►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Cool
looks
like
we
should
be
live
thanks.
Everyone
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
excuse.
Me
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
today's
the
second
day
of
the
third
month,
yeah
thanks
everybody
for
joining
how
about
we
get
started
with
some
announcements.
B
Oh,
we
have
lots
of
them
today,
so
first
off
tomorrow
is
the
js
trends
panel
that
we're
doing
this
is
going
to
go
out
on
youtube,
like
our
amas
really
excited
about
this.
It's
a
continuation
of
that
panel
that
we've
been
doing
last
couple
years
at
openjs
world
and
alex
williams
and
liz
parity
and
chris
and
nick
nissi
are
all
gonna
just
get
together
and
talk,
and
we
had
sort
of
like
a
preview
chat
yesterday.
B
That
was
super
fun,
so
if
you're
available
to
you
know
tune
in
for
that,
live,
would
love
to
have
you,
but
also
just
be
on
the
lookout
and
help
us
promote
that,
because
it's
going
to
be
super,
it's
it'll
be
a
fun
convo.
So
that's
that's
tomorrow,
at
like
11
or
noon
eastern
suddenly.
C
B
B
Okay,
so
so
the
next
things
are,
the
standards
working
group
is
meeting
next
week
and
we've
got
lots
of
comments
in
so
far
on
our
different
strategic
directions.
We've
talked
to
several
projects.
We
still
want
to
talk
to
more
projects.
So
if
you
are
at
all
interested
in
informing
how
the
standards
working
group
can
impact,
you
know
web
standards
or
also
provide
value
to
your
projects,
please
let
us
know
in
the
hash
standards
channel
and
slack
workspace,
so
we
can
set
up
time
to
talk.
B
We
also
use
freshly
this
morning
have
two
proposals
that
we
want
to
develop
for
further
review.
So,
if
you're
interested
in
getting
involved,
please
please
chime
in
and
let
us
know
it
also
happens
that
next
week
we
conflict
with
the
cpc
working
group
meeting,
which
is
next
tuesday
as
well,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
just
do
a
do:
a
little
switch
up
and
watch
the
issues
for
an
update
on
the
standards
working
group
time
change
so
that
we
can
make
that
happen,
and
then
book
club.
B
That's
another
thing:
that's
happening
we're
going
to
make
a
thing
if
you're
interested
in
talking
about
nadia
eggball's
latest
book
working
in
public,
we're
tentatively
scheduling
that
for
march
24th,
and
so
that's
going
to
go
on
the
public
calendar
or
if
you
just
want
to
share
books
or
papers
or
things
you've
been
reading.
The
book
club
channel
in
slack
is
quite
fun,
we're
having
a
good
time
so
join
us
for
a
book
club
meeting
we'll
talk
about
that.
You
can
have
tea
or
wine
whatever
your
time
zone
and
then
open
js
world.
B
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everybody
who
submitted
we're
in
the
act
of
reviewing
cfps
right
now,
and
thank
you
to
those
who
are
taking
time
to
do
that
and
the
programming
committee
is
meeting
again
on
thursday.
We
meet
every
thursday
and
we'd
love
to
have
you
I'm
just
again.
These
are
events
that
are
on
the
public,
open
js
calendar.
So
you
can
add
that
to
your
calendar
and
get
the
notification
in
your
local
time
and
that's
what
I
have
for
an
outfit.
A
Today,
yeah,
and
not
only
you
know,
we
have
the
meeting
coming
up,
but
also
we're
looking
for
folks
to
help
review
cfps
right.
So
if
anybody
wants
to
help,
please
let
us
know-
and
you
know
the
more
the
merrier
there
for
sure.
A
Cool
anything
board
related.
E
F
Anything,
no
nothing
decided
that
I'm
still
new
to
this,
but
nothing
decided
that
I
that
I
think
is
new
to
this
to
this
group.
A
A
E
On
board
approval
yeah
that
reminds
me,
we
did
have
the
vote
on
that
and
that's
something
we
should
have
brought
that.
So,
yes,
that
that
was
approved.
The
the
question
that
actually
came
up
was
with
or
without
the
comments,
because
there's
some
comments
making
suggestions.
So
the
net
was
the
board
approved
this
with
or
without
the
comments.
