►
Description
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
B
B
A
There
you
are:
is
that
better
yep,
I'm
sure
you
miss
been
here
with
me,
because
I
brought
some
breakfast
for
caitlyn.
So.
B
A
I'm
the
I.t
guy
just
to
be
fair
too,
oh,
okay,
so
we
have
to.
Is
it
better
now
to
avoid
the
sound
everything's
good,
all
right?
A
Okay?
So
so
in
the
statement
today
we
have.
We
have
for
both
right,
like
the
chair
statement
for
this
public
meeting.
Consider
and
then
for
the
item
mentioned
below
sub
written
committee,
whatever
yeah,
and
then
we
have
one
for
the.
A
A
And
and
who's
from
dave
ryan
will
be
joining
us.
Yeah
dave
dave
will
be.
B
B
And
there's
the
statement
just
after
we
after
we
adjourn
iraq,
then
you
end
up
reading
the
statement
for
the
court
of
revision.
A
And
will
will
keep
everybody
unless
somebody
have
to
leave
right,
we've
been
through
this
before
somebody
doesn't
want
to
be
as
long
as
we
have
column
right
means
as
long
as
we
have
court
for
the
court
provision
or.
A
Nobody,
if
the
rest
they
wanna,
but
I
mean
everything
else,
should
be
straightforward.
Isn't
it
yep,
do
we
do
we
have
any
any
public
speaker.
B
A
Captain
yeah
so
we'll
do
the
consent
agenda
first
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
her
first.
Okay.
Is
that
what
you
you
prefer
or
do
the
emily
project
first
and
then
go
through
the
consent
after.
B
No,
it's
probably
good
to
go
through
the
consent
agenda
and
then
go
back
to
to
the
to
the
presentation.
A
I
I
don't
see
anything
is
gonna
get
unless
I'm
mistaken,
but
there's
nothing
really
because
it's
mostly
surplus,
like
surplus
slots
and
whatever
so.
B
Yeah
they
do
have.
There
is
a
presentation
if
you
want
it
for
the
the
item
number
three,
which
is
the
briefing
on
planning
and
development
charges
bill
ny197
there.
A
B
A
But
it's
not
a
very
long
presentation
right
now.
A
A
So
that's
why
steve
willis,
if
you
remember
he
pulled
that
the
last
time.
B
B
A
A
I
know
we
have
legal
available
if
you
want
a
presentation,
but
if
you
remember
in
the
planning
meeting,
they
didn't
have
enough
information,
so
they
must
have
more
information
now
than
they
did
before.
Am
I
correct
or.
B
Am
I
wrong?
I'm
I'm
honestly,
not
sure.
Mr
chair,
I
don't
know
if
that
I
don't
know
much
about
that
file
at
all.
That
was.
B
B
B
D
B
B
I
believe
it's
garrett
shrum,
that's
doing
the
presentation
on
that.
D
B
B
A
A
Good
morning,
colleagues,
our
staff
like
to
call
our
meeting
to
order
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
agenda
17
thursday
october
1st
2020.
This
meeting
be
held
through
electronic
participation
in
accordance
with
with
section
238
of
municipal
app
2001,
as
amended
by
bill
197,
the
kovic
19
economic
recovery
act
2020..
A
This
meeting
may
be
viewed
online
on
the
ottawa
city
council,
youtube
channel,
the
city
of
ottawa
continued
to
take
kovac
19
seriously
and
then
followed.
The
advice
of
provincial
and
federal
governments
is
making
significant
changes
to
the
service
and
programming
to
help
protect
health
and
well-being
of
the
community
city
hall
is
temporarily
closed.
To
help
stop
the
spread
of
kovac
19
in
person.
Committee
and
council
meeting
have
been
cancelled.
Such
meetings
as
warranty
will
be
held
electronically
under
further
notice
for
more
information
about
service
disruption.
Please
visit
our
kovic
19
webpage.
A
So
we'll
go
first
colic
with
the
with
the
consent
agenda
and
then
we'll
we'll
have
our
delegation
first.
So.
A
Declaration
of
interest,
I
see
none
confirmation
of
minute
minutes,
16
minute
meetings
of
september
3rd
2020
of
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
on
the
minutes.
Okay,
great
okay,
item
number
one:
it
was
postponed
and
deferral.
So
item
number
one.
Is
the
engineers
report,
a
branch
number
four
wilson,
johnson
municipal
drain,
that
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
recommend
that
council
adopt
the
engineer's
report
prepared
by
rob?
A
A
A
Oh
yes,
because
that
I
can
yes
you're
right
mark,
because
item
number
one
is
a
mla
project
which
is
what's
added
on
after
okay,
so
we'll
follow.
A
Do
we
have
any
question
anyone
speaking
on
this
item
mark
we
have
no,
no
one
sign
to
speak.
Correct!
No
speakers,
no
speaker
on
the
item.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Item
number.
Three
is
briefing
on
planning
and
development
charge
aspect
of
bill,
197,
kovic,
19
economic
recovery
act,
2020
and
that's
the
item
that
council
me
was
asking
about.
A
Does
the
committee
wish
to
have
a
presentation?
Because,
on
the
planning
committee,
where
I
sit
on
with
the
three
of
my
colleagues
card
and
plan,
we
didn't
have
enough
information
to
have
a
presentation
at
the
time,
but
now
it
seems
are
legal
willing
to
do
a
presentation
on
this.
