►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Great,
I
assume
that
we're
live
when
the
little
thing
comes
up
there.
So
yeah
thanks
everybody
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
we
meet
every
other
week
now
and
you
are
working
sessions
on
the
off
week.
Thank
you
for
joining
everybody,
and
do
we
have
any
announcements?
I
mean
I
say
that,
but
I
have
a
whole
list
of
things.
A
So
maybe
I'll
start
and
then
we
can
see
if
I
missed
anything-
and
I
actually
have
them
written
down
as
notes,
so
I
will
drop
them
in
the
notes
here.
Oh
wow,
okay,
that's
that's!
Probably
fine,
all
right
cool,
so
announcements!
First
of
all,
you
know
we're
thinking
about
everyone
on
with
regards
to
the
storms
across
the
u.s.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
are
affected
and
power
out
and
everything.
A
So
you
know
I
hope,
everybody's
doing
okay,
yeah
next
up
on
my
list
here
is
the
standards
working
group
is
having
conversations
with
projects
to
weigh
in
on
the
work
we're
doing.
We
still
want
to
hear
from
all
projects.
So
if
you
haven't
already
or
if
you
want
to
continue,
please
reach
out
to
us.
A
A
The
marketing
meeting
is
canceled.
Today,
fyi
webdriver
recently
had
a
version
7
update.
I
don't
know
how
long
that
was
ago.
So
forgive
me
if
that's
a
little
delayed,
but
congratulations
to
them
as
well.
Ajv
js
had
a
version
7
release
as
well,
so
congratulations
to
them
pap
enters
emeritus
status.
Is
that
even
how
you
say
it?
I
don't
think
I've
ever
said
that
out
loud.
Is
it
pep
or
pep?
I
assume
it's
pep.
A
They
moved
to
emeritus,
which
is
something
we'll
actually
talk
about
today.
I
think
that's
on
the
agenda.
A
Oh
and
thanks
for
fixing
that
that
that
yeah,
sorry,
I'm
looking
at
the
notes
here,
the
openjs
world
cfp
has
been
extended
to
february
22nd,
which
really
helps
me
because
I
haven't
submitted
any
talks
yet
so
so.
Thank
you.
Oh
wow.
Those
are
all
url
defense,
okay,
I'll
fix
all
those
urls.
If
somebody
wants
to
delete
them
or
whatever
I
can
fix
them
all.
Where
was
I
speaking
of
the
cfp?
A
We
will
be
looking
for
help
reviewing
the
cfps
so
the
proposal,
so
if
anybody
is
interested
in
helping
that
would
be
great,
you
can
reach
out
to
me
or
jory
or
robin
rachel,
any
other
folks
involved
in
the
program
committee.
That
would
be
great.
A
We
did
a
ama
on
the
cfp
and
and
the
the
the
program
committee's
work
and
the
event
and
stuff.
So
if
you
have
any
interest
in
that
there's
a
replay
there,
I
added
this
too,
I
don't
know
has
any.
Is
the
bloomberg
membership
stuff
been
talked
about
at
all
in
this
meeting?
A
I
don't
recall
it
being
talked
about,
but
they're
now
a
member.
So
that's
great.
What
what's?
Where
did
they
come
in
at.
B
A
Great,
so
welcome
bloomberg.
Folks,
it's
really
great
to
have
you
all
and
then
finally,
I'm
I'm.
You
know
happy
to
announce
that
I'll,
albeit
a
week
late.
Sarah
won
the
board
director
election,
thanks,
of
course,
to
toby
and
sarah.
For
for
volunteering,
I
think
either
way
we
would
be.
You
know
really
well
represented,
and
so
I
appreciate
both
of
them
stepping
up,
but
sarah,
you
know
won.
So
congratulations
to
sarah.
I
pinged
her.
A
She
does
not
seem
to
be
online,
but
I
congratulate
her
nonetheless,
and
I
let
her
know
so
she's
aware
I
also
updated
the
the
issue
with
the
announcements
a
couple
minutes
before
this
meeting
so
so
yeah
we
have
a
new
director
which
is
exciting
yeah,
it's
great
that
was,
and
that
was
kind
of
that
was
besides
my
being
a
week
late.
