►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting - 2019-09-10
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
A
A
A
So
yeah,
let's
get
things
started.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
movies
or
feedback
survey.
Efforts
to
the
open
G
of
our
nation
I
remove
the
label
for
this
one.
So
it
doesn't
pop
back
up
on
the
next
agenda,
because
I
need
to
have
a
couple
action
items
on
that,
and
then
we
can
go
back
to
the
agenda,
so
I'm
going
to
open
up
repo
and
move
some
some
things
over
and
such
but
bring
that
back
up
at
a
later
date,
so
moving
on
unless
anyone
wants
to
discuss
that
any
further.
A
C
A
A
C
E
C
A
If
I
side
there,
those
two
just
great
okay,
so
yeah
I
won't
move
on
and
we'll
come
back
to
those.
The
next
item
is
this
was
issued
to
96
specify
the
scope
of
sixty
votes
during
application
and
incubation
I
believe
that
I'm,
looking
at
the
notes
from
last
week
that
miles
was
going
to
at
the
pr2
to
add
some
guidance
to
some
of
this,
or
does
he
have
one
here
hang
on
was
that
cold
92
94
pour
request
to
94
was
merged.
We
need
acceptance,
criteria
to
graduation
criteria.
C
A
E
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
B
C
A
A
Sorry
I'll
also
mute
when
I
scold,
my
puppy,
so
I,
see
only
know
Devon
here
as
well:
okay,
so
Michael,
if
you'll,
if
you'll
PR,
something
that
will
directly
address
this
issue,
296.
C
I,
if
I'm
thinking
the
right
context,
I
was
asking
if
we
had
a
an
email
list
that
we
could
get
to
all
the
CPC
members
and
I
think
we
just
had
one
which
got
to
the
C
Pete.
The
voting
members
and
I
think
we
discussed
this
before
and
it
was
like.
Well,
we
didn't
really
have
anything
private
to
discuss
among
the
CPC
members,
but
in
in
terms
of
the
applications.
A
A
C
What
I
remember
in
terms
of
the
time
frame
is
in
some
of
the
issues
I
can't
remember.
Where
now
is
that
I
think
we
had
consensus
that
if
we
committed
to-
and
it
might
have
been
in
the
discussion
last
week
with
Toby
as
well,
and
if
he's
here,
he
can
correct
me,
but
was
that
as
if
we
committed
to
not
a
yes,
you
know
not
the
final
response,
but
to
communicate
on
a
regular
basis.
C
A
Yeah
I,
remember
that
do
we
do
we
want
to
decide
what
that
looks
like
right
now,
it's
a
starting
point
and
then
you
know
PR
that
that
in
and
move
from
there
that
sounds
good
to
me.
Then
again,
we
are,
you
know,
only
18
minutes
into
the
meeting,
we're
kind
of
at
the
last
sort
of
agenda
item.
So
we
can
talk
about
these
two
things
we
do
have
the
post
bootstrap.
A
A
C
A
G
A
Think
it
makes
sense,
I
think
it
makes
sense.
We
discussed
last
week
that
perhaps
someone
from
like
other
Brian
or
jewelry
or
someone
from
the
foundation
with
maybe
given
initial
response,
that
basically
your
application
has
been
accepted,
are
not
accepted.
We
received
your
application
and
you
know
someone
will
get
back
to
you
in
a
specified
timeframe
and
then
you
know
it'll
be
kind
of
ongoing
from
there.
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
lay
out
on
the
expected
timeline
per
se,
but
have
these
assurance
of
regular
communications,
I.
C
B
Think
it's
like
as
long
as
there's
you
know,
foundation
staff
support
from
program
management.
It's
not
too
much
to
ask,
and
it's
a
very
lovely
thing
to
be
able
to
reply
back
to
somebody
inside
24
hours
and
just
say:
hi.
You
know,
I
see
you
and
we
have
this
and
you
know
we
appreciate
it.
I
think
that
that
that
makes
people
feel
really
good.
I
love
for
us
to
commit
to
that
I.
Think
it's
great
is.
