►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Cool
welcome
everyone
to
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
the
22nd
of
june
another
lovely
day
in
the
year.
2021
yeah
thanks
for
joining,
don't
forget
to
put
yourself
in
the
the
doc.
A
We
have
a
light
agenda
with
an
expectation
that
we
may
spend
some
time
talking
about
the
community
fund,
which
is
one
of
the
items
on
our
agenda
as
well.
Oh,
I
see
michael
dawsom.
C
A
I
love
it.
Nice
cool.
A
Great
cool,
so
before
we
get
into
the
agenda
items,
do
we
have
any
announcements.
B
I
think
a
couple
of
fun
ones,
one
being
that
this
friday
is
our
board
meeting.
That's
fun.
That
sounds
fun.
Doesn't
it,
and
so
there's
also
a
public
session
for
that
so
subscribe
to
the
calendar
to
put
those
on
your
calendar,
so
you
can
get
the
the
links
to
youtube
and
all
that
fun
stuff.
So
that's
that's
happening.
B
I
feel
like.
Was
there
something
else?
Oh
this
was
kind
of
fun.
This
is
this
is
sort
of
tangentially
related,
but
today
is
the
ekma
general
assembly
meeting
and
where
they
actually
do
the
formal
vote
process
to
approve
final
draft
specifications
and
technical
recommendations.
B
It
was
really
cool
because
this
morning
there
were
seven
documents
to
approve,
five
of
which
were
js
related
and
the
two
ekma
262
and
402
specs,
and
then
also
three
documents
out
of
the
brand
new
tc53,
which
is
javascript
on
embed
embedded
devices.
That's
their
first
set
of
formally
approved
docs,
and
it's
just
like
super
rad
to
see.
I
know
there's
several
people
in
this
community
that
were
involved
with
the
tc53
so
congrats
to
all
of
the
javascripters
who
have
contributed
to
these
these
docs
and
get
to
have.
A
A
Cool
cool
beans
great,
so
I
suspect
we
will
crush
this
agenda
right
quickly.
The
first
item
sorry.
E
One
quick
announcement-
I
don't
know
if
we
have
people
who
are
listening
or
watching
in
china,
but
there
is
the
linux,
is
hosting
an
event
in
china
july
7th
through
9th,
and
I
will
be
speaking
along
with
a
number
of
other
lf
folks.
So
I'll
put
it
here,
obviously
virtual
for
those
of
us
who
are
not
in
shanghai
or
shenzhen,
but
excited
to
share
the
javascript
news.
There
cool
all
those
cool
project
updates.
F
A
And
that's
something
we
can.
We
can
all
watch
as
well.
E
A
Sorry,
the
first
item
is
reminders
for
long-term
events.
I
was
just
scrolling
through
the
comments
here.
You
know.
I
don't
think,
there's
really
much
to
talk
about
here.
I'm
hoping
that
at
some
point
I
might
be
able
to
work
on
some
sort
of
scripts
that
we
can
github
action
that
we
can
lean
on,
for
you
know
timely
items
whatever
they
may
be,
but
I
don't
have.
Any
updates
now
feel
free
to
speak
up.
A
If
you
have
anything
to
add
to
this
agenda
item
otherwise,
no
update
this
week,
I'm
gonna
jump
to
the
last
one.
In
fact,
I
will,
in
the
dock,
move
it
up,
not
that
there's
much
to
talk
about
here
either.
I
assume
there's
no
dco
cla
updates
here
as
well.
A
E
A
E
A
A
Anyway,
all
right
cool,
so
on
to
our
last
agenda
item,
which
is
the
community
fund.
This
is
issue
756,
create
proposals
for
the
community
fund.
There
is
a
helpful
comment
there
from
jory
from
a
week
ago,
because
we
talked
about
this
in
our
last
working
session,
but
if
we
want
to
use
the
remainder
of
our
time
to
kind
of
get
everybody
up
to
speed
and
maybe
discuss
a
little
bit
further,
I
would
turn
the
microphone
over
to
jory
to
to
give
us
an
up.