My
brain
is
mush.
I
think
that
was
a
smooth
election.
I
feel
like
we.
A
A
That
is
my
long
list
of
announcements.
I
apologize,
but
I
got
through
them.
So
thank
you.
Did
I
miss
anything.
A
Great
cool
anything
else,
you
know
the
board
or
anything
that
we
need
to
bring
up.
C
C
A
Great-
and
I
don't
know
michael
if
you
can
reach
out
to
sarah
or
we
can
have
chris,
anyone
can
like
help
onboard
her
or
anything.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
any
sort
of
process.
B
C
B
I'll
reach
out
to
her
and
I've
done
onboarding
with
new
folks
as
well
as
todd
moore
our
board
president,
so
we'll
reach
out
to
her
as
well.
A
Great
great
yeah
I
just
want
to
make
sure
she's
has
everything
she
needs
to
hit
the
ground
running
and
be
successful.
A
Excuse
me.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
criteria
to
move
a
project
to
emeritus.
Some
discussion
was
born
out
of
the
announcements.
A
The
project
progression
document
says
that
there
should
be
a
two-thirds
vote
which
in
this
instance
seems
like.
Maybe
it
would
have
been
more
than
what
would
have
been
needed.
I
mean
just
you
know,
thinking
about
the
process,
so
there
are
some
comments
here.
Emily
you
have,
I
think,
a
good
suggestion
here
if
you
want
to
share
any
thoughts,
so
just
in
brief.
D
Rather
than
requiring
two-thirds
vote
when
okay,
so
we
have
two
different
cases
to
consider,
one
is
when
we
do
have
still
active
leadership
on
the
project
and
one
when
we
do
not
and
for
when.
We
do
not
have
active
leadership
on
the
project.
I
think
the
current
situation
of
requiring
the
two-thirds
vote
or
enabling
a
two-thirds
vote
of
the
cpc
to
allow
a
project
to
be
considered
america's
is
entirely
valid
and
proper.
D
But
for
the
case,
what
the
project
leadership
is
is
asking.
It
is
active
and
it
is
asking
for
it.
I
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
to
require,
in
that
case
the
two-thirds
vote,
but
rather
just
require
consent
of
pc.
All
that
action.
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
kind
of
like
I.
I
keep
approaching
this
question
with
from
different
angles
and
from
one
angle,
of
course,
if
the
project
leadership
is
done
with
the
project,
they
should
be
able
to
just
summarily
do
that,
and
the
only
involvement
with
the
foundation
should
just
be
making
sure
that
it's
unsettled
responsibly
right.
However,
one
of
the
huge
benefits
and
selling
like
selling
points
of
a
foundation
is
succession
and
ensuring
that
projects
survive
after
the
maintainers
are
done.
E
So
if
the
maintainers
are
done,
but
there's
others
interested
in
carrying
on
the
project,
the
maintainers
should
shouldn't
be
able
to
kill
a
project
that
the
community
still
wants
or
that
people
other
people
still
want
to.
You
know
take
over,
however,
absent
of
foundation
and
open
source.
Usually
this
the
answer
here
is
just
make
a
new
project
with
a
new
name
and
like
deal
with
it
and
then
like
and
fork
it
and
that's
fine
too
so,
there's
like
I
don't
know.
E
I
can't
come
up
with
a
prescriptive
process
in
any
direction
that
I
think
satisfies.
All
of
you
know
the
possible
angles
that
I'm
you
know
the
three
I've
mentioned
plus
I'm
sure
there's
many
others,
but
it
doesn't
feel
right
to
require
a
two-thirds
vote
also
so
I'm
kind
of
like
I'm
just
conflicted,
because
it's
similarly
doesn't
feel
right
to
just
say:
maintainers
can
just
do
it.
A
Yeah
that
makes
sense
that
makes
sense.
Toby
you've
got
something.
