►
From YouTube: APAC Hybrid Cloud Kopi Hour | Validated Patterns: Going Beyond Reference Architectures
Description
Validated patterns are used by architects and developers to bring together products across the Red Hat portfolio in a specific use case that is tested and maintained across the product lifecycle. They are continuously tested, GitOps-driven, open source, repeatable, cross-vertical solutions that embrace cloud-native applications strategies while remaining intelligent business-centric solutions.
But how exactly is this done? How is a Validated Pattern created, used, and maintained? Come join us for the next APAC Hybrid Cloud Kopi Hour where we will sit down with Red Hat Senior Software Engineering Manager Andrew Beekhof and explore the world of Red Hat’s Validated Patterns!
A
A
A
Hybrid
Cloud
copy
hour,
yep
we're
back.
It's
been
a
little
while
since
we've
been
online,
but
that's
fine,
so
we're
here
now
and
excited
to
have
a
brand
new
guest
and
a
new
show,
but
first
up
a
quick
reminder.
What
we're
talking
about
when
we
say
Kopi
Kopi
is
a
beverage
that's
very
common
in
in
Asia
and
Southeast,
Asia
and
Singapore.
So
just
so,
there's
no
confusion.
We
always
do
that.
A
As
a
reminder,
my
name
is
August
simonelli
I'm,
a
technical
marketing
manager
here
at
Red
Hat
based
in
Sydney
in
Australia
and
as
always
I'm
joined
by
my
favorite
co-host
Dev
shanbach
Dev.
How
are
you
today.
B
I'm
very
August,
thanks
for
asking
I'm,
really
interested
to
hear
what
Andrew
has
to
share
today,
working
with
our
customers
in
the
region,
specifically
focusing
on
Consulting.
We
take
a
lot
of
what
reference
architectures,
provide
us
and
then
work
with
our
customers
discuss
what
their
specific
needs
are,
and
then
you
know
craft
something
that
they
want
and
speaking
with
Andrew,
there
are
certain
things
that
you
know
specific
and
you
know
certain
prescriptive
things
that
we
can
use
the
validated
patterns
so
really
interested
you
here.
A
C
I'm
Andrew
breakoff
I'm,
a
senior
engineering
manager
in
the
ecosystem
engineering
team
under
each
month,
and
we
I
work
on
validated
patterns
too
I'm
based
in
Melbourne.
The
team
is
mostly
in
the
US
in
Amir,
but
I
I,
look
after
them
from
here
nice.
A
All
right,
so
the
topic
today
is
I.
Think
what
do
we
call
it
validated
sorry
validated
patterns
going
Beyond
reference
architecture
so
where
I
actually
want
to
start
with
this
before
we
jump
straight
into
validated
patterns,
is
what
we're
actually
going
beyond
the
reference
architectures.
So
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
Andrew
a
little
story.
A
little
history
of
mine
back
in
the
day,
I
was
back
when
I
started
Red
Hat.
A
Over
10
years
ago,
I
was
sent
to
a
large
Australian
customer
to
install
openstack,
so
a
10
years
in
openstack.
So
you
know
what
that
meant.
It
was
utter.
Chaos
and
I
had
nothing
to
go
by.
So
I
was
given
a
reference
architecture
by
I.
Think
some
engineering
team
and
we
struggled
through
it
and
we
got
there
and
it
came
together
and
so
I
was
sort
of
introduced
to
the
power
of
reference
architectures.
It's
not
this
one,
but
it
was
one
where
we
did
some
crazy
stuff.
A
We
were,
we
were
even
using
a
thing
called
packstack
for
those
of
you
who
know
openstack.
You
might
remember
it.
It
was
very
early
on,
as
things
evolved
and
and
the
industry
got
more
intelligent
or
smart
or
whatever
you
want
to
say.
You
know,
reference
architecture
has
evolved.
I
even
remember
my
first
experience
with
the
red
hat
team,
who
would
write
these
reference?
Architectures
I
think
it
was
at
I'd,
have
been
a
red
hat
Summit
in
2012
before
I
even
joined
red
hat,
and
they
were
a
great
group.
A
So
eventually,
I
knew
one
day
I'd
get
to
write
my
very
own
reference
architecture,
which
we're
probably
going
to
rubbish
the
heck
out
of
today,
but
I
I,
don't
know
so.
I
wound
up
writing
this.
What
I
I
did
openshift
on
openstack
and
we
wrote
a
very
traditional
reference
architecture.
So
I
worked,
you
know
quite
closely
with
the
engineering
team
and
the
marketing
team
and
the
product
teams,
and
we
came
up
with
this.
This
document
right
so
and
went
through
all
the
details.
A
We
explained
the
use
cases
and
and
why
we
needed
a
reference
architecture
and
we
had
a
great
diagram.
We
set
out
this
thing
in
stone
of
of
how
reference
architectures
and
how
a
customer
should
deploy
these
very,
very
complicated
Solutions,
and
that
was
my
world
of
reference
architectures
and
and
to
me
that
still
exists.
So
the
question
becomes-
and
you
know
this
is
a
reference
architecture.
