►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - September 8, 2021
Description
Ottawa City Council - September 8, 2021
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
D
D
E
A
G
H
D
D
A
C
A
A
At
the
city
council
meeting
of
wednesday
september
9
2020
council
passed
a
motion
moved
by
councilor
moffat
and
seconded
by
councillor
harter,
directing
that
I
write
a
letter
requesting
that
the
federal
provincial
governments
formally
recognize
the
month
of
september
as
childhood
cancer
awareness
month.
Cancer
is
the
leading
cause
of
disease-related
deaths
for
canadian
children
with
1700
children
diagnosed
annually,
and
some
childhood
cancers
are
terminal
upon
diagnosis
as
a
result
of
advances
in
research.
Over
80
percent
of
children
survive
cancer.
However,
more
than
80
percent
of
survivors
face
late
effects
from
the
disease
and
harsh
treatment.
A
Children
with
cancer
and
their
families
need
the
best
research,
medical,
financial
and
emotional
support
as
they
navigate
the
path
towards
healing.
We
support
the
courageous
children
affected
by
cancer
and
commend
the
hard
work
and
dedication
of
scientists,
health
care
professionals,
researchers,
volunteers
and
all
those
who
are
working
to
overcome
childhood
cancer
and
assist
families
with
children
affected.
I'm
very
pleased
to
announce
that
in
february
of
this
year,
health
canada
confirmed
that
the
month
of
september
is
now
formally
recognized
as
health
care,
as
can
childhood
cancer
awareness
month
and
is
included
on
health.
A
On
september
1st,
just
last
week,
I
had
the
pleasure
proclaiming
september's
childhood
cancer
awareness
month
and
presented
the
proclamation
to
candlelighters
a
local,
not-for-profit
organization
that
provide
programs
and
services
to
young
cancer
patients
and
their
families
receiving
treatment
in
the
national
capital
region.
I'm
also
pleased
to
inform
you
that
the
childhood
cancer
awareness
flag
is
currently
flying
at
ottawa
city
hall
and
will
be
flown
the
entire
month
of
september.
J
K
D
I
A
F
Thank
you,
mayor
and
good
morning.
Colleagues,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
and
put
on
the
record
that
I
did
request
an
unpaid
leave
of
absence
at
the
beginning
of
the
federal
election
and
I
have
consulted
with
the
city
clerk
as
well
as
the
integrity
commissioner
at
the
outset,
to
ensure
that
I
am
abiding
by
all
city
policies
throughout
the
election,
but
I
am
committed
to
my
residence
and
that's
why
I'm
here
today
and
why
I
continue
to
work
on
behalf
of
my
residents
as
they
would
expect
me
to
do
so.
A
K
F
Agriculture
and
rural,
fair
committee
report
number
24,
build
heritage
subcommittee
report,
number
23
planning
committee
report,
47
transportation
committee
report
21
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
july
21
2021
be
received
and
considered
that
rules
of
procedure
be
suspended
to
receiving
considerative
finance
incoming
development
committee
report
number
28
due
to
the
time
sensitivity
of
the
eye
time
items
contained
in
this
report.
C
Specifically
the
emission
of
the
lands
to
be
rezoned
from
r5ch36
to
am1
x,
x,
x,
x,
s
y
y
y
h.
Therefore,
beer
resolved
the
document
two
details
of
recommended
zoning
be
amended
by
replacing
point
one
with
the
following
texts:
re-zone
the
land
shown
in
document,
one
from
am1,
h9
and
r5ch36
to
am1
x,
x,
x,
x,
s
y
y
y
h,
and
be
it
further
resolve
that,
pursuant
to
the
plane,
subsection.
A
A
K
L
A
K
I
did
I
have
a
question
for,
for
I
guess
our
director
of
housing,
just
a
clarification
from
committee.
It's
great
to
see
council,
take
a
leap
into
investing
in
affordable
housing
with
the
15
million
dollars.
I'd
love
for
us
to
do
more,
but
I
want
to
understand
if,
if
council
hadn't
identified
a
capital
program
of
15
million
dollars,
how
would
we
have
perceived
or
receive
the
the
federal
program,
specifically
the
rhi,
because
there
seems
to
be
local
local
back
filling
of
a
federal
program
to
to
make
it
achievable
locally?
M
M
K
Okay,
thank
you
for
clarifying
that,
just
as
a
final
final
point
to
the
rhi
funding,
could
you
maybe
speak
to
when
you
talked
about
new,
newer
flexibility
that
is
offered
that
in
terms
of
the
modular
homes
and
and
the
increase
in
cost
and
timing
of
that,
can
you
maybe
just
enlighten
us?
I
know
a
committee.
We
didn't
have
a
chance
to
get
into
that.
M
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
mean
within
phase
one
of
the
rhi.
One
of
the
big
limitations
was
that
the
federal
government
had
required
that
the
city
and
its
partners
utilize
modular
housing
as
the
primary
construction
type
to
build
the
new
supportive
housing
in
phase
two.
That's
been
removed
that
specific
criteria,
but
we
still
have
you
know
very
tight
timelines
to
deliver
the
units
about
a
year
a
year
and
a
half
right
now.
K
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
saeed,
and
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
for
that
I
will
support
the
report
I
do
want
to
raise.
You
know
the
situation
where
we
are
backfilling
a
program.
It's
a
worthwhile
program.
It
is
targeting
below
market,
rent
and
and
the
affordability
needs
we
do,
but
it's
important
for
us
at
council
now
that
we
have
a
a
renewed
plan.
We
know
where
our
investments
need
to
go.
We
need
to
formalize
those
requests
to
the
feds
and
and
the
province
when
pro
programs
become
available.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Mel
c
corsier
on
the
report
carried
and
update.
Great
next
is
official
plan.
Amendment
two,
eight
four,
eight
two,
eight
five
one,
two
eight
eight
one,
two,
eight
nine
eight
baycrest
drive
and
28202831
cedarwood
drive
and
2816
sandalwood
drive.
We
have
a
number
of
motions
as
well
for
discussions,
so
we'll
get
all
the
motions
on
the
table
first
and
then
we'll
go
into
questions
and
debate.
So
the
first
motion
is
by
counselor
kits
second
by
counselor
klutzier
counselor
kits.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
your
motion,
please.
F
A
Okay,
we'll
ask
councillor
clutier
to
read
on
behalf
of
counselor
kits
and
we'll
help
counselor
kids
get
back
online.
I
think
it's
that
rural
internet
issue
that
we
sometimes
have
challenges
with
in
our
city.
So
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
want
to
get
that
fixed,
so
counselor
clutchier.
Do
you
want
to
introduce,
on
behalf
of
councillor
kitts.
E
Mercy,
mr
martin,
thank
you
councillor,
kitts,
for
your
thoughtful
questions
at
planning
committee,
and
this
motion
comes
from
those
those
questions
and
the
clarifications
that
need
to
be
that
need
to
be
done.
The
whereases
are
there
and-
and
I
invite
my
council
colleagues
to
to
read
them.
The
substance
of
the
motion
is
therefore
be
resolved.
E
It
speaks
to
when,
when
units
become
affordable
and
continuing
until
this
tenancy
is
terminated,
prevailing,
rent
controls
will
govern
annual
rent
increases,
but
no
new
construction
exemption
from
rent
controls
will
apply
and
for
great
greater
clarity.
Annual
rent
increases
guidelines
limit
will
apply
to
rent
increases,
regardless
of
the
age
of
the
property
and
just
take
30
seconds.
Mr
mayor,
it
is
because,
after
units
that
are
built,
sorry.
A
Counselor,
so
we're
we're
going
to
come
back
to
each
motion
and
speak
to
it.
I
just
want
to
get
them
all
tabled
so
make
the
public
know
that
they're
they're
out
there.
So
that's
the
first
one.
It's
moved
by
counselor
kits
who
we
know
is
there,
but
having
some
technical
challenges
and
seconded
by
councilor
clutsier.
The
next
motion
we
received
is
by
councillor
menard
seconded
by
councillor
mckinney,
so
councilman
arden.
You
can
just
introduce
the
motion
and
we'll
come
back
to
debate.
It
afterwards.
Sure.
I
Therefore,
be
it
resolve
that
the
council
directs
staff
to
further
engage
with
the
applicant
hair
and
gate
tenant
leadership,
including
acorn,
and
the
ward
councillor,
to
continue
discussions
with
respect
to
securing
housing
replacement
for
existing
tenants
in
a
similar
unit
and
typology
as
to
what
the
tenants
have
currently
and
that
these
discussions
cause
no
delay
from
advancing
the
current
memorandum
of
understanding
and
related
current
planning
approvals,
but
that
any
agreed
upon
changes
be
brought
forward.
At
the
time
of
future
rezonings
and
site
plan.
I
Whereas
there
is
a
concern
that
the
proposed
rent
levels
will
not
meet
the
affordability
requirements
for
current
and
former
households
living
in
the
area,
whereas
further
exploration
of
alternative
approaches
is
warranted
to
better
determine
appropriate
rent
levels
for
ensuring
affordability
needs
are
met,
therefore,
be
resolved.
That
council
directs
city
staff
to
review
the
methodology
for
affordable
rent
calculation
at
the
neighborhood
or
ward
level.
I
This
is
the
third
and
final
motion
and
it
speaks
to
the
main
issues
that
we
had
been
hearing
at
planning
committee
prior
to
I'll.
Just
read
the
therefore
be
a
resolve
that
council
directs
staff
to
further
engage
with
local
residents,
community
groups,
hearing
aid
tenant
representatives,
the
applicant
of
the
ward
counselor,
with
respect
to
increasing
the
percentage
of
affordable
housing
made
available
within
the
development
through
any
upcoming
zoning
and
site
plan
agreement
processes.
I
A
D
D
Are
we
still
talking
about
that?
One?
Okay?
This
is
I'm
just
going
to
wait
for
the
motion
to
come
up.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
this
motion
is
about
documenting
the
process
that
staff
went
through
with
respect
to
the
memorandum
of
understanding
and
best
practices.
I'll
simply
read
the
therefore
clause
that
council
directs
staff
to
review
the
heron
gate,
development,
memorandum
of
understanding
and
report
back
to
council
no
later
than
q2
2022
with
respect
to
best
practices.
Lessons
learned
and
the
challenge
is
negotiating
the
respective
mou.
D
A
D
So
this
is
just
a
formal
request
that
hazelview
engaged
with
previous
tenants
who
have
accepted
move-out
compensation
packages
to
inform
them
of
the
number
of
affordable
housing
units
within
the
development
and
that,
if
they
qualify,
they
are
welcome
to
apply
for
an
affordable
housing
unit
within
their
respective
development.
Thank
you
mayor.
A
A
F
A
Okay,
so
apologize
to
counselor
kits
for
this
issue,
we'll
try
to
get
it
fixed
as
quickly
as
possible
and
maybe,
if
not
maybe
phoning,
it
might
be
an
option.
Deputy
clerk.
The
next
motion
on
this
item
is
by
councillor
kavanaugh
seconded
by
councillor
includes
councillor
cavanaugh.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
the
motion,
please.
N
A
E
E
The
meeting
is
on
september
14th,
we'll
talk
about
the
next
steps.
We'll
talk
about
the
implementation
of
the
mou.
If
it's
approved
today
by
council,
we'll
talk
about
ongoing
property
standards,
community
engagement
opportunities
park
improvements
and
much
more,
as
as
many
of
you
have
said,
the
agreement
is
a
significant
milestone
in
a
city
which
declared
a
housing
and
homelessness
emergency
less
than
two
years
ago.
It
is
20
of
newly
built
units
that,
and
that
is
over,
a
thousand
units
of
affordable
housing.