B
I
think
I
should
I
mean
I
think
it's
sort
of
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
do
last
time
after
the
working
session,
because
we
we
didn't
have
like
a
huge
turnout
for
the
working
session.
We
did
take
some
notes.
Those
are
linked
in
issue
756
to
a
hackmd
and
for
the
for
the
parties
that
were
available.
We
really
kind
of
landed
on
the
sense
that
you
know,
primarily,
the
community
fund
should
should
target
specific
programs
that
we've
already
kind
of
more
or
less
know.
These
are
things
that
are
important
to
us.
B
Funding,
travel
funding,
scholarships
for
certain
things,
like
some
sort
of.
Perhaps
thanks
or
you
know,
gratitude.
You
know,
appreciation
program
of
some
sort
and
standards.
Participation
was
another
one
where
we
were
already
supporting
some
people
in
the
community
to
go
serve
as
invited
experts.
So
these
are.
These
are
programs
that
we
think
that
we've
already
got
a
fair
amount
of
shared
understanding,
but
we
need
to
kind
of
add
a
few
more
details
around,
so
people
can
kind
of
understand
the
requirements.
B
The
constraints
like
you
know
what
it
means
to
participate
in
that
program
and
so
that
it's
really
clear
and
it
makes
approval
for
you
know,
for
participation
in
that
program
faster.
B
That
was
one
thing
that
we
talked
about,
wanting
to
be
able
to
do,
which
is
move
more
promptly
on
on
these
things
that
have
those
clear
boundaries.
So
people
aren't
kind
of
in
limbo
for
several
weeks,
wondering
if
they're
going
to
get
to
go
to
that
conference,
because
there's
there's
not
an
answer
yet.
B
We
also
talked
about
how
to
figure
out
like
whether
and
how
project
maintainers
could
request
funds
for
something
that
don't
that
doesn't
necessarily
fit
within
those
existing
programs
right.
So
it's
that
something
that
may
feel
a
little
bit
more
ad
hoc
and
we
didn't
want
to
disclude
that
from
happening,
because
that's
a
valuable
feedback
mechanism
for
us
as
a
foundation
to
say.
Oh,
this
is
something
that
perhaps
a
couple
of
maintainers
would
like
to
see
that
that
helps
them
that
benefits
their
projects.
B
So
maybe
this
could
be
developed
into
a
program
later
and
so
being
able
to
evaluate
and
accept
requests
for
something.
That's
not
part
of
a
preset
package
would
be
great,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
those
requests
have
a
clear
rubric
for
evaluation
and
that
they
have
maintainers,
have
support
from
cpc
representatives
to
scope
and
define
and
describe
the
request
and
the
purpose,
and
that
kind
of
thing
clearly
so
everybody's.
On
the
same
page,
we
talked
about
the
fact
that
probably
there
should
be
some
kind
of
of
cap.
B
B
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
there's
a
sort
of
an
upper
bound,
especially
given
that
we
want
to
see
that
the
benefit
of
the
financial
benefit
goes
to
a
an
individual,
but
the
projects
that
that
individual
is
affiliated
with
also
see
some
kind
of
benefit,
and
we
had
a
couple
of
examples
in
our
in
our
notes
document
that
kind
of
describe
that,
and
I
can
go
through
some
of
those
if
you're
interested
and
then
last
but
not
least,
we
and
and
michael
really
helped
kind
of
paint.
This
too.
B
For
me,
we
should
make
sure
that
they're
that
we're
mindful
of
this
sort
of
gray
line
between
the
community
fund
being
a
source
of
direct
support
for
their
projects
versus
being
a
fund
that
like
actually
helps
individuals
who
are
trying
to
get
like
further
involved
with
our
with
our
projects.
B
For
example,
you
know
a
code
and
learn
type
of
activity
or
a
survey
or
something
where
there's
there
is
a
lot
of
mutual
benefit
to
support
a
person
participating
in
that,
but
also
it's
it's
kind
of
a
program
to
support
the
project
too,
and
there's
a
line
where
the
group
felt
like
okay.
