►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Cool
all
right,
I
think
we're
live
people
thanks
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
the
6th
of
october
and
yeah.
Thanks
everybody
for
joining.
A
Let's
get
right
into
some
announcements,
shall
we
and
jewelry
sent
us
over
a
note
she's
in
the
ekma
meetings,
as
well
as
jordan,
but
joey
sent
some
announcements
here.
It's
a
bit
quiet,
she
says,
but
amfest
is
on
october
13th
and
the
amp
tsc
ama
is
on
the
14th.
A
So
those
are
a
couple
of
dates
for
your
calendar,
it's
in
like
a
week,
and
I
can
share
this
link
with
the
chat
and
maybe
throw
it
into
get.
Oh,
I
see
a
bunch
of
people
on
hang
on.
Let
me
promote.
A
And
then
all
the
modal
windows
get
in
my
way
to
do
more,
promoting
please
all
right,
great
yeah,
so
fest
mtsc
drop
the
link
in
there
as
well
in
the
in
the
meeting
minutes.
A
So
those
are
a
couple
of
announcements.
Is
there
anything
else
rachel
did
you
have
something
you
wanted
to
announce
as
well.
B
Sure
the
electron
project
has
put
out
a
usage
survey.
So
if
you
are
interested
in
that
we
tweeted
about
it
this
morning
and
so
did
electron.
So
if
that's
of
interest
of
you
please
go
check
that
out.
A
C
It's
like
developer
tools
around
around
the
product.
A
D
C
A
Is
the
plan
to
have
the
event
in
june
or
july?
What's
up.
E
That's
right:
the
original
dates
were
june,
9th
and
10th.
It
looks
like
we
probably
will
stick
with
those
dates
we
had
discussed
with
the
program
committee
a
week
prior,
but
that
in
the
us
is
memorial
weekend
that
monday,
so
we'll
likely
keep
that
early
june
date,
but
we'll
be
yeah
figuring
out
the
path
forward
on
that.
So.
A
Great
keep
us
posted.
Thank
you.
I
got
nothing
planned
so
state
of
the
world
yeah.
That's
right,
yeah
cool!
So
with
that
with
all
that,
so
we
can
jump
into
the
agenda
unless
there's
anything
else
to
discuss
cool.
If
not
first
agenda
item
is,
should
we
have
a
lightweight
mechanism
to
spin
off
ad
hoc
cpc
working
groups?
I
think
that
we
had
yeah
mike
samuel
commented.
Oh
commented
now
you
want
to
share
your
comment
with
the
group
mike.
F
Sure,
just
the
the
comment
is
just
one,
whether
an
about
labeling,
to
avoid
the
scenario
where
somebody
invests
a
lot
of
effort
in
a
lightweight
committee,
assuming
that
the
cpc
has
already
kind
of
reached
consensus
that
you
know
whatever
the
committee
is
producing
will
be
used
unless
there's
you
know,
like
some
obvious
problems
with
it,
and
so
you
know,
because
this
lightweight
process
doesn't
doesn't
isn't
based
on
kind
of
consensus,
that
the
goals
of
the
committee
are
something
that
the
larger
organization
wants
to
wants
to
use
it.
F
It
seems
right
for
for
these
kinds
of
mismatches,
which
can
lead
to
bad
feelings
and
and
contributors
leaving.
So
I
wonder
whether
any
kind
of
labeling
might
kind
of
head
that.
A
Off
yeah,
that's
a
good,
a
good
point
to
raise.
A
I
I
wonder
if,
with
the
amount
of
activity
in
the
cpc
which
you
know,
isn't
a
crazy
amount,
if
you
know
this
sort
of
stuff
would
be
visible
and-
and
we
could
make
sure
that
we
didn't
run
into
situations
like
that.
F
I
think
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
somebody
might
spin
up
an
exploratory
committee
and
then
start
talking
about
this
committee
to
try
to
to
get
interested
people
to
to
contribute
and
those
you
know
and
and
those
people
coming
in
after
the
committee
has
been
spun
up,
probably
you
know
would
not
be,
would
not
have
the
sense
of
the
room
that
somebody
who
had
been
in
the
cs,
pc
committees
would
have,
and
so
you
know
calling
in
an
exploratory
committee
or
or
a
lightweight
committee.
