►
Description
Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttqkcYPmYZyqvtkaHs92bx2UeVUiXDhuzP-0WbP11Fw/edit#heading=h.7o2ubzl5z39r
A
C
B
C
Oh
Vancouver
was:
was
nice
yeah.
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
Yeah,
so
did
the
talk
on
on
Thursday
and
the
structure
was
mainly
I
ended
up
talking
quite
a
bit
about
legitify
and
scorecard,
but
basically
also
showed
this
the
new
site
or
the
new
one
that
you're
just
kind
of
like
put
up
and
just
spoke
about.
C
The
structure
was
just
talking
about
why
we
needed
gitup
security
and
just
like
laying
the
foundations
there
and
then
just
walking
through
the
different
pieces
of
why
it's
important
to
actually
go
through
this
and
then
spoke
about
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
about
open,
ssf,
the
best
practices
working
group
and
also
dove
into
the
sem
guide,
work
and
then
also
towards
the
end
talked,
did
a
little
demo
about
legitify
and
scorecard
a
very
quick
demo
to
just
show
how
they
work
and
what
the
types
of
information
that
you
can
get
out
of
it
and
then
talked
about
that.
C
You
can
actually
extend
this
to
other
fcms,
but
then
also
mentioned
that,
where
this
legitify
support
scale
lab,
but
also
check
out
squawk
card,
because
there's
some
things
that
work
with
one
or
not
not
the
other.
But
it
was
a
50-minute
talk
seemed
to
be.
People
said
that
it
was
pretty
good,
so
so
it
was
good
to
just
kind
of
like
cover
that
I
didn't
I
wasn't
able,
because
I
was
also
kind
of
like
doing
it
from
a
lens
of
lessons
that
we
had
learned
at
F5.
C
I
also
spoke
about
what
we
were
doing
there.
We
were
on
that
stage
and
then
the
call
to
action
at
the
end
was
to
have
people
join
this
others
guide
and
also
told
them
that
we'd
be
meeting
next
at
this
time,
so
that
was
kind
of
like
a
quick
and
then
also
mentioned,
as
we
had
spoken
about
that
we'd,
probably
like
folks
to
who
had
more
get
lab
expertise
or
experience.
They
just
come
in
and
also
chat,
so
that
was
that
was
it.
C
C
The
crowd
was,
in
general,
for
the
overall
conference
seemed
pretty
like
scattered
and
not
as
bigger
as
previously
one.
It
could
be
just
budgetary
reasons,
so
the
crowd
was
not
as
big
as
usual.
He
is.
B
Yeah
I
think
I
was
speaking
with
Jory
earlier
in
the
week
and
among
other
things,
we
were
bemoaning
the
fact
that
in
many
places
and
many
companies
the
travel
money
faucet
has
been
turned
off.
So
that
was
certainly
the
case
for
me
and
unfortunately
so
well
I'm
hoping
that
by
September
when.
B
Open
when
we
have
openness,
open
source,
Summit
Europe
that
things
kind
of
are
starting
to
crawl.
Back
from
that.
D
C
Yeah
and
I
submitted
the
same
talk
for
for
EU
for
consideration
I,
just
in
the
hopes
that
something
will
change
right.
B
Yeah
has
there
been
any
other
feedback
that
people
have
had,
or
people
have
heard
about
the
current
state
of
the
the
current
state
of
things?
The
current
approach,
the
current
kind
of
like
direction
that
we're
going.
B
E
E
And
just
roughly,
when
approximately,
when
do
we
think
we'll
have
a
a
dunish
document
we
would
be
proud
to
share
with
the
world.
C
Yeah
I
think
now
that
now
that
things
have
settled
in
come
back
to
normal
at
least,
hopefully
on
my
side,
I
should
be
able
to
power
through
more
and
I'm,
focusing
in
more
on
that
as
well
internally.
So
at
least
for
me,
I
think
it'll
be
easy
within
the
next
week.
I
do
leave
a
next
couple
of
days.
I
will
be
able
to
get
that
PRN,
but
then
our
next
meeting
is
not
until
two
weeks
from
now.
E
And
if
there
is
need,
we
can
definitely
read
more
frequently:
that's
not
a
price,
don't
want
to
abuse
people's
time.
I
know
that
volunteering
isn't
necessarily
the
top
of
your
organization's
priorities.
B
Him
we
can
do
that.
We
can
I,
can
do
something
next
week
on
this
on
this
slot,
if
you're
Christine,
if
you
think
that
would
be
yeah,
what
I
was
thinking
was
because
I
think
what
you're,
what
your
PR
is,
is
adding
a
bunch
of
editorial,
not
editorial,
but
more
content,
basically
from
your
five
documents
into
the
structure
that
we
currently
have
right
and
I
think
that.
