►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – March 23, 2016
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – March 23, 2016
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
B
A
A
E
E
B
B
E
E
E
E
In
doing
so
in
November
2012,
while
facing
a
life-threatening
disease,
Tyson
was
granted
a
wish
from
the
make-a-wish
Eastern
Ontario
group,
with
his
wish,
Tyson
flew
to
Los
Angeles
to
meet
his
hero,
actor
Adam
Sandler,
who
does
extensive
philanthropic
work
with
vulnerable
youth,
while
filming
his
movies
inspired
by
the
actors,
generosity
and
hard
work
Tyson
set
out
to
share
the
opportunity
was
given
with
as
many
youth
as
possible
the
generosity
it
is
fo.
The
luck,
DeLeon,
aesthetic,
the.
E
With
Tyson's
mission
to
a
million
campaign
mission
to
a
million
is
an
ongoing
fundraising
project
to
raise
one
milli
dollars
for
maker,
rich
Eastern
Ontario,
so
100
local
kids
can
have
their
wishes
come
true,
a
truly
lofty
goal,
proving
that
no
dream
is
too
big.
Mission
to
a
million
has
resonated
with
residences
businesses
and
schools
alike.
Today,
Tyson
has
raised
over
$400,000,
which
is
amazing.
Congratulations,
Tyson
and
Tyson
has
also
done
much
more
than
raise
funds
for
make-a-wish
Eastern
Ontario.
His
campaign
has
inspired
his
community
in
Statesville
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
E
Not
only
is
Tyson
raising
important
funds
for
make-a-wish
Eastern
Ontario
through
his
actions
he's
inspiring
a
culture
of
caring
in
his
community.
Local
birthday
parties
have
begun
to
collect
donations
rather
than
gifts
and
I
often
see
Tyson's
picture
I.
Think
your
pictures
in
the
sticks,
Ville
news
more
than
Chad's
he's
very
jealous,
but
I
often
see
all
of
these
great
initiatives
taking
place
in
schools
like
Statesville
public
school
donated
proceeds
from
their
annual
Santa's
second
sale
and
a
point
of
grey
Grace
dance
company
donated
ten
thousand
dollars
from
its
annual
marathon.
E
Despite
the
many
challenges
facing
Tyson,
his
perseverance
and
dedication
has
paid
off
recently
Tyson
celebrated
the
46th
wish
in
his
campaign
being
granted
with
no
sign
of
slowing
down
in
the
spirit
of
a
true
city.
Builder.
Tyson
often
says
that
every
time
the
funds
raised
by
mission
to
a
million
grants
a
wish,
it
feels
like
having
his
own
wish
granted
all
over
again
I'd
encourage
you
to
visit
Tyson's
website
mission
to
a
million
dot
CA
for
your
unwavering
dedication,
Tyson
to
mission
to
a
million
and
your
community.
It's
my
pleasure
on
behalf
of
councilor
Qadri.
F
A
A
F
F
E
E
Have
minutes
the
regular
and
in-camera
minutes
of
the
special
meeting
of
February
2016
and
of
the
minutes
of
the
regular
meeting
of
the
24th
of
February
Levent
cat?
Fifty
a
diamond
sighs,
okay
declaration
of
interests,
including
those
originally
arising
from
prior
meetings
as
Gabby
Davis
and
gentlemen,
are.
E
E
On
the
motions
carried,
thank
you
so
our
first
item
is
the
transit
Commission
and
we
have
a
motion
by
councillor
blade.
The
chair
of
the
Transit
Commission,
saying
by
the
vice-chair
councilor
caucus
and
I
know.
The
transit
commission
met
this
morning
and
a
number
of
you
were
at
that
meeting
and
I
want
to
congratulate
transit
staff
and
the
transit
Commission
for
securing
this
agreement.
Councilor
blade,
please.
I
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
therefore
be
resolved.
The
transit
commission
recommends
the
City
Council
ratify
the
tentative
agreement
reached
with
QP
5500,
transit
maintenance
and
transit
facilities,
maintenance
and
capital
projects,
branch
bargaining
unit,
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
the
terms
of
the
tentative
agreement
be
made
public.
