►
From YouTube: OpenJS Foundation Standards Team
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Cool
we
are
live,
and
this
is
a
meeting
of
the
openjs
foundations
cross
project
council
standards
working
group.
We
have
a
few
of
our
friends
we're
missing
a
few
of
our
friends
today,
because
they
are
at
standards,
meetings
and
there's
always
the
standards
of
meeting
somewhere
in
the
world
on
any
given
day
at
any
given
time,
and
that
is
where
they
are
so
hope,
you're
having
fun
y'all,
we
start
with
announcements.
A
B
Let
me
jog
my
memory.
Oh
yes,
of
course,
version
16
went
live
today.
Yay
if
you
go
to
nodejs.org
whatever
slash
releases,
you
can
see
the
schedule
but
yeah
16
went
live
today
and
that's
exciting.
B
A
In
in
less
exciting,
but
still
important
and
related
news,
the
marketing
committee
meeting
is
just
after
this
one.
If
you
want
to
stick
around
and
and
join
us
for
the
foundation
marketing
discussions,
where
we
talk
about
how
we
can
get
the
word
out
about
our
projects,
please
do
we
also
have
a
board
meeting
on
friday
and
there's
typically
a
public
session
after
that.
A
So
we
welcome
folks
to
to
come,
attend
that
as
well
and
oh
another
just
sort
of
like
announcement
type
thing
in
just
over
a
week
from
now
marcos,
caseros
from
the
w3c
who
is
the
new
chairperson
of
that
spec
editors,
community
group
I
mentioned
at
our
last
meeting
and
also
in
slack
he
lives
in
australia,
okay,
so
which
means
that's,
basically
the
moon.
A
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
it
means
I
will
be
getting
up
at
8am
to
join
a
call
for
him
at
like
midnight
and
we're,
but
we're
gonna
have
a
special
meeting
just
to
make
that
happen.
He's
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
community
group
and
we'll
record
that
for
our
community
you
know
we
make
it
work,
so
I
I
think
that's
it.
Announcement.
C
Wise,
oh
robin's
got
one
this.
The
last
thing
this
week
we'll
be
publishing
our
schedule
for
speakers
at
openjs
world
we're
just
updating
the
website.
Now
speaker
notifications
already
went
out,
so
you
should
see
that
in
the
next
day
or
two
as
soon
as
we
have
everything
ready
to
go
live.
So
if
you
have
not
registered,
go
to
openjsworld.com
and
we'll
just
send
you
nice
little
calendar
reminders,
it
is
free.
A
Great
great
call,
that's
a
good,
of
course.
That's
happening.
That's
like
one
of
many
things:
okay,
cool,
so
moving
from
the
announcements,
then,
unless
there's
others
we'll
go
into
our
agenda
for
today,
some
of
our
items,
one
of
our
items
in
particular
we're
going
to
make
listed
items
we're
going
to
make
a
private
session,
which
is
the
discussion
on
our
statement.
A
So
that's
a
surprise
for
that.
The
first
item
is
dealing
with
recurring
cpc
working
session.
I
believe
we
settled
this
last
week.
I
need
to
adjust
the
I
learned
today
that
what
I
have
to
do
is
move
the
calendar.
Invite
and
then
the
node
like
make
meeting
tool
will
automatically
fix
it
and
joe
has
offered
to
help.
A
So
I
think
that
will
resolve
that
periodic
issue
that
we
have
popped
up,
but
just
to
remind
everyone
on
those
days
where
we
do
have
this
or
actually,
I
think,
maybe
generally
moving
forward
we're
going
to
have
this
meeting
at
1pm
eastern
so
an
hour
earlier,
and
that
should
fix
us.
A
A
A
Just
kind
of
trying
to
compile-
and
I
think
especially
with
some
attention-
that's
being
kind
of
turned
toward
how
do
we
help
people
gain
the
skills
that
they
might
need
or
want
to
have
when
it
comes
to
getting
involved
in
standardization
activities?
Sort
of
like
the
context,
you
know
what
kinds
of
things
would
be
good
to
read.
What
kind
of
you
know
videos
or
things
we've
got.
A
We've
got
a
nice
little
list
that
is
compiling
here
and
we
brainstormed
on
several
last
week.
I
think
this
is
obviously
something
we'll
continue
to
add
to
it's,
not
an
exhausted
list.