What,
then,
is
a
validated
pattern?
A
How
are
we
moving
beyond
that
and
and
before
we
throw
it
to
Andrew
I'm
curious
Dev,
you
know
you're
working
with
customers
every
day.
Are
they
seeing
documents
like
this
exceptional
reference
architecture
that
I
wrote
two
years
ago
and,
and
you
know
how
are
they
exploring
the
space
and
then
we
we
go
to
Andrew
I'll.
Take
this
off
the
screen,
but
yeah
so
I.
B
Think
I
do
remember
going
through
this
particular
reference
architecture
that
you
showed
August.
It
was
a
good
starting
point
and
I
think
our
customers
really
liked
it
because
you
know,
like
you
said
you
know,
openstack
and
openshift
on
openstack.
At
the
time
there
was
very
little
out
there
to
look
out
for
in
terms
of
hey.
B
Where
do
we
really
start
right
and
now
fast
forward
today,
there's
so
much
out
there,
where
you
know
guys
really
a
lot
of
knowledge
out
there,
but
you
know
in
terms
of
wisdom,
you
know
they
try
to
bring
in
specialists
in
terms
of
okay.
Take
this
and
make
this
make
it
into
something
that
is
usable,
I,
think
our
customers
find
Value
in
different
approaches,
but
they
want
something
specific
as
well.
B
So
that's
what
a
lot
of
customers
ask
as
well
in
terms
of
okay,
we've
seen
this,
but
what
do
you
think
about
this
particular
problem?
How
is
this
solved
so
these?
The
questions
today
that
we
come
up
with
are
very
specific
from
our
benefits.
A
A
C
So
I
mean
reference.
Architectures
are
great
tool,
I've
been
popular
for
many
years
for
for
a
good
reason.
You
know
they're
good
at
sparking
an
initial
interest
from
a
customer
and
demonstrating
sort
of
the
institutional
knowledge.
We
understand
this
problem
space,
look
at
the
building
blocks
that
we
use
and
we
we
ship
all
these
or
we
know
where
to
get
all
these
and
we
know
how
to
combine
yeah
to
solve
your
problem,
but
at
the
point
you've
got
the
customer
convinced
then
what,
as
you
said,
there's
no
code.
C
So
turning
if
you're
already
familiar
with
the
code,
you
can
look
at
the
diagram
and
go
yeah
yeah.
You
know,
I
know
that
if
you're
starting
fresh,
that's
a
huge
mountain
to
climb
to
turn
those
slides
into
something
that
you
can
actually
feel
and
touch,
it's
it's
the
gap
between
theory
of
practice
and
when
that
happens
you
know
say:
you've
got
a
group
of
people
that
are
going
to
put
together
a
proof
of
concept.
Meanwhile
your
sales
process
is
losing
momentum,
so
we
need
something
more
and
so
validated
patterns.
C
Reference
architectures
grounded
in
customer
needs
so
they're,
not
speculative,
that
you
can
actually
install
and
you
can
count
on
to
install
they
installed
yesterday,
they're
installing
today
and
they'll
install
tomorrow
as
well.
So
that's
that's
like
the
first
level.
You
know
that's
the
little
introduction.
C
Where
do
you
want
me
to
go
from
there?
Yeah.
C
A
Grounded
in
customer
needs
right
and
that's
a
really
good
point,
because
you
know
we
wrote
the
shift
on
stack
reference
architecture
because
we
made
assumptions
and
yes,
there
was
absolutely
demand,
but
how?
How
do
you
get
a
little
bit
more
into
understanding?
Those
customer
needs.
I
mean
where,
where
are
you
who
you
in
sync,
with
to
sort
of
bring
that
stuff
out.
C
So
one
of
the,
where
are
you
sick,
with
a
lot
of
different
groups?
One
of
the
one
group
is
the
chief
architects
who
are
talking
to
and
the
field
generally
who
are
talking
to
customers
every
day.
You
know
sending
back
look.
This
is
what
we
did
so
we're
trying
not
to
do.
We
try
not
to
invent
things
around
because
we're
not
the
SMS.
You
know
you
guys
are
the
SMS.
So
what
has
already
been
done
at
a
customer
site
that
is
sort
of
our
that's
our
starting
point?
C
B
Is
there
any
particular
criteria,
or
you
know,
methodology
that
you
use
I
know
I
mean
with
Cloud
native
there's
a
documented
app
methodology,
but
in
creating
a
validated
pattern?
Is
there
something
that
you
follow.
C
So
all
the
patterns
have
got
the
same
technical
underpinnings,
so
we're
very
I
think
the
arrival
of
devops
and
good
Ops
you
know
came
at
a
good
time
for
this
idea,
or
this
idea
came
at
a
good
time
for
that,
so
we're
all
in
on
githubs
and
what
we
try
and
do
is
we
have
the
smallest.
We
identified
the
smallest
possible
seed,
which
is
give
us
an
open
shift.
C
Cluster
can
be
completely
blank
and
then
we'll
put
a
bunch
of
good
Ops
on
it
and
a
single
application
and
from
there,
and
that
application
will
obviously
point
to
a
good
repo
and
from
there
everything
else,
installs
automatically.
