►
From YouTube: City Council - 9 February 2022
Description
City Council - 9 February 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
B
G
H
E
G
D
G
That
the
Deferred
report
from
planning
committee
entitled
official
plan
and
Zoning
bylaw
amendments,
one
in
19th
through
Johnny
McDonald,
Parkway,
Agriculture,
Rural,
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
committee
report,
28
finance
and
economic
development
committee
report,
34
planning
committee
report,
55
Transportation
committee
report
25
in
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act,
explanations
required
at
city,
council,
meeting
of
January
26th
2022
be
received
and
considered
and
that
the
rules
of
procedure
be
suspended
to
receive
and
consider
the
build.
Heritage
subcommittee
24.
K
I'm
just
wondering
mayor,
we
have
an
evolving
situation
with
the
occupation
in
Ottawa
and
we
have
new
information
today
about
apparently
new
encampments
being
set
up
in
further
other
Awards
south
of
Carlton
University
River
Ward
I'm
wondering.
Are
we
having
an
update
today
on
the
occupation
in
Ottawa
at
all,
because
I
know
we
had
an
update
on
Monday,
but
it's
two
days
in
advance.
This
is
a
daily
updating
occurrence.
The
most
important
thing
happening
in
the
city
and
I
hope
that
we
can
talk
about
it
today.
K
D
M
Mr
Merrick
and
give
a
verbal
update
on
the
things
that
we're
aware
of
from
the
overnight
briefing
but
I'm
not
current
on
the
entire
situation.
We
need
the
police
here
to
be
able
to
do
that
because
it's
active
and
fluid.
So
my
information
is
from
I
have
an
update
from
overnight
last
night.
Briefly,
it
says
kimayot,
but
we
need
police
and
we'll
see
if
we
can
get
them.
If
the
motion
passes.
Okay,.
D
Well,
let's,
let's
try
our
best
to
get
someone
from
the
police
if
possible,
we
don't
want
to
take
them
away
from
their
pressing
duties.
So
if
that's
agreeable
councilman
McKinney,
we
don't
need
a
motion.
We
just
direct
our
city
manager
to
give
us
an
update.
Great
thanks.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Next
is
post
moments
and
deferrals
we'll
come
back
to
that,
because
there
are
emotions
that
are
attached
to
that
onto
the
consent
agenda
committee
reports,
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
committee
report
number
28
motion
representation
on
conservation,
Authority
boards.
D
D
A
planning
committee,
a
report,
number
55
official
plan
and
Sony
by
law,
Amendment
641,
Rito
Street;
there's
a
motion
on
that.
So
we'll
come
back
to
that
item.
Six
zoning
bylaw
amendments,
385,
Sussex,
Drive
modifications,
Sussex,
hold
hold
Transportation
committee
report,
number
25,
proponential
events
saying
to
commit
data,
transport,
strategic
Road,
Safety,
Action,
Plan
annual
report
received
and
carried
item;
eight
motion,
road
closure,
Fire
and
Ice
installation
carried
carried.
D
I
Sorry
Mr
Mayor
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
small
comment
on
this:
the
urgency
okay
go
ahead.
I
just
want
to
thank
City
staff,
particularly
in
building
code
and
and
planning
for
working
diligently
with
with
the
within
the
city,
but
also
with
the
community,
to
do
the
proper
analysis
that
led
to
the
emergency
report,
I'm
happy
that
staff
did
reaffirm
once
again
that
this
is
not
a
precedent.
Setting
there's
unique
set
of
circumstances
of
a
Heritage
building
that
had
a
recent
fire.
D
D
N
N
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
as
a
council
approved
the
following
one:
an
amendment
to
the
official
plan
volume,
one
for
one
and
119's
sjm
Parkway
to
redesignate
approximately
2.7
hectares
land
from
major
open
space
to
General
urban
area,
as
detailed
in
document
two
to
an
amendment
to
the
official
plan
volume,
2A,
Scott
Street
secondary
plan
for
1
and
19
Sir
Johnny
McDonald
Parkway
to
redesignate
approximately
2.7
hectares
of
land
from
open
space
existing
to
a
new
designation
institutional
embassies.
As
detailed
in
doctor
two
whoever's
showing
screen.
N
N
To
minor
institutional
Sub
Zone
a
exception
Triplex
or
Forex,
holding
Zone
into
rezone,
approximately
one
hectare's
land
from
open
space,
subzone,
l,
Etc
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
third
resolution
or
a
force.
Oh,
is
there
sorry
there
is
direct
staff
to
incorporate
the
amendment
to
the
official
plan
volumes.
One
and
two
is
detailed
in
document
two
and
schedule
B2
in
our
Urban
transect
of
the
new
official
plan
and
the
Scott
Street
secondary
plan
is
part
of
the
new
official
plan
and
then
there
is
a
second
motion
that
changes
some
languages.
N
Maybe
I
will
just
go
straight
to
the
resolution.
Please
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
council
approved
the
following
that
the
following
texts
be
added
to
the
amendment
to
the
Scott
Street
secondary
plan
under
the
heading
public
realm
and
Mobility.
Immediately,
following
the
words
the
city
may
require
enhanced
streetscape
measures
along
public
streets,
seven
development
May
provide
pedestrian
corridors
for
Access
between
forward
Avenue
and
the
extension
of
hinchi
or
along
other
Eastman
corridors
that
the
subsequent
numbering
with
the
the
secondary
plan,
Amendment
text
to
be
adjusted
accordingly.
N
Three
that,
with
respect
to
document
three
of
the
report,
a
the
following
text
within
the
draft
zoning
bylaw
Amendment
contained
within
document.
Three
of
the
staff
report,
be
deleted
an
amendment
to
this
bylaw
to
remove
the
holding
provision
on
a
lot
by
lot
basis
once
an
application
for
site
plan
control
under
the
planning
act
for
the
subject,
lands
is
approved
which
addresses
the
following
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
manager,
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development.
N
A
McDonald,
Parkway
and
Slidell
Street
intersection
B
that
the
text
deleted
by
3A
be
replaced
by
the
following
text.
An
amendment
to
this
bylaw
to
remove
the
holding
Zone
provision
in
parkour
and
full
is
permitted
once
an
application
for
site
plan
control
under
the
planning
act
for
the
subject
lenses
approved,
which
addresses
the
following
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
manager
of
planning,
real
estate
and
economic
development.
N
Sorry,
the
second
motion
is
intended
that
if
this
project
moves
ahead,
the
community
is
going
to
get
The
Pedestrian
infrastructure,
that
that
we
expect
to
happen
with
that.
But
colleagues,
if
I
may
take
a
moment,
I
am
asking
that
again
that
this
not
be
allowed
to
proceed
over
the
course
of
Christmas
holidays
I
staff.
N
In
the
community
spend
some
significant
time
trying
to
acquire
a
couple
of
very
interesting
Parcels
of
land
that
would
have
added
a
relatively
significantly
to
the
Parkland
inventory
in
an
area
that
is
bereft
of
green
space
and
we
were
unsuccessful,
I'm
looking
forward
to
sharing
the
lessons
of
that
with
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
But
what
I
know
from
residents
and
and
what
I
see
walking
around
is
that
we
cannot
lose
this
green
space.
Our
official
plan
calls
for
us
to
provide
Green
Space
for
rapidly
intensifying
neighborhoods
like
Mechanicsville.
N
It
would
be
inappropriate
to
allow
this
Embassy
Road
proposal
to
move
forward
for
those
who
may
not
be
familiar
with
the
file
they're
proposing
to
build
five
embassies
in
a
parcel
of
land
that
is
currently
forested.
When
you
take
a
look
at
the
heat
map
that
the
city
has
published,
you
can
see
the
the
the
the
green
effect
of
this
parcel
of
land
in
in
a
concrete
jungle.
I
am
asking
that
we
be
sensitive
to
the
climate
crisis
that
we've
declared
and
preserve
this
land
as
Green
Space.
N
O
O
Their
mandate
in,
in
my
view,
is
Green
Space
I'm,
having
a
big
struggle
over
the
last
12
years,
trying
to
get
the
NCC
to
get
on
board
where
it
will
see
their
portfolio
increase
in
Green
Space
solve
a
massive
Transit
issue
in
the
East
End
of
the
city
and
it's
time
for
the
NCC
to
start
working
with
the
city.
I
get
their
board
is
unelected,
but
certainly
there
we
want
to
send
a
strong
message
that
they
have
to
learn
to
work
with
their
city
and
work
together
collectively.
O
So
we
can
accomplish
things
and
I.
Don't
see
that
we
see
it
again
in
the
case
of
councilor
leaper,
where
he
thought
he
was
going
to
get
the
best
for
his
constituency
and
again
they're,
not
honest
Brokers.
They
haven't
delivered
friends
and
colleagues.
I
will
be
voting
strongly
against
us
today
and
I'm,
hoping
that
you
will
also
take
into
my
friend
councilor
leapers
thoughts
as
well.
Thank.
G
Florida
I
was
struck
with
the
duplicity
of
what
we
had
before
us,
an
application
where
the
community
is
fighting
for
green
space
and
yet
in
the
East
End
we've
spent
years
at
an
impasse
with
the
NCC
on
the
location
of
critical
infrastructure,
including
a
bus,
Rapid
Transit
Corridor,
with
their
resistance
hinged
on
protecting
Green
Space,
and
so
you
know,
councilor
attorney
and
I
work
together
to
defer
this
item
to
allow
for
further
negotiations
with
the
NCC
on
a
path
forward.
But
as
those
have
continued
to
fail,
I
cannot
support
this
application.
G
The
award
counselor
just
outlined
his
opposition
to
this
in
kitchissippi,
but
my
vote
today
is
with
the
intention
of
sending
a
clear
message
to
our
partners
at
the
NCC
that
as
a
city,
we
are
unable
to
meet
the
housing
density,
mobility
and
environmental
resilience.
Targets
of
our
new
official
plan
by
furthering
car
Centric
development
and
the
Healthy
Growth
of
my
community
is
under
threat.
So
this
can
not
continue.
Thank
you.
Mr
Mayor.
F
Completely
agree
with
my
Eastern
colleagues
and
with
with
councilor
leaper
as
well.
The
NCC
speaks
out
of
both
sides
of
its
mouth
when
it
comes
to
Green
Space
and
protecting
Green
Space
and
expanding
Green
Space.
What's
good
for
what's
good
for
downtown
is
is
good
for
the
suburbs
as
well
about
the
same
time,
they're
speaking
out
of
both
sides
of
their
mouth,
they
won't
come
and
sit
and
sit
down
and
speak
with
us.
F
We've
provided,
along
with
City
staff,
several
options
that
would
increase
the
ncc's
hold
on
green
space
in
the
East
End
in
exchange
for
being
able
to
increase
our
bus
rapid
transit
system
out
here,
our
residents
cannot
make
it
to
work.
We
do
not
have
rapid
transit
options
in
the
south
of
Orleans.
Development
cannot
continue
there
as
it's
completely
unsustainable.
F
At
this
point
in
time,
there
are
people
that
want
to
live
out
here,
work
and
play
out
here
in
the
East
end,
and
they
are
unable
to
do
so
because
there's
no
viable
Transit
option
for
them
to
make
it
into
work.
So
I
would
also
encourage
my
colleagues
not
to
vote
for
this.
It's
time
to
send
a
strong
message
to
the
NCC
that,
if
they're
going
to
be
good
partners
to
the
city,
that
they
have
to
come
down
to
the
table
and
speak
with
us
about
things
like
this.
Thank
you.
P
Very
much
I'll
be
voting
against
the
this
project
as
well.
I
work
with
the
NCC
all
the
time,
we're
surrounded
by
the
NCC,
and
when
the
official
plan
came
up,
my
my
residents
asked
to
to
have
a
motion
to
protect
Green
Space
around
Moody
station
and
it
seemed
redundant
because
it's
green
space
and
its
NCC.
But
you
can
understand
that
the
concern,
because
there
is
concern
that
rules
could
change
and
that
that
was
a
concern.
P
So
I
I
appreciate
that
if
we're
the
Precedence
that
it
sets
bothers
me,
it's
one
thing
if
they
were
offering
land
for
affordable
housing.
That
would
be
something
that
we
could
work
with.
But
this
is
not
what
that's
about
and
I
I
think
that
we
have
to
look
at
this
very
carefully
in
terms
of
precedent
setting,
because
we
we're
going
to
continue
to
work
with
the
NCC.