E
So
we
should
either
accept
the
two
comments
that
are
there
and
land
or
not
accept
the
two
comments
in
land,
and
I
it
would
be
good
for
us
to
decide
which-
and
then
you
know
if
we
want
to
change
it
after
that,
we
would
potentially
need
to
go
back
for
another
vote.
E
G
Yeah
I
was
trying
to
find
the
issue.
Sorry
yeah,
I
think,
essentially,
what
I'm.
What
I
was
suggesting
was
to
be
more
clear
about
the
fact
that
if
the
project
maintainers
didn't
respond,
the
cpc
could
just
make
a
decision
by
itself
and
then
both
and
you
know
just
simplified.
In
all
cases,
the
it
was
consensus
driven
and
didn't
necessarily
require
two-thirds
of
the
voices
in
one
case
and
the
other,
because
I
just
didn't
really
see
why
one
case
would
need
more
of
a
agreement
than
the
other.
B
I
I
think
I
wanted
to
weigh
in
just
to
share
contextually
that
this
has
occurred
twice
so
far
in
our
foundation's
history,
where
our
project
has
wanted
to
move
into
emeritus.
In
one
case,
the
project
maintainers
were
interested
in
in
moving
on
and
were
either
going
to
transition
the
project
to
emeritus
or
or
if
they
weren't
able
to
find
maintainers.
B
The
project
we
were
able
to
do
that,
and
so
we
transitioned
that
to
new
leadership
and
the
project
is
still
going
strong
as
an
at-large
and
then
the
second
case
is
this
more
recent
case
with
pep,
where
we've
actually,
I
should
say,
I've
actually
been
working
with
patrick
locke
and
some
of
the
folks
on
the
jquery
side
for
several
months.
Preparing
for
these
final
kind
of
things
and
just
didn't
do
a
very
good
job,
surfacing
that
that
was
that
this
was
going
to
happen.
B
A
So
should
we
make
a
decision
on
these
comments
or
I
think
that
would
be
good.
E
Like
if
we
can
agree
and
and
just
land,
because
we
either
have
like
delay,
if
we
don't
agree
with
one
of
the
two
which
is
like
with
or
without
the
comments-
and
I
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
delay
unless
people
are
like,
have
strong
feelings,
kind
of
thing,
one
way
or
the
other.
I.
E
E
E
A
Cool
and
maybe
drop
that
in
the
notes
too,
I
will
move
on.
The
next
issue
is
7
11..
This
is
rename
master
branches.
A
We've
got
a
checklist
here,
so
this
is
an
issue
and
we've
got
a
checklist
here.
That
has
a
few
things
left
over
toby.
You've
got
michael,
did
a
whole
bunch
of
work.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
and
then
there's
a
later
on
checklist.
That's
we've
only
got
a
couple
of
checked.
E
Off
as
well
yeah
I've
I've
been
following
that,
so
I
can
speak
a
little
bit
to
it.
Sandal's
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
in
terms
of
submitting
prs.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
Thank
you,
I'm
I'm.
What
I
wanted
to
request
here
was
sort
of
a
mass
fast
track.
E
E
G
So
I'm
happy
to
do
mass
fast
track
here.
I
just
think
the
question
is
getting
like
the
right
eyeballs
to
check
that
we're
not
making
mistakes,
and
I
also
don't
think
it's
a
common
enough
issue
to
actually
like
add
some
process
to
do
this.
Let's
just
do
it
for
this
time
and
be
done
with
it
exactly.
A
I'm
just
going
to
say
these:
these
are
all
like
a
lot
of
just
you
know,
mastered
ahead
changes,
and
I
I'm
all
for
just
kind
of
moving
forward
on
those.
E
So
maybe
what
I
was
suggesting
is
I
can
open
an
issue
which
is
like
one
issue
which
is
like
fast
track
approval
for
these
set
of
links
and
if
a
few
people
can
just
sort
of
go
through
and
plus
plus
one
that
you
know
we'll
we'll
assume
that,
like
two
or
three
tse
members
or
sorry
cpc
members
doing
that
is
enough
and
then
we
can
go
land
them
all.
That.