So
it's
sort
of
single
click.
Installation
yeah,
is
that
answer.
The
question.
A
A
C
All
of
the
above
yeah
we
definitely
have
Engineers
and
we
have.
We
have
QA
people
so
by
automating.
This
and
sort
of
sticking
to
that
kind
of
declarative
model
we've
made
it
really
reliable
to
deploy
and,
at
the
point
you've
got
something
that
you
can
reliably
deploy.
Then
you
can
start
ciing
it.
You
can
put
it
in
CI
and
you
can
run
tests
against
it,
and
so
our
one
of
our
patterns,
the
first
of
our
patterns,
was
industrial
Edge
and
we've
kept
that
going
through
four
eight
nine
ten,
eleven
twelve
and
thirteen.
C
Now
so
I've
kept
it
going
across
six
different
openshift
releases.
You
know
and
when
a
new
release
comes
out,
we
we
test
it
and
we
see
what
breaks
and
we
go
all
right
that
you
know
that
API
changed
from
V1
Alpha
One
to
V1,
Alpha,
2
or
V1
beta
2,
and
you
know
we
have
to
have
to
tweak
it
occasionally
to
keep
it
going,
but
yeah
we
can
yeah.
The
automation
allows
us
to
to
keep
things
going
along
right.
A
So
that
that
that
was
cool
there
right,
it
took
me
a
minute.
You
said
you
know
four
or
five,
six
and
I'm
thinking.
What
are
you
talking
about
so
you're,
literally
tracking
openshift
releases,
with
these
reference
architectures
at
a
what
is
it
a
minor
level
right,
you're,
not
obviously
changing
for
every
Zed
stream,
but
you
are
actually
you're
keeping.
C
Oh,
no,
we
we
see
I,
we
run
CI
on
each
pattern
at
least
once
a
week
what's
week,
per
Arc
per
platform
that
it's
running
on,
so
we're
testing
on
AWS,
gcp
and
Azure
at
the
moment
and
so
we'll
test
every
one
of
those
combinations
every
week
against
whatever
the
latest.
You
know,
4.13
openshift
releases
so
we'll
see
if
things
are
breaking
and
we'll
we'll
get
the
latest
versions
of
The
Operators
and
we'll
see.
If
you
know,
if
there's
any
backwards,
compatibility
issues
of
crafting
and
well,
we've
found
a
couple.
C
We
found
them
live
during
training
as
well.
So
no
that's
always
fun
right.
A
So
customers
who
are
using
these
I
mean
they're
they're,
getting
I,
don't
mean
to
say
this
for
free,
but
they're
they're,
getting
like
updates
I
mean
my
reference.
Architecture
was
wonderful,
really
was,
but
you
know
I
couldn't
update
it
every
every
week
and
you
know
if
you
looked
when
I
showed
it,
it
was
very
much
pegged
into
a
certain
version
of
openshift
and
now
we're
working
to
update
it
coming
soon,
but
at
the
same
time
yeah
so
you're
you're,
really
just
you're
able
to
crank
through
that.
Are
you?
A
C
Usually
bigger
than
two
that
we're
not
getting
a
lot
of
feedback
from
customers
like
that
dude
yeah,
because
we're
running
we're
running
CR,
constantly
we're
hitting
it
I
think
there
was
a
there
was
a
openshift
get
UPS
change
that
had
some
adverse
implications
for
us
and
we
found
it
like
within
an
hour.
Actually.
No,
there
wasn't
no
particular
option.
That's
dumping
on
that
team
unnecessarily
there
was.
There
was
a
a
release
process
outage
which
affected
everyone.
We
spotted
it
and
we
pinpointed
it
and
got
people
on
it
like
within
an
hour
right.
A
So
so
this
is
a
great
case
of
kind
of
like
security
right
I,
don't
want
to
see
it
I
I
I!
You
know
when
you
talk
about.
You
know
proactive
patching
and
being
aware
of
things,
and
this
is
an
opportunity
where
not
hearing
from
customers
means
that
you're
you're
helping
you're
beating
the
problem
I
think
that's
really
cool
yeah.
C
So
we
really
try
and
advocate
for
the
we
try
and
put
ourselves
in
the
customers
shoes
so
like
okay,
would
it
would
this
change
affect
a
customer?
Yes,
then
we
need
to
do
deal
with
it
too.
We
need
and
we
need
to
feedback
to
the
product
teams
that
this
change,
whatever
the
intention
was.
It
would
have
broken
customer
scenarios
like
this,
so
we're.
B
Are
they
in
particular,
favorite
or
you
know,
commonly
used
validated
patterns?
You
mentioned
Industrial
Age,
but
I
mean
I'm
just
curious
to
know.
Okay,
this
is
you
know.
One
of
the
validated
patterns
that's
used
often,
and
the
other
question
I
had
was.
What
is
the
next
validated
pattern
that
you
are
really
excited
about,
which.
C
Okay,
so
patterns
that
are
used,
the
most
common
there's,
probably
two
different
answers.