So
should
we
hold
this
item
for
presentation,
I
see
acknowledging
that
okay,
so
we'll
hold
item
number
three
and
we'll
come
back
to
it
after.
A
Thank
you
changes
to
the
definition
of
a
minor
rezoning
application
type.
A
B
A
Thank
you.
Zoning
by
law,
amendment
part
of
2974
shea
road.
The
agricultural
affair
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw.
A
2008-2504
part
of
2974
shea
road
for
the
purpose
of
pre-zoning,
a
portion
of
the
lands
from
agriculture
a.g
to
agriculture,
subzone
5
hg5,
to
prohibit
residential
use
on
the
retained
farmland.
As
detailed
in
document
2.
and
item
number
2,
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
brief
explanation.
This
is
another
surplus
formula
on
the
item
very.
B
A
Another
similar
item
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
4960
cannon
smith,
drive
item
number
one,
that
agricultural
rule
affair
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zone
and
bylaw
2008-250
for
part
of
4960
cannon
smith;
drive
for
the
purpose
of
re-zoning,
a
portion
of
the
land
from
agriculture,
hg
aeg
agriculture,
sub-zone
for
hg4
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
the
retained
farmland.
As
detailed
in
document
two
and
item
number
two
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
brief
explanation
on
the
item.
B
A
Item
number
one
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008-2504
part
of
3964,
john
charles
road
for
the
purpose
of
rezoning.
The
lands
from
agriculture
zone
ag
to
agricultural
zone
subzone
5
hg5
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
the
retained
farmland,
as
detailed
in
document
2
and
item
number
two.
That
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
approve
the
consultation
detail.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
pre-explanation
on
the
item.
A
Okay:
item
number:
eight
economic
development
on
long-range
planning,
city
of
ottawa;
zoning
bylaw,
2008-250
amendment
bus
amendment,
q3
2020..
At
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee,
the
command
council
approved
an
amendment
to
zoning
by
law.
A
2008-250,
as
shown
in
document
one
in
detail
in
document
three
and
four:
that's
that's
an
amendment
bus
amendment.
Can
we
carry
this.
A
For
maybe
don
herrwire,
I'm
a
car
john.
Are
you
on
a
call.
E
Sure
it's
just
obviously
there's
a
number
of
things
in
here:
some
stuff
for
foul
field,
road
and
mansfield
road.
There's
one
other
thing,
and
I
I
could
ask
elsewhere,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
here:
it's
just
a
it's
with
regard
to
the
lear
that
we
did
a
few
years
ago
and
some
changes
along
mansfield,
road
and
bleaks
2016.
Four
years
later,
those
changes
still
haven't
haven't
occurred.
B
So,
just
to
clarify
your
question
counselor,
you
said
waiting
for
the
op.
Did
you
mean
waiting
for
the
new,
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
versus.
E
That's
just
it
right,
so
they
are
already
in
the
old
piece.
So
you're
right
it
would
be
the
comprehensive
zoning
by
law.
So
that
could
be
two
three
four
years
away
and
we've
already
been
waiting
four
years
from
the
council
decision
on
zoning
as
it
stands,
which
impacts
for
severances
and
stuff.
Like
that
sure.
B
Mitchell,
I'm
not
sure
if
you're
aware
of
this
one,
if
not,
we
can
look
into
that
and
get
back
to
you
on
possible
timing.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
idea
all
right,
thanks
guys,
okay,.
A
Okay,
so
can
we
carry
the
item
and
staff
can
provide
us
with
more
explanation?
A
Okay,
great
thank
you
very
much
item
number
nine
zone
and
bylaw
amendment
to
permit
reduced
parking
rate
for
the
large-scale
warehouse
and
industrial
building,
and
that's
a
city-wide
that
the
agricultural
rural
affairs
committee
recommend
that
council
won
a
proven
amendment
to
section
101
of
zoning
bylaw
2008-2504
warehouse,
light
industrial,
heavy
industrial
and
technology
industry,
minimum
parking
rate,
as
detailed
in
document.
One
item
number
two:
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
pre-explanation
on
item
number:
nine:
okay,
great.
Okay,
thank.
A
You
item
number
10:
that's
amendment
to
the
engineers
report,
john
taylor,
municipal
drain,
realignment
and
modification
in
breeder
gubern
that
the
agricultural
rural
affairs
committee
recommend
that
council
adopt
the
engineers
report
prepared
by
robinson
consultants,
inc
in
title
engineers,
report
john
taylor,
municipal
drain,
realignment
and
modification
dated
august
2020
and
gave
first
and
second
reading
to
the
bylaw
attached
as
document
2
to
this
report
in
accordance
with
1642
and
45
of
the
drainage
act
of
ontario
on
the
item.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
now
we
will
go
to
our
first.
A
I
think,
mr
clerk,
I
don't
think
I
read
the
chair
statement
for
republic
here
and
for
op
and
zone
and
I
think
so
maybe
I
should
read
it
now.
A
Yeah,
the
zoom
meeting,
unfortunately,
sorry
folks,
shared
statement,
republic
hearing
for
op
and
zone
and
item
this
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
listed
as
item
4
to
9
on
today's
agenda.
A
For
the
item
just
mentioned,
only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
appeal
tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applica
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
appeals
tribunal.
If
council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
90
days
of
recipient
of
the
application
for
zoning
120
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
to
submit
written
comment
on
these
amendments
prior
to
their
consideration
by
the
city
council
on
october
14th,
please
email
or
call
the
committee
or
council
coordinator.
