►
From YouTube: SLSA Biweekly (December 15, 2022)
Description
Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cx3fOBfic6A0xc2on25ITK4vQHUdxgBmJoSS1LPqDJo/edit
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
This
is
the
monthly
meeting
for
the
salsa
community
for
folks
that
are
new
and
don't
have
access.
Please
do
sign
in
I'm
posting
it
again.
Just
in
case
you
don't
have
access
to
the
document
is
anyone
new
to
the
group
and
if,
yes,
we
usually
give
time
for
the
new
folks
to
introduce
themselves
and
can
I
give
us
a
little
intro
about
you
and
and
what's
interesting
about.
What's
also
for
you.
D
Well,
yeah
I
could
start
and
I
apologize.
Cygnus
is
running
through
my
household
as
well,
so
I'm
gonna
lose
my
voice.
Forgive
me,
my
name
is
Jeff
I'm
from
Sunnyside
work
on
the
devrel
team,
with
Teresa
here,
I've
been
involved
in
openssf.
The
best
practices
in
education
groups
also
got
introduced
to
the
end
user
group
and
the
S2
c2f
Group,
which
talked
a
bit
about
salsa,
sometimes
involved
in
the
software
supply
chain,
stuff,
so
sort
of
want
to
understand
the
best
practices
of
mature
building.
C
Yep
I'm
new
as
well
also
A,
co-worker
of
Jeff's
I'm,
a
developer
advocate
I'm
at
soda
type
and
yeah
I'm,
really
just
looking
for
ways
to
get
involved,
particularly
interested
in
hearing
about
tooling
I've
kind
of
been
in
contact
with
some
projects
that
are
are
using
salsa
as
well
so
scarcity
here.
What's
new
I
guess.
A
A
A
Essentially,
you
know
what
does
it
mean
to
be
salsa
level,
one
two,
three
four
making
sure
that
it's
clearly
defined.
If
we
need
to
Pivot
because
of
you
know,
maybe
new
requirements,
that's
the
specification
group.
They
try
to
make
sure
that
we
are
moving
forward.
The
positioning
group
is
more
about
telling
the
world
you
know
what
salsa
is.
A
I
believe
all
three
of
these
have
weekly
meetings
at
different
time.
Specifications
on
Monday,
positionings
on
Tuesdays
and
tooling,
is
on
Fridays,
so
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
a
lay
of
the
land
so
to
speak,
so
we
don't
have
an
update
for
specification
or
tooling.
Today,
I
suspect,
I
know
one
person
is
sick,
our
family
is
sick
and
then
the
other
person
I
might
be
out
on
vacation.
So.
B
So
we've
been
kind
of
collaborating
in
those
Chris.
K
has
a
really
interesting
document
that
we're
kind
of
collaborating
on
and
making
comments
around
verification
of
build
systems.
So
that's
kind
of
like
the
bigger
piece
within
the
spec
Community
or
taking
off
the
rest
of
the
year
rejoining
back
in
January
for
the
next
meetings.
After
that.
A
C
A
But
we
don't
know
who
created
the
salsa.dev
website
and
we
wanted
input
on
who
we
should
be
working
with.
To
make
sure
that
you
know
the
person
behind
is
also
that
Dev
kind
of
also
has
input
so
I'm,
not
sure.
If
folks
on
the
call
know
who
we
should
be
working
with.
But
we
are
more
than
happy
to
take
on
the
work
with
Tracy
to
to
do
that.
Landing.
Page
foreign.
C
A
The
Providence
got
split
up
in
the
specification
for
1.0
and
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
okay.
We
need
to
be
more
coordinated
in
salsa,
but
we
also
need
to
be
more
coordinated
in
the
supply
chain,
Integrity
working
group
across
the
different
subgroups,
Fresca
salsa
and
the
s2c2f,
and
so
yesterday
we
agreed
that
we
do
need
a
priority
and
kind
of
coordination
across
the
different
subgroups
for
supply
chain
integrity
and
then
once
we
have
that
priority,
I,
I,
think
or
the
prioritization,
and
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
in
2023
I.
A
So
really,
there
needs
to
be
tighter
collaboration,
I
think
between
the
Sig
leads
for
salsa,
but
then
also
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
marching
to
the
same
beat
of
the
drum
for
2023,
so
that
we
can.
You
know
get
more
done
and
you
know
again
just
make
it
better
overall.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
there
are
comments
or
questions.
A
So
I'll
try
to
bring
this
up
again
in
the
next
meeting
right
up
again
and
next
meeting,
since
this
is
a
lighter
meeting,
but
that's
just
kind
of
a
a
heads
up
that
I'm
hoping
to
have
more
coordination
between
the
different
sigs
so
that
we
can
at
least
from
the
positioning
side.
We
can
be
more
productive
because,
right
now,
it's
very
difficult
when
things
are
not
supposed
to
be
changing
without
us.
Realizing
and
Asura
did
have
a
five
minute
agenda,
but
I
don't
see
Asura
on.
A
A
E
Yeah
hi,
so
I
guess
this
kind
of
is
similar
to
the
question
you
ask
about
priorities
and
how
we
better,
educate
or
like
inform
the
outside
community.
So
I
wanted
to
throw
an
idea.
I
wanted
to
have
some
feedback
and
opinion
on
whether
there's
a
need
for
also
having
some
sort
of
priorities
on
which
conferences
we
should
attend
and
talk
about
salsa
and
whether
we
should
have
a
salsa
conference
like
something
similar
to
the
sixth
law
conference.
Would
that
be
useful?
E
A
E
Yeah
I
guess
the
same
question
would
be
like.
Why
is
six
token
not
part
of
the
policy
safe,
Summit
I
think
I've
heard
that
the
open,
ssf
Summit
might
not
happen
next
year.
So
you
know,
I
haven't
talked
to
everyone
involved,
but
I
think
they
are
discussing
whether
they
want
to
have
that
Summit
yeah,
so
I
you're
right
it
would
be
the
first
salsa
Cohen
I
I.
Don't
have
an
answer
of.
Why
not
I
guess
the
open.
Ssf
Summit
is
mostly
for
open,
ssf
members.
E
A
E
Could
have
a
track
in
a
more
like
software,
open
source
software
developer
conference,
something
like
first
Dem
I,
think
the
deadline
has
passed
but
I
guess
this
kind
of
discussion,
I
wonder
where
it's
happening
I
mean
who
would
be
interested
in
you
know,
looking
into
it,
I
mean
I
would
be
interested,
but
I'd
like
to
know
I'd
like
to
see
what
people
think
first,
because
it
takes
some
effort
so
and
I,
don't
know
where
it
falls
in
the
priority
list
that
you
mentioned
earlier.
Yeah.
B
That
would
be
like
the
key
right
like
we
could
have
it
kind
of
as
the
centerpiece
of
of
salsa
con
right
so
like
obviously,
it
probably
wouldn't
be
a
standalone
Conference,
of
course
right
so
like
attaching
to
to
one
of
those
well
attended
ones,
already
kind
of
like
Sig
storycon
had
been,
which
I
think
that
seemed
like
a
good
success.
I,
unfortunately,
wasn't
able
to
go,
but
I
think
that
I
think
you're
onto
something
with
that.
So
I'd
be
Keen
to
help
assist
you
with
with
that
type
of
thing.