►
Description
The OKD Working Group's purpose is to discuss, give guidance to, and enable collaboration on current development efforts for OKD, Kubernetes, and related CNCF projects. The OKD Working Group includes the discussion of shared community goals for OKD 4 and beyond. Additionally, the Working Group produces supporting materials and best practices for end-users and provides guidance and coordination for CNCF projects working within the SIG's scope.
https://okd.io
A
A
A
Well
then,
let's
jump
into
it,
no
update
on
the
charter,
yet
I
was
working
on
the
video
stuff,
so
I
haven't
taken
a
look
harder
stuff,
yet
beta
site,
brian.
B
Unfortunately,
no
real
progress,
also
diane
was
going
to
be
here
to
see
if
she
could
prod
we're
just
waiting
for
the
dns
entry.
Everything
else
has
been
done.
It's
all
been
migrated,
tidied
up
all
the
all
the
branches
and
switched
all
of
the
automation
onto
the
main
branch
renamed.
B
The
master
domain,
so
everything's
done
we're
just
waiting
for
the
the
switchover
of
dns
and
a
couple
of
other
things
that
have
happened,
though,
since
last
call,
we've
integrated
the
virtualization
working
group,
sandro
decided
to
remove
the
the
media
sort
of
ticker
and
they
still
have
the
links
there,
but
I
didn't
see
that
was
a
reason
not
to
integrate.
So
that's
now
been
integrated
and
sandra
also
helped
upgrade
the
automation,
so
it
now
does
a
build.
B
A
And
see
here,
moving
on
we'll
be
reworking,
the
install
on
the
readme
after
the
beta
site
goes
proud.
Inclusive
language
update
that'll
be
addressed
when
beta
site
goes
prod
on
hold
until
the
beta
psychos
pride
is
creating
a
build
doc
outline
for
the
dean,
because,
basically
that'll
be
sorting
through
several
documents.
All
at
once
upgrade
path.
Notifications.
C
A
C
I
guess
my
my
idea
is
that
it's
reasonable
if
the
people
that
are
implementing
it
are
reasonable
right.
You
know,
as
with
many
of
those
things,
some
of
the
terms
can
be
problematic
when
interpreted
by
problematic
people.
C
Accurate
yeah,
but
so
then
the
question
is:
do
we
do
we
need
to?
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
go
with
it.
The
way
it
is
it's
better
than
than
many
that
I've
seen.
A
Diane's
I
go
in
because
they've
done
it
before
that
way,
actually
on
a
couple.
Other
types
of
things
so,
like
the
the
charter,
is
actually
sort
of
a
lift
and
shift
with
a
few
modifications
from
I
think
cncf
stuff,
and
so
this
yeah
I
mean
she.
She
was
under
the
impression
that
it
would
be
fine,
and
she
knows
that
the
ansible
folks
ran
this
through
a
lawyer.
A
A
Yeah,
I
will
be
honest
that
I've
I've
actually
been
concerned
about
the
the
trend
towards
intent,
not
mattering.
C
A
A
B
B
As
you
travel
around
the
world,
what
one
culture
may
find
offensive
another
one
may
not,
but
I
mean
if
someone
comes
say
to
jamie
and
said,
look
I
don't
feel
comfortable
attending
these
meetings
anymore,
because
I'm
feeling
that
I'm
being
bullied
or
whatever,
then
this
gives
jamie
something
to
sort
of
point
at
and
say
to
whoever
was
being
not
not
knowingly
being
sort
of
bullying
just
sort
of
calm
it
down
just
think
of
other
people's
cultures,
but
as
as
with
all
these
things,
I
I
think
it
does
have
to
be
handled
with
common
sense.
B
C
I
would
be
happy
with
the
what
used
to
be
called
the
reasonable
man
standard.
I
guess
we
could
call
it
reasonable
person
standard.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that,
but
in
other
words,
what
is
offensive
is
what
would
be
offensive
to
a
reasonable
person.
C
A
So
I
guess
my
concern
is
that
if
someone
says
something
that's
offensive
to
someone
and
maybe
they
slip
up
and
do
it
again,
this
basically
says
you
have
the
right
to
to
kick
them
out
or
whatever,
but
it
there's
nothing
here
that
says
basic
that
lays
the
groundwork
for
a
mediation
between
two
people
who
are
having
conflict.
A
That's
that's.
The
only
concern
that
I
have
is
that
it's
basically
like
you're
in
or
you're
out
so,
and
maybe
that's
fine
for
people
but
I've.
I
I've
been
on
a
lot
of
different
boards
and
committees
and
stuff
like
that,
and
sometimes
conflict
is
a
little
bit
more,
but
it's
not
as
black
and
white.
As
someone
said,
something
that
everyone
agrees
is
offensive
and
they
stop,
and
you
know
I
mean
like
there's
often
when
it
happens.
There's
it's
a
little
more
nuanced,
but
you
know
I
like.
B
A
B
I
mean
I
I
again
reading
this,
I
would
say
if
a
participant
engages
in
harassing
behavior,
the
meeting
organizers
may
take
any
action
they
deem
appropriate.