A
So
that's
the
chairs
statement,
so
we
do
have.
We
do
have
a
public
delegation
to
do
a
presentation
on
emily
project.
I
received
this
request
from
the
ofa
in
in
my
area
and
they
do
have
a
power
presentation
and
I'd
like
to
dab
before
you.
You
do
your
presentation
give
the
committee
small.
A
D
Hi
thanks
very
much
it's
nice
to
see
everybody.
I
think
the
the
powerpoint
actually
will
explain
the
project
pretty
well
as
we
go
along.
So
if
we
want
to
just
jump
right
into
that,
I
think
that
would
be
good.
D
Okay,
so
next
slide
please
so
the
emily
project
was
initiated
in
2017
by
the
family
of
emily
trudeau.
Emily
was
critically
injured
in
a
farm
accident
at
a
second
farm,
no
buildings
and
no
911
on
the
property.
Her
family
called
9-1-1,
but
the
first
responders
couldn't
find
the
field
and
actually
drove
by
it
that
day
and
emily
subsequently
passed
away
from
her
injuries.
D
So
this
is
the
trudeau
family.
They
felt
they
needed
to
do
something
to
prevent
this
from
happening
again
to
another
farm
family,
so
they
initiated
this
project
and
put
together
a
committee
in
hastings
county
and
the
project
officially
launched
in
2017
at
the
hastings
county.
Plowing
match
next
slide.
D
D
I
know
both
our
empire
region,
federation
of
agriculture
and
ottawa
federation
of
agriculture
are
interested
in
committing
some
money
to
start
the
project
off,
offering
it
to
members
for
the
first
100
members
that
want
to
sign
up
for
signs
they're
going
to
offer
a
an
amount
of
money
to
discount
the
signs
to
the
members,
and
it
also
works
to
promote
the
programs
to
landowners
by
helping
them
understand
how
to
contact
emergency
services
efficiently.
D
So
whether
that's
teaching
farmers
to
have
a
phone
charger
in
every
tractor
or
go
through
an
emergency
plan
with
a
new
employee
just
so
that,
when
you're
put
in
an
emergency
situation,
people
know
what
to
do
and
how
to
do
it
quickly.
Next
slide,
as
I
mentioned,
the
official
launch
was
august
23rd
2017.
D
D
If
a
farmer
is
looking
for
it,
they
search
fund
farm
911,
the
emily
project
they
come
here
and
every
municipality
that
has
decided
to
participate
in
the
program.
Their
orders
are
taken
off
this
website.
D
D
There's
15
municipalities
currently
participating,
I
believe
it's
nine
counties
and
six
individual
municipalities
across
the
province.
It
has
gained
a
lot
of
momentum
in
the
last
year.
Covent
has
certainly
slowed
it
down
a
bit
as
people
kind
of
regroup,
but
we're
starting
to
see
a
really
good
uptake
across
the
province
next
slide
and
that's
my
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
it
today.
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
deb
for
your
presentation
and,
if
I
can
say
thank
you
to
also
our
members
of
the
ofa
in
in
ottawa
and
prior
who
reached
out
to
us
about
the
emily
project
and
we
did
a
little
bit
of
work
with
our
staff
deb
and
I
believe
our
municipal
addressing
team
with
the
building
code
service
can
assign
civic
address
for
property
which
do
not
currently
have
one.
They
have
generic
email
addresses
and
and
it's
addressing,
and
we
can
provide
all
this
to
you.
A
I
reach
out
to
richard
ash
from,
and
we
got
a
pricing
on
those
those
sign
at
the
911
and
post
and
post
install.
If
it's
installed
by
the
city
is
a
94
911
replacement,
blade,
sign
and
post
still
94
and
that's
installed
by
the
city.
A
replacement,
blade
and
post
installed
by
the
owner
or
slash
developer
is
57
and
911
replacement.
Blade
sign
only
is
32
dollars
so
and
there's
no
additional
cost.
We
can
email
you
all
that
information
we
have.
A
You
can
share
it
with
your
member
and
and
now
will
open
it
to
my
colleague.
If
any
question
about,
or
from
deb
or
more
explanation
on
emily's
project
is,
it
was
quite
quite
a
bit
on
roma
rural
municipality
of
ontario.
They
spoke
about
this
and
the
need
for
farmer
to
to
basically
to
install
those
911
sign.
I
know
the
city
of
ottawa.
A
They
have
gps
technology
on
a
fire
truck
and
can
identify
property,
even
if
they
don't
have
the
blade
on
it,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
every
municipality
or
small
rural
municipality
in
ontario
have
that
technology,
but
also
it's
helpful
for
anyone
to
to
have
those
those
plate
signs
on
their
farm
gate,
especially
now
the
farm
are
hundreds
if
it's
not
thousands
of
acres.
So
anyway,
we'll
open
the
question
to
my
colleague.
I
didn't
see
any
hand
raid,
but
it's
anyone.
Oh
sorry,
councillor
moffat.
E
Yeah
thanks
for
this
and
thanks
deb
for
bringing
us.
I
know
that
you
actually
reached
out
to
us
last
year
about
this
in
2019
and
I
had
spoken
previously.
I
think
you
know
probably
some
twitter
exchanges
with
jeannie
and
frazier
who
used
to
live
in
val
field
now
lives,
I
believe,
over
in
southern
ontario.
