
are
submitters
reminding
reviewers
and
maintainers,
and
we
need
maintainers
reminding.
A
B
Well,
I
guess
kind
of
speaking
of
pushing
things
through
or
whatever
something
we
talked
about
last
month.
A
couple
of
these
I
thought
we've
talked
about
so
much.
I
thought
they
were
done
already,
but
we
talked
about
changing
some
of
the
defaults
like
enabling
lz4
compression
by
default
on
new
pools,
which
I
thought
we
agreed
on
like
two
years
ago
at
a
conference
and
then
it's
just
nobody's
ever
opened
a
pr
to
do
it.
B
Since
the
cases
where
you
need
nine,
you
know
you
need
nine,
so
you
could
set
it,
but
maybe
the
default
should
be
higher,
and
if
it
is,
then
that
means
the
the
zval
default,
probably
really
does
need
to
change,
and
then
how
do
we
communicate
with
users
about
changing
all?
You
know,
four,
pretty
major
defaults.
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
compression
defaulting
to
on
is
pretty
safe.
I
would
I
think
of
those
that
you
mentioned
the
default.
A
shift
feels
the
most
questionable
okay,
but
maybe
that's
just
because,
like
you
know
in
in
my
in
the
world
where
I
that
I'm
actually
operating
in
like
we
mostly
have
a
shift
nine
but
yeah,
I
mean
that
I
I
wouldn't
rule
it
out.
A
I
mean
it's,
you
know
it
is
supposed
to
be
automatically
detected.
I
would
say
like
if
there
was
a
way
to
say
if
we
can't
automatically
detect
it
then
default
it
to
4k
like
that,
would
make
sense.
But
but
saying
like
oh
the
disk
says
it
has
a
shift
9,
but
we're
just
going
to
use
a
shift.
12.
like
that
seems
potentially
not
great.
C
D
Yeah
on
on
on
freenus
and
trunas,
we
force
everything
to
4k
from
perspective
of
disk
replacement,
because
sometimes
some
customer
may
have
nine
but
then
has
to
migrate
to
12
just
by
disks.
From
that
perspective,
we
switch
it
to
12
quite
long
ago,
yeah
years
ago,
actually,
but
from
point
of
small
deployment
of
somebody's
laptop
or
from
point
of
space
efficiency.
Of
course,
a
shift.
Nine
is
much
better.
D
A
A
A
A
A
If,
if
folks
have
feedback
on
things
that
worked
or
didn't
work
that
they
didn't
give
last
year,
then
you
know
now
would
be
the
time
now.
Now
would
still
be
a
good
time
to
give
that,
if
you'd
like
to
see
something
happen
differently
with
in
terms
of
like
how
we
do
the
conference
around
the
conference,
the
technology
and
the
tools
and
stuff
seemed
like
people.
People
liked
the
like
zoom
breakout,
room,
socializing
aspect
of
it,
so
that
was
nice.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
could
probably
do
a
better
job
of
organizing
the
hackathon
than
we
did
last
year.
I
think
that's
always
kind
of
a
challenge
to
get
new
folks
involved
in
that
when
they're
just
coming,
you
know
they're
just
seeing
seeing
a
few
people's
faces
on
zoo
on
zoom,
it's
tough
to
pull
them
in.
A
So
maybe,
if,
if
you
have
some
topic
that
you're
interested
in
that
you'd
like
to
kind
of
pull
in
new
folks
and
maybe
educate
people
on,
I
think
that
those
kinds
of
things
would
be
great
for
the
hackathon,
where
we
can
have.
You
know,
expert,
led
sessions,
or
maybe
not
even
expert
but
like
sessions
led
by
somebody
who
can
who
can
kind
of
direct
other
people
and
help
them
get
started
and
kind
of
know
what
to
do.