►
Description
Community and Protective Services Committee – October 17, 2013 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
B
Good
morning,
everyone
thank
you
very
much
for
joining
us
this
morning
and
welcome
to
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee.
This
is
gender
28
today
for
Thursday
the
17th
of
October
2013
for
those
of
us
joining
today
who
are
going
to
be
speakers
or
signed
up
to
be
speakers
and
I.
Think
we
only
have
one
at
this
point
would
remind
you
when
you
come
forward
to
speak.
Please
make
sure
you
use
the
microphone
at
the
table
because
the
committee
is
audio
cast,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
folks
on
the
Internet
can
hear
your
deputation.
B
So
with
that
I
will
call
the
committee
to
order
and
members
of
committee.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interest
nope
see
none.
Thank
you.
Confirmation
of
minutes,
minutes,
27,
September,
19
2013
that
carry
thank
you
we'll
go
through
a
brief
consent
agenda.
We
have
two
presentations
today
from
emergency
and
Protective
Services.
B
Apart
from
that,
we
have
no
presentations
planned,
but
staff
available
to
answer
questions
if
necessary,
I,
don't
know
the
one
commemorative
naming
Kenneth
J
Watkins
pathway
in
Statesville.
The
report
has
been
circulated
and
this
has
gone
through
the
proper
commemorative
naming
procedure.
There
were
no
objections
obtained
during
the
comment
period
and
counselor
cadres
in
support
of
us
in
his
work.
Can
we
carry
this?
Thank
you
very
much
status
update
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
increase
in
motions
for
the
period
ending
10,
October
2013.
B
All
of
these
three
I
think
there's
three
of
them
and
they're
on
track
to
be
responded
to.
May
we
receive
this
report
see
thank
you,
City
operations,
community
and
social
services
department,
community
funding
update
this
is
an
administrative
report
from
community
and
social
services
on
the
community.
Funding
parcel
that
they're
required
to
bring
back
is
circulated
with
the
agenda
in
advance.
Would
anybody
like
to
hold
this
or
may
we
catch
cold
for
a
question?
B
Did
that
for
councillor
for
you
for
a
question:
I,
don't
number
for
collaboration
the
efficiency
opportunities
within
emergency
services.
The
final
report:
this
is
the
report
between
Police
Service,
the
fire
service,
the
paramedic
service,
to
discuss
how
they
can
more
efficiently
integrate
with
each
other
and
operate.
C
D
I've
seen
in
that
report,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
work
has
been
done
to
this
item.
Mr.
chair
and
all
Department.
It
seems
working
together,
which
is
great
news
to
their
city.
But
when
you
talk
about
the
protocol
for
call
for
service,
and
when
would
we
see
a
report,
how
how
we
achieved
that
collaboration
act
like
perhaps
when
you
say
we
had
a
hundred
call
attended
by
so
many
and
then
cans.
E
Yes
to
the
charity
when
comes
to
action,
Terri
part
of
our
work
over
the
next
year
is
to
begin
to
measure
the
performance
and
then
look
at
those
numbers.
It
is
I
intend
to
come
back
in
early
2015
and
show
you
the
difference.
We're
also
reporting
numbers
in
terms
of
calls
for
responding
through
each
of
the
annual
reports
for
fire
and
paramedics
as
well.
Please
and
I
think
we'd
mention
any
report.
We
can
already
see.
D
D
E
B
You
very
much
mr.
deputy
mayor,
so
is
this
item
received
receipt
number
five
and
six
those
presentations
from
those
and
I
believe
we
have
a
speaker
on
item
number,
six
that
leaves
us
item
number
seven
Community,
Partnership
major
capital
program,
summary
of
funding
allocations
again
published
online
last
week,
an
circulated
with
the
report.
May
we
recommend
council
approve
this
listing.
B
Minor
capital
program
summary
funding
allocations,
the
same
scenario
as
the
major
may.
We
recommend
council
receive
this
listing
of
projects
funded
through
the
program
received.
Thank
you,
I
PDS,
to
receive
information
previously
distributed
a
vehicle
growth
summary
for
2014
and
a
pilot
program
extension
of
standing
offer
to
not-for-profit
organizations
which
I'm
quite
proud
of,
because
that
was
my
idea
received.
B
F
A
In
terms
of
how
the
components
fit
together
within
community
funding
versus
the
investments
we
place
in
homelessness
and
housing,
the
homelessness
housing
money
largely
comes
from
the
federal
and
the
provincial
coffers.
It's
about.
70
percent
of
those
dollars
are
housing
related
30
percent
of
the
topic
in
community
funding.
It's
essentially
a
hundred
percent
municipal
dollars,
and
these
are
the
areas
where
we
choose
to
invest
in
specific
community
development
type
projects.
A
B
Thank
you
very
much
dr.
berry
and
councillor
flurry
so
with
that.
Is
this
item
carried
carried?
Thank
you
very
much.
That
leaves
this
item
number
six.
There.
Five
I'm,
sorry
bylaw
regulatory
services,
2012
annual
report,
so
chief
Anderson's
with
us
today,
as
well
as
christine
heartache
from
her
shop
and
chief,
we'll
turn
it
over
to
you
and
they
have
a
presentation
on
bylaws.
First
ever
was
going
to
be
annual
report
so
proceed
whenever
you're,
ready.
G
Good
morning
we
are
pleased
and
honored
to
be
able
to
present
to
you
our
first
ever
annual
report
for
our
branch.
The
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
branch
is
committed
to
achieving
compliance
with
municipal
standards
and
to
providing
other
services
that
contribute
positively
to
the
quality
of
life
in
our
city,
the
branches
I'm
sorry
I
have
jumped
ahead.
Sorry
I
have
to
give
you
background.
First,
our
branch
is
part
of
the
city's
emergency
and
Protective
Services
Department,
and
it
consists
of
four
divisions,
enforcement,
East
and
West,
our
licensing
permits
and
markets
group
and
parking
enforcement.
G
Our
branch
also
manages
and
operates
the
Byward
and
Parkdale
markets
and
our
spay/neuter
clinic
the
policy
and
administration
staff
supports
all
four
divisions
with
reports
and
bylaw
development
and
interpretation
services,
as
well
as
logistics
and
despatch
services.
Together,
these
divisions
assist
the
city
and
serving
over
935,000
residents.
Thousands
of
businesses
and
almost
ten
million
tourists
annually.
G
Our
branch
marriage
is
the
administration
or
enforcement,
or
both
of
over
50
miscible
bylaws
and
a
number
of
provincial
acts.
To
give
you
an
example
of
some
of
the
issues
that
were
involved
with,
we
reinforced
the
traffic
and
parking
bylaw
noise,
bylaw
property
standards
and
property
maintenance,
the
smoke-free
regulations
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
issues
surrounding
fences
and
business
and
watery
licensing.
G
As
a
perceived
center
of
expertise
and
regulatory
met
that
matters,
the
branch
works
collaboratively
with
many
city
departments
and
external
service
providers.
For
example,
a
parking
unit
supports
transit
services
and
keeping
the
bus
routes
clear
and
the
Public
Works
Department
and
its
snow
removal
and
snow
clearing
operations
in
2012.
G
The
branch
markets
unit
works
in
partnership
with
farmers
and
farmers
market
Ontario,
saver
market
stakeholders,
including
the
Byward
market,
stand
holders
association,
the
residents,
businesses
and
the
Byward
reader
and
Wellington
West
Business
Improvement
area
in
May
of
2012.
The
branch
developed
a
partnership
with
Talent
the
townand
it
down
committee,
which
represents
21
universities
and
35
communities
across
the
province
and
our
branch,
assisted
in
the
formation
of
Ottawa's.
G
First,
an
endowed
committee
at
Ottawa
University
in
2012,
the
bylaw
branch
worked
with
its
public
health
partners
in
the
establishment
of
the
expanded
smoke
free
space
regulations
that
saw
all
city
properties
become
smoke-free.
The
taxi
by
law
was
reenacted
to
include
a
number
of
amendments
to
improve
service
to
the
general
public
to
wrists
and
our
disabled
communities
in
May.
G
Our
branch
put
forward
a
report
that
amended
the
current
noise
by
law
to
include
tenants
and
resident
property
owners
in
the
mitigation
of
noise
disturbances
occurring
on
their
properties.
These
amendments
were
approved
by
council
and
have
shown
to
be
very
effective
actually
in
the
last
year,
council
also
approve
proposals
with
respect
to
the
new
street
food
vending
program
that
established
up
to
20
new
food
vendors
on
the
city
streets,
a
very
front-and-center
program.
We
are
pleased
to
report
that
there
of
the
20
spaces
17
are
currently
operational.
G
G
Review
of
the
statistics
from
2001
to
2012
in,
but
the
areas
that
have
experienced
the
most
significant
growth
in
request
for
service
are
parking
control
which
increased
45%
over
that
time
period.