Some
of
these
programs
should
be
separately
accounted
for
in
the
in
the
budget
as
outside
of
the
community
fund
and
versus
what's
accounted
for
inside
the
community
fund.
B
So
that
briefly,
hopefully
captures
the
wide-ranging
conversation
that
we
had
last
tuesday
and
we
felt
good
about
this
direction
for
shaping
proposals
and
things
like
that.
But
I
wanted
to
bring
it
back
to
the
cpc
for
broader
discussion
and
make
sure
that
we're
not
missing
something.
B
D
Yeah,
no,
I
think
that
you
know
the
the
the
couple
of
things.
Just
I
might
comment
on
is
like
the
going
to
an
individual
was
kind
of
a
one
way
where
it's
like
that,
naturally
limits
the
amount
of
an
ask
like
it's
not
like
hey.
I
can
ask
for
20
000
to
run
a
big
survey
or
to
run
a
big
event
for
my
project.
It's
more
like
I
can
individuals
who
are
in
who
can't
get
to
those
events
on
their
own
could
apply
and
get
support
to
get
there.
D
But
you
know
that's,
like
naturally
capped
at
a
thousand
or
two
thousand
or
something
like
that
in
terms
of
the
individual
asks
that
was
kind
of
one
of
the
the
things
that
the
fact
that
we
discussed
and
then
the
the
line
of
the
fund,
the
project
funding
was,
you
know
again
it's
it's
kind
of
like
we
don't
necessarily
want
projects
to
be
using
this
to
say
I
need
hardware
or
I
need
something
for
my
project.
You
know
the
direct
project
support
you
know.
D
B
So
I
guess
the
ask
today
is
really
to
check
in
with
the
group
here
noting
of
course,
it's
another
kind
of
small
group,
so
we'll
probably
want
to
bring
this
back
or
or
prompt.
Maybe
something
async
and
chat
to
discuss
like
is
this
direction,
one
that
feels
good
for
our
our
our
communities?
This
certainly,
there
were
reps
from
other
projects,
node
amp,
electron,
etc,
on
the
call
for
the
working
meeting,
but
you
know
want
to
make
kind
of
sure
that
this
is
helpful
directionality
for
the
project
and
the
promote
jordan.
B
A
G
Yeah
yeah,
this
seems
this
seems
great
and
kind
of
in
line
with
what
we've
been
talking
about
for
the
the
one
question
I
had
was
about
the
the
requirements
or
kind
of
the
max
amount
that
people
could
ask
for
given
with
60k.
Here
we
probably
want
more
than
one
or
two
initiatives
to
get
funding.
G
Have
we
put
any?
Have
we
put
any
thought
into
what
that
looks
like
and
kind
of
how
many
initiatives
we
want
to
be
able
to
fund
per
year.
D
That's
a
really
good
point
which
we
didn't
we
didn't
discuss,
but
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
like
for
each
of
the
identified
programs.
It
would
be
nice
to
have
a
you
know
like
travel.
I
think
we've
always
discussed
that
in
the
past
years,
where
they
were
regular
years,
we
spent
30
000
or
something
so
you
could
say
that's
kind
of
what
we
think
for
that
and
like
scholarships,
you
could
pick
some
number
that
says
like
this
is
the
total
we
can
use
for
that
right
and
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful.
E
G
Yeah,
do
we
foresee
spending
this
budget
this
year,
given
that
we're
kind
of
coming
up
with
these
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
this
is
an
important
question
to
get
answer,
but
we're
coming
up
with
these
standards
like
over
halfway
through
the
year
people
don't
know
about
it,
people
aren't
traveling.
D
I
I'm
not
sure
I'd
worry
too
much
about
whether
we
do
or
don't
I'd
be
more
like
if
we
can
get
these
things
in
place.
