►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting - Oct 1 2019
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
A
A
B
Yep
yeah,
and
just
in
general,
for
these
ones
they're.
The
reason
I
wanted
to
put
this
on
the
agenda
was
to
just
let
everybody
know.
If
you
do
have
your
questions
like
this,
then
you
can
certainly
ask
it.
Maybe
for
some
things
it
may
be
easier
just
to
send
them
directly
to
me
depending
upon
what
the
topic
is:
operations
that
open
jsf,
that
org.
A
C
B
Maybe
just
the
reason
I
wanted
to
bring
this
up
for
discussion
today
is
sometimes
maybe
it's
better
to
post
the
conclusions
versus
the
in-process
discussion
so
for
some
things,
they're
they're
also.
You
know
this
is
maybe
a
good
example
there's
some
things
which
maybe
need
advice
and
maybe
don't,
but
it
may
not
be
clear,
and
this
is
something
which
I've
been
discussing
earlier
this
week
with
Michael
as
well
in
the
case
where
somebody
doesn't
really
know
one
way
or
another.
You
can
definitely
ask,
and
you
know
the
answer.
B
Maybe
this
is
something
it
does
require
an
attorney,
or
this
is
something
doesn't
require
an
attorney.
It's
maybe
better
to
err
on
the
side
of
caution,
but
there
may
be
some
things
like
you
know
where,
for
example,
we're
not
dealing
with
the
legal
document
where
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
go
to
an
attorney,
but.
A
B
A
And
I
would
just
my
my
preference,
just
personally
would
is
if
we
actually
have
issues
cuz,
then,
if
somebody
searches
in
the
future,
we
can
find
it.
Oh
this.
This
was
already
answered
asked
and
it's
like.
Oh,
we
didn't
need
advice
or
there
was
it.
At
least
you
know
you
might
find
a
thread
that
lets.
You
know
the
question
was
asked
before
and
even
if
we
can't
publish
the
answer,
we
can
go
and
say:
we've
already
asked
this
and
find
it
or.
A
B
It's
just
more
poignant
process
that
you
know
this
is
we're
certainly
happy
to
take
these
questions
when,
when
that
makes
sense
to
take
the
questions-
and
there
may
be
cases
where
that's
you
know
something
that
doesn't
necessarily
need
an
attorney
on
it.
But
you
know
if
you
certainly
feel
free
to
ask
and
feel
free
to
surface
those
yeah.
A
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
administering
project
applications.
It's
number
three,
three
one!
Let
me
just
open
that
up
unless
whoever
open
tagged
it
for
the
agenda
wants
to
jump
in
you.
A
A
A
A
A
Now,
if
not
I
think
we'll
leave
it
on
the
agenda
until
we
have
miles
just
to
confirm
whether
or
not
he's
happy
removing
the
agenda
tag
or
not
okay,
so
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
issue,
which
is
clarify
whether
the
content
of
application
becomes
public.
If
project
is
approved,
this
is
number
327
and.
A
It
was
opened
by
Toby
and
let
me
just
check
and
toby
is
on
the
call
I
think
we
covered
that
by
you
had
a
suggestion
which
was
added
to
321.
Was
there
any
other
anything
else
you
want
to
discuss
or
bring
up
on
that
one
yeah.
C
I
mean
just
a
brief
point:
I
think
it's
actually
a
lot
easier
to
provide
that
you
know
room
for
sort
of
like
Chatham,
House
conversation
and
potentially
open
it
afterwards.
I
mean
I'm,
pretty
confident
that
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
get
the
application
that
I
am
and
I
submitted
to
be
open
as
a
second
step,
it's
way
easier
once
it's
written
people
are
much
more
comfortable
with
it.
Then,
if
it's
done,
you
know
if
it's
required
up
front.
So
you
know
that's
the
just.
What
I
wanted
to
add
to
it?
That.
A
A
C
D
A
D
D
A
Think
at
this
point
there
was
one
question
from
Myles
about
whether
we
needed
to
do
some
like
pre
checks
on
the
on
the
like
the
IP
and
stuff
to
be
to
be
transferred.
We
did
have.
We
did
to
have
some
discussion
at
the
board
level
on
Friday.
My
take
is
that
the
answer's?
No
to
that
question
so
really
I,
guess
I
just
need
to
close
the
loop
with
with
miles
and
make
sure
he's.
A
That
up
and
I
guess
that
looks
like
it
was
probably
closed
since
the
last,
since
the
meeting
agenda
was
generated.
Oh
no,
that's
sorry!
That's
the
wrong
number!
That's
the
one!
We
just
talked
about.
Okay
right!
Yes,
okay,
so
responsibility!
Just
security.
Disclosures
is
number
326.
Let
me
open
them.
A
A
C
A
Have
you
taken
a
look
at
all
at
what
that
the
security
ecosystem
has
been
doing?
Working
group
has
been
doing,
I
haven't
I'm,
afraid,
No,
okay,
because
I
think
it's
worth
us
looking
at.
That
saying.
Is
that
something
that
you
know?
