►
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
C
A
D
I
guess
so
not
this
Friday,
but
the
following
Friday
is
the
board
meeting.
So
if
anybody
has
anything
that
they
think
should
be
brought
up,
make
sure
it's
on
the
board.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
things:
the
travel
fund
and
the
update
to
the
project
progression
that
you
know
I've
sent
out
to
get
the
okay's
or
at
least
no
objections
from
the
board,
as
appropriate.
A
A
D
A
A
A
No
okay,
great
and
I'll
just
mention
again
we're
going
to
cut
the
meeting
a
little
bit
short
for
private
session,
probably
about
15
minutes.
Really.
We
don't
have
a
very
heavy
agenda
here,
so
that
should
be
malicious
progress.
So
the
first
issue.
The
first
item
in
our
agenda
is
issue
331.
This
is
administrating
administering
project
applications.
A
D
D
C
C
E
E
Like
I,
you
know,
I
didn't
know
who
my
champion
was
for
like
what
quite
a
while
I
know
the
changes
you
know
through
like
again
back
channels
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
the
way
it
should
work.
I,
don't
think
it's
a
great
process.
I
mean
it
worked.
Fine
for
us,
because
I
was
lucky
to
be
in
the
position
with
any
project
that
you
know
wouldn't
have.
The
networking
relationship
I
had
would
have
been
really
in
the
door
at
this.
So.
E
Know
so
I'm
actually
like
I've,
been
traveling
quite
a
bit
and
I'm
not
really
at
today,
which
what
is
what
and
I'm
kind
of
happy
was.
You
know
any
kind
of
process,
and
you
said
that
you're,
the
most
most
comfortable
was
in
me.
Helping
out
afternoons
to
try
to
you
know,
use
the
experiences
like
amp
joining
to
help
make
the
whole
process
better.
So,
whichever
one
you're
more
comfortable
was
I'm
happiest
and
not
have
more
time
from
next
week
onwards.
D
I
think
landing
321
and
that
a
PR
to
add
in
some
more
bits-
and
maybe
you
know
Toby-
is
an
ideal
person
to
kind
of
go
through
and
say:
okay,
which
pieces
you
know,
I,
don't
think
we
have
anything
in
there.
That
says
we
say
there's
a
champion,
but
we
don't
say:
when
does
the
champion
contact
the
project?
D
E
Something
like
that
would
be
ideal,
I
mean
just
having
a
process
for
it.
Where
you
know
it's
clear
for
everyone,
including
you
know,
CPC
members,
what
the
next
steps
are,
so
that
there
is
no,
you
know,
sort
of
like
weird
time
where,
like
no
one
really
knows
what's
going
on
on
the
outside,
I
mean
I'm
sure
that
you
know
what's
going
on
okay,
but
on
the
outside,
it's
like
completely
opaque
and
it's
well.
D
I'm
not
even
gonna,
like
I,
mean
the
question
I
got
is
I
got
was
from
one
of
our
champions
for
a
later.
Application
was
like
well
when
should
I
reach
out
to
them,
so
it's
it's
I,
think
both
for
both
external
and
internal
it'd,
be
good
to
add.
Continue
to
add
to
that
that
progression
document
to
make
it
clear
right.
E
And
the
other
aspect
to
that
is
from
the
outside.
If
you
actually
know
that
these
steps
are
happening,
it's
you
know
it's
soothing
right.
You
know
that
that's
what's
gonna
happen
next
and
you're
sort
of
waiting
for
that,
and
it's
also
something
you
can
ask
about.
You
know
you
can
just
reach
out
and
say:
is
there
a
champion
who
is
it
right
like
if
you
don't
know
what
the
next
steps
are
at
all,
it's
really
hard
to
even
ask
those
questions.
Yeah
yeah.
D
A
Yeah
so
I
yeah
I
think
that
would
be
good.
You
know
either
Toby
once
you
get
done,
traveling
and
stuff.
If
you
could
kind
of
review
your
experience
against
the
documentation
and
just
take
some
notes,
and
one
of
us
can
either
go
over
it
with
you
or
you
know,
figure
out
the
best
way
to
integrate
that
and
then
you
know,
I
suggest
we
talk
with
the
current
applicants
about
how
their
process
is
going
and
capture
their.
If
we
I
can
iterate
on
this.
A
D
F
A
That's
a
ticket
great
and
thanks.