Property
standards
which
increased
from
2,800
calls
to
9000
representing
over
200%
and
zoning,
which
increased
from
83
calls
in
2001
to
1982
in
2012.
G
With
respect
to
Moyes
and
Animal,
Care
and
Control
are
depicted
in
these
graphs
since
2001.
The
number
of
requests
for
service
to
which
the
branch
has
responded
has
increased
from
56,000
to
the
current
day,
almost
seventy
nine
thousand,
which
is
a
forty
six
point.
Seven
percent
increase
in
eleven
years
in.
G
Addition,
the
Markus
management
team
at
byword
fielded
close
to
twenty
eight
thousand
enquiries
in
2012,
which
is
up
18%
from
2011,
which
goes
some
way
to
showing
how
vibrant
the
market
area
is.
During
2012,
the
licensing
unit
issued
over
18,000
business
licenses
and
processed
over
five
hundred
and
twenty-five
lottery
licenses.
G
The
unit
also
conducted
2200
taxi
inspections
and
130
limousine
inspections
and
inspected
200
food
trucks
and
carts
over
370
thousand
parking
and
fraction
notices
were
issued
in
2012,
which
resulted
in
19
million
revenue
by
line
regulatory
services
continue
to
maintain
a
strong
working
partnership
with
the
city's
Provincial
Offences
court,
including
our
coordination
with
the
implementation
of
the
private
parking
enforcement
agencies.
Cost-Sharing
agreements,
which
explains
the
increase
in
the
number
of
parking
tickets
that
were
issued
so
by
early
2012.
We
had
agreements
in
place
with
many
private
agencies
for
the
issuance
of
city
parking
tickets,.
G
During
2012,
a
branch
implemented
a
number
of
service
changes
internally,
which
supports
the
city
service,
excellent
initiative
of
achieving
a
positive
experience
for
our
clients.
The
residents,
the
majority
of
the
business
licensing
services,
were
decentralized
from
Ben
Franklin
place
and
are
now
delivered
at
all
seven
client
service
centers
across
the
city
of
Ottawa.
This
resulted
in
improved
services
to
the
residents
and
the
businesses
with
more
convenient
locations
and
expanded
service
hours.
It
also
represented
operational
efficiencies
for
the
City
of
Ottawa.
G
As
part
of
that
counter
consolidation,
the
service
counter
at
735
industrial,
was
reopened
for
the
license
category
that
our
branch
continued
to
provide
service.
For
so
such
things
as
taxis,
limousines
still
are
managed
through
the
our
branch,
and
we
are
a
staff
in
our
branch,
moved
to
the
central
location
of
735
industrial.
G
The
activities
of
the
city's
long-standing
spay/neuter
clinic
are
coordinated
by
licensed
veterinarian
using
the
industry
standards
and
best
practices.
The
cost
recovery
clinic
offers
an
accessible
and
affordable
service
to
the
residents
of
Ottawa
in
support
of
the
C's
service.
Excellent
goal
to
improve
client
experiences.
This
clinic
amended
its
post-operative
operative
pet
pickup
hours
in
2012
and
were
able
and
extended
the
hours
in
order
to
allow
pet
owners
to
pick
their
animals
up
at
the
end
of
the
day,
rather
than
midday
after
surgery.
G
G
In
support
of
the
branches
goal
to
create
an
engaged
workforce,
we
also
launched
two
staff
committees,
the
service
excellence
committee
and
the
Diversity
Committee.
The
service
excellent
committee
mandate
is
to
provide
staff
an
opportunity
to
bring
forward
their
ideas
on
ways
to
improve
areas
of
concern
identified
by
the
results
of
the
2001
staff
survey,
2011
staff
survey.
Through
its
various
subcommittees
and
working
groups.
The
service
excellence
committee
helped
to
establish
a
new
deployment
schedule
to
better
respond
to
service
requests.
G
The
Diversity
Committee
mandate
mandate
is
to
provide
a
welcoming,
diverse
and
respectful
workplace
and
all
the
work
that
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
performs
and
to
improve
diversity
through
recruitment
and
retention
strategies,
so
that
our
workforce
is
reflective
of
the
population
that
we
serve.
Committee
members
have
established
an
outreach
and
community
engagement
initiative
focused
on
increasing
the
branch's
profile
at
various
job
fairs
across
the
city
and
local
educational
institutions,
promoting
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
as
a
potential
career
path.
G
B
B
What
you
do
I
know,
folks
in
the
uniform
profession,
aren't
really
used
to
taking
victory
laps,
but
but
I
think
you
do
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and
have
a
wonderful
team
and
a
you
know
for
a
very
small
team
deliver
a
lot.
So
congratulations
on
not
just
a
report.
Of
course.
Thank
you
for
all
of
the
work
that
you
do.
B
H
I,
thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair.
This
is
a
great
report
and
I
do
appreciate
it.
I
just
have
two
very
simple
questions,
and
one
may
be.
We
won't
be
able
to
answer,
but
almost
seems
to
have
a
very
high
number
of
infractions
being
issued
compared
to
other
cities
is
the
reason
for
that?
Is
it
based
on
the
volume
cause
we
go
through
three
one
one.
What
do
you
think
that
is.
G
In
terms
of
so
in
terms
of
parking
enforcement,
our
numbers
have
trended
pretty
consistently.
Over
the
years
we
have
a,
we
have
a
very
concentrated
downtown
core
and
we
have
a
large
large.
Suburban
population
tends
to
travel
into
the
downtown
core
on
a
daily
basis.
So
the
majority
of
the
tickets
that
are
issued
on
Street
our
downtown
core
tickets,
because
parking
is
so
rare
and
difficult
to
find
in
the
downtown
core,
and
those
numbers
have
been
fairly
steady
and
in
terms
of
issuing
what
we
call
part
ones
or
peel
wins,
or
charges
for
fractions.
G
H
I
appreciate
that
and
I
completely
understand
you
have
to
catch
people
that
is
more
of
an
awareness
campaign,
education
campaign-
that's
probably
a
completely
different
narrative
to
speak
to
that
I'm.
Just
raising
it,
because
a
constituent
I
walked
around
with
last
week
for
an
hour
identified
a
lot
of
litter
and
a
certain
area
and
I
thought
it
would
be
best
to
ask
that
question.
But
thank
you
very
much
chef
for
the
your
report.
F
Since
we're
talking
about
the
numbers,
councillor,
Holmes
and
I,
have
when
we
look
at
the
chart,
I
think
in
in
the
three
biggest
categories
we
have
most
I,
don't
know
if
it's
some
infractions
that
I
would
but
property
standards
noise
graffiti.
We
have
most
reports.
I
have
to
start
by
saying.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
mean
over
a
year
now
we
did
some
changes
to
the
noise.
Bylaw
we've
seen
wonderful
success.
F
Recently,
the
vacant
buildings
I
think
that
that
is,
there's
a
lot
there
to
be
desired
and-
and
we
see
some
positive
outcomes
there,
so
I
want
to
thank
Christine
yourself
and
the
department
Valerie.
We
work
with
you
and
making
sure
that
these
changes
were
meaningful
and
also
impactful
in
the
community.
G
Quite
correct
the
council,
as
we've
said
previously,
a
lot
of
it
has
to
do
with
the
density
of
the
areas
of
those
two
wards.
In
addition
to
that,
there's
probably
a
higher
ratio
of
tenants
and
the
towards
than
there
are
in
other
locations,
property
standards,
property
standards
itself
tends
to
be
at
or
that
is
needed
by
tenants
when
the
landlord
is
not
maintaining
the
property,
particularly
inside.
G
So
the
more
tenants
you
have
in
a
the
higher
that
that
number
of
complaints,
property
maintenance
has
to
do
with
the
external
area,
and
when
you,
you
know,
as
we
promised
previously,
we
we
have
rolled
out
a
proactive
program
where
one
officer
a
day
will
be
patrolling
the
two
wards
to
stay
on
top
of
those
issues.
Noise.
G
Again,
it's
it's
the
it's
the
very
close
quarters
of
the
wards,
and
you
know,
quite
frankly,
the
closer
you
are
to
a
secondary,
an
institution
for
secondary
education,
probably
the
more
issues
you're
going
to
have
surrounding
noise
interfering
with
with
the
residents
that
generally
live
in
the
area.
So
we're
not
we're
not
surprised
by
the
numbers.
You
will
notice,
probably
in
the
church,
that
the
complaints
about
dogs,
for
instance,
are
much
lower
in
those
words
than
there
would
be
a
more
suburban
Ward's,
where
there's
more
dog
ownership.
The
dogs
are
out
more.
G
F
I
would
also
like
to
see
service
Ottawa,
there's
been
a
lot
of
progress.
There's
been
a
lot
of
changes,
a
lot
of
changes
that
have
been
very
positive
but
there's
still
gaps
and
the
gaps
are
late
in
the
evening
when
the
service
closes
down
and
there's.
