►
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
A
Okay,
we're
on
being
recorded
so
welcome
everyone.
This
is
the
openjs
foundation
cross
project.
Council
today
is
April
11
2023,
our
trustee
chair
Joseppi's
on
vacation,
so
we're
I'm
filling
in
for
him
as
well
as
everyone
else,
we'll
back
him
up.
So
do
we
have
any
announcements
today
highly
want
to
give
an
update
on
the
events.
B
Yeah,
so
we
are
planning
for
open,
JS
World,
which
is
coming
in
May
and
the
day
before
is
our
open,
JS,
collab
Summit.
The
call
for
sessions
is
closing
for
that
on
April
16th.
So
if
you
want
to
speak
at
the
club
Summit,
what
we've
posted
on
our
social
there's,
also
a
Blog
on
it
so
head
over
to
our
website
for
all
the
details
there
and
then
registration
still
open
for
openjs
World
in
May
in
Vancouver.
B
We
hope
to
see
you
there,
otherwise
we'll
be
planning
for
some
other
events
later
in
the
year.
In
case
you
missed
this
one,
and
the
cfp
is
open
for
openjs
World
Europe.
So
if
you
have
a
talk-
or
maybe
you
missed
the
deadline
for
the
Vancouver
Summit,
submit
your
talk
for
Europe
and
I-
think
that
will
be
closing
sometime
in
May.
I.
B
A
And
we
still
have
our
I
know.
You
all
have
your
CPC
travel
fund.
If
you
need
help
with
travel,
if
you're
active
with
the
foundation
or
any
of
our
projects,
we
have
that
those
resources
available
so
cool
all
right.
So,
let's
see
first
issue
the
code
of
conduct,
patching
script,
lots
of
activity
outlooked.
We
could
just
hit
the
the
pr
and
just
do
an
all
up
date
on
that
body
of
work.
C
C
Second,
PR
at
all,
it's
just
directly
push
up
changes
after
the
second,
the
first
first
pull
request
is
approved.
Alternatively,
the
first
pull
request
could
be,
could
include
the
could
be
made
to
include
the
full
changes
you
know,
but
the
yeah,
but
so
so,
in
other
words,
we're
waiting
for
somebody
to
weigh
back
in
after
they
had
expressed
some
some
concern.
C
C
Yeah
so
in
in
theory
like,
if,
if
we
all
have
equivalent
understanding-
which
we
probably
do
not
at
the
moment,
but
in
theory
at
that
point
yeah
we're
done.
We
can
start
making
changes
to
the
code
of
conduct
and
it
will
keep
keep
us
in
sync
with
the
Upstream,
the
Upstream
Source,
as
we
need
and
we'll
be
able
to
know
which
version
we're
basing
it
off
of
and
so
on.
E
C
It's
still
it's
still
manual.
Okay,
it's
just
it
makes
it
much
easier
to
know
that
we
need
to
do
an
update
and
to
actually
do
one
and
potentially
we
could
even
automate
it
and
be
like
hey
the
Upstream
change
and
have
an
issue
automatically
filed,
asking
us
to
update
the
code
of
conduct
or
something.
But
that's
you
know,
future
enhancements.
A
E
D
A
A
I
know
I've
been
talking
to
Bentley
on
the
next
thing
on
our
list
and
we're
actually
creating
better
documentation
around
the
roles
in
the
election.
I
think
it's
been
clear
as
mud
a
little
bit
and
when
new
people
step
in
so
I
think
if
we're
going
to
do
it
now
might
be
a
good
time
as
we
start
to
document
here's
our
roles,
here's
the
time
the
elections
open.
F
E
E
You
know,
I
looked
at
the
roles
and
I'm
like
well,
you
know
I,
wouldn't
mind
actually
like
learning
about
what
sharing
this
is
about
and
helping
out
but
like
take
this
over,
for
you
know
like
from
one
day
to
the
other
feels
like
a
huge
amount
of
work
that
I'm
not
sure
you
know
anyone's
really
ready
to
do.
Plus
you
know.