F
G
A
G
F
A
Okay,
well,
I
I
I
think
these
are
good
things
to
to
raise
and
again
we
can
kind
of
iterate
on
on
like
a
meeting
issue
and
see
what's
working
and
what's
not
working.
Perhaps
I.
A
Brad,
can
you
share
it
with
the
group.
G
Yeah,
what
he
said
is
perhaps
it's
finally
time
to
move
the
normal
cpc
meetings
to
the
bi-weekly
and
to
use
every
other
tuesday
for
a
working
group
session,
which
is
sort
of
like
the
ultra
lightweight
version
of
that
yeah.
A
A
You
know
we're
talking
about
timing
earlier
and
in
terms
of
you
know
what
what
time
the
meetings
are
happening
and
if
we
were
alternating,
then
one
time
would
be
for
the
regular
meeting
and
one
time
would
be
for
a
working
meeting,
and
I
think
that
it
would
perhaps
require
a
little
bit
of
you
know:
leg
work
beforehand
to
make
sure
that
whatever
the
working
meeting
was
was
you
know
functional,
and
we
had
you
know
an
agenda
or
what
have
you
had
it
all
set
up.
A
Which,
I
think
is
maybe
different
than
than
this
issue
the
the
the
emily
suggestion.
So
perhaps
we
should
even
have
another
issue
that
proposes
this
sort
of
question
and
what
sort
of
spins
out
of
that
like.
If
we
were
to
go
bi-weekly
and
alternate
with
the
working
session.
D
I
think
it's
related
in
the
sense
of
I
think
toby
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
you're
just
like
it's,
it's
a
bunch
of
work
to
try
and
spin
out,
like
a
one-time
meeting
like
even
just
finding
a
time
that
fits
for
the
whole
group
can
be
a
challenge
like
that's.
Where
I
find
the
most
of
the
work
is
right,
so
emily's
suggestion
of
you
know
reusing
the
same
slot.
D
You
know
you
have
in
your
calendar,
so
I
I
see
it
is
related
in
that
sense
and
either
the
other
every
alternate
or
you
know,
there's
also
the
approach
of
like
the
second
half
of
each
meeting
can
be
like
the
first
half
is
to
to
sort
of
do
what
we
do,
which
is
go
through
the
issues
that
are
tagged
and
then
the
second
half
can
be
reserved
for
like
a
longer
deep
dive
on
some
topic
right
and
people
can
leave
if
they're
not
interested.
In
that
second
half.
G
A
G
G
Open,
let's
give
it
a
try
next
time,
something
like
this
pops
up,
let's
book
half
an
hour
for
it
or
like
I
mean
I
feel
like
it
worked
well
for
the
the
other
issues
that
we
had.
Let's,
let's
just
give
that
a
try.
A
All
right
cool,
if
somebody
want
to
maybe
drop
that
into
the
issue
and
we'll
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item.
A
G
A
All
right
cool,
easy
enough,
encourage
folks
to
take
a
look
at
those
still.
Next
item
is
add
examples
of
successful
applications.
I
think
this
one
also
we're
just
waiting
for
maybe
some
stuff
from
from
you
robin
about
other
applications
that
we
might
want
to
include
here.
A
Thank
you
robin
cool,
moving
right
along
simplify
proposal
process.
This
again
just
needs
somebody
to
start
our
pr
doesn't
even
need
to
be
a
perfect
pr,
but
get
the
ball
rolling
and
we
can
kind
of
iterate
there
yeah.
A
So
if
anybody
has
options
here,
if
anybody
has
a
moment
and
can
kind
of
take
a
peek
at
this,
I
think
you
know
we're
simplifying
things.
So,
hopefully
it's
it's,
not
a
big
undertaking
and
even
just
getting
it
started,
we
can
start
to
iterate
through
the
pr
process.
That'd
be
great
if
I
find
time
I'll
I'll
try
to
take
a
look
at
this
myself.
A
C
But
yeah,
so
I
I
can
at
least
give
kind
of
a
sense
of
timeline
here.
I
have
excuse
me
something
that
I
need
to
get
taken
care
of
here
for
another
project
which
is
well
for
jquery,
which
is
bump
this
one
a
little
bit
out,
but
I
will
just
say:
the
board
has
approved
the
new
cla
templates,
they've
also
approved
icla.