A
Makes
sense,
yeah
and
and
the
links
would
be
links
to
the
prs
that
are
making
the
changes
and
the
assumption
would
be
anybody
who
kind
of
gave
the
fast
track.
Approval
also
went
through
and
just
looked
at
them
and,
and
you
know,
kind
of
verified
that
that's
there's
nothing
beyond
those
those
kind
of
search
and
replace
sort
of
things.
A
Okay,
yeah,
you
could
just
make
that
clear
in
the
comments.
I'd
be
happy
to
help
there.
So
if
you
want.
E
E
Sure
yeah
I'll
basically
create
an
issue
copy
that
we've
got
right
now.
Eight
prs
so
I'll
just
copy
the
links
which
are
in
this
issue
in
the
fast
fast
track
request
I'll
ccu
and
cpc
in
general,
and
you
know
hopefully
we'll
get
two
or
three
people
and
then
go
ahead
and
land
them
sounds
good.
That's
good!
Okay,.
A
E
Still
a
couple
like
there's
openjs
user
feedback
that
somebody
needs
to
take
a
look
at
okay
and
test
easy
cla.
So
if
you
look
at
that
list,
there's
two
two
which
are
private,
so
I
think
actually
the
private
ones
are
probably
okay
since
they're,
not
public
anyway,
so
the
the
last
two
public
ones.
I
think
we
really
want
to
look
at.
Are
these
the
cla
and
the
user
feedback?
So
once
we
we
look
at
those
and
have
a
pr,
then
we
can
close
them
out.
Okay,
cool
that
makes.
A
All
right,
great
excellence.
This
issue,
I'm
surprised
to
see,
is
707.
This
is
the
primary
cpc
director
election,
which
is
closed
and
I
closed
it
a
few
minutes
ago.
Thank
you.
A
Improving
diversity
and
inclusion
at
the
openjs
foundation.
We've
kind
of
worked
on
this
in
a
couple
of
working
sessions.
So
if
sarah
or
toby
or
anyone
else
wants
to
give
any
sort
of
you
know
bit
of
an
update,
that
would
be
great.
F
Yeah
either
this
is
great,
I
think
so.
Last
we
met.
We
talked
about
opening
the
survey
past,
just
the
cpc
as
it's
such
a
small
group
that
it
would
be
easy
to
identify
who
we
are.
It's
not
very
anonymous
our
goal,
so
our
next
step
is
next
steps.
I
understand
them.
F
Toby
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
are
to
find
someone
that
could
work
with
us
on
the
data
science
level,
to
make
sure
that
any
that
we're
being
thoughtful
about
survey
data
in
general,
as
well
as
to
have
things
reviewed
by
the
legal
team
when
they
are
ready.
G
F
So
so
now
that
we've,
so
that
may
be
next
steps
we
can
spend
next
week
working
on
it
or
we
can
actually
maybe
take
a
stab
sometime
over
the
next
few
days,
getting
at
least
a
first
version
together,
so
that
we
can
spend
next
week
discussing
it.
I
think
yeah,
that's
as
much
as
I
view
of
next
steps.
G
Yeah,
I
think
that
that
makes
sense.
I
I
frankly
felt
a
bit
overwhelmed
by
the
complexity
of
actually
running
a
survey
like
this
following
our
conversation
last
week.
What's
interesting,
however,
as
I
was
in
the
in
w3c's
equivalent
of
this
discussion
this
afternoon
and
they're,
exactly
look,
you
know
exactly
the
same
place
as
we
are
thinking.
G
It
would
be
really
useful
to
do
a
survey
to
understand
our
membership
better
and
see
you
know,
what's
up
and
who's
doing,
what
and
and
ask
essentially,
is
asking
the
same
questions,
so
it
feels
like
there's
some
interesting
opportunities
in
the
future
to
to
have
discussions
with
them.
They
suggested
joining
our
call
next
week
if
we
were
open
to
that.
G
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
actually
possible,
I
imagine
it
is,
but
I
think
you
know
that
might
be
like
an
interesting
way
forward
to
actually
create
some
assets
that
could
be
and
process
that
could
be
used
by
multiple
organizations,
not
just
ours
and
also
maybe
share
the
workload
a
bit
more
yeah.
D
I
think
that's
fantastic
that
they
join.
