►
From YouTube: OpenJS Foundation Standards Team
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
A
We
are
working
today,
great,
live
streams
working
today,
fantastic
welcome
everyone.
It
is
April
the
4th
and
it's
the
standards
working
group
of
the
upland.js
foundation.
Fun
Club
is
what
I
will
call
us
today
and
we've
got
a
good
Full,
House
and
a
nice
agenda,
so
you
know
welcome
from,
and
thanks
for
thanks
for
tuning
in
we
start
with
announcements.
A
Does
anyone
have
any
announcements
or
news?
I
have
one
fun
thing
from
a
a
a
a
kind
of
cousin
community
of
ours,
the
graphql
foundation
has
announced
it's
event
is
happening
in
September
in
the
Bay
Area.
This
fall
September
19th
through
21st
San,
Francisco,
Bay
Area
graphql,
obviously
has
partnered
with
us.
They
were
part
of
our
open.js
world
and
then
with
their
Summit
and
the
summer
of
2022
way
back
when
and
we've
got
some
folks
in
the
JS
Community
we're
also
active
over
there.
A
So
anyway,
just
kind
of
sharing
sharing
the
love
a
little
bit
on
that
in
case,
you
are
listening
and
you're
interested
in
graphql
this
one
announcement.
We
have
other
announcements
too
related
to
the
openjs
standards
group,
but
they're
also
part
of
our
agenda
today.
So
I
won't
jump
the
gun
on
that
any
other
announcements,
Donovan.
B
Yeah
tc53
has
version
two
of
ecma
419.
B
Pretty
much
eminent
I
wouldn't
be
surprised
if
it's
released
in
the
next
couple
months
and
big
differences
are
they've
added
a
lot
of
asynchronous
classes,
which
will
be
exciting
for
a
lot
of
developers
me
especially
and
I've
also
added
a
lot
of
example,
peripheral
classes
to
help
guide.
Manufacturers
of
you
know,
Hardware
components,
so
that's
might
be
out
in
a
month.
A
That's
exciting
congrats
to
to
tc53
that's
pretty
big
news,
making
good
progress
as
always
congrats
Jordan.
C
A
Any
so
the
TC
met
between
now
and
the
last
time
that
we
met
were
there
any.
It
was
a
good
sag,
I
suppose
to
updates
from
the
TC.
If
there
were
any
any
big
pieces
of
of
exciting
news
to
share
from
the
from
the
meeting.
C
Yeah
there's
a
number
of
things.
Let
me
pull
it
up,
so
the
iterator.range
proposal
and
the
float
16
array
proposal
both
went
to
stage
two,
as
did
async
context,
there's
a
stage
one
proposal
for
a
weight
dictionary.
C
The
idea
that
you
can
you
know
like
promise.all,
takes
an
array
and
you
have
to
just
destructure
an
array
at
the
end.
This
is
where
you
pass
in
an
object
and
destructure
an
object
at
the
end.
C
Import
assertions
is
now
import
attributes
and
is
conditionally
stage
three
again.
So,
instead
of
the
assert
keyword,
it
would
use
the
with
keyword
and
it
has
slightly
different
requirements
on
it,
so
that
it
meets
what
the
web
needs
to
be
able
to
import
Json
and
CSS
and
whatnot.
C
There's
a
few
other
stage.
One
proposals
promise
dot
with
resolvers
so
like
the
ability
to
basically
get
a
deferred
time
zone
canonicalization,
that's
some
stuff
related
to
very
frequent,
politically
based
time
zone
changes
and
what
happens
with
temporal
and
date
and
how
that
works
and
then
class
method
parameter.
Decorators
is
also
stage
one.
C
I
think
so
it's
probably
on
their
Twitter,
but
they've
had
some
issues
with
the
one
of
their
domains,
so
I'm
not
sure
I'll
have
to
look
it
up
and
I'll
drop.
The
link
in
the
zoom
chat.
A
That
would
be
great
I'd
love
to
just
link
that
in
here
and
then
also
we
can
use
that
as
like.
We
can
retweet
that
and
stuff
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
I
think
those
summaries
are
super
good
and
okay
cool
any
other
updates
from
any
like
winter.
Cg
I,
don't
know
if
anybody's
been
heading
over
to
those
meetings
recently
or
any
w3c
news
I
feel
like
w3c
has
been
a
little
bit
quiet
lately,
quieter,
relatively
speaking,.
D
I
I
discussed
some
w3c
issues
in
in
GitHub
yesterday,
there's
a
there's,
a
Charter
proposal
that
closes
today
that
nobody's
opposed
to
that
on.