Also
recently,
we've
seen
service
requests
come
through
Twitter,
so
we
also
have
to
recognize
that
those
upcoming
challenges
that
bylaw
services,
but
other
sectors
of
our
city
operations
will
need
to
respond.
But
that
said
wonderful
report.
C
A
G
G
Non
parking
so,
for
instance,
on
noise,
there
are
certain
words
in
the
city
where
the
decision
has
been
made
that
that
the
issuance
of
charges
will
be
be
proactive
and
we
will
be
laying
charges
because
it
has
been
shown
to
be
the
most
effective
way
to
deal
with
the
problem.
In
other
situations,
we
would
speak
to
the
people
to
the
homeowner
or
whoever
is
making
excessive
noise
and
have
that
discussion,
and
often
that's
sufficient
for
them
to
become
aware
of
it
and
not
have
a
rule
piece.
So
we
call
that
a
warning.
G
It's
all
documented,
if
you
take
an
issue
like
dog
barking.
The
first
response
we
have
when
we
could
receive
the
first
complaint
of
the
dog
barking
is
to
send
a
letter
to
them
to
the
person
say:
we've
had
a
complaint
about
this.
Here
are
some
suggestions
on
how
you
may
reduce
your
dog
barking?
If
we
don't
get
any
other
complaint,
then
we
don't
have
to
go
out
and
spend,
spend
money,
valuable
resources
to
go
and
deal
with
the
issue.
G
However,
if
we
receive
a
second
complaint
and
we
go
out
and
actually
visit
with
the
person
have
a
discussion,
give
them
an
official
warning
and
if
we
receive
a
third
complaint
at
that
point,
we
lay
charges.
So
each
category
that
we
deal
with
each
individual
situation
we
deal
with
is
different
and
unique.
So
there's
no
set
way
that
we
do
it
particularly.
G
However,
as
I
said,
we
prefer
to
bring
about
voluntary
compliance
for
many
different
reasons.
First
and
foremost,
we're
not
here
to
be
punitive
against
the
residents
of
the
City
of
Ottawa,
but
secondly,
as
soon
as
you
issue
a
charge
you're
entering
into
a
court
process
that
is
expensive
both
for
the
recipient
of
the
ticket
and
for
the
city
itself.
So
if
we
can
resolve
the
without
having
to
go
through
that
process,
we
always
prefer
to
do
it.
That
way.
G
Yes,
there's
a
property
standard
situation
where
we
have
a
tenant.
The
officer
always
asked
the
tenant.
Have
you
spoken
to
your
landlord
or
property
manager
about
this
problem
and,
depending
on
you
know,
oftentimes
the
person
will
say
no
I'm
not
comfortable
doing
that
or
no
I
haven't
yet
so
we'll
encourage
them
to
do
that.
So
yes,
we
ask
people,
have
you
spoken
to
your
neighbor
in
some
situations,
they're
not
comfortable
doing
that
or
in
other
situations
they
they're
not
absolutely
sure
where
the
barking
dog
is
so.
G
C
And
I
think
Ottawa
is
more
like
that
than
some
other
cities,
because
I
know
we
get
many.
Many
of
these
calls.
We
always
try
to
impress
upon
the
caller
that
if
they
think
it's
uncomfortable
speaking
to
their
neighbor
they're
going
to
find
it
far
more
uncomfortable
when
the
neighbor
gets
a
ticket
instead
and-
and
that's
usually
the
case
because
neighbors
figure
out
who
the
complainant
is
so
I.
B
G
G
So
you
know
there's
many
different
reasons
that
our
call
volumes
may
be
higher
than
other
communities.
Also,
we,
you
know
demographically.
It
shows
that
you
know,
we've
got
a
higher
higher
educated
population
had
been
some
other
municipalities
and
people
that
are
higher
higher
higher
education,
become
aware
of
what
the
rights
are,
what
services
are
available
for
them
in
the
community?
So
there's
many
reasons
why
I
you
know
I
I,
don't
have
a
study
on
it,
but
our
senses
are
there's
many
reasons
that
we
receive
a
lot
of
calls.
D
D
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
thank
you
Miss
Anderson
for
your
report
and
also
a
congratulation
to
be
the
second
lowest
enforcement
operating
costs
in
the
envelope
or
so
you're
right.
We
operate
under
a
good
success
with
that
area,
now
slide
number
five
and
our
public
health
to
develop
and
implement
smoke-free
strategy,
I
think
no
counselor,
home
and
I.
We
have
inquiry
with
there,
but
the
public-house
understand
about
this
Mori
yeah,
because
some
concern
came
from
business
owner.
There's
some
of
the
shisha
been
searched
not
most
of
it
or
all
of
it
is
horrible.
D
But
if
we're
talking
about
smoke
free
so
doesn't
matter
what
we
serve
but
they're
horrible.
Oh
man,
why
we
still
have
over
22
establishment
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
publicly
and
promote
the
she
show
the
hooker
smoke.
Can
you
can
you
tell
me
where?
Where
is
that
strategy
with
the
public
health
fit
today,
I'm.
G
D
G
However,
these
strategies
that
there
were
there
related
to
tobacco
smoke
only
I
do
know
that
our
Public
Health
is
working
with
the
province
on
the
issue
of
shisha,
and
you
know
we
played
the
role
of
doing
reinforce
and
once
Public
Health
has
moved
forward
with
regulations
and
in
conjunction
with
the
province
and
what
our
authority
is.
But
I'll
leave
that
question
to
be
answered
by
our
public
health,
but
I
I
know
they
were
trying
to
address
that
issue.
D
G
D
Mr.
chair,
for
almost
almost
to
you
and
I,
think
the
first
inquired
it
comes
to
home
and
I
will
put
forward,
and
it
doesn't
seem
with
any
any
advance
in
that
air
that
we
talked
about
implementing
a
smoke-free
on
the
beach
on
a
public
owned
property,
which
is
fine,
but
we
still
is
allowed
in
license
established
by
the
city.
So
really
we
need
to
act
on
this
item
and
again
ask
this
committee
to
work
with
the
public
health
and
tell
us.
When
is
the
last
time
they
visit
those
establishment?
B
Counselor
then
I
think
staff
would
be
prepared
to
take
that
as
direction
to
come
back
and
provide
committee
with
you
know,
with
an
explanation
as
to
what
they
find
in
terms
of
you
know
how
they
would,
how
they
would
foresee
policing
this
and
and
the
costs
associated
with
it.
And
then
we
can
have
the
debate
about
where
those
costs
should
come
from.
You
know
and
the
labor
involved.
So
so,
if
you're
comfortable
with
that,
we
can
direct
staff
to
bring
that
back
before
us.
Okay,.
D
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
but
just
for
the
record
we've
been
waiting
for
this
for
two
years.
Exactly
the
last
inquire.
Mr.
Locarno
answer
it
this
week
and
he
copied
comes
their
home
and
I
on
it,
and
that
was
the
quest
for
information
goes
back
to
August
and
the
one
before
that
from
last
year.
So
I
would
urge
that
Israeli,
Lee
and
mr.
O'connor
to
work
together
and
just
give
us
it
was
a
horrible
and
that's
fine.
D
So
at
least
we
can
answer
to
the
rest
of
the
businesses,
whose
ask
him
ask
those
questions
because
and
sir
deputy
mayor
who's
in
charge
of
the
BIA.
Is
that
question
often
from
the
BAS
y1
business
I
love
to
serve
xuxa
and
others
not
sure,
and
that's
a
really
constructive
trust.
You
too,
to
play
fair
with
everybody,
Thank
You
mr.
Wright.
I
I
G
Has
an
impact
as
well
and
in
the
bench
Awards
we
have.
For
instance,
we
have
zero
tolerance
in
terms
of
noise
because
of
the
density
and
the
closest
of
the
buildings.
We
have
a
pro
inspection
of
for
yard
maintenance.
Now,
so
we
are
aware
that
we've
also
made
changes
to
our
deployment
of
officers
to
ensure
that
we
took
a
look
at
the
call
volume
generally
and
we,
you
know,
we've
seen
a
significant
increase
in
the
class
coming
in
say
after
10
or
11
o'clock
at
night.
G
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
rejigged
our
shifts
so
that
we
now
have
more
officers
on
at
night
and
for
the
most
part
those
officers
are
working
in
the
downtown
wards.
So
it's
unlikely
to
get
a
call
for
a
dog
at
large
at
midnight,
but
it's
quite
likely
to
get
five
calls
for
noise
and
anti
downtown
Ward.
I
Ivan,
in
my
opinion,
we
don't
solve
the
problem
on
call
number
one.
We
don't
go
and
issue
a
ticket
on
call
number
one.
We
wait
till
call
number
five.
