►
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
Alright
and
we
are
live
thanks-
everyone
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
the
4th
of
august
and
yeah
thanks
everybody
for
joining
the
issue
is
606
for
the
agenda
and
do
we
have
any
announcement
or
announcements
or
anything
we
want
to
talk
about
before
we
get
into
the
agenda.
B
A
couple
of
things
announcement
wise,
you
know
we
it's
a
light
meeting
week
for
the
foundation,
so
that's
kind
of
nice,
but
we
do
have
some
project
news.
Q-Unit
launched
a
new
snazzy
website
which
we're
really
excited
for
them.
That's
been
a
process
of
migrating
off
on
a
wordpress
multi
site
and
it
looks
really
great
so
congrats
to
the
q
unit
team
for
getting
that
out
the
door.
It
looks
wonderful
and
the
other
thing
that's
happening
right
now.
That's
announcements
worthy.
B
Is
that
we're
running
the
election
for
the
end
user
and
silver
member
board
seats,
and
that
should
be
wrapping
soon.
So
we
should
have
news
there.
I
think
that's
it's
from
like
unless
somebody
else
is
aware
of
some
other
project
news
that
I
may
have
missed
and
it's
been
sort
of
a
quiet
week,
yeah.
A
I
mean
I
have
something
that
I'll
just
mention
as
an
announcement,
even
though
I
think
it's
on
the
agenda,
but
you
know
electron
joined
as
an
impact
project
and
shelley
and
tierney
are
going
to
be
their
voting
members,
so
I
just
opened
a
pr
for
that,
but
I
think
you
know
there's
nothing
controversial
there.
So
it's
something
to
celebrate
and
announce
yay
welcome.
B
A
B
A
Cool
yeah,
so
there's
a
pr
open
for
that,
but
I
think
it's
in
the
agenda.
So,
oh
actually,
it's
the
first
item
on
the
agenda.
This
is
issue
number
604.
I
don't
even
know
why
I'm
necessarily
opening
it,
but
I
think
that
this
was
you
know.
The
team
was
aware
of
this,
I'm
already
working
on
it.
So
when
I
created
the
issue,
things
were
already
in
motion
and
I
have
pr
608
open
to
add
them
to
the
readme.
A
I've
already
add
folks
to
the
some
of
the
teams,
and
I
think
that
you
know
things
are
cool,
so
yeah.
Welcome
next
on
the
agenda
is
issue
601
and
again,
if
folks
can
help
with
some
notes.
That
would
be
great.
I
see
someone
typing,
but
more
than
one
is
always
helpful.
A
A
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
things
we
need
to
work
out
here
and
I
think
the
the
the
big
thing
is
whether
we
run
both
elections
right
now
or
we
like
kind
of
vote,
to
extend
one
of
the
seats
for
six
months.
The
the
thought
is
that
we
wanted
to
go
to
a
staggered
election
cycle,
but
the
question
is:
do
we
vote
for
both
of
them
and
have
only
one
be
there
for
six
months
and
then
run
another
election?
A
Or
do
we
just
extend
one
of
them
by
six
months
and
only
have
one
election
right
now.
A
C
D
B
C
A
Well,
I've
had
some
complaints,
but
I'm
just
kidding
so
if,
if
that
were
to
be
the
path
forward,
the
next
question
then
becomes
which
one
do
we
extend
and
which
one
do
we
leave
in
place
and
to
me
it
seems
like
we
would
extend
the
cpc
director's
seat,
which
is
the
one
that
chris
is
occupying
right
now
and
the
node.js
specific
seat.
A
A
My
first
question
is:
does
that
make
sense,
and
then
my
second
question
would
be
chris
you're
on
the
call
here.
Would
that
be
something
you
would
be
amenable
to?
If
that
were
the
path
that
we
were
to
go
down.
E
A
A
So
how
do
we,
how
do
we
make
this
decision
in
a
way
that
is,
you
know
that
we
get
people's
voices
in
it
and
do
we
like
vote
on
this
process?
Do
we
open
an
issue
or
vote
in
that
particular
issue,
or
how
do
we
move
forward
on
this
particular
question?.