E
Okay,
does
anyone
wish
to
speak
to
the
item?
I
just
wanted
to
offer
a
couple
of
comments,
one
of
the
most
important
initiatives,
as
we
all
know
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
is
undertaken
since
amalgamation
in
2001
is
the
construction
of
the
Confederation
line.
This
major
project
stands
to
transform
the
city
for
decades
to
come.
Suppose
a
Vikas
Bahl
may
not
reveal
this.
E
Line
has
been
to
solidify
the
city's
relationship
with
our
employees
and
their
unions.
Over
the
last
month,
the
Transit
Commission
and
City
Council
have
concluded
collective
agreements
with
the
Amalgamated
Transit
Union
to
79
the
Kane
Union
Public
Employees,
local
5500,
being
transit
security
enforcement
group,
the
transit
maintenance
and
transit
facilities,
maintenance
and
capital
projects,
branch
and
transit
supervisors
bargaining
units.
These
negotiated
settlements
cover
more
than
85%
of
ossie
transfers,
approximately
2000
summon
how
to
employ,
and
these
agreements
will
provide
a
stable
foundation
for
the
testing
commissioning
launch
at
operation
of
the
Confederation
line
in
2018.
E
In
addition
to
all
of
our
important
celebrations
in
2017
for
the
sesquicentennial,
these
four
collective
agreements
reflect
the
positive
and
collaborative
relationship
between
the
city
and
our
valued
employees.
I
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
our
union
partners,
many
of
whom
are
in
the
gallery
with
us
today.
Our
transit
employees,
our
Transit
Commission,
under
the
leadership
of
councillor
Blaine
and
members
of
council,
for
everyone's
hard
work
and
maintaining
a
very
positive
climate
for
rate
Labor
Relations
at
the
City
of
Ottawa
I've,
never
seen
those
employer
I.
E
Carried
adopt
a
thank
you
reports
from
the
city,
clerk
and
solicitors,
status,
update,
council
inquiries
and
motions
for
the
period
ending
18th,
March
2016,
received
committee
reports,
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report
number
13,
appalled
in
the
middle
cries.
Negative
Cotuit
is
a
febrile
zoning,
bylaw
amendment
537,
one
boundary
Road
and
part
of
532
9
5
3
4,
1,
&,
5,
3,
8,
3,
boundary
road
carried
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report
number
10,
the
parks,
recreation
and
cultural
services,
allocation
policy,
refresh
arenas,
sports
fields
and
ball
diamonds.
E
A
J
Written
by
staff,
so
it
follows
the
direction
given
to
committee
circles
as
follow
it's
basically
mr.
mayor,
if
you're,
okay
with
summarizing,
it
basically
allows
so
in
the
report.
It
rides
five
percent
if
there
are
change
in
participation
rates
from
year
to
year,
up
or
down,
and
that
committee
I
had
initially
spoke
of
thirty
percent.
This
motion
is
more
reflective
of
this
discussion.
E
K
L
Mayor
the
motion
before
you
from
council
flurry
recommends
the
the
increase
of
a
five
percent
from
five
percent
recommended
in
the
report
to
ten
percent
in
terms
of
delegated
authority
to
staff
in
the
year
after
the
adjustments
that
will
be
made
as
part
of
the
recommendations
of
this
report
staff.
We're
recommending
that,
in
order
to
take
into
account
new
emerging
needs,
either
growth
and
existing
sports
or
new
emerging
sports.
L
That
might
come
to
us
for
allocation
that
we
have
the
to
take
up
to
5%
of
the
existing
envelope
of
time
and
dedicated
towards
meeting
those
new
reads.
The
motion
before
you
would
increase
that
to
10%
staff
consulted
on
5%.
That
was
the
number
that
was
circulated
to
the
community,
both
as
part
of
the
2010
consultation
to
the
community
and
then
the
2015
consultation
as
well,
and
we
use
that
number,
because
we
thought
that,
after
a
year
of
major
adjustments,
which
will
be
the
year
that's
coming
up.
