►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Cool
all
right,
great
thanks.
Everyone
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
the
23rd
of
november
I'll.
Remind
folks
to
you
know,
make
sure
you're
on
the
list
here
in
the
dock.
If
anybody
can
help
take
notes.
Great,
let
me
add
the
link
to
the
recording
here
before
I
forget
and
we'll
get
started
any
announcements
before
we
get
on
to
the
agenda.
B
I
feel,
like
I
say
this
every
week,
but
our
sponsorship
prospectus
for
openjs
world
in
june
is
almost
done.
They
were
just
making
a
few
edits
so
we'll
have
that
available
on
our
website.
I'll
be
emailing,
many
of
you
as
well.
So
that's
exciting.
It's
all
getting
real
and
the
program
committee
is
working
hard
and
kind
of
fine-tuning.
Some
keynote
speakers
and
we'll
have
cfps
going
out
early
to
mid-january.
A
No
okay
cool,
I
can't
think
of
anything
either.
I
will
jump
into
the
agenda.
There's
nothing
from
the
board
right.
A
Nothing
comes
to
mind
on
my
front,
my
front:
okay,
cool,
so
we've
got
a
short
agenda
here.
I
already
see
some
notes
in
here.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
toby,
so,
for
example,
the
first
one
here
is
the
start,
listing
documents
maintained
by
the
cpc
issue
or
pull
request.
789
no
updates
on
this-
and
I
was
just
looking
at
our
list
of
documents
today
and
thought.
You
know
that
list
of
documents
probably
would
be
a
good
thing.
A
Yeah
looks
like
we've
got
the
next
issue:
786
clarify
requirements
around
coc
violation,
also
already
listed
as
no
update.
C
B
Yeah
and
the
like,
the
follow-up
from
our
last
meeting
was,
I
did
an
inventory
of
all
of
our
projects
and
their
code
of
conducts.
Some
of
them
just
need
to
be
updated.
Some
have
some
old
js
foundation
language,
so
we're
going
to
work
on
some
template
language
like
footer
for
folks
to
make
it
easy.
B
D
B
D
So
we'll
need
to
you
know,
put
together
the
list.
The
proposed
list
agree
that
we
think
you
know
projects
will
find
that
reasonable
and
then
you
know,
decide
yeah,
okay,
we're
going
to
actually
impose
these
and
then
actually
like
audit
them.
The
kind
of
thing
robin's
doing
now
is
to
make
sure
that
we
we
make
sure
that
if
there
are
requirements
that
we
actually
fulfill
them
right.
B
Only
5
out
of
38
didn't
have
one
posted.
Some
were
hard
to
find
and
some
just
linked
to
here's
the
code
of
conduct
but
no
process,
and
I
think
we
all
agreed
without
a
process
yeah.
It's
very
then
we
don't
really
have
one
so
yeah.
A
And-
and
the
last
comment
on
this
issue
that
that
toby
made
has
next
steps
here,
so
that's
a
good
checklist
for
us
to
run
through
to
make
sure
we've
got
this
issue
covered
cool
all
right
next
on
the
agenda
here.
If
we're
moving
on
is
the
create
proposals
for
the
community
fund.
A
You
know,
I
know
we've
kind
of
brainstormed
a
little
bit
on
this
and
you
know
the
the
scholarship
stuff
kind
of
came
out
of
that.
D
I
think
what
we
about
the
last
time
was
the
thank
you
program
and
I
think
robin
had
shared
a
little
bit
of
you
know
what
she'd
researched
so
far,
but
I
I
unfortunately
can't
remember
what
you
were.
Gonna
go
research
some
more,
but
I
think
that
was
what
I
remember
is
you're
going
to
go.
Look
at
some
of
the
other
options
like
the
gift
cards
or
or.
E
I
I
wonder
if
actually
you
know
at
this
point,
because
I
think
one
thing
that's
challenging
about
this
particular
issue:
is
it's
fairly
fairly
vague,
like
it's
opened
with,
you
know
we
have,
we
have
a
fund,
you
know
how
do
we
want
to
use
it?
We
then
kind
of
over
the
course
of
the
summer
and
fall
got
to
a
point
where
we
said.
Okay,
like
we
want
to
focus
on
these
specific
types
of
efforts,
so
the
travel.
E
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
maybe
this
issue
itself
is
has
been
sufficiently
addressed
and
that
we
have
identified
what
the
buckets
are,
but
what
we
need
now
is
more
documentation
and
specificity
around,
like
those
buckets
so
for
the
travel
piece
of
it.
Well,
we're
that
we're
set
effectively
for
the
thank
you
program.
You
know
we're
still
doing
some
research.
B
So
I
think
we
yeah,
I
think
we
need
a
little
working
session
on
a
couple
of
things:
the
travel
fund,
I've
realized
I've
been
working
with
the
lf
on
the
diversity
travel
fund
for
our
event,
and
there
was
a
process
that
was
used
for
montreal.
