►
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
A
A
We've
got
a
small
group
today,
because
open
source
summit,
north
america
is
happening,
and
so
I
know
some
of
the
foundation
folks
are
there
and
some
other
folks
are
there
as
well,
but
we
will
work
our
way
through
the
agenda
regardless
and
get
into
things
here.
So
how
about
we
start
with
some
announcements
and
any
sort
of
board
updates?
B
Don't
have
anything
specific
to
call
out,
but
we
do
have
on
the
agenda
the
public
slides
from
the
june
board
meeting.
We
thought
you
know
we
tried
taking
the
cpc
through
that.
B
A
You
know,
I
think
one
thing
that
I
can
announce
is
that
we
merged
a
regular
member
in
a
little
over
two
weeks
ago.
I
think
you
know
we've
our
meeting
schedule's
been
a
little
bit
disrupted
by
openjs
world,
so
reefa
is
joining
as
a
regular
member.
Rifa
is
involved
in
the
loopback
project
and
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
acknowledge
them
and
welcome
them
in.
I
think
I
still
need
to
add
them
to
lists
and
stuff.
A
So
I
I
still
have
a
to-do
item
open
there
and
I
think
I
need
to
figure
out
who
will
help
me
with
that,
since
brian
warner,
the
master
of
all
things
has
left
us
cool.
So
that's
that
I
can't
think
of
anything
else.
A
Yeah
I
mean
open,
js
world
happened
and
I
think
I
had
a
good
time.
So
it
was
a
success
for
me.
A
C
B
Yep
yeah,
I
know
that
was
definitely
great
and
we
are
talking
about
collaborator
summit,
the
collaborative
summit
that
went
along
with
it,
I
think,
was
also
very,
very
good,
well
attended
and
we're
talking
about
doing
one
in
likely
doubling,
along
with
the
time
of
node
conf
for
you,
so
that'd
be
sort
of
another
opportunity
to
get
people
together.
A
B
A
D
B
I
guess
it
depends
on
how
much
of
a
risk
right.
Now,
all
the
conversations
are
relatively
informal,
but,
like
the,
I
think,
it's
it's
the
days
beforehand,
like
the
two
days
before
is
what
what
we're
talking
about
mostly
because
like
nordic
js
is
afterwards,
so
that
would
conflict,
so
I
believe
we're
trying
to
avoid
that.
A
Do
you
think
we
might
know
more
by
you
know
in
like
a
couple
of
weeks,
or
I
mean
I'm
kind
of
just
thinking
out
loud
here,
yeah.
B
I
think
I
think
a
couple
weeks
like
I'm
chasing
down,
you
know
opportunities
of
space
within
ibm
and
red
hat.
You
know
robin
mentioned
that
there
might
be
some
other
places
like
you
know.
Microsoft
or
google
might
have
some
space,
but
I
think
I'll
know
from
my
perspective,
within
a
couple
weeks.
B
A
All
right,
that's
exciting!
I'm
glad
that
there's
progress
there.
I
was
wondering
about
that
right
on
so
moving
along
then
yeah.
Let
me
get
into
that
too.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
club
summit
retrospective
wally.
Do
you
want
to
comment
on
this.
E
Yeah
sure
that's
that's
the
one
I
added,
so
I
was
initially
thinking
so
I
have.
I
have
some
some
things
noted
down.
I
wanted
to
share,
but
mainly
with
the
with
the
I
love
the
management
people
like
joey
or
robin
or
c,
who
can
who
can
help
us?
Do
it
in
a
better
way
next
time,
but
I'll
still
share
them
and
maybe
next
time
I'll
bring
it
back
again
just
for
for
to
get
some
feedback
from
them.
E
E
One
of
so
I've
just
like
taken
few
notes
and
helping
guys
if
you,
if
anyone
thinks
there's
like
more
more
stuff,
we
can
list
down
here
which
we
can
improve
in
future
for
sure
we
we
should
list
down
and
and
reflect
back
on
it.
So
I
think
we
so
in
terms
of
space
and
like
rooms,
I
think
we
had
enough
and
and
the
time
management
we
had.
We
had
enough
of
that,
which
was
great.
We
we
could
easily
arrange
like
there.
E
There
wasn't
like
we,
we
are
running
short
of
room
or
sort
of
time
so
which
which
went
which
went
great
so,
but
what
was
I
think
for
me
and
I
think
exp
everyone
else
experiences.