P
Q
Bradley
Estates
has
come
to
Transportation
committee
and
planning
committee
and
shown
how
the
impacts
of
their
unwillingness
have
led
to
thousands,
ten
thousand
plus
and
Peak
periods,
cars
jamming
up
their
streets.
You
know
we're
talking
about
a
good
faith
conversation
and
the
NCC
has
been
unwilling
to
do
this.
So
I
fully
support
my
Eastern
colleagues
I
support
councilor
leaper.
We
all
are
stewards
of
the
city
of
Ottawa.
Q
We
need
to
have
a
Frank
and
honest
conversation
with
the
NCC
and,
if
they're
not
willing
to
come
to
the
table,
then
we
need
to
take
a
strong
stance
to
ensure
that
they
have
that.
You
know
respectful
conversation
with
us
for
the
benefit
of
our
residents.
So
I
really
do
appreciate
councilor
Lee
for
bringing
this
forward
I
fully
support
it
and
I
look
forward
to
having
those
conversations
with
the
NCC,
even
if
it
means
that
we
have
to
strong
arm
them
to
get
them
there.
C
C
First
of
all,
counselor
leaper
made
an
excellent
job,
trying
to
protect
a
large
SWOT
of
green
spaces,
downtown
I
think
what
he
said
was
very
very
relevant.
We
have
to
be
extremely
careful
when
we're
talking
about
development.
We
have
existing
Green
Space.
We
have
to
protect
them
and
even
increase
the
area
if
possible.
C
I'll
give
you
another
example
of
what
happened
with
the
CCN
and
some
of
the
issues
we
had
when
we
talked
about
the
King
Edward
Corridor.
This
was
a
little
bit
before
I
was
elected.
So
before
2010,
when
we
had
the
end
of
king
Edward
going
towards
McDonald
carty
Bridge,
there
was
a
piece
of
land
that
was
available.
C
I
C
See
a
piece
of
land
that's
been
abandoned,
not
used
so
I
think
we
have
a
responsibility
as
a
national
capital.
We
also
have
a
local
objectives
to
respect.
We
can't
say
that
NCC
is
interfering
with
us.
We
have
to
find
some
tools
make
sure
that
we
work
with
them
to
reach
our
objectives
as
a
community.
C
We
don't
benefit
directly
from
the
construction
of
an
embassy.
Normally,
it's
fenced.
We
don't
have
access
to
the
land,
so
this
is
sometime
when
we
have
issues,
because
there's
a
disconnect
between
the
collective
interest
and
what's
going
on
at
this
dcn,
so
I
agree
with
my
colleagues.
By
rejecting
this
report,
I
think
we
have
to
have
a
good
discussion
with
the
NCC
talking
about
our
responsibilities,
especially
when
we're
talking
about
embassies
within
the
national
capital.
Thank.
R
R
D
J
Yeah,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor,
really
I
just
want
clarification,
I
understand
what
is
generally
happening
here
and
I
support.
What
counselor
Leeper
is
trying
to
do.
I
supported
everything
that
councilor
leaper
said
and
my
other
colleagues
but
technically
for
this
motion
and
counselor
leaver.
Maybe
you
can
just
clarify
when
you
wrap
up.
You
want
us
to
amend
a
previous
motion
but
in
fact
there's
no
support
for
the
whole
motion.
J
The
motion
as
a
whole,
so
your
amendments
are
just
trying
to
make
this
better,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
none
of
us
support
the
whole
motion.
It's
from
what
I'm
hearing
here
is
that
correct?
Because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
don't
want
to
vote
the
wrong
way
and
then
they'll
say
well
she's
new.
We
don't
want
that
so
I
just
want
clearly
what
is
it
that
we're
doing
here?
We're
voting?
We
support
councilor
leaper
from
what
I'm
hearing,
but
at
the
end,
there'll
be
another
motion.
N
So
I'm
obviously
hearing
the
the
strong
opposition
to
this
proposal
on
the
part
of
my
colleagues,
for
which
I'm
grateful,
but
we
haven't
voted
yet
on
the
the
mean
motion.
I
am
asking
people
to
vote
in
favor
of
the
Amendments
so
that
if
this
does
move
ahead,
it's
a
better
proposal
but
I
am
looking
forward
based
on
the
conversation
thus
far
to
seeing
the
the
overall
proposal,
even
as
amended
rejected.
Thank
you
mayor.
G
K
K
You
know,
I,
certainly
understand
the
you
know
the
challenges,
the
frustrations
when
two
sides
can't
seem
to
work
together
and
you
might
try
to
compromise,
retain
those
two
sides
and
how
frustrating
it
could
be
when
that
compromise
doesn't
work.
That
certainly
happens
often
and
it
could
be.
It
can
be
certainly
a
challenge,
but
committee
debated
this
file
as
a
planning
file,
which
is
what
it
is.
K
So
if
you
want
to
vote
against
this
because
you
want
an
infrastructure
file
somewhere
else
in
the
city-
and
you
feel
this
is
the
way
to
get
it-
the
Ontario
land
tribunal
is
going
to
disagree
with
you,
because
there
is
no
such
thing
as
that
type
of
Leverage
and
I.
Don't
think
that
we
want
to
start
evaluating
planning
files
based
on
other
positions.
We
have
on
other
files
in
the
city,
so
I
I
completely
see
where
this
is
going.
K
K
D
O
Just
very
quickly
and
Mr
Mayor
I
I
just
want
based
on
what
we
just
heard
from
councilman.
What's
what's
bothering
me
about
this
particular
matter
and
and
and
I?
Think
it's
what's
bothering
Council
leaper
as
well
is
in
good
faith.
He
sat
down
tried
to
negotiate
a
way
through
thought
that
he
had
a
deal.
It
sounds
like
the
rug
was
pulled
out
at
the
last
minute
on
him
and
his
community
so
and
he
was
negotiating
on
planning
principles
and
around
the
planning
applications.
That's
why
I'm
voting
against
this
particular
application?
O
G
H
Q
Mr
Mayor,
it
can
be
very
difficult
to
make
a
determination
as
to
what
the
tribunal
is
is
going
to
assess
in
the
event
of
an
appeal
on
this
on
this
matter.
I've
heard
a
myriad
of
of
reasons
so
far
this
morning,
and
so
certainly
it
would
depend
on
which
rationale
Council
would
like
to
bring
forward
in
terms
of
the
refusal
of
this
matter.
If
that
is
indeed
the
direction
that
this
council
is
going.
T
Thank
you
very
much,
Mr
Mayor,
as
a
counselor
who
you
know,
I'll
just
speak
for
an
on
behalf
of
residents
here,
where
the
frustration
I
think
is
coming
in
for
a
lot
of
people
when
they
look
at
this
file.
Is
that,
yes,
we
have
several
levels
of
government
and
several
levels
of
authority
here
in
the
city.
But
as
a
city
we
just
passed
an
official
plan
and
the
official
plan
is
pretty
clear.
T
We
want
to
protect
Green,
Space
and
I
think
that
the
NCC
as
a
as
a
body
should
also
respect
that
here
in
the
city
of
Ottawa,
and
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
a
planning
committee
can
say:
yes,
we
we
understand
this
and
pass
it
as
as
councilor
moffatt
has
said,
but
for
the
residents
of
the
area
and
for
the
area
counselor,
who
know
this
area
best,
we
need
to
reflect
those
voices
and
to
have
the
MCC
and
I
love.
Counselor
kitsa
we're
a
duplicitous
to
ask
for
that.
T
The
embassies
have
green
space
when
we
are
requiring
everybody
else
in
the
city
to
move
into
dance
areas
so
that
they
could
take
advantage
of
Transit
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
So
I'd
just
like
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
residents
that
say
taking
away.
Green
Space
for
embassies
sends
exactly
the
wrong
signal
and
again,
when
I
hear
what
what
would
the
Ontario
land
tribunal
do?
T
If
we
decide
to
reject
this
file,
you
know,
let's
reject
it
and
see,
and
you
know
just
to
back
down
because
there
is
a
threat
that
we
could
be.
We
could
lose
always
sends
the
wrong
signal.
Let's
tackle
this
file,
vote
it
down
and
then
defend
it
as
as
well
as
we
possibly
can,
but
that's
just
not
roll
over,
because
you
could
possibly
lose
at
the
land
tribe.
You
know
that's
my
two
cents.
Thank
you.
R
R
Can
we
talk
about
what
would
be
a
good
fit
to
make
this
work,
but
not
at
this
location,
and
so
I
I
don't
want
if
this
is
defeated
today,
the
NCC
to
say
well
we're
just
going
to
go
to
the
tribunal,
we're
going
to
get
this
done,
because
we
gave
you
a
courtesy
to
begin
with.
I
voted
against
this
at
planning
committee.
I
will
vote
against
it
again
today
and
I
do
believe.
R
The
Amendments
before
us
are
right
and
we'll
be
supporting
those,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
as
counselor
tyranny
and
others,
certainly
myself
and
River
Ward.
The
NCC
does
a
lot
of
good
in
the
national
capital
commission,
but
there
are
certainly
a
long
list
of
projects
where
communication
and
cooperation
could
be
much
much
better.
Thank
you
mayor.
N
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
I
will
keep
it
very
brief
and
I've
heard
the
the
clear
opposition
to
this
proposal
for
from
counselors.
Our
our
official
plan
is
clear
when
we
and
I
agree
with
councilor
Brockington
I
hope
we
don't
find
ourselves
in
front
of
the
Ontario
land
tribunal,
but
our
official
plan
speaks
to
in
several
places
retaining
major
public
space
enhancing
tree
cover
protecting
existing
tree
canopy,
responding
to
climate
change.
N
You
can
feel
very
comfortable
rejecting
this
application
in
a
neighborhood
like
Mechanicsville,
that
is
being
so
rapidly
intensifying.
It
is
critical
that
we
adhere
to
the
principles
of
the
existing
official
plan
and
certainly
to
the
ones
that
are
even
more
aggressive
in
the
official
plan
that
is
yet
to
be
approved
by
the
province.
Thank
you
very
much,
colleagues
for
the
clear
opposition
of
The
Proposal
that
I'm
hearing
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
to
the
results
of
this
vote.
Q
Q
Mr
Mayor
I
am
presently
working
on
that
right
now.
Certainly,
I
am
working
with
clerks
and
planning
staff
to
put
together
the
motion,
and
we
will
be
reaching
out
to
councilor
lieber's
office
with
respect
to
the
motion
that
he
had
put
forward
to
have
those
that
technical
information
included
in
the
planning
rationale.
D
D
G
D
F
C
G
G
I
N
D
D
Okay,
so
that
is
defeated
and
we'll
wait
for
the
the
planning
rationale
before
the
end
of
the
meeting.
Our
next
item
that
was
held
is
item
four,
the
waiver
of
real
property
policy
and
transfer
of
previously
declared
Surplus
Land
part
of
three
three
eight,
oh
jockville,
Road
councilor
harder
has
a
motion
seconded
by
councilor
moffatt.
D
G
You
Mr,
Mayor
and
I
hope
that
you
all
notice
this
in
their
package
last
night,
whereas
a
significant
number
of
community
concerns
have
been
raised
following
the
consideration
of
the
report
at
the
February
09
22
2022,
meeting
of
the
finance
and
economic
development
committee,
whereas
the
ward
counselor
would
like
the
opportunity
to
share
additional
information
with
the
community
prior
to
being
heard
at
Council,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
council
deferred
this
report
to
the
February
23rd
meeting
of
council
and
just
because
I
have
the
opportunity
to
tell
you.
G
I
have
been
in
discussion
with
Donna
gray
and
with
Steve
Willis
and
their
teams
we're
going
to
hold
a
meeting
next
week,
an
information
session
because
most
of
these
people,
in
fact,
all
of
the
people
that
have
written
in
found
out
about
the
the
program
that
allowed
the
money
to
be
funding.
This
property
in
Bar
Haven
through
a
CTB
six
o'clock
news,
and
they
have
a
lot
of
questions.
G
I
D
I
I
Therefore,
it
resolved
that
councilman
motion
number
PL,
the
numbers
with
respect
to
staff
report,
that's
in
front
of
us
to
revise
the
proposed
new
recommendation
1e
as
the
following.
So
one
e
that
the
implementation
official
plan,
Amendment
and
Zoning
bylaw
amends,
do
not
proceed
to
council
until
until
the
memorandum
of
understanding
is
executed
by
the
applicant
and
the
memorandum
of
understanding
contains
the
following.