Basically,
machine
learning
apis
in
in
the
browser
that
you
know
is
is
considering
how
trendy
AI
is
these
days
might
have
been
something
we
wanted
to
to
touch
on,
but
you
know:
there's
no
controversy
there,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
somewhat
more.
Interestingly,
there
is
a
survey
for
all
the
members
to
try
to
give
guidance
to
the
board
committee.
D
That's
searching
for
a
CEO
I,
don't
know
you
might
want
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
see.
If
you
jury,
our
AC
rep
might
want
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
see.
If
there's
any
thing,
we
could
usefully
say,
I
I
think
we're
we're
in
an
interesting
position
because
we're
at
the
Nexus
of
Open
Standards
and
open
source
and
w3c
sort
of
still
lives
in
well.
D
You
know
the
Open
Standards
of
where
the
the
work
happens,
and
then
people
go
off
in
their
corners
and
Implement
and
then
just
come
back
and
test
and
that's
not
the
way
the
world
works
anymore,
especially
with
respect
to
JavaScript
Frameworks,
whether
we
have
any
guidance
or
you
know,
there's
something
to
be
said
for
trying
to
get
a
W3
CEO
who
had
a
sophisticated
understanding
of
how
the
web
development
ecosystem
really
works.
D
A
E
D
Did
do
this
week,
yeah
it's
only.
It
was
open
about
a
week
ago
and
I
hadn't
really
thought
about
it
until
you
know
the
this.
This
meeting
kind
of
that
gets
beat
this
meeting
on
the
calendar,
kind
of
gets
people
active
and
and
slack
and
GitHub
anyway,.
E
D
I
think,
having
a
you
taking
a
look,
see
if
there's
anything
you
would
propose
saying
or
throw
it.
You
know,
throwing
it
out
to
the
community
to
see.
If
we
have
can
draft
something.
It'd
be
my
suggestion.
A
Sounds
like
a
great
idea,
and
let
me
just
pop
that
actually
into
my
to
do
tools
so
that
I
can
make
it
make
it
so
before
a
deadline,
real
quick,
if
you
guys
don't
mind
that
is
good
to
do
all
right
right
on
any
other
updates
from
any
of
our
groups
today,
I,
don't
think
so.
I
think
we're
good
I,
guess
yeah.
A
We
can
move
on
to
our
agenda.
Then,
let's
see
item
Numero
Uno
on
our
list
today.
As
an
issue
215
cleanup
working
group
members
list,
this
is
quasi-related
to
just
like
General.
A
You
know,
hygiene
and
updating
that
we've
talked
about
in
173,
I
have
a
PR,
it's
PR
number
216
and
that
just
updates
the
readme.
Where
we've
got
that
list
of
folks
who've
raised
their
hand.
You
know
they're
I,
think
we
started
maintaining
this
list
back
at
a
node,
collab
Summit
or
something
like
in
2017
or
18,
or
it
was
a
long
time
ago.
So
some
of
these
folks
haven't
been
around
for
a
while.
A
What
we
don't
want
to
say
is
like
hey,
you're,
not
you're,
not
we're,
not
saying
hey,
you're,
not
part
of
the
the
group
anymore,
we're
just
saying
you're,
maybe
not
as
active,
so
we're
moving.
You
know
inactive
and
then,
of
course,
if
they
want
to
get
back
involved
and
they
start
showing
back
up
we'll
just
pop
them
back
up
too
to
the
active
side
of
that
list,
so
we're
keeping
that
historic
participation.
A
We
also
noted
an
oversight
that
somehow
Mike
champion's
name
wasn't
on
the
list
at
all
and
he
is
certainly
very
active.
So
that
is
that's
added.
A
A
None,
okay,
cool,
I'm
gonna
hit,
merge,
pull
request
and
get
that
done.
Thanks
very
much
that
let
me
make
that
little
note.
A
And
okay,
so
the
next
item
on
our
list
is
the
secure
the
web
forward,
Workshop
and
the
call
for
papers
there.
We've
been
talking
about
this
for,
like
several
weeks
now,
I
think
between
I
think
the
last.
At
the
last
meeting
we
announced
the
workshop
was
announced
officially,
and
so
we
we've
got
those
links
in
the
notes
for
you
all
there
to
help
us
promote
that
the
workshop
is
happening,
but
I
think
now
the
question
to
this
group
is
whom
we
should
be
encouraging
from
our
community.
A
A
This
is
going
to
be
a
real
working
kind
of
event.
