►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Committee - February 14, 2023
Description
Built Heritage Committee
Date: Monday, February 13, 2023
A
Good
morning,
everybody
and
welcome
to
the
built
Heritage
committee
meeting
of
February
14
2023
Happy
Valentine's
Day
I'd,
like
to
call
the
members
to
order.
This
hybrid
meeting
is
being
is
being
held
on
the
traditional
territory
of
the
Algonquin
Anderson
of
a
Nation,
the
original
custodians
of
the
unseated
land
in
which
the
city
of
Ottawa
is
located.
We
extend
our
respect
to
all
First
Nations,
Inuit
and
metis
people
for
their
valuable
past
and
present
contributions
to
this
land.
A
Please
use
the
microphone
in
front
of
you
and
keep
your
computer
muted
I
will
provide
each
Committee
Member
with
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
or
comments
on
each
item
in
the
order
in
which
they
raise
their
hand
in
Zoom
for
panelists
the
raise
hand
option
is
found
at
the
bottom
of
the
participants
list
for
those
calling
in
please
press
star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
the
committee
coordinator
and
I
will
be
watching
for
those
cues.
A
Members
are
also
reminded
to
submit
any
motions,
visual
supports
or
Declaration
of
interest
in
writing
to
the
coordinator
at
their
earliest
opportunity.
Although
the
deadlines
have
passed
for
residents
to
register
to
speak
and
provide
written
submissions
to
this
committee,
you
can
still
make
written
commission
submissions
to
council.
All
reports
considered
today
will
be
submitted
to
Ottawa
city
council
on
February,
2nd
2023..
A
C
D
A
Thank
you.
So
much
are
there
any
Declarations
of
Interest
seeing
none
are
the
minutes
of
Tuesday
January
17
2023
confirmed
Harry.
Thank
you.
So
the
first
item
before
us
is
the
designation
of
the
former,
a
Cole
sampia
353
Friel
Street
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
I
understand
that
member
podelski
might
have
a
motion
to
move
around
this
item.
A
D
Yes,
thank
you,
whereas
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage
value
attached
as
document
5
outlines
the
Heritage
value
of
the
property
and
whereas
the
Adaptive
reuse
of
this
property
over
the
course
of
its
history
contributes
to
an
understanding
of
the
character
of
San
Diego
and
whereas
the
adaption
of
the
former
Eco
semper
into
a
community
center
reflects
the
community's
efforts
to
use.
Municipal
interventions
to
protect
ottawa's
built
Heritage
and
its
subsequent
adaptation
into
a
multi-use
resident
reflects
the
Contemporary
Community
character.
D
D
We
had
further
resolved
that
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage
value
being
managed
to
include
the
pioneering
rule
played
by
Community
associations
and
the
City
of
Ottawa
in
the
1970s
to
conserve
a
coal
sampier
and
the
founding
of
legislation,
policies
and
programs
to
conserve
ottawa's
disappearing
built
Heritage.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
E
So
the
property
is
located
in
the
Sandy
Hill
cultural
heritage,
character
area
in
Ward,
12
mid-block
between
will
Broad
and
Laurier
on
the
east
side
of
frail
and
can
be
seen
outlined
in
purple.
On
this
slide,
the
original
building
and
early
1930
Edition
are
visible
from
frail
Street,
whereas
at
Slater
editions
face
sir
Wilfred
Laurier
Park
and
are
not
visible
from
frail
Street
next
slide.
Please,
the
provincial
policy
statement,
Ontario
Heritage
Act
and
the
city's
official
plan
provide
Direction
related
to
the
designation
of
properties
in
Ottawa
and
further
Ontario
regulation.
E
Oh
sorry,
still
this
slide
so
also
of
note
is
that
Council
added
this
property
to
the
city's
Heritage
register
in
2015,
following
the
approval
of
phase
two
of
the
Sandy
Hill
Heritage
study,
which
recommended
that
this
property
be
evaluated
for
designation
and
further
changes
to
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
through
Bill.
23,
however,
would
result
in
the
property's
removal
from
the
register.