So,
of
course
we
get
more
calls
because
the
neighborhood
is
getting
more
and
more
upset
and
more
people
are
calling
in
and
their
car
volume
goes
up.
So
is
there
a
technique
and
a
strategy
to
try
and
deal
with
this
at
the
beginning
of
the
scent
of
the
session
rather
than
two
days
later,.
G
Yes,
and
certainly
it
depends
on
as
I
said
previously,
it
depends
on
the
nature
of
the
call
so
for
noise,
we're
issuing
charges
in
the
first
response
and
the
urban
wards
and
are
in
terms
of
waste
in
terms
of
property
maintenance.
We
issue
notices
of
violation
to
the
owners
to
have
the
property
cleaned
up
in
a
short
period
of
time.
Okay,.
I
Like
council
Ferry
I've
been
asking
that
the
waste
inspectors
be
moved
over
to
join
bylaw
mr.
ken
Lucas
and
whereas
miss
Jones
I've
been
asking
her
for
about
six
years
to
get
those
waste
inspectors
over
into
some
controlled
category
like
like
them
dinner
at
the
bylaw
group,
is
that
everyone
happened.
J
Mr.
chair
we've,
actually
we
were
considering
doing
that.
I
know,
that's
been
something
that
the
council
has
been
pushing
for:
we've
had
discussions
and
direction
and
tweaking
on
the
waste
management
inspector
herself,
she
did
summers
Department
est,
I
wasn't
wanting
to
make
that
move
right
now,
because
things
seem
to
be
and
Mike
will
be
corrected
in
the
matter.
But
things
seem
to
be
working
much
better
in
terms
of
what
those
words
are
and
working
with,
while
all
they've
been
working
together
now
in
terms
of
farm
enforcement
in
terms
of
dealing
with
those
types
of
issues.
J
G
We
what
we
have
currently
working
is
the
solid
waste
inspectors,
respond
to
garbage
issues
Monday
to
Friday
date
on
the
buyer.
Officers
are
there
to
respond,
particularly
on
the
weekends,
because
there
was
a
hole
and
service
there,
because
the
solid
wastes
don't
work
on
the
weekends.
The
solid
waste
inspectors,
in
addition
to
responding
to
calls
about
garbage
being
out
too
early
too
late,
also
are
responsible
for
managing
the
contracts
for
the
as
companies
that
pick
up
the
garbage.
G
So
unfortunately,
it's
not
a
black-and-white,
they
do
more
than
just
respond
out
to
calls
from
the
citizens
about
the
garbage
at
the
curb,
and
so
there
has
been
some
challenges
there
with
that
on
the
weekends.
Of
course,
there
is
a
garbage
pickup,
so
it's
really
clear
for
the
bylaw
officers
just
to
be
dealing
with
the
garbage
at
the
curb
and
not
have
those
other
responsibilities
involving
the
contracts
for
the
carrot
for
the
pickup
companies.
So.
G
J
Just
what
is
that
something?
We're
thinking
is
so
well
it's
it's
effectively
the
contracts
that
that
are
out
there,
the
internal
contractor
than
the
vendors
that
one
there'll
be
this
there's
an
element
of
their
job
that
is
about
keeping
tabs
on
on
their
performance
against
that
contract.
So
it
goes
beyond
I'm.
Just
saying
this:
it's
if
the
disentangle
it
isn't
as
clear
cut
as
I
thought.
Initially,
when
you
first
raise
it
an
apartment
moved
over
to
me
a
year
and
a
half
ago
when
I
first
was
some
tagged
with
this
issue.
J
It
wasn't
as
clear-cut
to
disentangle
and
just
move
over
a
few
waist
inspectors
over
the
bottle
on
sale
promise.
All
cuz
I
still
had
a
whole
in
terms
of
dealing
with
service
level
standards.
Are
they
getting
to
all
the
streets?
Are
they
picking
up
where
they're
supposed
to
either
meeting
their
obligations
under
contract,
all
that
gets
fed
into
the
contract
management,
so
they're
being
they're
doing
multiple
purposes,
so
we've
been
working?
J
What
I
asked
them
to
do
and
they're
just
explained
I
asked
him
to
be
working
much
closer
together
with
by
law,
so
that
we
have
much
more
of
an
integrated
approach
in
terms
of
how
we
do
that
in
force
from
how
we
do
that
management.
The
tickets
are
up
for
my
recall,
but
they're
not
up
significantly.
There's.
I
G
Probably
yes,
work
for,
in
most
cases
it's
it's
the
City
of
Ottawa,
so
we
did
a
proactive
in
in
the
spring
and
actually
issued
them
as
I
recall,
hundreds
of
notices
of
violation.
That's
why
we
have
somebody
doing
proactive,
doing
a
award
and
council
fools
ward
proactively.
It
needs
to.
We
need
to
stay
on
top
of
it
on
a
daily
weekly
basis.
G
I
So
that's
a
pretty
sad
thing
to
say
that
we
gave
it
a
hundred
hundreds
of
tickets,
which
meant
we've
been
doing
that
thing
for
quite
a
long
time.
That
was
the
case
on
to
the
shisha,
madam,
and
we
were
doing
some
work
on
shisha
for
a
short
time,
but
we
have
to
work
with
the
federal
inspectors
because
they're,
the
ones
who
have
the
ability
to
take
samples
and
then
the
federal
labs
have
been
doing
the
work
for
us.
I
How
long
that
can
continue
seems
to
be
somewhat
problematic
and
so
and
and
the
province
tells
us
what
we
have
to
enforce
through
an
inspection.
We
have
to
do
so
many
restaurants,
so
that
nor
the
high
end
and
down
through
and
we
have
to
meet
specific
demands
of
the
province
and
shisha,
isn't
on
the
drawing
the
province.
So
you
know
we're
doing
what
we
are
mandated
to
do
and
have
to
report
to
the
province.
So
shisha
has
been
falling
through
the
cracks
for
several
reasons.
I
So,
yes,
public
health
is
working
with
the
province
to
try
and
get
some
better
control
of
that
some
better
definitions,
some
better
access
and
some
better
ability.
When
we
did
take
samples,
the
majority
were
tobacco,
so,
although
they
say
they're
horrible,
the
majority
of
the
samples
had
tobacco
in
them.
So
that's
a
problem
and
many
many
young
kids
are
going
because
it's
said
to
be
horrible
and
their
parents
don't
mind
because
it's
supposed
to
be
horrible
but
in
fact
we've
found
that
it
much
of
it
is
inaudible.
I
A
A
It's
a
first
of
annual
I'm
assuming
and
I
think
it's
information
that
needs
to
be
there
on
the
table
in
order
for
us
to
understand
your
challenges
as
well
as
what
the
communities
are
facing
on
a
you
know
as
we
grow
and
as
we
change
the
face
of
our
community
in
terms
of
in
my
area,
it's
just
like
in
the
downtown
area
the
intensity
growth
it
creates.
Some
of
those
issues
also
question
coming
back
to
your
slide.
Tin,
you
get.
A
G
Actually,
no
not
like
not
now
our
database
doesn't
allow
us
to
filter
that
down.
We
would
have
to
open
up
every
request
for
service
and
the
CD
officers
notes
to
figure
out
what
it
was
regarding.
So
we
don't
have
subcategories
for
noise
in
particular
to
a
certain
extent
we
do
with
animals
in
terms
of
dog
bites
and
dog
barking,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
in
in
terms
of
noise,
you
know
it's
just.
A
Noise
just
noise,
and
that
would
include
any
like
whether
it's
music
noise
or
whether
it's
noise
from
a
construction
site,
those
kind
of
calls
would
all
be
included
in
that
correct.
My
question
relates
to
item
number
five
coming
back
again
because
here
in
this
report
were
taking
the
noise
issue.
Noise
complaint
issue
back
to
you
in
terms
of
bylaw,
rather
than
you
know,
going
through
council,
at
least
that's
what
the
recommendation
of
the
report
is.
G
B
You
very
much
members
of
the
committee
have
any
other
questions
for
chief
Anderson.
No,
so
with
that,
then
may
we
receive
this
dialog
regulatory
services
annual
report
you
see.
Thank
you
very
much
and
now
for
return
engagements
chief.
You
off
began
to
talk
about
noise
dialogues,
emption
'z,
specifically
as
it
relates
to
construction
and
I.
Think
you
have
a
small
presentation
on
that
as
well.
G
Thank
you
having
to
present
two
reports
and
at
one
meeting
as
it's
a
bit
stressful,
but
let's
go
on
so
the
city
palawan
noise
by
law
regulates
construction
noise
and
requires
that
construction
vehicles
and
equipment
not
be
operated,
operated
between
10:00
p.m.
and
7:00
a.m.
money
to
Saturday
and
10:00
p.m.
and
9:00
a.m.
on
Sundays
and
statutory
or
holidays
public
holidays.