Only
if
anybody
would
like
me
to
get
their
projects
set
up,
then
they
already
know
that
they
want
to
use
the
cla
just
reach
out
it.
C
It's
not
going
to
take
any
time
at
all
to
get
that
done
as
far
as
writing
is
up,
I
think,
probably
within
a
week
or
two
there's
reasonable
expectation.
D
C
Yeah,
so
that
actually
is
something
I
can
take
care
of
really
quickly
here.
It's
just
just
to
give
everybody
context.
We,
the
the
clas,
are
kind
of
casually
mentioned
and
in
passing
in
the
in
the
iep
policy
as
being
something
which
projects
can
choose
to
do
if
they
decide
not
to
go
with
the
baseline,
which
is
to
use
the
dco.
C
We
don't
need
to
make
a
change
to
the
ip
policy
specifying
that
you
can
use
icla.
Only
that's
just
a
clarifying
thing,
and
I
can
put
that
on
the
on
the
page,
which
does
describe
the
clas,
it's
cla.openjs.org.
C
G
Small
clarification-
probably
let
me
add
like
where
are
we
collecting
this
information.
C
D
G
We
had
we
closed
the
it
was.
D
G
Mentioned
no,
it
was
sort
of
mentioned
in
another
issue
that
we
closed.
Okay,
it's
it's
more
that
there's
now
a
brian
mentioned
that
he
had.
He
had
to
change
some
of
the
text
on
his
side
on
the
website
itself
and
the
ip
guidance
probably
needs
like
a
tiny
small
tweak
to
it.
I
just
wanted
to
like
keep
a
note
of
that.
We
need
to
do
that
somewhere
so
that
it's
just
like.
We
know
that
we
have
to
do
it.
A
Cool
welcome
jory
thanks
for
joining.
I
know
you're
busy
today.
A
I
will
also
add
two
that
I
forgot
to
mention
in
the
announcements
that
today
is
also
the
standards
meeting.
Another
announcement
there
cool
we
good
to
move
on
from
from
that
issue.
A
So
there's
nothing
else.
The
next
one
is
develop
annual
review
process
for
projects
we've
been
working
on
this
a
bit
any
updates,
perhaps
toby.
On
your
end,.
A
No
worries
issue
592.
This
is
a
review
process
for
projects
trying
to
look
to
see
last
notes
and
and
prs
and
stuff.
G
Yeah,
so
so
I
think
we
have
like
the
two
next
steps:
we're
on
top
of
the
project,
onboarding
representation
name
to
project
status.
We
did
that
the
pro
request
to
create
for
the
growth
projects
we
did
now.
G
The
question
is:
do
we
want
to
go
beyond
because,
like
the
original
request
from
emily
was
to
target
not
only
growth
projects
but
more
broadly
old
projects,
and
we
haven't,
we
haven't
tackled
the
whole
projects,
but,
to
be
very
honest
like
this
is
really
not
at
the
top
of
my
priority
list
of
like
some
someone
else
cares
about
this.
I
I
think
someone
should
run
with
it
because
I
will
not
get
to
it
for
a
while.
A
G
D
D
Yeah
yeah,
well
that,
yes,
not
not
directing
other
people
but
actually
yeah,
leading
and
doing
sorry
I'll
say
doing
the
work
on
the
growth.
Like
I
don't
know,
I'd
be
I'm
almost
like.
I,
I
think
it's
okay.
If
we
figure
out
the
growth
plan
piece
first
and
then
once
we
complete
that
loop
back
to
the
the
overall
process,
unless
somebody
else
you
know,
has
a
strong
desire
to
step
up
and
lead
that
right
now,.
A
G
Yeah,
I
think
that,
like
the
learning
that
we
can
get
out
of
doing
it
for
the
growth
projects
is
actually
like
valuable
and
then
we
know
we
can
bring
this
back
to
a
broader
conversation.
G
We
just
probably
want
to
either
decide
to
keep
this
one
open
or
have
a
dedicated
issue
for
the
other
thing,
depending
on
whether
we
want
to
close
this
one
or
not.
D
G
Oh,
I
was
seeing
it
just
the
other
way,
but
yeah
that
works
too,
whichever
you're
more
comfortable
with
maybe
splitting
those
up
is
a
good
idea.