It
sets
us
up
nicely
for
next
year
and
and
by
like,
I
think,
if
we
kind
of
consider
a
normal
year
right,
because
if
we,
if
we
go
and
spend
all
of
the
money
on
one
area
and
then
only
have
a
tenth
of
that
next
year,
I'm
not
sure
that
that
helps,
although
maybe
it
does.
Maybe
it
says
this
year,
we're
not
traveling.
So
let's
spend
more
on
something
else.
B
B
B
This
cf
down
like
further
just
feels
a
little
premature
just
because
we
don't
know
how
many
people
are
necessarily
interested
and
able
to
take
advantage
of
it
as
as
yet,
and
it
may
be
that
in,
like,
like,
I
said,
2022,
it's
like,
let's
go
to
austin
texas,
you
know
see
everybody
for
the
conference.
I
will
definitely
be
there.
G
D
E
B
Pool
perhaps
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
process,
though
I
think
at
the
working
meeting.
For
the
most
part,
the
group
sort
of
felt
that
the
cpc's
role
immediately
should
just
be
establishing
parameters
of
the
program
and
letting
some
of
those
implementation
details
fall
to
the
foundation
staff
to
execute
on.
So,
if
that's
like,
oh,
this
is
how
we're
gonna
do
expensify.
B
That
that's
that's
what
we
do
and-
and
you
know
also
we'll
need
to
do
some
education
and
exploration
on
the
the
the
lfx
tool
for
for
how
that
transparently
shows
the
ledger
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
there's
some
some
of
that
stuff,
but
it
seems
like,
for
the
most
part,
the
the
group
was
more
interested
in
making
sure
it
had
the
rules
of
the
program
kind
of
in
place
and
then
understand
the
understanding
of
the
accounting
controls
that
would
exist
than
than
say.
B
You
know
getting
heavy
into
the
process
right.
E
D
Process
right
and
that's
how
that's
having
that
agreement
up
front,
so
it's
I
think
jerry
was
you
know.
At
least
I
expressed
like
the
mechanics
of
how
you
push
the
buttons
and
whatever,
and
what
tool
you're
using.
I
don't
think
is
too
much
of
a
worry
it's
more
of
like
yeah.
What
are
the
rules
for
application
and
who
approves
and
yeah?
I
guess
you
know
we
know
we
we
haven't
had
to
face
that
in
the
the
travel
fund
but
like
if
you,
if
you
can't
approve
them
all.
What
do
you
end
up
doing
right.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
that
also
may
be
something
that
can
be
variable
depending
on
the
on
the
program
right.
B
Where
there
might
be
more
competition
for
certain,
you
know
programs,
so
you
know
I
like
I,
I
feel,
like
that's
a
very
important
conversation,
but
it's
also
possibly
one.
We
should
have
as
we're
putting
the
parameters
that
we
need
around
the
program.
I
think
the
travel
fund
is
one.
B
That's
already
pretty
darned,
you
know
understood
by
this
community,
and
so
we
could
largely
pick
it
up
and
and
sort
of
test
it
out
and
put
it
and
put
it
in
in
the
current
and
just
say:
okay
now
what
needs
to
change
to
fit
and
go
from
there,
but
some
of
the
other
things
like
a
like
a
thank
you
program
where
a
maintainer
may
want
to
send.
You
know
an
appreciation
token
to
someone.
What
does
that?
Look
like
we've?
Never,
we
we've
not
done
something
like
this.
This
way.
D
B
So
I
I
think
the
next
steps
might
be
to
take
like
the
travel
fund,
for
example,
and
just
say:
okay,
if
we
were
launching
that
with
that
today,
you
know
where,
where
and
how
do
we
want
to
document
this?
And
what
does
that?
What
are
the
operational
steps
there
that
the
group
wants
to
take
and
then
probably
roll
to.
E
Others
can
I
ask,
since
we
don't,
have
an
open,
js
event
in
2021.
There
are,
of
course,
other
third
party
events
and
lf
events,
but
we
do
have
active
requests
for
scholarships
for
the
node
certification.
So
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
take
an
experiment
on
something
that
we
could
implement
sooner
rather
than
later.