E
It
establishes
a
strong
social
enterprise
framework
and
made
stronger
and
more
present
with
the
motion
by
councillor
kavanaugh,
and
I
appreciate
that
she
is
allowing
me
to
second
that
motion
I'd
also
like
us
around
this
table
to
continue
building
on
the
framework
to
find
a
realistic
and
an
acceptable
definition
of
affordable
housing
by
us.
For
our
tenants,
and
I
appreciate
the
work
and
the
leadership
of
councillor
mckenny
and
any
initiatives
she
could
bring
forward
to
improve
those
definitions.
E
We
want
to
continue
to
work
with
communities
and
developers
to
reassure
neighborhoods
that
their
city
has
a
framework
in
place
that
protects
them
and
it
sets
expectations
not
only
for
residents
but
for
us
counselors
for
developers,
so
that
we're
not
always
rewriting
the
book.
Every
time
an
established
community
is
facing
major
changes
through
development
and
thank
you
councillor,
brockington,
for
your
motion
and
for
allowing
me
to
second
it.
E
And
finally,
I
want
to
thank
the
essential
voices
in
the
conversations
that
we've
been
having
for
the
past
four
years,
the
heron
gates
steering
committee
with
its
many
partners:
community
health,
organizing
and
outreach
partners,
city
staff,
legal
housing
planning.
You
have
all
worked
tirelessly
tirelessly
on
this,
and
I
thank
you
for
your
professionalism
and
your
diligence,
my
council,
colleagues,
for
your
thoughtful
dialogue
and
your
contributions,
and
especially
the
community
of
herron
gate
for
their
patience,
their
persistence
and
their
resilience
I'll
be
voting
yes
to
this
opa,
knowing
full
well
that
the
work
does
not
end.
E
A
A
L
L
After
the
15-year
agreement
expires,
we
had
received
a
verbal
commitment
from
hazel
view
that
they
wouldn't
simply
let
the
affordable
units
skyrocket
and
price,
but
given
the
history
on
this
file
and
given
the
community's
understandable
trepidation
with
taking
the
applicant
on
its
word,
a
verbal
commitment
wasn't
enough,
and
I
did
want
to
see
that
in
writing,
especially
because,
as
we
learned
units
built
after
november,
2018
aren't
subject
to
limited
rent
increases
under
the
residential
tenancies
act.
So
I
am
moving
this
motion
because
my
support
was
contingent
on
it.
L
But
really
this
is
the
result
of
the
hard
work
of
councilor
klutzier.
He
had.
We
had
some
some
good
chats
over
the
last
week,
but
he
was
able
to
push
the
applicant
to
clarify
the
mou
to
include
provisions
that
the
affordable
housing
units
would
be
subject
to
rent
control
after
the
15
years.
So
I
am
seeking
your
support
on
this,
and
it
is
my
hope
that
this
will
provide
at
least
a
little
peace
of
mind
to
the
residents.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
A
O
Section
4-3
why
we
would
make
it
contingent
on
the
tenant
at
this
time.
I
guess
I
wonder
why
we
wouldn't
try
to
keep
those
units
affordable
in
our
city.
That's
510
units
in
perpetuity.
So
if
here's,
my
concern
is
that
if
you
have
a
family
in
there
now
and
their
kids,
you
know
age
out
of
the
home
and
and
the
parents
or
the
parent.
O
A
M
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
If,
council,
on
the
one
hand,
you
are
correct,
after
15
years,
if
a
tenant
vacates
the
unit,
the
rent
can
be,
can
be
reset,
but
for
all
the
tenants
today,
if
anybody
vacates
any
unit
and
if
the
landlord
wishes
to
they
could
increase
the
rent
to
whatever
they
they
want.
O
No,
I
I
I
understand
that,
and
I
I
appreciate
that
that
was
actually
brought
to
our
attention
by
some
of
the
tenants
in
hazel
bean.
Actually
they
were
sending
messages
and
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
when
I
did,
but
what
4-3
says
is
that
if
you,
if,
if
it's
not
this
tenant,
we
will
lose
that
affordable
unit?
O
M
So
counselor,
if,
if
one
family
moves
in
at
14
years,
it
would
stay
affordable,
you
know
well
into
the
future
okay,
but
if
they
move
out
after
the
15
years,
the
landlord
would
have
the
right
to
to
set
the
rent.
However,
typically,
when
we
negotiate
any
affordable
housing
agreement,
there
is
a
time
limit,
that's
associated
with
that,
affordable
housing,
so
that
the
city
and
the
developer
can
can
look
at
what
value
that
rent
reduction
is
when
we're
providing
those
those
units.
O
Yeah,
no,
I
I
I
understand
that,
and
I
understand
that
that
often
happens.
I
don't
agree
with
it,
but
I
do
understand
that
it
happens
anytime.
You
set
a
term
limit
15
years
in
the
life
of
a
family.
Is
it's
not
very
long,
15
years,
actually
in
the
life
of
a
tenancy
or
a
unit
that
needs
to
stay
affordable
for
today,
10
years,
20
years,
30
years?
It's
not
very
long.
If
you
look
at
you
know,
ottawa
community
housing
ccoc
some
of
these
buildings,
think
of
beaver
barracks.
O
I
think
they're
at
15
years,
like
it
seems
like
yesterday,
we
built
it,
but
but
but
it
comes
it
comes
it
approaches
quickly.
So
I
just
wonder
if
the
movers
of
the
motion
would
accept
an
amendment
to
take
out
that
that
one
clause
that
allows
new
tenancy
after
15
years,
let's
make
hazel
dean.
Let's,
let's
ensure
that
hazel
dean
keeps
these
units,
it's
not
very
many,
and
it's
not
it's
not
it's
not
going
to
be
a
loss
to
them.
O
E
O
H
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
had
a
question,
but
now
I
have
another
one
based
on
that
exchange.
It
just
occurred,
and
I
guess
it's
it's
to
counselor
clutches
this
question,
mr
maris,
as
the
senate
work
for
counselor
kits
either
one
in
the
example
that
you
just
gave
you
made
reference
to
a
tenant
moving
in
in
year
11,
and
so
I
I
just
want
clarity
here.
E
E
15
2018
guideline
increases
as
if
it
was
built,
pre
november
15,
2018
and
as
we
all
know,
there
is
no
rent
controls
on
new
units
as
as
dictated
by
the
the
residential
tenancies
act
for
units
that
were
built
after
november
15
2018..
So
the
answer
to
your
question
counselor
egg
lie
is:
it
remains
affordable
for
the
amount
of
time
that
the
tenant
remains
in
that
unit,
and
that
is
why.
E
Correct
and
as
a
further
clarification
if
a
tenant
moves
in
at
year,
one
moves
out
at
year,
seven
another
tenant
moves
in
at
year,
seven
stays
till
year,
twelve
and
another
tenant
moves
in
at
year.
Twelve
and
continues
on
it
is
the.
It
is
the
unit
that
remains
affordable
for
minimum
15
years
and
in
the
scenario
that
we've
described
post
15
years.
H
Yep-
and
you
know
when
I
clear-
and
I
appreciate
that
clarification
and-
and
the
question
I
was
going
to
ask-
is-
is
sort
of
related
to
that,
and
I
think
you
have
answered
it.
I
had
concerns
about
the
people
that
have
already
been
removed
from
their
homes
that
have
been
evicted.
That
council
brockington's
motion,
I
believe,
speaks
to
in
part.
H
F
M
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
At
the
end
of
the
15
years,
counselor
the
those
tenants
will
be
subject
to
rent
increases
that
are
allowed
under
the
guideline,
for
you
know
older
units
or
post
november
2018
units
as
the
rta
states
today.
So
that
would
be
a
maybe
like
a
1.8
percent
increase.
You
know
two
percent.
It's
usually
you
know
it's
pegged
to
the
consumer
price
index
each
year
and
so
they'll
be
subject
to
the
same
increase
that
they're
subject
to
today
in
the
units
that
they
are
already
reciting.
J
Mr
mayor,
if
I
could
respond
to
that,
the
the
mou
really
speaks
to
the
negotiated
arrangement
with
hazel
view
and
just
to
to
let
members
of
council
know.
This
is
the
largest
agreement
that
we've
ever
secured
for
affordable
housing
with
a
private
developer
and
it
would
be
unaffordable
for
them
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
perpetuity
it
was
raised.
I
had
that
discussion
with
them
and
they
have
informed
me
that
that
would
not
be
an
acceptable
change.
F
J
E
P
P
M
P
So
for
further
further
reducing
the
rent,
that's
correct!
Yes,
okay,
I'm!
You
know
I'm
pleased
to
see
you
know
a
private
sector
developer,
helping
us
out
with
our
with
our
housing
issues.
It
was.
It
was
good
to
hear
from
staff
that
this
is
the
the
largest
agreement
this
this
developer
didn't
have
to
do
this,
and-
and
I
just
want
to
express
my
appreciation
for
for
them,
helping
us
out
with
with
this
issue.
P
I
I
My
understanding
is
these
units
that,
if
any
tenant
currently
existing
in
herongate
chooses
to
move
into
one
of
these
units,
those
units
are
considered
the
affordable
housing
units.
For
this.
It's
not
on
top
of
the
affordable
housing
units.
These
these
are
being
considered
as
part
of
the
package
of
affordable
housing
units
and
so
just
to
to
saeed.
I
guess
if
because
because
just
if
you
could
just
confirm
these
are
part
of
that
package
of
units,
that
they're
saying
would
be
afforded
the
16
of
units
that
would
be
affordable
in
this.
In
this
development.
I
M
It
would
but
but
a
section
of
the
rta
that
pertains
to
older
units
so
that
rent
control
would
remain.
I
think
the
concern
was,
if
tenants
moved
into
newly
constructed
units
that,
after
the
15
years,
there
will
be
absolutely
no
rent
control
for
those
tenants.
So
then
the
landlord
could
increase
the
rent
from
you
know
whether
it
was
fifteen
hundred
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
and
there'll
be
nothing.
We
can
do
that.
I
Right,
but
that
is
the
concern,
because
the
rta,
my
understanding,
is,
allows
above
guideline
rent
increases
and
they
could
still
be
subject
to
above
guideline
rent
increases,
saying
because
the
same
argument
that
miss
netan
has
used
here
that
they
can't
afford
it.
They
could
still
apply
for
an
above
guideline.
Rent
increase.
J
I
So
they
just
want
to
clarify
on
that
one,
the
rent,
wouldn't
if
somebody
was
paying
1500
for
a
three
bedroom
right
now,
as
we
saw
with
10
people
living
in
here
now
and
they
moved
into
that
unit,
and
then
they
moved
out
a
few
years
later.
That
unit
wouldn't
stay
at
the
1500
rent
it
would
increase.
My
understanding
is
to
what
is
deemed
affordable
for
the
whole
city,
which
would
be,
I
think
we
were
estimating
more
than
2
000.
M
I
can
I
can
answer
that
question
so
so,
for
example,
if
somebody
was
paying
right
now
we're
looking
at
some
of
the
average
market
rents
for
tenants,
the
rents
that
tenants
actually
pay
in
the
building,
so
you
know
around
15
24
is
what
you
know.
A
lot
of
people
in
town
homes
will
be
paying
right
now.
If
somebody
moves
into
a
new
unit,
the
rent
would
still
be
15
24..
M
M
So
that's
just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
the
difference
is,
so
it's
still
considerably
less
than
what
could
be
charged
in
the
market,
and
I
do
recognize
that
1850
is
is
higher.
However,
we
do
have
to
take
into
account
other.
You
know
other
factors
you
know
as
well,
and
we
think
that
you
know
with
housing
benefits
and
other
supports.
Families
would
still
be
able
to
afford
those
rents
moving
in.
I
Yes,
so
that
is
what
is
considered
affordable
writ
large
across
the
city
as
a
median,
but
not
for
this
neighborhood,
which
is
again
one
of
the
issues
that
is
is
trying
to
be
addressed
in
some
of
these
motions.