We
did
jerry,
and
I
talked
to
our
legal
counsel
about
that.
We
do
have
gdpr
data
retention
issues
to
consider
best
practices
on
right,
anonymization,
aggregation
and
then
how
do
you
dump
that
data?
How
do
you
handle
it
and
we
actually
will
be
doing
have
more
resources
inside
the
linux
foundation
on
research,
they're,
initially
recommending
our
legal
counsel
that
we
look
at
a
third
party?
Who
does
that
who
can
handle
it
safely?
D
So
lots
of
things
to
consider
but
yeah?
I
think
we
should
probably
reconvene
next
week.
I
don't
know
if
you
would
have
an
urgency
to
create
that
testing
tool
just
yet
until
we
solve
the
data
privacy
issue.
D
G
Maybe,
as
next
steps
just
have
a
conversation
next
week
again
sounds
good
wonderful,
great,
and
thank
you
for
checking
into
all
of
that.
That's
great
it's
great
to.
G
D
F
If
I
could
repeat
that,
so
if
I
could
repeat
that
back
to
you,
so
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
think,
being
thoughtful
about
this
stuff
is
great.
Would
you
say
probably
the
in
the
meantime,
do
you
think
our
best
next
course
of
action
is.
I
know
you
put
together
a
list
of
resources
that
are
super
valuable.
I
can
imagine
that
those
resources
might
be
helpful
to
share
if
people
were
looking
for
help
in
their
particular
project.
F
I
suppose
a
question
for
people
in
this
group
who
are
involved
in
projects
is,
is
this
something
people
are
looking
for?
Is
this
something
that
would
be
received?
Well,
is
this
something
that
it
seems
like
people
are
interested
in?
You
know
we've
been
focusing
on
maybe
proving
a
need
to
people
before
providing
them
with
the
resources.
I
wonder
if
we,
if
it
makes
sense
to
skip
that
part
or
you
know,
while
we're
learning
about
it
in
the
meantime,
provide
resources.
F
I'm
just
wondering
if
it
would,
if
that
would
make
sense.
Yes,
if,
if
we
feel
like
the
survey
data,
if
we
feel
like
these
things
need
to
happen
in
a
specific
order
or
if,
with
the
survey
data
once
we
have
the
cert,
you
know
like
if
the
survey
data
will
influence
the
resources
that
we
share
or
if
you
know
we
can
identify
the
pro
if
we
can
identify
if
there
is
a
problem
kind
of
async.
That's
if
that's
beneficial.
E
Right,
okay,
I
just
want
to
clarify,
like
the
thought
I
had
since
the
last
meeting.
Was
that
the
I
don't
think
we
need
data
to
agree
that
there's
something
we
should
address
right
like
I
think
everybody's
you
know
we're
not
we're
not
trying
to
figure
out
if
there's
something
to
address
or
not
the
the
value
of
the
data,
in
my
mind
at
least,
is
being
able
to
show
going
forward
that
what
we've
done
has
actually
made
a
difference.
E
E
So
I
think
that's
a
long
way
of
saying
you
know.
I
agree
with
the
idea
of
just
moving
forward
without
blocking
anything
on
that.
G
Like
to
point
out
that
the
other
part
of
the
conversation
that
we
had
at
w3c
today
was
precisely
about
this
question
right,
so
how
what
do
we
share?
Why
is
it
useful
to
a
constituency?
Do
we
do
they
care
about
it?
How
can
they
help?
How
much
do
we
share?
Do
we
do
that
now
et
cetera?
So
I
think
you
know
that
really
brings
me
to
think
that
a
conversation
if
we
can
bring
some
of
w3c's
people
over
it
would
be
great
to
so
try
to
solve
these.
G
And
to
be
clear,
one
of
the
questions
that
was
brought
up
is
how
much
do
we
share
like?
How
much
is
it
good
to
share?
Is
it
good
to
share
like
a
lot
of
information
at
the
risk
of
sort
of,
like
overwhelming
people
was
like
things
that
they're
supposed
to
do?
Do
you
just
chill,
like
you
know,
tiny
amounts
to
really
help
sort
of
like
guide
people
through,
like
you
know,
succeeding
steps
like
how
do
you
do
that?
That
was
also
questions
that
were
asked
today.