L
If
council
approves
this
report,
the
Rebbe
in
need
for
some
stability
for
groups
in
order
to
adjust
to
the
new
reality
of
whatever
their
allocation
might
be.
When
staff
looked
at
it,
we
thought
that
5%
would
suffice
in
order
for
us
to
make
most
adjustments
by
way
of
the
tops
understanding
what
5%
means
in
the
context
of
arenas
that
would
mean
about
the
bay
to
handle
about
a
thousand
new
participants.
E
Obviously,
going
to
be
a
bigger
issue,
so
we're
gonna
go
through
the
consent.
I
fandom
will
come
back
to
it,
and
this
is
a
good
example.
Counselors,
please
consult
the
chair
of
the
committee
and
the
people
who
are
on
the
sponsor
group
and
don't
bring
these
motions
for
because
it
it
does
a
disservice
to
the
people.
Who've
done
all
the
heavy
lifting
on
this
and
my
understanding
is
staff.
Don't
support
this,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
come
back
to
that
next.
E
M
M
If
you
happen
to
infer
the
array
you
live
in,
because
your
Beach
was
closed.
So
we
met
in
the
interim
and
I
again.
I
want
to
thank
the
NJEA
and
his
and
his
team
for
coming
up
with
a
proposal
that
stays
within
the
existing
budget
increases
Beach
time
way
across
the
city
in
a
consistent
way,
which
is
something
that
we
heard
from
residents
while
some
way
that
they
mad
at
the
beaches
open
the
longer
it's
kind
of
ironic
they're.
M
Voting
on
this
is
you're
still
snow
on
the
ground
or
expecting
the
stamp
tomorrow,
but
maybe
that's
all
the
may
reason
to
support
this
initiative
and
get
everybody
into
the
spring
summer
mode
of
thinking
so
again,
I
think
it's
it's
a
it's
a
good
news
story.
It
stays
within
budget.
It
keeps
residence
what
they
asked
for
last
year
or
beach
time
for
families
and
I've
worked
for
support
on
this
motion.
Thank
you
very
much.
M
E
Carried
great
thank
you
and
on
the
report
is
amended
carried
next
is
fedko
report
number
11,
B,
semi
assembly,
annual
performance
report
to
Council
20,
q2,
2015
and
q3
2015
carried
an
item
number
six
disposition
of
2015
tax
and
rates
supported
operating
surplus
deficit
deficit,
carried
item;
seven
downtown
Rito,
Business,
Improvement
area,
boundary
adjustment;
I
believe
we
have
motion.
So
there
may
be
some
discussion
on
this.
So
maybe
we'll
just
come
back
to
that
as
an
item
that
will
take
a
little
longer.
E
F
F
That
council
approved
the
following
amendments
to
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
61
11
at
60,
141
Hazeldine,
Road
report
number
AS
ACS
to
zero
one,
six,
that
the
residents
had
asked
for
some
changes
to
the
unit's
backing
on
the
existing
units
in
the
area
to
reflect
the
existing
units,
and
that
meant
basically
to
change
some
density
units
into
single-family
homes
and
the
based
on
that
necessity.
There
are
some
recommendation
for
this
motion
to
be
changed
in
terms
of
technical.
F
Now,
item
number
one:
the
document
won't
be
replaced
with
the
zoning
key
plan
attached
to
this
motion
and
to
that
item
one
of
the
document
to
detail
recommend
is
owning
Viva
place
for
the
following
reason:
the
subject
line
shown
on
document
1
as
follows,
and
there's
you
know
a
whole
bunch
of
characters
there
in
area
a
from
development
reserved
201
area
B
from
D
r2
r3.
Why?
Why
exception
a
SC
from
am
nine
two
one?
Six:
nine,
nine
and
a
game
with
exceptions
and
area
D
from
deed
development
reserved
to
our
x1
and.
E
E
E
By
councillor,
leaper
planning
committee
report
number
23,
a
2015
annual
report
pursuant
to
the
building
code
act
and
a
recommendation
to
reduce
Building
Code
fees
carried
nice
staff
with
a
good
work
on
the
review.