So
then
we
can
finish
the
growth
part
close
one
of
them
and
have
the
other
one
open.
That's
maybe
not
on
the
that's
lingering
somewhere,
rather
than
like
a
weekly
agenda.
D
A
Okay
sounds
good
cool.
Moving
on
the
last
item
on
the
agenda
here
is
the
government
changes
for
collaboration
network
so
there's
an
update
there,
michael.
D
Yeah
latest
update
brian,
let
me
know,
is
that
it's
actually
been
approved,
so
the
boats,
the
votes
complete
since
once
we
tallied
up
the
numbers
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
land
those
things
and
we
can
consider
it
complete
great
yay
yeah
and
I'm
working
on
we'll
see.
But
I'm
working
on
a
team
to
see
if
they're
interested
in
starting
off
the
first
one.
A
Great
great,
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
cool.
That
is
the
agenda,
and
what
do
you
know?
It's
only
12
28.
So
if
we
did
have
a
working
session,
we'd
have
plenty
of
time
to
to
do
that
anything.
We
want
to
discuss
further
or
work
on
today.
D
One,
I
think,
think
that
I
was
reminded
of
it
the
other
day.
Maybe
we
don't
need
the
30
minutes,
but
since
we
have
time
we
we'd
had
a
few
sessions
talking
about
the
escalation
process
for
the
code
of
conduct,
and
I
think
we'd
come
to
consensus
on
on
that.
But
I
don't
think
we've
updated
the
the
like
our
docs
or
anything
like
that.
So
I
can't
remember
if
anybody
had
an
action
to
do
that
or
kind
of
what,
where
our
next
steps
were
to
close,
that
one
out
was.
A
That's
a
good
question:
I'm
I'm
not
sure
where
we
left
that
and
it's
an
important
question.
A
Do
we
want
to
have
a
way
to
have
perhaps
a
label,
that's
for
like
a
potential
working
session
in
times
like
these,
when
we
have
a
half
hour
and
want
to
hack
on
something.
D
It
there
should
be
some
way
to
let
people
know
in
advance.
That
basically
is
like
hey.
This
is
the
plan
for
the
next
week's
one,
and
maybe
it's
that
we
need
to
agree
in
the
previous
meeting.
What
the
next
one
would
be
to
give
people
a
week's
notice
and
it
can
be
in
the
minutes
right
yeah,
it's
a
good
idea.
I
just
worry
that,
like
you
know,
the
issue
is
only
open,
perhaps
a
couple
days
before,
and
it
may
be
too
late
at
that
point
for
people
to
think
so.
D
Yeah
you
know
maybe
do
any
ideas
of
what
we'd
want
working
session
to
be
next
week.
If
we
wanted
to
do
one.
A
Some
ideas
are
the
escalation
path,
make
sure
that's
that
squared
away
and
any
other
code
of
conduct
work
that
needs
to
happen.
You
know,
there's
there's
more
aspects
of
the
review
process
that
that
we
could
be
fleshing
out.
A
D
D
D
D
A
D
I
might
borrow
a
few
minutes.
I
just
I'd,
sent
an
email
out
to
the
project
maintainers
list
kind
of
asking
as
the
community
director.
If
there
was
you
know
something
that
made
sense
in
terms
of
getting
together
or
you
know,
trying
to
better
have
you
know
having
a
way
where
I
could
communicate
with
them
or
meet
with
them
periodically.
D
I
didn't
get
any
feedback,
so
I
was
just
wondering,
since
we
have
representatives
from
another
number
of
projects
here,
if
there's
any
thoughts
like
maybe
it's
not
needed,
since
we
have
cpc
representatives
who
can
bring
that
perspective
in
as
well.
D
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
you
know
if
there
isn't,
you
know
if
there
is
any
desire
or
ask
that
you
know
I
I
figure
out
what
that
is
and
do
it.
You
know
a
concrete
example
is
when
we're
discussing
moving
from
the
node.js
having
a
seat.
They
were.
You
know,
one
of
the
asks
was
like.
Could
somebody
still
come
and
give
us
board
updates
right?
D
So
if
there's
some
other
projects
that
say,
hey
we'd,
really
like
that
I'd
be
happy
to
do
those
kinds
of
things.