E
The
simpler
the
better,
in
my
mind,
is,
I
know,
I
know
if
you're
faced
with
like
hey,
go,
read
this
hundred
things
and
get
on
top
of
the
whole
issue.
That's
a
much
bigger
ass.
Then
here
are
three
things
you
can
do
to
help
right.
F
G
There's
a
symbolic
dimension
to
having
an
organization
like
ours.
Actually,
you
know
publicly
put
out
resources,
though,
both
in
terms
of
what
that
says,
and
also
in
terms
of
like
vetting
some
resources
at
the
expense
of
others.
That's
also
something
to
consider.
F
D
No,
I
think
we
would
be
a
great
sort
of
real
world
use
case.
I
do
encourage
you
all
to
read
their
content
because
they
have
some
pretty
good
documentation.
It's
pretty
concise,
so
we're
not
starting
at
zero,
but
yeah,
I'm
sure
they
would
partner
with
us
so
I'll,
invite
him
or
one
of
his
folks
to
our
next
planning
session.
F
That
sounds
amazing.
That
would
be
really
helpful.
I
think,
as
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
all
of
us,
but
I've
definitely
heard
from
everyone
individually
that
we're
a
little
bit
out
of
our
depth,
but
really
well
intentioned.
G
Yeah
yeah
this
I'm
glad
we're
having
like
a
frank
discussion
about
this
topic
today,
because
I
I
felt,
like
you
know
the
same
concern.
B
I
did
so
this
is
adjacent
to
this
conversation,
but
and
there's
a
community
on
the
sustain,
oss
discord.
That's
been
meeting
around,
you
know,
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion,
and
you
know
the
topic.
Du
jour
and
one
of
the
things
that
they're
kind
of
trying
to
build
out
which
is
related
to
what
we've
been
discussing,
is
sort
of
like
a
checklist
of
things
that
projects
can
do
and
to
signal
that
they
are.
B
And
so
this
is
just
a
hack
indeed
with
some
of
that
initial
kids
thing
so
to
speak,
and
so,
if
you
were
interested
in
helping
to
fill
that
out,
I'm
sure
that
this
could
possibly
be
useful
but
again
adjacent
to
what
we're
doing
not
this
of
the.
B
A
Cool
if
anybody
could
drop,
maybe
just
a
couple
of
bullet
points
into
the
dock,
for
this
issue
that
might
be
helpful
and
otherwise.
Well,
we'll
we'll
we'll
talk
about
next
week's
working
session
in
a
few
minutes
once
we
get
through
our
agenda
so
in
the
interim
I'll
I'll
move
on.
Unless
we
want
to
talk
about
this
any
further.
A
Cool
great,
so
moving
on.
The
next
item
is
google
summer
of
code
2021,
the
the
deadline
is
passed,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
should
just
close
this
issue.
A
Does
anybody
have
any
objection
to
that?
I'm
not
sure
you
know
brian's,
not
here,
I'm
not
sure.
If
we've
had
any
interest,
so
I
will
close
it
yeah,
I
would
say
just
close
it.
Cool
next
up
is
the
provide
implementation
guides
for
dco
and
cla
toby.
Would
I
would
I
refer
to
you
on
this
or
is
brian
working
on
this
yeah.
G
No,
like
I,
I
did
my
point
like
we're
just
waiting
on
brian
to
do
it's
been
so
long.
I
I
don't
remember
what
it
is
but,
like
I
know
like
I,
I
don't
have
anything
to
do
with
it
anymore,
yeah
yeah.
I
I-
and
I
don't
mean
this
by
the
way,
just
to
be
clear
to
like
this
on
on
brian,
not
having
done
the
thing
like,
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
reasons
why
it's
like
it's
been
taking
time.
I
just
I
it's.
G
I
don't
remember
what
it
is
about
anymore,
like
he
had
to
do
something,
and
I
don't
know
what
it
is.
B
So
just
there
was
an
upstream
pr
series
of
pr's
that
he
was
making
into
the
pro
bot
dco
bot,
which
is
a
fun
thing
to
say,
probably
and
those
were
being
reviewed
and
incorporated
so
that
we
could
then
have
a
dco
brought
tool
that
we
recommended
out.
That
was
the
that
was
the
thing
that
we
were
blocked
on.