C
F
C
Up,
like
you
know,
consensus
two
weeks
that
whole
process,
if
we
want
to
do
it
faster,
I
mean
we
could
just
reach
out
to
everyone
individually
and
ask
them
to
voice
their
opinion
quickly.
So
we
could
try
to
speed
it
up,
but
it's
up
to
you,
I
think,
that's
the
process,
so
we
should
follow
it,
even
though
it's
a
little
slow.
If
we
don't
push
it.
A
Which
I
can't
recall
is
that
two
weeks
or
or
quorum
or
something
I
always
think
it's.
C
A
A
Which
we
don't
have
today,
obviously
so:
okay,.
C
We
could
send
the
list
just
a
note
about
it
and
just
say:
hey
we're
hoping
to
get
quorum
next
week
to
decide.
F
C
A
Okay
and
then
I
mean
we
could
even
start
running
the
one
election.
Maybe
that's
what
people
are
saying
immediately
as
we
work
through
the
pr
for
the
the.
A
Other,
so
I
don't
hear
anyone
like
kind
of
raising
any
objections
or
complaints
or
concerns.
I
guess
this
may
be
an
accurate,
better
word
jory.
What
do
you
have?
I.
B
Just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
capturing
kind
of
the
the
action
correctly
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
with
a
pr
to
extend
the
node.
I'm
sorry
extend
the
cpc
director
seat
six
more
months
and
to
run
an
election
as
soon
as
possible
for
the
seat
currently
occupied
by
node,
and
you
want
us
to
start
the
14-day
governance
approval
process
via
pr
now,
but
also
send
an
email
out
to
the
list
to
see
if
we
can
get
quorum
on
yes,
faster
than
in
14
days.
G
F
A
So
there
are
two
seats,
so
the
the
seat
that
michael
dawson
is
currently
holding.
We
could
open
up
that
election
immediately,
assuming
that
there's
no
change
to
that
process
and
then,
if
we
are
staggering,
then
we're
changing
governance
to
say
that
the
seat
that
chris
is
occupying,
we
would
extend
for
six
months
and
then
have
that
election
okay.
So
we
could
move
forward
yeah.
B
A
Yeah
yeah
today,
which
I
think
is
just
you,
know,
declaring
it
in
an
issue
and
ask
folks
to
self-nominate
there
and
put
in
their
candidate
statement
and
what
have
you
and
we
can
get
nominations
and
then
move
to
an
election.
F
And
jory,
I
can
send
you
some
suggested
language
that
for
that
self-nomination,
okay,.
A
Get
it
done
great,
great
great
yeah,
and
then
I
I'm
not
sure
how
clear
that
this
is
in
the
governance
or
what
have
you
but
are
we
is
it
nominations
for
a
week
and
then
vote
for
a
week
or
or
do
we
take
longer
for
for
that?
I'm
trying
to
look
this
up.
It
might
be
in
the
charter.
F
A
A
Oh
god,
so
much
paperwork-
I
don't
see
it
like
really
declared
anywhere.
Specifically.
There
is
mention
of
in
the
governance
about
non-impact
voting,
cpc
members
that
the
nomination
period
is
for
two
weeks
and
then
and
then
voting
will
start
a
week
after
the
nomination
period
ends
and
be
open
for
two
weeks.
This
is
not
impact
voting
cpc
members.
So
it's
not
we're
not
bound
to
that,
but
that's
kind
of
a
little
a
little
odd
that
we
maybe
want
to
just
visit
that
language.
A
A
B
I
think
we
should
do
one
week
in
one
week.
I
mean
this
is
certainly
something
we've
been
talking
about
for
a
while.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
people
that
we
would
would
be
interested
in
and
nominating
are
probably
aware.
B
I
mean
the
one
issue
is
that
this
week
does
seem
to
be
a
heavy
vacation
week.
So
and
maybe
we
do
open
it
starting
say
monday
just
to
because
if
michael
dawson's
out
on
vacation
this
week
and
others
are
out
on
vacation,
it
may
give
them.
C
A
Okay,
so
will
you
make
that
clearer
in
the
issue
jory.
A
All
right
cool,
well
that
settles
that,
or
at
least
gets
us
on
the
road
to
settling
that
we'll
have
to
get
that
pr
open
as
well.