But
you
know
maybe
just
planting
the
seed
here
to
think
a
little
bit
about
that
and
reach
out
to
me.
And
let
me
know
if
you
have
some
suggestions,
what
you
think
the
projects
you're
involved
in
what
would
like,
or
even
you
know
something
completely
different.
A
Maybe
there's
something
to
consider
adding
to
jory's.
You
know
regular
email
updates
too.
I
mean,
I
think
she
probably
covers
a
lot
of
it,
but
it
certainly
could
be
an
easy
way
for
any
information
you
have
to
to
go
out,
although
maybe
the
audience
might
be
different,
maybe.
D
You
know
just
trying
to
figure
out
how,
in
this
role
I
can
I
can
do
that
effectively.
I
know
for
the
node
project,
I'm
involved,
so
I
know
directly
right,
but
in
the
other
projects
they
don't
have
that
I
I
mean
we
do
have
the
cpc
rep.
So
it
could
be
that
that's
already
well
covered,
I'm
just
exploring
what
makes
sense
being
new
to
the
this
particular
role.
A
Should
we
have
a
slack
channel
that
would
be
an
obvious
place
that
people
could
go
to
if
they
did
have
something
as
well.
I
mean
it
probably
wouldn't
be
very
active,
but
it's
another
thought
yeah.
No,
that's
a
that's
one!
One
path.
A
D
G
Go
ahead,
while
we
on
the
topic
of
improving
communication
channels
between
projects
and
cpc,
slash
board
chris
and
myself
also
have
a
similar
role
in
the
cpc.
It
would
maybe
be
useful
if,
like
all
of
this
was
in
the
same
channel
somehow.
D
G
Because
I
mean
I
agree,
like
I
saw
your
email,
I'm
sorry,
I
was
doing
a
pull
request
instead
of
listening
to
what
you
were
saying,
michael,
but
I
saw
your
pull
request
on
the
topic
of
always
a
while
back.
Did
you
get
like
input
on
this.
D
G
I
mean
you
know
to
some
degree
like
when
I
was
elected
in
in
the
position
I
have
on
the
cpc.
I
wanted
to
do
something
similar
and
didn't
really
know
how
to
go
about
it
and
then
like
covet
happened
and
a
whole
bunch
of
things
happened.
I
just
like
didn't
do
anything,
but
but
I
do.
I
do
think
that
we
should
do
something,
because
it's
kind
of
you
know
fun
that
we
get
to
have
a
vote
right.
D
Yeah
I
had
like
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
I
put
in
there
is
like.
We
could
easily
set
up
a
quarterly
meeting
if
people
you
know
want
to
get
together,
or
you
know
things
like
that,
like
there's,
there's
the
different
channels,
I
like
the
slack
channel,
is
a
good
one.
You
can
have
things
like
a
regular
meeting,
because
sometimes
people,
you
know
it's
easier
to
show
up
for
an
hour
meeting
them
to
put
together
to
think
about
what
your
concerns
are
and
put
it
into
into
an
email
documenting
the
channels
like.
D
D
Maybe
well
yeah,
we've
still
got
time,
so
we
can
just
use
this
time
so
yeah
so
like
that's.
What
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
is
what
projects
might
think
is
useful
right
because
again,
if
they're
just
like
we're
happy,
we
don't
need
anything
yeah.
We
know
who
you
are
we'll.
If
there's
a
problem
we'll
let
you
know
I
don't
want
to
consume
anybody's
time
or
effort
or
whatever
by
keep
asking
them
hey.
G
You
know
I
mean
actually
I
I
was.
I
ended
up
as
a
representative
of
the
amp
project
to
actually
reach
out
to
you
and
chris
around
the
icla
topic
and
we
had
a
meeting
and
that
was
extremely
useful.
D
G
And
so
I
mean
obviously
like
there's
an
access
thing
that
I
had,
but
you
actually
offered
to
do
this
right.
You're,
like
oh,
you
know,
I
don't
really
understand
this
issue.
Let's
have
a
conversation
about
it
and
even
though
I
had
the
access
I
I
felt
that
this
was
a
really
big
opportunity,
so
you
know
actually
just
even
saying
that
right
and
creates
the
you
know.
Yeah
creates
the
door
like
opens
the
door
to
people
actually
doing
something
and
reaching
out
so
oh
yeah.