I
The
applicant
shall
offer
current
tenants
the
opportunity
first
right
of
refusal
at
the
market
rent
to
return
to
the
new
building
in
a
unit
of
some
similar
sizes
as
the
one
they
vacated
and
C
subsidize
the
rent
differential
of
an
alternative
rental
accommodation
in
another
building
in
a
unit
of
comparable
size
and
price
price
point
for
the
period
of
three
years.
For
all
current
tenants
with
a
tenure
of
the
building
over
five
years,
all
other
tenants
shall
receive
a
one-year
subsidy.
I
So
I
I
want
to
thank
my
colleagues,
the
applicant
and
the
city.
It
was
it's
important
that
we,
we
really
Advance
these
sorts
of
negotiations,
and
it's
been
a
number
of
examples
recently
and
I
hope
that
it
sends
a
signal
of
of
where
we're
heading
in
terms
of
community
in
terms
of
of
city
and
Council.
I
I
I
as
a
local
counselor
will
not
be
supporting
the
application.
So
I
invite
you
to
vote
for
the
motion,
but
then
I
won't
be
supporting
the
report.
As
you
know,
there's
been
a
recent
Uptown
CDP
and
there's
a
number
of
criteria
that
identify
how
the
heights
will
be
granted
and
one
of
the
key
criterias
here
is
two
frontages
which
aren't
met
for
the
additional
Heights,
so
I'm
I'm
I'm
eyes
open
that
it
did
pass
through
committee,
but
I
did
want
to
explain
my
dissent.
Thank
you.
Mr
Mayor.
J
The
worst
one
certainly
was
so
interesting
and
so
good
for
the
community
and
I
think
it
shows
people
that
you
know
when
you,
when
we
sometimes
get
criticisms
that
we
don't
care
or
something
to
that
effect
that
we
do
and
and
I
really
think.
It
also
sends
a
message
to
other
developers
going
forward
that
this
is
what
they
need
to
think
about
when
they
want
to
try
to
relocate
or
create
a
Dem
eviction
or
whatever
you
know.
J
K
Very
much
mayor
I
also
want
to
just
thank
councilor
Fleury
for
the
the
work
on
this
for
the
motion.
It's
it's
obviously
difficult
in
a
time
when
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
levers.
Hopefully
those
levers
come,
but
the
the
amendment
you're
bringing
I
think
is
important
on
the
overall
motion.
I'll
likely
vote
against,
but
I'll
vote
for
your
emotion
and
I
agree
with
councilor
Curry.
It
is.
K
This
is
an
important
discussion
and
we
got
to
get
to
a
better
place
than
we
are
now
and
sometimes
in
these
discussions.
It
is
important
to
show
some
opposition
at
planning
committee
and
Council
to
get
better
outcomes
so
that
we
we
pressure
folks
to
come
to
a
conclusion
so
that
the
public
benefits
at
large
and
not
just
the
people
putting
up
that
building
so
really
appreciate
councilor
Fleury
to
come
back
here
and
the
extra
that
you
were
able
to
get
out
of
this
with
staff
in
this
motion.
So
thank
you.
D
B
B
R
E
A
D
I
S
To
answer
all
the
clarification
questions
I
got
there
is,
it
is
the
gig
and
parasite
and
the
Archdiocese
back
then
demolished
some
Heritage
buildings
with
the
agreement
of
the
city
to
have
a
temporary
parking
lot.
We
are
20
years
later
now,
we're
temporary
has
become
permanent
and
in
the
past
three
years,
they're
not
confirmed
in
Conformity
with
the
zoning
which
forced
them
to
ask
for
another
extension.
S
So
I
appreciate
the
motion
of
colleague
Brockington
to
reduce
the
time,
but
I'd
like
us
to
go
further
I'd
like
us
to
refuse
the
report
to
reject
it,
for
the
simple
reason
that
it
is
not
temporary.
I
know
that
we
went
through
the
covid,
we're
very
stressed,
but
the
city
is
a
very
important
partner
that
could
free
up
that
site.
We
have
a
parking
Reserve
fund
with
over
20
million
dollars.
We
have
active
Partners
to
redevelop
this
site
with
underground
parking,
so
I'm
extremely
disappointed
in
the
Archdiocese.
S
With
the
past,
Bishop
Pendergast
had
developed
a
plan
that
was
launching
a
Redevelopment
plan,
but
what
we
learned
now
through
this
submission
that
all
these
efforts
in
the
past
few
years
of
the
city
of
the
community
and
the
past
Bishop
has
completely
got
back
to
the
starting
point.
So
we
have
to
emphasize
how
important
it
is
to
to
keep
up
the
word.
The
that
was
made.
S
The
promises
made
to
the
city
so
I
urge
you
not
to
allow
a
temporary
extension
to
the
arcsiases,
because
fast
I
know
that
some
people
are
kind
of
nervous
because
of
the
time
we're
living
in,
but
there's
no
parking
Revenue
coming
from
there,
but
I'm
telling
you.
The
city,
is
part
of
the
solution.
Here
we
have
a
reserve
account
for
this
that
we
could
use
with
the
market
public
sites
of
the
bywar
market.
It's
an
ideal
site
right
next
to
the
market,
so
the
excuse
of
not
having
the
money
is
no
good.
S
In
this
case,
the
city
has
the
money
and
is
ready
to
conclude
a
partnership
with
The
Arc
diocese,
and
we
have
to
put
an
end
to
this
extension
that
are
apparently
temporary,
but
that
have
been
in
place
for
23
years.
So
I
recommend
that
you
support
me
by
rejecting
this
request
for
a
temporary
extension.
Thank
you.
D
G
Appreciate
councilor
brockington's
motion
from
planning
committee
that
reduces
the
extension
from
three
to
two.
The
reality
is
no
matter
what
we
decide
today.
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
chance.
Anything
gets
developed
here
in
the
next
two
years
and
anything
we
do
today,
you
know,
does
not
discourage
or
encourage
I.
G
Think
the
emotion
from
councilor
Fleury
at
the
committee
in
terms
of
setting
up
a
working
group,
a
committee
to
support
the
hot
at
the
the
church
is,
is
reasonable
and
helps
us
get
towards
a
solution
and
I'm
sympathetic
as
well
to
the
difficulty
that
every
church
and
religious
organization
has
had
in
Ottawa
over
the
last
two
years
during
the
pandemic.
I
think
that's
definitely
a
factor
in
in
my
decision
making
here.
G
I
don't
want
to
be
back
in
two
years,
granting
extension
or
extension
again
after
that,
but
I
think
we
we
can
support
the
church.
Give
them
resources
from
the
city
help
them
work
with
the
community
to
find
a
reasonable
solution
in
the
next
two
years,
and
hopefully,
two
years
from
now
the
next
term,
with
Council
we're.
We
have
a
good
solution
in
front
of
us
that
sees
Redevelopment
on
that
lot.
Thank
you.
A
C
J
So
the
discussion
at
planning
committee,
I
too
councilor
Fleury
I,
was
not
impressed
with
their
General
plan.
I
mean
I.
Think
one
of
the
comments
was
well.
We
had
thought
about
creating
a
home
for
priests
that
retired
priests,
but
we
we
need
to
save
money
for
it
and
I
thought.
That's
not
a
good
enough
plan
when
this
is
a
part
of
our
city.
That
you
know
is
is
something
that
everyone
really
has
interest
in
and
could
be
so
much
better.
J
The
challenge
I
have
is,
if
we
don't
vote
for
this
extension,
it
doesn't
necessarily
give
them
any
incentive
to
work
with
us.
I
mean
that's
the
problem.
I
they
I
mean
at
one
point
in
the
meeting
the
person.
That's
now
their
CEO
said
no
I'm,
not
that
interested
in
working
with
the
community,
because
we
don't
have
any
money.
We
haven't
had
time
to
plan
and
so
I
sort
of
thought.
Well
if
they
have
in
two
years
to
counselor
gowers
point
in
two
years.
What
will
be
different
if
we
block
this?
J
I
think
he
said
something
like
that,
which
is
not
enough
to
do
anything
but
I
mean
I
felt
that
the
motion,
the
amendment
allowed
for
at
least
the
concept
of
a
working
group
I
think
if
we
just
vote
against
it
entirely
then
we'll
have
nothing
so
I
mean
that's
the
challenge
I'm
having
here,
because
I
don't
agree
with
what
they
want
to
do
and
I
think
there
should
be
something
really
fun
and
interesting
done.
But
I
don't
know
if
the
solution
is
just
to
vote
against
this
right.
R
I
think
what
we
have
before
us
today
is
I
I.
Think
the
right
balance.
It's
not
the
solution.
They're
temporary
parking
extension
expired
actually
in
2018.
It
lapsed
for
quite
a
while
and
they're
they're
before
us
now.
I
think
extending
it
three
years
sent
the
wrong
message,
because
we
haven't
seen
forward
progress
and
I.
Think
councilor
flurries
motion
about
a
working
group
gets
us
going
talking.
What
do
we
want
to
see
for
the
site?
What's
realistic?
R
How
long
is
it
going
to
take
get
something
going
and,
in
the
meantime,
we're
not
going
to
give
you
a
three-year
extension?
We
are
going
to
give
you
an
extension,
because
this
is
either
going
to
be
used
as
a
parking
lot
that
generates
revenue
or
it's
going
to
be
a
parking
lot
that
doesn't
generate
revenue
and
so
I
as
I
said
at
committee.
R
Don't
want
to
financially
hurt
the
church,
allow
them
to
accrue
these
revenues,
but
my
expectation
is
that
when
they
come
back
through
the
good
work
of
the
local
counselor
and
his
community
and
the
church,
there
will
be
forward
progress.
That's
what
I
want
to
see
instead
of
what's
been
a
stagnant
file
for
quite
some
time
they
took
down
Heritage
buildings
quite
a
while
ago
decades
ago,
from
what
I
understand
and
really
the
site
has
been
what
it
is
now
a
parking
lot.
R
J
G
E
I
N
B
D
C
Report
from
the
planning
committee
entitled
efficient
plan
and
Zoning
by
amendments,
one
in
19,
surgeon
and
McDonald
Parkway
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affair
committee
report,
28
built
a
Heritage
subcommittee
report,
24
fedco
report,
34
planning
committee
report,
55
Transportation
committee
report
25,
and
a
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
in
Britain's
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
January
26
2022
be
receive
an
amended
adopted
as
amended.
D
D
L
So
be
it
resolved
that
the
dean's
King
motion
regarding
Bill
21
be
deferred
until
the
first
council
meeting
after
the
state
of
emergency
has
ended.
Mr
Mayor
I
really
think
that
this
motion
deserves
councils
full
and
undivided
attention
and
I
recognize
that
we're
in
a
state
of
emergency
and
as
such,
I'm
just
asking
Council
to
defer
it
until
the
state
of
emergency
has
has
passed.
E
E
D
F
Despite
many
acts
of
extreme
bravery
by
Canadian
Forces,
there
was
not
one
single
Victoria
Cross
Canadian
Victoria
Cross
awarded
to
a
member
of
the
Kane
Armed
Forces,
despite
the
fact
that
many
of
our
allies
did
receive
a
Victoria
Cross.
This
citation
for
the
star
of
military
Valor
reads
as
a
perfect
example
of
what
should
be
considered
for
a
Victoria
Cross.
The
Ottawa
veterans
task
force
supports
this
and
I'm
asking
for
support
from
my
counsel
from
my
Council
colleagues
as
well
for
this
motion.
D
Great.
Thank
you.
Any
questions
or
comments.
Excuse
me
on
the
motion
carried
okay
Eric.
Thank
you
thanks,
councilor
from
kits
the
next
motion
is
moved
by
myself
saying
about
counselor
Kitts
recognizing
a
former
Ottawa
resident,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
name
Ryan
Reynolds
Way
be
added
to
the
building
code,
Services
list
of
reserved
street
names
to
be
used
in
the
new
cassette
development
being
constructed
by
cave
and
communities
at
the
corner
of
Mayor,
blue
Road
and
Brian
Coburn
Boulevard
in
ward
19.
D
R
R
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
Council
one
requests
that
the
NCC
review
its
authorities
under
Section,
12.1
and
12.3.
If
the
national
capital
act
to
assess
whether
it
can
require
the
airport
authority
to
pause,
any
removal
of
trees
and
prior
to
approval
of
a
new
plan
for
the
Hunt
Club
Frontage
by
the
commission,
that
would
retain
more
trees
and
connectivity
to
the
remaining
Forest.