So
I
think
we
do
have
a
general
get
out
clause
that
if
you
think
that
somebody
wasn't
intentionally
being
offensive,
it
may
just
be
their
general
language.
B
They
may
think
is
okay,
but
someone
else
may
not
think
okay,
it
allows
you
to
maybe
open
a
chat
message
and
say
that
that
may
not
have
been
the
best
choice
of
words
or
something,
and
you
can
resolve
it
like
that
or
it
may
be
that
you
think
well,
they
are
being
deliberately
provocative
and
being
deliberately
offensive,
and
then
you
may
want
to
give
them
an
official
warning,
stop
and
decease
otherwise,
you'll
be
ejected,
so
I
think
it
gives
it
gives
us
the
ability
to
apply
common
sense.
It's
not
saying
it's
an
automatic
you're
out.
B
B
D
A
It
is,
I
mean
so
we're
I
at
least
my
interpretation
and
when
diane-
and
I
talked
about
this-
and
when
we've
talked
about
this
at
other
meetings
like,
for
example,
the
cncf
they
actually
have
mentioned,
their
code
of
conduct
at
the
beginning
of
every
streaming
tv
show
that
they
do
and
they
say
that
this
is
considered.
This
streaming
tv
show
is
considered
an
event
of
the
cncf,
so
I
think
it's
sort
of
that
now.
A
I
just
noticed
at
the
bottom
that
actually
this,
even
though
it
was
apparently
run
through
a
lawyer,
its
creative
commons
attribution
and
was
pulled
from
the
codes
of
conduct
of
openstack,
puppet
labs,
ubuntu,
fedora
project
elastic,
etc.
So
it
looks
like
this
was
even
pilfered
from
other
people
right
so
yeah.
So
let's
create
comments.
So
we
can.
We
can
use
it,
modify
it
as
long
as
we
give
proper
notice.
B
D
A
D
C
Bruce
well,
I'd
say
I'll
go
along
with
it,
I'm
sort
of
a
even
though
I'm
sitting
in
canada.
I
am
a
strict
first
amendment
be
speecher.
So
now.
A
Are
you,
are
you
a
native
canuckistani
or
are
you
united,
I'm.
C
Yeah
and
actually
people
are
like
I've
been
to
courses
on
microaggressions,
which
is
sort
of
a
related
topic
and
asking
somebody
about
the
origins
is
a
you
know
typical
microaggression.
C
Offended
by
that,
if
I
were
so
inclined.
A
C
Or
if
I
were
gaming,
the
system
of
you
know
from
the
right
taking
offense
at
everything.
So
yeah.
No,
I
mean
the
it's
hard
to
get
into
most
of
those
things
while
staying
on
topic
with
our
subject
matter.
Fortunately,.
C
So
my
my
feeling
is,
it's
not
harmful,
and
you
know
that's
sort
of
also
my
feeling
on
the
inclusive
language.
You
know
if
it
doesn't
hurt
us.
Why
not
you
know
change
whatever
is
the
name
that
we
can't
say
anymore,
of
the
bran
of
the
main
branch
to
maine,
et
cetera.
Although
I've
noticed
that,
like
the
wildfly
people,
which
is
another
red
hat
project,
don't
seem
to
be
doing
that
at
all
looking
at
their
get
repositories.
So
it's
a
little
bit
inconsistent,
but
you
know
why
not.
C
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that,
so
I
guess
I'm.
Similarly
with
this
one,
it
probably
is
not
going
to
hurt
us,
so
I'm
happy
to
go
along
with
it.
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
encourage
it
so
your
hand
halfway
up,
I'm
not
going
to
vote
against
it.
Let's
see.
A
Okay,
well
I'll
tell
you
what
we'll
bring
this
to
the
main
group
at
the
next
meeting,
and
I
guess
what
we'll
do
is
michael.
Do
you
have
a
second
between
now
and
next
week,
where
you
could
lift
this
and
change
the
references
from
ansible
to
okd
and
any
other
context
changes.
A
C
Need
yeah
reported
misconduct
to
diane.
A
A
Diane
and
I
and
well
I
you
know,
I
my
sense-
is
that
with
stuff
like
this
wouldn't
be
used
a
lot,
but
we
probably
should
have
a
private
email
address
in
which
people
yeah.
A
D
A
Yeah
yeah,
it's
myself,
diane
and
vadim.
Actually
christian
is
no
longer
a
co-chair.
He's
just
a
you
know:
a
participating
member
okay!
Well,
I
will
find
out
if
we
have
resources
to
do
that
within
red
hats,
or
actually
we
can
ask
diane
to
find
out
because
well,
I
was
just
going
to
ask
the
dean
but
we'll
ask
diane,
because
she
has
all
the
communications
things
so
I'll.
A
Take
that
as
a
task
to
ask
diane
to
ask
around
to
see
if
red
hat
can
provide
an
email
address,
it
might
be
that
we
michael
did
you
have
something.