I
didn't
get
an
answer
to
the
question:
if
the
rta
after
15
years
applies,
then
I
assume
above
guideline,
rent
increases
could
also
be
applied
for
by
this
developer.
At
that
time,.
J
D
J
To
to
clarify,
maybe
mr
mark
could
clarify
from
the
memorandum,
but
the
rents
will
not
see
significant
increases.
They
will
have
annual
guidelines
to
follow
with
respect
to
what's
allowable
for
rent
increases
each
year
and
once
the
15
years
is
up
or
the
20
years
is
up,
there's
not
going
to
be
a
huge
spike
in
what
the
rent
will
be.
It'll
continue
to
be
following
those
guidelines
under
the
tenancy
act
for
allowable
increases
on
an
annual
basis.
I
Yes,
it'd
be
good
to
hear
from
mr
mark
because
the
the
what
I'm
saying
is
that
they
can
apply
for
an
above
guideline,
rent
increase
after
that
time,
like
anybody
can
under
the
rta
so
so,
mr
mark,
I
know
I
I
hope
you
know
the
the
rules
about
it.
I'm
pretty
sure
you
do,
but
can
you
clarify
that
after
that
time
does
this
motion
lock
them
in
or
can
they
apply
for
an
above
guideline,
rent
increase
under
the
which
is
is
available
now
under
the
rta.
B
I
I
I
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
The
the
number
of
motions
on
the
floor
now
are
very
important.
This
is
probably
the
most
important
one
for
me
further
to
counselor
meehan's
question.
I
have
been
asking
ms
neden
councilor
claudia
for
a
couple
weeks
now
about
preserving
the
affordable
housing
units
in
perpetuity
not
having
a
time
limit
on
those
affordable
housing
units.
Many
of
us
were
asked
in
the
2018
election.
Would
you
support
preserving
defending
affordable
housing
units?
So
when
things
like
this
happen,
we
don't
decrease.
D
D
They
will
only
be
permitted
to
increase
their
rent
by
the
basically
the
rate
of
inflation
that
we
heard
hazelview
at
committee,
say
I'm
not
going
to
take
an
affordable
housing,
rent
and
jack
it
up
to
the
average
market
rent
in
ottawa.
We're
not
going
to
do
that
and
I
think
I've
heard
today
that
they're
not
permitted
to
do
that
that
they
would
be
constrained
by
inflationary
increases.
D
D
If
we
don't
preserve
these
units
in
perpetuity
and
we're
saying
well,
don't
worry
after
the
15
or
20-year
time
period
expires,
there
can
only
go
up
by
rate
of
inflation.
Well,
isn't
that
what's
happening
now,
anyway,
aren't
are
affordable,
housing
units
permitted
every
year
to
go
up
by
the
rate
of
inflation,
and
if
the
answer
is
yes,
then
then
what
really
changes?
What
will
change
after
15
or
20
years
so
maybe
miss?
Then
you
can
clarify
for
me.
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
There
will
be
through
the
zoning
procedures,
applications
through
site
plan.
There
will
be
continued
discussions
and
if
the
city
has
incentives
that
they're
able
to
provide
to
this
private
developer,
there
may
be
other
discussions
that
could
take
place.
But
with
respect
to
it,
you
know
expecting
that
a
private
developer
is
going
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
perpetuity
is,
is
unrealistic
and
we
don't
we've
never
acquired
that
that's
completely
outside
of
the
planning
act.
This
is
just
want
to
reiterate.
J
J
So
I
think
for
council's
purpose
this
this
this.
This
has
been
the
strongest
agreement,
we've
able
to
acquire,
and
we
have
a
number
of
other
awards
and
a
number
of
applications
that
continue
to
come
in,
and
I
really
do
think
we
need
to
focus
on
on
on
other
applications
and
opportunities
that
are
coming
up
and
use
this,
as
as
a
baseline
of
of
how
well
we've
been
able
to
acquire
this
number,
we've
got
over
a
thousand
units
under
this
agreement.
J
This
is
this
is
a
landmark.
This
is
a
home
run
with
respect
to
affordable
housing
and
the
number
of
units
that
we're
providing
this
developer
could
build
000
units
approximately
on
their
own
with
their
existing
zoning.
So
you
know:
we've.
We've.
We've
acquired
a
significant
amount
here
with
respect
to
their
density
bonusing.
So
I
hope
that
answers
your
question
counselor.
I.
D
Appreciate
look:
this.
This
motion
is
better
than
no
motion,
so
I
hope
my
colleagues
see
that
this
does
get
us
to
a
better
place.
What
I
think
many
of
us
are
concerned
about
is
what
happens
at
that
15
or
20
years.
So
just
my
final
question
to
clarify
at
the
end
of
the
15
or
20
year
period
can
hazelview
increase
the
rent
by
more
than
rate
of
inflation
and
what
gives
them
the
authority
or
power
to
do
so.
B
Mr
mayor,
I
certainly
will
not
claim
to
have
the
final
word,
but
if
a
tenant
moves
out
after
the
end
of
the
at
the
end
of
the
period,
then
the
landlord
is
entitled
to
set
the
rate
at
what
the
landlord
wishes
to
set
the
rate.
That
is
the
law
today,
and
that
would
continue
to
be
the
law.
After
the
end
of
the
period.
D
Okay,
excellent
clarification,
so
we
have
protection
for
15
or
20
years
and
colleagues
what
happens
after
that
point
once
a
tenant
moves
out
dies
no
longer
lives.
There
is
we
have
a
unit
that
is
deemed
affordable
now
and
it
may
not
be
affordable
at
that
point
and
that's
why
I'm
concerned
as
we
have
affordability
for
10
or
sorry
for
15
or
20
years
that
changes
once
a
tenant
moves
out
after
that
period
and
that's
why
I'm
concerned
because
we're
not
protecting
the
affordability,
long
term
and
that
needs
to
be
our
goal.
C
C
Mr
mark
has,
I
think,
one
of
the
most
creative
and
nimble
minds
in
municipal
planning,
probably
in
the
province
of
ontario
mr
mark,
is
there
anything
that
you're
aware
of
you
must
have
given
this
thought?
Is
there
any
mechanism
that
our
council
can
use
to
require
a
guaranteed,
affordable
housing
units
in
a
private
development
in
perpetuity
anything
in
any
planning,
act
or
rta.
B
M
C
G
Thank
you
very
much
mayor.
I
I
just
heard
something
that
I
think
is
is
really
important.
This
isn't
social
housing
we
were
just
told
and
and
we're
absolutely
right.
The
the
developer
is
not
building
social
housing.
Their
interest
is
in
profit
and
profit
only
unlike
our
not-for-profit
sector
partners.
G
This
puts
the
burden
on
the
ottawa
taxpayer
on
the
ontario
taxpayer
to
make
up
the
gap
of
the
housing
that
we're
losing.
It
is
currently
market,
affordable,
housing
with
the
help
of
programs
at
the
city
of
ottawa,
but
at
the
end
of
15
years
it
will
no
longer
be,
and
in
fact,
for
those
tenants
who
are
moving
into
affordable
new
units
today
who
are
not
currently
tenants
of
hazelview.
G
I
think
there's
a
question
as
to
whether
this
is
affordable
at
all.
Are
we
using
the
right
language
when
a
three-bedroom
unit
is
allowed
to
be
affordable
to
only
the
fifth
decile
of
income
earners
when
it's
affordable
only
to
households
are
earning
ninety
two
thousand
seven
hundred
and
eighty
four
dollars?
I
I'm
not
even
sure
we
should
be
talking
about
affordable
housing,
but
certainly
when
it
goes
to
fully
market
pricing.
G
I'm
going
to
vote
for
this
motion.
It
is,
it
is
better,
it
is
an
improvement,
but
it's
it's
not
what
we
actually
need.
In
order
to
be
able
to
try
to
really
address
the
affordable
housing
crisis,
we
are
going
to
lose
housing
that
is
affordable
to
people
and
we're
going
to
maybe
not
today,
but
tomorrow
have
to
make
up
that
gap.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
too
have
questions
to
staff
and,
and
I'm
coattailing
on
council
leapers
point
there
around
social
housing,
because
if
you
split
affordable
housing,
you
lose
sense
of
how
affordability
is
achieved.
Ultimately,
affordable
housing
is
to
those
who
can
who
can
it's
the
income
level
of
an
individual
and
it's
their
ability
to
pay
a
rent?
So
when
we
start
scanning
of
like
oh,
this
is
social
housing
versus
this
is
private
housing.
We
lose
sense
of
that.
K
M
K
K
K
I
appreciate
that
and
then
those
who
are
currently
in
timber
creek
and
will
be
moving
to
a
new
unit
within
timber
creek.
They
maintain
their
current
their
current
lease.
I
guess
so
they're
protected
in
that
environment.
That's
correct
and
is
that
does
that
ref?
Is
that
captured
in
the
thousand
six
hundred
units,
or
is
that
a
different
group?
Apart
from
that.
K
M
Okay,
thank
you.
Counselor,
some
of
the
some
of
the
households
on
the
centralized
waiting
list
for
below
market
rent
housing
would
be
you
know
suitable.
Even
some
families
in
the
emergency
shelter
system
with
a
housing
benefit
would
be
able
to
afford
some
of
these
units
as
well.
So
we
can.
We
can
look
at
that.
The
other
thing
I
would
point
out
when
it
comes
to
looking
at
you
know
affordable
housing
in
general.
It
wasn't
that
long
ago,
where
we
weren't
getting
any
rental
housing
built
whatsoever.
M
So
there
is
another
benefit
to
this
development,
and
that
is,
we
are
getting
a
lot
of
purpose-built
rental
housing
and
a
significant
portion
of
that
will
be
affordable,
housing
and
we're
protecting
the
rights
of
the
existing
tenants
to
stay
on
site,
even
if
they
have
to
be
relocated,
so
they
could
their
rents
will
stay
the
same.
I
just
wanted
to
to
remind
council
of
that
couple
of
those
points.
K
I
appreciate
that,
can
you
can
I
just
come
back
to
the
point
you
just
made.
So
if,
if
I'm
one
of
the
12
000
people
on
a
waitlist
on
a
city's,
affordable
housing
wait
list,
can
you
walk
me
through
what
that
looks
like
to
move
into
that
you
to
those
units,
and,
and
what
with
that
I
mean
you've
done
the
the
numbers,
and
you
know
how
much
we
can
given
allowances
and
so
on.
What
does
that
ultimately,
look
like.
M
Right:
okay,
thank
you
counselor,
so
somebody
on
our
wait
list.
If
they're,
if
they're
eligible
for,
for
example,
the
canada
ontario
housing
benefit,
they
would
be
given
a
portable
housing
allowance
that
would
help
them
bridge
the
gap
from
what
they
could
afford
to
what
the
rent
actually
is
and
that's
for
the
average
market
rent
unit,
only
not
the
not
the
other
units,
but
that's
how
we
would
help
them
bridge
the
gap.
K
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion.
I
understand
that
downfalls
of
the
the
challenge
of
the
15-year
or
even
the
portions
of
the
20
years.
I
think
our
battle
here
is
not
with
our
colleagues.
It's
with
the
province,
reintroducing
rent
control.
I
think
that's
the
fundamental
of
this
issue
we're
trying
to
stop
gaap
and
patch
a
number
of
failed
policies
here.
If
we
had
rent
control,
we
could
focus
on
affordability
and
then
once
the
renters
would
move
in
that
affordability
would
be
maintained
based
on
rent
control.
So
I'll
support
the
motion.
N
N
N
We
we
plan
15
years
ahead
for
transit
for
other
things
and
as
these
agreements
come
through-
and
I
expect
there'll
be
more
if
we
can
have
reports
back
on
on
how
it's
going
because
or
or
when
things
are
going
to
come
out
of
no
longer
being
affordable,
so
that
we
have
a
tracking
that
by
whatever
20
30
or
whatever,
we
know
where
we
are
and
what
we,
what
we
have
to
look
at.