R
To
request
that
a
delegation
of
counsel
comprised
of
the
mayor
or
his
designate.
One
of
the
co-chairs
of
the
planning
committee
and
Ward
counselors
Deans
in
Brockington,
meet
with
the
city's
nominees
to
the
board
of
the
airport
authority
to
express
council's
concern
with
proceeding
with
tree
cutting
before
further
negotiations
on
the
future
of
the
Red
Pine
Forester
completed
and
three
authorize.
The
general
manager
planning
real
estate
and
economic
development
and
his
designates
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
a
land,
Swap
and
report
back
to
Council
on
their
findings.
D
G
N
E
Q
Whereas
Council
approved
the
brownfields
grant
program,
application
for
180,
Metcalf
Street
on
April,
14
2021
and
the
recommendations
is
approved
by
Council
incorrectly
listed
the
owner
of
the
subject
site
as
jadco
Inc
and
where
Jaco
Inc
is
the
construction
manager
for
the
project.
But
the
legal
owner
of
the
subject
site
is
1070,
1572,
Canada
Inc
and
a
numbered
company
Canada
Inc
jadco
Corporation,
whereas
the
Brownfield
Redevelopment
Grant
agreement
for
the
subject
site
has
not
yet
been
executed
and
is
pending.
Council's
consideration
of
an
amendment
to
the
report
previously
adopted,
therefore
be
resolved.
Q
The
council
approved
the
amended
recommendations
below
as
a
replacement
to
those
approved
as
part
of
report
which
have
been
corrected,
where
underlying
to
reflect
the
ownership
of
the
property
approve.
The
Brownfield
Grant
Rehabilitation
Grant
application
submitted
by
number
company
company
owner
of
the
property
sure
we
can
all
see
this
Improvement
plan
program
not
to
exceed
a
total
of
754
924,
for
which
the
grant
payment
period
will
be
phased
over
a
maximum
of
10
years
of
development,
subject
to
the
establishment
of
in
concordance
with
the.
Q
D
D
N
Yes
and
thank
you
to
everyone,
who's
been
working
quickly
behind
the
scenes
on
this,
whereas
the
recommendation
to
approve
an
amendment
to
the
official
plan
and
Zoning
bylaw
to
permit
development
of
a
diplomatic
Precinct
was
lost
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
February
9
2022,
whereas
the
planning
act
process
provides
for
the
formal
refusal
of
an
item
together
with
the
reasons
for
refusal
and
whereas
preserving
the
maximum
amount
of
Green
Space
will
help
mitigate
the
climate
and
storm
water
effects
of
this
development.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
Council
approved
that
one.
N
B
connectivity
between
the
development
and
the
neighborhood
area
and
Community
has
not
been
appropriately
established
and
see
Landscaping
which
buffers
the
area
has
not
been
maximized
and
needs
to
be
reassessed
to
mitigate
impacts
to
the
community,
D
sidewalk
and
transportation
infrastructure.
Providing
passage
from
the
community
due
to
the
Diplomatic
Precinct
has
not
been
adequately
implemented.
G
Thank
you
very
much
and
Madam
Deputy
clerk.
If
you
could
yeah
I,
didn't
get
it
so
if
you
could
put
it
up
that
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
committee
report
28
built
Heritage
subcommittee
report,
24
finance
and
economic
development
committee
report,
34
planning
committee
report,
55
Transportation
committee
report
25
and
the
report
of
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council,
meeting
of
January
26
2022,
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended.
G
C
C
M
Actually
Mr
Mayor
I'm,
not
I,
haven't
confirmed
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
to
confirm
Chief
slowly.
In
fact,
police
just
for
council's
benefit
did
re
inquire
yesterday
afternoon
with
the
clerk,
if
they
would
be
required
to
counsel,
and
they
were
told
no,
because
there
were
no
agenda
items,
but
we
did
confirm
deputy
chief
Bell
to
come
to
the
media
availability
after
Council.
M
They
are
all
in
operational
planning
meetings
this
morning
with
other
police
agencies,
and
so
the
chief
has
not
been
able
to
step
out
or
any
other
Deputy,
so
we
don't
have
them
available
for
this.
This
part
of
the
agenda,
so
we'll
only
have
Steve
Bell.
After
for
the
media
availability
myself
and
Kim
mayad
can
give
a
limited
briefing
in
terms
of
what
we
know,
but
we
won't
be
able
to
answer
all
the
questions,
obviously,
that
you
may
have
that
really
relate
to
police
operations.
L
D
O
You
Mr
Mayor.
What
I
understood
that
took
place
earlier
at
the
council
was
the
fact
that
Council
unanimously
accepted
to
add
to
the
agenda
item
an
update
from
the
city
manager
with
regards
to
the
truckers
demonstration
in
doing
so
than
any
motions.
Do
not
require
three
quarters
to
waive
the
rules
to
get
on,
because
that
item
is
now
before
council
with
the
pending
update
of
the
city
manager.
O
L
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
read
it
out:
it's
it's
not
complicated
where-
and
this
is
moved
by
myself
seconded
by
Council
Brockington,
whereas
an
occupation
continues
to
occur
in
the
city
of
Ottawa,
whereas
an
emergency
has
been
called
in
the
city
of
Ottawa
and
whereas
new
encampments
have
been
identified
in
River,
Ward
and
capital
Ward
and
whereas
the
situation
is
escalating
and
hands
on
all
that
need
to
be
focused
on
this
issue,
be
it
resolved
that
all
committees
be
canceled
until
the
18th
of
February
2022.
Of
course,.
O
Well,
thank
you.
Mr
Mary,
yes,
I
had
an
opportunity
to
look
at
the
the
motion
that
is
before
you.
This
morning
there
was
a
motion
and
a
particular
resolution
that
Council
addressed
its
last
meeting
on
Monday,
a
special
meeting
that
motion
lost
10
to
14..
One
of
the
resolutions
in
that
motion
said
and
I'll
read
it
Mr
Mayor
that
meetings
of
standing
committee
subcommittee
and
advisory
committee
meetings
for
the
week
of
February,
11
7
to
11
be
canceled,
including
planning
committee
on
February
10th
and
the
French
language
Services
advisory
committee
on
February
10th.
O
D
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
So
we'll
deal
with
it
after
we
go
through
the
list
of
speakers,
councilor,
McKinney
and
Mr
catalakis
I
realize
we
put
you
in
a
awkward
situation
because
you
don't
have
the
most
up-to-date
information
and
the
senior
leadership
of
the
police
are
obviously
preoccupied,
so
maybe
give
us
as
much
information
as
you
can
and
we'll
start
with
councilor
Brockington
with
the
questions.
M
M
B
M
Sorry
about
that,
so
Randy
Hillier
is
going
there,
so
that's
happening
today,
there's
supposed
to
be
a
candlelight
vigil
at
at
4
30,
apparently
on
on
Parliament
Hill,
in
support
of
those
injured
by
the
vaccine.
So
that's
kind
of
the
movement
that's
happening
there
from
the
from
yesterday,
the
the
Police
Service
reported
no
basically
middle
to
no
demonstrators
on
the
hill.
Parliament
sat
with
no
issues.
M
The
bylaw
has
been
embedded
with
police
and
they've,
been
patrolling
with
their
quick
response
teams
through
the
neighborhoods
and
in
the
Red
Zone
issuing
issuing
tickets
and
came
out
May
have
more
information
about
that.
There
was
an
encompetent
Metcalf,
Med
Capital
that
was
dismantled
without
any
issues
and
Parliament
is
sitting
again
today,
I
believe
at
two
o'clock.
M
There
were
no
events
to
report
overnight
of
significance
other
than
there
was
a
flood
in
the
East
block
apartment
which
the
fire
service
had
to
get
in
through
the
emergency
lanes
to
deal
with
the
house
facility
today
at
two
o'clock,
there's
no
change
in
the
police
posture
at
this
time,
bylaws
again
back
up
with
Ops
enforcing
bylaws
and
Highway
Traffic.
That
and
other
issues.
M
M
To
give
us
a
up-to-date,
up-to-date
number,
the
from
overnight
the
there
was
some
discussion
that
OPP
possibly
identified
identified
a
convoy
in
the
East
End
that
apparently
is
remaining
out
on
the
East
End
driving
through
they're,
not
expected
to
come
downtown.
There's
no
confirmed
numbers
at
this
point,
and
that
was
the
that
was
the
end
of
that.
That
portion
in
terms
of
the
incontinence
came
I
got
checked.
M
There
is
one
in
captain
of
1500
Bronson,
the
police
made
the
decision
and
rather
have
those
vehicles
and
trucks
park
in
the
neighborhood
residential
streets.
They
asked
the
federal
government
owns
the
property
to
allow
some
vehicles
to
park
there.
We
have
a
photo
of
that
now.
There's
there
are
some
vehicles
in
that
parking
lot.
M
G
R
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you,
city
manager,
for
the
brief
update
the
encampment
that
you
mentioned
at
1500,
Bronson
Avenue,
so
no
Outreach
with
my
office
from
anyone
at
the
city
or
the
police
I'm,
not
sure
why
the
city
and
or
police
would
condone
a
new
encampment
in
a
new
neighborhood.
The
rationale
given
to
me
this
morning
was
that
the
police
wanted
to
avoid
overburdening
the
downtown
core
with
more
vehicles
and
then
condone
or
permitted
the
establishment
of
this
without
any
type
of
Outreach.
R
M
Mr
Mayor
I
can't
answer
that
question
the
police
direct
where
the
vehicles
go
and
the
police
manage
how
they
the
logistics
of
where
those
Vehicles
go.
They
obviously
made
a
decision
that
they
would
prefer
to
have
them
on
1500
Bronson
rather
than
neighborhood
streets
in
the
adjoining
streets,
but
that's
a
question
to
be
directed
to
the
police,
chief
or
Deputy
Bell,
or
one
of
the
officers
that
comes
onto
one
of
the
calls.
R
In
in
lieu
of
anyone
from
the
Ops
here,
if,
if
they
don't
arrive
before
this
meeting
ends,
Mr
city
manager
and
I
will
follow
up,
of
course.
But
can
you
please
take
note
of
this?
That
we
should
part
of
progress?
Is
we
don't
establish
new
encampments
in
neighborhoods
I?
Don't
want
new
vehicles
coming
to
the
downtown
corner,
but
we're
also
expecting
that
we're
not
going
to
see
new
camps
in
other
neighborhoods.
R
So
it's
just
disappointing
to
see
that
I
saw
that
last
night,
some
Drone
footage
before
I
went
to
bed
and
reached
out
and
get
the
answer
this
morning.
That's
the
Ops
facilitated
this
I'm
surprised.
The
federal
government
would
say
yes
to
this,
that
they
would
want
that
within
some
pretty
high
Security
Buildings
in
this
immediate
vicinity
in
Confederation
Heights.
R
Just
on
the
McKinney
motion,
I
support
this
it
it
makes
sense
it
has.
It
has
a
time
frame
which
I'm
sure,
if,
if
it
needs
to
be
Revisited,
Council
can
look
at
it,
but
because
of
the
time
frame
this
and
next
week
and
with
all
the
ongoing
challenges
appreciate
the
conversations
I've
had
with
councilor
McKinney
as
well.
Over
the
last
couple
weeks,
I
certainly
will
be
supporting
that
motion
before
us,
but
to
Mr
city
manager.
I
would
like
to
have
some
more
information
from
the
Ops
as
soon
as
possible.
R
I
I
It
puts
counsel
in
the
city
to
shame
like
I,
want
to
understand
why
we
as
a
city,
can't
lead
on
some
of
these
injunctions
it
it
was
successful
and
was,
and
and
and
and
had,
impacts,
I,
don't
know
if
you've
gone
through
Catherine,
McKinney
and
and
my
area
in
the
last
24
hours,
but
from
a
noise
perspective,
it's
significantly
changed
so
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you
on
like.
Why
didn't
we
get
ahead
of
that?
H
Counselor
with
respect
to
that
particular
injunction,
if
you're
wondering
why
the
city
is
not
a
party
to
it,
simply
the
the
simple
answer
there
is
that
that
is
a
junction
or
Rises
out
of
a
class
action.
I
I
understand
your
point
to
me.
Why
isn't
the
city
itself
proceeding
with
an
injunction
to
that
end?
We
have
been
working
with
the
Ottawa
Police
again.