So
it's
it's
not
a
you
know.
It's
not.
You
know
a
general
conference,
but
rather
oh
w3c,
Workshop,
so
yeah
so
I
think
I
want
us
to
spend.
A
If
we,
if
you
all,
don't
mind
a
few
minutes
just
reflecting
who
whom,
from
our
communities
our
openjs
community,
should
we
be
reaching
out
making
sure
they're
aware
I
think
jQuery
is
obvious:
they've
got
the
security
survey
that
they're
fielding,
and
so
that
should
that
should
definitely
you
know
be
proposed,
but
yeah
any
anybody
else.
You
know
we
need
to
make
sure
that
folks
are
aware
of
this.
B
I've
seen
folks
from
the
node
teamwork
or
attending
already.
A
So
I
know
that
I'm
not
I,
don't
know
for
sure
you
know
so
the
way
the
workshops
work
for
w3c
is.
You
know,
then
there's
like
an
application
to
propose
a
topic
and
then
come
and
like
do
sort
of
a
session
on
that
because
of
the
limited
space
they
are
also
asking
folks
to
you
know
apply
to
attend
so
that
you
know
it's
it's
a
it's.
A
The
right
level
of
of
this
is
not
going
to
be
a
good
spot
for
a
beginner
to
go
is
what
I'm,
trying
to
say
like
a
first-time
web
developer,
is
really
not
going
to
get
a
lot
out
of
this.
So
yeah
Toby.
G
Yeah
it's
funny
because
Dan
applequest
is
running
this
and
like
the
first
ever
Workshop
I
went
to
ever.
It
was
Dan
who
was
also
running
it
and
it
was
on
service
workers
and
it
was
like
15
years
ago.
So
it's
it's
just
like
it
feels
like
a
I.
G
Don't
know
it's
funny,
but
I
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
yeah
someone
that
is
new
to
to
web
development,
that's
going
to
be
a
little
challenging,
but
this
can
be
a
very
good
occasion
to
come
and
bring
a
use
case,
or
some
real
sort
of
like
developer,
focused
experience
and
be
new
to
standards.
G
It's
actually
a
really
great
way
to
get
into
it,
and
it's
often
the
case
in
those
workshops
that
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
people
from
the
standard
space
that
don't
necessarily
have
like
hands-on
experience
of
what's
Happening
actually
in
the
field,
and
it's
really
great
to
have
sort
of
like
it's
great.
If
the
jQuery
folks
come
for
example,
and
that
it's
not
only
sort
of
like
standard
people
that
are
there,
so
I
really
I
want
to
sort
of
offer.
G
I
mean
yeah
really
suggest
that
I'm
planning
to
to
go
and
I
don't
know
what
I'm
going
to
submit
and
also
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
say
is.
It
can
be
really
short.
Like
the
the
paper
I
wrote
for
the
first
time,
I
went
was
like
a
page,
and
it
was
you
know
just
like
here.
G
The
here
are
the
three
issues
that
we
have
was
like
the
standard
and
so
I
think
well
also
I'm
I'm
planning
to
go
and
I'm
also
happy
to
sort
of
like
help
a
coach
or
whatever
it
takes
to
get
folks
that
need
a
little
push
when
it
will
help
or
any
kind
of
like
suggestion
to,
and
they
can
just
reach
out.
I'm
I'm
happy,
though,
to
yeah
do
that.
A
That's
awesome,
that's
very
kind
of
you.
So
certainly
if
there's
folks
that
we
talk
to
I'm
going
to
say
Hey,
you
know
Toby
would
be
happy
to
review
your
paper
or
whatever.
That's
that's
awesome.
G
Mean
it's
close
enough
right
and
and
London's
nice
and
it's
you
know,
and
it's
it's
a
fun.
It's
going
to
be
fun!
It's
going
to
be
great,
like
it's
a
great
intersection
of
people,
intersection
of
communities,
so
yeah,
no
I'm,
looking
I'm
looking
forward
to
it!
Absolutely
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
don't
write
about
stuff
that
I
wanted
jQuery
folks
to
to
write
about
so
yeah
those
down.
A
Donovan
had
suggested
the
node
security
or
node.
Obviously
we
have
the
security
work.
That's
been
happening
with
the
I
think
thinks
part
to
support
from
the
alpha
omega
Grant
I
feel,
like
you
know,
it'd,
be
great
to
ask
them
to
present
something
about
some
of
the
work
that
they've
been
doing
under
that
Grant
and
some
of
the
problems
they've
been
having.