I
think
our
question
is
that
we
we
started
to
discuss
but
not
make
too
much
progress
with,
is
how
what
we
want
to
do
with
this
information
like
do
we
want
to
put
it
on
a
website
and
we
could
have
it
even
be
its
own
standalone
website.
So
anybody,
you
know
from
any
organization
could
say.
A
A
You
may
not
see
because
you're
in
the
web
standards
world,
but
here's
how
the
hardware
people
do
it
or
whatever
I
I.
I
think
I
think
the
conversation
kind
of
got
cut
off
there,
and
so
I'd
like
to
pick
it
back
up
for
a
few
minutes.
If,
if
folks
have
the
have
any
ideas
or
thoughts
on
the
matter.
D
A
We
could
do
I
mean
I
like
the
idea
of
I'll,
be
honest.
I
like
the
idea
of
a
website
for
a
couple
of
reasons,
and
it
could
be
a
totally.
A
C
A
curated
destination
and
in
our
marketing
committee
meeting
this
afternoon
we're
talking
about
a
way
that
we're
templatizing
websites
for
projects.
So
we
could
do
the
same
with
this,
but
we
can
have
a
little
more
fun
with
it.
We
could
give
it
a
name.
It
could
be
a
standalone
thing,
so
it
just
might
maybe
be
easier
to
find.
A
B
C
We
can
make
it,
you
know
it's
an
open,
js
foundation
program,
much
like
javascript
landia,
but
it
can
be,
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
Oh
openjs
law
branded.
A
D
A
I
mean
that
counterpoint,
although
I
am
I
do
like
you
know,
I
do
also
selfishly
think
it'd
be
great
for
to
have
openjs
all
over
it.
You
know
I
wouldn't
want
somebody
to
think
about
it,
run
into
it
and
think
oh
well,
this
is
just
this
stuff.
Just
applies
to
openjs,
for
example,
you
know,
and
so
we
just
would
want
to
make
it
clear.
I
think
that,
like
this
is
not
specific
to
openjs
but
has
been
put
together
by
the
openjs,
and
you
know
it's
it's
like
sdo
forum,
neutral.
A
Okay
yeah
so,
as
robin
said,
one
of
our
projects
q-unit
made
like
a
dead
simple,
like
very
nice
jekyll
template.
That's
that,
I
think,
is
what
we're
going
to
use
for
the
jslandia
program.
It
seems
like
something
that's
very
easy
for
us
to
kind
of
spin
up
and.
A
A
A
B
A
A
So
I
guess
the
the
request
here,
just
to
kind
of
close
this
out,
is
to
continue
adding
to
that
issue.
This
is
issue
number
130.
A
With
your
recommendations
like
things,
you
would
encourage
other
people
to
read
or
like
kind
of
dip
into
if
they
wanted
to
just
sort
of
learn,
and
the
second
thing
is,
I
guess,
more,
of
an
action
on.
A
Myself-
and
I
guess
brian
from
like
a
spinning
up
the
like
a
template
site
for
our
for
this,
and
we
got
a
cool
name.
So
that's
another
thing
find
it
think
of
a
cool
name,
the
mongooses.
A
All
right
move
into
unless
there's
anything
else
mike
or
cindell.
You
wanted
to
weigh
in
on
in
terms
of
the
resource
piece
like
what
would
be
helpful,
nope,
okay,
cool.
A
Let's
go
talk
about
what's
happening
in
our
different
sdo
communities
right
now,
so
obviously
there's
a
meeting
happening
today
and
to
or
yesterday
and
no
today
and
tomorrow,
which
is
the
tc39
two
day
meeting.
So
we
should
be
hearing
from
our
teammates
there.
What
new
things
are
up
for
discussion
and
looking
forward
to
getting
that
report
next
week
is
the
w3cs
advisory
council
meeting
and
they've
released
some
of
their
like
pre-videos
and
homework
and
stuff
for
us
to
review
and
be
prepared
with?
A
I
haven't,
had
a
chance
to
read
or
and
take
a
look
at
all
of
those
yet,
but
some
important
things
include
and
some
process
changes
specifically
related
to
what
they
call
the
director
free,
w3c
and
kind
of
some
changes
in
their
legal
entity.
That's
a
big
topic
for
the
ac
right
now
and
there's
also
a
handful
of
charters,
none
of
which
at
the
moment
are
particularly
pertinent
to
our
group.