If
Council
does
not
issue
a
notice
of
intention
to
designate
the
property
by
December,
31st
2025.,
it
would
also
not
be
able
to
relist
the
property
for
five
years
after
this
date.
E
Next
slide,
please
so
now
I'll
speak
to
the
properties,
Heritage
cultural
value,
the
former
cool
St
Pierre
is
a
two
and
a
half
Story
red
brick
building
constructed
in
1906
with
an
early
edition
in
1930.
It's
symmetrical
composition,
brick
exterior
with
strong
Stone
base
and
Decorative
Stone
and
stone
cast
elements
make
it
a
good
example
of
a
purpose-built
school
that
was
designed
in
the
Edwardian
classicism
Style.
E
So
this
slide
lists
the
properties
identified,
Heritage
attributes,
as
listed
on
the
property
statement
of
cultural
heritage
value
that's
attached
as
document
5..
Some
of
the
more
prominent
attributes
include
the
red
brick
and
the
Stone
Face
cladding
dress,
Stone,
lentils
and
Sills,
and
it's
cast
stone
elements
such
as
the
front
entrance
string
course
and
date
panel,
which
were
added
as
part
of
the
1930
Edition
and
the
mature
trees
on
the
front
lawn
as
well.
E
To
note
is
that
all
of
the
attributes
listed
in
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage
value
are
limited
to
the
original
1930
and
sorry
to
the
original
1906
construction
and
the
early
1930
Edition.
The
later
editions
and
the
interior
are
excluded
from
the
proposed
designation
next
slide,
please,
in
terms
of
consultation,
the
property
owner
is
aware
of
the
proposed
designation
as
his
Heritage
Ottawa
action.
Sandy
Hill,
shared
King
and
Maestro
plant
next
slide.
Please,
and
in
conclusion,
stops.
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
report.
We
did
receive
correspondence
from
Heritage
Ottawa
in
support
of
this
application.
I
do
see
that
David
Fleming
is
here
with
us
as
well
and
has
indicated
that
he
does
not
need
to
speak.
If
the
item
carries,
I
have
not
heard
any
musings
on
this
controversial
file.
That's
before
us,
so
does
the
committee
have
any
questions
for
staff.
A
F
F
Some
of
you
may
know
him,
but
anyways
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that,
because
it
is
an
integral
part
of
the
community
and
we
do
like
to
recognize
the
efforts
whether
it
is
in
this
sort
of
Heritage
concept
or
through
historical
attributes,
that
the
francophones
have
had
a
lot
of
fight
to
keep
French
education
viable
in
the
province
of
Ontario,
not
just
here
in
Ottawa
and
designating
this
a
Heritage
building
goes
a
long
way
for
that
recognition.
So
thank
you.
F
G
Thank
you,
chair
I,
just
have
a
question
for
staff,
so
you
say
that
the
owner
hasn't
responded
to
to
the
information
about
the
fact
that
this
building
is
going
to
be
designated
I'm
just
wondering
if
the
property
owner
were
to
oppose
the
designation
after
the
notice
of
intent
like
would
that
stop
the
designation
in
any
way?
I?
Don't
imagine
this
person
would
but.
E
So
the
owner
has
since
acknowledged
receipt
of
the
report.
They
haven't
stated
objection
or
support
for
it,
so
they
are
aware,
but
the
property
owner
does
have
30
days
to
submit
a
notice
of
objection
to
council's
decision
of
the
notice
of
intention
to
designate
at
that
point.
If
Council
decides
to
proceed
with
the
designation,
they
would
pass
the
bylaw
and
the
bylaw
the
owner
would
be
able
to
appeal
the
bylaw
to
the
Olt.
A
Thank
you
so
much
I
think
that
that
probably
addresses
all
the
questions
and
comments
that
were
that
were
for
this
file,
but
I
do
see
that
a
member
podelski
has
raised
his
hand.
I
also
understand
that
his
amending
motion
will
be
further
amended
by
staff
just
to
to
update
it,
but
I'll.
Let
member
podelski
speak.