E
E
It
was
just
a
comment
to
build
on
kind
of
what
eli
was
saying
that
different
musicalities
do
have
different
different
factors
when
it
comes
to
this
I
mean
I
actually
think
this
is
a
good
program
and
I
would
no
opposition
to
anyone
wanting
to
do
this,
but
just
from
the
effectiveness,
the
necessity
of
it
in
ottawa.
So
it
just
sort
of
says,
common
cell
providers
always
advise
us
of
which
cell
tower
received
the
call.
E
The
call
is
most
often
triangulated
off
multiple
cell
towers,
and
it
gives
them
a
degree
of
accuracy
to
that
location.
In
some
cases
it
states
within
three
meters
of
that
location
other
times
it
might
state
2000
meters,
that
location,
a
larger
variance
is
often
attributed
to
taller
apartment
buildings
or
nearby
hills.
E
If
we
can't
locate
a
caller,
we
can
request
in
most
cases
that
they
look
at
their
satellite
fix
on
a
mapping
tool
on
the
caller's
cell
phone,
which
is
often
very
accurate,
so
the
opinion
of-
and
this
was
andrew
orchard,
who
is
the
program
manager
with
paramedic
services?
His
opinion
is
that
the
suggested
feature
would
be
very
rarely
used,
as
we
have
not
experienced
trouble
locating
callers
within
the
ottawa
boundaries.
I
see
this
having
more
value
in
more
remote
areas
where
there
is
only
one
cell
tower
and
no
ability
to
triangulate
a
collar.
E
E
That
said,
I
think,
there's
also
there's
always
value
in
from
even
just
a
resident
perspective
when
you're
making
a
call
to
be
able
to
give
that
nearest
address.
We
just
had
one
last
a
couple
weeks
ago,
a
farm
accident
and
the
sharing
of
the
most
of
the
nearest
address
actually
led
to
confusion
in
the
community.
They
thought
it
was.
E
It
was
another
property
that
had
already
experienced
quite
a
significant
tragedy
from
a
farming
accident
a
few
years
ago,
just
by
that
that
misrepresentation
of
the
address,
so
it
so
there
are
there
are
there-
are
certainly
benefits.
I
know
at
least
in
in
ottawa's
case
we
haven't
had
issues
when
it
comes
to
locating
folks,
based
on
the
lack
of
address
signs.
But
again
you
know
no
opposition
in
my
mind
of
of
actually
offering
those
signs
to
make
sure
if
people
want
those
that
they
can
put
those
up.
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
for
you,
and
thank
you
very
much
deb
for
your
great
presentation,
and
I
know
that
this
is
very
important
initiative.
I
know
myself
and
counselor
strengthening
in
the
last
term.
He
we
work
very
closely
with
the
theory
of
arawa,
specifically
an
osgood
ward,
because
back
in
amalgamation
before
sorry,
not
magnification
back
in
the
ice
storm.
B
The
province
gave
money
for
farmer,
because
after
this
incident
we
had
the
loss
of
deficiency
and
9-1-1
calls
that
people
and
volunteer
could
not
be
able
to
reach
the
proper
farm
because
of
not
proper
efficiency.
911
blade
sign
at
that
time,
redrock
auburn
and
the
west
carton
and
the
gloucester
area.
They
actually
replaced
their
signs
with
aluminum,
911
blade
and
as
good
at
that
time.
Unfortunately,
they
used
the
metal
one
and
and
what
happened
is
with
the
snow,
clearing
and
the
wing
when
the
snow
plow
goes
by
the
combo
trucks
they
were.
B
Salt
was
hitting
those
9-1-1
and
they
were
all
rusty.
So
we
were
able,
with
the
help
of
my
colleague
an
era
last
term
we
were
able
to
allocate
some
funds
and
we
changed
all
the
911
blades
and
they
were
free.
We
distribute
them
to
every
major
road
and
as
good
words
to
be
able
to
follow
the
lead
of
riddle
corbin
and
was
carlton
at
that
time
with
aluminum.
So
I
want
to
thank
you.
B
This
is
very
important
initiative
and
I
support
the
chair
on
anything
that
we
need
to
help
with
with
this
initiative,
because
it's
great
and
it's
safe.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
council
de
roos.
So
what
deb?
You
heard
our
support
for
this.
I
just
want
to
add
a
little
bit
to
what
council
moffatt
was
saying
and
sometimes
counselor.
The
cell
phone
itself
is
not
good
enough,
because
if
they
are
the
nearest
tower
and
it
happened
couple
accidents
in
on
the
ottawa
river
and
when
the
caller
called
the
car
got
picked
up
by
gatineau,
and
we
have
some
challenge
with
with
the
language
barrier
to
to
explain
the
accident.
A
So
again,
it
is,
is
a
small
cost
to
the
farmer
quite
honestly
to
to
provide
that
extra
extra
safety
feature
to
speak
and
and
for
all
the
investment.
Our
farmers.
Don't
trust
me.
This
will
be
one
of
the
the
smallest
investment
in
the
plate
and
the
city
is
willing
to
help
and
work
out
with
the
udep.
A
So
we'll
send
you
all
the
information
and
the
address
in
ottawa
ca,
and
so
you
can
provide
it
to
all
your
member
and
if
they
wish
to
follow
through,
I
will
give
you
a
list
of
the
cost
as
well.
So
with
that
can
we
receive
deb
is
a
presentation
for
the
record
well,
thank
you
very
much.