C
B
Would
be
really
beneficial
to
review
that
in
a
group,
so
maybe
we
should
do
a
call
next
week
at
this
time.
E
So
we
have
two
options
you
all
could
just
we
could
reuse
this
Zoom
link
and
make
our
own
personal
little
calendar
invites
or
I
could
ask
operations
to
change
the
meeting,
invite
with
a
high
likelihood
that
something
will
get
broken.
B
Okay,
I'm
a
little
worried
about
just
doing
a
personal
invite
because
but
I
mean
we
could
we
could
do
that.
E
Like
basically,
the
the
zoom
link
is
active,
so
it'll
work
and
what
we
could
do
is
send
a
note
to
the
mailing
list
and
use
in
slack
to
make
sure
people
are
aware,
but
just
statistically
there's
a
95
probability.
Something
will
get
temporarily
or
permanently
broken.
If
I
ask
operations
to
change
the
calendar
entry.
B
How
many
people
could
make
an
hour?
Because
the
problem
is
that
next
week,
this
time
slot
is
also
the
end
user
working
group
which
I
also
participate
in.
So
just
looking
at
my
calendar.
Let
me.
E
C
I,
probably
can't
do
it
an
hour
earlier,
but
I
could
yeah.
Okay,
there's
another
meeting
I
go
to,
which
is
an
hour
earlier.
A
E
That
that's
super
easy
I
can
ask
about
that
right
now.
We.
E
Perfect
super
idea,
let
me
go
send
the
note
so.
B
Let
me
put
something
in
the
calendar
for
next
Friday,
sorry
for
next
Thursday
I'm
going
to
use
the
email
addresses
that
are
in
the
minutes
as
people
to
invite
and
I'll
just
do
it
as
a
as
a
as
a
off
the
calendar,
invite
thing,
and
we
can
use
that
as
a
review
step,
and
then
we
can
have
something
to
we.
We
can.
We
can
therefore
have
something
to
present
back
to
to
the
group
the
following
week:
okay,.
C
A
B
B
Documents
tree
right
and.
A
A
B
I
I
think
so
that
so
you're
saying
that
there
are
some
right
now,
there's
some
duplicate,
some
duplicate
entries
in
the
in
the
list.
Okay,
is
that
something
that
you
want
to
do
that
you
think
we
should
do
manually
using
PRS
at
this
point.
B
Mean
it's
I
guess
the
question
is
I
I
kind
of
feel
like
we
should
not.
We
should
if
we
want
to
change
the
way
that
content
is
that
the
content
is
being
generated.
Then
we
should
do
that.
First
before
Christina's,
her
PR.
B
B
Each
one
of
the
individual
principles
can
be
regenerated
at
any
point
out
of
the
out
of
legitify
data
and
that
we
simply
we
we,
but
we
keep
the
readme
files
we
kind
of
not
freeze
them,
but
we
start
managing
them
through
through
GitHub
through
the
pr
process,
rather
than
regenerating
those
those
files.
Does
that
make
sense?
B
Okay
right!
So
that
way,
if
you
make
a
a
change
to
the
data,
we
can
regenerate
that
Singleton
page
or
whatever.
It
is.
You
know
or
the
all
of
the
all
of
those
pages,
but
we
don't
have
to
go
back
and
reapply
changes
to
the
index
files
to
the
to
the
readme
files
unless
they're,
unless
we're
adding
a
new
thing.
A
Yeah
yeah,
it
sounds
good
and
then
we'll
see
all
the
diffs
in
the
in
the
pull
request.
So.
A
B
Other
thing
that
came
to
mind
was:
what
was
that.
B
All
right,
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
my
I
had
something
in
my
head
about
another
kind
of
like
work
item
that
we
need
to
do:
oh
yeah!
No,
no!
No!
It's
no,
never
mind
actually,
because
I
think
that
that
we
just
we've
we've
kind
of
I
was
going
to
talk
about
how
we
could
do
some
kind
of
templating
system
that
would
allow
you
know
for
the
readme's,
but
I
don't
know
I,
don't
know.
If
we
really
need
to
do
that
at
this
point,
I
think
we
can.
B
We
can
just
kind
of
evolve
the
the
each
readme
file
and-
and
you
know,
add
editorial
content
and
then
that
will
eventually
become
the
first
cut
of
what
of
what
we
can
show
to
the
to
the
attack
and
to
other
parts
of
the
organization
and
eventually
start
talking
about
yeah.
C
So,
just
to
clarify
the
pr
I'll
be
doing
it's
just
initially.
The
last
time
we
had
spoken
about
our
dual
PR
so
that
you
could
see,
look
at
the
structure
to
see
how
that
would
fit
into
the
auto
generated
stuff
and
then,
at
that
time,
you're
talking
about
the
templating,
but
you
don't
think
we
will
need
that
right
away.