There,
multiplayer
good
Ops,
is
probably
the
most
used
of
all
the
patterns,
because
it's
the
base
of
everything
it's
it's
patent,
light
validated
pattern
light.
It's
the
minimum,
minimal
viable
pattern.
It's
got.
It's
got
the
the
framework
and,
like
the
tiniest
demo,
that
we
can
stick
on
top.
So
in
terms
of
when
you're
trying
to
build
on
top
there's
the
list
amount
that
you
need
to
get
rid
of
before
you
start
building.
C
Yeah,
so
industrial
edges
was
the
first
pattern
and
that's
all
singing
or
dancing.
That
is
huge.
It's
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
for
people
and
yet
still
the
same
single
click,
kind
of
installation
process,
so
they've
all
got
the
same
same
installation
process
once
you
know
how
to
work
with
one
pattern.
C
You
know
how
to
work
with
all
of
them,
but
the
one
that's
probably
getting
the
most
traction
and
use
at
the
moment
is
that
our
devsecops
pattern
that
that's
security-
it's
it's
very
popular
at
the
moment,
so
yeah
so
there's
there's
some
things
around
that
were
announced
at
Summit
that
it
dovetails
in
with
nicely
gives
people
something
they
can
play
with.
On-Prem.
B
C
This
is
a
bit
of
a
left
field
one,
but
this
is
actually
something
one
of
our
Engineers
is
working
on.
It's
an
ansible
only
gearbox
pattern.
So
all
our
patterns
to
date
have
been
around
openshift,
but
you
know
technically
technically.
I
need
the
underpinning
of
good
Ops
on
openshift
is
rscd.
Yes,
that's
a
pretty
common
piece.
You
don't
strictly
need
Argo
CD
to
do
good.
C
Ops,
though
you
can
do
good
Ops
with
pretty
much
any
sort
of
rules
engine,
and
that
includes
ansible
Tower,
so
we're
working
on
a
pattern
and
a
pattern
framework
that
extends
that
kind
of
get
Ops
approach
to
non
container
platform,
both
systems.
So
if
even
if
you're
just
doing
well,
you
can
still
bring
that
sort
of
get
Ops
approach
to
it.
So
that's
that's
one
that
I'm
pretty
excited
about
see
where
that
goes.
A
C
So
hopefully,
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
we'll
have
something
to
say
there
at
least
like
a
an
MVP
version
and
then
we'll
be
extending
that
next
quarter.
A
Right
so,
and
that
that
makes
me
wonder
and
something
I
did
want
to
ask
is
so
how
do
you
decide
which
patterns
I
mean
like?
Is
there
a
lot
of
pattern
choices
or
is
it
kind
of
like
you
know?
What
do
we
do,
or
you
know
how?
How
is
that
being
handled
like,
what's
that,
like
in
your
team,
when
you
guys
sit
down
and
go
okay,
there's
five
of
us
or
10
or
20
I,
don't
know.
But
what
do
we
focus
on?
Where
are
you?
Where
are
you?
How
are
you
doing
that.
C
So
you
specifically
mean
way
to
waste.
How
do
we
decide
what
to
work
on
not
how
does
someone
else
yeah
decide
what.
A
C
So
I'm
gonna
evade
first
we've
actually
spent
quite
a
significant
amount
of
time
this
year
doing,
enabling
so
that
we
are
not
the
only
people
that
know
how
to
make
patterns
because
yeah
we're
Five
Guys.
C
You
know
we
can't
do
everything,
there's
more
more
ideas
out
there
than
than
we
can
do,
and
so
the
more
people
that
are
able
to
do
it,
the
better
so
yeah,
and
that
that
allows
us
to
be
a
bit
more
strategic,
a
bit
more
picky
about
what
we
what
we
get
involved
with,
because
it's
no
longer
about.
Why
should
this
be
a
pattern
we
could
say
yeah.
This
is
a
great
idea
for
a
pattern,
but
the
question
is
now:
why?
Why
is
it
us
creating
a
pattern?
C
How
about
you
create
the
pattern
so
that
that's
like
a
first
level
of
Defense,
but
but
once
it's
crossed
that
threshold?
This
is
this
is
potentially
something
we
need
to
be
involved
in.
It's
it's
a
multi-dimensional
prioritization
process.
So
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
go
into
it.
I
mean
the
first
criteria
is:
are
there
multiple
Red
Hat
products
involved?
We
work
for
Red
Hat.
You
know
it's.
This
is,
this
is
just
part
of
the
territory
for
that,
so
we
definitely
look
for
multiple
products.
C
We
don't
want
single
his
product
teams,
doing
demos
and
putting
putting
the
demos
together.
We
don't
need
to
go
there,
so
we
concentrate
on
multi-product
Solutions
and
then
we
look
at
how
applicable
that
architecture
is
to
other
customers.
So
the
customers
are
the
verticals
other
patterns.
Is
this
something
that
we
can
do?
Can
we
use
this
work
as
an
excuse
to
write
this
thing
that
we
can
actually
make
use
of
in
other
patterns
as
well?
So
these
are.
C
These
are
some
of
the
considerations
that
to
get
looked
at,
how
similar
is
it
to
an
existing
patent?