Deb
really
appreciate
you
being
here
with
us
today.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
so
now
college
will
go
to
to
a
health
item
which
is
a
briefing
on
planning
and
development
charges,
aspect
of
bill,
197
and
garrett.
I
know
some
of
us,
the
vice
chair
and
council
moffitt
myself
on
the
planning
committee,
but
I
think
I'd
like
to
start
from
the
beginning,
because
some
of
my
colleagues
do
not
sit
on
planet
committee.
So
if
you
can
take
us
back
to
the
beginning
of
this
bill,
we'll
be.
C
Certainly,
mr
chair
there's
been
a
great
deal
of
legislation.
That's
come
out
of
the
province
in
the
last
year
or
year
and
a
half
so
wouldn't
blame
anyone
for
not
needing
a
refresher.
I
have
a
presentation
if
it
looks
like
that's
being
brought
up
right
now,
perfect.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
as.
C
Mr
chair,
the
the
presentation
today
is
on
bill
197,
which
is
the
covid
19
economic
recovery
act
and
next
slide.
Please.
C
Actually
came
into
force
on
september
18
2020
very
recently,
this
report,
what
came
before
iraq
and
planning
committee
earlier,
however,
at
the
time
it
went
to
planning
committee,
the
regulations.
B
C
Out
it
was
before
september
18th,
so
the
provisions
also
weren't
in
force,
so
this
presentation
has
been
updated
to
ensure
that
it
has
the
latest
information,
including
the
information
from
the
regulations,
so
to
the
extent
that
there's
anything
new
in
this,
it
won't
be
reflected
in
the
report
that
was
previously
issued.
It
will
be
reflected
in
this
presentation.
C
C
So
most
notably
bill
of
108
dealt
with
repealing
section
37
bonusing
and
replacing
it
with
a
community
benefits
charge
which
is
a
similar
to
a
development
charge
we'll
get
into
that
more
later,
and
it
also
had
some
provisions
dealing
with
parkland
so
that
later
on
on
june,
21st
2019
regulations
came
out
related
to
bill
108
december
10
2019
some
bill
138
came
out,
and
that
was
making
some
tweaks
to
the
bill.
108
proposal.
C
C
This
basically
reversed
some
of
the
changes
in
bill
108
and
kept
some
and
that's
what
we'll
be
addressing
today
and
on
september,
18.
All
of
the
bill
108
and
bill
197
provisions
that
are
relevant
to
us
today
from
a
planning
and
development.
C
C
C
That's
what
section
37
did
permit
that
has
been
now
repealed
under
the
proposal
under
bill
108
and
then,
as
amended
by
bill
197
section
35,
7
bylaws
will
remain
in
force
for
a
period
of
time
until
either
we
enact
a
community
benefits
charge
by
law
or
or
a
specified
date.
Actually,
the
section
37
by
law
will
continue
after
that
specified
date.
C
We
just
can
no
longer
enact
a
new
section
37
by
law,
so
the
municipality
will
have
to
the
city
will
have
to
consider
how
it
will
deal
with
the
section
37
height
and
density
bonusing
versus
enacting
a
new
community
benefits
charge.
A
C
I'll
get
into
more
specifics
about
the
community
benefits
charge
by
law
and
its
utility
in
a
minute,
once
the
section
37
bylaw
does
expire,
any
reserve
funds
will
be
transferred
into
the
general
capital
reserve,
but
it
will
still
be
dedicated
to
the
same
purpose
for
which
it
was
dedicated,
which
is
a
community
benefit.
C
Community
benefits
charges,
so
this
is
the
new
provision
that
came
into
effect.
It
was
first
proposed
under
bill.
108
bill
197,
substantially
changed
what
a
community
benefits
charge
can
be
applied
to
community
benefits.
Charges
are
now
much
more
limited.
They
can
only
apply
to
high
density
residential
development,
so
that
is
defined
as
a
residential
development
consisting
of
ten
or
more
residential
units
and
five
or
more
stories.
It
has
to
have
both
so.
C
B
C
Narrow
range
of
development
that
a
community
benefits
charge
can
be
applied
to
the
what
the
community
benefits
charge
can
be
in
respect
to
is
fairly
broadly
stated.
C
It
can
be
applied
to
any
capital
costs
related
to
development
in
the
area
to
which
the
community
benefits
charge
applies,
it's
a
similar
definition
to
what
the
development
charge
could
be
applied
for
previously,
and
it's
not
limited.
There's
no
specific
types
of
services
that
can't
be
collected
through
community
benefits
charges.
They
do
have
to,
however,
be
tied
to
a
development
in
the
community
benefits
charge
area
and
that
question
of
whether
it's
tied
to
development
should
be
justified
through
the
community
benefits
charge
strategy,
which
is
similar
to
a
development
charge.
C
C
It
has
fewer
specific
requirements
in
the
development
charges
act,
so
the
development
charges
act
has
very
specific
regulations
about
what
goes
into
a
background
study
and
how
the
various
inputs
are
calculated.
The
community
benefits
charge
bylaw.
We
have
the
regulation
now.
It
doesn't
provide
quite
as
much
detail
as
the
development
charges
by
law.
Background
study
provisions
do
we
still
have
to
articulate
what
growth
we're
anticipating.
B
C
C
So
development
charges
the
amendments
also
came
into
force
in
september
2020.
The
gentleman
charges
act
has
been
changed
under
the
old
development
charges
act.