Are
we
trying
to
sort
of
like
compete
for
those
roles
or
help
each
other
out
and
make
the
whole
thing
work
better,
so
I
don't
know
it
just
feels
more
collegial
that
way.
A
On
the
board
we
have
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair.
We
typically
don't
fill
the
secretary
and
treasure
roles,
like
others,
we're
still
small
enough.
I.
Think
that
having
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair
has
sort
of
been
enough
for
us,
we'll
see
if
we,
if
we
grow
the
board
over
time,
how
that
would
change
oops,
sorry
about
that
and
Tierney
I'm
trying
to
promote
you
to
a.
G
G
A
Great
and
that
really
essentially
then
falls
into
we
are
in
elections
right
now.
The
nomination
window
was
closing
last
night,
April,
10th,
11,
59
I
believe
p.m.
Pacific
the
voting
period
is
April
11th
through
the
17th.
You
should
be
hearing
from
Ben.
We
sometimes
extend,
depending
on
the
number
of
participants
we
get.
I
haven't
checked
in
with
I
haven't
heard
from
Ben
this
morning.
C
D
D
A
A
H
Yeah,
so
we
officially
started
using
it
in
the
project
it
works.
Seamlessly.
I
was
gonna,
actually
reach
out
to
the
team
to
ask
for
like
a
personal
like
update
or
status.
If
they
had
any
experiences,
so
I
don't
have
anything
yet
one
thing
that
I
think
I'm,
gonna,
try
and
figure
out
is
how
to
view
the
reporting
for
code
space
usage
Abby.
You
wouldn't
know
off
the
top
of
your
head,
if
that's
possible
at
the
org
level
or
like
how
I
can
monitor
each
person
using
it.
H
That'd
be
good,
so
then,
that
way,
like
my
goal
here,
is
that
the
individual
team
members
contributors
members-
and
we
also
set
it
to
outside
collaborators
so
like
if
we
do
have
a
good
like
a
collaborator,
and
we
want
to
enable
them
to
be
able
to
contribute
easier
or
just
give
them
a
more
powerful
machine.
We're
going
to
do
so,
but
I
just
want
to
understand
month
by
month
how
much
usage
we're
getting.
H
D
A
D
A
Think
we've
been
shipping
a
couple
of
other
things
in
the
past
couple
of
weeks,
so
we
haven't
made
progress
on
that.
But
if
anyone
wants
to
volunteer
we'll,
probably
meet
async
to
discuss
that
also
using
the
conference
as
sort
of
a
forcing
function.
So
we
can
have
some
new.
Perhaps
maybe,
before
the
conference
have
some
new.
You
know
shared
consensus
language
that
we
can
use
in
our
presentations.
D
A
Let's
see,
we've
covered
the
code
of
conduct
tool,
a
license
check,
support,
tooling
I,
don't
have
an
update
on
that,
but
I'm
actually
working
with
the
person
who
manages
that
feature
in
LFX
right
now
on
something
for
node.js.
So
I'll
follow
up
with
him
on
that,
because
that
was
something
that
we'd
like
to
get
worked
into.
The
LFX
dashboard,
which
was
the
intent.
F
A
That
I
think
would
cover
the
CPC
issues.
I
did
want
to
flag
on
that
to
secure
the
web
forward,
Workshop,
which
is
issue
213.
The
proposals
call
for
proposals
are
open
through
April,
24th,
I
believe
and
again
that's
sort
of
a
unique
I
wouldn't
call
it
like
a
conference
typical
conference
event.
It
is
a
workshop.
A
A
So
you
know
we'd
like
to
have
at
least
half
of
those
people
attending
have
be
participating
in
some
active
proposals
and
the
other
half
really
ready
to
learn
and
contribute,
so
it'll
be
quite
interesting.
I
think
Joe
and
I
are
going
to
propose.
We
talk
about
some
of
the
security
Cloud
space
work
and
get
feedback
from
some
of
these
standards
experts,
but
that's
June,
7th
and
8th
and
again
we
do
have
travel
funding,
support
for
folks
who
need
it
and
to
be
a
subject
matter:
expert
in
participating
standards,
conversations
representing
the
openjs
foundation.