How
does
that
relate
to
ecosystem
modules,
for
the
open,
JSF
I
think
Brian
might
have
even
mentioned
that
the
Linux
Foundation
acts
as
a
CNA
for
some,
or
am
I
imagining
that?
A
A
No
I,
don't
know
right,
I,
said
I.
Guess
he
mentioned
get
cup
github.
Does
that
work
in
in
the
the
security
working
group?
We
have
a
relationship
with
hacker
one
where
hacker
one?
Actually
you
know
the
reports
go
to
them.
They
do
some
initial
triage
if
we
think
it's
useful
to
have
something
across
the
open,
JSF
projects,
or
at
least
a
pattern
that
says
hey.
This
is
the
way
that
you
know
we
do
it.
We
also
use
hacker
one
in
the
node
project.
We
do
it.
A
We
do
wish
your
own
Seavey's,
because
we'd
set
that
up
hacker
won,
but
they
also
are
like
hacker.
One
will
help
you.
You
know
issue
those
as
well.
So
if
there
was
kind
of
interest
from
other
open
to
JSF
projects,
we
could
certainly
explore.
You
know
the
common
pattern
or
whether
something
centralized
makes
sense
or
whatever.
C
Okay,
well,
I,
don't
think
I'll
come
back
this
feedback,
maybe
in
like
in
a.
A
Few
weeks
about
this
sounds
good,
yeah
I
think
it's
all
sort
of
stinking
up,
maybe
getting
you
know
you,
together
with
the
open
with
the
security
working
group
and
I,
think
Sam's
sort
of
started.
The
discussion
of
like
and
we've
involved
a
few
of
the
people
like
MRSA
MRSA
in
to
see,
if
you
know
moving
it
up
or
whatever
makes
sense.
So
let's
sounds
like
things
with
making
the
discussion.
Let
the
discussion
run
for
a
little
while
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
it.
A
A
A
Think
if
I,
you
know,
agree
or
remember
our
conversations
before
the
comment
I
have
in
there
that
captures
what
what
I
remembered
any,
which
was.
We
didn't
think
we
were
comfortable
committing
to
a
specific
time,
but
we
agreed
to
commit
to
initial
response
in
48
hours
and
then
a
weekly
update,
which
is
what
we
captured
in
321
works.
A
A
A
A
It
was
discussed
at
the
board
level
and
and
the
the
response
I
think
I
can
bring
back.
Is
that
it
seems
like
the
current
budget
is
more
than
enough
to
cover.
What's
going
to
be
requested
based
on
past
experience
and
I?
Think
unless
people
have
specific
concerns
or
we
get
questions,
the
plan
might
just
be
that
you
know
we
can
move
forward
on
that.
D
D
D
A
Sure
so
I
guess
on
that
one,
it's
kind
of
like
you
know,
I
I
was
wondering
if
we
needed
to
get
an
increase
in
the
in
the
in
the
budget
line
item,
but
it
you
know
the
sense
I
get.
Is
that
it?
It's
don't
everybody
feels
and
is
comfortable
with.
What
we
have
is
enough
and
that,
if
it's
not
it
won't
be
a
problem.
A
And
I
guess
as
a
stage
three,
it's
probably
just
needs
to
then
be
taken
to
the
board,
for
you
know
if
we
think
it's
ready
as
a
as
an
actual
approval.
A
A
A
Think
we're
just
no
Brian
if
this
was
on
your
radar.
I.
Think
this
one
we're
just
asking
for
some
sort
of
documentation
that
says:
okay,
here's
how
you
you
request
legal
advice
and
in
fact
it
was
related
to
the
earlier
discussion
that
you
had
on
the
Hat
on
the
agenda.
In
terms
of
like
how
do
we
recommend
people
do
that?
Where.
A
C
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
E
B
A
A
B
F
B
A
general
that
general
issue
of
some
sort,
or,
if
you
have
a
you,
know
marketing
question
or
an
issue
that
you
need
to
raise.
You
know,
for
example,
if
there's
there's
a
you
know,
a
wildfire
on
the
horizon.
That
you
know
is
something
that
would
that
the
foundation
may
need
to
react.
You
or
the
CPC
may
need
to
react.
C
B
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
E
A
A
B
A
So
I
guess
in
that
case
it
would
be
just
a
matter
of
commenting
that
to
that
effect
in
the
issue
saying
we've
done.
We've
done
this
because
the
last
one
it
says
you
know,
removed
agenda
label
for
now
since
at
legal
review
and
tracked
on
our
boarding
project.
So
if
you
just
comment
in
saying
we've
done
what
we
think
we
we
need
to
do
should
be
ready
to
land
yeah
and
then
guess
the
only
question
we
got
lots
of
approvals.
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
Then
flipping
on
waiting
on
the
Foundation
Board,
a
project
directed
funding
I
know
that
one's
still
waiting
on
sort
of
a
larger
discussion.
/,
you
know,
suggestions,
suggested
direction.
So
I
don't
think
we
have
anything
to
move
that
one
forward.
The
other
one
was
the
update
or
moved
JSF
CLA
bought
two
new
foundation,
I
think
Brian.
You
know
the
latest
state
on
that.
One.