G
Now
that
you,
you
know
we're
talking
about
this.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
some
kind
of
like
thing
where
people
could
just
show
up
and
have
a
discussion
like
some
way
that
people
can
reach.
E
G
D
D
To
close
that
gap,
so
I
mean
I
could
just
do
something
like
you
know
pick
you
know,
do
a
couple
things.
One
is
like
just
set
a
an
hour
every
quarter
or
something
that
says
hey.
If
you
want
to
show
up
there's
a
time
you
can
just
show
up
and
then
you
know
say
in
addition,
you
know
if
there's
ever
an
issue
here
you
can,
you
can
reach
out
to
me
and
you
know,
and
then
the
second.
D
A
It
might
not
be
bad
too,
michael
to
sorry
toby
real
quickly,
maybe
like
a
week
before
each
board
meeting,
you
send
a
note
out
to
the
projects
and
say:
hey:
we
have
a
board
meeting
in
a
week.
If
there's
anything,
you
need.
E
A
Address
and
then
you
can
also
include
you
know,
my
door
is
always
open.
I
have
this
heavily
meeting.
It
could
be
even
a
forum
email
that
goes
out
every
time,
but
at
least
the
projects
would
then
know.
Oh
yeah,
I
get
these
emails,
I'm
kind
of
used
to
them.
I
delete
them,
but
oh
this
one
time
you
know.
D
I
got
something
that's
on
my
on
my
mind,
right
yeah,.
G
H
Yes,
it
may
be
like
unclear
from
the
perspective
of
a
project
maintainer
like
why
they
would
need
to
ask
the
board
anything,
and
so
you
know
that
I
don't
know
about
how
how
to
go
about
explaining.
Well,
you
can
go
to
the
cpc
for
x,
y
and
z,
but
the
board
needs
to
consider.
You
know
these
things.
H
You
know,
I
I
don't
recall
the
the
text
of
that
mail
that
you
sent
michael,
but
I
did
read
it
and
I
don't
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
just
like
well.
Does
anybody
need
anything
or
was
it
more
like?
This
is
what
I
can
do
for
you
like
and
then
bullet
points
of
of,
like
a
list
of
of
offers.
You
could
take
me
up
on
because,
like
it
just
it
just
might
be
easier
that
way.
If
people
don't
know
like
what
what
they
can
ask
you
to
do.
D
Yeah,
it
was
more,
it
was
more
of
an
ask
in
terms
of
like
hey,
you
know
I
I've,
I,
I
fulfilled
the
role
for
the
node
project.
I
know
their
issues
and
concerns
very
well,
because
I'm
involved
and
I've
been
able
to
represent
those
at
the
board.
What
would
be
useful
for
people
in
terms
of
you
know,
helping
me
understand
them
this
this
those
kinds
of
issues
in
the
projects
you
know
would
we
wanted?
I
could
you
know,
for
example,
I've
shown
up
at
the
at
the
cpc,
sorry
at
the
tc
in
comcom
meetings.
D
D
I
do
take
your
point,
though,
that
it's
not
obvious,
because
I
think
most
of
the
time
the
answers
the
projects
really
don't
need
to
talk
to
the
board
right
like
it's,
it's
meant
to
be
that
the
cpc
will
handle
most
of
the
things
and
and
that
projects
mostly
run
run
on
their
own
anyway.
So
it's
it's
kind
of
the
exceptional
case
right.
H
D
G
Michael,
I
mean
I
don't
know
what
you
think
chris,
but
shouldn't
be
shouldn't.
The
three
of
us
that
have
representative
roles
be
working
on
something
like
that
together.
Yes,
I
mean
I
could
even
imagine
that
we
could
do
like
a
rolling
sort
of
like
office
hour
or
something
like
that
that
we,
you
know,
yeah
something
like
that.
D
G
Because
to
some
degree
the
thing
is,
like
a
you
know,
a
project
tsc
doesn't
necessarily
know
whether
something
needs
to
be
handled
by
the
cpc
or
the
board,
and
so
we
should
probably
be
the
ones
triaging
triaging
those
those
questions,
rather
than
expect
them
to
know
whether
they
need
to
talk
to
you
or
to
chris
and
myself.