Do
we
have
any
volunteers
for
the
pr
to
change
the
the
language
around
this
other
board
seat,
extending
it
for
six
months
and
such
any
volunteers.
A
A
A
All
right
great,
thank
you
chris.
I
really
appreciate
it
all
right
awesome!
That's
that
okay
cool
now
the
next
one
on
the
agenda
is
an
issue
that
I
opened
up,
but
I
think
that
the
board
has
approved
this
board
seat
definitions
and
process.
Michael
commented
a
few
days
ago
saying
that
the
board
vote
is
complete
and
approved
and
should
be
ready
to
go
so
I
will
land
this
puppy
after
the
meeting
or
somebody
wants
to
just
do
it
right
now.
That's
fine,
so
cool!
A
B
I
believe
he
had
intended
to
remove
that
from
the
agenda,
even
because
the
board
had
what
they
were,
but
you
know
what
chris
was
about
to
say
something,
and
he
knows
more
than
I
do.
E
All
right,
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
know,
michael
and
I
are
both
meeting
with
toby
next
week,
once
michael's
back
just
to
get
a
little
bit
more
clarification
on
some
of
the
requests
around
only
offering
an
icla.
E
So
I
don't
know
how
much
that'll
impact
this.
I
think
we're
more
just
trying
to
understand
the
request,
because
I'm
not
again,
I
don't
totally
understand
what,
if
why
offering
both
means
anything
I
mean
it.
If
a
project
only
wants
to
use
the
icla
or
a
company
only
wants
their
people
to
use
the
icla,
they
just
tell
them
to
do
that.
So
I'm
not
sure
why
there
needs
to
be
this
differentiation
of
particular
projects
being
able
to
just
offer
the
icla
so
yeah
we're
just
trying
to
get
some
clarification
on
that,
but.
B
G
B
Lay
with
program
management
because
functionally
it
doesn't
change
behavior
for
projects
is
that
right.
E
Right,
yeah,
it's
just
it's
a
matter
of
yeah.
I
believe
the
way
I
understand
it.
There
are
a
project
or
projects
that
are
wanting
only
the
icla
option,
but
the
way
that
our
tooling
works-
it's
they're
both
there,
but
if
a
company
doesn't
complete
a
ccla
for
their
employees
to
use
and
they
tell
them
to
use
the
iso
cla,
then
it
shouldn't
matter,
but
again
I
I
might
not
be
fully
understanding
the
requests.
So
that's
what
we're
trying
to
figure
out
but
we're
waiting
until
michael's
back
next
week.
B
I
I'll
I'll
take
us
onward.
So
no
no
action
item
here
for
us
today.
I
think
we
should
also
remove
the
label
the
meeting
label
on
this.
Just
because
there's
no
no
update
and
brian
can
keep
us
posted
if.
B
This,
I
think,
was
mostly
an
fyi.
We
had
a
community
member
who
wanted
to.
Let
us
know
that
there
there's
an
event,
a
hackathon
event
and
they're
looking
for
folks
to
help
mentor
and
participate
in
the
hackathon.
So
I
don't
think
that
there's
really
anything
to
discuss
or
anything
here,
but
just
excited
to
share
that
with
our
community.
If
you're
interested
in
participating.
C
C
F
If
you
missed
the
meeting
last
week,
we
at
the
broader
foundation
level
are
going
to
be
collaborating
with
major
league
hacking,
and
so
we've
been
brainstorming,
some
ideas
and
they're
going
to
come
back
to
us
with
some
proposals,
so
hopefully
lots
of
ways
to
participate
in
kind
of
ways
that
we
can
do
cool
things
that
scale
across
all
of
their
hackathons.
F
B
All
right,
no
action
needed.
We
can
remove
the
label
from
that
agenda
item
and
just
encourage
folks
to
go.
Go
meet
deep,
let's
just
beep
love
car
key
on
github.
If
you
have
more
questions
and
want
to
get
involved.
B
Next
up
issue
number
547,
which
is
governance,
changes
for
collaboration
network.
This
is
one
that
michael
dawson
has
really
been
driving
this
and
I
need
to
don't
know
what
the
status
is.
I'm.
