►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee – June 8, 2021
Description
Built Heritage Sub-Committee – June 8, 2021 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
Well,
good
morning,
everybody
I
see
that
we
have
quorum,
so
I
want
to
welcome
everybody
to
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
meeting
of
june,
8th
2021
and
I'd
like
to
call
the
members
to
order
because
of
the
continuing
state
of
emergency
due
to
the
coven
19
pandemic.
This
meeting
is
being
held
remotely
through
zoom,
though
we
are
meeting
virtually
the
land
on
which
ottawa
is
built
upon
is
unseated,
algonquin
and
shnabe
territory.
A
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
to
acknowledge
that
the
peoples
of
the
algonquin
anishinaabe
nation
have
lived
on
this
territory
for
millennia,
their
culture
and
presence
have
nurtured
and
continued
to
nurture
this
land.
The
city
of
ottawa,
honors
the
people
and
land
of
the
algonquin
anishinabe
nation,
the
city
of
ottawa,
honors,
all
first
nations
inuit
and
metis
people
and
their
valuable
past
and
present
contributions
to
this
land.
A
As
noted
earlier,
this
meeting
is
being
held
remotely
through
zoom.
Those
who
do
not
need
to
participate
in
the
meeting
can
also
watch
it
live
on
the
ottawa
city
council,
youtube
channel
a
reminder
to
participants
to
please
keep
your
microphones
muted.
Until
I
call
upon
you
to
speak,
I
will
provide
each
committee,
member
with
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
or
comment
on
each
item
in
the
order
in
which
they
raise
their
hand
in
zoom
for
panelists
the
raise
hand
option
is
found
at
the
bottom
of
the
participants
list
for
those
calling
in
press
star
9.
A
A
E
E
A
Well,
thank
you
for
that
declaration.
Thank
you.
Member
hustle.
If
there
are
no
more
declarations
of
of
interest,
are
the
minutes
of
tuesday
may
11th
2021
confirmed
all
right
comfort.
Thank
you.
So
our
first
area
of
focus
is
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development,
right-of-way
heritage
and
urban
design
services.
The
first
item
before
us
is
an
application
for
demolition
and
new
construction
at
321
cloverdale
road,
a
property
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
located
in
the
rideau
in
the
in
the
rocklift
park,
heritage
conservation
district
can
staff.
E
Good
morning,
mr
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
just
before
mr
juarez
starts
his
presentation,
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
him
to
the
committee.
So
luis
is
a
new
heritage
planner
with
the
team.
So
this
is
his
first
time
before
the
committee,
with
all
of
you,
so
he's
a
new
heritage,
planner
two
on
our
team
and
started
with
us
in
january.
So
he's
gotten
off
the
hook
until
now,
but
here
he
is
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to
him.
F
F
F
So
321
cloverdale
road
is
a
property
designated
under
part.
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
located
in
the
rocklift
park
heritage
conservation
district.
The
applicant
proposes
to
demolish
the
existing
grade.
2
dwelling
and
construct
a
new
two-story
split-level
dwelling
on
the
property
next
slide.
Please.
F
The
subject
property
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
cloverdale
road
across
from
fairview
avenue
and
situated
along
a
curve
in
the
road
and
above
the
acacia
escarpment.
As
the
map
on
the
right
of
the
side
shows,
the
property
is
indicated
in
the
tan
color,
meaning
that
it
is
classified
as
a
grade
two
property
in
the
heritage.
Conservation
district
there's
also
two
grade.
One
properties
that
immediately
abut
the
subject:
property,
including
480,
fernhill,
road
to
the
west
and
275
cloverdale
road
to
the
south.
F
The
existing
dwelling
on
the
property
is
one
and
a
half
stories
in
height,
clad
in
stucco,
and
contains
a
rectangular
shaped
plan
and
steeply
pitched
roof.
The
house
was
originally
constructed
in
1930.
However,
three
later
editions
altered
the
dwellings
original
rectangular
plan,
which
is
visible
on
the
aerial
image
to
the
left.
F
The
additions
include
the
construction
of
a
double
car
port
and
on
the
interior
side,
elevation
and
the
covering
of
the
porch
along
the
front
elevation
which
which
were
both
constructed
in
1964.
and
shown
to
the
image
on
the
right.
There
is
also
a
one-story
kitchen
edition
in
the
rear
constructed
in
1989
next
slide.
Please.
F
The
landscape
character
of
the
property
includes
a
large,
mature
silver
maple
tree
that
abuts
the
adjacent
grade,
one
property
to
the
south
and
shown
on
the
image
to
the
right,
mature,
cedar,
hedges
along
the
property
lines,
a
large
open
lawn
across
the
front
and
side
yards
that
about
cloverdale
road
and
typical
along
this
section
of
cloverdale
road.
The
dwelling
is
placed
above
the
escarpment
and
above
the
roadway
next
slide.
Please.
F
This
slide
shows
several
components
of
the
proposed
new
dwelling
and
associated
landscape
design.
So
you'll
see
that
the
site
plan
has
a
area,
that's
shaded
in
gray,
which
indicates
the
footprint
of
the
proposed
dwelling.
The
darker
shade
signifies
where
the
house
is
two
stories.
The
dashed
red
line
indicates
the
footprint
of
the
existing
house.
F
F
The
dwelling
design
includes
an
attached
sunken
two-car
garage
which
is
located
in
the
same
vicinity
as
the
existing
garage
and
a
new
driveway
with
similar
placement
to
the
existing
driveway,
but
shifted
away
from
the
silver
maple.
I'd
also
like
to
note
at
this
point
that
the
report
incorrectly
referred
to
the
driveway
as
reverse
sloped.
So
while
the
driveway
is
sunk
in,
it
does
maintain
a
positive
two
percent
slope
towards
the
street
property
line.
F
F
F
Nine
existing
mature
trees
will
also
be
retained,
including
the
hedges
along
the
property
lines
and
the
hardscape
materials
used
for
the
pool,
deck
patio
and
walkways
will
be
permeable.
I'd
also
like
to
note
at
this
point
that
the
report
and
the
landscape
plan
indicate
11
tree
replacements.