B
C
I
may
be
both
yes
like
because
it's
sort
of
nice
to
know
that
you
got
the
right,
email
or
whatever
her
and
then
I
agree
the
second
one,
but
it's
sort
of
like.
If
you
have
the
first
one,
you
might
relax
the
second
one
to
be
like
two
or
three
days
or
something
but
I,
don't
know.
If
you
think
you,
if
you
think
we
can
commit
to
a
day,
we
can
start
with
that,
and
then
you
know
see
if
it's
here's.
A
A
B
If
we
were,
if
we
were
trying
to
think
about
designing
like
what's
essentially
a
customer
service
response
right-
and
you
know
we're
saying
we're
gonna
get
back
to
these
folks
in
a
certain
period
of
time
we're
going
to
and
then
that
communication
should
be
about.
We
have
this,
we've
seen
it
and
here's
what's
happening
next
and
you
know
whew
I
think
we
were
talking
about
committing
to
some
schedule
like
not
letting
too
many
days
go
by
and
and
I
think.
That's,
maybe
that's
what
we're
we're
saying
it's
like.
B
C
C
B
C
A
A
B
Mean
I
do
really
like
the
idea
of
having
people
from
the
CPC
community
who
are
designated
as
like
mentors
or,
and
we
have
that
we
were
doing
a
foundation.
There
were
certain
folks
were
mentors
to
projects.
I
think
that
that
is
slightly
different,
though
from
having
somebody
who's
kind
of
helping
to
ensure
that
the
process
is
administered
and
completed.
You
know,
I,
think
I,
think
mentoring,
a
project
and
overseeing
the
process
to
completion
are
two
different
things
and
I.
To
what
extent
we
wanna.
B
E
C
Not
it's
not
strictly
why
it
could
be,
but
it's
like
I
think
what
I've
heard
described
is
more
about
here's.
Let's
make
sure
that
the
process
moves
forward
and
and
the
the
bits
that
need
to
get
happen
happen
I'm,
not
sure
that
that
necessarily
includes
that,
according
to
say,
here's
how
you
get
through
the
different
pieces
it
good
but
like
it
could.
C
C
And
this
the
champion
is,
like
the
you
know,
it's
like
yeah,
I'm,
I've.
Think
it's
a
great.
This
is
a
great
project
to
enter
and
I'll,
like
you
know,
advocate
on
behalf
of
that
and
then
the
other
one
is
like
okay,
yeah
there's
these
process
things.
The
people
who
understand
that
really
well
can
help
them
get
through
those
process.
Things.
B
B
Yeah-
and
maybe
you
know-
maybe
we
don't
want
to
say
we're
gonna
commit
to
to
providing
mentors
right
off
the
bat.
Maybe
it
is
just
process
chaperoning
and
then,
as
a
result
of
getting
our
first
few
projects
through
this
process,
we
learn
what
kind
of
support
they
would
appreciate,
maybe
in
the
form
of
additional
help
or
mentorship
or
whatever
right,
yeah
yeah.
C
That
makes
sense
that
the
formics
me
and
you
could
have
like
multiple
mentors
right,
but
we
they
won't
they.
You
know
they
may
be
more
on
request
from
the
application
manager
who
is
kind
of
like
okay.
This
has
been
waiting.
You
know,
have
we
finished
this
off
yet
or
is
it
moving
forward?
That
kind
of
things
I.
A
Am
if
I
may
I,
you
know
Michael
and
Jory
and
I
are
talking
a
lot.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
input
I
see
it
like
Timmy,
for
example,
Wilson
no
commented
on
the
silent
period,
which
maybe
we
should
also
come
back
to
just
get
clarity
on
that.
But
does
anyone
else
have
any
input
on
what
this
should
look
like
in
terms
of
champions
and
mentors.
C
A
C
I'm
I'm,
like
like
I,
don't
think
this
needs
to
be
a
forever
statement,
but
I
think
to
start
with
that
works.
I.
Think
that
makes
sense
to
me,
like
you
know,
I
think
we
need
to
start
with
ones.