D
Since
the
second
world
war
Ottawa
as
other
communities
in
Canada,
we
had
citizen
groups
and
volunteer
groups
organizing
to
protect
downtown
neighborhoods
and
to
protect
the
heritage
of
these
these
areas
and
in
Ontario
this
is
even
before
there
was
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
in
1975
and
the
purpose
of
highlighting
in
the
statement
of
Heritage
values.
This
part
of
the
story
of
Saint
Pierre's
school
is
important
to
recognize.
D
Catholic
School
Board,
along
with
nine
other
schools
in
the
core
area,
jeopardizing
not
only
the
quality
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
heritage
and
in
1977
to
1979.
There
was
a
community
campaign
to
urge
the
city
to
buy
sampier
school
for
a
community
center
when
that
was
done
in
1979
20
years
later,
the
city
sold
the
school,
and
this
is
really
quite
interesting
without
designating
it
under
the
Heritage
Act.
D
So
there
was
risk
there
that
the
city
took
to
the
the
property
and
so
I
think
that
it's
important
when
the
statements
of
Reason
get
drafted,
that
we
look
at
the
period
post-war
period
to
see
the
impact
that
cases
like
this
made
honor
quite
admirable.
Heritage
programs
and
policies
today
in
Ottawa,
so
I
just
thought,
I'd
speak
to
that
motion.
I'd
hope
that
people
will
support
the
amendment
of
The
of
the
statement
of
reason
to
include
this
historic.
These
historic
events.
Thank
you.
A
We
appreciate
the
submission
of
this
amending
motion.
I
think
it's
important
to
provide
that
historical
context
in
terms
of
the
statement,
so
thank
you,
member
podelski
for
for
doing
that,
and
also
for
so
eloquently
providing
us
that
history
for
the
record
here
at
our
meeting.
So
my
understanding
is
that
the
amending
motion
does
not
need
to
be
need
to
be
changed.
So
is
the
amending
motion
carried.
G
A
Thank
you
so
much
so
this
report
will
be
submitted
to
Ottawa
city
council
on
February
22nd.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
an
application
for
Demolition
and
new
construction
at
41
Arlington
Avenue,
a
property
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
can
staff.
Please
provide
an
overview
of
this
report.
H
H
So
this
slide
shows
Geographic
context
for
the
subject
property,
which
is
highlighted
in
Red,
so
41
Arlington
Avenue
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
Arlington
Avenue
between
Kent
Street
and
Bank
Street
and
across
from
glass
and
public
school
images
on
the
right
show
a
few
views
of
the
subject:
property.
In
particular.
These
images
highlight
the
adjacent
context
which
includes
a
row
of
similarly
scaled
front:
Gable
houses
to
the
East
and
a
red,
brick
two
and
a
half
story
building
to
the
West.
So
next
slide
please.
H
This
subject:
property
is
located
in
the
center
Town
Heritage
Conservation
District.
So
a
partial
image
of
those
boundaries
are
shown
on
the
right.
This
District
was
first
designated
in
1997,
and
a
new
hcd
plan
for
the
district
and
Minto
Park
was
approved
in
2022
coming
into
force
in
effect
in
October,
18th
2022..
H
So
to
note
this
application
is
the
first
application
heard
by
bhc
under
this
new
plan
and
next
slide.
Please
So
currently
on
the
property
is
a
two-story
front.
Gable
house
clad
in
horizontal
siding,
constructed
Circa
1879-1901.,
the
house
features
a
ground
floor,
front,
porch
and
a
covered
balcony
on
the
Second
Story,
and
it's
been
altered
over
time
in
very
few
of
the
original
elements
or
materials
exist.
H
The
center
town
and
mental
Park
hcd
plan
identifies
this
property
as
a
contributing
building
in
the
hcd
and
a
character
supporting
resource
based
on
the
previous
Center
Town
Heritage
inventory.
Specific
policies
of
the
hcd
plan
apply
to
constru
character,
supporting
resources
and
contributing
buildings.
So
we'll
now
turn
our
attention
to
the
proposal
and
next
slide
please.
H
H
H
So
this
image
just
shows
an
alternate
angle
of
the
building
and
just
important.