E
I
would
love
to
recommend
that
program
or
to
establish
some
sort
of
program,
or
I
don't
know
if
we
still
need
to
like
reach
out
to
our
projects,
who
are
not
represented
on
this
on
this
meeting
too,
to
get
some
more
ideas
and
feedback
from
the.
D
Notes,
I
think,
an
fyi.
It
doesn't
hurt,
like
the
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
needs
to
delay
anything
but
like
a
summary
that,
like
jory
put
together
and
says
you
know
we're
we're
thinking
like
typically,
we
haven't
spent
all
the
dollars
in
the
travel
fund.
So
we're
you
know
thinking
of
expanding
here
the
things
we're
thinking
of
expanding
it
to
let
us
know
if
you
have
any
questions
or
comments,
that's
like
in
your
weekly
newsletter
or
whatever
the
email
blast
of
the
maintainers
make
sense.
D
And
I
guess
that
the
one
thing
we
might
want
to
think
about
there
is,
like
you
know,
do
we
want
to
say
anything
along
the
lines
of
you
know
for
for
the
for
next
year,
when
travel's
normal?
We
expect
to
support
the
same
like
the
question
I'm
I'm
for
seeing
is
like
well
what
does
that
mean
to
the
travel
fund
right
like
if
we
have
these
other
programs?
Does
that
mean
we
have
less
support
for
travel?
So
we
might
want
to
answer
that
up
front
to
say.
D
B
I
think
that
makes
sense,
and
I
think
another
thing
that
I
I
wonder
about,
and
this
is
something
that
we
should
think
more
long
term
about
is
how
do
we
measure
the
success
of
these
programs?
You
know
and
with
with
travel?
I
think,
okay
well
there.
I
I
personally
would
ideally
want
to
support
a
maximum
number
of
people
possible,
and
so
success
is
sort
of
like
we
helped
a
hundred
people
get
to
experience
like
a
community
event
in
some
way,
and
that,
like
that,
that's
cool
like
that,
feels
like
a
win.
B
You
know
when
I
think
about
like
a
scholarship
fund.
It's
like
yeah,
like
helping
a
maximum
number
of
people,
do
or
achieve
some
goal
or
for
like
the
thank
you
program,
you
know
helping
just
generally,
the
community
feel
nicer
and
be
more
appreciative,
and
you
know
that's
something
that
is
really
important.
So
that's,
maybe
a
longer
term
conversation
to
have,
but
I'd
love
for
us
to
kind
of
think
in
those
terms,
because
they're
real
people
who
really
will
hopefully
get
a
lot
out
of
this
and
thinking
about
it.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
first
I
think,
like
you
said
it's
very
program
specific
right
because
the
you
know
I
guess
like
the
scholarships-
it's
probably
not
to
get
everybody
a
scholarship
right.
It's
to
get
the
right.
People
to
scholarship,
so
it'll
have
to
sort
of
fill
in
the
the
qualification
criteria
and
all
those
kinds
of
things
per
per.
D
B
So,
just
to
kind
of
recap,
it
sounds
like
one
one
direct
ask
us
this
from
this
conversation
is
to
send
this
around
to
all
the
project
maintainers
and
make
sure
there's
not
either
a
program
or
perspective
that
we're
kind
of
missing
out
on
and
get
their
sense
of,
like
kind
of
what
might
be
most
exciting
to
them
to
get
involved
with
first.
B
D
D
Looking
at
the
final
pr
there's,
you
know
brian's
proposal
for
how
generally
it
would
work,
so
we
we
know
what
the
tools
being
proposed
and
unless
people
are
objecting
to
that,
it
would
be
like
okay,
let's
update
it,
to
use
that,
and
somebody
who
knows
the
that
tool
could
probably
do
that
separately
and
until
then
we
could
just
you
know
we
could
use
the
existing
process
if
we
had
to
right.