I
just
want
to
know
in
terms
of
these
agreements
so
that
we
know
where
to
push.
And
what
to
do.
N
Is
that
possible?
I'm
not
thinking
necessarily,
it
needs
to
be
an
amendment
or
anything,
but
just
an
agreement
from
staff
that
that
we
will
look
at
this
and
report
back
to
council
on
how
we
keep
going
forward
so
that
we're
tracking
as
things
you
know
in
15
years.
We
don't
think
we
don't
want
to
go
poof.
We
we,
I
expect
we're
going
to
have
more
agreements
and
that
we're
going
to
have.
J
Mr
mayor,
I
know
for
this
particular
file
with
hazelview.
They
are
willing
to
provide
annual
reports
on
on
how
things
are
tracking,
with
respect
to
their
units
and
within
the
planning
department.
We
do
keep
records
of
of
the
agreements
that
we
make
in
the
in
the
number
of
units,
so
we
we
could
likely
take
direction
I'll.
Hopefully,
mr
willis
will
be
okay
with
this.
Just
in
terms
of
our
annual
reporting
to
council,
we
could
potentially
add
that
to
our
annual
reports.
N
A
J
Mayor
so
the
question
counselor
is
whether
or
not
we
would
have
overlaps,
I'm
just
not
sure,
I'm
clear.
So
we
we
will
report
out
on
you,
know
number
of
units
and
how
how
we
are
tracking
we'll
have
to
set
something
up.
This
is
new,
so
we
will.
I
think
our
direction
needs
to
be
that
will
undertake
to
review
how
we
will
report
back.
Certainly,
we
can
undertake
your
your
feedback,
but
we
will
need
to
sort
out
how
we
want
to
be
able
to
report
back.
That's
meaningful.
N
Thank
you
yeah
in
2036
15
years
from
now.
What
is
you
know?
We
we
have
this.
We
know
that's
when
things
are
going
to
expire,
further
agreements
we'll
have
different
ones
so
that
we're
tracking,
where
we
have
to
keep
pushing
for
more
affordable
housing
and
where
we
are
at
different
points,
is
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
okay.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
thank
you
just
as
a
little
historic
note.
I
think
councilor
cavanaugh,
you
were
the
first
that
were
able
to
get
a
private
developer
to
agree
to.
I
believe
it
was
eight
percent
housing,
affordable,
housing
at
bayshore,
so
you
set
the
the
the
city
on
the
process
to
continue
to
follow
your
good
example
in
that
particular
community
to
wrap
up
counselor
kids.
Would
you
like
to
wrap
up
on
your
motion.
L
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
and
and
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
the
great
discussion
that
resulted
from
the
questions
and
the
clarity
that
was
provided
by
staff.
I
hear
the
additional
concerns
you
know.
Of
course,
securing
these
units
in
in
perpetuity
would
be
ideal,
but
I
think
we
have
to
remember
that
this,
as
we
heard,
is
a
negotiation
with
a
private
sector
developer,
and
I
believe
that
the
current
residents
of
heron
gate
those
who
who
brought
these
concerns
forward
and
will
be
moving
into
some
of
these
units.
L
L
A
C
B
D
H
G
A
I
I
I
I
I
More
units
than
they
would
have
with
the
amendments
we've
given
them.
It's
important
for
council
members
to
know
that
the
so-called
affordable
housing
units
being
created
here,
based
on
the
definitions
we
have,
which
one
of
the
motions
speaks
to
for
only
15
to
20
years,
are
in
fact
less
affordable
than
the
current
market
rents
being
paid
by
tenants
and
the
community
that
exists
there,
and
so
current
residents
here
and
I
used
to
live
in
one
of
these
town
homes.
I
I
So
this
is
really
dividing
this
community,
and
the
agreement
in
front
of
us
does
set
expectations,
as
has
been
said,
but
our
expectations
given
what
has
occurred
here
should
be
greater.
We
should
expect
more.
I
understand
this
is
on
a
transit,
oriented
development
area.
More
is
coming
for
that
in
the
next
official
plan,
including
inclusionary
zoning,
which
war
would
be
expected
under
that
policy
same
with
our
anti-displacement
policy.
I
That
is
coming
so
we're
a
matter
of
months
away
from
those
types
of
things,
and
so
the
motion
in
front
of
you
now,
the
one
I'm
speaking
to
this,
is
about
asking
staff
to
go
back
with
the
board
counselor
and
the
community
to
negotiate
some
more
so
that
people
that
are
living
in
a
current
town
home
can
receive
a
town
home
as
affordable,
not
just
an
apartment.
Building.
I
The
other
two
motions
speak
to
the
definition
of
affordability
and
ask
staff
to
come
back,
which
we
had
good
conversations
with
the
planning
committee
about,
gives
us
some
more
options
for
them
to
come
back
and
give
us
what
what
is
how
do
we
determine
affordability
in
a
community
that
is
not
near
the
average
or
the
median
for
the
rest
of
the
city
such
such
as
this,
this
community?
That's
the
third
motion.
I
The
second
motion
speaks
to
asking
housing
and
planning
services
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
determine
how
proposed
rents
could
be
made
more
affordable
for
this.
For
this
community
report
back
to
committee
and
counseling
in
q1
of
2022,
and
so
I
hope
you
could
support
all
three
of
these
motions.
I
still
have
trouble
with
the
overall
deal,
as
I
say,
more
can
be
done
here
with
within
a
matter
of
months
with
the
new
official
plan
and
what
we're
talking
about
other
policies.
I
We
have
99-year
deals
in
toronto
and
in
toronto
they
got
99
years
of
affordable
housing
so
and
in
ottawa
we've
got
25
years
of
affordable
housing
in
several
developments
on
booth
street
and
otherwise,
and
that's
through
private
developers.
Canada
lands,
negotiate.
Private
developers
buy
it
25
years,
so
those
are
being
negotiated
right
now.
This
is
not
some
breakthrough,
it
is.
It
is
a
deal
that
needs
more
work
and
more
collaboration
between
current
tenants,
the
property
developer,
the
word
counsellor
and
city
staff,
and
so
that's
what
these
three
motions
ask
to
do.
I
K
H
My
understanding
from
discussions
with
councillor
buche
is
that
in
fact,
20
is
what
was
promised
and
20
is
going
to
be
what
is
being
delivered.
I'm
wondering
if
there's
anybody
on
the
staff
side
that
can
can
confirm
the
the
percentage
point
of
of
affordable
units.
Is
it
16
or
or
is
it
as
discussed
earlier
on
the
the
full
20
at
this
point.
J
H
And
and
well
I
appreciate
all
that,
that's
that's
not
the
question
I
asked
the
question
I
asked
is
you
said
it's
a
thousand
and
change
in
terms
of
the
number
of
affordable
units.
My
question
to
you
is:
were
we
able,
through
negotiations,
to
bring
them
above
their
original
position
in
terms
of
what
they
were
prepared
to
provide
in
total
number
of
affordable
units.
F
H
J
H
H
M
Thank
you
for
the
question,
mr
mayor.
We
do
contemplate
this
in
section
six
of
the
mou,
where
we
talk
about
tax
deferral,
abatement
and
development,
charge
credits,
what
we're
really
implying
there
is
that
we
want
to
leave
the
door
open
to
continue
to
work
with
hazel
vue
as
they
come
in
with
each
you
know,
pending
site
plan
or
zoning
amendment
application
to
look
at
you
know:
what
can
we
do
to
to
further
reduce
the
rents
in
these
buildings
to
make
them
more
affordable?
M
So,
as
we
stated
that
planning
committee
last
week,
you
know
this
is
the
baseline
for
us,
and
we
will
you
know
through
this
mou.
It
gives
us
a
good
starting
point.
We
know
what
the
upper
thresholds
are.
We've
agreed
to
those
and
then,
when
we
come
in
with
any
type
of
program
or
incentive
similar
to
you
know
the
the
the
porsche
dealership
you
know
tax,
you
know
a
grant
that
was
provided.
M
So
you
know
in
our
work
plan
we're
looking
at
a
community
improvement
plan
similar
one
for
affordable
housing
society,
but
that
could
potentially
apply
here
as
well.
But
but
again
we
didn't
want
to
put
any
incentives
on
the
table
now
this
early
in
the
process
we're
not
looking
at
a
site
plan
we're
not
looking
at
specific
units.
We
wanted
to
sort
of
hold
those
cards
for
future
discussions.
H
So
if
it's
contemplated,
as
you
say
in
section
6
of
the
mou
and
you've
set
out
what
the
intentions
of
of
staff
are
and
some
of
the
potential
tools
does
and
again
I
I
apologize-
I
don't
know
if
it's
motion
one
two
or
three:
I
don't
have
them
on
the
screen
in
front
of
me
from
councilman.
Does
that
motion
in
any
way
add
to
your
toolbox?
Does
it
does
it
help
staff
to
have
that
motion
passed
or
or
is
that
something
you
were
going
to
be
doing?
In
any
event,.
H
A
O
A
O
O
Okay,
okay
I'll
deal
with
the
first,
then
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
So
with
respect
to
unit
type
unit,
size
and
and
typology,
I
just
when
I'm
looking
at
this
motion.
It's
you
know
the
one
of
the
clear
concerns
that
we
heard
from
families-
and
these
are
mostly
families
that
that
we're
dealing
with
was
that,
as
it's
been
suggested
to
move
from,
you
know,
three-bedroom
town
home,
you
know
into
a
three-bedroom
apartment
without
a
yard.
O
Without
you
know
the
amenities
that
are
required
for
a
family,
a
place
to
put
your
stroller
a
place
to
put
your
bikes,
you
know
when,
when
we're
building
high-rises,
you
know
we
often
refer
to
them
as
vertical
subdivisions.
If
you
want
families
to
live
in
them,
you
have
to
have
the
amenities
that
that
are
required
so
again
that
they're
big
enough
that
they're
spacious
enough
that
there's
some
outdoor
space
that
there's
place
to
to
store
your
everyday,
you
know
needs
strollers
grocery
bags.
O
Whatever
so
was
it
ever
discussed
did?
Did
we
actually
request
from
hazelview,
and
I
know
I
was
calling
it
hazel
dean
before
that's
because
of
my
years
working
for
the
canada
councillor
way
back
hazeldu
in
my
mind,
but
hazel
view
was
it
ever
discussed
with
hazel
view
did
did?
Did
we
as
a
city
say
to
hazel
view
at
any
point
sure
you
know
moving
them
into
three-bedroom
for
three-bedroom,
but
we
want
to
ensure
that
they
have
the
amenities
that
they
need
to
function
as
a
family
for
the
better
yeah.
O
J
Mr
mayor,
that's
a
really
great
question
that
I'd
like
to
respond
to
just
to
clear
up
this
this.
This
discussion,
hazelview,
has
committed.
We've
had
those
discussions
and
I
don't
know
where
the
misinformation
has
come
from.
However,
if
you
are
a
family,
that's
living
in
a
three-bedroom,
townhouse
and
you're
going
to
be
displaced
as
part
of
this
construction
process,
you
will
be
provided
a
three-bedroom
townhouse.
You
won't
be
displaced
from
your
townhouse
and
put
into
an
apartment,
so
you
will
get
like
for
like,
plus
or
minus.
J
Let's
say
your
backyard
was
100
square
meters.
Well,
it
might
be
75
square
meters,
I'm
just
you
know
it
might
not
be
exact
for
exact
but
you're
not
going
to
be
displaced
and
put
into
a
one-bedroom
apartment
if
you're
in
a
three-bedroom,
townhouse,
so
it'll
be
town
house
for
townhouse.
I
hope
that
helps
to
clarify
counselor.
O
J
I
would
say
that
I
I
from
the
staff's
perspective,
I
don't
see
that
this
emotion
is
is
required.
This
is
where
this
is.