F
Yeah,
no,
I
just
believe
that
it's
probably
simpler
just
to
do
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
actually
have
a
conversation
about
it
when
it
shows
up
rather
than
trying
to
organize
the
thing
beforehand,
and
so
I
would
suggest
that
the
cpc
should
actually
have
a
vote.
For
that
reason,
even
if
that
vote
is
essentially
rubber,
stamping
what
the
project
has
decided.
A
F
F
F
Don't
care
about
the
difference
between
these
things
and
I
frankly
don't
think
that
they
matter
actually,
I
think
we
should
be
striving
for
consensus-driven
of
decision-making
as
often
as
we
can-
and
I
think
this
is,
I
think,
a
lot
of
the
cases
we're
asking
for
two-thirds
of
votes.
We
should
probably
move
to
consensus
driven
so
but
that's
a
separate
conversation
right
so
either
like
it
doesn't
matter.
I
don't
think
it
effectively
matters
to
whatever
people
are
comfortable
with
I'm
happy
with,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
have
up
front.
F
Think
of
different
paths
up
front
and
like
try
to
figure
out
every
corner
case,
because
we
won't-
and
it's
just
going
to
be
a
waste
of
time
now
and
there's
not.
This
is
going
to
happen
like
twice
a
year.
Oh,
so
I
think
we
can
do
that
and
build.
So
if
we
want
to
be
fair
built,
like
you
know,
revert
back
to
how
we
did
this
last
time
like
I
don't
think
we
should
be
spending
too
much
time
on
that.
C
D
I
think
it
might
be
good
at
the
point
when
a
project
is
is
seeking
to
enter
emeritus
or,
however,
you
pronounce
that
to
to
also
consider
at
least
asking
for
granting
the
the
openjs
foundation
admin
access
to
the
resources
of
that
project,
so
that,
if
something
does
need
to
later
be
done
with
the
project,
it's
not
a
situation
where
the
the
open
js
foundation
is
unable
to
do
a
thing,
because
the
the
developers
are
no
longer
really
around
and
it's
an
unmaintained
project
which
is
likely
to
happen
with
emeritus
projects.
B
We
already
do
have
access
to
resources
from
an
understanding
of
the
infrastructure
to
the
domains
and
all
the
ip
things
around
that.
But,
of
course,
you
know.
B
D
Yeah,
so
so
what
I'm
asking
is
is
asking
for
admin
access
to
the
to
the
repos
and
also
asking
admin
access
to
any
npm
packages,
for
instance,
that
those
projects
have
that
sort
of
assets.
C
C
D
F
Like
I,
I
don't
think
like
the
feeling
of
the
cpc
is
that
you
are
not
doing
your
job.
The
the
feeling
of
the
the
cpc
is
that
this
seems
like
an
area.
We
should
have
visibility
into
when
we
just
like
realized
that
we
didn't,
and
so
it's
kind
of
weird.
A
E
Yeah,
the
other
thing
is
I've
in
there
have
been
times
not
this
time
when
maintainers
have
decided
to
deprecate
their
libraries,
because
they
believe
that
it's
no
longer
applicable
to
the
ecosystem,
and
that
is
not
a
universally
held
opinion
and
like,
although
in
this
case
it's
fine.
D
And
in
particular,
being
able
to
do
that
not
only
to
sort
of
reverse
a
project
going
into
emeritus,
but
also
if,
if
it
comes
up
afterwards,
so
a
project
goes
into
emeritus
and
a
year
later,
somebody
realizes
that.
Actually,
this
is
still
a
thing
that
needs
to
be
alive
to
be
able
to
for
us
to
have
the
facility
to
effectively
be
able
to
make
that.
A
Happen
all
right.
Well
that
all
makes
sense.
What
are
what
what
what
do
we
have
like
action
items
out
of
this?
That
we
want
to
do
you
know
update.
Maybe
the
language
and
the
project
progression
create
an
off-boarding
checklist.
A
D
A
Great
well,
I
think,
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
to
create
an
issue
for
just
an
off-boarding
checklist
just
to
track
that,
and
then
you
know
what
this
this
pr
can.
This
issue
can
close
with
emily's
pr
at
a
minimum.