C
You
know
we'd
rather
spend
the
time
doing
something
that
opens
up
a
whole
new
sort
of
set
of
use
cases
for
people.
Then
you
know
minor
variations
on
existing
ones.
We
look
at
demand
and
opportunity.
Is
there
a
time-based
opportunity
that
we
can
that
we
can
get
involved
with
a
sales
motion
or
a
customer
engagement
that
would
really
amplifi
we'd
be
amplifying
them
and
they'd
be
amplifying
us?
So
a
lot
of
these
factors
go
into
it.
C
Yeah
yeah,
so
it's
it's
a
bit.
It's
a
process.
A
It's
a
process,
but-
and
so
this
is
an
important
point-
is
these
patterns
aren't
Red
Hat
products
right
I
mean
they
use
red
hat
products,
but
they're
not
an
owned
by
Red,
Hat
kind
of
thing,
which
is
why
I
wanted
to
look
at
the
actual
the
hybrid
Cloud,
the
the
website?
Right,
because
we
were
talking
about
this.
Obviously,
as
we
were
preparing
for
the
show
and
as
I
was
looking
at
the
site,
I
mean
you
guys.
This
is
sort
of
the
I.
Don't
know
what
you
call
this.
A
The
Upstream
version
of
the
site
I
mean
this
is
this:
is
the
available
site
I
noticed
across
them
that
when
I
make
my
choice
when
I'm
looking
at
my
patterns,
I
can
do
like
different
types
of
validated
by
Red
Hat,
a
community
pattern
I'm
looking
at
Industries
I'm
looking
at
products?
Can
you
talk
to
us
a
bit
about
this?
This
section
here
where
I'm
looking
at
these
validated
patterns
and
Community
patterns
that
are
are
showing
up
on
this
site
and
what
that
means
around.
You
know
devast
SLA,
around
support
around
that
kind
of
stuff.
A
A
bit
more
about
I
mean
if
I'm
I'm,
seeing
Community
you've
mentioned
it
a
bit,
but
I
can
get
involved
in
this
right.
I
mean
absolutely
these
things
right
absolutely.
What
is
that
about?
Like
yeah.
C
So
yeah
I
mean
there's
more
things
that
we
can
than
we
can.
We
can
do.
We
want
people
to
be
able
to
write
their
own
patterns
and
and
we're
happy
to.
We
want
to
help
promote
your
work.
Where
do
I
go
from
here?
It's
every
validated
pattern
represents
a
commitment
for
ongoing
testing
and
Bug
fixes
and
triage.
C
So
there's
there's
like
a
there's,
a
finite
pool
of
patterns
that
we
can
do
that
we
can
that
we
can
maintain,
but
that
shouldn't
limit
the
number
of
patterns
that
can
exist
and
so
for
everything
else.
We
give
them
a
community
designation
and
we
and
we
try
and
make
it
really
easy
for
patterns
or
for
people
to
create
Community
patterns,
and
we
do
that
by
basically
lowering
the
threshold.
You
know
we
have.
You
know
when
we
do
a
valid
pattern.
It
is
the
test
plans.
C
There
needs
to
be
presentation,
presentations,
there
needs
to
be
recorded
demos.
You
know
scripts
for,
like
once,
you've
deployed
it.
This
is
what
this
is,
how
you
show
it
off
at
this
level
at
the
community
level,
it's
more
about
like
hey
I've,
done
something
and
we
think
it's
really
cool
and
with,
and
it
uses
the
same
technical
underpinnings
so
we'd
like
to
you
know
would
like
to
make.
We
would
like
to
make
it
available
to
other
people.
C
C
There
are
some
implementation
requirements,
but
they
are
quite
low.
It's
pretty
much
don't
go
hard
at
hard
coding
secrets
and
things
about
your
environment,
and
you
know
you
use
the
products
in
the
ways
that
they're
intended,
but
once
you,
you
know
cross
that
you
know
like
a
database
is
not
a
messaging
Riot.
Let's
not
go
there,
but
as
long
as
you're
using
doing
things
you
know
pretty
reasonably,
it
can
be
a
community
pattern
once
you've
got
a
community
pattern
and
you
think
this
look.
C
This
is
so
great
and
everyone
around
you
saying
Hey
I
want
this.
I
want
this.
You
know
this.
This
is
something
that
should
get
the
validated
treatment.
We've
got
we're
trying
to
do
this
as
an
open
process,
so
we've
got
hybrid
Cloud
patterns
at
googlegroups.com.
C
So
it's
it's
linked
on
the
site
somewhere,
probably
under
contact,
and
you
can
say,
hey,
there's
this
pattern
and
we
think
you
know
it's
it's
worthy
of,
though,
that
you
know
that
that
ongoing
investment
of
validation
and
and
yeah-
and
so
that's
where
we'll
have
a
transparent
conversation
about
you,
know
pros
and
cons
and
but
yeah
anyone.
Anyone
could
create
a
partner.
Anyone
could
submit
a
pattern
for
validation,
we've
had
essays,
we've
had
Consultants,
we've
had
Partners,
have
taken
patents
and
and
improve
them.