The
services
which
were
eligible
to
be
collected
through
development
charges
were
not
specifically
listed.
B
C
C
C
The
regulations
were
proposed
later
on
in
the
process
added
some
of
these
items
to
the
list
so
over
time.
As
the
as
the
list
developed,
it
got
closer
to
the
bill
197
list,
but
the
bill
197
list
ultimately
is
bigger
than
what
was
under
108..
C
A
C
C
B
C
Can't
charge
for
the
acquisition
of
land
for
parks,
but
we
we
can
charge
for
the
acquisition
of
land
for
recreation
services,
so
community
centers,
rec
centers,
that
kind
of
thing
we
can
collect
development
charges
for
paying
for
acquisition
of
land
for
a
rec
center.
C
B
C
In
force
for
two
years
until
september,
18,
2022
or
until
council
decides
to
elect
to
enact
a
community
benefits
charge
by
law,
whichever
is
sooner,
and
so
after
that
two-year
period,
any
development
charges
which
are
no
longer
legal
in
accordance
with
the
new
bill.
197
list
would
not
be
enforceable,
but
it
doesn't
appear
based
on
my
initial
review,
that
there
are
any
specific
development
charges
that
ottawa
is
collecting.
C
Now
that
wouldn't
be
permissible
under
the
new
list,
so
it
probably
won't
affect
us,
but
it's
something
that
staff
should
take
a
look
at
before
the
two-year
period
is
up.
The
next
slide.
Please.
C
Finally,
well
there's
two
more
two
more
main
points.
First,
parkland
dedication:
this
is
significant
bill.
1
108
had
initially
proposed
to
repeal
the
parkland
dedication
power
of
the
municipality
bill.
197
reverses
bill
108,
where
now
we
continue
to
be
able
to
have
a
parkland
dedication
by
law.
C
The
the
one
catch
is
that
the
current
act,
and
as
amended
as
well
continues
to
allow
us
to
collect
an
alternative
rate.
An
alternative
rate
in
the
act
is
calculated
on
the
basis
of
it
basically
applies
to
high
density
residential
and
we
would
apply
a
rate
of
one
hectare
per
300
units
for
dedication
of
of
parkland
and
there's
a
different
rate
for
cash
in
lieu
as
well.
That
is
an
alternative
to
the
easier
way
of
calculating
it,
which
is
based
on
a
percentage
of
land.
C
C
If
we
want
to
continue
to
use
that
alternative
rate
provision
we'll
have
to
reenact
our
parkland
dedication
bylaw
before
then,
if
we
want
to
continue
to
do
that,
and
that
also
will
open
our
bylaw
up
to
an
appeal,
the
appeal
would
be
limited
to
an
argument
about
the
appropriateness
of
the
alternative
rate
and
it
would
be
open
for
any
any
affected
person
in
the
municipality
to
appeal.
C
So
this
basically
is
a
mechanism
that
allowed
our
bilat
to
come
open
to
appeal,
even
though
it's
been
enacted
for
a
long
time
and
our
deadline
for
that
is
again
september.
18
2022.
C
Finally,
the
minister
has
power
under
section
47
of
the
act
to
issue
orders
under
the
old
act.
The
minister
could
issue
orders
with
respect
to
zoning
or
subdivision
approvals.
The
bill
197
permitted
the
minister
also
the
power
to
issue
orders
with
respect
to
site
plan
approval
under
the
new
provision.
The
minister
can
effectively
exempt
a
property
from
municipal
approval
of
site
plan
and
direct
that
site
plan
b,
be
approved
by
the
minister
on
terms
dictated
by
the
minister.
C
The
municipality
still
would
enter
into
the
agreement
the
site
plan
agreement,
but
the
minister's
conditions
would
have
to
be
in
the
agreement.
This
hasn't
been
used
in
ottawa
very
frequently.
If,
at
all,
to
my
knowledge,
I
do
know
that
the
minister's
orders
have
been
issued
more
frequently
in
the
greater
toronto
area.
So
it's
unclear
whether
this
would
be
something
that
will
be
stating
more
in
ottawa
or
if
it's
mostly
going
to
be
relevant
to
the
gta.
C
So
that
is
my
presentation.
Obviously
a
lot
going
on
with
the
legislation
right
now
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
that
arise
from
this
and
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
again
for
your
presentation.
I
don't
see
any
hands,
maybe
my
caller
will
raise
that
hand
now
question
for
you
when
you
talk
about
minister,
can
make
that
decision.
So
it's
the
minister's
decision.
Can
that
be
appeal
or
that's
not
appealable.
C
Issue
an
order
that
would
be
a
regulation
to
the
planning
act
we've
seen
in
the
last
year.
There
have
been
about
I'd,
say
about
a
dozen
or
so
of
those
orders
in
the
gta
area.
Like
hamilton
toronto.
I
think
some
appeal,
so
I
haven't
seen
any
in
ottawa,
yet
that.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair
yeah.
This
is
really
quite
involved,
isn't
it
I
guess
the
I
guess
the
first
question
I'd
just
like
an
explainer
on
is
how
do
you
envision
the
changes
to
the
dc
law
when,
in
terms
of
the
percentage
of
parkland
right
now,
it
is
based
on
on
a
percentage
of
of
the
density?
D
Now
it's
going
to
be
quite
specific
one
hectare
per
100
units.