That
was
before
my
time.
B
There
is
a
process
that
lf
uses
and
then
there's
the
travel
fund
process
for
cpc,
which
actually,
I
don't
think
was
quite
used
directly
for
the
montreal
event.
So
I
think
we
just
had
some
housekeeping
and
clarification.
We
need
to
do
on
how
that's
executed.
B
A
B
But
there
were,
but
people
submitted
a
google
form
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
a
pull
request,
as
outlined
in
our
documentation.
F
D
F
Yeah,
I
think
at
that
time,
michael,
we,
we
had
already
kind
of
moved
it
over
to
the
foundation,
and
that
was
a
temporary
stop
gap
that
was
put
in
place.
We
it
like
I
in
the
in
the
pr
that
I
did
that
did,
link
checking,
I
removed
some
dead
content
that,
like
pointed
to
that
kind
of
stuff
yeah,
I
think
that
that,
for
that
situation
this
also
is
kind
of
irrelevant.
Like
that
situation,
it
yeah,
we
did
it
through
a
form.
I
think.
D
F
D
As
opposed
to,
like,
I
think,
you're
mentioning
like
a
diversity
support
which
might
be
even
a
different
thing,
like
an
additional
different
thing
right.
B
A
It
seems
to
me
like
these,
maybe
are
different
things
right.
Our
travel
fund
has
typically
been.
You
know,
folks
who
are
doing
the
work,
and
we
want
to
support
them
to
to.
You
know,
go
to
these
events
or
whatnot,
whereas
a
diversity
initiative
might
be
different.
Maybe
I'm
wrong.
D
D
A
Yeah,
so
I
I'll
just
add,
you
know
I'll
share
this
link.
This
is
the
travel
fun
doc,
but
like
one
of
the
first
things
that
says,
those
candidates
must
be
an
active
participant
of
one
of
the
projects
of
the
open,
js
foundation
and
such
so
it's
not
maybe
just
an
open.
You
know
right.
E
Right,
but
I
think
I
think,
maybe
one
of
the
things
that
we
had
been
assuming
when
we
when
we
made
that
kind
of
shift
in
renaming
was
to
say
okay,
we
will
then
just
consider
travel
and
and
sort
of
the
travel
fund
procedure
and
process
like
one
way
a
community
member
will
you
know
so
so
I
think
it
was
sort
of
a
you
know,
sub
an
assumption
I
think
on
on
our
part
or
a
lot
of
people's
part
to
just
say:
okay,
when
it
comes
to
a
travel
request,
the
former
rules
that
applied
to
the
travel
fund
apply
when
you're,
making
a
travel
fund
request
to
the
community
yeah.
E
Yeah
so
but
but
I
mean
I
mean
so
so
anyway,
kind
of
go
back
to
my
like
meta
point,
I
I
think
it'd
be
great
to
maybe
close
the
issue
that
we
currently
have
and
instead
open
specific
issues
for
the
buckets
of
proposal
spend
for
the
travel
fund.
Clarification
for
the
thank
you
program,
and
you
know
that
sort
of
things
that
we're
documenting
those
paths
too.
A
D
B
We
had
actually
talked
somebody
else
had
submitted
an
application
once
and
I
think
we
had
discussed
some
guideline
guidelines
and
it
wasn't
completely
formalized
yet
like
you
need
to
be
an
active
participant,
it
needs
to
be
something
that
your
company
wouldn't
pay
for.
B
D
A
And
I
think
it's
interesting
to
to
figure
out.
You
know
some
sort
of
diversity
fun
for
travel,
that
just
wasn't
what
this
one
was
for
all
right,
cool
great,
where
the
heck
am
I
so
moving
on,
or
do
we
need
to
review
the
steps?
For
I
mean
I
guess
there
are
some
notes
here
in
the
in
the
meeting
minutes,
but
we
know
what
to
do
with
this
issue
and
next
steps
and
stuff.
E
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
so
I
think
we
want
to
have
one
of
our
next
working
meetings
be
focused
on
this
particular
topic
and
then
also
to
create
issues
for
the
the
more
specific
granular
things,
and
we
can
close
this
one
when,
when
those
new
issues
are
created,
so
we
don't
lose
that
thread.
Okay,.
A
Sounds
good
all
right,
great
and
then
the
last
one
is
issue.
632
provide
implementation
guidance
for
dcocla
robin
you
commented
on
october
12th.
B
E
Yeah,
so
we
yes,
the
the
tld,
is
that
the
linux
foundation
will
be
taking
this
project
in-house
and
that's
really
really
exciting.
There's
a
lot
of
projects
that,
when
this
kind
of
popped
up-
and
there
were
there,
was
us
there
was
hyperledger
open
ssf
a
lot
of
groups
were
like,
oh
no,
no!