However,
the
city's
forester
identified
an
additional
tree
replacement
requirement
for
the
right-of-way
since
then,
so
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
provide
the
additional
tree,
which
will
be
reflected
in
the
subsequent
landscape
plan,
to
be
approved
through
delegated
authority.
F
This
slide
shows
the
elevation
submitted
by
the
applicant.
So
as
seen
in
the
elevations,
the
proposed
dwelling
is
designed
with
split
massing,
flat,
roof
lines.
A
second
story,
road
terrace,
a
sunken
garage
and
will
be
primarily
clad
in
wood
and
shown
here-
is
a
streetscape
elevation,
demonstrating
the
relationship
between
the
subject,
property
and
neighboring
275
cloverdale,
which
is
the
adjacent
grade,
1
property
to
the
south.
F
The
distance
between
the
proposed
dwelling
and
the
abiding
lot
line
is
4.5
meters,
whereas
the
zoning
bylat
requires
12
meters
and
the
current
condition
provides
3.9
meters.
So
a
subsequent
minor
variance
approval
will
be
required
for
the
reduction
in
the
rear
yard
setback
in
terms
of
height.
This
graphic
shows
geodetic
elevations,
demonstrating
that
the
proposed
dwelling
is
7.72
meters
tall
at
its
peak,
measured
from
the
average
grade,
which
is
approximately
0.59
meters
taller
than
the
midpoint
of
the
roof
of
275
cloverdale
road.
F
F
F
F
So
heritage
staff
are
recommending
approval
of
the
application
to
demolish
the
existing
grade.
2
dwelling
and
construct
a
new
two-story
split
level
dwelling
at
321
cloverdale
with
associated
landscaping
heritage
staff
are
also
requesting
that
authority
be
delegated
for
minor
design
changes
and
that
the
heritage
permit
be
approved
with
a
two-year
expiry
date.
A
Thank
you,
louise
for
a
wonderful
first
presentation
that
you
provided
to
the
subcommittee.
It's
much
appreciated,
very
in-depth
and
very
informative.
We
did
receive
correspondence
from
a
number
of
residents
as
well
as
heritage
ottawa
on
this
file,
and
we
do
have
a
number
of
registered
speakers,
including
christopher
simmons
of
christopher
simmons,
architects
incorporated
who
is
first
to
to
provide
a
deputation.
D
A
G
G
This
proposal
provides
for
suitable
replacement
that
respects
the
height
setback,
landscape
and
materiality,
as
required
by
the
rockcliff
park,
heritage
conservation
plan,
statement
of
cultural
heritage
value
and
guidelines.
We
urge
the
subcommittee
to
recommend
the
staff's
reports
recommendations.
Thank
you.
D
A
A
D
H
H
H
The
main
house
on
this
property
was
constructed
in
1969
and
is
an
example
of
modern
experimental
architecture
that
defines
the
briacle
of
hcd.
The
property
contains
a
two-story
cubic
shaped
residence
with
a
low
hipped
pyramidal
roof.
The
main
living
space
of
the
house
is
on
the
second
story,
with
the
main
entrance
reached
via
a
long
set
of
steps.
H
H
The
applicant
is
proposing
several
alterations
to
the
property,
including
the
rehabilitation
of
the
existing
home,
the
demolition
and
reconstruction
of
the
side
garage,
the
construction
of
a
two-story,
rear
edition
and
landscape
alterations,
including
an
in-ground
pool
and
construction
of
a
storage
shade.
The
height
form
and
footprint
of
the
existing
house
will
not
be
altered
next
slide.
Please.
H
H
H
H
H
The
proposed
rear
edition
has
been
carefully
designed
so
as
not
to
compromise
the
design
intentions
of
the
original
and
to
ensure
that
it
remains
subordinate
to
distinguishable
from
and
compatible
with
the
original.
The
proposed
materials
are
appropriate
and
the
existing
landscape
features
of
the
lot
will
be
substantially
preserved
and
enhanced
next
slide.
Please.
H
The
proposal
also
conforms
with
standards,
1,
11
and
12
of
the
standards
and
guidelines
for
the
conservation
of
historic
places
in
canada.
Next
slide,
please,
the
plans
associated
with
this
application
were
posted
on
the
city's
development
application
search
tool.
The
rothwell
heights
property
owners,
association,
heritage
ottawa
and
neighbours
within
30
meters
were
notified
of
the
application
and
counselor
tierney
is
also
aware
of
the
application.
H
Next
slide.
Please,
heritage
staff
are
recommending
approval
of
the
application
to
alter
eight
briarcliff
drive,
on
condition
that
the
applicant
provides
samples
of
the
final
exterior
materials
for
approval
of
heritage
staff
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building.
Permit
staff
are
also
recommending
that
authority
be
delegated
to
approve
minor
design
changes
and
that
the
heritage
permit
be
approved
with
a
two-year
expiry
date.
Next
slide,
please.
A
A
B
B
I
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
the
city
staff
for
the
collaboration
during
the
development
of
this
proposal.
It's
been
a
challenging
process
for
us,
be
a
heritage
project
and
a
development
of
alteration
of
this
magnitude.
Essentially,
my
presentation
this
morning
is
simply
to
address
a
point
in
the
recommendation.
B
The
heritage
permit
is
approved
with
the
condition
that
we
provide
the
cladding
material
to
the
heritage
staff
before
the
approval
of
the
building
permits,
and
I
want
to
address
this
particular
point.
So
what
it
mean
is
that
before
we
get
the
building
permit,
we
need
to
go
back
to
the
heritage
staff
and
provide
them
the
choice
of
wood,
stucco
or
brick.
B
B
B
B
If
the
city
staff
would
like
to
to
have
a
condition
there,
my
suggestion
would
be
to
to
recommend
the
sorry,
the
cladding
material,
to
be
one
of
those
approved
in
the
broadcast
heritage
plan,
which
is
stocko,
brick
or
wood,
and
the
second
point
is,
I
think
there
is
a
typo,
the
garage
we
recommending
here.
We
propose
it's
a
10
by
10
and
not
a
7
by
10
foot,
so
it's
a
typo
that
we
also
has
made
because
we
changed
the
planet
last
month.