G
The
current
noise
bylaw
delegates
to
the
chief
of
Bilaam
regulatory
services,
the
authority
to
grant
exemptions
from
the
construction
related
regulations
for
no
more
than
11
calendar
days
per
year
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
noise
created
by
the
activity
does
not
exceed
90
decibels
from
the
point
of
reception
that
the
activity
will
not
continue
more
than
eight
hours
in
any
one
day
and
that
the
affected
ward
councillor
or
councillors
concurs
with
the
granting
of
the
exemption.
There
is
a
application
form
which
must
be
completed
for
these
11
day.
Exemptions.
G
There
has
been
an
increase
in
the
number
of
requests
for
noise
exemptions
related
to
construction
from
major
municipal
construction
projects.
Some
of
these
request
for
exemption
are
well
beyond
the
limits
of
the
delegated
authority.
That
staff
holds
given
the
need
of
these
significant
municipal
construction
projects
to
be
completed
on
time
and
on
budget
and
being
mindful
of
the
ongoing
concerns
of
the
public
about
increased
traffic
congestion.
G
The
number
of
Bilaam
in
motions
to
provide
for
longer
term
exemptions
have
been
brought
forward
to
council
since
2012
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
for
example,
in
the
case
of
road
related
construction,
particularly
in
the
downtown
area
and
on
highway
417.
The
ability
to
work
outside
of
daytime
hours
may
be
necessary
to
alleviate
some
of
that
traffic
congestion
that
is
occurring.
G
It
is
anticipated
that
there
will
be
further
requests
for
noise,
bylaw
exemptions
related
to
construction
activities,
as
the
city
continues
to
experience
the
current
growth
and
the
building
of
our
light
rail
system
as
well.
It
has
more
recently
come
to
light,
but
there
may
be
some
third-party
construction
projects
that
significantly
impact
on
municipal
services
such
as
roadway
and
transit
traffic,
and
it's
recommended
that
these
should
also
be
eligible
for
an
exemption.
G
It
is
proposed
that
the
noise
bylaw
be
amended
to
authorize
the
chief
of
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
to
provide
for
noise
exemptions
for
municipal
projects
and
third-party
construction
projects,
which
have
a
significant
impact
on
municipal
services
under
certain
conditions,
including,
but
not
limited
to,
requiring
that
the
ward
councillor
or
councillors.
If
it
impacts
more
than
one,
be
notified
requiring
some
form
of
public
notification
and
setting
a
90
decibel
threshold.
Where
appropriate.
G
These
exemptions
will
be
subject
to
review
and
termination
jointly
by
the
chief
of
to
services
and
the
deputy
city
manager
of
planning
and
infrastructure
based
on
complaints
received
an
done
compliance
by
the
contractor
with
the
proper
work
with
the
project
requirements,
the
terms
of
the
contract,
the
noise
bylaw
and
any
other
relevant
consideration
pertaining
to
Public
Interest.
An
automatic
review
of
a
granted
exemption
that
take
place
90
days
into
the
project
and
any
proposed
terminations
will
be
preceded
by
notification
to
the
ward
councillor
or
councillors.
G
The
suggested
public
notification
for
the
aforementioned
exemptions
would
be
determined
in
consultation
with
the
affected
ward
councillor
and
could
include,
as
applicable
and
appropriate
posting
notification
on
the
city's
website.
A
public
service
announcement
notice
to
the
community
associations,
hand-delivered
notices
and
an
adjoining
or
abutting
neighborhoods
and
the
use
of
social
media
or
other
communication
methods.
G
G
Staff
at
Boylan
regulatory
services
reviewed
the
recommended
bylaw
amendments
in
conjunction
with
the
real
implementation
office
and
infrastructure
services
and
with
legal
services.
Notification
of
the
expected
consideration
of
the
proposed
bylaw
amendments
for
for
to
be
today
at
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
was
posted
on
the
city's
website.
G
B
You
very
much
chief
and
certainly
I
think
we
all
understand
with
the
unprecedented
amount
of
growth
and
renewal
that
council
has
undertaken
there.
There
certainly
seems
to
be
a
need
or
rationale
behind
having
a
more
kind
of
fluid
process
for
noise
exemptions.
I
have
one
question,
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
my
colleagues
for
questions
and
then
I
know
we
have
one
speaker
on
this
issue.
B
Currently
the
process
is
that
is
that
ward
councillors
are
required
to
sign
off
or
give
approval
and
you're
proposing
that
you
amend
that
process
so
that
the
ward
councillor
be
notified
and
I
know
that
gets
your
intent
that
the
ward
councillor
be
involved
in
the
process.
But
can
you
speak
a
little
bit
to
why
it
is
you're
you're
seeking
to
change
that
and
whether
there's
a
rationale
behind?
That's
simply
not
saying.
While
you
also
require
the
ward
councillor
to
sign
off
as
you
currently
do,.
G
The
the
11-day
exemptions
very
frequently
are
related
to
private
and
his
private
projects.
The
construction
of
large
towers,
condominiums
those
kinds
of
issues
and
have
an
impact
on
a
very
specific
neighborhood,
in
which
case
the
previous
11
day
requires
that
the
award
councillor
sign
off
on
it.
In
this
case,
some
of
the
projects
are
far-reaching,
have
large
city
impact,
so
a
project
that
may
occur
in
in
the
East
End
Ward
may
have
an
impact
somehow
on
the
on
the
flow
of
traffic
into
the
downtown
center.
B
So,
for
clarity's
sake,
though,
if
you
want
to
move
to
this
scenario,
you
know,
are
you
going
to
maintain
two
separate
tracks
of
process,
so,
for
example,
if
they,
if
someone's
have
a
rock
concert
in
my
ward,
if
this
is
approved,
councilors
rally
will
permit.
Does
that
still?
Would
that
still
flow
through
a
process
will
require
my
sign-off
on
it?
Who
would
that
simply
now
fall
into
this
situation,
where
it's
notification,
this.
G
Proposed
amendment
is
only
for
large
municipal
construction
projects,
so
the
other
issues
around
what
concerts
smaller
projects
would
stay
in
the
11
days
and
the
council
would
have
to
give
sign-off.
These
are
intended
for
these
larger
projects.
An
example
is
the
on-ramp
at
174.
It
was
I'm
opposed
to
it.
I
was
aware
of
the
fact
that
it
was
being
paid
last
night.
It
makes
sense.
You
know
the
traffic
going
on.
There
is
horrendous
during
the
daytime
hours,
so
it's
those
larger
larger
projects
related
to
municipal
work.
G
B
C
This
kind
of
changes
analogous
to
the
changes
we
made
with
site
plan
approval
number
of
years
ago,
where
councillors
are
consulted
on
the
site
plan.
Initially,
we
thought
it
would
be
when
the
site
plan
was
submitted,
but
we've
had
cases
where
that's
dwindled
down
to
two
or
three
days
before
the
thing
was
actually
going
to
be
approved.
G
We
are
give
you
my
commitment
here
today
that
you
that
I
would
anticipate
the
councillors
would
be
aware
of
this
request
as
soon
as
we
receive
the
application,
because
it
will
be
done
in
conjunction
with
our
own
city
staff,
it
won't
be
done
simply
by
a
third
party.
If
there's
a
third
party
making
the
request,
we
will
tie
it
back
to
a
city
staff
and
we
were
tied
into
the
counselor's
office
to
make
them
aware
of
it.
C
But
I
remember
three:
four
years
ago
a
major
male
Kia
was
planning
on
an
11
month
period
of
driving
piles
into
the
ground
11
months
of
making
noise
and
I
said,
that's
not
good
enough,
and
although
it
was
impossible
to
do
it
any
other
way
when
the
application
came
in
within
a
week,
they
had
it
down
to
three
months
and
we
agreed
to
that.
So
the
neighborhood
would
not
accept
that
it's
going
to
be
11
months
of
a
toothache
when
it
would
eventually
come
out,
it's
possible
to
do
it
in
shorter
time
and
I.
C
G
If
IKEA
comes
to
us,
we'll
be
saying
who
is
the
city
person
that
you're
working
with
other,
whose
your
project
officer,
we
will
be
dealing
directly
with
the
city
project,
a
person
on
this
okay?
What
are
we
meeting
with
light
rail
and
infrastructure
services?
We
learned
that
sometimes
the
contractors
working
for
the
city
aren't
as
compliant
as
they
should
be,
which
is
why
we
put
in
that
the
requirement
that
we
can.
We
can
cancel
this
at
any
time
if
we
set
guidelines
for
how
this
is
to
be
borne
and
the
contractor
doesn't
abide
by
those.
G
G
C
That's
because
these
ones
already
known
well
that
the
you
know
this
this.
The
issue
of
noise
in
the
neighborhood
is
probably
one
of
the
most
aggravating
issues
to
residents,
because
the
previous
speaker,
who
was
you
pointed
out
that
that
is
probably
the
single
largest
volume
of
calls
that
we
get
about
encroachment
into
the
neighborhood.
