►
A
B
B
Yeah
I
was
I,
was
sick.
Last
last
meeting
and
actually
I
haven't
been.
If
anybody
wants
to
remind
what
happened
I
do,
although
I
do
see
the
notes.
You
know
if
we
want
to
pick
up
where
we
left
off,
feel
free
to
jump
in
all
right.
So
yeah,
it's
about
five.
After
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started
any
new
faces
anybody
here
that
has
been
a
while
or
is
new
and
want
to
introduce
yourself.
Please
go
ahead.
B
We
do
want
to
alternate
this
meeting
time
to
be
early
for
the
Mia
folks
and
then
late
for
Apec
folks,
so
that
we
can
get
everybody
to
to
join
so
yeah
I,
don't
know
again,
I
don't
know
what's
going
on
there,
but
I'll
I'll
follow
up
and
I,
don't
see
anything
next,
but
I
I
do
I
did
see
on
the
previous
meeting
that
there
was
a
continued
discussion
on
the
charger
and
that
there
was
a
Voice
vote.
Anybody
anybody
was
there
Jacques.
Do
you
remember.
D
D
No
I
think
no
I
think
the
idea
was
to
hold
off
until
this
week,
because
if,
if
I
remember
correctly,
there
were
going
to
be
some
edits
made
to
the
Charter,
basically
that
glitchy
bit
I
can't
remember
the
name
of
there's
there's
one
where
it
sort
of
says
that
the
group
sends
a
representative
to
attack
it's
like
that's,
not
how
Tech
works,
yeah,
so
I
think
that
was.
That
was
the
amendment
that
was
necessary,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
enough
folks
today
to
really
justify
doing
that.
Yeah.
B
B
D
Yeah
the
the
thing
that
I
was
like,
as
as
we
develop
a
list
in
various
methods,
one
of
the
things
that
that
came
up
was
you
know
if,
if
the
list
sort
of
changes
dynamically
or
day
by
day,
that
will
be
difficult
for
a
lot
of
people
to
consume
and
that
doing
it
quarterly.
You
know
like
additions
like
spring
23
would
be
easier
for
large
organizations
to
ingest
and
work
with,
but
I
see.
Randall
has
his
hand
up
random.
C
Yeah
I
think
we
also
how
to
organize.
We
were
going
to
have
like
a
a
side
meeting
about
with
Caleb
and
I
think
we
wanted
that
to
be
this
community
if
I
remember
now
correctly,
because
we
wanted
to
have
a
conversation
on
how
they
are
developing
criticality
scores,
because
that
tool
has
the
functionality
to
basically
get
a
list
and
run
criticality
scores
on
that
entire
list.
So
I
think
the
conversation
was
if
we
were
going
to
put
that
list
together.
How
would
that
work
out?
C
B
D
C
That's
really
what
it
is.
That's
really
like.
It's
basically
like
the
discussion
of
how
said
list
would
work,
and
how
would
we
add
to
this
list
because
the
way
they
have
the
tool,
because,
basically
originally
when
we
were
specing
all
of
this
out,
they
had
a
python
tool
which
has
been
deprecated
so
now
they
have
a
new
tool
and
it's
kind
of
based
around
the
concept
of
you
feeding
it
a
list.
So
that's,
basically
where
we're
at
right
now
is
so
what
would
this
list
be?
How
would
we
come
up
with
that
that
list?
C
I
think
a
big
point
of
discussion
also
was
that
the
criticality
score
gives
like
a
a
tangible
number,
and
there
was
discussion
on
whether
or
not
that
tangible
number
would
incentivate
or
like
the
wrong
ideology,
because
this
is
not
a
ranking
system.
This
is
supposed
to
be
a
set
of
projects,
so
foreign.
B
A
D
C
B
D
C
D
D
B
D
Yeah
as
long
as
we
I
mean
as
long
as
we,
we
publicize
it
or
service
that
information
I,
think
that's
fine,
yeah,
and
definitely
we
want
Caleb
to
be
there
since
he's
been
the
the
driving
factor
for
criticality
I
believe
he
now
has
another
person
working
with
him
right
as
well
in
Sydney,
so
definitely
worth
joining
the
dots
I'm
just
Loosely
against
having
a
specific
Standalone
meeting
separate
from
the
this
regular
one.
So
long
as
the
times
alternators,
we
originally
planned.
A
B
C
No
we're
kind
of
a
hold
on
that
because
we
wanted
to
know
what
criticality
score
has
and
I
think.
There
was
a
couple
other
people
that
had
interest
in
working
together
on
all
that.
So
hopefully
we
can
gather
them
all
to
the
meeting
so
because
we
were
kind
of
what
happened
last
time
at
the
meeting.
Is
that
once
we
hit
this
topic,
it
kind
of
took
over
the
whole
meeting,
because
there
was
a
lot
of
insight
on
like
how
what
like
yeah
so
I
think
we're
pretty
much
on
hold
on
that.
B
C
B
Like
or
I
I
ask
this
every
time,
I'm,
sorry,
but
like
do.
We
want
to
put
a
should
we
more
formalize
or
the
ingestion
engine
as
a
as
a
kind
of
a
code
project
by
making
links
in
the
working
group,
read
me
and
or
putting
it
in
a
open,
ssf
repo,
so
that
we
can
kind
of
have
more
visibility
for
for
people.
What.
C
I
have
on
my
side,
so
you
guys
know
is
basically
we've
been
working
on
collecting
things
like
weekly
downloads.
If
that's
available,
then,
when
the
last
commit
was
made,
when
the
last
release
was
made,
how
many
contributors
does
the
project
have
basic
stuff,
like
that?
That's
what
we're
focused
on
and
I
think
that
the
there's
I
said
some
overlap,
but
yeah
I
have
no
problem,
formalizing
that
and
putting
it
in
open,
ssf
repo.
C
D
B
A
C
I
think
the
Outlook
last
time
was
that
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
like
live
on
GitHub,
which
is
what
makes
the
GitHub
route
attractive
and
I
think
GitHub
does
have
a
way,
there's
different
ways.
I
have
we're
still
exploring
this,
but
I
know
there's
ways
of
like
running
diffs,
to
extract
information,
especially
like
on
markdown
documents
and
how
you
can
go
about
extracting
information
and
like
processing
that
information.
C
C
A
Yeah
I,
don't
read
seems
easy
what
we
do
on
machine
Community
First
in
signing
it's
not
automated,
but
it's
exactly
that.
So
if
you
want
to
sign
a
new
machine,
you
send
a
PR
to
Shane
GitHub
and
people
that
have
access
to
to
to
check
out
the
signing
requests.
Do
that
via
GitHub.
It
makes
things
easier,
so
I
think
probably
the
same
module
here.
You
can
apply
perfectly
right.
C
A
A
C
A
B
B
All
right,
well,
I,
think
we'll
go
ahead
and
and
dismiss
if
anybody,
nobody
has
anything
else
to
talk
about
sorry
again,
for
the
time
should
have
should
have
realized
that
ahead
of
time,
I'll
get
that
again,
I'll
get
that
set
up
and
make
sure
that
we
have
again
this
topic
with
with
Caleb
for
next
for
next
meeting,
so
that
we
can
get
unblocked
on
this.
These
questions
in
these
situations
that
we
have
for
the
for
the
ingestion
yeah
anybody
have
anything
to
add
before
we
go.