D
B
I
mean
we've
got
the
google
group,
we've
got
the
the
the
email
list,
so
I'm
I'm
guessing.
The
other
thing
we
could
do
is
if
we're
going
to
set
up
an
organization
for
gates
that
might
be
an
opportunity
to
create
a
a
similar,
linked
email.
A
I
wonder
how
yeah,
but
we
couldn't
do
the
do.
We
couldn't
enter
the
the
domain
of
okd
dot
io.
It
would
have
to
be
something
else
right
unless
we
could
convince
the
powers
that
be
to
route
to
the
mx
records
to
a
different
mail
server
than
red
hats,
so
it
would.
A
Right
unless
we
use
the
get
email
addresses
that
you
can
generate,
I
don't
know:
let's
wait
for
diane
to
chime
in
on
this,
because
there's
a
bunch
of
legal
stuff.
A
That's
wrapped
up
in
this
that
I
don't
completely
understand
because
on
the
one
hand,
it's
it's
an
open
source
project,
but
a
lot
of
stuff
is
pulling
us
in
a
separate
direction
away
from
the
sponsor,
which
is
red
hat,
and
I
don't
know
how
much
the
sponsor
of
this
project
like
wants
to
keep
their
hands
in
it
and
internal
external
resources,
because
she
was
going
to
find
out
about
even
being
able
to
do
a
separate
gear
repository-
and
I
haven't
heard
back
on
that.
Yet
so,
let's
shelve
that
until
we
until
we
know
better.
A
I
understand
you
know
and
if
you
can't
that's
fine,
this
is
an
ongoing
thing
code
of
conduct.
We
did
that
logo
for
slides.
I
got
that,
let's
see
here
and
you
saw
the
video
actually
it's
in
the
new
business
session.
We'll
talk
about
that
michael
did.
You
take
care
of
all
of
the
4.9
references.
D
B
A
A
A
Yeah,
actually
I
can,
I
can
do
that
to
make
it
it
does.
It
does
seem
a
little
sort
of
backwards.
So,
yes,
I
can.
I
can
do
that.
That's
an
easy
fix.
A
A
Task
list:
let's
see,
we
can
actually
change
this
task
list.
A
Done
code
of
conduct
review
is
done,
oh
of
conduct
edit.
A
B
B
A
First
bit
of
conducted
edits,
write-up,
guide
on
site,
automation,
manipulate
charter
me
and
then
from
diane.
We
need
goal.
A
We
gather
legal
inputs,
google
input
on
twitter
on
external
repo
and
social
media.
C
Okay,
well,
we
had
an
item
last.
I
guess
two
weeks
ago
on
task
boards
and
I
was
having
a
look
at
that
and
because
I
use
gitlab
for
my
students,
you
know
the
I
was
happy
when
very
quickly
up
popped
get
lab
references,
and
I
was
somewhat
stunned
at
the
level
of
happiness
around
gitlab
that
came
in
the
last
week's
meeting,
because
I
thought
that
everybody
was
totally
on
board
with
github,
since
all
of
our
stuff
is
on
github.
C
So
the
I
guess
from
my
personal
standpoint,
if
there's
a
good
solution
on
git
lab,
I'm
happy
with
that
now
for
us.
C
The
you
know
I
can
continue
on
with
with
general
search,
but
but
I
guess
should
we
be
considering
moving
to
get
lab.
A
I
think
I
think
the
general
consensus
is
that
we
can
diane
was
going
to
do
one
last
check
to
see
if
it's
okay
for
us
to
to
move
the
community
stuff
to
an
external
repo.
But
I
my
thought
was
the
general
consensus
was
that
people
are
on
board
with
git
lab
michael
bryan.
Does
that
seem
like
your
interpretation
of
the
facts,.
B
C
B
Yeah
good
good,
I
was
just
going
to
say
from
a
personal
thing
if
we're
going
to
move
the
okd
side
and
I've
never
used
gitlab.
So
just
as
long
as
the
automation
is
similar,
so
we
can
do
the
github
pages
equivalent
and
the
automation's
there
to
build
it
and
it'd
be
good.
If,
if
we
just
check
that
bruce,
if
you're
familiar
with
that,
if
you
can
just
confirm
that
those
similar
features,
they
may
not
be
the
same,
but
there's
you
can
do
the
same
thing.
Basically,
then
I
can
see
no
issue.
C
Right
now,
I
think
I
think,
that's
an
even
more
important
point
than
the
task
board
type
thing.
C
Yeah,
why
don't
you
I'm
in
the
middle
of
midterms
this
week?
So
it's
it's
a
bit
busy,
but
why
don't
you
give
me
a
task
to
see
if
I
can
get
the
the
beta
site
running
on
git
lab,
okay,.
B
C
Right
that
should
that
should
be
a
problem
I
wouldn't
think,
but
the
whether
or
not
the
automation
would
work
is,
I
guess,
significant
issue.
A
All
right:
well,
I
will
hit
stop
then
on
this,
and
we
will
do
our
various
tasks
and
meet
back
here
in
two
weeks
and
of
course
the
regular
meeting
is
next
week.