So
when
we
dealt
with
this
with
the
zoning
I'm,
sorry
with
site
plan
council
arrived
at
the
solution
that
the
councillor
could
either
concur
or
it
gets
bumped
to
the
next
committee
meeting.
C
What
was
your,
what
your
problem
would
be
with
a
provision
that
does
that,
because
I
think
you
know
if
there
was
a
counselor
who's
being
obstructionist
to
a
citywide
project,
they
wouldn't
have
the
power
to
stop
it.
It
would
just
go
the
next
committee
and
they'd
be
overruled,
that's
the
principle.
We
operate
on
site
plan
and
it's
worked
fairly
well,
except
we
don't
get
notified
on
time
all
the
time,
but
assuming
we're
going
to
be
notified,
it
allows
the
neighborhood
input.
E
Counts
to
perhaps
I
can
have
some
information.
As
per
our
current
policy.
We've
had
situations
where
we
have
been
sought
hasn't
received
the
support
of
the
community
or
the
council,
and
what
we've
advised
individuals
seeking
it
is
then,
if
they
can
get
another
member
of
council
to
bring
an
ocean
forward,
then.
C
We
deal
with
cycling,
we
have
a
mechanism
that
has
worked
fairly
well,
where,
if
the
counselor
doesn't
concur,
does
not
concur
with
the
site
plan,
then
it
rises
to
committee
right
away.
So
committee
makes
a
decision
as
to
whether
the
counselor
was
right
or
staff
or
the
applicant
were
right
and
we
haven't.
Had
anybody
lose
a
lot
of
time
over
that
and
since
we've
tested
the
mechanism,
do
you
think
it
could
work
here.
G
That's
the
will
of
committee,
and
we
were
open
to
as
I
said
before.
These
are
municipal
projects,
I
think
by
having
the
count
award
council
that's
most
affected
as
part
of
the
as
part
of
the
process
of
being
advised
and
and
setting
up
the
notification
to
the
public.
What
will
hope
that
we
are
intend
was
is
to
remove
some
pressure
from
the
council
in
the
particular
area,
as
I
said,
for
a
project
that
is
more
far-reaching
than
just
that
word
that
in
which
it's
occurring.
E
That
I
think
the
process
would
be
cumbersome.
It's
nuisance,
related
issues
and
I'm
wondering
if
the
council
does
not
want
that
activity
taking
place
in
the
ward
different
to
our
site
plan,
which
is
a
land
use
issue
verse,
there's
a
temporary
situation
that
we're
dealing
with
I'm,
not
sure.
If
committee
wants
to
see
these
coming
forward,
my
recommendation
would
be.
C
They
don't
get
so
if
you
think
things
have
been
horrendous
to
this
point,
then
you
would
have
to
do
this.
But
if
you
think
things
have
been
pretty
good
to
this
point,
then
you
don't
have
to
do
this
so
I'm
talking
about
doing
something
that's
halfway
between
because,
like
nobody
wants
who
Bronson
who's
got,
Bronson,
Avenue,
okay
and
nobody
wants
councilor
homes,
stopping
the
sign
going
over
the
Queensway.
C
E
H
There
mr.
churner
yeah,
first
of
all
the
walk
concerts,
you
know
little
apples
and
oranges.
I,
don't
know,
really
relates
the
on-ramps
completely
understand
highways.
That's
not
my
issue
and
I'm
living
it
today
is
your
knees,
water
main
and
clearly
this
new
bylaw
or
a
modification.
The
bylaw
would
apply
to
that
because
it's
a
citywide
project.
It's
essentially
tearing
that
both
night
railroad
between
Moga
V
and
the
highway
to
lay
down
a
water
main
right
beside
condominiums
and
we've
already
granted
exemptions
for
overlay
work
and
my
constituents
are
not
happy.
H
What
does
it
do
by
a
law?
I'd
have
no
power
to
even
stop
it,
and
this
is
a
concern
and
it's
no
disrespect
to
staff
I
think
they
do
a
great
job.
The
problem
is
I.
Think
construction
companies
are
little
more
afraid
of
us
than
they
are
afraid
of
you
and
that's
part
of
my
fears.
If
we
say
go
ahead
staff
you
take
control
the
whole
thing
and,
and
you
can't
pressure
them
or
force
them
to
speed
up
the
process.
H
There's
there's,
there's
no
control
layer
at
all
and
I
live
in
my
community
and
I
know
it's
happening
firsthand.
So
so
that's
just
one
example
that
I
have
a
major
concern
about
the
other
is,
would
it
apply
to
resurfacing
projects
like,
for
example,
although
the
award
we're
gonna
resurface
out
after
the
water
main
is
down,
guess
that's
a
citywide
project,
because
it's
a
main
artery.
Would
this
new
bylaw
so
apply
to
that.
G
G
That's
going
on
on
Monterey
Road,
which
is
one
of
the
routes
I
used
to
take,
but
find
it
too
hard
to
take.
Now.
Yes,
I
understand,
I,
guess
the
issue
is
with
a
certain
amount
of
latitude
to
get
the
work
done
faster.
The
project
will
be
completed
faster.
However,
we
do
have
the
ability
should
the
contractor
not
abide
by
what
we
establish
as
the
parameters
of
that
particular
project.
We
can
pull
back
that
amendment,
so
we're
holding
the
feet
to
the
fire
in
that
each
project
will
be
different.
G
H
I,
do
really
appreciate
that
it's
just
the
problems
that
have
is
I've.
Seen
this
a
couple
of
times
now
well
getting
emergency
email
notification,
I
mean
we
need
any
extension
of
the
overnight
newest
work
overnight.
Construction
work!
Well
that
that's
that's
the
wrong
thing
to
do.
You
know
we
should
be
putting
restrictions
on
on
the
contractors
to
get
the
work
done
in
those
time
frames
once
railroads
a
very
small
segment
of
the
New
Orleans
water
main
the
next
step
after
they're.
H
Finally,
if
they
ever
finish
it
that
one
small
section
they're
going
to
go
right
up
over
the
road,
a
main
artery
again
right
between
two
major
condominium
complexes
and
my
word
I
know:
they're
gonna
come
calling
for
overnight
exemptions
and,
frankly,
I
wouldn't
let
them
after
the
stuff
I've
seen
just
in
the
last
two
months,
just
in
the
small
strip
of
Montreal
Road.
So
you
know
I
look
forward
to
to
councillors
rallies
motion
because
we
do
have
to
have
a
say,
I
guess.
H
H
That's
I
think
that's
the
whole.
The
whole
problem
I
actually
enjoy
doing
my
job
I
enjoy
like
I,
like
being
on
the
hook
to
my
constituency.
If
I
make
the
wrong
decision,
that's
kind
of
how
it
works
I,
remember
two
years
ago,
even
to
try
to
get
$30,000
per
award
for
traffic
calming
measures
and
run
through
transportation
and
evaporated
when
I
got
to
Council
I
wanted
that
power
I
think
we
did
good
jobs.
We
live
in
the
communities
and
you
know
what's
happening
so
in
this
case.
H
I
Thanks
very
much
mr.
chair:
well,
it's
not
the
public
projects
that
worry
me.
You
know
if
an
intersection
needs
closing,
because
we're
doing
work
in
an
intersection
where
there's
Bronson
in
Somerset
or
wherever
I
understand
that
I
know
that
our
staff
working
on
these
projects
are
doing
the
best
they
can
and
the
LRT
is
fine.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
that's
an
absolutely
essential
process,
they're
doing
really
responsible
work
on
the
noise
bylaw.
I
So
if
the
neighbors
need
to
be
notified,
they
are
they're
warned
in
advance,
so
neighbors
are
usually
happier
when
they
know
what's
happening.
They
know
the
duration
of
time,
etc.
It's
the
private
projects
that
I'm
worried
about
so
suddenly
there's
going
to
be
a
large
construction
project
as
it
is
in
my
ward.
This
one
is
at
the
corner
of
Bronson
and
Queen
we're
doing
the
water
main
on
Queen.
It's
just
finished.
That
was
done
well,
you
usually
within
the
noise
power
hours,
but
this
particular
contractor
wants
24
hours
for
about
six
months.
I
Now
guess
what
I'm,
not
agreeing
and
but
he's
very
aggressive,
very
determined
and
my
opinion
of
your
ability
to
stand
up
is
limb-
is
slim
as
compared
to
my
ability
to
stand
up
to
that
kind
of
pressure
and
sort
of
nasty
behavior,
so
I'm
not
happy
that
we're
just
going
to
get
notified,
and
sometimes
these
notifications
come
two
days
in
advance
like
a
festival,
maybe
one
day
in
event.
Suddenly
we
need
this
festival
to
go.