Do.
A
Oh
great
and
and
and
you
know
recently
or
or
yeah-
yeah,
okay,
great,
so
it's
it's
still
a
hot
potato,
maybe
jory
or
someone
could
just
pop
a
little
note
in
this
issue.
That
would
be
great,
even
though
I
know
you
know,
brian
has
more
context.
Something
might
be
helpful,
cool
and
then
last
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
sun
setting
checklist
moving
over
to
the
project
status,
repository
and
cleaning
up
some
templates.
A
We've
got
some
approvals
here
and
it's
met
the
time
limit,
so
it
could
land,
but
folks
want
to
take
a
look
at
it.
They're
welcome
too.
G
E
A
We
maybe
jory
remembered
the
half
thing
that
she
was
gonna
mention,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
next
week's
working
session,
which
is
perhaps
related.
B
Yes,
so
I
we
did
want
to
report
that
we
had
one
issue
from
a
code
of
conduct:
issue
surfaced
from
a
project
that
was
delegated
to
the
reports
group
and
we're
taking
a
moderation
action
for
on
behalf
of
the
grunt
project,
and
but
we
also
agreed
in
our
conversation.
That
is
part
of
our
like
transparency
process,
that
we
should
probably
start
reporting
to
the
cpc
when
these
groups
meet
and
take
an
action
so
just
transparently
reporting
that
that's
that's
happened
or
happening.
A
Great,
thank
you
I
so
it
seems
like
there's
dni
work
that
we
could
do
for
next
week
and
I
there
was
mention
of
maybe
working
on
moderation
in
some
working
session,
but
maybe
we
just
saved
that
for
a
future
working
session.
A
The
the
the
coc
report
recently
and
just
kind
of
you
know
making
sure
that
our
processes
in
place
and
that
we
handle
things
properly
and
that
we
we
have
you
know,
maybe
even
document
some
more
about
reporting
to
the
cpc
and
whatnot
just
kind
of
making
sure
that
we're
doing
our
due
diligence
and
we
kind
of
did
some
work.
And
then
we
let
it
sit.
And
then
now
something
happened.
And
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
things
right
and
that
that
were
things
are
properly
documented
and
such.
F
That's
great,
I'm
actually
yeah.
That's
that's
great
that
we're
thinking
about
it.
I
don't
know
if
I
miss
a
meeting
or
if
this
is
another
context,
I'm
not
aware
of
that
situation,
but
I
I
think
that
seems
if,
if,
if
the
focus
is
dna
support-
and
that
seems
like
I
don't
want
toby
I'd
love
to
hear
your
thoughts
and
I
don't
mean
to
hijack,
but
if
focus
is
dni
support
the
that
seems
like
a
really
good
nut
to
crack
as
well.
E
D
D
A
I
don't
know
how
to
say
this,
but
I
think
if,
if
like
so,
for
example,
sarah,
if
you
have
an
interest
in
this
sort
of
work,
I
I
know
you
know
if
you
wanted
to
be
on
that
email
list
and
a
part
of
the
group
that
responds
to
these
sorts
of
things
or
anyone
on
the
call.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
you
know,
just
let
us
know
and
we'll
include
you.
F
Yeah,
please
I
do
that
it's
kind
of
my
job
my
day
job,
so
that
sounds
great
great.
G
If
the
questions
here
that
you
asked
earlier
was,
should
we
work
on
this
next
week
because
there's
an
emergency
instead
of
on
something
else,
and
also
these
two
things
are
related
I.e.
A
broken
code
of
conduct
is
not
really
conducive
to
an
inclusive
environment.
I
think
that's
a
very
good
point
right
and
I
I
don't
think
I
mean
it.
G
You
know
it's
probably
actually
more
effective
to
organize
the
calls
that
we
want
to
do
with
george
from
chaos
and
in
the
w3c
and
like
it
was
a
longer
time
span
in
a
week
anyway.
A
B
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
clarify
and
our
our
process
actually
has
worked
really
well,
it's
just.
It's
highlighted
some
gaps
that
we
want
to
fill
so
we're
the
the
group
and
the
reporter
are
very
pleased
with
our
sla
on
this
so
far,
so
this
has
actually
been
good,
but
it's
highlighted
some
things
that
we
can
improve
on
and
I
just
want
to
and
just
say
that
out
loud
there's.