H
H
So
as
we
work
with
police,
the
idea
is
to
ensure
that
that
whatever
we
ask
the
court
to
to
prevent
people
from
doing
is
something
that
can
be
can
be
fit
within
a
broader
police
operational
plan.
Appreciating
that,
like
the
injunction
that
was
granted,
it
may
only
be
available
for
an
initial
period,
That's
often
10
days.
H
So
we
continue
to
work
with
with
the
Ottawa
Police
and
our
colleagues
there
to
Define
what
that
might
be
in
the
event
that
there
is
a
determination
and
the
police
believe
that
there
is
an
injunction
that
the
city
could
obtain.
That
will
allow
them
to
to
better
handle
issues
in
the
community
or
better
address
and
exercise
their
powers
than
we
are
there
to
support
them.
H
But
those
are
the
considerations,
because
there
are,
of
course,
risks
of
proceeding
with
an
injunction
if
it's
not
granted
or
even
if
it's
granted
but
then
can't
be
enforced
or
if
it's
it
can
be
mired
in
court
or
could
be
appealed,
because
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
can,
for
example,
embolden
protesters.
So
that's
it's
in
that
context
that
we
continue
to
work
with
police.
H
I
Perhaps
I
could
ask
for
a
briefing
and
those
impacted
could
ask
for
a
briefing
with
your
legal
team,
because
to
me
an
injunction
on
just
getting
our
bus
routes
back
on
the
ground
would
be
a
very,
very
decent
one.
We
have
a
duty
to
residents
of
Ottawa
to
run
the
essential
service,
which
is
buses
and
The.
Detour
routes
that
have
been
provided
are
not
sufficient.
Paratranspo
is
struggling
to
access
clients.
To
me,
there's
tons
of
like
noise
was
a
massive
one.
I
No
question
and
I
want
to
thank
the
community
lawyers
and
and
the
resident
who
brought
that
class
forward,
but
I
think
like
this
idea
that
we're
waiting
on
police
to
guide
this,
we
have
responsibilities
as
city,
council
and
city
that
were.
We
need
to
be
responsible
to
Residents,
so
I
wonder
because
I
only
have
five
minutes
here.
Is
it
possible
to
follow
up
with
my
team,
councilor
McKinney
I?
I
Don't
want
to
add
that
if
you're
not
interested
but
I'd
like
to
sit
down
with
the
legal
team
and
mayor's
office
and
so
on,
to
have
a
conversation
on
what
are
the
ranges
of
impacts
because
to
us
like
transit,
for
example,
is
a
big
one.
It's
a
massive
one.
If
we
can't
get
transit
to
operate
then
and
and
David
I
I
caution,
you
I'm
not
I'm,
not
a
lawyer,
but
I.
I
Don't
think
that
anyways
I
I
wonder
if
you
could
take
that
away
and
reach
back
into
us,
I
I'm
not
going
to
direct
legal,
but
I
would
like
to
understand
more
in
more
detail
what
what
injunctions
you
are
considering
and
looking
at
and
if
you've
considered
some
that
I.
You
know
I've
raised
one,
but
I
have
other
ideas
as
well.
H
Certainly
Mr
Mayor
I'm
happy
to
have
my
team,
whether
it
be
with
members
of
council
coordinated
with
the
police.
Anyone
like
that
I
am
mindful
at
the
end
of
the
day,
though,
that
the
municipality
is
not
a
law
enforcement
Authority,
as
has
been
reinforced
by
by
The
Province
by
the
federal
government.
This
is
a
law
enforcement
activity.
To
the
extent
that
we
can
support
that,
we
are
there
to
to
do
that,
but,
as
I
say,
I'm
happy
to
see
what
we
can
coordinate
in
that
regard.
I
I
I'd
be
glad
to
I'd,
be
glad
to
assist
I
would
I
would
ask
that
Ops
not
be
present
the
resident
and
a
Class
Act
did
not
include
Ops.
They
did
not
ask
for
ops's
position
on
on
noise,
so
you
know
you're,
adding
those
conversations
with
Ops
I'm
interested
in
having
a
conversation
with
our
legal
team
to
understand
what
the
city
can
do.
I
I
have
inquiries
too
so
I
wonder
how
are
we
managing
the
range
of
inquiries
that
that
are
happening
that
are
happening
through
this?
Maybe
the
clerk
can
advise
us
because
I
you
know
my
community
is
asking
to
bring
motions.
Any
inquiries
forward
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
information
is
captured
for
future
future
considerations.
M
Mr
bear
the
the
emotions
and,
and
anything
that
rolls
out
of
the
the
special
counsel
meeting
is
being
coordinated,
obviously,
with
the
clerks
call,
the
various
City
departments
to
action
and
to
to
fulfill
and
report
back
to
either
committee
or
Council.
As
directed
all
the
other
inquiries
and
I
know,
we've
been
using
this
before
now,
counselors
have
been
using
other
alternative
means,
but
the
counselor
liaison
function
is
the
best
way
to
centralize
and
capture
all
the
inquiries.
I
D
Yeah,
the
the
meaning
well,
their
meetings
over
zoom
and
over
the
phone
went
very
well.
The
federal
government
is
understands
our
need
for
additional
resources
in
a
a
very
quick
period
of
time
and
they're.
Now
working
out
with
our
officials,
the
numbers
and
the
timetable
to
get
more
police
officers
here
in
Ottawa
and
I
have
a
call
with
ministers
at
the
provincial
level
this
afternoon
on
the
same
topic
based
on
the
letter
that
councilor
Deans
and
I
sent.
D
P
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
I
appreciate
that
we're
getting
these
updates.
Things
have
changed
since
Monday
evening
and
we
need
to
hear
about
it.
I
am
concerned
about
this,
this
area
that
is
being
used
to
help
the
occupiers
that
is
not
downtown
and
I,
feel
like
we're,
aiding
and
abetting,
and
we
have
to
come
up
with
a
way
to
stop
this.
P
P
I
appreciate
when
we're
talking
about
injunctions
and
I
want
to
thank
those
that
put
it
together,
the
the
honking
injunction
it
was,
it
was
brilliant
and
frankly,
it
doesn't
look
good
on
us,
but
it
was
very
specific
and
I
I
get
your
point
Mr
White
about
having
to
be
specific,
because
if
you
have
something
too
broad,
it's
not
gonna
hold,
but
there's
other
specifics.
I
can't
believe
the
number
of
fire
hazards
that
are
going
on
I
I
spent
the
weekend.
P
P
It
just
involved
with
my
mind
that
that
we
did
the
paperwork,
we
did
everything
proper
so
that
the
community
could
have
something
for
their
Carnival
and
and
then
we
can't
do
anything
about
downtown
fire
hazards
are
real
it.
It
really
does
worry
me
and
I.
I
I
can't
understand
how
we
can't
go
after
that.
P
I
think
that
councilor
Fleury
raised
a
good
point
about
the
bus
service,
which
is
also
essential
service.
We've
always
talked
about
it
as
an
essential
service,
so
those
are
other
things.
So
those
are
my
my
concerns
and
I
just
feel
like.
We
have
to
do
everything
we
can
to
to
go
after
this
aiding
and
abetting.
M
Well,
Mr
Mayor,
I,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
the
logistics
occurred
and
what
discussions
happen
with
the
federal
government,
the
police,
in
terms
of
doing
that
they.
What
I
do
know
is
that
police
had
some
tough
choices
to
make.
The
truckers
are
they're,
not
they're,
not
participating
in
terms
of
saying.
Can
you
please
park
here
in
this
slot?
M
They
just
dropped
their
truck
off
in
the
middle
of
a
residential
street,
or
so
police
are
working
with
them,
with
the
police
liaison
teams
to
try
and
and
bring
some
order
to
the
chaos
and
have
the
trucks
parked
in
the
most
disruptive
way.
I
understand
what
councilor
Brockton
saying
in
terms
of
yeah
surprise:
we've
got
some
trucks
on
bronza
and
at
1500
Bronson,
but
they
were
overflow
vehicles
from
the
Coventry
Road
site
and
they
had
to
put
them
somewhere.
They
would
have
parked
anywhere,
so
they
wanted
to
get
it
under
control.
M
Police
made
an
operational
decision
in
real
time,
contacted
the
federal
government
through
our
probably
through
our
control
center,
because
they're
in
there
we
have
an
integrated
Command
Center
and
they
gave
the
okay
to
put
the
trucks
there.
I
I
can't
give
you
more
than
that
I
wasn't
on
the
ground.
No
one
spoke
to
me
about
that
decision.
M
It
happened
in
real
time
in
the
moment
where
they're
trying
to
do
their
best
to
keep
trucks
off
residential
streets,
they're
parked
in
the
middle
of
Bronson
Avenue,
that's
kind
of
the
decisions
they
make
and
they're
tough
calls
and
once
they
get
there,
good
luck,
moving
them
as
we've
seen
at
Coventry
and
we've
seen
downtown.
So
that's
the
issue
that
we're
in
across
the
whole
city.
It's
not
unique
to
this
particular
situation.
P
L
L
Yeah,
okay,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that,
just
on
the
issue
of
an
injunction
I
think
that
it's
really
important
to
you
know
publicly
state
that
you
know
a
violation
of
a
court
order
really
is
a
contempt
of
court
and
and
it's
a
very
serious,
offense
and
I
do
believe
that
people
who
have
to
make
their
livelihood
driving
trucks
do
take
that
maybe
not
all
of
them
but
seriously
so
I.
L
Just
wonder
if
two
things
you
know
has
there
is
that
looking
as
Legal
Services
looking
at
an
injunction
for
idling,
just
given
the
toxicity
of
the
fumes
and
the
diesel
that
that
are
occurring
just
outside
of
people's
windows
and
and
I,
guess
on
that
I.
Just
wonder
too.
If
Public
Health
has
measured
the
air
quality
downtown,
but
I
really
want
to
know
whether
staff
legal
staff
are
working
on
an
injunction
vis-a-vis,
idling
and
the
the
fumes,
because,
if
not
do
we
need
a
motion
here
today
to
ask
you
to
do
that.
H
H
As
I
say
you
know,
our
our
effort
is
to
balance
the
likelihood
of
success
with
the
likelihood
that
whatever
we
do
is
going
to
have
a
material
impact
on
the
the
lawlessness
and
and
from
our
purposes,
violations
of
provincial
or
or
Municipal
law.
That's
certainly
an
element
that
we
can
look
at
in
incorporating
it,
for
example,
if
if
there
is
to
be
an
injunction,
then
filed
as
as
one
or
more
elements
in
that
regard,
I'm
not
I
I.
Just
so
you
know,
counselor
one
of
the
questions.
H
L
No
I
can
appreciate
that,
except
that
I
think
that
the
same
would
have
held
for
the
the
the
injunction
on
on
the
horns
and
it
so
is
it
possible
then,
for
staff
I
don't
want
to
you
know.
Obviously
you
can't
give
us
a
clear
answer
today
and
we
can't
wait
two
weeks,
but
is
it
possible
for
legal
staff
to
come
back
in
the
next
say
day
to
give
us?
L
H
H
M
M
It
really
falls
to
the
provincial
governments
to
regulate
and
enforce
that,
and-
and
the
challenge
of
course,
is
that
you
have
trucks
for
multi-jurisdictional
provinces
here
in
town
they're,
not
just
Ontario,
and
so
you
know,
the
federal
government
has
looked
at
this
very
carefully
from
what
they
regulate
and
they
do
not
have
regulatory
Authority
in
this
space
with
partic
with
these
particular
transport
trucks.
But
the
provinces
do
so.
The
ask
is
being
made
of
Ontario,
Alberta
and
other
provinces
whose
plates
are
represented
here
in
the
downtown
core
to
pursue.
M
We've
asked
to
pursue
whatever
regulatory
mechanisms
they
have
or
any
tools.
They
have
to
put
pressure
on
an
impact:
the
licensing,
the
insurance,
there's
cvor
commercial
vehicle
operating
registry
to
start
impacting
them
Downstream,
which
makes
it
much
more
difficult
for
them
to
continue
operating.
So
that's
being
looked
at
it.
It's
not
it's
not
going.
You
know,
as
we've
discussed
it.
It's
not
a
short-term
Silver
Bullet.
L
L
Council,
you
know
that
we
asked
for
daily
updates.
I
will
relate
to
the
county
service
that
you'd
be
interested
in
hearing
more
about
plans
for
the
weekend.
Okay
and
it
can
be
today
or
tomorrow.
You
know
whatever
gives
us
the
best
Intel
really
into
what's
happening.