We
think
are
a
good
fit
and
we
need
to
learn
as
we
go
through
the
first
few,
and
you
know
I
think
saying
that
it
for
it
to
procure
it
approach
for
the
first
few
that
come
in
we
need
to
have
a
champion,
makes
total
sense
to
me.
C
C
I
think
we
should
we
should
try
and
because
there's
an
issue
I
can't
remember
what
issue
it
is,
but
there
is
an
issue
which
discuss
I
think
the
one
that
miles
opened
around
a
champion.
We
need
to
maybe
comment
in
there.
That
says
this
is
the
discussion
we
had
in
the
CPC
meeting.
This
is
what
we'd
like
to
go.
You
know
the
group
who
was
there
would
like
to
do
this
going
for,
but
I
don't
think
the
person
who
was
advocating
on
for
some
of
the
other
options
is
here.
C
C
F
C
B
F
F
I
just
said,
I
would
push
back
a
little
bit
on
weekly.
You
know,
I
would
I
would
say
that
I'm,
probably
here
as
a
champion
right,
even
though
I'm
we're
not
applying
or
whatever
expresses
it,
but
I
think
that's
sort
of
the
role
I've
I've,
maybe
been
taking
and
I
feel
pretty
comfortable,
just
showing
up
randomly
and
I.
F
Don't
know
if
a
lot
of
other
maintained
errs
are
going
to
be
able
to
devote
more
time
if
they're
in
the
incubated,
like
that,
you
know
that
is
obviously
more
involved,
but
it
seems
to
me
like
setting
that
requirement
might
turn
away.
Some
people
who
are
like
well
I,
think
I
do
but
I'm
not
sure,
but.
C
F
A
Right
so
I
just
to
be
clear
once
I
think
that
I
I
want
to
make
sure,
especially
from
you
know
where,
where
you're
coming
from
there
would
be
a
champion
on
the
CPC
side
and
champion,
perhaps
a
lead
person
on
the
project
side
right.
So
this
champion
would
only
be
responsible
for
that
weekly
correspondence
that
we
agreed
to
previously.
That
would
come
from
the
CPC
during
an
application
process
that
we
would
just
want
to
keep
the
lines
of
communication
open.
Even
if
there
is
no
update,
you
would.
C
F
F
Well,
it
already
says
CPC
champion,
but
that
is
a
little
bit
misleading
right,
because
if
they're
applying
to
be
on
the
CPC,
then
it
sounds
like.
Maybe
that
means
the
person
who's
trying
to
push
for
joining
the
CPC
right
so
like
member
of
the
CPC
who's
willing
to
champion,
or
something
like
that
might
might
have
made
it
more
clear
to
me.
H
A
And,
and
maybe
if
we
identify
like
in
the
documentation
here
like
you
know
that
a
project
would
have
a
point
person,
then
it
would
be,
it
would
like
clarify
the
distinction
between
the
two
roles,
but
it
does
raise
another
question
around
the
champion.
Does
it
need
to
be
a
CPC
members?
Can
it
be
someone?
That's
not
a
member
I
assume
it
should
be
a
member,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
discussion.
I.
B
A
C
A
C
A
C
You
got
I
just
got
the
thing.
I
could
add.
There
was
like
help
the
application
manager
when
I
need
it.
So
the
application
manager
is
like
trying
to
get
this
through
the
process
and
making
sure
it
doesn't
stall,
but
the
champion
would
be
the
person
on
the
CPC
that
they
would
go
to
if
there
are
problems
that
need
help
working
through.
A
C
A
C
C
A
A
A
C
C
I'll,
take
the
I'll,
take
the
starting
point
that
we
in
the
PR
that
says
you
know
we'll
need
to
have
a
champion.
Who
will
do
these
things?
Otherwise,
I,
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
a
no,
but
I
think
it
means
that,
like
we
won't
say
yes,
yet
mm-hmm,
but
I'll
start
with
something
like
that.
I'm
sure
they'll
be
some
it'll
trigger
some
discussion
so
also.