If
I
understand
that
correctly
many
of
the
plans
that
we
don't
really,
how
can
we
actually
determine
if
how
this
is
going
to
affect
us?
I
guess
in
essence,
will
we
see
smaller
parks
in
the
future,
or
will
this
actually
have
a
benefit?
A
higher
density
will
will
require
greater
parkland.
C
So
I
don't
I
thank
you
for
the
question
and
through
you,
mr
chair,
I
don't
have.
I
don't
anticipate
that
this
will
change
our
ability
to
collect
parkland.
Our
current
bylaw
remains
in
force
to
be
clear
for
at
least
the
next
two
years
we
currently
under
our
current
bylaw
have
this
alternative
rate
which
I've
been
referring
to
it,
as
we
have
one
rate
for
residential
development
that
is
just
based
on
a
percentage
of
the
land
or,
if
they're,
doing
cash
and
loots
it's
the
value
of
that
land.
C
My
reflection
is
it's
five
percent,
and
then
we
have
an
alternative
rate
which
currently
applies.
That
is
based
it's
for
higher
density,
residential
development,
so
we're
building
a
condo
or
a
apartment
tower
that
kind
of
thing.
That
rate
will
apply
currently
on
it's
one
hectare
per
300
units,
correct,
yes
and
then
there's
a
separate
rate.
C
That
also
applies
it's
a
slightly
a
different
rate
that
applies
when
you're
doing
cash
and
moo
versus
dedication
that
one
per
300
is
for
dedication
of
the
land
itself
on
on
the
property
for
a
park
when
you're
doing
cash
in
lieu
of
dedicating
land.
It's
one
per
500
units.
D
D
So
how
how
do
we
envision
it
going
forward
because
we
are
trying
to
increase
density?
Certainly,
you
know
around
the
transit
lines
and
things
like
that.
C
Anticipated
to
change
unless,
unless
we
get
some
other
direction
from
council,
what
the
the
change
in
the
legislation
does
is
allow
a
developer
to
appeal
our
rate
at
some
point
when
we
reenact
it
in
the
next
two
years.
C
C
Grounds
they
would
have
to
really
appeal
to
be
honest,
but
we
could
try
to
see
we
could
see
an
illegal
cost
associated
with
fighting
those
appeals
in
terms
of
how
it
will
change
incentives
for
developers.
C
I
don't
I'm
not
aware
of
any
suggesting
that
we're
going
to
change
our
rate,
and
so
it
should
continue
to
be
the
same
rate,
which
is
what
developers
are
aware
of
and
building
in
accordance
with
now.
D
The
but
the
intent
of
these
changes
really
is
to
allow
developers
to
allow
speed
up
to
speed
up
and
take
some
of
the
barriers
to
housing
development
away.
So
overall,
would
you
say
that
this
is
good
for
us,
or
would
you
say
that
you
know
we're
we're
gonna?
This
will
be
a
little
bit
more
problematic
and
in
the
way
that
we
we
development
is
allowed
yeah.
D
C
Legislation
that
we've
been
talking
about
is
to
reduce
barriers
to
housing
development.
I
think
the
the
changes
we're
seeing
in
bill
197
overall
are
favorable
to
the
municipality.
They
kind
of
take
into
account
some
of
the
comments
that
the
province
had
had
received
to
bill
108,
which
we
had.
We
had
comments
from
counsel
and
staff
as
well
on
those,
and
so
I
think.
B
C
Take
into
account
some
of
those
changes,
it
gives
us
the
flexibility
we
need
under
development
charges,
for
instance,
to
to
continue
to
collect
what
we're
collecting
and
the
community
benefits
charge
has
been
reduced
in
importance
which,
which
honestly
is
makes
sense
from.
D
C
So
we
they
there's
not
a
suggestion
that
the
minister
could
enact
a
committee
benefits
charge
for
us.
We
we
do
have
when
we
enact
the
community
benefits
charge
by
law,
our
authority
to
collect
our
section.
37
bonusing
goes
away.
We
have
to
it's
one
or
the
other,
so
we'll.
C
D
Okay,
that's
it
for
me
thanks
garrett,
okay,
thanks.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
meehan,
any
other
question.
I
don't
see
any
hand
raising.
Oh
council
market
go
ahead,
counselor.
E
Thanks
just
briefly,
I
think
I
mean
I
think,
garrett
sort
of
summed
it
up
there.
There
were
some.
There
are
certain
bills
that
come
out
of
the
province,
regardless
of
which
government
it
is,
I
think,
of
bill
181
with
some
election
changes
back
in
in
2016,
but
certainly
bill.
108
was
confounding
from
a
municipal
governance
perspective
and
saying
well:
did
anyone
even
consult
municipalities
on
a
bill
like
this?
E
It
was
the
same
with
bill
181
it
it's
almost
as
though
the
people
who
write
these
bills
don't
actually
know
anything
about
the
444
municipalities
in
the
province
of
ontario.
So
I
think
bill
won
any
set.
197
helps
to
correct,
regardless
of
covid.
This
needed
to
happen.
If,
if
they
want
to
use
covet
as
a
as
a
cover
for
for
amending
bill
108,
then
then
so
be
it
I'm
fine
with
it.
But
those
changes
needed
to
happen
because
they
weren't
they
were
detrimental
to
the
operation
of
a
municipality.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
moffat.
I
see
no
other
hand.
Thank
you
very
much
gail
for
your
presentation.
Don
I
saw
you
earlier.