Zoning
bylaw
amendment
101
and
105
Champaign
Avenue
South
carried
item
number
12,
building
better,
revitalize
neighborhoods
phase
2
initiation
carried.
Thank
you
to
everyone
involved
in
that
process.
E
E
L
L
Original
recommendation
of
five
percent
I
think
was
sufficient
in
terms
of
annual
adjustments,
and
there
will
be
four
of
those
in
a
cycle
of
allocation
one
each
year,
but
if
it's
ten
percent,
then
we
would
simply
use
discretion
to
keep
the
adjustments
reasonable,
which
was
our
commitment
during
consultation
with
the
user
groups,
that
we
would
allow
them
some
time
to
stabilize
between
adjustments.
I.
L
K
You
mr.
mayor
and
again,
I
think
that
everyone
could
tell
when
this
motion
came
before
us,
that
we
were
very
surprised,
especially
those
of
us
I'm,
looking
at
my
colleague
to
my
right
and
looking
at
councilor
tyranny
who
were
and
a
couple
of
others
that
were
part
of
the
sponsor
group
that
worked
very
hard
on
this.
This
was
a
very
difficult
file
and
it
wasn't
enviable
to
be
on
the
sponsor
group
in
the
first
place,
because
we
knew
that
there
would
be
a
lot
of
pushback
from
all
of
the
sports
organizations,
both
in
any
season.
K
K
K
I
would
recommend,
if
that's
how
the
will
of
Council
that
we
actually
go
back
to
the
public
and
we
consult
them
again
on
it,
because
it
was
very
difficult
and
we've
and
and
miss
charlie
can
go
into
more
detail
on
that
and
it's
not
right
and
it
actually
defeats
the
purpose
of
the
sponsor
group,
especially
when
the
sponsor
group
people
around
the
table.
Don't
even
know
that
this
is
coming.
K
I
understand
that
there
was
discussion
that
committee
about
the
possibility
that
there's
been
nothing
in
between
that,
and
certainly
the
people
who
are
our
users
and
who
we
support
with
our
sports
programs
and
our
facilities
are
not
expecting
just
like.
We
were
not
expecting
it
so
I'm
going
to
ask
you
please
do
not
support
this.
Okay.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Mister
ma'am
I
also
echo
Jan's
comments,
I
think
between
Jan
and
Diane
myself
and
a
few
others
that
are
around
the
table.
We
worked
very
closely
with
dan
and
mr.
Anglais.
On
this
and
I'll
tell
you.
There
was
some
major
changes
that
have
occurred
in
the
world
of
sports
to
benefit
our
citizens
to
make
sure
we
see
more
people
using
the
ice
using
the
fields.
At
the
same
time,
we
did
that
it
took
out
a
legacy
aspect
that
we
had
to
field.
We
had
to
have
local
groups
in
our
communities.
A
Coming
to
us
saying:
oh,
it's
legacy.
We
should
be
able
to
use
this.
We
had
to
take
all
that
burden
on.
We
had
countless
meetings
and
we
actually
got
back
to
the
community
and
came
to
consensus
to
be
able
to
make
this
so
it's
sustainable
in
the
future.
So
people
have
access
to
these
fields
to
these
rinks
and
now
to
go
change.
A
Even
there
was
a
time
when
Keith
had
people
calling
his
office
and
I'm
heavily
involved
in
the
hockey
world,
where
I'd
call
him
up
and
explain
why
we're
doing
this,
why
it's
gonna
be
a
benefit
in
the
future
hours
and
hours
of
phone
calls
and
emails,
and
just
to
change
horses
last
second
I,
don't
think
we're
doing
a
service
to
ourselves.
So
thank
you.
Mister
man,
thanks.
G
Worship
when
this
was
debated
by
committee,
the
idea
coming
out
of
committee
and
that
was
sort
of
being
dealt
with
between
committee-
and
here
was
the
idea
of
going
even
further
to
30%,
which
I
think
would
create
a
significant
problem.
But
one
of
the
more
fundamental
issues
here,
aside
from
what
the
sponsorship
sponsorship
group
did
and
and
resolve
to,
is
the
fact
that
we
are
delegating
the
policy
to
a
certain
extent
here,
and
this
is
in
in
effect,
a
decision
that
we
should
be
making.