What
is
going
to
be
taking
place?
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
that
we
continue
the
dialogue
with
the
therefore
be
resolved,
so
this
this
just
to
confirm.
This
is
how
the
process
is
going
to
go,
and
this
is
how
hazelview
has
already
indicated.
O
O
E
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Certainly,
staff
appreciates
the
the
efforts
that
have
gone
into
the
motions.
I
would
just
like
to
reiterate
from
planning
staff's
perspective
staff
are
not
supporting
the
motions
staff
are
supporting.
The
mou
that's
been
negotiated
and
the
recommendations
that
are
in
the
staff
report.
E
Thank
you
very
much
and
mr
mary,
if
I
I'll
be
commenting
on
on
the
three
motions-
and
I
I
do
not
support
them,
the
the
three
motions
with
respect
to
number
one,
as,
as
has
been
said,
the
mou
says
same
similar
unit
same
size,
same
rent
for
for
tenants
that
are
being
displaced
as
part
of
the
phase
development
and,
and
so
I
would.
I
would
encourage
that
that
we
keep
that
in
mind,
and
that
is
indeed
in
the
mou.
E
The
memorandum
of
understand
that
is
before
you
is
the
one
that
has
been
negotiated
over
the
past
four
years.
It
is
comprehensive.
It
is
reflective
of
the
needs
of
the
residents
of
karen
gate
who
want
housing
that
is
renewed,
that
is
affordable.
That
is
comfortable,
that
is
safe
and
they
want
to
maintain
their
their
their
community
and
with
respect
to
the
third
motion
by
councillors,
menard
and
mckinney,
again,
it
seems
to
perpetuate
a
continuing
discussions,
discussions
that
will
occur,
because
this
is
an
official
plan.
E
E
I'll
remind
you
that
I
think
it's
the
official
plan
that
I've
heard
some
persons
on
council
say
that
should
be
delayed.
We
want
to
implement
some
of
the
provisions
of
the
new
draft
official
plan,
but
let's
delay
the
draft
official
plan.
We
are
dealing
with
the
official
plan
as
we
have
it
now,
with
the
planning
act
as
we
have
it
now,
and
the
improvements
that
will
be
brought
forth
as
part
of
the
new
official
plan
that
hopefully
we'll
be
dealing
with
in
october,
will
further
inform
future
agreements.
E
And
again
I
look
forward
to
to
seeing
those
future
agreements
that
have
more
than
the
20
that
we
have
here.
Councillor
kavanaugh
you
you,
you
attained
eight
percent
in
bayshore,
and
and
that
is
not
a
criticism
we
are
all
dealing
with
with
the
with
a
lack
of
framework,
and
so
I
appreciate
what
you
have
created.
E
I
appreciate
other
affordable
housing,
and
this
is
20
percent
in
heron
gate.
With
respect
to
what
council
mckinney
said.
Yes,
we
need
units.
Yes,
we
need
new
units
for
families
to
move
into
that
are
appropriate
for
the
families
inherent
gate
current
and
future,
so
that
they
could
raise
their
families
and
live
their
lives.
We
need
housing
stock,
we
need
it
now,
and
that
is
what
this
at
its
core
again.
I
will
remind
my
colleagues
that
that
is
what
this
this
application
provides.
L
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
have
one
question
with
respect
to
this
motion
at
committee.
I
asked
the
applicant
very
pointedly.
I
said
yes
or
no
answer.
Are
you
willing
to
negotiate
further
with
the
community
and
the
ward
counselor,
and
the
answer
I
got
was?
No,
so
perhaps
staff
leanne
can
answer
this
question.
I
mean
what
happens
if
the
applicant
is
simply
not
amenable
to
renegotiating.
J
Also,
mr
mayor,
we've
negotiated
this
mou
for
the
official
plan
amendment
at
this
at
this
stage.
If,
through
the
zoning
and
site
plan
application
phases,
the
city
is
able
to
provide
further
incentives
to
help
incentivize
this
private
developer,
there
could
be
further
discussions
around
what's
being
provided
right
now,
but
in
terms
of
not
providing
any
incentives.
J
G
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
sorry.
I
I
I'm
just
struck
by
the
the
previous
comment
by
ms
sneddon
in
terms
of
you
know
the
affordability
of
this
deal
for
the
developer.
I
just
we're
not
talking
about
what
is
affordable
to
the
developer.
This
is
what
the
developer
feels
that
they
can
accomplish,
while
still
making
the
profit
that
they
intend
to
make
in
this
development.
G
You
know
it's
we're
talking
about
affordability
of
housing,
to
people
who
actually
can't
afford
to
pay
more
than
they
are
paying
for
their
housing
today
versus
the
affordability
of
whether
or
not
profit
can
be
maintained
at
the
desired
level
on
the
part
of
investors.
So
it's
important
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
continue
this
discussion.
G
I
just
wanted
to
clear
up.
Maybe
what
I'm
hearing
as
inconsistency
in
what
I've
heard
this
morning,
I'm
hearing
that
these
motions
are
not
necessary,
because
staff
intend
to
continue
to
try
to
press
where
they
can
to
get
better,
but
I'm
also
hearing
that
staff
support
the
current
deal
is
it?
Is
it
staff's
intention
to
try
if
we
can
to
get
a
better
deal.
J
J
Mr
mayor,
we've
we've
been
negotiating
this
file
for
four
years.
We
have
23
boards
in
this
city.
We
have
other
files
and
applications
we
need
to
deal
with
our
application.
Numbers
are
up
20
as
we
are
today.
We
don't
not
have
the
staff
capacity
to
continue
these
negotiations
and
discussions
from
the
staff's
perspective.
We
have
worked
very
closely
with
the
ward
councillor
and
have
full
support
for
what
this
deal
provides.
Members
of
council
and
this
this
is
our
position.
B
Okay,
mr
mayor,
may
I
I
may
I
add
to
msn's
comments,
because
I
want
to
an
important
flavor
to
this.
We
are
talking
about
a
voluntary
memorandum
of
understanding
that
only
exists,
because
we
have
two
willing
parties
to
talk
about
it,
which
is
the
city
and
the
developer.
The
developer
always
already
has
rights
to
go
to
the
ontario
lands
tribunal
for
a
failure
to
make
a
decision
by
the
city.
B
If
the
city
passes
motions
that
create
no
end
date
to
the
discussion,
the
developer
could
use
that
as
an
excuse
to
go
to
the
olt
and
the
olt
would
have
no
regard
for
the
mou
at
all,
because
it's
not
a
land
use
planning
matter
under
the
planning
act
and
we
could
very
well
risk
losing
everything
we've
gained
in
an
olt
decision
that
would
not
cover
this
at
all.
So
staff's
concern
is,
if
we
don't
create
an
end
to
the
discussion,
we
risk
losing
it
all.
That's
our
concern.
G
So
that
is
helpful
in
terms
of
clarifying
some,
what
I
think
I've
been
hearing
this
morning
as
inconsistency.
If
we
pass
this
opa
today,
there
there
aren't
going
to
be
further
discussions
about
trying
to
get
a
better
deal.
This
is
the
deal
we
have
unless
we
are
able
to
offer
up
incentives
that
will
cost
the
ottawa
taxpayer
money.
G
That
is
helpful
clarity,
and
I
guess
I
would
ask
my
colleagues
to
to
support
and
I
won't
speak
to
each
of
the
three
emotions,
but
I
would
ask
my
colleagues
to
support
council
menards
motions,
because
the
the
audience
for
this
debate
is
is
not
just
us
and
it's
not
just
the
tenants
who
are
currently
at
herron
gate.
It
is.
G
We
may
not
have
the
tools
that
we
need
from
the
province
and
I'm
cynical
that
the
province
is
going
to
give
us
those
tools,
but
we
have
the
opportunity
today
to
say
our
cities
are
not
going
to
be
bought
up
by
large
developers,
backed
by
billions
of
dollars
of
investment.
To
turn
housing
that
is
affordable
for
people
today
into
a
commodity
from
which
the
greatest
possible
profit
can
be
squeezed,
and
when
we
talk
about
is
this
deal
affordable
if
this
deal
is
affordable
to
the
developer,
that
leaves
me
queasy.
G
Colleagues,
we
have
to
ask
our
staff
to
try
to
do
better
in
the
wake
of
or
in
the
absence
of
any
further
help
from
our
federal
and
provincial
partners.
Please,
let's.
Let's
support
council
bernard's
motion,
counselor
mckinney's
motion
and
and
demand
better
of
these
large
developers,
who
can
almost
certainly
afford
it.
None
of
them
are
going
to
lose
housing
if
a
better
deal
is
sought.
Thank
you.
A
K
Taking
advantage
of
or
are
able
to
access,
we
know
the
shortfalls
of
that
program
as
it
relates
to
ensuring
that
members,
that
of
our
community
that
are
on
the
social
housing
waiting
list
do
get
kind
of
a
plug-in
to
the
affordable
unit.
So
I
would
like
some
clarity
on
within
the
agreement
that
you're
bringing
forward
to
us
are
the
affordable
units
outside
of
those
who
have
previous
or
existing
tenancy
rights
at
that
location,
ensuring
that
they're
coming
from
our
our
waiting
lists.
M
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
for
that
question
counselor,
I
I
we.
We
can't
answer
that
at
this
time.
We're
not
aware
of
you
know
whether
or
not
the
the
applicant
is
actually
going
to
agree
to
take
on
any
financing
or
special
programs
from
cmhc
for
this
development.
I
think
they've
mentioned
they've
made
an
application,
but
they
have
not.
You
know
they
have
not
come
to
any
specific
agreement
on.
You
know
accessing
our
cfi
or
any
other
type
of
federal
program.
K
What
would
be
amended?
Oh
sorry,
I
got
feedback
here.
What
would
need
to
be
amended
in
the
agreement
to
ensure
that
the
identified
affordable
units,
I
think
you're,
there's
around
from
what
I
from
our
previous
conversation
earlier
today,
was
around
400?
What
would
it
take
to
ensure
that
those
400
units
that
are
affordable
that
are
on
you
know,
unassigned
come
to
for
those
who
are
on
our
current
waiting
list
for
affordable
housing.
M
Thank
you,
counselor.
The
applicant
has
already
reached
out
to
discuss
the
process
that
we'd
undertake,
so
we
you
know,
we
do
have
other
examples
of
how
we
could
structure
the
the
intake
of
tenants.
Do
that,
and
you
know
it's
something
that
we
will
have
to
work
through
the
logistics
with
the
applicant,
but
their
intent
is
to
work
with
us
to
figure
out
how
to
identify
and
select
tenants
that
move
into
those
units.
K
So
how
do
we
get
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
council
members
here
are
interested
in
making
sure
that
we're
making
the
right
decisions?
I
know
jaws
in
a
very,
very
involved
in
in
this
and
making
sure
that
we
get
the
best
outcome
for
residents
of
this
community,
but
also
the
city,
but
one
of
the
loose
ends
is
exactly
that
one.
So
I
understand
intent.
But
how
do
we
confirm
do
we
need
to
amend
the
agreement?
M
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
think,
within
the
current
contract
we
can
work
all
that
out
with
with
hazelview
with
with
the
applicant,
like,
I
said
that
we
do
have
processes
in
place
with
the
with
the
social
housing
registry
that
maintains
it
below
market
wait
list.
One
of
the
issues
we
often
have
with
the
waitlist
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
tenants
that
want
to
move
to
that
specific
location,
so
it'll
happen
on
a
gradual
basis
as
they
come
in
with
each
building
and
the
unit
become
available.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
a
question
counselor
mckinney
had
asked
earlier
about,
and
the
reply
from
ms
netan,
who
indicated
that
there
would
be
replacement
of
townhome
for
townhome.
I
just
wondered
if
you
could
tell
us
how
many
town
homes
are
currently
on
the
site
and
how
many
are
planned
at
the
end
of
build
out.