What
was
not,
that
good
is
the
a
so
that
the
rooms
were
too
big
for
the
audience
we
had
it's
and
that
creates
like
problem
for
not
everyone
able
to
hear
what
other
people
are
speaking
or
especially,
the
ones
who
joined
remotely
screen
and
audio
sharing
was
not.
E
It
was
not
possible
from
if
you're
sitting
on
the
table
as
we
were
the
conference
mic.
So
there
was
no.
We
didn't
had
conference
mic
as
we
have
normally
in
our
meeting
rooms,
which
have
like
mult.
They
can
get
audio
from
multiple
directions,
it's
easier
for
for
more
people
and
and
the
webcam
for
the
room.
It
was
not
so
so,
generally
speaking,
remote
audience
didn't
had,
I
think,
a
good
experience,
so
it
was
not
set
up
to
be
true.
E
We
didn't,
I
think
we
didn't
ask
for
it
also,
because
the
the
summit
before
before
was
more
in
person.
We
didn't
do
anything
much
about
the
remote
one.
The
after
one
was
all
remote,
so
we
didn't
had
problems
for
the
first
time
that
it
was
hybrid,
plus
remote
and
we
were
trying
to
manage
both
the
things
and
that
created
some
complexity.
So
I
think
maybe
if
we
would
have
asked
for
these
things
earlier
on,
we
could
have
arranged
them,
but
we
we
didn't
so
oh
for
the
future
yeah.
E
These
are
my
notes
and
then
I'll
bring
it
to
jordy
and
celia.
So
so
next
time
we
can
give,
we
should
have
like
smaller
rooms
at
20,
30
people
maximum
can
fit
in
so
that
they
can
easily
hear
and
talk
about
it
and
and
have
a
proper
setup
like
like
a
meeting
room
setup.
We
have
in
our
companies
where
there's
a
webcam
people
can
see,
and
there
is
microphones
and
speakers
easily
available
for
other
remote
audience.
A
A
You
know
20
30
people
or
something
if
we
were
all
in
the
zoom
and
we
like
unmuted
when
we
were
speaking
if
that
would
have
at
least
helped
the
the
audience
I
know
it
can
get
challenging
when
multiple
people
are
unmuted
and
then
you
might
get
some
feedback
or
whatever,
but
it's
perhaps
worth
trialing.
We.
C
Also,
when
we
tried
that
at
the
board
meeting
the
it
really
only
worked,
if
there
were
no
speakers
playing
to
the
room,
meaning
everybody
has
to
have
something
in
their
ear
to
listen
and
then
the
unmuting
problems
aren't
so
bad.
So
we
could
do
that.
But,
like
that's
a
lot
of
you
know,
everyone
may
not
think
to
break
headphones.
Yeah.
A
It
would
take
some
kind
of
cat
hurting
if
you
will
right
to
get
that
working.
B
I
think
like
we,
we
can
probably
still
work
to
do
better,
but
I
I
in
terms
of
expectations,
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
get
like
it.
An
in-person
thing
is
never
gonna
be
as
good
for
remote
people
so
like.
If
we
really
wanted
to
be
optimized
for
remote,
it
should
all
be
remote.
Is
my
like
that
worked
well,
like
you
said
before
remote
everybody's,
once
you
bring
a
bunch
of
people
into
a
room,
we
can
kind
of
do
a
best
effort,
but
I
don't
think
so.
B
E
E
I
kind
of
agree,
but
I
think
there
so
we
I
know
we
had
smaller
rooms
in
front
of
our
main
room
like
five
or
four.
They
were
four
or
four
or
something
smaller
rooms
where
cdcon
were
doing
some
work,
and
I
I'm
thinking
if
we
could
move,
we
could
have
moved
to
that
record
that
one
with
just
a
lcd,
not
a
projector
as
a
big
lcd
tv
as
a
as
a
screen
for
sharing
and
and
the
host
can
also
share
their
screen.
E
Who
would
have
made
it
much
better?
As
I
was
so?
I
touched
the
screen
here,
a
small
picture
just
to
share
how
it
was.
I
think,
michael,
was
taking
down
the
notes,
but
no
one
could
see
it.
Some
people
did
open
the
dock
and
their
machine,
but
those
who
didn't
open
the
dog
they
couldn't
see
what's
happening.
So
I
think
there
are
a
few
things
which
can
be
done
and
relatively
easy,
which
will
improve
the
experience
for
for
the
audience
in
the
room
and
also
remotely
yeah
yeah.
B
C
B
E
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
you
know
a
circular
up
which
we
kind
of
had
in
that
photo.