But
by
delegating
it
with
a
margin
for
change
of
5%.
G
We're
saying:
okay,
we'll
make
a
decision
so
far,
but
unelected
bureaucrats
will
make
a
decision
to
vary
it
by
up
to
5%
I,
don't
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
variance
with
no
accountability
to
the
public
and
the
users
in
the
first
place.
But
if
we're
going
to
do
it,
5%
I
think
is
about.
As
far
as
we
should
go.
G
10%
sure
is
much
better
than
the
30
we
were
dealing
with
that
committee,
but
30
percent
variance
would
have
meant
that
we
have
virtually
no
policy
and
it's
being
made
up
on
the
fly
by
the
bureaucracy
which
may
produce
a
better
result
in
some
occasions.
But
we
are
the
ones
elected
we're
the
ones
that
are
supposed
to
make
the
decision,
so
I
will
agree
with
councilor
harder
and
support
staying
at
5%.
N
You
mr.
mayor,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
they
stop
don't
feel
they
need
10%
and
won't
use
10%,
and
we
didn't
consult
on
10%
and
I
can
tell
you
that
the
allocations
policy
has
kind
of
a
boring
name,
but
behind
that
name
has
been
a
lot
of
work.
It's
a
significant
change
in
our
approach.
It's
a
it's
a
much
more
current
change
than
our
old
approach
and
it
is
not
one
that
we
have
done
lightly.
N
But
beyond
that
it
starts
becoming
a
different
proposition
when
you
get
to
a
higher
higher
number
and
that's
why
I
don't
think
we
should
do
that
aye
aye,
very
much,
but
counselor
harder.
If
we
wanted
to
go
to
10%,
then
we
should
go
back
and
do
it
all
over
again,
because
the
reason
that
we've
gotten
to
this
point
is
because
we
did
the
homework
with
the
community
and
we've
been
trying
to
consensus,
build
and
to
change
it
on
the
floor
of
council
at
the
last
minute
is
really
not
good
faith.
N
A
A
J
A
A
I
L
Mr.
mayor,
the
recommendation
in
front
of
you
specifically
anticipated
that
once
we
make
the
change
this
year
and
apply
the
new
process
that
sets
aside
historical,
that
there
be
a
process
every
year
to
avoid
getting
back
into
the
same
into
the
same
trap,
and
so
the
5%
as
I
said
earlier,
even
though
it
sounds
like
a
small
percentage,
actually
equates
to
a
significant
amount
of
hours
that
the
city
has
the
ability
to
transfer
in
each
year
of
the
four
years
before
we
do
it
all
again
in
year.
Five.
L
So
if
you're
paving
today
is
that
for
this
year,
we
will
write
to
stay
clean.
We
do
the
allocations
based
on
the
formula.
We
will
have
five
percent
leeway
in
the
our
silos
of
each
of
our
types
of
facilities
and
then
in
year,
five,
even
if
there
is
a
bit
of
a
fall
back
and
we
don't
believe
there
will
be-
we
believe
there's
sufficient
hours
near
five-
takes
care
of
that
and
resets
the
clock
again
and.
I
L
E
J
Knab
III
feel
very,
very
sad
today,
I
have
to
say
for
the
members
who
were
now
that
committee
we
had
this
discussion.
We
had
a
fairly
fulsome
discussion
and,
as
highlighted
by
a
counselor
le
I
started
with
the
discussion
around
30%
and
everyone
around
the
table
said
you
know,
Matt
30%
is
going
way
too
far.
J
Maybe
we
should
reconsider
to
a
number
that
and
committee
at
the
time
was
willing
to
go
down
to
10%
on
the
spot,
but
as
we
gave
direction
to
staff
on
other
items
which
are
included
this
report,
they
also
highlight
the
playoffs
playoff
discussion.
They
highlight
also
how
we
track
how
the
information
is
provided
by
the
teams.