Whoever
is
helping
work
on
notes.
We
may
want
to
just
clarify
who's
talking
different
instances,
but
I
appreciate
notes
been
kickin
in
general.
Folks
can
help
out
with
that
might
be
great
great.
So
moving
on
the
next
issue
is
move
COC
proposal
to
stage
two
I
am
not
mistaken.
It's
opening
here.
This
is
one
of
the
ones
that
we
are
taking
to
the
board
or
has
been
no.
A
A
D
A
A
There's
there's
some
reference
from
the
security
working
group
we
could
go,
but
if
I'm
not
mistaken
well
so
I
know
Brian
opened
a
PR
and
I
closed
it
this
morning
about
adding,
like
help
section
to
our
repo
around
like
how
you
might
get
in
touch
with
people,
what
what
did
we?
Where
did
we
land
in
terms
of
this
particular
issue,
though,
and
how
far
we
want
to
go
with
responsible
security?
This
for
fools
I
think.
D
In
this
one
we
were
wondering
if
the
security
working
group
could
help
write
a
draft,
and
it
sounds
like
MRSA
has
volunteered
to
do
that.
Okay,
so
I
think
we
should
wait
till
we
see
what
that
looks
like,
and
then
you
know.
Ideally
it's
something
we
can
just
say
like
here's,
our
guidance
for
what
projects
within
the
open
J's
foundation
should
do
you
know
if
it's
if
it
just
turns
out
to
be
that
we
look
at
and
say
well,
you
know,
maybe
it's
good
advice,
but
not
something.
We
want
to
rent
Rebekah
men
to
strongly.
D
We
can
decide
what
to
do,
but
having
something
concrete
that
we
can
read
through
I.
Think
is
a
good
good
thing
to
wait
for
and
then
we
can
say:
yeah.
Okay,
that's
just
good
practice.
Therefore
we
should
ask
that
everybody
does
that
or
this
is
a
recommendation
or
whatever
sort
of
strength
in
terms
of
suggesting
that
it
be
followed
or
not.
A
D
A
All
right
so
moving
on,
so
those
are
all
the
agenda
items
in
particular
they're.
The
next
on
the
list
is
the
the
you
know
going
through
the
post,
bootstrap
board
and
I
think
it
might
make
sense
to
go
through
all
the
boards
that
we
have
open,
24
minutes
in
so
we've
got
some
time
here.
The
post,
bootstrapped
housekeeping
board
is
project.
Three
I'll
drop
a
link
in
the
chat
we
want
it.
A
A
The
next
item
in
the
tabular
column
is
defined
and
documented
style
guide.
For
the
foundation
mean
this
has
been
open
for
a
while.
Okay,
so
last
week
progress
the
comment
as
progress
has
been
happening
at
the
board.
Nearing
the
finish
line.
Is
this
I
assume
nothing's
happened
on
this,
but
is
this
on
the
board.
B
It
is
we
had
one
or
two
minor
changes
to
the
documents
to
the
various
legal
documents
of
the
board's,
approving
and
ask
them
to
get
back
to
me
middle
this
week.
If
there
are
any
further
changes-
or
you
know,
requests
for
time
to
review
these
things,
if
not
the
votes
going
to
get
started,
that
is
the
gating
factor
here.
A
A
A
D
Yeah
I
think
waiting
on
the
Blake.
There
are
two
separate
things
in
one
case
where
there
is
board
approval
required
like
if
it's
something
that
the
Charter
requires
them
to
approve,
but
then
separately
they're.
Just
you
know
like
we're,
waiting
for
legal
advice
or
whatever
so
and
I
think
it's
worth
making
that
distinction
or.
B
C
Two
labels,
you
know,
because
what
on
the
project
directed
funding
piece,
we
really
are
looking
for
from
the
board
is
just
more
of
a
guidance
on
like
strategy
and
how
to
go
about
having
this
conversation
based
on.
You
know
their
needs
and
concerns.
So
that's
my
two
cents.
We
don't
even
have
a
proposal
for
anything
here,
because
what
we're
looking
for
is
more,
you
know
strategic
conversation
to
be
had.
A
A
C
Yeah
so
I
was
gonna,
say
I
think
there's
those
tickets
that
need
to
be
created
for
our
new
incubating
projects
and
I'd
also
like
to
just
consider
going
ahead
and
putting
tickets
for
all
of
our
projects.