J
Q
A
I
R
I
J
Q
B
J
J
That
I
don't
know
if
I've
got
the
break
if
we've
received
the
breakdown
to
that.
But
mr
mayor
just
give
me
a
minute
I'll
confirm
whether
or
not
we
have
that
breakdown.
No,
I
yeah,
I
was
correct.
We
do
not
have
that
breakdown
we're
still.
At
the
official
plan
amendment
level
we
haven't
gone
into
the
zoning
and
the
site
plan.
Q
J
A
Okay,
thank
you,
colleagues.
I
would
encourage
members
of
council
not
to
support
this
motion.
You've
heard
very
clearly
from
staff,
both
legal
and
planning.
It's
not
required.
It's
duplicating
efforts.
You
know
we
want
to
get
shovels
in
the
ground
for
these
affordable
housing
units.
We
don't
want
to
have
a
never-ending
series
of
meetings
and
bilaterals
that
accomplishes
very
little.
We
know
that
the
final
position
of
the
the
organization
at
what
it
is
and
it's
time
to
actually
move
on
and
stop
talking
about
housing
and
start
building,
affordable
housing,
so
yays
and
nays
on.
I
A
I
A
I
A
E
G
E
R
F
D
L
G
A
A
I
No,
I
don't
need
to
if
you
could
just
put
it
up
on
the
screen,
though
so
people
can
read
it,
which
is
what
I
was
going
to
say
in
my
wrap
up,
which
you
should
have
afforded
me
was
just
that
the
motion
previously
did
not
talk
about
anything
to
do
with
delaying
an
mou
or
the
sight
plants.
It
was
very
clear
in
the
motion
with
regard
to
this
one.
I
All
this
is
talking
about
is
the
review
of
the
methodology
for
affordable
rent
calculation,
which
we've
heard
should
be
looked
at
both
at
the
community
level
and
citywide.
It
just
should
be
a
median
or
an
average,
especially
when
we
have
communities
such
as
this.
So
I
hope
that
this
can
be
supported.
Planning
committee
did
talk
about
bringing
back
reports
to
it
and
having
a
greater
discussion
about
this,
this
enables
that
to
happen
in
q1
of
2022.
So
I
hope
members
can
support
this.
O
O
It's
one
thing
to
ask
for
rents
to
you,
know,
be
reduced
a
little
bit
to
get
a
bit
of
a
you
know.
A
few
hundred
dollars
off,
but
average
median
household
income
is
very
high
in
the
city
of
ottawa,
making
average
median
making
that
you
know
which
half
of
these
units
are
tied
to
exceptionally
unaffordable.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
on
my
salary
alone,
if
I
were
alone,
I
could
not
afford
any
unit
that
use
average
median
income
to
tag
affordability.
O
O
So
as
we're
building
one
we're
losing
seven
and
that's
not
changing
every
time
we
take
taxpayer
dollars
and
we
invest
them
in
affordable
housing.
In
this
city
we
lose
at
least
seven
affordable
market
rents,
and
we
do
have
the
option
today
of
saying
you
know
what
these
are:
not
affordable.
Housing
units,
we
really
have
nothing
to
lose
I'll,
be
honest
with
you.
O
These
are
not
affordable
housing
units.
This
is
a
bit
of
a
break
on
some
rants,
but
that's
it.
So
unless
we
can
go
back
and
come
back
and
say
you
know
what
this
is,
what
our
residents!
These
are
people
living
in
our
city
who
need
us
to
stand
up
for
them
and
say
you
know
what
we'll
go
back
and
we'll
try
and
get
you
a
rent
that
you
can
afford.
O
It's
a
rent
that
you
can
afford
that
you
can
go
away
and
buy
your
kids
school
supplies
so
that
they
can
go
off
to
school.
It's
a
rent
that
you
can
afford,
where
you're
not
going
to
have
to
use
a
food
bank
you're
not
going
to
have
to
go
and
get
a
charitable
donation
for
snow
suits
for
your
kids.
It's
rents
that
you
will
be
able
to
afford
because
we
know
you
are
out
you're
working,
you're
working
hard,
you're
those
front
line
workers.
Often
we
called
heroes
through
this
pandemic.
O
O
So
this
is
not
going
to
allow
for
that.
These
are
not
affordable,
housing
units
and
if
we
say
yes
today
to
what's
in
front
of
us,
we
are
ignoring
the
fact
that
these
are
not
affordable
housing
units
and
the
families
there
will
not
be
able
to
function
as
full
functioning
members
of
society.
The
way
that
you
and
I
can
so
I
would
encourage
you
to
at
least
ask
for
staff
to
go
back
and
think
about
what
affordability
is
it's.
O
N
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
raised
this
point
at
the
committee.
I
asked
about
using
another
example
of
neighborhood,
but
the
point
was
made
that
that
would
be
alta
vista
and
that
would
make
it
worse
and
that
that
is
not
the
intention
I
had.
I
just
want
to
ask
the
mover
how
he
saw
it
that,
in
terms
of
neighborhood
of
of
what
was
classified
in
neighborhood,
because
I
do
think
going
forward,
we
have
to
look
at
these
because
the
city-wide
definition
has
been
pointed
out
by
councillor.
Mckenney
is
quite
high.
I
Great
question
kessler,
and
I
did
of
course
taking
your
question.
That's
a
large
part
where
this
this
came
from
is
that
city
staff
would
be
reviewing
the
methodology
for
affordable
rank
calculation,
either
at
the
neighborhood
or
ward
level,
and
they
look
at
the
data
available.
So
we
do
have
data
for
hair
and
gate.
We
do
have
demographic
data,
we
have
stats,
can
data
so
we're
able
to
to
get
into
more
specifics,
and
in
this
case,
staff
would
go
away.
I
Look
at
that
data
so
that
we
could
have
a
better,
affordable,
rent
calculation
potential,
but
ask
them
to
do
that
work
exactly
what
you're
saying
wouldn't
necessarily
take
into
account
all
of
alta
vista
or
other
neighboring
areas.
They'd!
Try
to
use
the
data
from
this
area,
specifically
but
report
back
on
to
us
on
what
they
would
find
so
appreciate
that
question.
K
Jump
in
on
this-
and
I
have
a
question
too-
maybe
following
that-
so
I
understand
the
the
the
report
that's
in
front
of
us,
but
for
the
mover.
How
would
we
see
this
going
forward,
like
I
I'm
hearing
from
the
department
that
there's
a
number
of
negotiations
that
are
happening
with
other
applicants
and
I
wonder
the
risk
of
creating
kind
of
micro,
affordability
or
micro
situations
within
neighborhoods
and
and
then
risking
removing
choices
for
for
families
and
tenants,
depending
on
their
their
family
situation.
I
Thanks
kelser,
it's
really
to
ensure
we
don't
have
the
displacement
that
we're
seeing.
We
are
happy.
We
have
anti-displacement
policies
coming,
of
course,
in
the
official
new
official
plan
which
we've
heard
about,
but
in
this
case
the
people
that
are
currently
living
in
herrongate
or
in
the
surrounding
local
community
there,
under
the
circumstances
of
the
affordable
housing
definitions
that
we're
putting
in
they
normally
would
not
be
able
to
stay
there.
A
E
C
N
D
E
R
D
H
G
A
A
I
This
is
something
that
we
can
look
at
through
those
those
processes
that
we're
going
to
be
seeing.
Other
applications
come
forward
in
this
process,
and
this
is
something
that
the
community,
the
ward
councillor,
local
residents,
can
can
work
on,
and
so
at
this
point
we're
hoping
that
this
occurs.
This
could
be
through
city
subsidized,
affordable
housing.
I
We're
not
talking
about
20,
which
is
what
was
committed
before
we're
talking
about
16,
so
it
is
getting
to
the
level
that
they
said
and
they
committed
to
that
they'd
get
to
developers,
often
say
one
thing
and
do
another.
It's
really
unfortunate
we're
seeing
bait
and
switches
constantly,
whether
it's
you
know
bedrooms
and
basements,
where
they
come
back
for
it.
They
say
it's
not
going
to
be
there
or
whether
it's
you
know
kind
of
selling
off
properties
that
they
said
they
wouldn't
be
selling
off
because
and
demolishing
them.
I
These
are
things
that
happen
a
lot
in
our
city
and
it
really
shouldn't
be
allowed
to
happen.
If
you
commit
to
something
to
a
community
up
front
and
say
we're
going
to
have
affordable
housing
on
this
site,
like
we
heard
from
some
developers
in
my
ward,
who
then
backtracked
on
that
promise,
or
if
you
hear
we're
going
to
have
20,
affordable
housing,
but
then
you
end
up
with
16
it's
just
about
holding
developers
to
their
work,
so
I
hope
this
council
can
do
that.
D
Thanks
american
staff
just
help
me
better
understand
it's
the
last
few
words
of
this
motion
within
the
development
through
any
upcoming
zoning
and
site
plan
agreement
processes.
How
do
we
leverage
what
council
menard
is
asking
for
at
that
stage?
Could
ms
nine
elaborate
for
me
just
so?
I
can
better
understand.
D
J
If
if
there
were
incentives
that
came
from
the
city's
program
that
were
able
to
incentivize,
then
then
there
could
be
some
opportunity
for
discussion,
but
the
intent
of
this
mou
is
it's.
It's
a
signed
document
and
and
staff
are,
are
not
recommending.
As
mr
willis
has
pointed
out,
we
do
run
that
risk
that
we
could
be
losing
this
agreement
altogether.
So
we
do
not
recommend
at
this
point
in
time
any
further
negotiations
with
respect
to
the
amount
of
affordable
housing
we've
acquired.
D
B
D
Final,
four:
okay.
So
when
we
sit
down
for
zoning
and
cite
a
plan,
the
mou
will
have
been
signed,
but
we
can
still
talk.
If
both
parties
agree
to
make
changes,
then
you
can
modify
the
agreement
so
I'll.
Let
councillor
monarch
speak
for
himself,
but
I'm
just
saying
if
we
have
other
opportunities
to
have
the
discussion
to
increase
affordable
housing,
it's
not
going
to
threaten
the
mou
because
we
will
have
signed
the
mou
right,
they're
not
going
to
backtrack.
D
D
For
this
purpose,
I
don't
think
that's
necessary.
I
think
you're
you're,
adding
folks
to
the
discussion.
We
know
what
the
position
is
of
the
community.
I
don't
think
that
piece
is
necessary.
I
think
that
piece
should
come
should
come
out
if
you're
going
to
talk
about
affordable
housing,
it
should
really
between
the
city,
councillor
and
applicant,
at
this
point
and
I'm
not
trying
to
discount
the
local
community.
I'm
just
saying
I
don't
think
at
this
point
in
the
game.
You
need
to
bring
them
into
it,
so
we
all
want
to
get
more,
affordable
housing.
D
A
N
D
G
A
F
A
D
Thank
you
mayor
just
trying
to
remember
which
one
it
is
here.
Okay,
so
I
spoke
at
the
beginning.
This
is
really
a
documentation
of
the
process
to
document
best
practices.
Staff
are
on
board
with
this,
and
this
can
be
done
by
mid-year
next
year.
So
again,
I
believe
there
will
be
more
of
of
these
memoranda
in
the
future.
D
It'd
be
great
not
to
you
know,
recreate
things
from
scratch
for
for
different
members
of
council
going
through
this,
but
a
really
good.
It's
it's
good
practice
to
have
a
documentation
of
this.
It's
a
multi-year
process,
and
I
would
certainly
like
to
learn
from
this.
I
do
think
this
is
going
to
happen
in
riverward
at
some
point
as
well.
So
if
folks
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
take
them.
D
D
So
it's
it's
no
cost
to
hazel
view,
but
really
this
is
to
inform
previous
tenants
who
were
evicted
of
the
opportunity
to
come
back
if
they
qualify
for
affordable
housing
unit.