A
For
example,
the
automotive
working
group
not
really
sure
you
know
that
we
need
to
weigh
in
on
that
charter,
but-
and
those
are
some
some
of
the
things
that
are
that
are
on
deck
and
as
things
come
in,
that
look
relevant
to
us
I'll
be
sending
that
out
on
our
standards,
email
list
for
you
all
to
to
weigh
in
on
and
then
last
but
not
least,
that
spec
ed
meeting.
A
As
I
mentioned
at
the
top
of
the
call,
the
repo
has
been
set
up,
there's
a
handful
of
about
you,
know:
15
20,
issues
of
tutorials
or
educational
things
that
marcos
and
and
team
want
to
create.
A
So
if
you're
interested
in
that
community
group,
anybody
can
sign
up
and
anybody
can
go
and
and
weigh
in
and
subscribe
and
start
watching
any
of
those
issues.
So
that
is
what
I
know
currently
about
and
then
there's
the
advisory
board
elections
which
will
be
opening
up
as
soon
as
the
nomination
period
closes,
which
is
sometime
this
month.
A
Yeah,
that's
what
I
know
about
w3c,
emily
anything
from
from
from
unicode.
You
want
to
share.
D
The
unicode
message,
format
working
group
is
continuing
right
now
we're
meeting
roughly
every
two
weeks.
The
last
meeting
was
actually
yesterday.
D
We're
still
have
been
for
four
or
five
months
now,
maybe
more
stuck
on
determining
exactly
the
shape
of
the
data
model
that
we're
gonna,
that
the
whole
spec
is
founded
around
and
the
latest
decision
is
effectively
due
to
rather
than
try
and
solve
the
issue
specifically
just
considering
the
data
model
is
to,
in
fact
start
doing
parallel.
Implementations
based
on
these
two
different
spec
versions
on
on
the
various
parts
of
the
whole
stack
that
forms
the
message:
format
to
standard.
D
The
well
one
of
the
I
have
strong
opinions
here,
because
one
of
the
two
models
being
used
is
primarily
written
by
zibi
braniecki
from
mozilla
and
myself
so
I'll.
D
My
part
here
is
to
do
effectively
next
time
implementing
the
tooling.
If
we
were
to
go
ahead
with
this
version
of
the
data
model,
then
have
the
whole
parsing
from
source
to
to
formulate
the
databall
and
then
having
a
runtime
on
top
of
that,
and
we'll
continue
to
be
reviewing
this
we're,
hopefully
going
to
sort
of
simultaneously
with
this
work,
soon
be
able
to
finally
get
to
talking
about
the
canonical
syntax.
D
For
this
whole
structure,
which
is
probably
the
biggest
open
question
for
which
we
don't
have
anything
yet
the
other
sort
of
deliverables
of
the
whole
project,
we
have
a
decent
idea
of
what
they're
gonna
be,
or
we
have
two
different
ideas
on
on
what
they're
gonna
be.
There's,
of
course,
many
things
still
to
do.
D
It'll
take
at
a
minimum
months
for
this
work.
To
conclude,
I
I
hope
it's
only
months,
but
it's
possible
it'll,
take
more
than
that.
That's
pretty
much!
What
we
at
the
moment.
A
Well,
I
guess
congrats
on
getting
to
this
point
cool.
Well,
thank
you
for
the
update
and
I
think,
we'll
kind
of
continue,
because,
because
you're,
you
had
an
item
for
private
session
that
might
build
on
this.
Let
me
ask
if
I'm
missing,
mike
or
joe
or
robin,
or
is
there
a
group
that
we
need
to
check
in
on.
A
Miles
is
our
osi
affiliate
he's
been
super
busy,
so
it
may
be
worth
paying
him
seeing
if
there's
anything
from
that.
C
They
are
yeah.
I
I
chatted
with
him
briefly
about
osi.
I
think
they
are
re-running
the
elections
or
yeah
for
the
board.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
all
were
tracking
that
I
think
there
was
maybe
a
a
process
error
and
so
just
to
be
thorough.
They're
having
an
outside
auditor
take
a
look
at
it
and
they're
rerunning
the
election.
A
All
right
sounds
not
so
fun
all
right,
any
other
business
for
our
our
public
chat.
If
not
we'll
we'll
close
this
early
and
go
to
talking
about
our
statements
and
stuff.