E
F
Brian's
on
vacation
this
week,
so
if
you
need
anything
earlier,
then
I
can
help
get
it
done
so.
B
I
don't
think
that
there's
urgency,
I
think
it's
just
one
of
those
things
that's
been
ongoing,
so
I
I
think
this
can
wait
until
brad's
back
and
some
of
the
other
votes
have
come
through
we're
keeping
the
board
busy
with
with
stuff.
I
think.
E
B
All
right
issue,
414
or
pull
requests.
Sorry
4
14..
This
should
be
the
pull
request.
Oh
did
I
just
skip
ahead?
No,
no.
I
just
confused
myself
pull
request.
414
adds
foundation,
copyright
guidance
which
we
don't
this
was.
This
is
also
toby's
task
that
I
think
has
been.
B
Toby's
not
with
us
today
so
we'll
move
on,
but
I
wonder
if
there
was.
I
think
this
was
a
mistake.
This
is
labeled
and
my
document
responsible
security
disclosures,
but
this
is.
B
So
no
update
here
now
number
326.
Let's
see
if
this
got
just
sort
of
yeah
number
326
is
responsible
security
disclosures
this
one.
B
It
has
an
open
pull
request,
pull
request,
number
602
to
remove
to
move
the
security
reporting
proposal
to
stage
three.
So
with
this
with
this,
I
believe
what
we
are
there's
some
changes
that
that
marcin
looks
like
he's
gonna
make
to
this
pull
request,
but
assuming
we
have
no
further
direction,
this
will
would
now
need
to
advance
from
our
group
to
the
to
the
board.
B
Does
anybody
have
happen
to
have
perhaps
from
the
node
community
any
news
or
updated
information?
Aside
from
what
marcin
had
for
us
like
six
days.
B
B
Okay,
well,
it
looks
like
there's
just
again
a
few
changes
from
marcin
that,
once
those
are
in,
we
can.
B
And
then,
last
but
not
least,
is
number
607,
which
is
next
steps
for
the
supporter
program
and
sarah's
on
the
call.
So
I
can
totally
let
sarah
speak
to
this
one.
H
Great
for
next
steps,
so
I
put
together
a
synchronous
meeting,
a
doodle
for
people,
so
we
can
talk
about.
I
think
we've
really
reached
a
consensus,
though,
about
a
lot
of
the
the
foundational
stuff,
but
I
think
there
are
open
questions
about
what
should
be
implemented
by
who,
when
what
a
marketing
rollout
looks
like,
I
think,
the
foundational
work
or
the
the
very
the
50
000
foot
view.
I
think
everything
or
mostly
everything
is
agreed
on.
So
next
up
our
meeting
I
put
a
doodle
together.
H
I
don't
know:
if
that's
how
we
do
things,
the
link
is
in
the
issue.
If
people
could
take
a
look,
I'll
also
put
it
into
chat
right
now,.
F
B
F
E
B
D
Excuse
me:
did
we
do
592,
or
did
we
skip
that
the
develop
annual
review
process
for
projects.
B
So
that
that
was
actually
that's
a
great
question,
because
I
was
taking
notes
at
another
part
of
the
document
and
then
I
thought
oh,
I
must
have
missed
whatever
joe
said
about
that.
I
will
watch
the
call
again
later,
so
I'm
not,
I
don't
know,
did
we
does
anybody.
Remember
discussing
592,
say
20
minutes
ago.
B
Okay,
let's
discuss
it
then
thank
you
chris
hiller.
So
this
is
the
proposal
or
a
a
proposal
that
is
needed
for
developing
a
review
process.
B
I
think
the
idea
was
to
focus
initially
on
supporting
the
review
process
for
growth
projects
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
we're
helping
to
support
those
projects
in
the
way
that
they
are
looking
for.
There's
been
some
discussion
on
the
thread
about
you
know
how
to
proceed.
Chris,
I
know
you've
been
active
on
that.
Do
you
want
to
try
and
summarize,
for
everyone
kind
of
where
the
discussion
is.
D
Yeah,
so
this
is,
it
seems
like
this
is
one
of
those
that
can
be
split
into
several
issues,
but
so
yeah
there's
supposed
to
be
an
annual
review
process
where
I
don't
know
what
happens
exactly
there,
but
there's
supposed
to
be
something,
and
we
need
to
determine
that.
