►
B
A
A
D
A
A
D
D
A
A
A
D
C
D
A
A
I,
don't
see
one
when
I'm
searching
so
since
I
don't
see
one
specifically
for
criticality
score.
That
would
mean
that
the
right
channel
to
discuss
this
would
be
our
working
group.
Channel.
Our
securing
critical
projects,
working
group,
yeah,
so
yeah,
don't
hesitate
to
you
know,
drop
a
note
in
slack
tag
Caleb.
A
D
A
C
D
C
D
C
C
A
C
A
C
A
I
agree,
so
if
we
get
to
the
I'm
looking
at
our
last
meeting
and
I
I
feel
like
I
had
a
really
good
idea,
which
was
we
kind
of
have
two
things
going
on
or
what
we
don't.
Really.
We
don't
have
two
things
going
on:
we
we
had
an
an
old
list
and
then
we
have
our
new
idea,
which
is
essentially
going
to
be
all
all
projects
that
come
from
surveys.
You
know
which
we
get
out
into
the
open,
and
then
we
evaluate
projects
based
on
the
survey
and
based
on
automated
data.
C
C
B
A
So
V2,
you
know
we,
the
main
problem
was
we
had.
We
decided,
you
know
we're
gonna
have
this
Google
list,
this
Google
form
to
fill
out
a
spreadsheet,
but
we
also
decided
we
needed
to
have
like
criticalities
like
when,
when
we
as
a
group
meet
and
look
at
that
and
vote
critical
or
not,
we
need
data
in
front
of
us
and
we
need
to
see
that
criticality
score.
We
need
to
see
the
download
counts.
We
need
to
see
that
Harvard.
A
B
A
A
A
C
I
mean
frankly,
the
I
mean
I,
know,
there's
a
couple,
people
that
were
unhappy
with
the
V1
creation
process
because
we
were
under
the
gun
because
we
we
needed
as
input
for
the
token
distribution,
but
I
think
the
reality
is-
and
this
is
this
is
not
a
critique
of
you
at
all.
But
basically
without
a
pressure
of
a
timeline,
it
doesn't
happen.
Yeah.
C
C
Everyone
so
hi,
so
I
was
just
commenting
that,
although
you
know,
although
I
know
that
some
people
were
hey,
wait
a
minute,
this
was
kind
of
hurried,
the
first
version,
the
the
reality
was
without
a
we
got
to
get
it
done
by
some
date,
and
you
know
a
little
slip
can
lit.
We
can
live
with,
but
really
without
the
pressure
of
the
date
it
just
it's.
C
A
B
A
C
B
A
C
Well,
you
probably
could
I
think
we
did
manage
to
do
the
original
one
meeting,
but
that
was
because
most
of
the
work
was
done
ahead
of
time
by
people
creating
the
here's,
the
Deltas
and
then
arguing
over
the
proposed
deltas
I,
see
but
yeah.
You
know
what
I
I
I.
You
know
what.
Maybe
we
could
do
that
if,
if
people
would
create
at
a
time
a
list
of
a
sheet
whatever
of
here's?
What
should
you
know
here?
Are
the
proposed
Deltas
ahead
of
time?
C
E
Yeah
and
I'm
going
to
make
an
an
argument
that
I
think
we
can
get
a
lot
more
done
during
the
work
group
meetings,
because
yeah
thinking
back
to
to
to
that
first
iteration
I
mean
we
got
a
lot
done
in
those
those
couple
of
calls.
We
had
and
I
think
it's
just
because
you
know
we
had
everyone
at
the
table.
We
had
everyone
discussing
so
I'm
gonna
lean
towards
maybe
trying
to
get
more
done
in
the
work
group
meetings
as
opposed
to
offline,
especially
you
know
stuff.
C
I
I
think
what
worked
last
time
on
version.
One
was
that
we
pre-created
a
Google
sheet
of
of
what
was
on
the
table
for
discussion,
and
then
the
work
group
enabled
people
to
create
the
consensus
argue
quickly
back
and
forth,
yay
or
nay,
and
you
know,
and
either
convince
somebody,
or
at
least
you
know,
putting
all
the
cards
on
the
table
said.
A
C
E
But
yeah
that
really
worked
I
think
Jeff,
because
it
was
almost
just
like
a
almost
like
a
multi-tiered
system
right.