It's
important
note
that
the
adjacent
buildings
shown
in
these
renderings
are
not
part
of
the
application,
but
they
are
included
to
show
context
and
next
slide.
Please,
and
then
this
is
a
rendering
of
the
rear
of
the
proposed
development
and
next
slide.
Please,
and
this
slide
shows
the
site
plan
of
the
pros
development.
So
to
note,
no
vehicular
parking
is
proposed
on
site
and
the
setback
established
by
other
buildings
on
the
street
is
generally
maintained
by
The
Proposal
and
next
slide.
Please.
H
So
this
image
shows
a
detailed
front
elevation
of
The
Proposal.
So
just
to
note,
the
Gable
and
Bay
is
the
bay
and
Gable
is
clad
in
vertical
siding
and
the
windows
are
metal.
The
porch
impediment
are
also
metal
with
a
cedar
soffit,
underneath
the
shape
of
this
porch
is
a
contemporary
interpretation
of
the
adjacent
porches
and
next
slide.
Please,
this
image
just
shows
the
west
elevation,
so
just
to
note
that
that
brick
cladding
on
the
front
facade,
does
wrap
around
partially
and
some
of
that
cedar
or
vertical
wood.
Siding
is
also
carried
through.
F
H
5.3
and
5.5
both
contemplate
the
demolition
of
character,
supporting
resources
provided
that
their
removal
accomplishes
other
city
building
goals
and
that
any
replacement
building
complies
with
the
plans,
other
policies
and
guidelines.
So
this
slide
demonstrates
some
of
the
features
of
the
Bill
of
The
Proposal
that
support
its
compatibility
with
the
hcd
and
surrounding
buildings.
So
the
bay
windows
and
Gable
highlighted
in
blue,
reflect
the
existing
building's
front,
Gable
form
and
the
Bay
of
the
adjacent
brick
building
the
height
of
the
front
porch,
which
is
highlighted
in
the
red
line.
H
There
continues
the
dominant
line,
that's
established
by
other
buildings
along
the
street,
they're
further
enhancing
the
compatibility,
so
this
enables
an
accessible
front
grade
entrance.
That's
actually
built
at
the
grade
of
the
street,
while
still
maintaining
compatibility
with
adjacent
buildings
that
have
a
elevated
front,
porch
and
entrance
and
next
slide.
Please
so.
Heritage
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
supporting
material
and
find
that
it
is
compliant
and
consistent
with
applicable
policies
and
guidelines
of
the
hcd
plan.
H
So
in
summary,
The
Proposal
is
compliant
with
the
policies
for
demolition
of
a
character
supporting
resource
for
the
following
reasons.
The
character
of
the
existing
house
has
been
significantly
diminished
by
alterations.
The
design
of
The
Proposal
is
compatible
with
the
hcd
interflex
elements
of
the
existing
building
and
surrounding
buildings,
and
the
proposal
supports
the
broader
City
goals
of
intensification.
H
Therefore,
staff
are
recommending
that
this
application
be
approved,
subject
to
three
conditions
based
on
some
of
the
recommendations
set
out
in
the
cultural
heritage
evaluation
report
submitted
by
any
applicant
first,
that
the
app
can
provide
final
material
samples
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building.
Permit.
Second,
that
the
applicant
provide
a
final
landscape
plan
and,
third,
that
historic
documentation
on
the
subject
building
be
filed
with
the
city
of
Ottawa
archives,
as
per
hcd
plan
policy.
5.6
and
next
slide,
please,
the
final
two
recommendations
are
standard.
H
They
delegate
Authority
for
minor
changes
to
staff
and
establish
a
two-year
expiry
date
for
the
permanent
and
just
finally
to
note
in
terms
of
consultation,
the
center
Town
Community
Association
is
aware
of
this
report
and
application.
The
war
counselor
is
aware,
and
the
chair
of
bhc
is
also
aware-
and
next
slide,
please.
A
Thank
you
for
your
report.
We
did
get
correspondence
through
the
clerk's
office
from
a
resident
from
the
Ottawa
Carlton
district
school
board,
with
comments
and
also
from
Heritage
Ottawa.