I'll
pass
that
message.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
just
very
quickly
Mr
Mayor,
just
speaking
to
my
motion,
yeah
I'm,
just
I'm
just
again
appealing
for
for
your
help.
L
This
is
yeah
I'm
asking
for
we're
asking
for
nine
days
really
without
committee
committee
meetings,
it's
not
about.
What's
on
the
agenda
items,
you
know:
Transit
I'm,
always
yeah
pushing
for
more
Transit
subcommittee,
meeting
or
committee
meetings
rather
than
less
but
I.
Just
you
know
even
being
here
today
as
much
as
I
enjoy
all
your
of
your
company.
L
It
means
that
I'm
I'm
not
responding
to
very
important
messages
and
and
appeals
from
from
residents
who
are
really
living
in
the
middle
of
all
of
this,
so
I
yeah
again
nine
days,
I
I
really
don't
think
that
anybody
leading
this
movement
Convoy
even
knows
we
have
committee
meetings,
I'm,
not
sure
it'll
be
a
win
for
them.
I.
Don't
think
that
the
legislative
agenda
of
city
council
really
is
a
concern
too.
L
The
leaders
of
this
of
this
illegal
occupation
so
I,
you
know,
and
we've
had
a
other
they've
had
other
wins
on
us.
This
is
not
going
to
be
anything
that
they're
going
to
put
a
notch
in
their
belt
on,
so
I
really
do
yeah
appeal
to
just
nine
days.
It
just
gives
us
time,
as
councilor
leaper
said
the
other
day
for
breather,
and
we
just
cannot
if
you're
in
the
middle
of
this.
This
there's
just
no
way
that
I
can
represent
my
residents
at
committee
meetings
and
I'm
on
every
committee.
L
D
Great,
thank
you.
I'm
wondering
councilor
I.
Think
I
have
a
copy
of
your
motion
here.
The
one
area
that
a
number
of
colleagues
spoke
to
was
the
concern
about
the
the
Civic
Hospital
and
I'd
be
quite
prepared
to
support
your
motion
with
a
friendly
amendment
that
that
one
item
at
tomorrow's
meeting
go
ahead.
I
talked
to
the
president
of
the
hospital.
They
were
very
appreciative
of
the
fact
that
we
were
going
to
move
forward
because
they
indicated
one
month
delay
would
cost
some
nine
to
11
million
dollars.
D
We
have
over
25
people
from
the
public
that
are
coming
to
expecting
to
speak
tomorrow
and
I.
Think
that
would
be
a
a
reasonable
compromise
between
your
legitimate
concerns
about
overload
on
on
particularly
you
and
counselor
Fleury,
who
have
the
most
challenges
in
your
ward,
and
it
would
deal
with
a
legitimate
concern.
We
have
for
this
significant
city
building
project
on
the
growth
of
the
the
Ottawa
hospital,
so
I'd
be
quite
prepared
to
accept
and
vote
for
your
Motion
in
its
entirety
to
cancel
until
the
date.
I
can't
remember
the
exact
date.
D
The
18th,
with
the
one
exception
of
the
one
item
remaining
on
planning,
which
is
tomorrow
because
I
think
you
know
to
to
cancel
something
of
that
significance.
One
day
at
Advance
is
not
reasonable
to
the
people
who
want
to
come
and
speak
to
it,
nor
to
our
partner
at
the
hospital
who
have
I'm
sure
have
many
well-paid
people
that
are
lined
up
to
speak
and
answer
questions.
L
L
D
L
L
K
Thank
you,
counselor
Menard,
thanks
very
much
mayor.
I
too,
am
getting
messages
around
schools
and
businesses
in
capital
Ward
with
harassment
occurring
and
new
trucks
on
their
block
there's
more
today,
and
the
concern
is
that
we're
seeing
messages
calling
for
reinforcements
right
and
the
and
the
reason
I
mention
this-
is
that
it's
it's
escalating.
It's
not
the
other
way
around.
It's
getting
more
dug
in
it's
getting
worse.
K
M
And
Mr
Mayor,
my
understanding
is:
it
was
an
overflow
from
the
influx
of
trucks
that
arrived
at
Coventry
Road
and
they
had
to
move
some
or
were
arriving
after
the
fact
and
that
they
had
to
move
them
somewhere
and
they
had
no
other
public
space
to
put
them.
What
it's
morphing
into
I
can't
answer
that
question
counselor!
That's
for
police
to
answer
in
terms
of
their
monitoring,
but
that
was
the
original
intent
of
why
they
moved
them
to
that
that
spot.
K
Okay,
I
just
I'd,
be
appreciate,
bringing
in
on
the
briefings
with
councilor
Brockington
on
this
as
well.
We
didn't
get
a
heads
up
at
all
about
this,
and
so
having
briefings
would
be
helpful,
I'm
sure,
counselor
King
didn't
get
a
heads
up
either
about
Coventry
previously,
so
these
sorts
of
things
we
need
regular
briefings.
K
You
know
we
reach
out
and
we
ask
questions
over
the
the
Council
of
liaison
thing,
but
these
are.
This
is
more
required
here,
given
the
amount
of
resources
and
time
spent
on
this,
I
can
tell
you
I'm
not
really
sleeping,
very
well
I,
don't
know
how
the
rest
of
you
are
sleeping,
but
it's
been.
You
know
constant.
Every
waking
moment
is
spent
on
this
issue.
K
You
wake
up
and
you
think
about
what
you
can
do
to
help
how
you're
going
to
respond
to
Residents
what
you
can
do
to
assist,
and
this
is
just
overtaken
our
city
and
it's
an
international
issue.
This
is
not
just
a
local
issue.
This
is
everywhere,
and
so
every
waking
moment
for
me
personally
is
spent
thinking
about
this
and
I'm,
not
sleeping
well
as
a
result
of
it.
I'm
sure
others
are
the
same
on
this
on
this
call.
K
Regarding
the
EOC
response,
do
we
have
a
fire
suppression
teams
in
the
Red
Zone
constantly
giving
given
the
amount
of
fuel
and
running
equipment
that
we're
seeing
there
I'm
getting
concerns
from
from
residents
and
from
other
experts
from
fcm
he's
in
about
diesel
fuel
into
the
into
the
drainage
as
well
into
our
sewer
system?
So
I
just
do
we
have
that
ongoing
in
terms
of
fire
suppression
teams
up
in
the
red
zone
came
out.
G
There
we
go
thank
you
mayor.
We
don't
have
them
independently
in
the
Red
Zone.
We
have
them
accompanied
by
police
and
they
do
go
in
for
any
burn
barrels.
We
took
one
down
yesterday
at
Metcalf
and
Sussex
and
they
continue
to
go
in
and
put
them
out
with
police
escort
again.
Sometimes
it
takes
a
little
longer
to
get
in
based
on
the
the
police
resources
necessary
to
actually
accompany
them
to
prevent
any
potential
swarming.
G
G
The
acting
fire
chief
Paul
hunt,
continues
to
assess
the
situation
with
regards
to
potential
potential
dangers
and
if
there's
anything
that
has
an
imminent
danger
to
injury
or
to
a
fire
hazard,
then
it's
discussed
with
the
police
in
an
effort
to
say
we
have
to
go
in
and
take
care
of
this
now.
So
that's
that's
the
plan
and
that's
how
it's
been.
It's
been
operationalized.
K
Since
the
beginning,
okay,
I
really
appreciate
that
straight
out
and
and
I
think
the
more
we
can
get
on
that
I
know.
Towing
is
difficult
right
now,
but
the
you
know,
OC
transport
Vehicles
other
vehicles
that
we
can
actually
procure
potentially
to
start
this
process.
I
think
would
also
be
helpful
but
appreciate
that
update
on
on
fire.
The
last
thing
I'll
mention
mayor
with
regard
to
committees
nine
days-
would
give
a
lot
of
breathing
room.
K
I
appreciate
that
appreciate,
counselor
McKinney's
motion
and
your
you
know:
Olive
Branch
around
the
hospital
hospital
will
be
eight
to
twelve
hour
meeting.
At
least
it's
going
to
be
a
long
time.
It's
the
garage
right,
it's
the
parking
garage,
it's
not
the
hospital
parking
garage,
I'm.
Okay,
to
do
that.
L
D
That
may
I
don't
know
if
everyone
else
still
wishes
to
speak.
We've
got
about
six
speakers
and
I'm,
conscious
of
everyone's
desire
to
get
back
to
their
their
constituents
and
the
situation
at
hand.
So
if
Carey
I
think
the
addition
is
on
the
screen
now
do
individuals
wish
who
have
their
hand
up
now,
want
to
speak
to
that
or
they
have
questions
on
an
operational
side
of
things.
Jared.
O
O
Think
Mr
Mayor,
first
of
all,
just
just
councilman
Kenny,
had
raised
a
question
about
idling
and
and
testing
air
quality
and
public
Health's
role.
So
I
stepped
away
from
the
meeting
to
to
reach
out
to
Dr
edges
and
my
role
as
chair,
and
she
indicated
not
surprisingly
that
that
public
health
absolutely
thinks
that
the
idling
is
is
a
health
issue.
O
She
doesn't
believe
that
testing
is
required
because,
on
the
face
of
it
it's
a
health
issue.
Such
testing
would
normally
be
done
in
conjunction
with
and
with
the
ministry,
the
environment.
They
generally
take
the
lead
on
this
and
have
the
the
equipment
and
Personnel
to
do
that.
But
I
guess
the
short
answer
to
councilman
Kenny's
inquiry
is
yes.
Public
health
does
think
that
idling
just
on
the
face
of
it,
is
a
problem
and
it
shouldn't
be
happening.
O
O
Thank
you.
So
my
question
to
you
is
this:
is
the
injunction
that
was
successful
for
the
10
days
brought
on
behalf
of
the
private
citizen?
There
is
an
enforcement
component
to
that
and
I'm,
assuming
that
the
enforcement
is
being
carried
out
or
the
court
is
directed
to
be
carried
out
and
the
arm
of
that
enforcement
is
either
by
law
and
or
the
police
correct.
O
So
I
guess
to
to
to
the
to
the
threat
of
questioning,
raised
first
I,
think
by
councilor
Fleury
as
to
why
the
city
hasn't
come
forward
and
Mr
White.
You
indicated
that
one
of
the
concerns
was
around
enforcement.
If
we
went
forward
with
an
injunction,
it
was
important
that
we'd
be
able
to
enforce
it.
O
So
I
guess.
My
question
is
this:
if
other
people
are
bringing
injunctions
on
our
behalf,
though,
and
without
our
involvement
because
I
understand,
we
weren't
a
party
to
this
particular
action
being
a
class
action,
are
we
not
running
the
risk
of
losing
losing
the
thread
so
to
speak
on
the
enforcement
piece
and
a
judge
saying
yes
I
like
that
and
that
that
injunction
I'm
going
to
Grant
it
and
so
police
are
now
and
and
bylaw
are
now
direct
it
or
ask
to
enforce
on
a
b
c
and
d?
O
And
we
don't
we're
not
having
a
discussion
about
that
really
at
the
city
level
and
with
those
Services
if
private
injunctions
are
going
forward,
but
we're
finding
out
about
it
after
the
fact
and
then
it's
being
presented
to
our
enforcement
arm
or
this
not
enforcement
runs
you're
right.
The
city
is
not
an
agency
of
enforcement,
but
B
is
being
presented
to
the
police
and
bylaw
and
saying
this
is
now.
This
is
now
the
rule
in
the
city.
O
You
can't
you
can't
idle
or
you
can't
blow
your
horns
or
you
can't
gather
or
whatever,
whatever
it
happens,
to
be
and
we're
coming
in
after
the
fact.
Wouldn't
it
make
more
sense
for
us
to
be
there
at
the
front
end,
and
then
we
could
have
those
discussions
in
front
of
the
judge
as
to
what
we
think
is
doable
or
not
doable
from
from
the
perspective
of
of
those
enforcement
agencies.
H
Mr
Mayor,
that's
that's
I'll,
be
on
that's
precisely
why
we,
we
are
working
with
the
police
in
that
regard,
so
we
are
in
lockstep
going
forward
with
whatever
whatever
injunction
we
would
be
looking
to
obtain
so
again
for
our
own
purposes,
for
public
confidence
in
in
our
ability
to
to
whether
it
be
enforced,
bylaws
or
anything
like
that
that
that
that
is
something
that
we
are.
Obviously
we
don't.
We
don't
purport
to
represent
the
police.