D
The
stage
is
where
they
should
be,
and
that's,
I
think,
that's
fine
and
good,
but
you
know
if,
if
you
have
a
project
in
growth,
for
example,
and
you
go
and
you
reach
out
to
them
every
year,
I
feel
like
that's
going
to
be
insufficient.
D
So
there's
also
this.
This
whole
idea
about
growth
projects
they
need,
they
need
goals,
they
need
to
work
with
a
cpc
to
set
goals
for
their
growth
and
with
an
eye
towards
we.
This
was
mentioned.
I
think
it
was.
D
It
was
not
clear
to
people
if
being
in
growth,
is
supposed
to
be
temporary
and
you're
supposed
to
be
in
growth
for
a
while
and
then
either
move
into
impact
or
to
at
large
at
some
point,
so
there
needs
to
be
like
some
goals
set
for
for
for
these
growth
projects,
at
least
from
from
the
way
I
see
it.
D
In
addition,
you
know
because
we're
looking
at
this
every
year,
you
know
I
that's
just
like
not
enough,
it's
not
enough
hands-on.
I
think
that
growth
projects
are
going
to
need
a
champion
or
a
mentor
of
some
sort,
somebody
that
checks
in
with
them
every
couple
weeks,
maybe-
and
you
know-
make
sure
that
that
they're
making
progress
towards
their
goals
answering
any
questions.
The
project
may
have
yada
yada.
So
it's
it's
like
three
different
things,
but
you
know
I
would
certainly
be
so.
D
As
you
know,
mocha
is
my
project.
Mopa
is
a
growth
project.
I'm
probably
you
know.
I'm
gonna
want
to
set
goals
for
mocha
with
an
eye
towards
towards
moving
into
impact
eventually,
but
I'm
going
to
need
to
meet
with
the
cpc
or
I
don't
know
how
we
want
to
do
that-
to
determine
what
those
goals
are.
D
But
then
I
would
I
would
hope
there
is
somebody
from
the
cpc
or
the
foundation
that
works
with
our
project
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
meeting
those
goals,
and
so
I
would
be
interested
in
being
a
mentor
or
or
a
champion
for
other
growth
projects.
That
sounds
like
something
I'd
really
be
interested
in,
but
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
for
me
to
do
my
own
project.
That
being
said
so
yeah
that
that's
kind
of
that's
the
gist
all
of
it
so.
H
It
sounds
like
I
was
reading
a
bit
about
this.
It
sounds
like
and
listening
to
you
what
you're
saying
it
sounds
like
that
this
would
be
a
valuable
resource
in
general
for
growth
projects,
and
it
also
sounds
like
putting
myself
in
the
in
the
shoes
of
someone
that
is
a
maintainer.
I
know
that
some
people
may
find
it
really
valuable
to
have
mandatory
check-ins,
and
some
people
may
find
it
to
be
really
difficult.
I
it
sounds
like
it
almost
sounds
like
a.
H
I
don't
want
to
say.
Older
sibling
project
would
be
good,
but
is
this
something
that
maintainers
of
a
project
that
is
larger?
That's
farther
along
the
getting
hack
project
could
have
open
office
hours
or
do
you
think
it
would
be
having
it
more
structured
like
it
sounds
like
yeah
having
it
more
structured
would
be
valuable,
rather
than
an
open
office
hours
time
that
people
could
join.
D
I
mean
that
probably
depends
on
the
project.
I
know
that
my
experience
in
js
foundation,
you
know
we
we
were
assigned
moko
was
assigned
mentors,
but
it
didn't
really
like.
There
was
no
structure,
there
were
like
no
expectations
really,
and
so
it
just
didn't
pan
out,
you
know.
D
So
it's
that's
that's
why
I
think
that
the
structure
is
maybe
maybe
needed.
I
mean
we
can
always
go
back
and
change
it,
but
and-
and
maybe
some
projects
don't
want
that
they
don't
feel
like
they
need
it.
But
you
know
these.
These
are
growth
level
projects.
I
don't
know
that
that's
that's
kind
of
a
wide
net
right.
That's
that's
different.