A
Yeah,
if
you
have
a
a
regular
meeting
like
that,
feel
free
to
invite
me-
and
you
know,
even
if
the
nobody
shows
up
we
could
we
could,
we
could
think
about
ways
that
we
could
benefit
the
projects
more
in
general
and
kind
of
work,
use
it
as
a
working
session.
If
nobody
shows
up
to
ask
questions.
D
Is
the
representative
of
the
cpc,
so
he
should
be
in
touch
with
the
cpc
members
that
you
know
if
there's
something
that
the
cpc
wants
to
have
go
to
the
board.
He
would
be
the
channel
for
that,
not
that
he
couldn't
be
involved
in
this,
but
just
thinking
but
based
on
the
way
the
rules
are
outlined.
That
would
be
my
understanding.
D
A
Yeah
great
cool,
all
right,
13
minutes
left.
We
want
to
call
it
a
wrap,
or
does
anybody
have
anything
else
they
want
to
chat
about
or
anything
else.
E
D
D
The
thought
is
that
the
individual
support
program
isn't
tied
to
that
seat
and
that
their
you
know
from
the
discussion
is
not
something
we
want
tied
to
that
seat.
So
we're
basically
saying
the
cpc
no
longer
needs
an
individual
membership
program.
You
know
it's
not
the
way
to
go.
It's
this
individual
supporter
program,
the
third
seat.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
be
tied
to
that.
So
we're
deleting
the
references
to
that.
So,
basically,
let's
get
rid
of
the
individual
membership
program
and
replace
with
the
supporter
program.
D
What
that
does
leave
is
the
bylaws
having
a
reference
to
a
third
seat
for
an
individual
member
membership
program
which
we're
never
going
to
actually
spin
up,
and
so
the
seat
wouldn't
activate
as
the
current
wording.
So
as
a
totally
separate
discussion,
there'll
be
proposals
and
jory
and
robin
we're
going
to
work
with
the
cpc
for
a
proposal
that
says
well.
D
How
do
we
recast,
you
know
what
we
think
makes
sense
for
that
seat
and
have
the
bylaws
updated
and
all
that,
but,
but
you
know
in
the
first
case
we're
just
saying:
okay,
what
we're
proposing
here
just
doesn't
relate
to
that.
So,
let's
take
out
the
references
to
it.
It's
kind
of
like
the
cpc
is
saying
thank
you
board
for
chartering
us,
giving
us
some
responsibility,
but
that's
not
the
way.
We
think
we
need
to
go.
We
want
to
go
this
other
way.
I
Yeah,
I
think
that
coloring
fest
could
look
use
a
look
and
also,
I
think
something
that
would
be
helpful
for
me-
is
to
understand
next
steps.
So
my
plan
is
to
reach
out
to
robin
and
jory
and
whoever
else
is
interested,
so
we
can
just
talk
about
how
we
want
to
roll
it
out
and
what
what
the
timeline
is
that
we're
looking
at.
E
Yeah-
and
I
think
essentially,
we'll
just
have
the
board
sign
off
on
just
the
wording
on
the
charter
change,
which
should
be
pretty
fast,
rachel,
and
I
are
already
working
with
our
creative
agency
to
come
up
with
some
branding
ideas.
So
I
think
jory
is
putting
together
a
scheduling
doodle
and
what
else
then,
we
should
probably
be
close
to
launching
at
the
end
of
the
month,
which.
E
D
Guess
the
ask
would
be
for
all
the
cpc
members
to
take
a
look
at
that
before
say
what
is
today.
Today's
tuesday,
like
whatever,
is
reasonable.
You
know
it
would
be
nice
to
set
get
the
boat.
The
vote
started
on
the
board
front
within
a
few
days.
I'm
thinking
yeah.
So
if
people
could
take
a
look
flag,
if
there's
any
major
issues
comment
and
then
maybe
friday,
we'll
we'll
call
for
the
board
vote.
E
Yeah
yeah
and
then
execution
again
is
pretty
easy
that
we
have
the
linux
foundation
auto
join
for
our
website
for
openjs.
So
that's
very
easy
credit
card
straight.
What
else
the
comms
plan
is
in
development,
so
everything
is,
I
think,
falling
into
place
for
execution.
I
A
All
right,
great,
well
good,
meeting
friends
nice
to
see
you
all
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
next
week-
cheers
bye.