B
Yes,
I
couldn't
get
off
mute
again
yeah,
so
this
is
again
it's
another
one
where
we
need
the
board
to
fully
sign
off
on
the
CLA
document,
there's
one
member
which
is
still
wanting
to
do
some
additional
reviews
on
it.
So
we
weren't
quite
ready
to
approve
it
in
the
board
meeting
on
Friday.
Once
we
actually
have
the
CLA
text,
then
we'll
be
able
to
get
everybody
set
up
on
the
you
know,
on
the
replacement
for
CLA
bot.
A
A
G
Yeah
this
is
Christian
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we
had
opened
up
the
call
for
proposals
for
the
coop
summit
sessions,
and
so
I
will
personally
get
to
the
chat,
and
so
we
have
open
we've
publicly
announced
for
the
third
plus
chase
interactive
conference.
So
it
will
be
a
side
event
as
well
as
the
coda
learn
like
podium.
Some
of
you
know
which
going
to
try
a
new
format.
This
time
we
will
see
if
that's
going
to
work
out
the
core.
You
know
session
proposals,
there's
open
as
well.
G
We
hope
for
collaboration,
the
project
side,
as
well
as
from
the
attendees
so
yeah
that
I
wanted
to
go
out.
I
will
send
out
in
MLA
an
email
on
the
mailing
list
so
that
we
can
reach
out
to
all
of
the
projects
because
we
want
to
especially
for
this
summit.
We
want
that
every
project
is
being
evolved
and
have
you
know
at
that
time?
That's
it
yeah.
A
Is
there
any
sort
cut
off
I
know
in
the
past
you
know
people
have
submitted
fairly
late
and
we
haven't
necessarily
had
it
cut
off.
Is
there
anything
like
that,
this
time
or
is
or
is
it
please
start
now,
but
there's
no
drop?
You
know
there's
no
point
at
which
there's
not
a
date
that
we
need
to
make
before
in
order
to
get
something
in
for
the
summit
or
coded
continent,
I
guess
for
both
of
them.
It
would
be
good
to
mention.
If
there
is
a
particular
time
would
be
good
to
mention
them.
So.
G
No,
we
definitely
have
not
defined
a
cut-off.
We
just
you
know.
As
sooner
is
we
have
session
prepared
as
easier?
It
is
for
us
to
organize
everything.
So,
as
sooner
is
better
but
I
guess
we
can
be
straight
forward,
and
you
know
we
arrange
things
whenever
when
we
you
know
do
the
collapse,
I
mean
yeah.
A
D
A
Let
me
look
at
that
one,
so
we
do
have
quite
a
few
things
on
there.
So,
let's
start
with
blocked,
provide
guidance
on
how
to
refer
to
the
foundation
in
licensed
copyright
statements.
B
A
So
same
same
thing,
progress
being
made
but
still
blocked,
sorry,
I
guess,
while
I'm
thinking,
we
should
probably
update
the
templates
so
that
it
has
this
on
the
agenda
as
well,
because
it
does
seem
like
something
we
should
go
through
in
terms
of
the
doing.
There's
a
you
know,
a
few
of
the
onboarding
for
existing
projects.
Messageformat
hospital
run
mocha,
architect,
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
worth
going
through
each
of
those
individually
but
I,
don't
know
Brian.
If
there's
any
comments
things
to
bring
out
on
those.
A
A
B
E
F
Had
agreed
that
a
like
shirred
of
putting
a
banner
that's
just
static
on
every
website,
you're
not
gonna,
find
success
that,
like
prescribing
something
and
I,
also
know
that
you
know
now.
Such
a
banner
would
break
the
design,
aesthetic,
an
approach
of
a
lot
of
the
websites
and
I'd
rather
not
enforce,
like
a
certain
design
style
on
any
of
the
websites.
Yeah.
E
Exactly
that's,
that's
gonna.
The
idea
was
we
were
trying
to
put
together
a
banner
and
after
looking
at
even
just
two
or
three
sites,
it
was
obvious
that
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
going
to
work
universally,
so
I
think
we
kind
of
gave
me
the
conclusion
that
it
might
be
better
just
to
provide
sort
of
what
should
be
displayed
on
a
website
in
terms
of
like
logo
or
then
you
notice
is
there
anything,
but
leave
it
up
to
the
projects
to
determine
how
it
fits
into
their
design.
A
A
A
Says:
review
onboarding
checklist,
C
262,
if
identified,
we
need
a
spark
information,
relator
infrastructure,
personal
contact
information.
We
should
probably
don't
want
to
display
publicly
or
we
want
to
have
certain
rules
to
have
access
to
that.
Brian
suggests
this
could
be
a
private
repo
or
something
like
that
right.
A
A
Okay
think
then,
the
last
one
is
asked
projects
to
start
updating
references
to
Docs
and
CPC
repo
I
think
that
one
was
generally
waiting
on.
You
know
having
a
few
of
the
first
projects
get
through
the
onboarding
before
we
would
make
the
broader
request
and
Ivan
I
don't
know
if
anything's
changed
on
that
front.
Anybody
have
any
thoughts
comments
in
terms
of
that.