These
are
projects
looking
to
grow
and
reach
the
next
stage.
D
H
If
you
don't
mind
yeah,
that
all
makes
a
ton
of
sense,
I
think
it
would
be
really
easy
to
constantly
opt
out
of
them,
and
you
know
I
would
do
you.
Could
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
as
a
growth
project
some
of
the
things?
That
would
be
really
this
actually
like
a
check-in
point,
that
is,
you
know
modern,
like
helping
with
progress.
It
would
be
helpful
to
understand
maybe
some
of
the
specific
mentorship.
That
would
be
helpful.
H
D
I'm
not
sure
I
can
really
answer
that,
yet
I
think
that's
going
to
depend
on
the
goals
that
we
set.
So
where
do
we
need
to
get
to
to
reach
the
next
stage
and
from
there
I
can
say,
okay,
you
know
I'm
confident
we
can
do
x,
y
and
z,
but
I'm
gonna
need
help
with
this
other
thing.
D
So
it's
it's
gonna,
be
tough
to
say
I
don't
think.
There's
like
a
you
know.
I
certainly
can't
speak
for
other
projects,
but
I
can't
speak
for
even
what
we
need
exactly
from
a
mentor
until
we
know
what
we
need
to
do.
H
D
Right
so
when
we
signed
on
as
a
growth
project,
you
know
how
the
way
I
understood
it
and
how
I
explained
it
to
the
other
maintainers
was
we're
going
into
the
growth
stage.
What
we
want
to
do
is
reach
impact
stage
to
do
that,
we
need
to
work
with
the
cpc
and
set
goals
to
get
there
and
so
those
goals,
that's
kind
of
that's
kind
of
the
big
question.
What
those
goals
are
going
to
be
for
mocha.
H
Got
it
got
it,
so
is
the
okay
well
I'd
love
to
be
helpful
with
this
project?
I
think
this
seems
like
a
good
something,
a
neat
thing
to
be
a
part
of,
as
well
as
helping
to
understand
what
projects
are
facing
on
this
path.
So
we
know
that
there's
an
active
issue
and
I
know
you're
talking
about
it,
but,
however,
I
can
be
helpful
also.
It
seems
like
there's.
This
is
a
two-way
thing
right.
H
This
is
both
working
with
the
cpc
to
establish
growth
goals,
which
was
that
left
with
you,
as
this
is
something
we
need
to
do
and
then,
like
next
steps,
are
kind
of
like
on
your
end,
or
is
this
something
that's
upcoming.
D
I
may
not
have
understood
it
accurately.
I
feel
like
I
did,
which
was
so.
You
know,
growth
projects
need
these
goals,
they're
not
supposed
to
stay
in
growth
stage
forever,
and
so
essentially
you
know,
we've
been
onboarding
and
that's
taken
a
long
time,
and
you
know
I
I
I
mean.
Certainly
I
could
have
pushed
a
lot
harder
to
to
start
this
sort
of
process,
but
I
knew
that
we're
still,
maybe
maybe
we
are
still
onboarding
projects
that
need
to
be
onboarded.
D
I
felt
like
that
kind
of
needed
to
be
happen
first
or
needed
to
happen
first
before
we
could
start
talking
about
this
other
stuff,
but
maybe
not
so
yeah,
essentially
I'm
just
kind
of
waiting
for
a
an
opportunity
to
to
work
with
the
cpc
on
it.
You
know
where's,
the
bandwidth
you
know.
Do
we
want
to
split
off
like
a
subgroup
off
of
the
cpc
to
to
work
with
growth
projects.
D
I
don't
know,
but
you
know
we
were
just
talking
about-
let's
not
burn
out
on
this
stuff,
so
I'm
thinking
like
well,
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
whole
lot
of
wiggle
room
where
I
could,
where
I
could,
you
know,
get
in
there
and
say:
okay,
we
need
we
need
to
work
with
you
to
set
these
goals.
D
H
H
Yeah
yeah,
that
makes
sense,
would
it
make
sense-
and
this
is
a
question
to
everyone
here-
would
it
make
sense,
as
next
steps
to
work
directly
with
mocha,
to
determine
some
of
those
goals
run
them
past
other
members
of
the
cpc
and
then
based
on
that
or
maybe
moca
and
one
other
project
come
up
with
a
process
for
this,
so
it's
easily
repeatable
and
and
that
might
include
the
mentorship
check-ins.