J
Those
are
all
amendment
amendments
that
came
in
as
from
committee,
my
direction
to
staff
fit
into
that
process,
but
unfortunately
there
was
a
clerk
error
that
didn't
carry
it
to
today's
Council,
so
it
appears
as
it's
a
standalone
motion
and
I
understand
for
members
who
were
not
part
of
the
discussion
at
committee.
You'd
say:
what's
flurry
doing
he's
just
bringing
a
motion,
but
to
be
clear.
This
was
four
members
that
were
at
committee.
They
can
reflect
and
say
hey.
This
was
discussed.
J
We
gave
a
direction
to
staff,
unfortunately,
from
from
committee
to
Council
it
wasn't
carried
over
I
just
want
to
correct
one
element.
The
only
reason
why
I'm
bringing
this
percentage
up
is
to
so
that
we
don't
reach
an
historical
hitch
and
an
issue.
We
have
growth
and
we
have
drops
in
sports
and
we
as
council
shouldn't
were
there.
It
should
just
be
an
automatic
allocation
and
staff
should
be
entitled
to
review.
J
For
example,
if
figure-skating
increases
a
thousand
percent
in
participation
when
ice
is
giving
out
the
next
year,
it
should
be
reflected
in
the
overall
allocation.
It
shouldn't
have
an
impact,
a
political
decision
on
and
and
I
understand
that
there's
a
big
risk
if
we
go
to
30%,
but
I
thought
that
up
to
10%,
if
there's
a
huge
growth
in
sport-
and
that
applies
not
only
to
ice,
it
also
applies
to
field.
So
that's
the
reason
why
you
have
the
motion
in
front
of
you
today.
It's
reflective
of
the
discussion.
J
Remember
we
started
off
at
30
and
I
was
part
of
the
sponsors
group.
I
think
there's
great
work.
That
was
done
as
part
of
this
report.
It's
a
great
step
in
the
right
direction.
It
doesn't
set
the
it
really
corrects
the
issue
that
we
had
in
terms
of
the
historical
allocation,
the
unfair
advantage
that
male
hockey
teams
have,
in
this
case
over
women's
hockey
teams,
but
it
applies
across
different
sports
categories.
J
So
that's
the
reason
why
you
have
this
in
front
of
you
if,
if
council
doesn't
support
it,
it's
fine
but
I
just
want
I'm
a
huge
sport
advocate
my
masters
in
sport
management
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
concerned
that
were
just
reestablishing
a
new
historical
baseline.
That
is
my
concern
and
that's
why
I
brought
that
at
committee
as
a
direction,
and
it's
unfortunate
that
it
it
wasn't
reflected
and
now
that
I
have
to
bring
it
in
a
motion.
Format.
Okay,.
E
B
A
C
L
H
E
E
On
the
main
report,
as
printed
on
page
five
of
your
council
agenda
carried.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
held
was
the
Downtown
Rito
Business,
Improvement
area,
boundary
adjustment
and
councilor
flurry
and
councilor
McKenney
I.
Thank
them
because
they
worked
the
last
couple
of
weeks
as
a
result
of
the
concerns.
A
number
of
us
heard
at
fedko
about
the
original
proposal
and
they've
come
up
with
a
compromise.
J
J
Without
the
knowledge
of
the
councillor
of
the
ward
and
whereas
the
downtown
Reno
BIA
has
notified
the
director
of
the
downtown
Museum
of
the
financial
implication
to
joining
the
downtown
Reno
BIA
and
whereas
city
staff
has
no
concerns
with
the
revision.
To
the
proposed
downtown
reto
BIA
down
the
expansion,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
City
Council
approved
that
document.
One
proposed
bounty
adjustment
map
be
amended
to
effect.
E
Thank
you,
I
just
had
one
question
that
said
notified
the
director
I
think
you
meant
of
the
Bytown
museum
of
the
financial
implications.
My
understanding
was,
they
were
not
going
to
be
assessed.
That
is
same
with
the
NAC.
Is
that
the
case
guys
I,
don't
think
we
want
to
burden
the
the
Bytown
museum
with
a
collect.