E
Yeah
and
as
I
said,
I
think
in
the
standards
group.
If
anyone
wants
help
to
sort
of
like
bridge
the
gap
between
working
on
code
and
speaking
in
the
standard
space
I'm
more
than
happy
to
offer
to
to
help
people
do
do
the
write-up
or
know
a
little
more
about
what
they
they're
to
expect
and
I
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
it's
those
workshops
are
a
great
way
to
get
sort
of
in
that
space
between
being
more
of
a
coder
and
being
more
on
the
standards
side.
E
D
H
Sean
yeah
I
was
curious.
Do
we
are
we
officially
a
what
WG
organization
member
like
no
okay?
So
what
are
my
interest
is
in
the
past?
Is
that
you
know
webpack
wanted
to
like
be
an
active
participating
and
voting
member
at
organizations
like
tc39,
and
this
is
not
possible
unless
we
join
as
a
what
WG
member
or
the
organization
that.
H
C
H
Awesome
I
I
know
in
addition
to
like
the
tc39,
tooling
meetings.
You
know
there
is
some
interest
in
some
of
our
newer
contributors
and
maintainers
to
be
able
to
have
a
say
or
Vote
or
be
a
delegate.
Have
those
responsibilities
so
Okay
cool,
so
I
will
look
at
joining
those
meetings
so
that
we
can
establish.
A
It's
great
it's
a
great
group.
We
we
are
paid
member
of
w3c,
but
on
tc39,
for
example,
we
sponsored
Leia
Peru.
Well,
the
standards
working
group
folks
helped
nominate
her
and
get
her
into
tc39,
which
is
pretty
cool.
So
perfect,
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
great
work.
We
also
so
we
have
folks
from
tc39,
w3c
and
unicode
Consortium
and
tc53
participating
in
our
standards.
Working
group.
C
A
A
E
Yeah
and
I
do
want
to
point
out,
because
what
we
did
was
mentioned,
that
you
can
participate
to
what
we
do
directly,
but
that
you
know
if
there
was
a
need
for
the
openjsf
to
become
a
member
of
what
we
do.
That
would
also
be
fairly
straightforward
to
organize.
So
you
know
if
that
ever
becomes
a
thing,
it's
also
very,
very
doable.
There
are
no
fees
and
it's
just
essentially
a
Clarity
around
the
sort
of
how
the
IP
moves
from
the
contributors
to
the
organization
itself.
A
D
E
D
E
D
A
Oh
I'm,
sorry
about
that
yeah,
okay,
we
I
think
I'm
gonna,
take
an
action,
put
the
Sonos
to
turn
this
into
a
regular
meeting
instead
of
a
webinar.
So
because
sometimes
it's
hard
when
you
get
when
you're,
multiple
screens,
tracking,
okay,
great
so
maybe
before
we
jump
into
the
clarify
the
requirements,
thanks
for
catching
those
Toby
yeah
guys,
we
covered
the
the
the
issue.
The
first
issue
and
the
first
part
of
the
meeting
about
the
patching
script.
I
D
I
C
I
explained
the
way
the
process
is
supposed
to
work
and
how
we
eventually
want
to
get
rid
of
the
2pr
thing,
but
once
we're
sure
it's
working
and
that
it.
The
hope,
is
that
it's
just
misunderstandings
and
we're
waiting
to
hear
back
from
him
from
you
know
the
the
folks
who
had
pushed
back
to
to
clear
up
any
misunderstandings.
I
I
E
I
A
We're
gonna
have
a
working
session,
I
believe
Joe
used
the
last
working
session
and
we
did
some
async
feedback
and
I
know
he's
part
of
that
working
session.
I
think
with
Yogi's
on
the
tool,
but
we
had
Joanna
Lee
from
cncf
in
the
Linux
Foundation
come
and
share
some
of
the
work
in
progress
and
best
practices
that
they're
learning
from
their
work
in
kubernetes
and
cncf,
and
so
we've
taken
that
plus
some
conversations
and
our
openjs
working
sessions
and
Joe
has
Consolidated
it
into
a
nice,
concise
stock.