A
A
G
G
G
A
I
The
neighborhood
has
never
experienced
the
demolition
of
an
original
home
and
although
nine
of
its
23
homes
have
changed
ownership
in
the
eight
years
since
designation,
this
is
the
first
application
for
alterations
in
the
briarcliff
hcd
to
go
before
the
committee
and
council.
This
is
a
rather
unusual
and
unprecedented
circumstance.
We
realize
in
the
case
of
most
hcds,
and
it
points
to
the
success.
I
Design
covenants,
which
governed
the
creation
of
the
neighborhood
and
which
have
largely
been
carried
over
to
the
briarcliff
hcd
plan
in
support
of
designation
in
2013,
the
royal
architectural
institute
of
canada
called
briarcliff
quote
an
irreplaceable
record
of
a
specific
and
very
special
moment
in
time
and
stated
again
quote.
The
character
of
the
district
is
defined
by
the
delicate
balance
between
small
self-effacing
modernist
structures
and
a
largely
natural
landscape,
making
it
highly
vulnerable
to
insensitive
interventions.
I
Removal
of
too
many
trees,
oversized
dwellings
or
buildings
designed
without
regard
for
the
prevailing
character
of
the
area,
can
all
quickly
destroy
the
integrity
of
the
district.
Regulatory
protection
is
therefore
vital
to
its
continued
existence,
especially
as
current
popular
taste
seems
to
favor
houses
of
increasingly
large
scale
and
faux
historical
references.
I
Preservation
of
the
district's
integrity
is
important
to
canada's
collective
cultural
heritage.
End
quote:
preservation
of
briarcliff's
integrity
requires
continued
respect
for
its
understated,
modernist
style,
the
modest
scale
of
its
buildings
and
its
naturalized
forested
landscape,
which
supports
the
modernist
ideal
of
living
with
nature.
I
I
As
a
foundational
principle,
we
particularly
support
the
briarcliff
hcd
bylaw,
section
226,
which
states
that
quote
additions
to
contributing
buildings
may
be
appropriate,
but
special
care
must
be
taken
in
the
design,
scale
and
sighting
of
additions.
Buildings
in
briarcliff
were
cited
to
minimize
their
impact
on
the
natural
landscape
and
to
maximize
privacy
between
neighbors.
These
intentions
must
be
considered
when
planning
an
addition.
I
End
quote:
we
note
that
the
existing
house
has
the
smallest
footprint
in
the
hcd,
and
we
therefore
support
the
proposed
edition,
which
will
result
in
an
overall
footprint
consistent
with
the
size
and
scale
of
other
houses
in
the
district,
thereby
respecting
a
critical
heritage
attribute
further.
With
regard
to
the
proposed
edition,
we
supported
sighting
at
the
rear
of
the
property,
where
it
will
be
largely
hidden
from
public
view
behind
the
existing
house
and
stands
of
mature
trees.
I
In
light
of
the
circumstances
unique
to
this
property.
We
support
relocation
of
the
original
front
door
from
the
second
story
to
ground
level,
directly
below
removal
of
the
non-original
staircase
and
peaked
entrance,
canopy
and
replacement
of
the
original
door
with
a
full
length
window
of
the
same
dimensions,
maintaining
the
fenestration
of
the
original
front
facade.
I
We
also
support
the
recommendation
that
original
wood
trim
patterns
on
the
existing
house
be
retained,
including
the
wood
spandrel
panels
above
the
two
new
windows
at
ground
level.
As
seen
in
document
seven,
however,
to
better
retain
the
heritage
character
of
the
existing
ground
and
compatibility
with
the
hcd,
we
would
support
the
use
of
wood
framed
windows
with
narrow
profiles
on
the
front
facade,
reserving
the
introduction
of
aluminum
windows
for
the
side
facades.
In
the
new
edition,
we
note
that
the
landscape
at
eight
briarcliff
remains
in
largely
original
condition.
I
We
support
the
clarification
of
planting
and
or
replanting
of
native
trees
at
the
rear
of
the
property
to
mitigate
tree
removals
behind
the
existing
house
and
we'll
be
happy
to
provide
a
list
through
city
staff
of
native
trees,
as
the
house
has
been
standing
vacant
for
nearly
three
years
area
residents
are
looking
forward
to
its
rehabilitation
and
renewal
with
respect
for
its
heritage
character.
In
conclusion,
we
support
the
recommendations
of
the
city
staff
report
for
conditional
approval
of
this
proposal.
A
A
C
I
I
Exterior
cladding
materials
were
part
of
the
original
design
covenants
to
which
each
owner
in
briarcliff
had
to
agree,
and
everyone
had
to
hire
a
registered
architect
that
architect
had
to
design
and
build
with
a
very
limited
palette
of
materials
and
then
present
the
proposed
design
before
a
committee
for
approval
before
any
homes
could
be
built
and
the
reason
for
those
restrictive
design
materials
was
largely
in
order
to
provide
cohesion
between
the
homes
in
the
district
and
compatibility
with
the
natural
landscape
and
largely
one
of
the
reasons.
Perhaps
the
biggest
reason
that
briarcliff
remains
intact.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Yes,
my
question
is
for
mr
van
wyck,
I'm
just
noticing
in
the
letter
that
came
in
from
the
rothwell
heights
heritage
committee,
reference
to
the
windows,
wooden
windows
versus
aluminum
windows,
and
I
can
see
from
the
changes
the
alterations
made
to
the
building
in
order
to
accommodate
the
new
entrance
and
the
removal
of
the
garage
from
the
main
structure,
which
will
make
sense.
H
Thank
you
very
much,
so
the
applicant
has
indicated
materials
very
broadly
that
they
wish
to
use,
which
is,
which
is
why
we've
recommended
the
condition
they've
indicated
to
us
that
they
would
like
to
replace
the
existing
windows
with
aluminum
frame
windows,
and
although
heritage
staff
would
support
retention
of
the
original
material,
which
is
wood.
The
hcd
plan
does
allow
for
alternative
materials,
and
we
believe
that
this
proposal
is
appropriate.
C
H
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
just
one
last
question
about
materials.
Just
coming
back
to
that,
I
notice
in
the
drawings
that
the
addition,
the
original
building
it
specifies
the
use
of
stucco,
the
brick
and
the
wood
is
being
proposed
for
the
addition
and
which
makes
sense
to
keep
it
separate
and
distinct
from
the
original
building,
which
is,
as
we
saw
in
the
photographs
stucco.