So
that
that'll
be
that's
that's
a
great
point.
We
should
make
sure
that
they've
seen
this
and
that
they
prepare
something
yeah
Toby.
Sorry.
G
Yeah,
no,
no,
on
the
Note
front,
there's
a
bunch
of
web
apis
that
have
been
included
in
like
the
more
recent
versions
of
node,
like
Fetch
and
all
of
that
stuff,
and
that
also
could
be
really
interesting
to
sort
of
like
have
feedback
on
this,
and
maybe
their
learnings
and
security
concerns
that
are
different
on
the
you
know,
on
the
Node
side
than
they're
on
the
front
end.
So
that's
also
something
that
might
be
interesting
to
dig
into.
E
Jerry
we
may
want
to
reach
out
individually
I'm
hearing
a
lot
of
people
are
struggling
with
travel
requests
and
funding
at
their
big
companies
or
small
companies.
So
finding
folks
who
are
local,
who
could
represent
or
european-based
yeah.
A
Yeah
and
and
I
you
know,
I
think
also
just
given
some
of
the
other
things
like
just
a
nice
warm
like
reach
out
individually
is
probably
the.
A
A
E
D
A
Well,
yeah,
so
that's
what
I
was
like
what
what
about
webpack?
Is
there
something
you
know
webpacky?
Maybe
Tobias
is
in
Germany,
so
that
I
think
I'm
not
mistaken.
So.
A
G
And
and
Jordan
all
of
what
you
was
talking
about
earlier
about
what
was
happening
in
tc39
in
terms
of
imports
and
all
of
that
stuff
could
also
be
relevant
topics
of
that
conversation,
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
A
Or
maybe
there's
just
more
of
like
a
and
this,
but
it
may
be
too
I
guess
this
would
be
something
for
the
programming
committee
for
that
event
to
discuss
is
like
just
like
Security
review
in
general
of
new
language
features.
I,
don't
think
that
that's
the
actual
angle
of
this
particular
Workshop,
but
there's
still
that
does
have
applicability
to
the
web
developer
community
so.
A
All
right,
these
are
good
ideas,
okay,
we'll
start
there,
I
guess
and
then,
and
we
can
kind
of
help
just
again,
keep
it
getting
the
word
out.
I,
don't
recall
off
the
top
of
my
head.
How
long
we
have
the
by
way
I
mean
the
the
programming
group
for
the
workshop
has
the
call
open.
A
A
G
Then
again,
like
I,
really
want
to
insist
like
how
like
use
cases
and
like
feedback
from
like
people,
is
usually
a
lot
more
valuable
than
like
elaborate
thoughts
about
how
standards
should
be
designed
right.
So,
like
concrete
problems
that
need
solving
is
great
food.
It's
a
great
thing
to
bring
to
the
conversation.
G
A
All
right
moving
to
our
next
agenda
item
standards,
group
participation
at
openjs
world
so
reminder
open,
JS
world
is
coming
up
in
almost
a
month.
It's
just
shy
of
a
month,
May,
9th
10th
11th,
so
I
just
come
to
Vancouver
for
the
whole
week.
Just
come
hang
out
the
whole
week
and
we
have
the
summit
on
on
the
9th
and
then
the
the
Conference
Track
10th
11th
12th.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
great
time.
A
We
have
two
items
that
are
related
to
this
issue:
205
the
Json
JS
landia
awardee
process.
A
There's
a
standards,
Pathfinder
award
I've
been
asking
you
all
to
think
about
whom
you
might
want
to
nominate
for
a
while
now.
Well
that
nomination
form
is
open
and
let
me
pop
it
in
the
slack
for
us
two
here
we
have
shared
this
I
think
on
Twitter
and
Linkedin
and
Mastodon
and
stuff
like
that
too.
So
you
can,
you
can
add,
go
find
it
there,
but
also
in
the
in
the
chat
in
particular
we're
looking
for
nominees
for
the
standards
Pathfinder
award.
A
Folks,
who've
made
a
big
difference
or
impact
for
our
communities
in
the
in
the
standardization
space
specification
development
space
we
have
until
April
18th,
that's
the
due
date
to
determine
who
we
as
a
committee,
would
recommend
to
receive
this
award
this
year
and
that
just
gives
the
team
time
to
to
order
the
award
and
have
that
there
for
for
the
event.
A
So
you
know
if
you'll
abide
me.
This
request.
I'm
gonna
pause
us
for
two
minutes.
While
you
click
on
that
form
and
nominate
somebody
and
I'm
gonna.