We
do
have
speakers
registered
from
the
applicant,
the
owner,
as
well
as
the
applicant
team,
just
wanted
to
see
if
they
wanted
to
speak
to
this
item,
especially
if
the
item
carries.
I
I
Okay,
so,
given
that
Greg
provided
such
a
comprehensive
presentation,
I
will
go
through
this
very
quickly
I'm
good
morning,
everyone
I'm
Alex
Rose
Thompson
from
Heritage
Studio
I'm,
based
in
Kingston
Ontario
and
along
with
the
the
other
members
of
the
team.
Here
today,
the
project
team
consists
of
juxta,
Architects
and
Photon
planning
and
design
next
slide.
Please
so
again,
just
to
remind
you
where
the
property
is
on
Arlington
Avenue
and
again
it's
it's
at
the
sort
of
southern
boundary
of
the
center
Town
hcd
plan
area.
Next
slide,
please.
I
So
the
property
contains
the
detached
two-story
wood
frame,
Gable
front
house
and
I
will
just
clarify
that
through
historic
research,
I
was
able
to
narrow
the
date
of
the
building's
construction
to
actually
between
1896
and
1901
through
looking
at
Heritage
sorry,
fire
insurance
plans,
City
directories
and
a
variety
of
other
resources.
So
really
it's
a
vernacular
building
with
a
very
gentle
Gothic
Revival
influence
you
can
see
in
the
steeply
pitched
roof
and
the
the
steeply
proportioned
Windows
they
have,
as
Greg
mentioned,
been
multiple
alterations
and
additions
over
its
lifetime.
I
At
this
point,
there's
really
no
original
architectural
detailing
left
and
also
we
did
observe
some
degree
of
settlement
as
the
stone
foundation
has
been
parched
over
with
cement
and
over
time.
It
is
trapped,
water
and
causing
the
lime,
the
softer
lime
water
to
to
Decay.
So,
overall,
you
know
what
we
see
before
us
is
very
much
not
the
original
design.
We
would
have
Once
Upon
a
Time
and
unfortunately,
no
historic
photographs
were
found
in
the
process.
I
So
we
don't
have
a
a
great
sense
of
what
it
originally
looked
like,
but
we
can
look
to
other
buildings
for
for
to
make
estimated
guesses
next
slide.
Please
so
I
just
again
wanted
to
show
the
the
current
context,
the
red
arrows
pointing
to
the
house-
and
this
is
again
as
Greg
said-
it's
a
character
supporting
resource
it
can
contributes
to
the
buildings,
to
the
streetscape
and
really
through
the
research
and
evaluation
of
this
house
to
the
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
process.
I
What
came
became
very
clear
is
that
its
contribution
today
is
very
much
limited
to
its
form,
so
the
Gable
front
form
of
it
as
well
as
its
scale,
so
it's
two-story
scale
but
other
than
that.
It's
Heritage
character
and
Architectural
Integrity
are
so
greatly
diminished
that,
theoretically,
its
contribution
could
be
maintained
through
a
new
contextually
designed
building
next
slide.
Please
so
again,
you've
seen
these
photos
very
quickly.
I
So
again,
as
Greg
pointed
out,
there
are
design
features
that
are
intended
to
reflect
the
existing
building
now,
as
well
as
these
adjacent
buildings
in
the
streetscape,
so
that
the
new
building
does
knit
in
very
cleanly
and
comfortably
with
the
existing
streetscape
and
continue
on
that
that
character.
So
again,
the
porch
with
the
pediment
is
very
much
a
defining
feature.
I
So,
as
the
Heritage
consultant,
the
architect
and
the
planning
team,
we
went
through
very
like
many
many
many
many
designs
trying
to
meet
the
the
policies
and
guidelines
in
the
HTT
plan,
but
also
just
to
find
the
design
that
felt
quite
honestly
to
everybody
to
be
the
right
style
and
right
design
for
this
site.
So
in
summary,
the
new
building
response,
the
quality
and
character
of
the
surrounding
streetscape
by
taking
design
cues
from
existing
adjacent
dwellings.
I
The
result
is
a
modern
building
that
is
distinguishable
and
formed,
but
visually
and
physically
compatible
with
the
Stratton
historic
Street.