H
If,
for
example,
it's
a
mandatory
injunction
that
that
is
something
that
can
that
the
public
can
see
an
effect
on
the
ground
and
the
event
that
there
are
violations
of
it,
that
the
police
have
the
ability
to
move
in,
whether
that
be
the
legal
Authority,
but
also
even
just
the
operational
ability,
whether
that's
a
question
of
human
resources
or
equipment,
or
anything
like
that.
So
that's
a
discussion
we
can.
We
have
on
an
ongoing
basis
when.
O
I
guess
is,
and
and
that's
what
concerns
me
in
in
the
approach
that
we're
taking
to
the
injunctions.
Is
that
we're
not
part
of
the
discussion
with
with
these
injunctions
going
forward
to
judges
and
but
we
have
to
be
available
or
those
Services
have
to
be
available
somehow
to
do
whatever
the
judge
is
directed
or
asked
to
to
to
be
enforced,
so
that
I
just
put
that
out
more
as
a
concern.
I
guess
than
anything
else.
O
I
guess.
My
question
is:
where
do
we
stand
looking
at
options?
Over
and
above
now
that
we've
declared
the
State
of
Emergency?
The
procurement
rules
are
different
or
more
flexible,
more
Nimble.
Where
are
we
in
terms
of
finding
alternative
providers
or
Machinery
to
assist
the
assist,
the
police
and
the
removal
of
the
truck.
M
The
situation
Mr
Mayor,
has
not
changed
from
what
I
described
the
other
day.
We
still
don't
have
a
lot
of
tow
truck
operators
in
the
heavy
vehicle,
tow
truck
operators,
the
small
ones-
that's
not
an
issue,
the
ones
that
do
cars
we
are
reaching
out
to
Municipal
counterparts
in
Ontario,
looking
to
see.
If
anybody
has
any
vehicles
on
on
in
their
inventory
of
fleet
vehicles,
they
own
they
operate.
M
The
city
bottle
has
two
with
staff,
but
we
operate,
but
so
far
we
had
one
company
that
was
initially
said,
local
that
they
would
participate.
Then
they
withdrew
the
same
day.
So
now
we're
looking
at
you
know,
obviously
all
our
procurement
and
our
contracts
with
them
and
all
that
legal
stuff,
but
that's
not
going
to
solve
our
immediate
problem.
I
mean
all
these
things
take
time
and
it
still
doesn't
Force
someone
to
bring
up
their
trucks.
M
O
And
and
last
question
is:
has
it
been
explored
or
is
there
a
way
Mr
Cadillac
is
to
engage
military
equipment
without
engaging
the
military?
If
you
follow
me
so
I'm
not
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
the
you
know
that
the
troops
be
called
in
or
anything
like
that.
At
this
juncture,
we've
had
that
discussion
last
council
meeting
whether
we
should
go
down
that
road
or
not,
but
is
there,
is
there
an
independent
way
because,
as
I
understand
it
there,
there
is
some
military
equipment
that
might
be
up
to
moving
these
trucks?
M
M
On
that
it's
a
great
question:
yes,
I
wouldn't
have
thought
of
that,
but
it's
you're
still
on
the
edge
of
of
invoking
the
bringing
the
military
into
the
into
the
situation
and
there's
only
the
only
way
to
get
that
is
through
that
formal
process.
David
am
I
interpreting
what
I've
read
in
terms
of
and
I've
had
discussions
with
the
feds
on
aspects
of
this
so
David
is:
am
I
off
base.
H
Mr
iron
I
think
the
city
managers
has
accurately
described
it
like
we
can't
at
the
city
pretend
to
to
know
all
the
intricacies
of
what
the
military
might
or
might
not
do.
But
to
that
end
the
simple
fact
is
if
the
military
is
to
be
provided,
that'll
be
on
terms
that,
obviously
the
federal
government
needs
to
decide
and
I'm
not
again
I'm,
not
aware
of
any
of
any
mechanisms
that
would
essentially
allow
the
loaning
to
the
to
the
municipality
in
some
kind
of
informal
manner
separate.
L
H
We
have
we
have
established
and
set
out
a
framework
of
what
an
injunction
would
look
like.
What
specifically
would
would
we
would
be
looking
to
drop
into
that,
whether
it
be
in
relation
to
a
specific
geographical
area
or
the
specific
conduct
or
the
specific
activity
that
we
would
be
looking
to
to
enjoin.
H
L
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
My
next
question
is
to
Mr
kanelakis
Mr,
kanelakis
I
was
very
concerned
yesterday,
as
I'm
sure
many
others
were
as
well
during
the
briefing
when
deputy
chief
Steve
Bell
indicated
that
one
in
four
trucks
contains
children
and
deputy
chief
beyond
beyond
the
obvious
danger
to
those
children.
Deputy
chief
Bell
also
outline
concerns
about
Karma
carbon
monoxide
fumes,
noise
and
sanitation
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
provide
counsel
with
an
update
on
what
measures
are
being
taken
to
ensure
the
safety
of
those
children.
M
Mr
Mayor,
it's
it's
interesting!
That
question
is
asked
so
we're
just
speaking
with
Donna
gray
about
it
this
morning,
I
think
Donna's
on
the
line,
because
there
are
concerns
I'm,
not
sure,
if
we're
taking
any
measures
yet
because
it's
very
hard
to
access
those
areas,
but
there
has
been
some
thinking,
that's
gone
on
to
it.
Donna
are
you
available.
T
Thanks
Mr
Mayor,
yes,
just
in
terms
of
initial
stages
of
identifying
it
as
an
issue
that
we
would
need
to
address
to
the
communities
task
force
and
starting
to
plan
to
convene
Partners
around.
What
would
that
action
be
taken
outside
of
the
direct
action
that
police
would
be
taking
in
terms
of
their
role
of
working
with
Children's,
Aid,
Society
or
other
partners
that
they
would
need
in
terms
of
the
actual
on-site
issues
that
they're
seeing
and
we
would
be
looking
at
sports
around
the
community
as
well.
L
I'm
just
trying
to
imagine
what
that
would
look
like
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
provide
us
any
more
information,
but
how
do
like
do
we?
How
do
we?
How
do
we
ensure
the
protection
of
those
children
and
the
safety
of
those
children
and
the
harm
of
being
caused
to
them
by
fumes
and
and
noise,
and
all
of
those
other
things.
T
So
Mr
Mayor,
so
the
first
is,
you
know,
obviously
there's
a
duty
to
report
and
a
duty
to
look
at
the
risk
in
that
current
situation.
When
you
know
police
are
in
their
role
and
what
they're
doing
I'm
not
aware
of
that
at
this
point,
we're
reaching
out
just
to
try
to
get
a
sense
of
that
in
terms
of
the
broader
community
and
the
supports
you
know
we
are
looking
at,
have
people
reached
out
for
additional
supports?
T
N
N
It
shouldn't
be
up
to
Residents
to
seek
this
kind
of
protection
from
the
court
on
on
clearly
public
danger
and
harms.
They
would
like
to
know
that
the
city
has
the
has
has
them
protected.
Certainly
the
idling
is:
is
a
public
menace
the
air
quality
for
those
who
have
walked
around
even
not
on
Wellington,
but
you
know
even
south
of
Laurier
are
Center
Town
reefs
of
diesel
and
and
any
kind
of
injunction
that
we
can
seek
to
stop.
The
idling
is
a
is
a
public
health.
N
N
N
I
I
was
very
happy
to
hear
Mr
kanalakis's
intervention
that
there
is
being
work
being
done
on
it
at
the
MTO.
I
would
suggest
that
going
after
MTO
sorry
GoFundMe
on
the
funding
is
not
necessarily
within
the
city's
purview
either,
but
the
mayor's
intervention
on
that
was
clearly
critical
to
a
very
successful
effort.
I
understand
that
we
need
to
Marshal
our
resources.
N
I
will
leave
it
there.
I
I
am
very
keen
to
see
that
the
city
begins.
Seeking
those
injunctions
which
helps
us
with
enforcement,
which
sends
a
clear
message
to
the
protesters
the
idling
and
the
blocked
streets
have
to
end.
The
disruption
to
residences
is
just
completely
unacceptable
and,
and
for
those
who
may
be
part
of
the
the
occupation
organization,
understand
the
effect
that
this
is
having
on
thousands
and
thousands
of
people.
N
P
Thank
you
very
much
Mr
Mayor
and
thank
you
to
my
colleague,
councilor
King
for
seating
me
a
spot
here,
I'd
like
to
propose
a
motion
if,
if
I
may
and
I
believe
the
clerk
has
a
copy
of
it,
we've
been
talking
about
injunctions
and
and
I've
already
raised
the
issue
of
fire
hazards.
This
is
something
that
is
a
major,
a
major
issue.
That's
it's!
What
the
city
is
responsible
to
do
to
protect
our
citizens
overall
and
they're,
not
feeling
protected,
they're,
feeling
threatened
and
concerned.
P
I
think
this
is
something
that
should
be
looked
at
for
a
topic
for
an
injunction
again.
I
appreciate
that
a
resident
was
able
to
go
after
after
honking
and
I.
Don't
know
if
a
city
could
have
done
that,
but
we
have
a
big
responsibility
to
protect
our
citizens,
so
be
it
resolved
that
the
city
solicitor
review
the
possibility
of
pursuing
an
injunction
on
fire
hazards
such
as
open
flames
and
the
use
of
Jerry
cans.
P
An
advised
Council
of
his
findings,
as
well
as
other
potential
options
going
forward
at
the
earliest
opportunity,
and
we've
heard
other
topics
being
raised
that
are
the
city's
responsibility,
things
that
we
are
responsible
for
to
our
residents
for
and
they
are
being
disrupted
and
it's
more
than
an
inconvenience.
It's
it's
lifelines
that
are
are
being
interrupted,
especially
when
we
talk
about
Transit
so,
but
the
the
first
thought
I
had
was
about
the
fire
hazard
I.
Think
that
that's
a
big
concern
every
time
I
see
those
images.
P
It
scares
me
and
I've
already,
given
the
example
of
how
residents
dutifully
go
and
get
a
permit
for
for
a
bonfire
in
a
park
to
roast
marshmallows,
and
yet
we
have
we're
not
using
the
mechanisms
we
have
to
to
deal
with
this
and
I
think
it
would
be
an
ideal
subject
for
an
injunction
for
the
safety
of
our
residents,
because
I
really
am
in
fear
of
of
things
going
very
badly.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Thank
you.
Your
worship
and
I'd
like
to
support
councilor
Fleury's,
ask
of
staff
to
provide
an
update,
along
with
a
memo
so
I'd,
like
that
additional
element
added
concerning
a
legal
discussion
on
injunctions.
Definitely
because
of
the
challenges
we're
facing
are
so
immediate.
I
also
I'm,
proud
to
support
the
motion
that
was
just
introduced
by
councilor
Kavanaugh,
asking
for
an
injunction
on
fire
hazards,
including
open
flames
and
the
use
of
Jerry
camps
at
the
Coventry
site.
A
I
heard
reports
from
residents
and
saw
for
myself
fuel
storage
on
a
site
where
bonfires
were
also
reportedly
being
set.
As
a
consequence,
we
really
need
forward
action
on
this,
so
I
would
ask
for
your
support
on
councilor
Kavanaugh's
motion.
I
also
want
to
receive
updates
concerning
councilor
brockington's
concerns
about
providing
information
to
counselors
offices
after
enforcement
actions
are
taken
I,
along
with
the
rest
of
my
colleagues
here.
I
know.
A
We
all
understand
that
under
the
police
services
act,
Council
and
the
Police
Services
Board
are
prohibited
from
directing
the
day-to-day
operations
of
the
police
service,
but
updates
coordinated
by
City
staff
with
counselors
offices
concerning
police
decisions
concerning
overflow
parking
decisions
would
be
appreciated
to
allow
our
office's
time
to
properly
inform
impacted
residents.
So
I
would
like
to
also
be
involved
in
those
discussions.
I
think
that,
in
fact,
all
of
council
should
be
involved
with
those
discussions
undertaken
by
staff
since
consultation
did
not
take
place.
Councilor
Menard
was
right
in
his
observations.
A
They
consultations
with
our
offices
did
not
take
place
with
in
terms
of
a
coventry
site
and
that's
important
I
think
the
communication
around
that
is
important,
because
I
had
asked
the
question
at
Police
Services
Board
in
Mike
capacity
there,
whether
the
city
issued
any
permits
the
city
did
not
issue
any
permits.