A
Makes
sense
cool
if
anybody
can
make
a
quick
issue
that
would
be
great
I'll.
Follow
the
issue
excellent,
I
will
move
on.
C
Yeah,
so
I
don't
know,
if
there's
any
more
comments
in
there,
let
me
just
take
a
look,
but
basically
all
you
know
they're
all
renamed.
I
don't
think
any.
I
haven't
heard
anybody
noticing
anything
yet
so
that's
good
the
thing.
F
C
C
C
A
C
A
Yeah
yeah,
you
might
have
to
kind
of
mentally
filter
through
some
things,
but
it
might,
it
might
be
a
low
barrier
kind
of
way
to
just
pop
through
and
see
anything
okay
cool,
and
then
we
had
talked
about
like
capturing
any
learnings
or
any
advice
or
anything.
I
have
the
hack
md
file
on
there,
but
I
don't
know
if
there's
really
much
to
share.
A
C
C
A
Cool
all
right:
well,
thanks
everybody
for
working
on
that
next
item
here
on
the
agenda,
so
they'll
open
this.
I
think
this
was
yeah
from
a
discussion
on
the
openjs
world
planning
about
creating
a
new
twitch
channel
for
open
the
open.js
foundation.
G
A
Don't
have
a
big
opinion
on
this:
what's
gonna
go
in
that
twitch
channel
or
I
think
like
amas
would
make
sense.
I
think
maybe
this
was
even
born
out
of
the
idea
of
like
watch
parties
and
stuff
around
the
event
itself,
which
we
could
lean
on
sponsors.
You
know
sponsors
to
help
with
that
as
well.
Who
may
already
have
some
following,
so
I
don't
know
because
I
know
just
having
a
twitch
channel.
A
You
know
it
takes
some
effort
to
get.
You
know,
people
there
and
consistent
content
and
everything.
I
think
we
would
have
good
stuff.
I
just
don't
know
if
it's
regular
enough
that
that
a
lot
of
people
would
start
to
follow
their.
A
Yeah
it's
a
streaming
platform.
It
was
kind
of
really
achieved
a
lot
of
popularity
through
like
gamers,
but
there's
a
lot
of
tech
content
on
there.
These
days,
too,.
G
G
Sorry
yeah
and
the
idea
is
like
to
build
an
audience
around
it
and
then
probably
we
can
use
that
for
the
conferences
and
amas
to
build.
The
anterior
ends
around
it,
because,
if
you're
doing
amaze
on
youtube
and
things
like
that,
it's
not
completely
work
out,
but
in
which
you
have
this
platform
ready
and
you
can
use
that
platform,
and
we
could
also
extensively
use
that
for
some
coding
and
stuff,
like
that.
The
only
problem
that
we
have
is
what
joe
mentioned
is.
Basically,
we
need
to
build
if
you're
going
to
build
an
audience.
C
So
I
don't
know
robin
since
rachel's.
Not
here
might
if
you
know
whether,
like
is
it
something
that
we're
strategically
going
to
be
looking
at,
I
think
you
know
we're.
We
were
working
to
try
and
build
the
youtube
views
along
with
the
other
channels.
I'm
just
wondering
if
this
is
one
of
the
things
that's
been
considered,
discussed
or.
B
Yeah
I
mean
the
youtube
has
been
great
for
delivering
content,
but
the
interaction
and
engagement
on
the
channel
itself
has
not
been
as
robust
as,
for
example,
a
twitch
channel.
So
again
we
thought
about
it.
Initially,
we
thought
perhaps
for
coding
workshops,
but
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
have
some
email
entry
into
that
just
to
sort
of
set
the
number
of
participants,
but
the
view
parties
would
be
cool.
B
I
I
think
our
the
only
concern
is
you
do
need
to
build
up
a
community
and
we
may
not
have
the
resources
to
do
that.
So
if
we
did
watch
parties,
alternatively,
we
could
rely
on
some
of
the
twitch
channels
from
you
all
right.
You
have
developer
twitch
channels
and
you
may
want
to
adopt
a
a
region
or
a
country
and
host
a
watch
party.