Do
you
have
something
you
want
to
add
to
what
garrett
for
saying
down
here,
wire
or
you're
good.
B
No,
I
I
think
garrett
and
counselor
moffat
have
captured
it.
The
excuse
me,
the
changes
made
in
terms
of
the
parkland
dedication
were
something
the
municipality
was
seeking
and
just
want
to
say
that
we
will
be
moving
to
a
new
bylaw.
So
look
for
that
in
the
next
two.
A
Years
and
a
question
gary
two
or
dawn
is
september,
22nd
2022
is
is
that
date
can
be
advanced
because,
as
as
you
know
that
year
with
with
the
big
e
in
it,
so.
B
Yeah,
I
know
thank
you
for
the
question,
mr
chair.
I
know
it's
on
our
work
plan
for
2021,
so
I
would
expect
we
would
be
delivering
that
in
advance
of
that
time
frame.
A
A
Okay,
so
can
we
receive
the
item
item
three
no
word.
Thank
you
very
much
folks,
thank
you
and
thank
you
again
garrett
for
your
presentation
that
will
conclude
our
held
item.
A
We
have
no
one
to
speak
inquiries
and
inquiries
other
business
for
some
of
my
colleagues.
We
will
be
adjourning
from
iraq
momentarily,
but
we
will
reconvene
under
the
court
of
revision.
I'm
not
sure
if
all
my
colleagues
like
to
stay
but
they're
welcome
to
stay,
but
we
need
at
least
three
of
us
to
be
on
the
next
item.
A
So
with
that
the
next
meeting
is
thursday
november.
The
5th
now
need
a
motion
to
adjourn
from
era.
A
There's
a
statement
to
be
read
here
by
the
chair
of
the
court
of
revision.
At
the
beginning
of
the
hearing
on
october,
1st
2020
for
the
printing
ball
municipal
drain
for
the
purpose
of
hearing
appeals
under
section
52
of
the
drainage
act
by
owners
of
land
assessed
for
drainage
works
under
the
engineers
report
for
the
renjimbal
municipal
drain
and
title
court
of
revision,
amendment
to
the
engineers
report
for
the
rinjan
paul
municipal
drain,
dated
february
2020.
This
court
will
now
convene
for
the
first
setting
of
the
court
of
revision
under
section
46
of
drainage
act.
A
The
following
appeal
has
been
received
by
the
city.
Clerk
dave
ryan.
Is
the
city
of
ottawa,
a
drainage
engineer
any
owner
a
flat
assessed
under
the
engineer's
report,
who
has
not
provided
written
notice
of
appeal
to
the
clerk
in
advance
of
this
should
identify
themselves
with
the
clerk
assistant
at
this
time
with
a
request
to
be
heard.
A
Mr
desjardins,
to
my
knowledge,
you
have
no
one
sign
up
to
speak
on
on
this
item.
My
cura.
A
Okay
and
dave
brown
is
the
city,
drainage,
superintendent,.
B
A
A
Okay,
so
any
question
from
my
colleague
to
mr
ryan:
no,
I
see
none
so
mark
we,
we
have
to
read
the
other
statement,
rendering
a
decision
is
that
correct
dave
at
this
point.
That's
correct.
B
A
Chair,
okay,
so
any
question
from
carly
no
at
the
conclusion
of
the
hearing
of
the
appeal
has
been
granted
to
the
court
has
decided
that
there
shall
be
a
change
to
the
assessment,
slash
assessment,
slash
assessment
schedule.
As
stated
in
the
engineers
report,
then
the
chair
may
wish
to
state
the
following.
This
court
adopted
the
following
update
to
the
assessment
schedules
in
the
engineers
report
dated
february
2020.
A
Our
reference
to
the
roll
number
associated
with
the
parcel
152
shall
be
corrected.
Two
five:
zero:
zero:
three:
zero
one:
five:
five:
four:
zero:
zero:
zero:
zero,
zero
zero.
The
decision
rendered
by
the
court
maybe
appear
to
the
agriculture
food
and
rural
affair
appeal
tribunal
within
21
days
of
today
october,
1st
2020.
A
613-580-2424
extension
25008
with
that
the
court
adjourned
at
the
conclusion
of
the.
If
his
no
appeal
has
been
filed
or
if
appeal
had
been
filed,
the
court
has
decided
there
shall
be
no
changes
to
the
assessment.
As
stated
in
the
engineer's
report
and
the
sheriff
stated,
the
following:
this
court
adopt
the
assessment
in
engineers
report
dated
february
2020.
A
All
right,
so
with
that
we
are
good,
mr
ryan,
because
we
were
told
the
last
time
we
were
going
too
fast,
so
it
tried
to
slow
down
as
much
as
possible.
Have
we
missed
anything.
B
Not
to
my
knowledge,
mr
chair,
there's,
nobody
we've
received
no
appeals
and
just
other
than
that
minor
corrections.
So
we
should
be.
This
is
the
amazon
site.
Basically,
the
costs
are
being
paid
by
them.
So
it's
by
the
amazon.
A
So
with
with
that
again,
if
someone
need
a
sample
of
appeal
notice,
they
can
call
the
city
of
ottawa
number
613-580-2424
extension
25-0
with
that
the
court
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
folks
and
have
a
great
long
weekend
in
in
october,
and
our
next
meeting
will
be
november
5th
happy
thanksgiving
everyone.
E
That
was
a
lot
shorter
than
our
our
last
quarter.
Revision.