Obviously,
for
this
protest
and
obviously
no
permits
were
also
issued
for
parking
at
that
site.
These
were
police,
operational
decisions
and
that's
understandable.
We're
not
you
know,
impacting
or
asked
about
those
decisions,
but
we
need
to
be
informed
of
them.
A
T
Can
we
not
just
prepare
a
number
of
other
injunctions
to
deal
separately
with
many
of
the
risks
that
we
see
in
you
know
in
terms
of
idling
and
Junction
against
the
island,
the
injunction
against
street
closures
that
impede
city
buses
from
using,
so
we
could
open
up
and
get
our
Transit
going
again
so
prepare
separate
injunctions
that
can
be
heard
separately
and
then
we
stand
a
better
chance
of
having
these
approved
by
by
the
court.
I
would
like
to
see
these.
T
T
We
can
be
successful
too,
but,
let's,
let's
just
try
so
I-
would
love
to
I,
don't
have
a
direction
ready
to
staff
or
a
motion
ready,
but
I
think
we
if
we
could
just
duplicate,
counselor
Kavanaugh's
motion
and
substitute
idling
for
sorry
the
fires
for
idling
and
and
street
closures
that
sort
of
thing
I'm
I'm
all
for
that
so
I
just
like
to
put
that
out
there.
Thank
you.
D
Just
up
to
Mr
White
from
a
process
point
of
view,
I'm,
not
sure
the
the
legal
approach
to
council
giving
direction
to
start
injunctions
and
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
necessarily
want
to
have
that
discussion
in
public
to
that
may
cause
some
grief
for
our
front
line
officers
and
so
on
so
Mr
White
is
there.
You
know
I,
don't
want
to
quell
the
debate
on
this,
but
I'm
not
sure
it's
going
to
be
that
helpful
to
have
too
much
of
your
strategy
released.
D
H
But
Mr
Mayor,
I
I,
don't
believe
that
that
a
council
direction
is
necessary.
I've,
certainly
taken
the
feedback
that
we've
we've
had
today,
with
respect
to
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
around
idling
with
respect
to
those
other
things
and
I've
asked
my
my
team
to
have
a
look
at
all
those,
as
you
say,
is
it
something
that
we
may
look
at
doing,
piecemeal
and
nibbling
away,
for
example,
at
that
some
of
the
the
more
Troublesome
issues
associated
with
the
protest.
H
That's
something
that
we
can
take
away
on
with
my
team
and
with
our
external
Council
and
go
away
and
see
how
we
we
for
want
to
have
a
better
operationalize
that
in
conjunction
again
with
enforcement.
Just
to
ensure
that
again,
the
the
enforceability
of
those
is
something
that
is
built
in
from
the
outset.
Rather
than
as
an
afterthought.
D
Okay,
so
I
think
that's
wise
counsel
and
perhaps
councilor
Kavanaugh
and
King,
given
what
our
city,
solicitors,
just
indicated,
it'd
probably
be
wise
to
withdraw
the
motion.
I
think
they
they
get.
The
the
same
with
counselor
me
and
I
think
the
issues
you've
raised
are
important
and
they've
heard
heard
you,
but
it
would
probably
not
be
in
our
best
interest
to
have
a
formal
motion
at
this
point.
Counselor.
Can
we
ask
for
your
withdrawal.
P
P
This
isn't
something
that
we
just
are
talking
about
ourselves.
I,
don't
think,
that's
any
great
secret
that
we
want
this
to
stop
and
we're
looking
at
injunctions.
So
I
think
it's
important.
That
councils
show
that
they
are
looking
at
this
and
including
idling.
These
are
separate
motions,
it's
not
a
basket
that
we're
putting
together,
but
these
are
like
there's
one
specifically
on
honking
that
worked.
D
I
think
I
think
councilor
Kavanaugh.
You
are
showing
your
your
interest
in
pursuing
this
by
the
debate
we've
had
for
the
last
half
hour
and
the
solicitor
has
suggested
that
it
may
not
be
necessary
to
have
this
done,
but
it's
within
your
rights,
obviously
to
have
it
I.
Just
don't
want
those
people
who
are
protesting
to
be
privy
to
our
strategy
so
that
they
could
actions
that
would
do
more
harm
than
good
but
per
se.
So
I
think
you,
you
understand
that
solicitor
has
heard
you.
T
Yes,
Mr
Mayor
I.
Don't
think
that
you
know
by
by
debating
this
we're
not
we're
not
indicating
to
the
leaders
of
this
Convoy
when
these
Junctions,
if
we're
that
we'll
be
filing
them,
when
we'd
be
moving
her
and
enacting
them.
I
think
they're
I
think
they're
smart
enough
to
realize
that
we're
looking
at
every
tool
in
our
toolbox,
but
we
have
to
do
that.
T
We
have
to
look
at
our
Tools
in
our
toolbox
and
act,
so
I
would
I
would
support
councilor
Kavanaugh's
motion
also
I'd,
just
like
to
ask
Donna
gray.
If
I
may
at
this
time
do
we
have
the
authority
to
go
in
like
to
support
Children's
Aid
to
go
in
and
assess
the
risk
of
the
children
who
are
in
these
convoys.
T
You
know
there
are
a
lot
of
children
they're
being
subjected
to
not
as
much
noise
but
but
the
diesel
fumes,
but
open
fires
and
all
kinds
of
you
know
risky
activities.
Can
we
go
in
and
can
we
assess
before
we
determine
which
way
we
should
be
acting
on
this
so
Mr
Mayor?
That
would
be
the
call
of
police
services
in
terms
of
their
investigation
or
their
their
scene
and
their
site
to
be
working
with
child
protection
and
Children's
Aid
Society,
who
would
be
directing
them
in
terms
of
those
activities.
T
So
in
terms
of
us
at
this
point
going
into
that,
the
most
appropriate
person
would
be
to
be
engaging
Children's
Aid.
If
there
is
a
concern
at
that
point
around
the
children
in
it
at
that
site
and
how
and
how
who
engages
them
Donna?
Is
it
a
council
that
asks
Children's
Aid
to
do
this?
It
would
be
through
police
services,
so
Ottawa
Police
Services
would
be
if
they
are
seeing
concerns
of
children
in
their
care.
T
That
would
be
working
with
Children's
Aid
Society
around
that
particular
situation,
and
we
would
protect
any
worker
who
goes
into
to
ask
a
few
questions.
I
would
assume
that's
good
in
terms
of
the
the
Inca
like
the
parking
on
Bronson
and
other
areas.
I
I
am
also
fearful
that,
once
they
start
parking,
they're
going
to
get
a
toll,
hold
and
be
very
difficult
to
move
I'd
like
to
see
an
injunction
that
we
do
not
allow
this
to
happen.
T
D
Yeah,
this
is
under
other
business,
I
added
the
item
at
the
request
of
counselor
Menard.
So
you
can
talk
to
the
only
motion
we
have
before
us
is
counselor
Kavanaugh's
motion
with
respect
to
the
fire
hazards,
but
this
is
a
mostly
an
opportunity
to
question
staff
on
any
issues
that
you
feel
needed.
Drastic.
J
J
This
is
a
lot
more
complicated
than
we
may
understand
and
I
don't
know
if,
because
of
my
role
in
education
and
Healthcare,
I
get
more
emails
and
calls
on
this,
but
a
lot
of
the
messages
I'm
getting
are
that
you
know
this
isn't
I'm
not
like
you
know,
I'm
sure,
you've
read
these
types
of
emails,
I'm,
not
an
anti-vaxxer,
I'm
I'm
vaccinated.
So
are
my
children.
J
But
what
I'm
here
in
this
protest
saying-
and
you
know
maybe
you're
getting
these-
maybe
it's
just
me-
is
that
this
is
about
our
children
and
the
state
of
their
mental
health
right
now
because
of
the
mandates.
So
you
know
we
have
children
who
haven't
been
able
to
participate
in
sports,
not
be
able
to
go
to
school
and
are
being
asked
to
get
vaccinated
and
potentially
banned
from
those
activities
unless
they
are
vaccinated,
and
these
this
is
the
the
tone
of
the
email
I'm
getting
and
on
my
response.
Always
is
absolutely.
J
We
have
many
crises
here
for
children,
so
for
us
to
go
into
go
up
to
a
truck
and
say
we
fear
for
your
child's
safety
and
well-being.
Here
the
response
could
be
well
so
do
I.
You
know,
that's
why
I'm
here
and
so
I
guess
you
know
it.
Isn't
our
authority
to
go
in
and
say
that
someone
you
know
Children's
Aid
needs
to
intervene.
It
isn't,
as
a
council,
I
guess.
J
As
I
said
at
the
beginning,
I
don't
know
what
the
emails
you're
getting
are,
but
it
could
very
well
be
that
the
people
who
are
here
are
more
concerned
about
their
children's
health
in
a
larger
sense
and
the
child
and
the
health
of
all
children
and-
and
that's
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
complicated
argument
for
us.
So
I
was
glad
to
hear
that
we
are
going
in
with
support
and
I
hope.
That
is
that
continues
to
be
the
case.
O
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
I'll
keep
it
brief
and
I'm
just
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
reports
in
in
my
area,
specifically
with
Blair
station
during
the
week
the
numbers
are
a
little
bit
less,
but
on
the
weekends,
the
parking
lot
is
full
of
pickup
trucks
with
flags
on
them
and,
of
course
those
people
are
hopping
on
to
our
Light
Rail
and
head
downtown
after
they
stopped
in
at
the
local
liquor
store
and
they
start
harassing
everybody
on
the
way
downtown.
O
So
I
guess
my
question
is
whose
control
is
I
assume
Steve?
If
you
want
to
answer
this,
these
special
constables
from
the
OC
perspective,
are
they
under
the
city's
direction?
Or
is
this
all
one
group
effort
control
center
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
nervousness
around
Blair
station
right
now
people
not
wearing
masks
our
poorer
ambassadors
are
getting
harassed.
It's
a
big
situation
for
sure.
M
What
would
you
expect
the
two
special
constables
to
do
with
40
men
sitting
there
unmasked
on
a
train,
speeding,
downtown
it
I
mean
it's
just
not
practical.
It
would
make
no
sense
for
anybody
enforcement
to
wade
into
that
group
and
take
them
on
so
you've
got
to
chat.
We've
got
challenges
there
and
it's
it's
challenges
of
resources
and
the
specials
are
doing
their
best.
O
O
They've
been
ticketing
like
crazy,
but
it's
just
it's
becoming
more
of
a
problem
like
let's
face
it,
people
aren't
getting
on
at
sewerville
station
or
you
know
all
we
they're
getting
on
where
you
know
they
can
get
their
liquor
Park
their
truck
and
and
head
downtown
and
I'm,
just
hoping
the
police
actually
are
taking
notice
of
that.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
add
today.
Thank
you.
Council.
D
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I,
just
want
to
add
into
this.
Since
now
transit's
been
brought
up
a
general
manager,
Renee
ml
Carr
has
staff
out
on
the
system
they're
wearing
the
red
vests
that
many
of
our
Riders
will
be
familiar
with
from
the
the
start
of
operations,
sort
of
Goodwill
ambassadors
to
try
to
find
and
offer
help
to
anybody
that
needs
any
help,
but
they're
also
extra
eyes
and
ears
on
the
system.
We
they're
they're
doing
what
they
can
and
I
think
I
would
hope.
B
All
of
council
would
agree
that
Transit
staff
have
done
a
very
good
job
of
keeping
Transit
across
the
city
moving.
We
were
not
able
to
get
buses
into
the
core,
but
certainly
thankfully,
because
we
have
an
LRT
system.
We
are
able
to
move
people
through
the
city
core
and
those
essential
workers
that
need
a
transit
system
to
get
to
where
they're
going
seem
to
be
able
to
get
there.
Certainly
there's
sometimes
there's
delays.
There's
delays
with
you
know
pedestrian
movement,
quite
frankly,
downtown
right
now.
B
So
there
are
things
happening,
but
I
I
want
to
hopefully
encourage
everybody
to
acknowledge
that
the
the
men
and
women
of
OC
transport
have
been
doing
everything
they
can
through
this
occupation,
to
keep
our
city
moving.
So
I
I
don't
want
to
leave
it
out
there
they're
letting
people
on
the
trains
with
alcohol
or
anything
they're,
doing
everything
they
can
to
keep
our
ridership
safe
and
to
keep
our
system
moving.
So
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor,
great.