Make
them
aware
that
that
this
is
there,
so
this
is
just
to
match
what
has
been
requested
by
the
community.
Thank
you,
mayor.
A
N
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
mayor,
and
thank
you
to
my
seconder.
What
we
heard
from
the
debates
to
play
we
are
talking
about.
Affordable
housing
and
affordable
housing
is
needed
because
people
have
low
incomes
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
bring
about
an
opportunity
to
have
better
incomes,
and
this
was
an
issue
that
was
raised
by
several
of
the
speakers.
N
The
delegations
and
it
struck
me
that
we
we
needed
to
have
that
as
a
mou
as
well,
and
I
see
that
there's
cooperation
on
that
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
ottawa
district
labor
council
for
their
offer
to
to
be
part
of
it
as
as
well.
I
think
that's
really
important
that
we're
talking
about
wages,
union
wages,
trades
and
and
opportunities
for
people
to
earn
a
better
living.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
A
H
A
N
A
Q
Thanks,
mr
mayor,
I
actually
wanted
to
ask
questions.
This
is
the
first
opportunity
there
has
been
for
questions
on
the
official
plan
amendment.
So
I
know
council
has
been
very
seized
with
the
aspect
of
affordable
housing
on
this
site,
and
rightly
so,
but
as
the
member
counsel
for
the
neighboring
community
of
hetherington,
I
am
very
aware
of
what
it
takes
to
revitalize.
The
neighborhood
and
councillor
harder
will
will
know,
is
her
time.
As
chair
of
the
planning
committee,
she
was
very
helpful
in
the
hetherington
community
in
and
working
through.
Q
All
of
the
issues
that
come
with
density
would
come
with
high
highly
racialized
communities,
with
a
lot
of
new
canadians
occupying
those
units
and
to
me
amenity
space
park.
Space
open
space,
green
space
is
absolutely
imperative,
especially
when
you're
talking
about
densification
and
this
neighborhood.
Q
Currently
just
looking
at
the
mlu
currently
has
eighteen
hundred
and
sixty
four
units
at
build
hunt
build
out.
This
community
will
have
6
427
units,
so
a
significant
increase
and
even
an
increase
of
1439
units
over
what
is
currently
allowed.
So
a
lot
more
density
on
the
site
than
was
originally
inten
intended
and,
with
that
to
me,
comes
a
real
obligation
to
consider
the
green
space
parks
that
are
there
currently
the
amenity
space
and
how
it
will
function
for
that
community.
Q
And
when
I
look
at
the
official
plan
amendment
where
we
are
today,
hazel
view
can
build
3
200
units
and
all
they
were
required
for
the
first
3
200
units
is
a
front
ending
agreement,
350
thousand
dollars
for
improvements
in
sandalwood
park.
That's
it
with
3
200
units,
and
you
know
I
I
I
can't
project
the
future,
maybe
15
years
from
now,
we'll
get
to
the
point
where
they
convey
a
hectare
and
a
half
of
land
to
the
city
for
open
space
on
the
site,
but
that's
way
down
the
road.
Q
Q
We
need
open
spaces
and
we
need
good
amenity
spaces
in
our
park
and
to
me
what
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
today
is
just
highly
inadequate.
So
I
guess
my
question
is,
and
council
clutie
and
I've
had
an
opportunity
to
discuss
this.
But
how
would
we
go
about
ensuring
that
we
do
a
lot
better
than
this
moving
forward.
Q
L
L
I
feel
it's
important
to
to
provide
some
basic
effects
to
begin
with.
On
the
side
area,
total
is
21
hectares,
and
that
includes
number
of
collector
roads
and
the
local
rules
that
are
already
under
the
public
ownership,
so
they
actually
develop.
Developmental
land
is
about
1800
within
the
18
hectares
that
are
subject
to
the
official
planet.
Amendment
area
there's
one
block
that
is
already
developed,
which
is
known
as
the
local
vista
switch.
L
Q
Okay,
well,
I
would
never
never
actually
think
taking
cash
and
lieu
in
an
area
like
this
would
be
a
good
idea,
but
why
was
why
was
there
an
agreement
to
wait
to
until
50
percent
build
out
of
the
entire
site
before
we
would
take
that
land?
Why
why
I
mean
I
understand
they
have
to
take
buildings
down,
but
why
wouldn't
we
have
wanted
to
get
more
in
the
front
end
of
the
agreement
in
terms
of
park
redevelopment
of
the
sandalwood
park?
Q
That's
there
now
it
could
use
a
significant
overhaul
and
a
million
dollars
or
about
that
with
everybody
kicking
in
is
going
to
buy
very
little
in
terms
of
that
park
redevelopment
they
can
build
3200
units
before
they
ever
have
to
convey
any
land
to
us.
So
why
wouldn't
we
have
worked
to
get
more
in
the
front
end.
B
Mr
mayor,
maybe
I
can
start
by
answering
the
question.
I
wasn't
involved
directly
in
the
negotiations,
but
we
were
dealing
with
a
package
deal
of
negotiations
where
we
put
a
high
degree
of
priority
on
affordable
housing.
So
you
know
in
our
council
sets
the
policy
on
the
parks,
dedication,
bylaws-
and
this
is
an
issue
that's
being
looked
at
in
the
parks
and
recreation
master
plan
update.
Ultimately,
our
colleagues
in
rcfs
do
guide
us
on
what
we
take
in
what
order.
B
B
So
again,
I'll
go
back
I'll,
go
back
to
that.
We
have
established
policies
in
place
that
will
guide
each
subsequent
planning
application.
It's
also
guided
by
the
mou
in
this
instance,
and
we
will
have
these
discussions
as
every
application
comes
forward.
But
as
msu
explained
there
is,
there
is
a
sequencing
of
the
development
on
the
site
that
guides
how
the
the
areas
are
going
to
be
developed.
What's
going
to
be
available
at
what
time.
Q
Q
C
Thank
you
mayor.
I
have,
I
guess,
a
couple
questions
for
staff.
First
of
all,
we've
heard
a
number
of
times
in
this
discussion.
Things
like
inclusionary
zoning
policy,
anti-displacement
policy
could
staff
give
us
a
quick
overview
of
any
significant
policy
reports
that
we'll
be
receiving
that
relate
to
affordable
housing
between
now
and
the
end
of
this
term
of
council.
B
Mr
mayor
I'll
just
quickly
answer
that
question.
First
of
all,
in
order
to
bring
any
of
those
policies
forward,
we
need
the
new
official
plan
in
place
in
order
to
create
the
enabling
policy
without
the
official
plan.
Those
policies
cannot
be
brought
forward
under
provincial,
the
principal
policy
statement,
so
staff
are
working
on
the
inclusionary
zoning
work
and
there
is
work
information
coming
out
later.
B
This
fall
on
our
proposals
on
inclusionary
zoning
and
mr
saya
can
can
add
to
this
because
he's
been
working
more
closely
with
the
project
and
we
are
looking
at
the
legal
feasibility
of
the
housing
stock
protection
work
right
now
and
hope
to
report
to
council
with
they
will
be
reported
on
this
term.
We're
just
waiting
for
result,
information
back
on
our
legal
review
on
the
feasibility
and
what
our
powers
are.
I
want
to
emphasize
again.
B
M
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
yeah.
The
only
thing
I
would
add
is
when
we
bring
forward
the
background
study
for
the
inclusionary
zoning.
You
know
we
expect
to
have
a
very
fulsome
discussion
about
the
definition
of
affordable
housing
in
that
document,
so
this
will
come
back
and
we
will
have
an
opportunity
to
to
continue
looking
at
average
market
rent
and
if
we
should
be
using
something
different
as
well.
C
M
I
think
I
think
yes,
we'll
have
a
good
discussion
through
inclusionary
zoning.
We
continue
to
ask
this
question
as
well
in
housing
services,
and
it's
not
my
intention
to
confuse
anyone
with
the
definition
of
affordable
housing.
It's
just
that
with
you
know,
between
federal
and
provincial
governments,
we
deal
with
many
different
definitions.
You
know,
depending
on
what
whatever
program
we're
working
with
at
that
time,
but
we
do
recognize
that
we
need
a
better
working
definition
going
forward
and
I
think
the
inclusionary
zoning
would
be
a
really
good.
C
C
I
spoke
a
bit
about
this
at
planning
committee,
but
but
I
am
struggling
with
what's
fair
and
reasonable
to
ask
a
private
developer
and
that's
a
question
that
is
an
economic
consideration.
It's
a
social
and
moral
responsibility
consideration
and
it's
also
has
to
be
in
consideration
of
our
policy
and
of
provincial
laws
and
legislation.
C
I
think
we
also
have
to
acknowledge
again
that
there
are
over
12
000
people
on
a
waiting
list
for
affordable
housing.
We
do
have
a
housing
crisis,
a
housing
emergency,
and
there
are
a
number
of
ways
that
we
can
need
to
continue,
tackling
that
we
just
carried
the
capital
strategy
outlining
our
2021
and
2022
capital
plan
for
social
housing.
We
do
have
the
official
plan
coming
up.
There
are
negotiated
agreements
underway
continuing
with
a
number
of
private
developers.
These
need
to
continue.
C
There
are
mechanisms
we
have
under
section
37
negotiations
for
community
benefits
and
there's
inclusionary
zoning,
and
I
know,
there's
also
some
work
underway
along
community
improvement
plans
that
would
consider
affordable
housing
as
an
eligible
grant
or
tax
rebate
process.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
start
in
terms
of
what
a
memorandum
of
understanding
should
look
like
with
the
private
developer.
C
But
clearly
there
is
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
improvement
that
we
need
to
do
going
forward,
and
I
I
hope
it
only
gets
better
from
here,
but
thank
you
to
counselor
clutier
and
the
staff
and
to
other
members
of
council
who've
been
involved
in
getting
us
to
this
point
I'll,
be
supporting
the
report
as
amended
and
encourage
colleagues
too
as
well.
Thank
you.
R
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
briefly
on
a
couple
things
I
think
you
know
the
overall
there's
a
conversation
here
happening
about
one
application,
an
official
plan
amendment
and
there's
bigger
picture
stuff.
That's
also
happening-
and
I
think
emotion
from
from
council
brockington
speaking
to
future
mousse
is
a
positive
saying
that
this
could
be
a
standard
for
the
future
that
we
should
consider.
I
look
back
to
100
bayshore.
R
This
one,
this
one
goes
a
bit
further.
The
next
one
goes
even
further.
I
think
that's
what
we
have
to
keep
on
working
toward
don't
get
lost
in
the
in
the
one
project,
but
look
toward
the
future
and
continue
building
on
this
and
and
being
better.
I
heard
a
comment
earlier
that
voting
against
this,
because
what
do
we
have
to
lose?
R
R
So
we
can't
sit
here
and
vote
on
one
issue
and
pretend
it's
the
bigger
picture
issue.
It's
not.
We
know
it's
not.
We
have
more
work
to
do.
I
don't
think
anyone
around
this
table
will
will
argue
that,
but
we
have
to
look
at
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
and
we
have
to
look
at
the
people
that
are
living
in
that
community
today
and
what
protections
are
offered
for
them
through
the
mou.
R
Don't
risk
losing
this
battle
as
if
the
people
involved
don't
matter
and
because
it's
a
bigger
picture
that
we
need
to
look
at
to
win
that
war,
we
need
to
win
the
war.
We
need
to
win
the
little
battles
here
throughout
this
process
too.
We
can't
risk
it
all.
We
can't
risk
it
on
on
the
merits
of
of
of
this
one
issue
and
at
the
risk
of
the
the
residents
that
lived
there
today
in
herron
gate,
we
do
owe
them
something
they
were
failed.
R
F
R
But
we
have
to
keep
working
toward
that
and
I
think
some
of
the
stuff
that
we're
talking
about
councilor
gower
is
just
talking
with
syed
about
what's
to
come.