Escape
next
slide,
please
so
again.
Moving
forward.
In
conclusion,
importantly
I
just
want
to
say
that.
Certainly
we
believe
this
through
the
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
process
that
the
building
does
conserve
the
cultural
heritage,
values
and
attributes
of
the
district
and
complies
with
the
objectives
and
policies
as
well.
I
So,
given
the
properties,
limited
cultural
heritage,
value
and
contribution
of
the
property
to
the
hcd,
the
value
of
to
the
community
of
its
physical
conservation
would
be
insignificant.
On
balance
with
the
benefits
of
a
well-designed
residential
building
that
represents
gentle
but
significant
intensification
within
an
established
neighborhood
so
again
moving
forward
and
following
this
Heritage
approval,
the
next
step
is
to
apply
for
minor
variants,
as
the
property
fits
within
the
section
6
section
60
of
the
zoning
bylaw
for
the
Heritage
overlay
and
does
not
meet
those
current
provisions.
A
G
C
They
are
students,
so
they
are
international
students.
They
don't
plan
to
stay
after
the
school
year.
Okay,
definitely
I
will
be
offering
them
whatever
the
law
requires.
Usually
I
know
it's
one
month
free
and
if
they
haven't,
we
are
still
in
the
process.
So
once
we
have
the
building
permit,
only
then
we
you
know
I
can
speak
to
them,
so
they
are
as
uncertainties
in
the
middle.
So
I
have
to
speak
to
them.
Only
when
things
are
certain.
Okay,.
G
C
G
This
is
another
example
of
a
family-sized
apartment,
it's
being
replaced
with
more
housing,
which
is
great
I
support
density,
but
I
will
just
continue
to
stay
on
the
record
that
the
size
of
homes
like
this
are
the
ones
that
we're
losing
in
Centertown,
and
it
becomes
increasingly
challenging
to
convince
developers
to
build
apartments
that
are
bigger
than
a
small
one
bedroom
or
even
a
small
two
bedroom.
But
thank
you
very
much.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
this
application.
The
building
looks
lovely
to
me.
G
C
C
J
Thank
you,
chair.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
congratulate
everyone
on
the
project.
I
I
certainly
think
it's
a
it's
a
positive
step
to
to
replace
the
little
house
with
something
more
viable.
Although
I
take
the
counselor's
comments
about
the
importance
of
of
family
size
units
being
available
in
Centertown,
my
question
is
more
specific
to
the
design.
J
You
know
it.
One
of
the
things
about
the
stretch
of
Arlington
Avenue
is
it's
consistent,
two
and
a
half
story
pattern
as
a
streetscape,
which
is
also
increasingly
rare
and
I
I,
appreciate
the
effort
with
the
protruding
Bay
to
replicate
what
is
directly
next
door,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
remind
me
just
confirm
that
will
be
clad
in
wood,
siding
Alex.
I
J
Has
there
been
any
consideration?
This
is
just
a
minor
point
of,
rather
than
it
being
vertical
that
it
be
horizontal
just
because
there
is
I,
don't
think
the
verticality
of
the
structure
needs
to
be
emphasized
and
the
vertical
siding
would
do
that.
So
that's
just
a
comment
to
perhaps
might
help
to
visually
kind
of
reduce,
reduce
it
and
make
it
a
little
more
consistent
with
that
to
two
two
and
a
half
story
pattern
which
is
really
elsewhere
pretty
solid
along
the
streetscape.
That's
my
only
comment,
I
appreciate
your
presentation.
Thank
you.
A
The
committee
has
no
in-camera
items.
Are
there
any
notices
of
motion
seeing
none?
Are
there
any
inquiries,
no
increase
under
other
business?
There
is
one
planning
circulation
on
the
agenda
which
was
distributed
to
members
prior
to
the
meeting.
Members
of
the
public
have
the
opportunity
to
comment
through
devops
on
ottawa.ca
on
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
Applications
would
be
considered
at
a
later
date
and
this
planning
circulation
involves
178,
Nepean,
Street
and
219
and
223
Bank
Street.