No,
this
was
not
a
broken
process.
This
time.
D
A
E
A
Yeah
and
it
seemed
to
me
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
with
with
the
other
initiative,
it
wouldn't
be
bad
to
wait
a
week.
You
know,
like
toby,
said,
plan
to
meet
with
somebody.
Some
folks
and-
and
you
know,
come
regrouped.
G
Yeah-
and
you
know
as
it
was,
I
think
it's
important
to
like
this
is
actually
something
that
has
concrete
impact
on
how
people
feel
in
the
community.
A
And
I
think
immediately
kind
of
you
know,
for
lack
of
a
better
term
retrospecting
and
and
taking
it
very
seriously,
also
is
good
great.
So
then
the
plan
will
be
to
work
on
that
next
week
and
tentatively
plan
for
more
dni
work.
The
following
working
session.
A
And
to
be
clear,
the
working
sessions
now
are
in
the
calendar,
the
openjs
calendar
and
it's
essentially,
the
working
session
is
always
at
the
same
time
in
the
following
week
of
the
most
recent
meeting.
So
like
this
time
next
week,
and
then
you
know
when
we
do
the
earlier
meeting
the
immediately
following
working
session
is
at
that
same
time.
A
If
that
makes
sense,
I
feel
like
I
make
it
more
confusing
when
I
actually
say
it
out
loud,
but
that's
part
of
the
reason
why
I
put
in
the
calendar
so
and
then
I
think,
if
we
get
to
a
point
where
we
don't
have
anything
for
next
week's
working
session,
I
would
just
go
and
delete
that
calendar.
Invite
so
that
it's
not
on
people's
calendar.
A
Cool,
maybe
jory
you
and
I
can
offline
async.
Just
you
know
some
sort
of
agenda
for
next
week
and
we
can
go
from
there
great.
Is
there
anything
else
that
we
want
to
or
need
to
talk.
A
Good
yeah
yeah
this
was
my
son's
like
hangout
playroom
and
then
I
we
switched
and
so
now
I
have
it,
but
I
do
like
the
blue
wall.
It
confuses
my
camera
a
lot.
I
always
have
to
go
in
and
adjust
its
settings
to
like
try
and
make
me
not
be
like
really
bright
red,
but
but
yeah.
It
is
a
nice
wall.
I
like
it.
G
It's
great,
I
like
it
too,.
B
Here's
a
topic
of
business
jordan
just
reminded
me
that
next
week
is
the
tc39
meeting,
and
so,
if
you
would
like
to
you,
know,
weigh
in
on
anything,
go
feel
free
to
harass
your
local
tc39
rep
on
their
proposals.
You
care
about
just
kidding.
Obviously,
that's
a
joke,
but
but
it's
worth
going
and
taking
a
look
at
the
at
the
agenda
for
those
interested
and-
and
you
know.
H
The
deadline
for
adding
things
for
advancement
was
last
saturday
morning,
so,
theoretically,
all
the
important
stuff.
That's
there
it's
going
to
be
theirs
on
there.
E
B
A
great
question
I
mean
they,
we
do
in
the
standards
working
group
sort
of
discuss
if
there's
something
that
seems
particularly,
but
one
of
the
things
that
that
we're
trying
to
kind
of
systematize
is
how
to
make
that
more
useful,
like
a
more
useful
potential
broadcast
out
to
projects
like
here's,
a
proposal-
that's
interesting,
maybe
to
you
and
how
it
will
impact,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
A
Well,
the
next
one
is
conflicts
with
the
working
session,
so.
B
And
the
and
the
meeting
itself,
so
it
looks
like
probably
the
simplest
thing
will
be
for
us
to
postpone
our
standards
working
group
meeting
that
I
was
so
excited
about
earlier
on
the
call.
B
D
A
I'm
reminded
in
slack
the
node.js
social
team,
which
is
just
tierney
and
me,
has
a
a
group
handle.
You
know
you
can
do
at
node.js
social
team
and
he
and
I
will
both
get
alerted.
A
A
F
A
I
also
got
a
motorcycle
recently.
You
know
what
else
can
we
talk.