Now
that
we
have
like
like,
where
does
the
list
live
and,
like
the
you
know,
template
issue
template
questions
figure
it
out,
because
some
of
our
current
projects
are
we've
got
in
progress
and
then
a
lot
of
them
have
been
on
standby
kind
of
questions
and
I'd
love
to
have
a
good.
Every
project
in
here
right
now
agreed.
D
C
C
D
C
D
C
D
A
A
E
E
Just
quickly
again
thank
everyone
in
the
CPC
for
meeting
the
deadline
to
actually
ship
announced
being
the
event
the
end,
the
announcement.
Sorry
for
him
on
time.
Like
you,
don't
know
how
thankful
I
am
for
all
the
work
that
you
did
so
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
well
through
voice.
So
thanks
a
lot.
A
E
A
E
C
E
A
E
F
Guess
the
two
things
that
I
would
say
is
like
I
do
not
believe
like
when
we
drafted
the
Charter
and
we
drafted
regular
members.
The
membership
requirements
I
have
to
double
check
if
that's
in
the
Charter
or
if
it's
in
the
governance,
but
it
was
specifically
being
active
in
a
foundation
project
for
three
months.
I
think
was
the
requirement
that
we
had
on
the
governance
for
regular
members
correct.
We
can
change
the
governance
without
requiring
board
approval.
So
really
you
know
if
we
want
to
allow.
F
D
I
think
it
is
in
the
Charter
to
be
honest,
but
I
would
agree.
It's
like
just
come
and
participate
because
we've
allowed
for
that,
as
as
a
observer
and
then
separately,
I
think
we
need
to
decide.
You
know
that
it
is
whether
you
know
an
incubate
at
what
stage
like,
as
is
incubating,
was
added
after
the
beginning.
To
is
that
a
stage
where
yeah
regular
members
can
nominate
in
and
if
so
then,
it
may
not
even
require
a
change
to
the
Charter
right.
So.
F
Looking
at
the
Charter
right
now,
anyone
who's
been
a
member
of
one
of
the
projects
under
the
OpenGL
foundation
for
at
least
three
months
may
request
to
become
a
regular
member.
So
we
have
a
couple
options
that
we
could
do
here
like
one
that
we
could
do
is
actually
like.
Remove
that
text
from
the
Charter
altogether
about
the
qualifications
of
a
regular
member,
remove
that
governance
that
would
just
require
sign-off
from
the
board
about
moving
where
that
language
lives.
F
D
F
D
The
like,
until
you,
are
not
large
a
growth
or
impact
this,
you
know
there
hasn't
been
that
actual
vote,
so
I
could
see
the
concern
more
being
that
until
that
happens,
you
know
you
you're,
not
it.
The
project
is
not
necessarily
part
of
the
open,
J's
Foundation.
Depending
on
how
you
you,
you
read
the
wording
right
and.
F
Building
on
that,
like
the
application
pipeline,
emails
go
to
all
regular
members,
so
is
it
appropriate
to
have
representatives
from
projects
that
are
not
yet
in
the
foundation
on
those
email
chains?
I.
Think
it's
like
a
high-level
question
that
we
need
to
answer
I.
Think
independent
yeah,
like
you're,
invited
to
all
these
meetings.
You're
invited
to
participate
wholly
like
as
I
said,
I
think
literally,
the
only
difference
between
showing
up
and
participating
and
being
a
regular
member
right
now
is
being
on
one
or
two
email
lists
that
are
primarily
about
like
private
foundation
business.
E
G
D
A
G
Right
and
also
like
I,
think,
there's
a
question
there
of
like.
If
you're
going
down
the
path
of
blocking
regular
membership
for
projects
and
also
is
there
some
kind
of
time
frame
on
norming
membership.
And
if
a
project
can
have
voting
members,
they
should
also
be
able
to
have
regular
members
right.
D
Like
I,
don't
think
they're
like
so,
for
example,
until
you
become
one
of
the
impact
or
at
large
or
whatever
projects
I
don't
think
liking,
and
this
is
because
I
think
we
added
incubating.
But
at
least
my
take
would
have
been
like
until
you
you
get
out
of
incubating.
You.
Don't
have
you're,
not
part
of
the
electing
the
voting
members
either.
D
G
A
Alright,
great
so
we'll
call
it
a
wrap,
then
I
will
stop
streaming
private
thanks.
Everyone
on
the
screen,
Cheers.