A
But
not
everybody
was
in
the
circle
and
I
think
if
we
had
a
dedicated
remote
facilitator
in
each
room-
and
this
is
you
know
in
no
way
a
criticism
of
well
either
the
work
that
was
this
one
but
like
we
had
one
person
dedicated
to
that
and
like
really
was
focused
on
it,
and,
like
said,
oh
michael,
let's
make
sure
we
get
your
stuff
on
the
screen
and
I'll
be
in
the
middle
and
I'll
hand
the
mic
around,
and
you
know
really
try
to
facilitate
the
remote
aspect.
A
I
think
it
will
need
to
be
very
intentional
and,
and
have
somebody
dedicated
to
it.
D
So
the
this
is
by
no
means
a
just
us
sort
of
a
problem.
This
is
a
problem
everyone's
kind
of
facing,
so
I
think
there
are
some
pretty
obvious
technical
solutions
to
improving
at
least
the
audio
quality
like
well
like
having
a
single
mic
that
is
passed
around
and
then
is
pipes
through
both
in
the
room
and
to
the
remote
source
or
having
a
sound
system
from
a
remote
over
a
bike.
D
That's
passed
around
in
the
room
and
then
having
a
really
good,
separate
room
microphone
that
is
able
to
to
pick
up
all
of
that
and
pass
it
into
the
stream.
But,
as
we
were
relying
effectively
on,
I
believe
just
microphones
from
the
built
in
from
my
laptop.
Those
are
optimized
entirely
for
a
different
use
case.
So.
D
So
I
think,
if
we're
gonna
try
something
like
this
again,
then
possibly
spending
a
little
bit
of
money
on
a
good
room
mic
and
then
trusting
that
whatever
room
we're
in
has
sufficient
ways
of
you
know
having
the
sound
in
that
room
happen
properly
is
going
to
give
us
a
better
solution
that
we
have
now
and
we'll
be
in
a
better
position.
After
that
experience
of
figuring
out.
Do
we
want
something
more
or
is
that
like
sufficient
for
the
experience
that
we're
looking
to
provide
for
remote
participants.
E
A
good
point:
I've
listed
it
down
in
the
list.
Sorry
you
go
on
you,
you
were
about
to
say.
A
Well,
I
mean,
I
think
we
probably
should
move
on,
but
I
think
maybe
you
know
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
start
a
doc
or
something
that
you
would
keep
in
that
issue
or
if
we
want
to
just
add
some
of
these
notes
to
the
issue
itself.
It'd
be
good
to
capture
it
and
then
maybe
we'll
have
a
follow-up
meeting
once
the
foundation
folks
are
back
and
we
can
talk
more
about
it.
E
Make
sense
I
will
so
I
haven't,
I
created
a
new
issue
in
the
summit,
repo
I'll
I'll,
just
take
these
notes
and
put
them
in
the
issue,
and
we
can
reflect
back
on
them,
especially
especially
when
I
don't
know
michael
you
or
whoever
is
checking
for
the
people
to
to
have
the
rooms
for
the
next
summit.
E
B
Yeah,
it's
it's
good
to
have
a
list
of
a
wish
list,
yeah
which,
if
it's
there
great,
if
it's
not
not-
and
you
know
like
the
mic-
I
don't
know
if
you
can
get
like
a
good
conference
mic
that
plugs
into
a
laptop,
then
we
might
ask
for
some
like
support
from
the
foundation
to
fund
that
or
whatever
right
yeah.
I
think
that's
a
good
idea,
yeah,
but
yeah.
B
E
B
The
one
thing
I
thought
I'd
mention
just
while
we
have
a
few
people
just
to
share
their
thoughts,
is
like
in
past
ones.
We
kind
of
started
out
with
a
bit
of
a
planning
session
to
say,
like
okay,
people
had
proposed
sessions,
but
we
did
an
ad
hoc
like
hey.
Are
there
people
new
breakouts
that
people
want
to
do,
or
you
know
just
a
little
organizing
at
the
front
that
might
that
I
was
just
thinking
might
be
a
good
thing
to
plan
in
for
a
future.
One.
E
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
I
think
someone
also
mentioned
that
we
should
have
in
the
start.
Maybe
it
would
be
good
if
we
I
did
share
like
agenda
in
the
start,
but
not
not
in
detail.
So
someone
reflected
that
we
could
have
shared
few
points
of
each
item
that
is
being
talked
in
two
days
period,
so
they
can
get
more
into
what?
What
should
I
attend
and
think
so
that
that's
a
good
point?