I've
talked
before
council
mckinney
and
I
and
saeed
have
talked
about.
Could
we
do
a
cip
for
affordable
housing
in
this
city?
I
think
so.
I
think
we
could,
and
I
think
we
should
look
at
that.
So
I
think
we
need
to
keep
on
working
in
the
same
direction,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
take
these
these
steps
and
consider
them
hills
to
die
on.
R
We
have
a
good
thing
in
front
of
us
here.
I
think
cancer
clutch
has
worked
heavily
with
this
community.
I
think
a
number
of
counselors
on
this
on
this
screen.
I've
worked
heavily
on
this
project
as
well.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
involved.
Syed
geez.
I
don't
think
we
could
have
a
better
person
in
that
role
right
now,
but
so
I
appreciate
that
work
and
and
everyone's
efforts
here,
thanks.
F
F
F
K
One
we
have
to
recognize
today,
as
as
mr
willis
advised
to
us.
We
have
to
have
the
right
policies
in
place
prior
to
applications
coming
in.
What
we
recognize
today
is
that
we
have
major
gaps.
We
have
major
gaps
to
prevent
renovations.
We
have
major
gaps
to
include
affordability.
We
have
a
desire
to
see
more
rental.
We
have
a
desire
to
see
more
intensification
and
all
of
those
worlds
make
it
very
complicated.
K
K
Those
are
really
complicated
and
deep
questions,
and
I
my
vote
today
is
in
no
time
in
relation
to
the
effort
of
an
agreement.
My
vote
will
be
in
in
really
pushing
the
city
to
really
be
aggressive
in
bringing
the
right
levels
of
bylaws
as
it
relates
to
renovictions
and
and
really
help
council
shape
what
we
can
do
and
when
we
must
do
in
relations
to
affordability,
floating
of
affordability
and
various
programs
and
saeed
highlighted.
Well,
it's
complicated
a
lot
of
players
involved.
It's
not
fair
for
council,
it's
not
fair
to
do
that.
K
On
on
the
air,
we
have
to
get
the
right
fundamentals
in
place,
so
then,
when
a
project
comes
to
be,
we
know
what
levers
and
what
tools
we
have,
and-
and
certainly
throughout
this
journey,
that
john
and
acorn
and
his
community
have
brought
forward.
We've
we've
all
informed
ourselves
and-
and
that's
certainly
a
worthwhile
learning
experience.
I
think
it
is
the
first
step.
It's
it's
a
lot
of
effort
to
get
us
there,
but
we
need
to
do
more.
K
We
need
to
have
the
right
fundamentals
in
place,
to
prevent
renovations,
to
increase,
affordable
housing
and
to
see
how
intensification
doesn't
mean
gentrification.
I
think
that's
a
major
challenge
that
we
will
face
in
some.
Some
areas
of
the
city,
specifically
as
as
rental
housing
stock
is
on
the
private
side,
is,
is
up
for
renewal
in
many
instances.
So
I
I'll
conclude
my
comments
there,
mr
ray.
E
E
E
This
application
doesn't
solve
the
entire
problem,
but
it
is
over
a
thousand
affordable
housing
units
for
a
minimum
15
20
years
and
the
residents
of
herron
gate
in
the
10
pub
or
so
public
consultations
that
I've
had
that.
We've
had
have
been
quite
clear,
eliminate
evictions
and
displacement,
no
matter
what
the
residential
tenancies
act
says.
E
They
want
that
security.
They
want
it
now
protect
households
and
guarantee
like
for
like
housing
at
the
same
rent,
guarantee
us
that
now
approve
much-needed
improvements
to
sandalwood
park
now,
in
addition
to
a
future
park
and
future
community
space
that
will
be
part
of
the
application
and
more
housing
stock,
more
housing
choice
that
is
comfortable,
up-to-date,
modern,
productive,
safe
and
affordable,
and
now
we
need
that
now
and
the
residents
of
herron
gate
can't
face
more
delays
and
more
uncertainty.
And
we
have
that
opportunity
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
that
certainty
for
them
today.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
counselor
I'd
like
to
add
my
voice
to
to
congratulate
you.
Counselor
klutzy.
You've
worked
really
hard
on
this
file
for
over
four
years,
a
lot
of
negotiations,
a
lot
of
support
from
councillor
harder,
our
former
planning
chair
and
councillors,
moffett
and
gower.
The
current
co-chairs
of
planning,
as
well
as
our
staff,
leanne
sneddon
tim
marks,
steve
willis,
sayed,
syed
parks
and
recreation
staff.
This
was
a
full
court
press
to
do
whatever
we
could
to
bring
about
as
many
affordable
housing
units
as
possible
and
as
miss
sneddon
indicated.
A
That
would
be
brought
into
the
inventory
of
the
course
in
the
next
couple
of
years.
Now,
the
last
time
we
had
a
similar
situation,
every
single
member
of
council
to
my
knowledge,
voted
for
councillor
kavanaugh's
great
work
that
she
did
that
brought
eight
percent
of
the
units
into
affordable
housing.
A
A
They
would
they
currently
have
as
a
right
to
permission
to
build
nearly
5
000
units
and
multiple
low-rise
six-story
buildings
in
the
in
this
site
and
as
a
result
of
this
negotiations
that
has
been
ongoing
for
a
long
time.
We
are
seeing
an
additional
14
1439
units
of
density
in
exchange
for
commitment
to
provide
1020,
affordable
housing
units.
A
Is
this
arrangement
perfect?
No,
nor
was
the
bayshore
arrangement,
but
we
have
limited
tools,
as
you
all
know,
and
I
would
encourage
those
who
purport
to
be
advocates
for
housing,
put
down
the
iphone
and
stop
tweeting
attacks
on
members
of
council
and
the
federal
government
and
the
provincial
government,
because
that
has
proven
time
and
time
again
to
be
completely
ineffective.
A
We
will
see
more
affordable
housing
units
built
in
this
city
in
this
term
of
council
than
any
time
in
the
history
of
the
city
of
ottawa,
but
we
still
need
more.
I
recognize
that
and
that's
why,
on
the
survey
that
I've
sent
out
to
federal
politicians
and
candidates,
we've
asked
them:
how
are
they
going
to
continue
to
improve
partnerships
with
the
city
of
ottawa
and
every
other
municipality
in
ontario
and
canada?
A
And
what's
the
alternative
to
this,
you
know,
let's
go
back
and
some
emotions
that
were
brought
forward.
Let's
drag
this
on
another
couple
of
years,
not
see
any
action,
no
shovels
in
the
ground,
big
gab
fest,
we're
good
we're
good
at
that,
but
that
doesn't
help
the
people
of
this
community.
So
I'd
encourage
you,
those
of
you
who
advocate
for
housing
in
your
wards
and
citywide,
think
about
this
for
a
minute.
You
supported
eight
percent.
K
C
C
N
G
K
J
R
D
G
A
K
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
register
a
council
that
we
held
extensive
public
meetings
on
this
at
our
last
one.
We
had
over
86
people
and
they
were
very,
very
much
upset
by
the
height
of
the
building.
It's
double
the
height
of
any
other
building
in
the
ward,
but
in
any
of
the
buildings
nearby,
and
when
you
consider
that
that
intersection,
clyde
and
baseline
was
cited
as
a
transit
hub
in
justification
of
the
rezoning.
K
B
F
K
Well,
as
you
recall,
when
we
did
the
rezoning
of
the
for
the
walmart
at
baseline
and
clyde,
there
was
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
upset
about
the
intersection
of
baseline
and
clyde
failing
three
times
during
the
day,
and
measures
were
taken
at
the
rezoning
to
provide
geometric
changes
to
the
intersection
that
actually
worked
very
well
and
improved
the
intersection
so
to
now
suddenly
put
a
building
up.
That's
double
the
height
of
the
nearby
buildings.
F
F
N
F
The
report-
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
report
24
the
belt
heritage
subcommittee
report
number
23,
the
planning
committee
report,
47
transportation
committee
number
21,
and
the
pro
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
as
at
the
council
city
council
meeting
of
july
21st
2021.
A
F
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
mayor.
I
know
I
had
previously
read
this
out
at
the
last
council
meeting,
so
I'll
just
skip
ahead
and
therefore
be
resolved.
That
council
directs
it's
moving
on
there.
We
go.
The
council
directs
staff
from
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
to
undertake
as
part
of
the
new
zoning
bylaw
project,
a
comprehensive
review.
A
As
you
know,
the
city
manager
has
instituted
a
policy
with
respect
to
mandatory
vaccine
requirements
for
our
employees,
but
he
doesn't
have
the
authority
to
direct
members
of
council
because
we're
considered
independent
of
the
public
service.
So
this
requires
us
to
follow
the
same
rules
and
regulations
as
our
employees
and
I'd
ask
for
your
support
and
I
thank
councillor
egg
lai
and
the
board
of
health
for
their
endorsement
on
the
motion.
A
The
next
motion
requires
suspension.
Rules
is
also
by
myself,
centered
by
councillor
english,
with
respect
to
council
appointed
citizen
volunteers
on
committees
and
boards
on
suspension,
carrie
ann.
As
indicated,
we
have
a
number
of
people
who
sit
on
boards
and
agencies,
whether
it's
the
transit
commission,
the
ottawa
board
of
health,
public
library
board
and
so
on,
and
to
treat
those
individuals
the
same
as
the
rest
of
our
employees
on
the
motion
carry.
K
A
Okay,
next
is
a
motion
by
councillor
egg
license
by
councillor
gower,
with
respect
to
an
interim
control
by
law
for
the
study
of
lands
along
the
woodruff
corridor,
lrt,
obviously
being
a
interim
control.
Bylaw,
there's
a
time
sensitivity
so
on
suspension
carried
councillor
egg
life.
I'd
like
to
introduce
your
motion.
H
H
City
staff
in
the
planning
department
asked
for
an
opportunity
to
study
these
lands,
and-
and
that
is
why
we
put
the
bio
on
in
the
first
place,
that
study
still
continues
to
determine
uses
going
forward
and
staff
needs
more
time
to
finish.
That
study
so
they're
asking
for
that
time
and
this
motion
will
will
extend
the
bylaw
and
and
allow
them
the
time
to
finish
up
all
their
study
work.
So
I
appreciate
your
support
on
this.
G
G
B
Mr
mayor,
no
we
we
looked
at
that
issue
last
year
when
the
original
bilo
was
brought
forward,
and
we
feel
this
this
area,
it's
an
isolated
planning
issue
and
as
councillor
eglide
properly
indicated,
we
the
law
says
we
only
have
one
year
and
council
needs
to
renew
it.
If
we
go
beyond
the
one
year,
we
do
need
a
little
bit
more
time
beyond
the
one
year.
G
A
A
As
you
know,
we
have
a
commemorative
plaque
tree
program,
a
command
retreat
program.
The
jamaican
ottawa
community
association
celebrated
its
50th
anniversary
a
few
years
ago,
and
they
wanted
to
put
a
commemorative
tree
in
strathcona
park,
which
they
did
now
they
like
to
have
a
plaque
on
it.
The
plaque
traditionally
is
in
memory
of
someone,
and
this
is
outside
those
rules,
so
staff
inform
me
that
we
need
council
approval
to
allow
the
jamaican
ottawa
community
association
to
install
their
plaque
at
their
cost.
A
K
That
the
bylaws
listed
on
the
agenda
under
motion
to
introduce
bylaws
three
readings
be
read
and
passed
and
that
the
following
bylaw
be
read
and
passed
in
accordance
with
the
motion
approved
at
today's
meeting.
A
bylaw
of
the
city
of
ottawa
to
amend
bylaw
number
2020
310,
entitled
a
bylaw
of
the
city
of
ottawa
to
establish
interim
control
for
lands
along
the
woodruff
corridor,
lrt
to
extend
the
period
of
the
interim
control
for
one
year.