C
C
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Vice
chair
quinn
and
I
just
had
a
just
a
really
quick
question
for
for
adrian
around
the
conditions
we
heard
of
the
applicant
talking
about
the
potential
removal
of
conditions,
but
the
fact
that
there's
the
capacity
to
work
with
staff
and
and
also
the
concern
that,
if
any
staff
member
changed
that
the
trajectory
of
the
application
in
the
way
that
the
materiality
selections
go
forward
change.
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
give
us
any
insight
into
that.
H
So
heritage
staff
need
to
be
able
to
review
and
evaluate
the
specific
details
when
they
do
come
forward
and
because
this
is
the
first
full
application
in
briarcliff.
We're
we're
taking
specific
care
to
ensure
that
materials
that
are
chosen
at
the
end
of
the
day
are
compatible
with
the
existing
house
and
with
the
hcd
plan
as
a
whole.
A
J
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
chair
king.
I
would
like
to
compliment
mr
ono,
the
owner
and
builder
of
the
of
the
extension
and
the
renovation
of
this
house.
You
may
be
surprised
to
find
that
the
original
architect
brian
mccloskey,
was
a
colleague
of
mine.
We
actually
practiced
together
in
1969
the
year
that
this
was
designed,
and
I
feel
confident
that
he
would
be
very
happy
to
see
the
house
rehabilitated.
J
That's
my
intervention
and
it's
very
satisfying
to
see
the
work
that
was
done
by
the
the
briarcliff
community,
er
wrathful,
heist,
community
association
and
having
this
heritage
conservation,
district
designated
and
good
luck
to
everyone
I'll
be
watching
this
one
very
carefully.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
C
One
building
in
the
associated
streetscape,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
recommendations.
One
two
and
three
be
amended
to
add
the
following
as
a
condition
of
approval
conditional
upon
the
applicant
in
consultation
with
heritage
staff
undertaking
further
analysis
of
the
height
of
the
proposed
building,
as
it
relates
to
the
height
of
the
grade.
One
building
at
429
lansdowne
road
to
ensure
the
proposed
height
is
consistent
with
the
height
of
the
grade
one
building
and
meets
guidelines.
A
K
K
K
K
The
property
is
located
directly
south
of
the
rockland
tub
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
Property
is
a
two-story
dwelling
located
at
429,
lansdowne
road
and
identified
as
a
grade.
One
property
in
the
hcd
plan
to
the
west
is
a
single-story
dwelling
located
at
534
lakehurst
road
identified
as
a
grade
2
in
the
hcd
plan
and
next
slide.
Please.
K
The
subject
property
presently
contains
a
single
story:
dwelling
constructed
in
1958
in
a
bungalow
style,
the
building
has
an
irregular
shape,
low,
pitched
gable
on
hip
roof
and
the
bottom
two
thirds
of
the
house
are
clad
in
stone,
whereas
the
upper
third
is
clad
in
stucco,
the
property
features
a
large
landscape
front
and
rear
yard,
which
includes
large
planting
beds
and
several
mature
trees
and
next
slide.
Please.
K
This
image
shows
the
proposed
site
plan,
as
illustrated
here.
The
design
of
the
proposed
dwelling
is
very
unique,
incorporating
two
separate
masses
that
are
linked
to
form
a
single
dwelling,
so
the
darker
mass
located
towards
the
east
of
the
property,
is
two
stories
in
height.
While
the
lighter
mass
located
towards
the
west
of
the
property
is
one
story
in
height,
the
larger
mass
is
set
back
to
the
same
position
as
the
existing
dwelling,
while
the
smaller
mass
is
set
back
further
from
the
large
mass.
K
These
two
masses
are
connected
at
two
points.
The
first
is
a
small
entrance
vestibule
and
the
second
is
a
central
glass
cloud
hallway
the
design
meets
all
applicable
zoning
provisions
for
the
area
and
no
other
applications
such
as
a
minor
variance,
are
required
to
permit
this
proposal
next
slide.
Please.
K
So
this
image
shows
the
proposed
front
elevation.
The
design
of
the
dwelling
draws
inspiration
from
the
english
manor
style
dwellings
prominent
throughout
rockcliff
park,
but
is
executed
in
a
contemporary
fashion.
The
two
masses
both
feature
a
front
gable
style,
a
front
cable
shape
and
are
clad
primarily
in
a
natural
stone
veneer.
K
K
K
The
front
gable
style
design
is
carried
through
to
the
rear
of
the
property
and
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
shows
the
west
elevation
of
the
property
so
again,
some
elements
of
wood
siding
but
primarily
stone
veneer
and
the
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
shows
the
east
elevation
so
again,
primarily
cloud
here
in
stone
and
next
slide.
Please.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
The
following
policies
were
consulted
within
within
the
report,
so
guideline
guidelines,
7.3.1
of
the
rock
cliff
park,
hdd
plan
for
demolition
and
reconstruction
guidelines,
7.3.3
for
landscaping,
guidelines,
7.4.2
for
guidelines
for
new
buildings
and
7.4.3
at
the
landscape,
guidelines
for
new
buildings
and
additions
and
next
slide.
Please
standards,
1
and
standards.
11
have
also
been
identified,
as
applicable.
Standards
from
the
standard
guidelines
for
the
conservation
of
historic
places
in
canada
and
staff
are
satisfied
that
they
have
been
met
through
this
application
and
next
slide.
Please.
K
So
consultation,
the
plans
for
this
property
for
this
proposal
were
posted
on
the
city
of
ottawa's
development
application
website
and
were
available
for
public
viewing
a
consult.
A
free
consultation
was
held
with
the
rocklife
park
residents
association
as
part
of
the
city's
pre-consultation
pilot
program,
and
the
rpra
has
noted
concerns
with
the
height
and
massing
of
the
proposed
dwelling
heritage.
Ottawa
was
also
notified
of
this
application.
K
K
So,
as
noted
prior
to
the
presentation,
an
additional
condition
is
proposed
to
be
attached
to
the
recommendations.
This
will
permit
the
city
to
further
assess
the
relationship
between
the
proposed
dwelling
and
the
neighboring
grade.