C
They've
created
their
own
new
ones,
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
should
say
names
but
yeah,
it's
it's
definitely
an
open
process
and
we
want
your
best
ideas.
A
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
again,
I
mean
I'm,
just
I'm,
looking
at
the
different
topics
on
here
that
I
have
on
this
on
this
page,
and
they
you
know
between
the
validate
and
the
community,
they're
just
they're,
so
varied
I
mean
the
connected
vehicle
and
and
when
you
dig
into
it
you
know
it's
it's
opening
up
straight
to
GitHub.
It's
it's
fascinating
like
it's
just
it's
so
Dynamic!
A
You
know,
speaking
of
back
to
my
shift
on
stack
architecture
which
is
literally
a
PDF.
This
is
so
exciting
to
me:
I'm,
not
a
consultant
anymore,
but
when
I
was
and
same
for
you
Dev,
you
know
when
we
were
down
in
the
trenches
to
have
this
kind
of
toolkit
and
the
support
of
knowing
that
and
I'll
go
back
to
it.
The
the
testing
that
was
being
done
like
when
I
looked
at
one
of
these
look
at
this
you're
showing
the
different
versions,
things
are
being
validated
on,
am
I.
C
C
Yeah,
that's
how
we
avoid
you
know
unintentionally,
assuming
things
about
the
AWS
platform
that
don't
hold
on
other
platforms.
So
we
just
test
multiple
platforms
and
that's
how
we
find
those
things
and
you
if
you
click
on
status,
you'll
see
like
the
whole.
This
is
our
live,
CI
dashboard
up
next
to
the
search
bar
yeah.
So
this
is
every.
C
And
and
as
you,
you
kind
of
your
glanced
off
it,
but
yeah
like
all
the
code.
This
is
this:
is
all
public
code
there's
nothing
hidden
here.
It's
all.
You
know
yeah
everything's
out
there
for
everyone
to
see
and
you
can
take
it
and
use
it
and
that
doesn't
cost
you
anything
and
you
can
improve
it
and
if
you
know,
if
you'd
like
we'd
love
it,
if
you
send
any
of
the
improvements
back,
which
you
know
some
people,
do
you
don't
have
to
okay,
so
yeah.
A
Yeah,
but
knowing
that
this
is
getting
out
in
the
world
whether
it
comes
back
and-
and
we
you
know
like
you
said-
we
hope
it
does,
because
it
opens
up
discussion
and
it
makes
just
everyone
better
and
it
makes
these
platforms
better
so
that
consumers
and
our
customers
are
in
safer,
more
reliable
environments,
but
so
that's
cool,
but
like
I
love
the
the
testing
across
the
different
platforms,
because
I
mean
openshift
is
so
portable,
it's
so
it's
so
multi-cloud.
So
these
things
need
to
work.
A
It's
there.
It's
the
logic,
the
thinking
the
documentation,
it's
it's,
it's
a
devops
reference
architecture.
It
really
is
yeah.
A
Right,
yeah
yeah,
it's
it's
terrific,
now,
I
know
that
you
guys
and
and
we're
you
have
a
YouTube
page
and
I'll
just
put
the
link
to
it
up
here.
But
you
know
tell
me
about
recording
demos.
Like
you
know,
as
the
team
is
the
team
enjoying
getting
that
kind
of
stuff
out
there,
I
never
had
to
do
that
for
a
reference
architecture.
You
know
I
kind
of
published
it
and
moved
on.
So
you
know
I.
C
Think,
there's
I
think
some
of
the
team
really
enjoys
it
and
some
of
the
team
really
doesn't,
and
you
know
it
goes,
It
goes
with
the
territory.
Look.
It.
C
It's
good
experience
and
it's
it's
just
a
really
powerful
way
to
demonstrate
some
of
this
stuff,
but
yeah
there's
a
bit
of
variety
there.
Some
people
will
just
record
the
the
screen
what's
happening
on
the
screen
and
some
people
get
involved
and
do
they
speak
overwritten
business.
B
C
And
and
saying
how
little
work
you
do
and
then
the
end
result
like
they
are
the
sprawl
of
agar
objects.
You
know,
particularly
if
you're
talking
over
the
top
of
it,
while
it's
going
in
the
background,
and-
and
you
know
it's
amazing
where
automation
can
get
you
and
how
you
know
these
are
really.
These
are
mult.
Some
of
these
patterns
are
multi-cluster
solutions
and
the
pattern
just
rolls
it
all
out.
B
You
did
just
to
be
honest,
so
you
do
talk
about
validated
patterns
by
Red,
Hat
I
just
had
this
question.
Do
I
mean
customers
using
subscriptions
as
customers?
You
know,
can
they
call
support
if,
if
they
needed
support
I
know,
you
know
we
go
through
the
whole,
rigorous
validation
testing.
You
know
performance
scale
all
that.
But
what,
if
you
know
customer
had
you
know
some
problem
or
some
questions?
Are
they
able
to
call
support
and
say?
Oh
you
know
this
validated
pattern.
I
need
help.
C
Yeah,
so
that's
a
really
good
question
today.