That
would
be
another
good
option,
so
we
just
wanted
to
see
if
this
was
something
that
you
all
thought
would
be
great
for
us
to
build
up.
I
I
would
also
recommend
not
doing
a
split
stream
to
youtube
and
twitch
it.
It
ends
up
creating
a
split
in
viewership
that
doesn't
actually
engage
the
audience,
which
means,
then
you
don't
get.
You
don't
get
growth
on
the
channel
and
you
don't
get
engaged
in
a
meaningful
way,
which
then
doesn't
actually
lead
to
being
an
effective
platform.
B
I
I
I
think,
if,
if
it's
something
we
want
to,
do
it's
something
that
we
need
to
have
a
lot
of
people
be
like
multiple
people
being
willing
to
weekly,
do
content
on
it,
and
I
I
just
knowing
how
much
how
stretched
we
all
are
already.
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that,
like
from
the
outset,
I
can
imagine
us
succeeding
within
the
long
term
just
because
of
how
how
engaged
we
all
are
in
different
areas.
Already.
A
A
In
fact,
now
I'm
getting
this
weird
monkey
in
the
chat
bar
that
says
something
went
wrong
so,
like
I
don't
think
I
haven't
gotten
anything
out
of
the
youtube
live
stream
aspect,
but
we
do
have
meetings
pretty
much
every
week
a
couple
times
a
week
in
terms
of
the
the
working
groups
and
the
cpc
you
know,
I
I
guess
a
consideration
could
be
to
just
switch
to
twitch
and
then
archive
the
videos
on
youtube
for
later
and
then
see
if
we
get
any
engagement
on
twitch.
That
way.
I
I
I
I
will
be
very
upfront,
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
be
an
engaging
piece
of
content
for
twitch,
like
that.
That's
that
is
us,
like
you
know,
we're
all
talking
to
each
other,
and
I
know
certain
folks
try
to
pay
attention
to
like
the
the
chat
on
youtube.
We've
never
really
got
an
engagement
on
youtube
and
honestly,
there's
like
thinking
about
like
watching
it
myself.
I
I
don't
know
what
I
would
engage
with
like
there's,
nothing
really
to
engage
with
as
an
audience
member
in
this
that
I
wouldn't
just
come
and
join
the
meeting
because
you
can
any
like
we
relatively
have
these
open.
So
I
I
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
be
like
an
engaging
piece
of
content-
and
I
mean
even
you
know,
the
views
on
like
the
node
streams
historically
have
been
like
it's
basically
bots
watching
it.
I
I
C
E
I
Will
they
will
view
it
as
it
goes
up
like
it
will
be
early
on,
and
then
it
will
die
out
so
that
that
I
mean
that's
also
just
gonna
be
how
their
their
algorithm
works.
But
that's
like
we're
not
gonna,
be
getting.
You
know
people
watching
the
full
video
from
that.
If
that
were
the
case,
and
if
that
were
something
that
people
were
actively
interested
in,
that
those
views
would
have
gone
up
over
time
from
being
a
consistent
like
if
you
have
a
consistent
number
on
youtube,
that's
not
getting
actual
views.
F
Yeah
wow
I
mean
I,
I
must
say
that
I
tried
to
follow
a
couple
of
times
the
board
meetings
on
the
recording
and
it's
like
the
most
boring
thing
ever,
I'm
sorry,
but
if
you
can't
be
part
of
it,
it's
horrible.
B
D
I
Thank
you.
Whoever
was
yeah.
I
I.
I
think
that
you
know
over
time
that
the
node,
if
node,
was
getting
consistent
views.
Then
we
like
the
platform,
the
platform
would
have
grown
and
it
hasn't
and
like
I've,
you
know,
thought
that
for
years
and
I'm
not
particularly
concerned
about
it,
like,
I
think
it's
a
great
tool
for
us
to
have
every
single
meeting
archived
like
that's
excellent
and
we
can
go
back
and
refer
to
things
we
talked
about
five
years
ago,
but
yeah
like
I.