B
A
Don't
recall
who
you
nominated
but
I'm
sure
you
can
nominate
the
same
person
if
they
didn't
win
yeah,
so
I'm
going
to
do
the
same
thing.
I'm
going
to
nominate
someone
did.
A
Gave
it
to
Sevilla
from
the
Seligman
it's
a
group.
A
And
she
was
very
grateful
and
and
as
we've
done,
some
social
promo
of
just
like
the
event
and
end
this.
This
award
from
the
last
year's
nominees
are
are
saying:
oh,
that
was
so
nice
and
they're.
They're
still
happy
they're
still
grateful.
So
not
it's
not
for
everybody,
but
I.
Think
it's
just
a
lovely
thing
to
do
so.
I'm,
just
gonna
I'm
gonna
make
my
nominee
right
now.
A
You
can
do
multiple,
there's
no.
G
But
I
mean,
is
it
a
public
recognition
of
being
nominated
or
is
it
a
public
recognition
of
only
of
like
winning
the
category.
G
The
latter
okay,
no,
because
then
you
like
it's
not
like
you,
want
to
pick
one
in
that
case
right
if
it's,
the
latter
yeah
who
gets
to
vote
on
them
like
like
this
group,
does.
E
A
A
I've
got
mine
in
just
real
quick.
All
right
has
everybody
had
a
second
to
just
put
someone
in
very
cool
I
appreciate
that?
Okay?
So
that's
that's
that
one!
So
in
our
next
meeting
we
will
do
private
session
to
discuss
the
the
nominees
for
this
award
and
hopefully
be
able
to
come
up
with
a
conclusion
or
two
to
recommend
back
to
the
selection,
Committee
of
Robin,
rich
and
and
Jordan.
So
then
we'll
we'll
meet
our
deadline
for
for
them.
A
A
A
We
kind
of
determined
last
time
that
we
probably
weren't
going
to
have
enough
folks
in
person
and
all
of
that
to
weren't
having
a
a
meeting,
but
given
some
of
the
conversations
we've
been
having
with
guy
and
Leia
and
others
about
just
like
how
we
help
the
projects
use
us
more
efficiently
and
make
ourselves
more
more
present,
we
determined
that
a
session
at
the
collab
Summit
might
be
really
fruitful.
So
I
have
filed
a
an
issue.
It's
just
to
hold
the
spot
issue.
356
on
the
summit.
A
Repo
I
just
popped
that
issue
into
our
Zoom
chat
here
for
us,
but
this
is
a
proposal
that
I
have
kind
of
roughly
titled
how
to
leverage
the
foundation
and
cross
projects,
participation
for
standards,
with
the
goal
of
just
sort
of
addressing
maybe
some
patterns
that
the
projects
can
use
to
come
to
us
to
get
feedback,
get
support
and
and
and
so
on,
and
just
how
we
can
kind
of
be
more
helpful
to
note,
or
you
know,
appium
or
whomever
as
their
their
chewing
on
you
know.
A
How
do
we
provide
feedback
to
these
committees
or
so
on
and
so
forth?
Calling
it
kind
of
a
workshop,
mostly
because
I
think
we
want
to
do
like
a
quick
presentation
in
terms
of
you
know:
here's
who
we
are
here's
what
we
do:
here's
some
kind
of
guiding
parameters.
If
you
will
and
some
patterns-
and
then
you
know,
whoever
shows
up
if
they've
got
something
in
particular
that
they're
trying
to
accomplish
that
we're
able
to
maybe
spend
some
time
on
whatever
that
might
be.
A
So
that
would
be
the
kind
of
format
and
then
obviously
anyone
who
is
here
from
the
standards
working
group
I
would
expect
like
to
come
and
kind
of
participate
in
that
discussion.
But
anyway,
that
is
the
that's
the
issue
to
hold
the
space
for
for
us
the
summit,
if
you're
going
to
be
there,
please
go
edit
that
issue.
A
If
you
can
or
tell
me
to
edit
the
issue,
so
I
can
add
you
to
it
as
a
facilitator
or
session
attendee,
and
then
yeah
we'll
just
kind
of
refine
this
a
little
bit
over
the
next
a
couple
weeks
and
and
hopefully
have
a
good
conversation
with
our
colleagues
in
in
Vancouver.
So
this
this
is,
oh
I
just
spit
my
phone.
That's
that
any
feedback
on
this
right
now
or
thoughts
on
what
could
be
making
that
more
helpful.