One
dwellings
staff
are
satisfied
that
the
proposed
dwelling
in
the
relationship
is
appropriate,
but
this
additional
condition
will
just
give
us
some
extra
time
to
ensure
that
the
requirements
of
the
rocklin
park
hcd
plan
are
met
in
full.
K
So
the
recommendations
as
otherwise
recommended
are
to
approve
the
application
to
demolish
the
building
at
540
lakehurst
road,
with
the
aforementioned
condition
to
approve
the
application
to
construct
a
new
building
of
540
lakehurst
road.
Again
with
that
condition
to
approve
the
landscape
design
for
the
new
building
conditional
upon
index
slider.
K
A
Thank
you
greg
for
that
very
in-depth
presentation.
We
did
receive
correspondence,
six
letters
that
were
submitted
to
the
clerk's
office
as
well
as
a
letter
from
heritage
ottawa.
We
have
a
number
of
registered
speakers
and
I
think
what
I'll
do
is
I'll,
just
group
them
to
people
who
want
to
speak
to
this
specific
file
and
then
at
the
end,
I
will
call
upon
the
people
who
might
just
want
to
be
available
to
answer
questions.
So
the
first
registered
speaker
is
b
hanson.
C
Thank
you
councillor,
king
and
bhc
committee,
members
and
staff,
and
after
much
deliberation
and
dialogue,
the
heritage
committee,
members
of
the
rpra
have
decided
to
mandate
our
chair
linda
decare,
to
present
our
views
to
the
bh
sc
today,
and
we
support
her
presentation
and
we
have
all
contributed
to
her
remarks
that
are
going
to
be
made
today.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
linda
is
our
representative
on
this.
L
Oh
there
we
go.
Thank
you,
sorry
about
that.
I
should
not,
by
this
stage,
be
able
to
handle
a
zoom
call.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
participate
and
I
was
asked
to
have
a
look
at
the
design
and
comment
on
it
and
was
surprised
to
hear
that
the
rockcliff
community
association
had
had
raised
concerns
about
the
project.
L
I
I
thought
that
in
a
lot
of
ways,
this
particular
design
really
captures
the
picturesque
principles.
It's
as
a
as
a
piece
of
architecture.
It
could
almost
be
illustrated
in
one
of
louden's
texts
on
on
horticulture.
It's
a
it's.
An
interesting
split,
split
massing
with
the
height
and
placement,
also
split
it
integrates
and
complements
you.
You
have
an
existing
mature
landscape
and
it
incorporates
that
mature
landscape
as
part
of
the
as
part
of
the
architecture.
L
The
materials
being
used
are,
are
all
noble
materials.
They
nice
quality,
there's
a
there's
a
play
between
the
east
and
the
west.
Building
the
with
the
west
building
set
at
a
lower
level
to
conform
with
the
building
beside
it
and
the
building
on
the
on
the
west
is
respectful
and
set
at
the
same
level
as
the
grade.
One
building
next
door:
it's
it's
a
it's
a
project
that
I
consider
nicely
done
it.
L
L
I
I
think
there
has
been
some
discussion
about
the
height
of
the
building
next
door,
but
I
understand
that,
when
the
documentation
on
the
existing
building
plans,
there
was
an
error
on
the
part
of
the
architect
of
that
existing
building
and
the
height
established
was
from
the
ground
floor
level,
as
opposed
from
the
geodetic
location.
So
in
fact
the
height
is
incorrectly
stated
within
the
with
the
within
the
documents
I
think
that'll
be
cleared
up
fairly
quickly
and
and
will
should
be
able
to
satisfy
that
particular
concern
of
the
rocklet
association.
A
M
M
A
A
M
I
would
like
to
simply
repeat
that
we
ask
that
the
city
issue
a
conditional
heritage
permit
permit
a
conditional
heritage
permit
allowing
the
applicant
to
discharge
the
condition
upon
the
submission
of
a
verified
height
survey
by
a
registered
land
surveyor
of
429
lansdowne
road,
north
and
confirmation
of
the
overall
height
of
the
proposed
building.
In
order
to
show
the
intended
height
limit
will
be
achieved.
C
N
I
approach
the
I
didn't
know
if
dylan
was
going
to
pick
up
on
it,
but
the
our
approach
to
the
landscape
design
was
that
the
landscaping
is
essentially
completed
on
the
house
and
we've
actually
worked
on
other
projects
in
rockcliff
over
the
years
where
we
were
we've
built
a
new
house
where
there
was
an
existing
house
and
there's
nothing
that
makes
the
house
seem
more
established
than
preserving
as
much
of
the
existing
landscaping
as
possible.
So
that's.
The
intention
is
to
basically
keep
as
much
of
the
existing
landscaping
as
possible.
N
We're
going
to
have
to
remove
some
of
the
woodland
landscaping
in
the
front
yard
area
that
a
lot
of
it,
which
is
on
the
city
right
away,
that
is
going
to
basically
be
compromised
due
to
the
servicing
of
the
site.
So
the
intention
was
basically
to
move
that
woodland
landscaping
or
that
foundation.
Planting
that's
at
the
front
of
the
house
and
move
it
basically
closer
towards
the
house
next
to
the
front
entrance
to
create
a
basically
to
frame
the
house
and
tie
it
to
the
ground.
Was
the
intention
really
but
yeah?
N
N
N
A
G
Fleming,
thank
you,
mr
chair
demolition
and
replacement
of
buildings
in
the
rockleft
park.
Heritage
conservation
district
offer
a
special
challenge
to
provide
a
new
building
with
a
design
that
harmonizes,
with
the
height
massive
and
scale
of
both
the
original
building
and
neighboring
homes
and
the
dominance
of
softscape
over
landscape.
G
We
feel
that
this
proposal
appears
to
meet
these
requirements
based
on
the
documentation.
However,
we
are
not
convinced
that
the
building
being
proposed
meets
the
requirements
under
the
plan,
and
we
therefore
feel
that
the
heritage
association
has
made
persuasive
consensus,
persuasive
concerns
that
should
be
addressed
about
the
actual
height
in
relation
to
the
existing
buildings.
G
A
E
Yes,
I
I
just
had
a
couple
of
quick
questions.