I
I
I
don't
think
that
that
changes,
how
we
should
approach
this,
but
I
also
think
that
it
is
a
good
good
sign
that
twitch
is
not
a
place
to
stream
working
working
group
meetings
and,
like
I'm,
I'm
talking
to
node.
Just
because
that's
been
my
experience
and
it's
also
like
the
a
lot
of
how
the
open
data
foundation
and
how
like
working
groups
and
stuff
work
is
like
similar.
So
there's
going
to
be
parallels
there,
which
is
why
I'm
bringing
up
nodes
specifically.
A
A
D
Of
echo,
okay,
sorry
so
we've
talked
about
how
the
the
the
board
meetings
or
the
cpc
meetings
are
effectively
boring
content
for
outsiders.
But
how
about
the
amas?
Are
we
tracking
what
sort
of
engagement
we're
getting
on
those
on
on
youtube
and
and
because
that's
really
the
concept
that
I
understood
that
we
were
talking
about
originally
about
possibly
moving
to
twitch.
B
The
amas
in
real
time
have
a
few
viewers,
but
where
we
really
get
the
audience
is
when
we
do
a
time
stamp,
video
blog.
So
it
makes
it
easy
for
those
in
different
time
zones
in
the
world
to
watch
it
at
their
own
pace
and
skip
to
the
pieces
most
important
to
them.
So
in
real
time,
not
as
much
but
they've
been
popular
after
after
they
air.
B
B
B
Content-
and
so
we
talk,
we
do
split
eyeballs
a
little
bit
too.
We
get
a
blog
out
of
that.
So
we'll
have
measurements
on
the
blog
and
on
youtube
on
the
ama.
A
There's
in
the
notes,
there's
a
link
to
at
least
the
recent
cfp
ama.
C
A
C
Let's
all
the
way
sec
now
I
found
some
so
yeah.
Here's
a
few
like
you
know,
600
400
kind
of
views
for
the
amas
is
what
I'm
seeing
here.
C
We
see
the
same
for
some
of
the
the
meeting
recordings
as
well.
So
it's
like
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
say
we
should
you
know
we
should
ignore
those
like
some
of
them
are
like
40
and
some
of
them
are
500,
so
I
think
unless
the
bots
can
figure
out
which
ones
they
like
or
not,
it
does
seem
like
there's
more
views
of
some
for
sure.
B
G
Can
we
talk
to
you
again
whether
they
are
interested
in
doing
something
like
this?
If
we
have
someone
interested
in
the
projects,
if
multiple
projects
are
interested
do
something
like
this,
then
we
could
schedule
them
and
then
try
to
put
them
in
an
order
and
then
have
a
weekly
content
or
something
like
that.
Just
try
it
out.
B
I
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
fine,
to
ask
the
projects.
I
I
think
like
I,
I
would
love
to
see
us
do
that.
I
think
just
making
sure
that,
like
we
need
to
have
a
commitment
to
do
it
and
not
be
like
you
know,
I
I
think
we
all
understand
that
at
this
point
yeah,
I
think
that's.
The
thing
is
like
we
would
want
to
get
a
commitment.
A
I
think
it's
worth
discussing
in
the
marketing
meeting
and
the
program
will
be
meeting
further
and
we
can
go
from
there
cool
all
right.
Moving
on
next
item
in
the
agenda
is
the
cpc
director
election
again.
Thank
you,
toby
and
congratulations.
Sarah!
I
will
move
on
as
we
have
15
minutes
and
there's
not
much
else
to
talk
about
there.
Next
up
is
improving
diversity
and
inclusion
at
the
openjs
foundation
issue,
6.99
toby,
you
were
taking
notes
and
stuff
last
week
and
kind
of
driving
things.
A
Do
you
have
any
thing
you
want
to
share
here
on
this.
F
I
really
didn't
didn't,
prepare
anything
and
I
need
to
link
the
notes.
I
think
sarah
and
I
have
yeah,
I
think,
actually
what
I
can
share
is.
We
have
decided,
as
a
group,
to
start
by
surveying.