You
know
till
2:00
a.m.
and
their
condos
all
around
the
site.
I
So
you
know
I
want
some
ability
to
be
able
to
talk
turkey
about
about
the
construction
site
and
the
neighbors
who
are
around
that
construction
site
and
most
of
the
contractors
don't
care.
What
do
they
care
that
there
are?
You
know
500
people
are
living
around
and
so
I
want
some
ability
to
talk
to
that.
So
I'll
be
voting
for
the
for
the
requests
that
we
have
here
that
the
the
counselor
has
a
say,
and
if,
if
that
is
not
acceptable,
then
it
rises
to
I
guess
this
committee
chair.
E
E
B
So
vice-chair
Qadri
has
a
suggestion,
I
think
with
relation
to
councillor
Shirley's
motion
and
then
we'll
get
to
councillor
Fleury,
but
just
don't
touch
on
your
last
point.
Miss
Jones
and
counselor
Ellie
had
raised
the
issue
of
Ikea,
so
IKEA
was
a
private
project
on
private
property,
so
the
old
rules,
the
rules
that
counselors
really
used
at
the
time
to
kind
of
force,
the
developer
to
into
a
more
neighborhood
friendly
process.
Those
would
continue
to
apply
correct.
B
B
A
Chair,
if
I
may
what's
being
proposed,
is
yes
that
major
city
projects
be
part
of
this.
This
proposed
amendment,
but
third
party
projects
also
be
included
where
no
matter
where
they're
occurring
they
to
have
a
significant
impact
either
on
city,
roadways,
city
services,
city,
property
or
other
types
of
effects
that
will
have
an
effect
on
on
the
city,
so
that
is
in
the
report.
Yes,
so
we're
looking
at
significant
third-party
projects
as
well
out
of
fairness
to
them,
I
think.
G
So
the
only
have
one
example
to
date,
only
one
and
that's
the
reconstruction
of
the
Rudo
Center
city
staff
have
contacted
us
with
a
concern
about
the
construction
phase,
that's
closest
to
the
Mackenzie
King
Bridge
that
it
will
interfere
submit
with
the
transit
route
if
it's
allowed
to
proceed
during
the
daytime
hours,
so
the
proponent
that
the
private
company
has
it
necessarily
well.
They
have
subsequently
been
in
touch
with
us,
but
it
actually
was
city
staff
that
contact
us.
G
As
I
said,
we
had
a
problem
here,
because
if
they
do
the
work
on
that
particular
side
of
the
building
during
the
daytime,
it's
going
to
interfere
with
the
transit
route,
and
we
can't
have
that
happening
so
they're
they're,
basically,
between
a
rock
and
a
hard
place
on
that
project.
They
can't
do
it
during
the
daytime
and
the
bylaw
doesn't
allow
them
to
do
it
at
night.
That's
one
and
that's
the
only
one
where
we're
up
to
date
and
it's
not
coming
from
the
private
company,
but
rather
from
their
own
city
staff.
B
A
You
very
much
mr.
chair
and
just
going
to
ask
conceptually
as
a
friendly
amendment
to
his
motion
that
what
would
happen
if
we
put
this
under
a
delegated
authority,
as
we
do
with
some
planning
applications,
give
staff
that
delegated
authority
and
if
the
counselor
and
the
staff
member
cannot
agree,
then
it
comes
back
to
committee.
We
have
the
delegated
authority
back
to
committee
or
Council.
A
A
That's
up
to
you,
mr.
chair,
but,
as
you
know,
some
of
these
projects
may
affect
more
than
one
Ward,
so
we
would
propose
that
if
counselors
are
to
receive
an
approval
process
as
part
of
this
that
all
affected
counselors
should
probably
be
looped
in,
but
my
suggestion
is
to
include
the
word
delegated
authority.
Now
it's
clearly
understood
both
by
staff
and.
F
My
comments
are
on
this.
This
element
so
LRT
check
the
work
that
mr.
Mahoney
has
done
with
lands
down
in
terms
of
public
consultation
with
the
neighbors
check.
There's
no
issues
there
and
I
think
you're
getting
from
the
colleagues
here
that
there's
no
issues.
We
want
those
projects
to
be
delivered
on
time
on
budget,
and
you
know
full
steam
ahead.
F
I'm
worried
and
I'm
going
to
use
an
example
where
some
some
contractor
would
bid
on
a
project
knowing
that
they
get
extension,
only
put
one
crew
out,
extend
the
length
of
the
noise
instead
of
saying
hey.
We
can't
do
that
work
with
the
crews
that
are
needed
and
I
don't
know
how
this
process
differentiates
that
so
I
with
big
city
projects
that
we
have
councillor
Byun.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
but
then,
when
we
get
into
the
specific
road
renewal
or
noise
exemptions.
I'm
weary
of
of
these
changes.
F
J
I
think
the
intent
is,
first
of
all
when
we
put
our
contract
together,
we
put
the
restrictions
on
when
and
you
can,
it
cannot
work
and
when
the
completion
date
has
to
be
established
and
before
we
get
to
that
point,
we
would
work
with
the
ward
councillors
to
look
at
some
of
the
impacts
of
delivering
that
project.
Obviously,
you
have
to
take
into
account
working
in
a
residential
area
versus
working
in
the
green
fields
area.
J
Not
really
at
all,
what
did
this
is
really
I
guess
to
make
an
initial
process
when
it's
required
to
do
works
on
a
more
of
a
one-off.
This
isn't
about
working
24/7,
because
it
was
this
change.
This
is
about
when
it's
required
a
special
circumstance,
but
we
need
to
work
through
these
through
the
evening
that
we
can
work
closely
with
with
by
law,
to
make
to
make
that
happen.
F
I'm
comfortable
with
the
emotion
in
some
respects,
because
we
haven't
looked
at
the
other
side
of
the
metal
where
the
work
is
needed,
24/7
for
emergency
purposes
or
for
budget
purposes,
and
the
word
counselor
cannot
politically
say
that
they're
in
favor
of
it,
so
the
benefit
of
bringing
this
back
to
Council
to
get
an
objective
view
into
that
actually
has
budget
impacts
in,
in
my
view,
at
some
level.
So
no
I,
don't
know
where
this
stems
from
I,
don't
know
if
it's
an
LRT
specific
thing
or
if
it's
a
project
specific.
F
What
we
can
say
is
that
we
are
in
favor
of
all
their
work.
That's
it
for
the
RT,
the
middle
Center
will
definitely,
you
know,
require
a
working
group
to
look
at
those
aspects,
but
I
don't
know
that.
There's
that
many
other
properties
for
which
we're
comfortable
at
this
point
to
give
the
delegate
authority
to.
B
H
What
determines
things
are
urgent,
I'd
like
these
are
no
planning,
and
this
like.
We
have
to
have
time
to
be
able
to
inform
our
communities
and
I.
Think
that's
a
big
part
of
it,
too,
is
that's.
Why
we
have
these
checks
and
balances
I
mean
clearly
we
can't
put
our
print
media
in
that
time,
but
we
do
have
relatively
good
Twitter
and
Facebook
accounts
that
we
can
put
out
some
kind
of
translated
message
to
our
community
by
email
at
least
some
kind
of
warning
and
what
determines,
if
it's
urgent.
G
G
Emergencies
at
the
last
minute,
I
think
what
we
were
attempting
to
do
with
this.
What
we're
bringing
forward
today
is
to
try
to
put
more
structure
around
the
city,
construction
projects
and
I
think
the
one
you're
referring
to
is
a
city
construction
project.
So
at
the
outset
we
could
have
done
an
analysis
of
that
entire
project
determined
what
was
going
to
be
required
and
had
a
good
idea
of
when
there
may
need
to
be
some
maritime
work
and
no
distributable
to
advise
the
community.
I
agree
with
you.
G
H
And
that's
a
big
part
of
the
concern,
especially
when
it's
a
Friday
notification.
Looking
for
Monday
Tuesday
I
represent
a
bilingual
award.
We
must
get
everything
translated
to
get
it
out
to
my
constituency
and
it
doesn't
give
me
that
ability
it's
very
difficult
so
again,
I,
look
forward
to
to
council
rallies
motion
because
I
think
they'll
address
some
of
that.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
So
I
just
saw
what
comes
a
solid
proposal
right
here,
that
recommendation
amended
to
require
consent
of
the
council
most
affected
and
that
when
the
council
will
hold
consent,
the
mayor
right
through
the
committee
for
decision.
If
you
recall
this
summer
for
six
weeks,
this
committee
didn't
have
a
meetin
mister
chair,
and
that
would
concern
me
of
something
right
from
from
this
motion.
So
that
mean
the
job
from
this
committee
have
a
meeting
and
document
so
I
caution
you
before
we
jump.
D
You
know
you
want
to
be
informed
of
you,
wanna
sign
off
on
a
consent,
but
this
motion
does
really.