A
D
D
F
E
D
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
this
is
quite
relevant
too,
as
I've
talked
about
sort
of
documenting
and
simplifying
our
elections.
So
anybody
who
steps
in
can
understand
where
we
are
are
by
less
sometimes
are
clear,
as
mud
written
by
attorneys
and
we're
always
sort
of
gut
checking
ourselves
on
use
cases,
but
we
do
have
a
a
third
board
seat
that
is
not
in
use
because
the
way
our
bylaws
were
written,
it
was
written
for
an
individual
member.
A
We
have
decided
not
to
have
individual
members.
We
have
JavaScript
land,
yes,
supporters
who
are
not
voting
members.
The
membership
requirement
in
our
bylaws
is
set
at
2
000.
So
you
know
oftentimes
I'm
chasing
folks
down
for
Quorum,
which
is
over
50
percent,
so
imagine
trying
to
chase
down
Forum
on
2
000
individuals.
A
A
So
really
it's
up
to
the
sort
of
the
community
and
the
board,
and
then,
if
there's
any
bylaw
change,
we
bring
it
to
our
members.
Legal
counsel
for
feedback
as
well.
But
this
is
something
I've
been
wanting
to
to
have
as
well,
because
we
have
a
lovely
working
board
Abby's
on
it
right
now
and
having
more
voices
is
always
a
good
thing.
A
E
Oh,
this
feels
a
bit
like
the
co-chair
question
and
it
feels
like
we
sort
of
would
need
to
get
to
some
agreement
and
then
sort
of
decide
on
like
the
next
steps
to
actually
do
it.
If
we
want
to
do
it
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
need
a
work
session
to
have
agreement,
that
we
have
some
form
of
agreement
to
sort
of
like
what
what
the
plan
is
for
these
different
things.
A
E
G
D
G
E
F
B
D
E
G
G
It's
like
realistically
they're,
both
elected
by
the
CPC,
the
CPC
should
be
a
represented
representation
of
the
projects.
There's
no
like
saying
this.
One
represents
this
thing,
and
this
one
represents
this
other
thing
he's
not
they're
representing
the
same
thing:
I
I,
don't
think
that's
a
useful
distinction
at
all.
G
E
A
G
G
D
E
E
G
A
A
G
G
G
That
we
we
need
eight,
but
I
mean
do
we
do
we
just
like
legitimately
I
feel
like
we
can
just
put
out
a
vote
to
say:
hey?
Can
we
simplify
this
into
one
definition
like
I
feel
like
that
that
is
like
a
relatively
I
I,
don't
know
if
we
need
to
spend
an
hour
or
like
a
full
session
on,
like
figuring
that
out.
E
C
A
G
G
D
E
G
E
Fair
enough
yeah
cool
and
suggested
change
in
there,
and
then
we
can
offer
you
know
whoever
whoever
is
the
director
that
is
can
just
well.
Maybe
Sarah
can
just
take
this
to
the
board
and
and
have
that
conversation
there
I
think,
like
the
only
sort
of
like
small
bit
that
we
need
to
talk
about
that
I.
E
Think
Robin,
you
suggested
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
were
suggesting
this
would
be
to
have
a
plan
for
if
there's
a
hundred
project
like
in
two
years
that
sort
of
like
director
has
matched
a
number
of
projects
like
they
do
for
silver
members
or
whatever
the
the
thing
is
I
think
that
would
be
interesting.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
if
that
would
be
harder
to
get
approved
or
if
there's
like
more
language
about
this.
A
A
You
know
and
I
what
I'll
do
is:
I'll
speak
with
Andy
up
to
Grove
who's,
our
attorney
and
he
works
with
a
lot
of
Foundations
across
the
LF
and
I
can
ask
for
some
proposed
language
again.
He
we
would
take
this
through
our
member
legal
counsel,
anytime,
there's
a
bylaw
change
and
then
go
to
the
board,
but
understanding
I.