So
we
would
have
candidate
projects
and
then
you
know
something
would
happen,
some
kind
of
analysis
discussion.
What
have
you
and
then
we
would
get.
You
know
the
the
the
final
I
guess
you
could
say,
or
the
the
the
recommend,
the
the
set
of
the
projects
that
are
deemed
critical.
So
if,
if
that
worked,
I'm
happy
to
keep
doing
it
or
yeah.
A
E
C
B
B
B
C
A
C
B
E
But
yeah
but
I'm
in
agreement,
I
think
if
we
did
a
you
know
a
couple
of
these
exercises
and,
like
you
said
David
when
I
joined
in
set
a
deadline
for
this
I
think
we
could
probably
get
cut
another
cut
out
that
we
can
say
you
know
you
know
we
did
all
this
and
it's
gonna
ideally
continue
to
be
updated.
You
know
as
things
change,
but
this
is
our.
This
is
our
version
of
this
is
our
set
and
stand
by
in
some
way.
A
I
mean
we're
not
even
we're
not
even
close
to
that,
like
we're
just
trying
to
get
an
input
form
set
up.
You
know
we're
not
even
at
the
point
where
we're
like
sending
the
these
out
for
voting
like
we're
still
just
voting
as
a
working
group.
We're
just
trying
to
get
more
automated
and,
very
you
know,
diverse
input
into
the
process.
Yeah
yeah,
which
I
think
is
a
good
step.
C
Yeah
I
do
think
that
what
really
I
mean
there
are
things
that
didn't
work
well
last
time,
I
I
think
the
very
very
short
fuse
was
a
problem.
Basically,
but
you
know
I
I
do
think
that
a
lot
of
what
made
it
a
lot
easier
was
the
ahead
of
time
making
the
list
letting
people
write
down.
Why
and
letting
people
read
asynchronously,
but
then
the
synchronicity
comes
in
that
discussion.
E
C
You
know
a
scorecard
a
scorecard.
An
openness
is
a
scorecard
result.
For
example,
that
would
be
a
very
interesting,
maybe
Greta
galdi
signal
criticality
is
much
more
focused
on
how
many
people
are
supporting,
it
are,
are
contributing
to
it.
So
it
does.
It
does
miss
the
ones
where
it's
kind
of
abandoned
where,
but
still
it
can
be
helpful.
E
C
So
I
guess,
if
there's
any
other
columns
like
like
scorecard
value
or
criticality
value,
and
if
people
want
to
fill
them
in
well,
if
we've
got,
we've
got
an
automated
way
to
filter,
that's
awesome,
but
if
we
don't
having
people
manually
who
are
proposing
it
try
to
fill
it
in
comments.
Thoughts
was
kind
of
the
justification.
I
think
that
was
helpful
and
I.
Think
in
retrospect
it
would
have
been
far
more
helpful
if
people
had
any
proposer
had
filled
in
those
ahead
of
time.
A
C
That
way,
if
somebody
takes
a
week
off,
you
still
give
them
a
week
to
work
on
it
any
longer.
Well,
I
mean
yeah,
I,
think
I.
Think
a
month
at
most
I
mean
what
I
mean.
This
is
version
one
you
still
are
going
to
want
to
work
on
version
two
right,
yeah,
here's,
the
problem.
If
you
give
yourself,
if
you
give
yourself,
let's
say
you
give
yourself
three
months:
I
will
tell
you
what
will
happen
two
and
a
half
months.
Nothing
will
happen
and
the
last
two
weeks
work
will
happen.
So
why?
C
A
C
A
C
Right
right,
but
but
I
I
think
what
you
need.
First,
meaning
is
hey.
We've
been
working
on
V2
it's
taking
longer
than
anticipated.
Let's
come
up
with
an
updated
one
and
basically
walk
through
a
process
which
I
think
is
basically
copy.
The
current
tab
have
everybody
add,
proposed
changes
with
with
and
filling
in
information,
and
then
we
walk
through
the
Deltas.
A
E
E
E
To
update
this
and
like
keep
it
fully
updated
all
the
time,
so
the
more
we
can
automate
it,
the
better
for
sure
or
the
more
we
can
update
it.