No!
No!
E
We
want
this
so,
thankfully,
the
that
I
think
the
parties
are
agreeing
that
that
would
make
sense,
so
it's
sort
of
in
process
for
how
to
like
port
that
over
and
who's
gonna
sort
of
be
leading
on
the
left
side,
but-
and
I
think
that
means
that
we
might
get
brian's
pr's,
unblocked
and
merged
in
so
like
this
is
this
is
a
a
w.
A
Is
this
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
I'm
looking
at
the
last
comments
on
the
probot
dco
issue,
162
and
they're
having
conversations
with
github
as
well.
B
B
E
A
I'm
like,
I'm
not
so
sure,
just
I,
I
think
the
it's
open
source
project
so
there's
that
I'm
not
sure
what
the
execution
path
for
this
exactly
looks
like
just
that.
There's
general,
like
agreement
and
willingness
and
excitement
for
the
lf
to
become
new
maintainers
of
this
project
in
some
meaningful
way,
which
would
allow
us
to
continue
to
work
on
it
and
consume
it
and
which
is
great
so.
A
E
A
Very
cool
all
right-
and
this
is
maybe
a
dumb
question,
but
you
know
gregor
is
aware
of
what's
going
on
and
then
you
know
is
aware
as
much
as
he
needs
to
be.
I.
E
B
F
Joe,
I
believe
he
is
yeah.
Okay,
I've
been
involved,
yeah.
A
Yup,
do
we
have
anything
else?
I
know
we
should
talk
about
next
working
session.
E
We
should
talk
about
next
working
session.
We
talk.
We
should
talk
about
the
calendar
for
the
rest
of
the
year,
because
we
are
moving
into
that
that
period
of
time,
where
we're,
where
we've
got
vacations
and
things
like
that
per
my
2021
cpc
meeting
schedule
issue,
which
is
issue
739.
E
We
have
a
working
meeting
on
tuesday
of
next
week,
followed
by
regular
meeting
december
14th
working
meeting
december
21st
a
regular
meeting,
so
this
starts
to
get
closer
to
holidays
we've
canceled
the
december
28th
meeting
for
the
holidays.
Let
me
ask
if
we
think
that
we
need
to
cancel
the
december
21
meeting,
which
is
a
regular
meeting
for
the
holidays
as
well.
E
E
Okay,
cool
so
I'll,
edit
that
to
cancel,
which
means
that
we
have
two
opportunities
for
working
meetings
remaining
in
the
in
this
year
and
so
one
we
just
identified.
E
A
Looking
at
the
calendar,
I
even
wonder:
should
we
convert
the
december
7th
meeting
to
a
working
meeting
and
just
try
to
have
these
last
three
meetings.
Like
you
know,
progress
working
meetings,
I
don't
know
just
the
thought
I
had.
E
That's
not
a
bad
idea,
I
mean,
I
certainly
feel
like.
We've
got
a
lot
of
momentum
on
certain
projects
and
that
that
would
be
good.
On
the
other
hand,
just
devil's
advocate
and
we've
got
potential
things
that
we
need
to
discuss
with
the
full
cpc,
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
you
know,
potentially
lose
that
opportunity
so
but
up
to
you
all,
I'm
super
open
either
way.
A
I
mean
yeah,
it's
a
good
point
we,
but
we,
I
suppose
we
could,
even
just
you
know,
run
through
the
agenda
quick
and
then
save
the
rest
of
the
cpc
meeting
for
working
on
something.
If
we
wanted.
B
And
just
a
quick
update,
we
did
hire
a
new
marketing
communications
lead.
She
begins
december.
First
can't
share
who
it
is
yet,
but
we're
pretty
excited
about
that.
A
A
Okay,
will
you
update
that
issue
jory
and
then
maybe
we
should
even
ping
the
cpc
slack
channel
just
letting
folks
know
what
to
expect
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
maybe
we'll
even
get
some
folks
to
join
in
some
of
the
working
stuff.
A
Great-
and
I
suppose
you
know
from
now
until
the
end
of
the
year,
my
work
gets
a
little
bit
quiet.
So
I'll
try
to
jump
into
some
of
these
issues
and
prs
that
we
still
have
open
that
list
of
documents
and
things
like
that.
Try
to
get
some
things
going
and
boy.
I
would
love
to
get
the
tooling
set
up
to
take
minutes
and
put
them
into
the
repo
and
all
that
stuff.
Yours.
F
A
F
A
That
journey
fear
is
welcome.
Yes,
I
know,
I
think
about
it
all
the
time
I'm
out
walking
the
dogs
thinking
about
like,
and
I
want
to
just
get
that
done.
Thank
you
and
jory
and
michael,
I
know
you.
You
two
have
committed
some
meetings
lately.
Thank
you.
The
notes.