Right
now
you
cannot
call
up
and
ask,
for
you
know
industrial
Edge
support.
You
can
call
up
and
say:
I've
got
a
an
anq
streams
problem.
I've
got
an
open
ship,
get
UPS
problem.
I've
got
enough
ship
pipelines
from
I've
got
an
open
ship
problem.
You
can
call
up
and
say
all
those
things
you
can
call
I
forget
who
public
is
it?
C
You
can
come
up
and
say:
I've
got
a
seldom
problem
to
the
partner
that
chip
seldom
I
can't
remember
who
that
is
but
yeah.
You
cannot
call
up
and
say:
I've
got
an
industrial
Edge
problem.
I've
got
a
medical
diagnosis
problem.
Maybe
we'll
have
something
else,
something
to
say
about
that
in
the
future,
but
yeah.
No,
no
plans,
no
public
plans
about
that.
Yet.
A
B
A
C
C
I
like
to
have
like
a
glass
half
full
kind
of
approach
to
it.
You
know
some
people
go.
Oh,
it's
still
supported
so
I
can't
use
it,
but
the
reality
is
yeah
you're,
not
alone
you're,
not
alone,
there's
a
group
of
other
people
that
are
using
this
every
day
and
they're
a
motivated
team
of
people
that
they
want
to
find
and
fix
problems.
If
you
find
a
problem,
they
are
intrinsically
motivated
to
fix
that
problem.
C
A
Yeah
I
mean,
and
that's
that's
their
that's
the
open
source
model
right.
You
know
the
they're
saying
it
would
be
like
saying
an
upstream
Community
doesn't
support
us.
Of
course
it
does
it's.
It's
a
you
know
and
again
I'll
put
this
back
up
because
I
think
if,
if
you're
out
there
and
you're
looking
to
interact
even
even
how
you've
set
this
up
through
Google
Groups,
you
know
it
makes
it
clear:
you're
not
you're,
not
throwing
out
your
you're,
not
risking
your
IP
or
giving
it
to
some
corporate
whoever.
A
You
know
it's
very
much
a
team
and
a
community
and
I
guess
I'll
admit
you
know.
I
I
came
I
first
heard
about
these
ages
ago
at
Red
Hat,
and
we
were
talking
about
that.
We
had
just
finished
this
reference
architecture
and
they
were
talking
about
evolving
them
and
I'm
thinking.
What
does
this
mean
and
to
have
seen
that
change
and
and
where
it's
gone
is,
is
just
it's
just
really
good.
It
really
fits.
You
know
what
we've
always
had.
You
know.
A
All
of
us
have
been
at
redhead
a
while,
but
have
always
been
used
to,
but
to
see
it
kind
of
almost
come
to
an
area.
I
didn't
expect
it
to
be
possible
to
come
to
as
need
I'm
curious.
If
you
have
a
shout
out
to
some
of
the
people
who
kind
of
you
know
brought
that
here,
because
these
are
some
people.
I
know
I've
worked
with
in
the
past,
but
you
know
where,
like?
Where
did
this
come
from?
You
know
in
the
Deep
there
are
dark
days
so
to
speak.
C
I
think
probably
the
Genesis
was
probably
Nick
Bassett
and
William
Henry
William
Henry
was
in
the
portfolio
architecture
team
at
the
time.
Hence
you
know
we
try
and
work
closely
with
them,
but
it's
really
their
brainchild
and
I
like
to
think
I
brought
a
little
bit
of
a
bit
of
technical
expertise
to
it
as
well.
As
you
know,
I'm
a
manager
now
but
I
did
have
a
technical
background
and
I
spent
a
lot
of
time.
C
Building
up
the
the
relha
Community,
so
clustering,
so
I
I
brought
some
of
that
mindset
of
community
building
to
this
as
well
and
I.
Think
that
I
think
that's
some
of
that.
Some
of
that's
like
licked
out
as
well
in
a
good
way.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
think
so
too,
because
when
I
mean
yeah
the
portfolio,
it's
the
portfolio,
architecture,
team
and
I
think
that's
really
important
because
I
know
working
with
them
in
the
past
yeah
the
fact
that
they
were
pulling
in
all
the
pieces
and
that
they're
now
in
lockstep
with
engineering
is
super
cool,
because
that
is
what
it
is.
Our
customers
are
doing
that
so
we're
doing
that.
It's
natural!
It
didn't
happen
one
because
of
the
other.
A
It's
just
a
natural
progression,
so
I
think
it's
it's
worked
out
really
well
and
I
I
mean
there
is
actually
a
formal,
Red,
Hat
page
for
validated
patterns.
So
it
there
is,
you
know,
there's
a
nicely
branded
page
I
think
there's
even
a
Snappy
little
marketing,
video
on
there
yeah
yeah
animation
and
everything.
Oh
yeah.
A
A
You
know,
I
feel
like
I
could
be
part
of
something
like
this
and,
and
you
know,
I'm
in
the
marketing
side
of
the
house
and
I
say
that
with
a
bit
of
a
joke
because
I
feel
like
I,
do
know
a
bit
more,
but
so
I
like
that,
and
you
know
I
again,
I
think
it's
important
that
especially
our
field
teams
and
customers
who
see
this
realize
that
these
things
are
out.