One
on
on
the
landscaping
I
notice
the
original
building
has
a
nice
mix
of
staged
landscape
that
extends
from
the
city
right
of
way
in
a
series
of
beds
that
tie
right
back
to
the
house,
which
is
quite
set
back,
whereas
the
new
proposal
seems
to,
as
the
architects
have
indicated,
mass
all
of
the
landscaping
along
the
front
facade
of
the
building.
E
K
Yes,
so
we
did
raise
that
with
the
applicant
and
due
to
the
majority
of
that
landscaping,
you're
speaking
of
existing
within
that
right-of-way,
some
of
that
can't
be
conserved
when
it
is
taken
up
to
allow
for
those
servicing
connections.
However,
the
applicant
has
agreed
to,
in
response
to
the
conditions
contained
in
the
report,
extend
the
landscaping
away
from
just
the
front
facade
of
the
house
and
out
towards
the
front
property
line
and
along
the
proposed
driveway
as
well.
So
there
will
be
additional
landscaping
beds
larger
than
those
contained
within
the
landscaping
plan.
K
K
According
following
that,
we
had
discussions
with
the
applicant
and
we
were
satisfied
that
the
heights
were
accurate.
However,
in
response
to
rock
park's
concerns,
we
wanted
to
add
this
additional
condition
simply
to
just
take
the
extra
step
get
a
little
bit
more
specific
information
on
the
subject,
property
and
the
adjacent
properties
relationship
to
confirm
that
those
requirements
of
the
hcd
plan
were
met
in
full.
D
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
with
staff,
so
if,
in
fact,
this
this
motion
is
passed
and
in
this
additional
condition
is
placed
on
the
heritage,
permit
you
know.
Typically,
I
realize
that
the
application
or
the
design
wouldn't
come
back
to
this
committee,
but
if,
if
you
were
to
find
that
the
hype
you
know
it
was
not
conforming
and
there
were
some
changes
to
the
design.
E
Mr
chair
I'll
take
this
question,
so
our
intention
here
would
be
with
this
motion
would
be
that
if
there
were
any
changes
required
to
the
design
that
they
would
be
dealt
with
through
the
recommendation
for
which
is
delegated
to
staff.
So
at
this
point
we
had
not
intended
to
bring
back
to
the
to
the
subcommittee.
That
being
said,
if
there
were
significant
changes
that
go
beyond
what
we
would
consider
to
be
minor
design
alterations,
then
it
would
be
required
to
come
back,
but
we
feel
fairly
comfortable
that
this
is.
A
D
A
Thank
you,
member
padelski,
for
your
comments,
and
I
would
like
to
echo
a
specific
comment:
around
staff
working
very
closely
and
diligently
with
the
rockcliff
park
residents
association
to
come
to
an
accommodation,
I'm
very
thankful
for
the
the
work
of
both
staff
and
the
residents
association
on
this
file.
So
if
there
are
no
other
comments
from
members,
is
the
motion
carried
all
right.
A
All
right,
karen,
thank
you
for
that
carried.
This
report
is
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
council
on
june
23rd.
The
fourth
item
in
front
of
us
is
an
application
to
alter
470
acacia
avenue,
a
property
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
located
in
the
rockcliff
park
heritage
conservation
district
can
staff.
Please
provide
an
overview
of
this.
A
H
Thank
you
through
youtube.
This
item
concerns
the
application
to
alta
470
acacia
avenue,
a
property
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
located
in
the
rockloff
park.
Heritage
conservation
district
next
slide,
please,
the
property
known
as
470
acacia
avenue
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
acacia
avenue
between
hillcrest
and
buena
vista
roads
in
the
rocklin
park.
Neighborhood,
as
the
map
on
the
right
of
the
slide
shows,
the
property
is
indicated
in
red,
meaning
that
it
is
classified
as
a
grade,
one
contributing
property
in
the
hcd
next
slide.
H
Please,
the
main
house
on
this
property
was
constructed
in
circa
1909
by
alan
kiefer.
In
the
tudor
revival
style,
it
is
a
two-story
residence
with
a
center
hall
plan
and
steeply
pitched
roof.
The
first
story
of
the
house
is
clad
in
stone
and
the
second
story
is
claddin
stucco
separated
by
wood
banding
next
slide.
Please.
H
A
large
wing
on
the
south
side
of
the
house,
added
in
1970
and
altered
in
1985,
contains
a
double
car
garage
and
clad
entirely
in
stucco
in
1993,
a
one-story
addition
was
constructed
at
the
rear
of
the
house.
The
landscape
features
of
the
property
are
typical
of
rocklife
park
and
match
those
of
its
neighbors
along
acacia
avenue.
H
The
front
yard
contains
several
mature
trees
and
a
semi-circular
driveway
next
slide.
Please,
the
applicant
is
proposing
several
alterations
to
the
property,
including
the
construction
of
an
in-ground
pool
in
the
rear
yard,
a
single
storey
lodgia
at
the
rear
of
the
house,
the
expansion
of
an
existing
rear
terrace
alterations
to
the
exterior
of
the
existing
home,
including
new
windows,
garage
doors
and
roof
canopies,
the
construction
of
a
one-story
and
two-story
rear
edition
to
replace
the
earlier
one-story
edition
constructed
in
1993
and
the
construction
of
a
detached
seasonal
garage
in
the
rear
yard.
H
The
following
slides
show
the
elevations
submitted
by
the
applicant.
The
waste
elevation
seen
here
shows
the
front
facade
of
the
house.
The
red
box
indicates
the
location
of
the
proposed
lodgia,
which
will
be
slightly
visible
from
the
front.
The
impact
of
the
lodgia's
visibility
is
mitigated
in
part
by
existing
landscape
features
in
the
front
yard.
H
H
This
rendering
shows
the
rear
of
the
house
as
proposed
with
additions
on
the
left
and
new
lodgia
on
the
right
next
slide.
Please,
heritage
staff
are
supportive
of
the
proposal
insofar
as
it
adheres
to
the
rocklet
park,
hcd
plan
guidelines
relating
to
conservation
and
maintenance
of
windows,
alterations
and
additions
to
existing
buildings,
garages
and
accessory
buildings
and
landscape
guidelines
for
new
buildings
and
additions.