I've
noted
down
planning
session
in
the
start
or
yeah
share.
B
I
think
it's
a
little,
you
know
it
comes
from
when
we
did
it
online
that
doesn't
make
as
much
sense,
but
now
that
we're
back
in
person,
you
know
you
can
get
the
vibe
of
hey.
Is
there
anything
we
should
be
talking
about?
We
didn't
get
into
the
agenda
beforehand,
and
so
I
think
it
fits
with
what
you
said
go
over
the
agenda
and
then
say:
hey
is
there
anything
else
we
should
include?
Do
people
want
to
have
a
if
we've
got
still
some
space
in
breakout
rooms?
E
A
All
right,
good,
good,
all
right
so
moving
on,
let's
we're
at
half
past
so.
B
A
Cool,
so
moving
on
the
next
issue
is
903.
This
open
call
for
nominations
for
secondary
cpc,
director
seats
and
as
jordan,
asked
and
michael
responded.
Michael
is
the
current
person
in
that
seat
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
michael,
but
as
it
says
here,
you're
not
planning
to
run
yeah.
B
A
I'm
wondering
do
we
have,
I
feel
like
we
had
documented
like
what
the
expectations
are,
but
I
can't
recall,
oh
here,
well,
there's
community
board
seat,
which
is
this
one
right.
So
we
should
maybe
add
this
to.
The
issue
is
expectations
of
the
community
board
of
directors
representatives.
This
is
in
the
cross
project
council,
repo
in
the
governance
directory.
A
A
She
joy
suggests
we
discuss
the
timeline
at
this
meeting.
I
do
know
that
at
the
top
level
of
the
directory
there
is
a
dates
and
reminders
file
which
says
the
director
election
director
2
term
ends
july
31st,
so
we'll
want
to.
You
know,
conduct
that
vote
through
july.
I
imagine
you
know,
nominations
and
voting
period.
C
I'm
still
waiting
for
clarity
from
robin
as
well
about
my
board
seat,
so
that
may
end
up
being
relevant.
C
Coinbase
on
in
the
board
seat,
it's
not
clear
to
me
if
I
finish
my
term
or
vacate
or
what
I'm
waiting
for
clarification
on
that.
A
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
I
guess
part
of
this
issue
is
discussing
the
timeline.
A
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
with
the
term
ending
july
31st
that
we
should
probably
kick
things
off,
you
know
in
the
next
week
or
two
for
nominations
and
let
that
go
for
two
weeks
and
then
voting
for
two
weeks
and
have
somebody
elected
before
the
end
of
july,
and
I
will
actually
since
I
have
that
handy.
I
will
add
this
to
the
list
too,
that
director
two
election
term
and
the
selector
first
oops,
give
me
one
quick
second
to
pop
this.
In
there
too,.
C
A
Excuse
me:
okay,
cool
I'll,
maybe
drop
a
note
in
there
or
if
someone
wants
to
drop
a
note
in
the
issue
on
timeline
expectations
roughly,
that
would
be
great
cool.
So
the
next
item
is
the
public
slides,
michael.
If
you
should
we
get
one,
the
grace
hopper
one.
Oh
you
wanna.
Sorry
did
I
skip
one
sorry.
B
A
You
know
I'm
just
going
to
say
really
quickly,
looking
at
the
timeline
for
the
board
seat
situation,
if
we
want
to
have
somebody
elected
before
the
first,
the
the
the
cpc
meeting
is
on
the
second,
so
we
decide
either
announce
on
that
date
or
if
we
wanted
to
do
the
the
session
before
that
it
would
be
the
19th
if
it
was
the
19th,
then
we
want
to
do
two
weeks
with
nominations
in
two
weeks
with
voting,
we
should
open
up
the
nominations
today.
D
A
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
a
good
point.
We
could
just
open
up
the
nominations
and
and
have
it
you
know
open
for
a
minimum
of
two
weeks
and
and
kind
of
figure
it
out
from
there.
B
B
A
C
D
E
E
C
Right
yeah,
that
would
seem
fine
with
me,
but
you
know
I
just
don't
know
either
way:
yeah,
okay,
but
but
either
way.
I
don't
think
that
that
clarity
needs
to
block
the
secondary
cpc
director
seat
in
any
way.
So
if
we
want
to
open
nominations
for
that
go
nuts.