There
have
a
read,
check
them
out
and
understand
the
community.
C
Hopefully,
these
allow
you
to
spend
more
time
on
higher
value
tasks,
not
just
deploying
a
few
operators,
and
you
know,
don't
spend
your
time
getting.
Openshift
installed,
spend
your
time
like
showing
the
power
of
openshift
to
the
customer
yeah.
So
we
try,
we
don't
try
and
be
everything
we
try
to
give
you
like
80
of
the
start
of
the
of
the
solution,
and
then
you
know
every
pattern:
it's
not
something
you're
going
to
take
to
production,
unmodified
you're
going
to
have
to
tailor
it
to
whatever
the
customer's
needs
are,
but
hopefully
yeah
we've.
C
Given
you
that
starting
point
and
just
back
to
your
ease
of
use,
Point
like
we
really
do
fight
against
entropy,
you
know
everything
would
do.
Software
is
a
constant
fight
to
like.
Are
we
making
this
too
complex?
You
know,
as
you
add,
more
power
and
flexibility,
it's
very
easy
for
complexity
to
to
creep
in,
and
so
we're
constantly
fighting
against
that
and
trying
to
make
sure
we,
you
know
the
powerful
the
hard
things
are
possible,
but
the
easy
things
are
easy.
C
A
Thanks
for
having
me,
oh
yeah,
no
I,
it's
it's
appreciated
and
it's
a
it's
a
fun
format.
We
have
here
and
it's
worked
out
pretty
well
so
I
I
hope
your
team
jumped
on
I
hope
you
are
mocked
brutally
when
your
next
team
meeting
comes
I,
don't
think
they
have
anything
to
mock
you
for,
but
I
really
hope
they
do,
because
that's
always
fun,
but
no
I
do
hope
that
that
they
had
a
chance
to
join.
A
We
did
have
one
person
in
the
chat
say
hello,
so
I
always
like
to
say
you
know,
let's
go
ahead
and
put
that
on
there
and
say
of
course,
action
greetings
hello
and
thank
you
for
joining
if
you're
still
out
there.
It's
it's
good
to
have
viewers
really
appreciate
that
so
anyway,
if
you
have
any
final
Last,
Words,
Andrew
I
think
you've
basically
covered
that
off
really
nicely,
but
please
go
ahead.
C
No
I
just
we,
we
welcome
everyone's
perspectives
and
ideas
and
yeah
there's
only
so
many
of
them
we
can
do,
but
we
certainly
want
to
help
you
if
you're
interested
in
creating
a
pattern.
We'd,
certainly
love
to
help.
You
do
so.
A
Well,
Dev:
here
we
are
again:
we've
got
some
exciting
shows
coming
up,
we're
in
planning
some
nice
ones,
so
some
stuff
on
ACM,
so
red
hat
Advanced
cluster
manager
for
kubernetes
and
some
other
areas
in
the
Telco
space.
A
I
had
a
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any
others
we
want
to
reveal
just
yet
there's
some
interesting
demos
and
Labs
coming
up
so
keep
an
eye
on
that
playlist
like
subscribe.
All
those
various
things,
but
one
thing
I
do
want
to
mention
is
next
week
we
have
our
first
ever
Japanese
language
stream,
so
we're
doing
the
the
hybrid
Cloud
copy.
Our
Japan
and
the
team
from
in
Japan
has
doing
a
really
neat
session
on
cloud
native.
It
is
in
Japanese.
A
So
if
you
don't
speak
the
language
you'll,
you
won't
be
able
to
follow,
but
it's
it's
really
great
because
we're
getting
these
voices
from
APAC
out
there,
so
I've
put
the
short
URL
to
their
brand
new
playlist,
that
is
at
1pm
Japanese
Standard
Time
next
Friday
July
7th,
so
I'm
I'm
really
excited
other
than
that
always
keep
an
eye
on
the
streaming
calendar
as
I
like
to
do
Dev.
If
you
have
any
final
words,
please,
you
know,
let
us
know,
what's
what's
on
for
the
weekend
or
just
say,
say
goodbye.
B
I
just
wanted
to
thank
Andrew
for
coming,
and
you
know
sharing
thoughts
on
validating
factors
really
appreciate.
It
really
excited
that
you
know
every
month
we're
coming
up
with
these
shows,
and
it's
out
there
really
interesting
topics.
B
Glad
to
be
part
of
this.
Thanks.
A
Heaps
of
fun
all
right
folks,
well,
thank
you,
everyone
for
joining
and
for
viewing
this
in
the
future.
Andrew
as
Dev
said.
Thank
you
for
your
time
today
and
your
passion
and
for
you
know,
being
such
a
great
advocate
of
Open
Source
and
making
this
happen,
and
just
for
coming
on.
The
show
I
mean
I've,
I've
heard
always
heard
wonderful
and
great
things
about
you
and
the
teams
and
in
previous
roles
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
being
here
and
spending
some
time
with
us
today.