H
Heritage
staff
are
supportive
of
the
applicant's
proposal
for
the
following
reasons:
the
alterations
proposed
to
front
and
rear
windows
will
be
compatible
with
the
original
home.
The
proposed
edition
will
be
subordinate
to
distinguishable
from
and
compatible
with
the
existing
building.
The
proposal
respects
the
heritage
attributes
of
the
original
home,
the
associated
streetscape
and
the
hcd.
H
H
Next
slide,
please,
the
plans
associated
with
this
application
were
posted
on
the
city's
development
application
search
tool.
The
rocklife
park
residents
association
heritage
committee
was
notified
of
the
application
and
provided
comments.
Heritage,
ottawa
and
neighbours
within
30
meters
were
also
notified
of
the
application
and
chair
king
is
also
aware
of
the
application
next
slide.
Please,
heritage
staff
are
recommending
approval
of
the
application
to
alta
470
acacia
avenue
heritage
staff
are
also
requesting
that
that
authority
be
delegated
for
minor
design
changes
and
that
the
heritage
permit
be
approved
with
a
two-year
expiry
date.
Next
slide.
A
A
F
D
A
A
G
A
Thank
you
again,
mr
fleming,
for
the
teeth
appearance,
especially
under
the
circumstances,
but
we
do
appreciate
you
being
here
with
us
any
questions
for
mr
fleming.
Seeing
none.
Does
the
committee
have
any
questions
for
staff
and
I
see
no
raised
hands?
Oh
I
do
see.
Vice
chair
quinn
has
raised
her
hand.
C
H
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
The
applicant
didn't
provide
heritage
staff
with
the
rendering
of
the
front,
but
we
feel
this
is
okay
in
the
circumstances,
because
very
very
minor
alterations
will
be
made
to
the
front
side
of
the
house.
It's
only
on
the
1970s
edition
that
some
windows
and
doors
will
be
changed.
A
Thank
you
for
that
question
and
comment
vice
chair
quinn,
and
I
actually
concur
with
you
that
we
should
get
all
the
renderings
before
us
when
we're
making
decisions
on
these
reports.
Are
there
any
other
questions
to
staff?
Seeing
none
do
any
of
the
members.
Have
any
general
comments
on
this
item
and
I
see
no
hands
raised,
so
is
this
report
carried
it's
carried?
A
This
report
is
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
council
on
june
23rd.
The
fifth
item
before
us
is
an
application
to
alter
saint
mark's
church
located
at
325
elgin
street,
a
property
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
in
the
mental
park
heritage
conservation
district
can
staff.
Please
provide
an
overview
of
this.
O
O
Good
morning,
this
is
an
application
to
alter
a
325
elgin
street,
a
property
located
in
the
mental
park.
Here's
conservation
district
next
slide,
please
this
property
known
as
saint
mark's,
united
church
or
iglesia
new
saint
mark,
is
located
at
the
edge
of
the
mental
park
hdd
at
the
intersection
of
elegant
and
lewis
streets.
O
Next
slide,
please,
the
church
was
constructed
in
1900
with
designs
by
an
aldi
and
ewert.
The
building
features
stone,
construction,
broad,
half,
timbered,
gables
and
a
corner
tower,
topped
with
a
pure
middle
roof.
The
church
is
a
key
corner,
landmark
landmark,
announcing
symbolic
entrance
to
mental
park,
which
contains
a
cohesive
streetscape
of
low-scale
buildings
surrounding
a
planned
square.
O
A
heritage
permit
for
this
bracing
was
issued
under
staff's
delegate
authority
in
november
2020
in
april,
2021
heritage
staff
were
informed
of
further
cracking
on
the
tower.
The
church's
engineer
noted
that
much
of
the
tower
must
be
dismantled
in
order
to
prevent
collapse
in
order
to
remedy
md.
An
unsafe
building
was
issued
by
building
code
services
on
april
9
2021,
with
with
direction
to
immediately
immediately
secure
the
tower
and
close
lewis
street
to
traffic,
despite
not
having
finalized
plans.
O
O
In
order
to
make
the
building
safe,
much
of
the
church
tower
needs
to
be
be
removed.
The
green
highlighted
section
of
the
image
shows
the
extent
of
the
proposed
demolition
next
slide
due
to
financial
constraints
and
the
urgency
of
this
work.
The
church
is
unable
to
commit
to
rebuilding
the
tower.
At
this
time.
Heritage
staff
have
therefore
been
working
with
the
property
owner
on
plans
for
an
alteration
to
the
church
building
to
accommodate
the
partial
demolition
of
the
tower
the
repositioning
of
the
entrance.
O
O
Given
the
safety
threat,
heritage
staff
do
not
eject
the
partial
demolition
providing
the
following
conditions
are
met,
a
all
usable
stones
are
documented
and
salvaged
b
salvage
stones
are
stored
and
protected
from
weather
c.
All
usable
stones
are
used
in
the
reconstruction
of
the
church
tower.
At
a
later
date
d,
the
church
entrance
is
rebuilt
in
accordance
with
plans
to
be
approved
by
staff
under
delegated
authority
e.
O
A
G
G
A
E
Thank
you
chair.
Just
a
quick
comment
on
the
design
that
was
proposed.
It
looks
as
though
the
base
of
the
tower
is
to
be
incorporated
into
that.
Well,
the
remaining
base
of
the
tower
is
to
be
incorporated
into
the
entrance
and
I
think
that's
a
very,
very
thoughtful
touch
to
salvage
what
what
can
be
from
this
unfortunate
incident.
I
live
around
the
corner
and
have
been
watching
it
over
the
past
year.
J
J
J
However,
I
think
that,
given
that
this
is
a
non-profit
charitable
organization
being
the
church,
the
city
might
want
to
actually
take
a
much
stronger,
proactive
initiative,
perhaps
engaging
with
the
city's
economic
development
department
and
its
partnership
program
to
seek
ways
in
which
the
church's
congregation's
objectives
and
sustenance
can
be
complemented
with
some
form
of
other
partnership.
That
would
bring
financing
to
this
property
in
order
to
not
only
reconstruct
the
tower
but
to
ensure
that
the
form
of
the
original
church,
which
is
part
of
this
landmark
location,
is
reassured
in
the
long
term.