B
Yeah,
no,
I
just
I
I
thought
well,
this
is
one
where,
since
everybody
kind
of
gets,
the
program
like
it
helps
highlight
and
the
process
changes
because
you're
not
questioning,
but
but
I
think
those
are
not
the
more
exciting
things
anyway,
so
exciting.
E
I
can
take
an
action
and
develop
some
or
explore
some
guidelines
for
scholarships.
I
know
that
lf
has
done
this
and
along
other
certifications,
whether
for
kubernetes
or
elsewhere,
more
on
the
dei
front,
but
just
broadly
so
I'll
I'll,
pull
that
and
share.
D
E
G
In
the
past,
I've
seen
so
one
thing
that
can
happen
sometimes
with
these,
as
I'm
sure
that
I'll
have
seen,
is
that
people
get
the
scholarships
and
then
just
don't
use
them,
because
it's
easy
to
get
in
the
past.
I've
seen
things
like
essays
like
a
long
word,
but
just
you
know
some
type
of
long-form
application
that
just
talks
about
like
how
it
would
benefit
you
and
what
your
plans
are.
I've
also
seen
things
like.
G
If
you
don't
take
it,
you
have
to
pay
for
it,
but
that's
awful,
I
think
so,
but
just
something
in
which
that
it
would
ensure
that
people
that
are
going
to
use
the
scholarship
are
getting
the
scholarship
so
that,
because,
if
they
don't,
then
other
people
that
might
use
it
may
not
get
it
because
of
the
limited
quantity.
G
I
E
D
C
I
have
you
considered
something
of
the
sort
where
you
know
I
might
be.
I
might
I
might
be
speaking
out
online,
but
I
don't
know
the
whole
process,
but
you
know
where
we
let
the
people
take
the
exam
all
right
and
then
reimburse
them
for
taking
the
exam
like.
Let's
say
they
did
apply
for
the
scholarship
and
due
to
some
circumstances,
they,
you
know
lost
it.
You
know
in
the
first
month,
but
then
they
were
able
to
take
it
in
the
second
month
and
then
they
come
back
and
say:
hey
you
know.
C
First
month
I
was
really
busy
or
had
some
unforeseen
circumstances
that
were
out
of
my
control.
I
know
I
lost
it,
but
I
still
took
it
I'm
successful
at
it.
There's
the
proof.
Is
there
a
way
you
could
reimburse
me?
I
think
that
would
give
a
little
bit
more
incentive
than
just
like
being
like
hey.
You
know
what
you
can't
take
it
during
the
first
month,
we're
going
to
take
it
away
kind
of
thing,
because
you
know
things
happen,
and
you
know
I'm
just.
B
Well,
playing
devil's
advocate
here
on
that
approach.
There's
two
things
that
jumps
out
at
me:
one
is
that
actually
the
administrative
overhead
of
processing
and
the
reimbursements
in
that
case
may
be
kind
of
more
trouble.
You
know,
especially
when
you're
looking
at
something
that's
only
a
couple
hundred
dollars,
really
it's,
but
if
you've
got
to
keep
track
of
like
that,
a
person
has
done
this
and
that's
they're
now
ready
for
being
reimbursed,
or
you
know
that
kind
of
thing.
B
It
actually
puts
a
lot
more
burden
on
on
on
staff
and
that
may
not
that
may
not
be
actually
kind
of
worth
it.
The
second
knock
that
I
have
against
something
like
that
is
that
there
are
a
lot
of
people
for
whom
you
know
that
amount
of
money
is
significant
and
even
the
you
know
ask
of
hey.
You
spend
the
money
up
front
and
we'll
give
that
back
to
you.
Well,
that
might
be
rent
money
or
that
might
be.
You
know
they
may.
B
May
not
have
a
credit
card,
it
may
be.
You
know
some
something,
that's
geographically
very
difficult
for
them.
So
for
for
a
large
large
things,
you
know.
Maybe
it's
worth
it,
but
I
I
would,
I
would
say
for
some
of
the
stuff
it's
it's
that
we
may
be
doing
scholarships
for
it's,
maybe
not
ultimately,.