Well,.
B
I'm,
just
not
sure
if
we,
if
we
because
just
talking
through
it
just
now,
if
we
don't
re,
if
we're
not
going
to
regenerate
the
readme
files,
then
I
don't
think
we
we
will
need
kind
of
fancy.
You
know
templating
system,
I,
think
we
we
can
I
mean
if
we're
happy
with
the
structure
as
it
is
then
then
or
how
it
looks.
B
Rather,
then,
then
I
think
you
know
it's
it's
at
some
point
where
you
know
if
we
add
a
third
source
code
management
system,
for
instance,
then,
or
if
we
add
significant
new
coverage
or
new
principles,
then
we
are
going
to
need
to
regenerate
some
or
all
of
those
lists.
As
of
that,
the
lists
of
links
to
the
to
the
individual
principles
but
I
think
if
we're
just
making
changes
here
and
there
we
can
do
it
using
the
the
pr
using
GitHub
PRS.
C
C
It's
going
to
be
more
like
context
before
some
of
the
sections,
for
example,
introducing
like
for
organizations.
It
could
just
be
talking
of
generically
about
why
some
of
the
things
are
important,
so
think
of
it
as
like
context,
setting.
A
Okay
thanks,
so
maybe
we
can
use
the
next
meeting
to
just
yeah
I
think
that
go
and
go
over
the
section
together.
Maybe.
D
A
Editing
together
could
be
very
beneficial,
and
so
it
sounds
that
our
warm-up
is
very
short,
like
yeah
yeah,
I.
D
B
I
think
getting
someone
from
the
target
audience
to
review
is
I
think
that
we
want
to
have
the
first
draft
with
edit
with
editorial
changes
and
additional
material
yeah.
It
makes.
C
B
B
The
other
thing
that
Christine
that
I
wanted
to
ask
you
about
was
the
the
other
part
of
the
document
that
you
originally
shared
had
operations,
information
which
doesn't
really
isn't
in
the
scope
of
the
legitify
data.
But
it
was
additional
information
about
Opera
that
covers
the
roles
that
might
be
played
by
operations
in
managing
source
code
Management
systems,
and
is
that
something
that
you're
hoping
to
add
as
well
in
this
PR
or
in
a
subsequent
PR.
C
Yeah
yeah,
that
is
a
that,
is
a
good
question,
because,
typically
it's
one
of
the
things
that
people
need
to
think
about,
but
it
might
be,
it
may
not
be
within
the
scope,
it's
something
to
discuss
and
actually,
if
you,
if
you,
if
we
were
going
to
have
the
meeting
since
the
meeting
that
I
was
going
to
attend
at
the
same
time
of
just
before
the
end,
users
group
is
with
the
a
bunch
of
osbos
a
community
of
practice
for
osbos,
and
it
would
have
been
a
really
good
place
to
see
that
as
well,
because
that
meeting
happens
like
the
hour
before
the
end.
C
You
use
this
group
so
that
that's
another
place,
but
I
could
also
put
it
in
the
slack
Channel,
but
putting
it
in
front
of
people
might
have
been
a
better
idea
as
well
and
they
meet
they
meet
every
two
weeks
and
if
I
don't
catch
them
on
that
time,
slot
probably
gonna
be
four
weeks
from
now,
because
every
two
weeks,
it's
such
a
different
time
zone,
but
that's
another
possibility
I
can
I
can
share
within
the
group
as
well
on
the
slack
channel.
It's
called
to
do
to
do
a
group.
C
But
the
operations
thing
it
might
be-
it's
it's
probably
situational
to
a
particular
hospital,
so
it
might
not
be.
It
might
not
be
like
relevant,
but
it
could
be
called
a
summer
like
if
you're
doing
some
kind
of
operations.
These
are
things
that
you
might
think
about
if
you're
setting
up
something
room
but
I
don't
know
if
it
belongs
to
that
document
in
time.
C
It's
one
of
those
things
we
could
ask
an
ospo
I
know
for
for
us.
It
was
important.
A
B
I
think
we
we
might
want
to
just
close
up
and
I
mean
and
and
we
can
call
what
we
can
collect
thanks
probe
for
getting
the
channel
set
up,
WG
best
practices,
SCM
very
welcome,
so
let's
continue
to
collaborate
there
and
and
then
we
can
chat
next
week.
B
I
will
send
out
a
meeting,
invite
momentarily
and
and
also
just
notify
the
that
channel
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
that
and
we're
going
to
meet
on
the
same
Zoom
link
and
in
the
meantime
we
can
collaborate
in
in
that
channel.
Okay,
thank
you
all
right,
cool
thanks.
Thanks.