J
I
don't
know
if
there
would
be
a
need
for
a
motion
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
to
engage
this
or
just
staff
assurance
or
council
mckinney's
insurance,
that
there
will
be
some
proactive
work
undertaken
by
the
city
to
try
to
mitigate
and
reinstate
the
value
that
this
landmark
has
contributed
to
center
town.
So
I
looked
to
councillor
kenny
to
comment
on
that.
C
C
Piece
of
architecture
on
on
elgin
street,
especially
and
as
we
know,
we've
got
other
properties
in
the
downtown-
include
the
neighboring
ward,
two
neighboring
wards
where
we've
lost
the
heritage,
properties,
parts
of
them
and
we
have
no
assurance
of
of
reparation
or
rebuild.
So
I
think
that
in
this
case,
the
fact
that
we
are
retaining
the
stones,
the
brickwork
and
that
there
are,
you
know
significant
conditions
being
placed
on
the
property
owners.
C
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
was
trying
to
I
don't
raise
my
hand
very
often
in
these
meetings,
so
I
was
like
trying
to
find
the
button
and
I
thought
you
can
probably
see
me
so
I'll
just
physically
raise
my
hand,
just
maybe
before
mr
pillow
comments.
I
would.
I
would
just
say
that
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
pieces
of
this
puzzle
that
are
still
to
come.
This
report
has
been
brought
forward
due
to
the
urgency
and
the
safety
issues.
E
It's
a
gathering
place
and
and
we're
hoping
to
try
to
do
what
we
can
through
this
application
to
allow
it
to
continue
to
function
as
a
church.
So
we
will,
we
will
be
assisting
them.
You
know,
however,
we
can
to
to
you
know
not
put
an
undue
burden
on
them
and
to
hopefully
the
building
can
remain
as
a
church
in
years
to
come,
so
we'll
be
engaging
with
our
building
code
services,
colleagues
and
our
colleagues
throughout
the
planning,
economic
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development
department
to
see
what
we
can
do.
A
A
There
are
no
in-camera
items
to
date
and
there
is
an
information
previously
distributed
before
us
concerning
the
proposed
alexandra
bridge
replacement
on
this
on
this
file.
If
there
is
any
deliberation
that
is
required,
it
would
require
a
vote.
So
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
members
were
interested
in
having
any
deliberation
on
this
item
or
are
simply
willing
to
accept
it,
as
is.
J
J
What
two
questions
one
is
do:
is
the
city
actually
going
to
be
able
to
obtain
all
the
documentation
that
has
been
prepared
by
public
services,
procurement,
canada?
I
noticed
that
there
was
reference
to
a
single
2018
report,
but
there
are
five
other
reports
that
are
known
that
deal
with
the
condition
of
the
alexandra
bridge,
prepared
by
wsp
engineering
and
also
other
firms
like
mmn
engineering
that
were
absorbed
by
wsb.
A
I
suppose,
before
we
go
too
much
further,
I
just
want
to
also
confirm
with
our
committee
coordinator
whether
that
is
a
question
more
of
clarification
or
whether
that
really
kind
of
constitutes
more
deliberation
on
this
motion.
Since
these
these
information
items
that
come
before
us,
these
information
previously
distributed
items
typically
do
require
a
vote
for
consideration.
So
I
just
wanted
to
see
get
eric's
opinion
on
this.
If
these
questions
could
be
asked
or
whether
it
does
require
that
a
two-thirds
majority
vote
for
for
deliberation.
A
Slash
commission
shall
not
consider
any
report
information
previously
distributed
memorandum
or
any
matter
that
has
not
been
distributed
to
the
members
with
the
agenda
and
whereas
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
has
received
a
public
submission
in
respect
to
the
proposed
alexandria
bridge
replacement
file,
number
quoted
listed
as
information
previously
distributed
a
on
this
meeting's
agenda,
as
well
as
an
expressed
interest
in
speaking
to
the
matter
or
answering
questions.
Should
the
committee
wish
to
discuss
the
item
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that,
pursuant
to
section
89
3
of
the
procedure
bylaw,
the
built
heritage
subcommittee?
A
A
J
J
E
P
Great
thank
thanks.
Leslie.
Can
everyone
hear
me?
Okay,
okay,
it's
a
bit
where
I'm
in
my
apartment
today,
so
there's
a
fan
going
as
well.
So
yes,
thank
you
through
you,
mr
chair.
We
have
had
some
great
conversations
with
our
colleagues
in
pspc
so
far
and
they
have-
and
I
should
say
they
should.
They
have
also
shared
with
us.
A
number
of
reports
that
have
been
completed
on
the
bridge.
J
Yes,
my
second
question
is
that,
in
the
information
that
was
provided
to
the
military
subcommittee,
the
staff
were
confident
that
the
potential
designation
of
the
alexandria
bridge
would
be
likely
to
qualify
under
the
interior
heritage
act
regulations,
and
is
there
any
hesitation
by
staff
to
actually
proceed
with
the
report
to
bring
to
build
here?
The
sub-canadian
council
designation
report.
P
P
So
yeah
just
to
clarify
thanks
for
the
question
member
padelski,
so
in
the
in
the
memo
that
we
provided,
we
wanted
to
be
clear
that
you
know
this.
The
bridge
the
alexandra
bridge
has
municipal
cultural
heritage,
value
and
significance,
and
I,
I
would
say
national
significance
as
well,
and
it
would
likely
merit
designation
under
under
part
four.
However,
there
are
some
jurisdictional
issues,
given
that
this
is
a
federally
owned
asset,
so
it
would
be
beyond
the
city's
jurisdiction
to
bring
forward
a
part.
4
designation
under
the
heritage
act.
A
A
If
there
are
no
other
questions,
we
can
move
on
with
the
end
of
the
agenda
notices
of
motion,
there
have
been
none
to
date,
submitted
inquiries.
There
have
been
none
to
date
under
other
business.
There
are
two
planning
circulations
on
the
agenda
which
were
distributed
to
members
prior
to
the
meeting.
Members
of
the
public
have
the
opportunity
to
comment
through
devops
on
ottawa.ca
the
city
of
ottawa's
website,
an
ontario
heritage
act.
Application
would
be
considered
at
a
later
date
on
the
planning
circulations.