It
will
be
like
what
a
better
project
during
that
time
when
you
need
to
be
able
to
do
it,
because
in
the
summer
time
just
committed
for
six
weeks
and
seconds,
we
didn't
have
a
meeting.
So
what
would
you
do
at
that
time
at
this?
So
I
will
not
be
supporting
this
and
I
would
caution
my
card.
That's
going
to
delay
quite
a
better
project
for
the
city.
D
B
A
Implement
the
process
that's
being
suggested
by
the
motion,
we
may
need
to
have
more
time
just
looking
at
the
scheduling
of
meetings
and
I
assume
that
in
the
proposed
amendment
it
wouldn't
the
matter
just
wouldn't
rise
to
committee.
It
would
also
rise
to
council.
If
that's
the
case,
then
we
have
to
add
on
an
extra
week
right
now
in
the
proposed
amendment,
we
are
asking
applicants
to
come
forward
30
days
in
advance.
I
suspect
the
30
days
may
not
always
be
sufficient.
A
If
we
are
looking
at
a
procedure
to
rise
to
committee
and
counts
in
in
the
case
of
objections,
we
may
need
to
bring
it
to
60
days.
60
days
is
what's
currently
in
place
for
the
11
day.
Exemptions
so
60
days
so
requiring
the
applicant
to
come
forward
60
days
in
advance,
would
allow
ample
time
to
to
have
the
application
received
vetted
by
staff
contact.
The
affected
counsellors
see
if
there's
disagreement
and
then
work
something
up
for
the
next
committee
and
then
council
meeting
I
think
that
you're
right
mr.
A
C
Well,
that's
ridiculous!
No!
Look
what
you
have
now
right
now!
You
don't
even
have
that
process
right
now.
If
the
counselor
says
no,
it's
dead
and
you've
never
had
a
single
project
stopped
or
delayed.
Because
of
that.
So
to
suggest
that
this
is
somehow
adding
all
kinds
of
more
restrictions.
It's
not
it's
removing
them!
I'm.
A
C
A
C
We've
done
significant
construction
projects
before
this
year
we
have
and
I've
never
seen
any
member
of
Council,
not
even
Alex
Collins,
stop
or
delay
a
project
over
a
noise
exemption,
so
we're
dealing
with
fantasy
here.
The
real
issue
is
our
council
members
and
their
communities
going
to
be
able
to
have
input
into
whether
the
noise
exemptions
granted
and
into
modifications
that
make
it
more
acceptable.
C
B
So
that
is
before
us
as
well
as
the
report
itself
and
now
we'll
have
the
we
have
one
registered
delegation,
mr.
Kevin
O'donnell
and
mr.
O'donnell
I
know
you've
appeared
before
before
committee.
So
maybe
you
know
the
drill.
You
have
five
minutes
from
when
you
begin
and
please
remember,
to
use
the
microphone
and.
K
Push
the
button,
which
is
what
I
usually
forget,
Thank
You
Council
for
committee,
for
your
taking
this
time.
I
just
have
three
words:
it's
the
or
other
property
definition
in
the
document.
That
is
the
actual
draft
bylaw
text
as
I
understand
it.
Reading
through
the
report,
the
report
takes
pains
to
always
attach
third
party
projects
that
have
significant
impact
to
municipal
sponsored
projects.
So
these
are
third
party
construction
at
the
behest
of
the
city
in
some
way.
K
Unfortunately,
the
bylaw
text
as
I
as
I,
understand
it,
does
not
make
that
clear
that
precise
of
a
connection
I've
heard
from
from
staff
make
those
same
connections
here
to
you
today.
I
think
making
those
connections
is
finding.
If
we
have
big
works
in
the
city,
those
should
proceed.
We
want
to
save
money
by
making
a
lot
of
noise.
That's
fine!
My
concern
is
perhaps
the
IKEA
example
where
a
third
party
construction
on
private
property
could
have
a
significant
impact,
which
I'm
also
not
sure
exactly
what
that
means.
K
But
that's
why
I'm
leave
that
aside
significant
impact
to
City
something
City,
something
acceptor
or
other?
What
is
that
other
property?
Is
that
other
private
property,
who
is
a
neighbor
I,
know
it's
obviously
the
intent
of
staff
to
do
to
proceed
with
a
system?
That's
gonna
work
and
make
the
system
easier?
My
concern
is
just
you
know
when
there's
a
little
bit
of
sunlight
shining
through
a
crack.
That's
how
later
on
five
ten
years
down
the
line,
we
have
perhaps
changeover
and
staff,
which
is
natural,
maybe
they
weren't
here.
K
For
this
conversation,
we
have
new
counsel,
who
maybe
don't
see
the
problem
that
was
raised
and
we
have
noise
exemptions
that
are
being
allowed
for
private
property.
That
is
impacting
other
private
property
that
actually
has
no
impact
to
city
highways
or
city
services
or
in
etc.
It
would
be
unfortunate
to
have
those
exemptions
allowed
under
delegated
authority,
with
no
accountability
to
committee
and
council,
so
I'd
suggest
perhaps
just
striking
those
three
words
from
the
draft
by
law
and
that
would
be
addressed
at
councillors
rally.
K
Your
draft
motion
in
all
likelihood
addresses
my
concern
in
that
the
city,
the
councillor,
who
would
be
looking
at
that
situation
go
no
way:
I'm,
not
gonna,
sign
off
on
that,
and
that
will
bubble
up.
So
perhaps
if
your
motion
precedes
mine,
my
concern
is
mooted,
but
I
think
it.
You
know
we
don't
we
don't
one
slap
sloppy,
so
you
can
stop.
Is
that
I
sure
would
me
but
unfortunate
bylaw
text
to
sneak
in
and
then
have
unintended
side,
quinces
side
effects
down
wine.
B
B
Miss
Jones
on
councillors.
Rally's
motion
he's
he's
requiring
it
come
back
to
committee
for
a
decision.
Councilor.
Is
there
any
reason
why
we
couldn't
have
it
come
straight
to
Council
and
councillors
rally?
Would
you
be
fine
with
that
I'm?
Fine
with
that,
if
staff
are
concerned
about
the
60
day
window,
then
we
eliminate
the
committee
step.
It
gets
you
right
into
Council.
Does
that
work?
It's
fine!
B
F
Motion
on
the
motion
I'd
like
to
maybe
add
a
friendly
amendment
related
to
private
property,
but
I
think
the
discussion
has
been
around
city
municipal
projects
and
it's
confusing
to
bring
the
Rito
centerpiece
in
there.
I
mean,
like
the
discussion
has
been
that
we
could.
We
will
bring
a
specific
report
for
for
Reno
Center.
So
if
that
property
specific
it
shouldn't,
be
part
of
this
debate
and
in
my
mind
so
I
think
we
should
pull
the
private
property
aspects
of
this
report.
Would
you
see
that,
as
a
friendly
amendment
I.
B
Think
the
staff
would
the
the
purpose
of
chaining
and
again
I
think
the
challenge
for
staff
fears
were
caught
in
this.
You
know.
What
do
you
mean
when
you
say
private
property?
That
has
a
significant
impact
and
that's
the
challenge
you
created
the
you
know.
You
gave
us
the
example
of
the
Rio
Center.
That's
the
only
example
you
can
give
us
so
we're
struggling
a
little
bit
I.
Think
to
to
imagine
what
other
private
private
property
projects
would
have.
B
A
significant
City
impact
I
mean
you're,
telling
us
that
IKEA
doesn't
so
that's
a
that's
a
massive
site,
so
you're
telling
us
that
would
be
under
the
old
rules
where
the
councilor
already
can
veto
that
process.
So,
if
you're,
asking
for,
if
you're
asking
for
a
little
more
latitude
on
city,
operated
projects
make
councillor
flurries
having
that
same
challenge
with,
can
you
get?
Can
you
come
up
with
one
other
example?
E
E
B
J
B
Years,
one
day
that's
carried
and
then
on
the
main
report,
as
amended
seek
aid
carried.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
with
that
I
know
we
have
some
members
who
have
to
get
out
to
a
health
event.
We
only
have
one
other
item.
That's
notices
of
motion
for
consideration
at
subsequent
meeting,
counselor
Lori
I
know
you
have
one
read
it
at
speed.
Yes,.
F
F
You
directed
to
reveal
the
pawnbrokers
act
and
advise
whether
we
can
recommend
that
the
province
be
approached
to
make
amendments
to
it
in
order
to
more
easily
and
efficiently
put
in
place
a
municipal
SS,
a
scheme
for
pawnbrokers
and
that
for
and
furthermore,
that
staff
consult
with
the
Ottawa
Police
Service
says
to
review
best
practices
and
that
in
your
spa,
use
in
responding
to
these
questions.
These
are
again
for
stolen
goods
in
pawnshops
and
possibilities
of
investigating.
Thank.