D
But
I
think,
if
you
have
an
interest
in
possibly
continuing
representing
a
different
constituency,
then
I
think
we
should
explicitly
not
make
a
call
of
exactly
two
weeks,
for
instance,
for
the
period
of
nominations,
but
at
least
two
weeks-
and
this
gives
time
for
for
more
information
on
your
position
to
be
gathered
so
that
we
can
make
a
more
informed
decision
about
when
to
actually
end
the
call
for
nominations
or
whatever
or
there's.
Also,
the
fact
that
I
don't
think
technically.
D
There's
anywhere
in
the
board
seat
descriptions
a
requirement
that
a
single
person
cannot
hold
multiple
seats
at
the
same
time,
because
we
don't
have
that
for
the
cpc
and
I
kind
of
almost
ended
up
in
that
position.
The
last
time
we
did
votes
about
this.
D
So
so,
if
you
want
to
play
it
safe
and
keep
a
bald
seat,
you
should
you
know,
try
and
hop
in
to
run
for
this
and
then
possibly
end
up
with
two
seats.
But
this
is
possibly
also
me
playing
silly
buggers
with
technicalities,
and
that
might
be
more
my
thing
than
the
other
thing.
So
yeah.
C
B
A
All
right-
and
I
will
comment
on
the
board
seat
issue,
saying
that
you
know
we'll
open
up
nominations
it'll
be
open
for
a
minimum
of
two
weeks,
but
potentially
four,
which
then
we
would
close.
We
would
announce
the
winner
on
the
second,
which
I
think
is
fine.
You
know
the
day
after
the
term
ends
or
whatever
I
could
hold
on
for
an
extra
day.
A
Great
all
right
cool,
so
I'll
work
on
that
afterwards
and
we
we
can
move
on
so
then
the
next
one
is
the
grace
hopper
open
source
day,
which
I
don't
know.
If
anyone
else
can
comment
on
this,
the
only
thing.
B
I
can
comment
is
I
know
that
there's
a
few
people
from
the
node
project,
yeah
richard,
I
think
who
are
yeah,
who
are
getting
together
to
to
help
help
out
and
to
do
something
on
that
day.
So
that's
good
to
hear.
A
Yeah,
I
believe
it's
already.
I
think
kahil
already
submitted
node
and
they've,
responded
and
said
that
they're
they're
really
excited
about
it.
So
so
that's
great
cool
yeah.
I
I'm
not
clear
on
the
details,
but
I
saw
kind
of
those
bits
as
they
came
through
now.
A
A
So
I
say
we
just
leave
it
open
until
next
time
and
we
get
clarity
then,
and
then
you
know
we'll
do
whatever
that's
my
suggestion,
especially
since
we're
running
out
of
time-
and
I'm
gonna
sure
do
this,
although
you
know
maybe
that's
kind
of
the
situation
with
a
couple
more
of
these
because,
like
the
next
one
is
the
pull
request.
851
on
the
update
contributor
covenant
code
of
conduct,
I
feel
like
we
keep
talking
about
this
as
well.
B
Then
it
was,
you
know
if
and
then
continue
to
discuss
whether
we
think
you
know
having
it
needs
to
be
tweaked
for
our
particular
use
case
as
a
separate
because,
like
we
haven't
changed,
we
haven't
tweaked
it
and
so
like
tweaking.
It
should
be
an
intentional
yeah.
We're
gonna
make
tweaks
versus,
and
I
think
we
were
kind
of
you
know.
The
discussion
was,
you
could
interpret
it
either
way
so
landing
it.
As
is
didn't,
didn't
bind
us
to
one
thing
or
the
other.
A
Yeah,
that's
kind
of
how
I
remember
it
too,
but
I'm
not.
I
don't
know
if
we
should
do
anything
on
it
right
now
and
I'll
try
to
look
at
it
and
maybe
look
through
our
notes
and
kind
of
get
what
I
understand
to
be
the
clarity
and
how
we'll
move
forward
and
then
I'll
either
comment
in
the
issue
or
bring
it
to
the
meeting
next
time
or
both
try
to
get
on
top
of
this
one.
Okay,
just
to
move
it
forward,
right,
cool.
A
The
next
one
is
the
javascript
security
collab
space,
which
has
been
approved
and
announced.
I
was
talking
with
jory.
She
was
going
to
do
something.
I
think
she
was
going
to
open
up
the
repo
and
get
a
doodle
going
for
a
meeting
time.
A
So
those,
I
think,
are
the
two
next
steps,
I'm
scrolling
through
our
slack
here,
which
I
don't
see,
but
so
we'll
we'll
get
this
going
very
soon.
It's
been
a
little
hectic
with
the
events
happening
and
I'm
buying
a
house
and
selling
out.