That
kind
of
thing.
F
What
one
suggestion
I
have,
I
just
did
a
call
with
the
chaos
community
team
and
there's.
F
G
F
And
then
I
know
at
the
linux
foundation
we
can
pull
some
metrics
for
you.
I
believe
that
some
of
the
same
methods
that
github.
D
I
don't
no,
I
mean
so.
I
would
like
to
work
on
defining
these
I'd
like
to
work
with
other
projects,
maybe
that's
helping
to
set
goals,
helping
on
the
the
mentoring
or
champion
front,
but
so
I
don't
want
to
do
mocha
first,
so
I
would
like.
D
H
D
I
I
would
like
to
work
with
another
project,
yeah
and
and
then
and
then
like
somebody
can
work
with
me.
Maybe
it
can
happen
at
the
same
time.
I
don't
know,
but.
H
Well,
chris,
can
I
offer
maybe
we
can
follow
up
online
and
maybe
it's
just
about
discussing
the
issue,
but
I'd
love
to
be
helpful.
If
I
can
so
maybe
we
can
look
at
the
chaos
guidelines
and
discuss
back
next
steps,
I'm
happy
to
meet
a
meet
sync
or
just
talk
async
on
the
issue.
Whatever
is
most
helpful.
C
Yeah
one
thing
I
was
going
to
suggest
that
would
help
is
like.
I
know
that
dojo
and
intern
still
have
to
go
through
their
checklist
and
chris
still
has
to
go
through
parts
of
his
and
I'm
sure
some
other
projects
did
as
well.
Maybe
we
can
do
some
of
this
in
groups
rather
than
like
someone
having
to
do
the
full
on
boarding
with
each
project
separately
that
we
still
need
to
do
because
I
know
it
would
certainly
save
me
time
if
I
could
do
both
digital
and
intern.
H
B
I
I
like
the
idea
of
like
working
in
groups.
I
think
that
will
help
people
feel
you
know
some
excitement
to
complete
the
tasks
which
each
individual
task
is
not
super
exciting.
Necessarily
it's
just
sort
of
like
a
chore,
and
I
think
that's
part
of
part
of
why
you
know
so
that
would
that
would
be
awesome.
I
think
you
know
we
can.
We
can
maybe
even
suggest
a
list
of
projects
to
kind
of
work
together
on
there.
D
Also,
it
doesn't
look
like
nick's
on
this
call,
but
node
red
is
a
growth
project
I
can
reach
out
to
nick
and
see,
if
he's
be
interested
in
working
on
that
as
well.
B
And
I
think
web
drivers
as
well,
so
you
know-
and
I
know
christian's
really
active
so
I
I
could
see
several.
I
could
see
that
maybe
taking
we
have
six
growth
projects
and
I
can't
see
us
saying:
let's
split
them
into
two
teams
and
you
know.
G
B
Go
through
that
go
through
the
onboarding
process
and
I
really
want
to
get
like
diplomas
for
all
the
projects
for
the
graduation.
G
B
G
G
D
I
can
I
can
take
that
task.
I
don't
know
if
you
like
assigned
it
to
somebody
or
you
were
gonna,
do
it,
but.
B
I
didn't
assign
it
to
anyone.
I
just
wrote:
I
just
wrote
ai
in
the
list,
I'm
happy
for
you
to
take
it
if
you,
if
you
would
like
and
reach
out
to
me
if
you
need
help
okay,
so
I
think
we
now
we
got
through
all
the
issues.
B
B
Yeah,
I
I
don't
think
we
we
certainly
don't
have
anything
to
tackle
in
in
private
session
today
that
I'm
aware
of
so,
I
think
we're
probably
good
for
now.
I
think
this
was
a
very
effective
meeting
and
I
thank
you
all
for
coming
hope
if
you're
on
the
east
coast,
that
you
are,
that
you
stay
dry,
if
you're
in
the
midwest,
that
you
stay
cool,
how
hot
it
is
on
the
pacific
coast
right
now,
but.