►
From YouTube: OSS-SIRT SIG - Part of BEST WG (October 3, 2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
You
know
I,
don't
think
I'll
be
making
it
to
the
edgy
Sig
tomorrow,
because
the
best
Sig
this
time.
This
is
not
working
for
me
anymore,
but-
and
you
know
last
week,
couldn't
ghost
people
that's
rude.
C
Little
worlds
burning
down
problem
with
my
day
job
but
upstream's,
going
great.
B
C
A
A
A
A
B
A
C
C
C
C
C
D
So
it's
working
out,
interestingly
well,
I
think
so
we
had
an
interest.
Well,
we
had
a
fairly
good
first
meeting
took
a
handful
of
notes.
We
pretty
much
all
have
action
items
and
hopefully
we'll
get
some
of
the
non
blocking
work
started.
We
have
taken
meeting
notes
which
are
in
GitHub
straight
up
in
there
as
basically
we
didn't
use
discussions,
but
we
use
issues.
I
think
sorry,
it's
been
over
a
week
and
a
week
a
year
in
my
head,
but
yes
also
long
night.
But
yes,
it's
been
good.
D
C
And
one
thing
that
I
really
appreciate
how
Francis
is
massaging
his
piece
of
the
plan
is,
he
is
weaving
in
dependencies.
So
if
he
is
waiting
on
different
parts
of
the
plan
or
anything
externally,
he's
documenting
that
as
part
of
his
section
of
the
plan,
which
I
thought
was
pretty
cool.
D
So
yeah
I
just
pasted
the
new
plan,
the
new
3.0
execution
plan
and
the
meeting
notes.
Sorry
in
the
chat
room
here.
Basically,
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
during
the
meeting
is
we
reviewed
the
goals
and
to
something
more
refined?
D
B
No
but
I
do
appreciate
how
very
clear
you
made
it
on
the
points
where
you're
waiting
on
other
people
Emoji
for
the
win,
because
that
really
does
stand
out
very
well
and
it's
quite
effective.
C
C
B
C
If
you're
part
of
first
it
might
be,
they
might
have
recorded,
it
might
be
part
of
their
TC
archives,
but
Dario
as
a
character.
If
you
get
a
chance
to
talk
to
him
now,
hopefully
I've
stalled
long
enough
that
Randall's
ready
for
talk
about
section
one
I
am.
E
So
yeah
sorry
I,
just
I
literally,
was
up
at
like
to
like
four
and
then
I
had
one
two
hours
of
sleep,
so
it's
actually
somewhat
normal
for
me
so
but
anyway,
but
yeah.
So
I
did
update
our
section.
One
notes
on
GitHub
last
night
during
everything
I
had
going
on
I
added
deliverables
in
our
like
a
little
deliverable
section,
I
tried
organizing
what
exactly
we're
doing
so.
Therefore,
I
know
that
there's
I
think
section.
Two
is
also
waiting
for
section
one.
E
So
that's
why
I
was
trying
to
Define
like
what
we
need
to
actually
be
creating
and
having
available
for
people,
so
that
is
all
on
GitHub
and
yeah.
That's
that's.
E
We
didn't
really
have
a
meeting
yesterday,
because
I
was
the
only
one
in
the
meeting,
so
I
used
that
time
to
kind
of
organize
what
we
had
and
I
had
already
started
to
do
some
interviews
with
certain
people
like
Mike
McQuade
from
get
or
Homebrew
and
I
have
a
meeting
hopefully
later
on
this
week
with
the
Gen
2
security
team.
So
that's
my
update.
F
Thought
I
might
be
next
hi
everyone
Hi
krobe,
so
on
one
hand
that
you
know
no,
but
it's
not
quite
a
qualified.
No.
Our
meeting
was
yesterday.
It
was
Meek,
Grove
and
Randall.
F
F
Yep
I
see
the
Francis
I
see
the
dependencies
on
two
in
your
in
your
mark
down
there,
yeah
I
mean
like
just
not
personal,
no,
no
not
to
get
that
way
at
all,
but
a
couple
of
our
section:
two,
whatever
Clause
two
meetings,
we
talked
a
lot
about
some
of
these
things,
so
we
knew
there
was
overlap
already,
but
I
am
I.
Think
I'm
now
more
aware,
there's
overlap
or
dependency.
D
F
Just
real
quickly,
three
has
Tech
stack
deployment,
maintenance,
recruitment,
but
anyway,
we'll
get
it
worked
out.
But
just
observing
thank
you
for
your
work
that
helps
me
sort
of
might
help
us
figure
out.
What's
going
on
in
two
I
have
a
second
here:
we've
been
working
on
a
Google
doc,
where
two
or
three
I
have
had
the
open
task
for
a
while
to
put
that
in
the
markdown,
which
is
you
probably
all,
have
the
link
but
I'll
paste
it
here
anyway,
and
this
hasn't
been
changed
in
a
while.
F
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
whole
lot
more
to
say
here
again
I
some
of
our
some
of
our
small
discussions
were
more
about,
in
my
opinion,
at
least
sort
of
what
are
all
the
possibilities
and
I
think
our
task
is
a
little
more
straightforward
than
that.
It
is
no
no
pick.
Some
maybe
they'll
need
to
change.
Maybe
we
have
to
discuss.
F
Maybe
we
have
to
draw
the
lines
between
one
and
two
and
three
but
pick
something
propose
it
and
sort
of
go
from
there,
so
I'm
expecting
to
update
our
official
markdown
file
this
week.
Two
and
four
are
getting
sorry
2.2
and
2.4.
Getting
swapped
and
I.
Think
rewriting.
You
know.
F
Kind
of
rewriting
this
based
on
our
messy
Google
Docs
notes
will
be
helpful
to
get
in
a
cleaner
dock
and
I'm
gonna,
throw
away
the
old,
Google
doc
notes,
because
they're
MS
I
think
that's
it,
but
I'll
ask
you,
know
Crow
and
Randall
you
were
there.
We
all
talked
yesterday.
Was
there
anything
else
from
two
that
you'd
care
to
add
or
was
important
sounding
to
you
either.
C
Of
you
I
think,
that's
a
good
summary
art
and
perhaps
since
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
other
items
to
discuss
today,
maybe
we
hash
out
this
group
kind
of
what
our
proposed
path
forward
is
going
to
be.
You
know,
I,
we
mentioned
in
arts
meeting
that
I
had
sent
a
note
out
to
the
group
asking
for
feedback
on
how
we
want
to
what
we'd
like
to
focus
on.
Do
we
hire
a
bunch
of
people
or
do
we
just
train?
C
F
Art
I
haven't
great
fine
with
me:
I
have
a
9
30
I
have
to
go
to
today,
though
so
I
feel
worse
anything.
You
want
me
to
definitely
comment
on
well.