A
So
I'm
a
little
overwhelmed
at
the
moment,
but
trying
to
get
these
important
things
done
so
more
progress
on
that
one
very
soon,
oh-
and
I
think
jory
was
saying
that
for
folks
that
are
interested
for
the
time
being
we're
pointing
them
to
the
security
slack
channel
on
openjs
that
will,
you
know,
communicate
updates
there
for
the
time
being
and
we'll
start
to
get
the
the
ball
officially
rolling
cool.
A
That
is
that's
license,
check,
support
and
tooling.
I
have
to
assume
there
are
no
updates
on
this.
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
issue.
A
So
and
everybody
from
the
lf
is
out-
and
I
think
also
on
this
last
one
issue-
786
clarify
requirements
around
coc
violation.
I
I
don't
think
that
there
are
any
updates
on
this,
but
I
know
you
know
at
the
event
we
were
we're
talking
about.
You
know
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
in
this
space.
A
So
I
know
it
is
top
of
mind
and
I
expect
there
will
be
progress
happening
there
soon.
A
So
that
finishes
the
agenda.
I'm
opening
up
the
dates
and
reminders,
there's
nothing.
Oh
actually
there
is
this
excuse,
my
chime.
There
are
the
two
other
items
here:
the
cpc
impact
voting
member
election.
Please
chime,
stop
china
cpc
impact
voting
member
selection.
The
term
ends
july
31st,
cpc,
non-impact,
voting
member,
sorry
that
was
selection
and
then
cpc
non-impact
voting
member
election.
A
That
term
ends
july
31st
as
well.
So
there
are
a
couple
other
things
that
we
need
to
move
forward
as
well.
So.
D
Doesn't
this
mean
that
if
we're
opening
up
the
the
the
board
vote,
we
should
also,
in
fact
now
open
up
the
nominations
for
the
non-impact
representatives.
A
A
If
you
will
the
impact
voting,
member
selection
choices
and
and
representatives
so,
okay,
I
will
take
an
action
item
of
sorts
to
open
an
issue
on
each
of
those
two
things
as
well
and
get
those
balls
rolling
and
the
other
thing
that
we
should
do
before
we
wrap
up
this
meeting
is
see
if
there
are
any
initiatives
or
agenda
items
that
we
should
use
a
working
session
for
to
get
further
progress
on.
A
I
think
it
wouldn't
be
bad
to
work
on
these
two
code
of
conduct
and
and
yeah
the
code
of
conduct
violation
requirements
as
well
as
the
contributor
covenant
code
of
conduct.
Work,
maybe
use
the
next
session
to
move
those
both
forward
specifically-
and
I
think
you
know
the
contributor
covenant
code
of
conduct.
A
Probably
you
know
we
can
at
least
make
progress
on
that
pull
request
without
too
much
trouble
if
we
kind
of
separate
out
some
of
the
changes,
but
once
we
start
digging
into
the
requirements
around
the
violation
and
any
moderation
efforts,
you
know
that's
where
we
could
spend
a
chunk
of
time.
A
A
D
My
guess
is
that
it's
bringing
it
on
people
now,
because
this
will
probably
it
ought
to
involve
some
of
the
people
that
are
not
here
on
this
call
yeah.
The
likelihood
I
would
say
is
high
that
the
attendance
next
week
would
be
relatively
low.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
we
should
I
I'll
try
to
talk
to
jory
and
robin
about
it
soon
and
if,
if
we're
on
an
agreement
to
do
that
on
the
next
working
session,
we
can
try
to
you
know
socialize
with
other
members
what
our
plan
is
and
then
try
to
get
folks
to
attend,
and
this
is
the
later
time
period,
which
I
guess
is
not
as
good
for
european
folks.
I'm
trying
to
remember
if,
like
toby,
is
normally
on
the
later
time
or
the
earlier
time.
A
I
know
we
got
you
know
christian
and
emily
and
walid.
Actually,
a
bunch
of
you
know
folks,
folks
in
that
direction,
because
the
working
session
would
be
at
this
time
slot
as
well.
A
All
right!
Well,
we'll
see
I'll
I'll.
I
I
propose
that
I
will
talk
with
people
about
making
that
happen
and
we'll
see
what
we
can
do.
A
A
Ending
early
sounds
good
yeah
me
too
I'll
start
working
on
some
of
those
things
cool
all
right.
Well,
I
appreciate
you
all
showing
up
and
doing
the
work,
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
soon
talk
to
you.