E
You
just
might
want
to
check
with
James
to
see
if
he's
going
to
be
presenting
a
winter
CG
as
well,
and
you
want
to
roll
it
into
the
same
hour.
Perhaps
so
you
have
that
overlap.
Oh.
A
A
Okay,
cool
good
idea,
all
right.
Any
other
comment
on
that
issue
to
a
five
open:
JS
participation,
nope,
okay,
cool
and
then
that
brings
us
to
an
oldie
but
a
goodie
issue.
173.
I.
Think
last
time
I
said:
oh
I'll
definitely
have
some
update
and
I
am
sorry
to
report
that
I'm,
a
liar
I,
don't
have
an
update
for
you
all
on
173
today,
but
that
doesn't
mean
it's
not
very
important.
It
just
means
that
there's
other
pressing
things
happen.
A
So
I
have
the
update
for
us
on
173,
but
just
to
recap
on
this,
and
we
were
going
to
tease
out
a
couple
of
different
threads
related
to
basically
guidance
or
slash
documentation,
depending
on
whether
the
person
is.
You
know
a
particular
guidance
for
the
participant
and
then
also
some
clarification
for
the
say,
the
chair
groups
or
the
the
organizers
of
these
meetings
to
understand
what
our
folks
are
bringing
to
the
table.
A
So
there
was
like
kind
of
two
different
frames
for
this
that
we
wanted
to
to
clarify
so
yeah,
so
I'm,
just
gonna
write
no
update
there
so
and
then
that
takes
us
to
the
end
of
our
agenda.
For
today,
unless
there's
any
other
and
a
aob,
because
we
love
acronyms
any
other
business,
all
right,
cool,
great,
oh
and
I
guess
the
other
thing
that
happened.
Toby.
G
I
am
sorry:
I
was
planning
to
go
to
the
AC
meeting
in
nice,
because
niece
is
nice.
Sorry
for
the
terrible
pun.
There
also
I,
really
apologize
and
for
reasons
I
have
decided
not
to
renew
my
mem,
my
company's
membership
to
w3c
and
so
I
was
potentially
offering
to
go
and
represent
I
mean
on
behalf
of
openjs.
G
G
That's
the
proposal
ask
request
whatever
the
term
for
this
is,
and
in
particular,
because
they're
talking
about
having
I
mean
I,
opened
an
issue
a
while
back
to
have
a
chair
for
the
advisory
committee,
because
I
think
that
this
group
is
like
a
combination
of
like
inefficient
and
borderline
toxic.
G
Well,
it's
actually
a
very
important
group,
and
so
there's
a
whole
thread
on
this
topic
and
part
of
the
reason
I
would
go
would
be
to
run
a
bird
of
feather
session
on
discussing
what
that
would
actually
look
like,
and
so
you
know,
if
that's
something
that
is
also
that
feels
relevant,
which
I
think
it
should
then
yeah.
A
That
is
a
so,
as
you
know,
the
foundations
event
is
at
the
same
time
as
the
as
they
as
the
AC
meeting
and
so
like
I
will
be
at
Vancouver
instead
of
in
in
me.
So
I
think.
Let's
talk
about.
Let's
take
that
offline
and
and.
G
F
A
I,
just
I'm
just
so
happy
to
see
you
and
I
want
to
say,
welcome
back
and
I
know
that
you
have
been
I
know
why
you
were
very
busy.
So,
like
you
know,
no
no
judgment
here,
but
we're
thrilled
to
have
you
back
and
and
and
and
also
I
think
you
were
not
on
when
we
were
complimenting
the
wonderful
reports
that
you
always
provide
following
the
TC
meeting.
So
just
just
glad
to
have
you
back
thank.
F
A
All
right,
in
that
case,
I
think
we
can
call
today's
session
adjourned.
Let
me
double
check
when
our
next
meeting
is
next
meeting,
will
be
April
18th,
be
there,
so
that
you
can
help
us
figure
out
who
we
or
who,
what
collection
of
people
we
might
want
to
recommend
for
the
JS,
Landy,
Awards
and
so
that'll,
be
one
that
we
we
don't
do
live
on
a
live
stream,
but
but
we
still
would
love
to
have
everybody
dial
in
so
cool.
A
Well,
as
always,
it
brightens
my
day
to
see
you
all,
and
next
Tuesday
is
just
the
best.
So
I
hope
you
have
a
great
rest
of
your
day
and
yeah
poke
Us
in
slack.
If
you
think
of
anything
and
I'll
I'll
I'll
follow
up
online
and
on
GitHub
with
our
next.