D
D
You
know
if
a
month
is
too
short,
we've
just
got
to
figure
out
what
the
balance
or
timeline
is
or
some
something
where
it's
like
we
check
in
after
a
month
and
say
well,
are
you
still
planning
to
take
it
or
something
so
that
you
know
we
address
the
well?
We
we,
you
know
meant
to
give
it
out,
but
this
person's
not
going
to
use
it
in
the
end
right.
So
we
want
to
give
it
to
somebody
else
before
it's
too
late,
but
I'd
address
it
on
that
side
versus
the
well.
D
D
I
I
do
like
sarah's
point
as
well
about
like
you
know,
and
you
know
the
application
program.
You
know
the.
How
will
this
affect
you
or
or
something
that's
like
you
know
that
says
why?
Why
is
needed
versus
making?
I
guess
it's
the
balance
between
like
how
hard
it
is
to
apply
versus
not,
but
there
is
a
it's
a
good
point
to
figure
out
where
that,
where
the
right
balance
is
to
get
the
right
things
happening.
E
B
Well,
not
to
like
totally
jump
ahead
or
anything,
but,
but
I
am
going
to
for
just
a
second.
The
next
working
session
is
on
is
next
tuesday.
B
We
had
loosely
preset
a
number
of
working
session
topics,
so
we
had
preset
that
the
june
29
working
meeting
would
be
on
tech
strategy,
but
I
wonder
if
instead,
we
bump
that
to
july
13
and
take
june
29
to
flesh
out
together
a
or
to
perhaps
review,
because
somebody
has
taken
the
initiative
to
flesh
out
a
a
a
stab
at
the
scholarship
program
and
kind
of
move.
It
move
from
there.
D
B
I
guess
the
next
thing
to
discuss
would
be
would
be
the
working
meeting
or
the
working
meetings,
plural.
So
in
the
agenda
doc,
I
I
posted
a
link
to
the
cpc
739,
which
is
like
the
issue
that
has
all
of
our
meetings.
I'm
updating
it
right
now
to
say
that
next
week
our
working
meeting
will
be
on
the
scholarship
program,
and
so
that's
that
there
we
go,
but
I
guess
the
the
question
for
the
group
would
be
looking
at
the
weeks
ahead.
B
D
B
That's
definitely
that
that
one's
still
alive
and
we
I
think
we
made
really
good
progress
on
on
that.
If
you
go
back
and
look
at
the
notes,
we
really
did
have
like
this
nice
full
list
of
kind
of
projects
and
categories
and
domains,
and
that
kind
of
thing
I
think,
the
next
step
there
is
to
figure
out
what
we
want
to
do
with
that
information,
how
we
want
to
use
it
and
that
that
will
that
will
be
a
great
discussion.
D
E
B
E
I
started
one
just
thinking
about
the
existing
collab
space
we
have
and
around
security
issues
if
that
becomes
sort
of
a
working
session
with
that
core
team,
perhaps
you
know.
E
And
I
was
chatting
with
darcy
a
little
yesterday
just
about
if
there's
any
there's
any
sort
of
big
ass,
that
they
would
want
or
need
something
that
would
really
benefit
all
the
projects,
something
that
would
need
additional
funding,
for
example,
kind
of
a
wish
list.
So
it
might
be
great
once
they
sort
of
get
you
know
some
of
their.
E
B
With
working
session
with
the
pkg
security
volume
working
group,
there
we
go.
B
B
B
All
right!
Well,
I
think
that's
that
then
I
guess
I
should
say
I'm
not
going
to
be
here
for
the
next
working
meeting
or
the
next
regular
meeting
I'm
going
to
be
on
vacation.
B
C
B
I'll
be
south
of
there
by
about
an
hour
in
saint
augustine,
that's
what's
going
on.
B
C
B
Okay,
cool!
Well,
that's!
That's
it!
That's
all.
I
think
I
have
that's
interesting,
including
my
travel
plans.
A
A
Cool
well,
we'll
call
it
a
wrap.
Then.