Maybe
as
part
of
our
processes
like
you
know,
as
we
do
another
iteration,
let's
say
or
or
do
some
kind
of
exercise
as
a
work
group,
you
know
part
of
that
involves.
You
know,
updating
this.
This
spreadsheet
yeah.
C
C
E
C
It
can't
be
a
disco,
because
it's
just
too
big
yeah
argue
the
same.
That
you
could
argue.
I
mean
kubernetes,
for
example,
is
huge,
but
it
is
still
a
single
thing.
I
think
it's
not
so
much
size
it's
is
it
really
a
single
thing
or
is
it
a
huge
mass
of
of
code
from
other
sit
right?
If
it's
in
an
amalgamation
of
other
projects,
it
doesn't
count.
C
C
Don't
do
distro
or
anything
like
that,
where
it's
really
a
combination
of
other,
whereas
kubernetes
as
it's,
it's
actually
bigger
than
it's
bigger
than
some
operating
system.
Kernels,
it's!
It's
still.
You
know
a
single
entity,
there's
a
single
repo.
There's
a
you
know,
a
group
of
people
who
view
those
as
a
single
project.
A
E
C
C
Your
if
you're
going
to
do
it
over
a
four
week
period,
you
can
say
that
the
middle
week
period
is
for
a
you
could
have
at
least
two
agenda
items.
One
is
how
are
things
going,
questions
and
the
other
is
okay.
Let's
talk
about
V2
yeah,
so
making
it
clear
that
this
is
not
the
end
version.
This
is
just
a
you
know.
We
did
stuff
in
what
22
to
21..
You
know
we
did
stuff
in
2021.
This
is
a
way
to
at
least
have
an
update.
C
C
Well-
and
you
know
what
I
don't
think
if
the
result
is
relatively
minor
tweaks
and
a
few
additions,
I,
don't
think
that's
a
I,
don't
think
that's
a
bad
result.
If
that's
what
ends
up
happening,
even
if
it's
just
a
minor
refresh,
you
know,
have
making
sure
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
improve
it
is
still
a
good
thing,
even
though
it
would
be
great
to
do
this
broader
thing
that
you
know
Jack
pointed
out
which
is
I.
B
C
C
C
B
A
C
C
Yeah,
it's
not
like.
Oh
my
gosh,
you
know
four
versus
six
weeks,
someone's
gonna
get
hanged,
but
I
just
I
I
fear
that
we
were
supposed
to
have
this
done
by
last
summer
and
it
hasn't
happened
and
it
just
it.
This
is
the
sort
of
thing
that
just
keeps
getting
easily
pushed
forward
yeah
and
that's
what
I
want
to
I
want
to
try
to
figure
out
how
to
unstick
this.
E
B
D
E
C
Right,
I,
I
think
at
least
Michael
scavetta,
Michael
Windsor's
had
a
complicated
schedule
recently,
but
I
think
Michael
scaveto
would
certainly
be
interested.
That's
actually
a
good
idea
because
he
might
actually
have
some
helpful
tips
on
what
they're
looking
I
mean.
I
I
think
this
list
has
other
groups
who
want
to
use
it,
not
just
Alpha
Omega
but
I
mean
for
Alpha
Omega.
The
most
important
thing
for
them
is
the
URL,
where
the
heck
is
this
thing.
D
C
E
C
E
C
C
C
C
A
C
B
A
A
C
E
B
E
I
mean
because
one
thing
I
almost
wanna,
avoid
this
because,
like
even
like
in
our
first
in
our
first
iteration
of
this,
you
know
like,
for
example,
I.
Don't
think
I
added
this,
but
like
someone
put
like
boring
SSL
for
example,
and
there's
one
comment,
Michael
wins
are
just
like
really
question
mark
like
so
the
reason
I
bring
that
up
is
I.
E
E
B
A
C
E
C
E
C
C
B
C
All
right
yeah,
we
need
to
fix
this,
but
you
know
so
basically
I
think
before
you
know
we
before
any
final
group
gathering
on
which
one's
important,
obviously
we
you
would
need
to
fill
out,
ideally
all
the
columns,
so
that
you,
you
know
at
least
the.
Why
is
it
you
know?
Comments?
Thoughts
is
really
justification.
In
my
mind,.