F
The
idea
is
to
start
by
surveying
the
cpc
members
to
see
how
we
feel
about
this
as
the
cbc
and
so
sarah
and
I
are
going
to
prepare
a
set
of
questions
based
on
what
stack
overflow
uses
for
its
the
surveys
that
it
creates
every
year,
and
we
will
share
that
with
the
cpc
see
how
people
feel
about
answering
those
questions
and
then,
if
the
cpc
is
happy
about
it,
figure
out
was
the
foundation
how
to
extend
that
survey
to
the
the
every
project.
F
Essentially,
so
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
key
takeaways
from
that
meeting.
Robin
was
there
you
were
there
also.
Are
there
other
things
that
come
to
mind?
That
were
important.
Other
points
like
that.
I
can
also
go
check.
The
notes.
B
No,
I
think
you're
spot
on
I've
also
been
digging
deeper
into
the
chaos
project
and
their
metrics
as
well,
and
that's
evolving.
So
I've
gone
into
their
meeting
notes
to
see
where
they
are
so
I
can
bring
you
all
up
to
speed
your
next
working
session.
F
Oh-
and
there
are
two
other
things
on
this
topic
that
I
like
to
quickly
share-
I
actually
took
the
linux
foundation
course
on
inclusive
speaking.
I
thought
it
wasn't
bad.
I
didn't
think
it
was
like
the
most
exciting
content
ever
it
felt
a
bit
dated,
so
I
think
it's
good
for
people
to
take
it.
I
would
love
for
it
to
be
something
a
bit
more,
modern
and
enticing
in
that
space.
F
So
if
anyone
hears
of
something
that
would
be
very
useful
and
then
the
other
thing
is,
I'm
also
part
of
the
the
group
that
works
on
these
issues
at
the
w3c
and
they're
actually
very
curious
about
the
f.
What
we're
trying
to
do
and
would
love
to
like
sink,
and
so
I
think,
that's
also
an
interesting
you
know.
Future
perspective
to
do
is
like
work
with
other
similar
organizations
to
sort
of
try
to
tackle
these
things
collectively,
rather
than
separately.
F
D
F
A
F
I
think
we
should
sarah
and
I
should
find
the
time
to
work
on
this
and
bring
a
set
of
questions
and
then
share
those
with
you
in
in
a
week
and
then
and
get
your
input.
Okay,.
A
A
Cool
for
the
sake
of
time,
I
will
move
on.
The
next
item
is
673.
This
is
google
summer
of
code
2021,
I'm
noticing
that
this
applications
close
on
february
19th.
So
this
is
kind
of
a
last
bit
of
notice
if,
if
any
projects
want
to
get
involved
reach
out
to
to
brian
or
operations
at
openjsf.org,
I
would
imagine,
unless
anybody
has
anything
else
there,
I
will
move
on,
remove
growth
stage.
This
is
pull
request
650.
F
So
I
felt
like
this
had
been
broadly
approved
and
it
just
needed
to
be
merged,
but
it
hasn't
been,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
missing
something
or
not.
F
A
D
F
C
A
Cool
so
then
the
only
one
left
is
the
dco
cla
issue
632..
That.
A
B
Sure
I
can
give
you
all
a
quick
update.
Some
of
you
may
know
that
we
became
aware
that
a
cloud
hosting
company
sky
silk
was
using
linux
foundation
and
node.js
trademarks
to
market
their
business,
which
is
the
new
business
or
actually
not
a
new
business
but
they're
hosting
parlor,
so
the
lf
just
released.
I
will
paste
it
in
twitter,
a
tweet
with
this
copy
of
the
season,
this
letter
that
we
sent
to
sky
silk.
A
I'm
looking
at
it
does
it
mention
the
node.js
logo
at
all.
I'm
trying
to
scan.
A
B
A
A
I
I'll
I'll
all
read
through
it,
real,
quick
and
then
probably
just
retweet,
the
lf
great
post.
A
Great,
thank
you
tony
and
thank
you
robin
and
everyone
at
lf
cool,
it's
messy,
but
otherwise
that's
all
we
got
so
we'll
call
it
a
wrap.
I
appreciate
everyone
taking
the
time
to
hang
out
and
get
some
work
done,
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
soon.