F
First
of
all,
mr.
mayor
I'd
like
to
tell
my
both
my
colleague
for
working
together
on
this
motion,
but
I
didn't
hear
discussion.
What,
with
the
Ottawa
Council
on
BIA,
did
staff
reach
out
to
the
Ottawa
council
on
BIA
and
have
a
discussion
about
this
motion,
or
are
they
in
agreement
with
this
because
I
don't
see
anywhere
here
mentioned
the
Ottawa
Council?
On
being
a
three
mr.
mayor,
we
did.
A
F
A
F
We
heard
that
time
and
time
again
there
was
no
need
to
consult,
but
then,
when
we
meet
with
them
they
say
how
come
we
were
not
consulted.
So
please,
if,
if
you
can't
anything
to
do
BIA,
it
should
be
at
least
vented
or
shared
with
the
Ottawa
Council
BIA,
because
we
have
them,
we
work
with
them
very
well,
they
may
attend
their
meeting
and
I
think
it'll
be
helpful
to
engage
them.
We
know
how
you
know
just
let
them
know
this
is
happening.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
great.
E
E
A
A
A
Here,
I
am
concerned
that,
if
we
vote
for
this
amendment
that
we
are
setting
ourselves
up
for
consistencies
in
how
we
approach
things
like
aesthetics
and
property
values
and
and
our
planning
rationales
for
different
geographies
across
the
city,
I
would
ask
that
we
not
support
this
Thank
You.
Mr.
mayor,
thank.
K
Thanks
mr.
mayor
for
the
opportunity,
when
we
get
the
plans
of
subdivision
etc,
that
come
in,
you
know
we're
always
looking
at
the
city
for
a
certain
density.
We
know
that
we
have
a
density
that
we
have
to
achieve
and
and
in
order
to
sustain
our
urban
boundary
mr.
mayor
and
to
value
the
infrastructure
that
we
have
in
the
ground
already,
but
wherever
possible,
where
we
can
actually
keep
the
same
density,
rejigged
the
properties
so
that
we
have
that
neighbor
backing
onto
neighbor
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
Because
of
the
density.
K
For
one
thing,
you
could
end
up
with
five
different
fences
along
a
property
line,
but
where
it's
possible,
we
do
that,
and
in
this
case
we
were
able
to
achieve
compromise
with
the
developer,
who
said
yeah,
we
will
we'll
do
that
we'll
honor
those
backyards
we'll
match
them
up.
We
can
do
that
and
we
can
sustain
the
density
that
we
need
to
achieve
and
that
the
city
needs
us
to
achieve
and
that's
exactly
what
we
did
and
that's
it's
as
simple
as
that.
Thank
you.
F
F
Having
said
that,
as
counsel
Holly
mentioned
the
fact
that
in
the
community
across
the
city,
there
is
something
called
compatibility
and
that's
what
I
think
part
of
the
reason
why
this
motion
was
put
forward
along
with
the
fact
that
that's
what
the
community
wanted,
also
in
terms
of
the
two
locations
that
they've
identified
in
this
motion
so
based
on,
that
is
what
I'm
asking
for
concert.
Colleagues
to
support
this
motion,
because
it's
not
just
a
fun
facet
of
one
faceted
motion
as
it
being
described
already.
F
B
B
Condominium
directly
across
the
street
and
smack
dab
in
the
middle
of
an
existing
low-rise
single-family
detached
unit
dead-end
street.
So
you
know
aesthetics
property
value.
We
ask
we
ask
others
to
to
do
for
the
good
of
the
city
to
make
sure
that
they're
we're
intensifying
that
we're
living
near
transit
and
as
far
as
compatibility
goes,
I
agree
that
we
need
to
do
what
we
can
for
a
compatibility,
but
putting
more
people
into
a
suburban
community
is,
is
compatible
and
there's
absolutely
nothing
wrong
with
using
your
land
that
way.
B
I
Much
mr.
mayor
I
think
the
two
speakers
who
are
against
this
a
fail
to
understand
exactly
what
this
does.
It
doesn't
actually
change
the
density
of
a
neighborhood.
It
doesn't
change
how
many
units
are
going
into
that
neighborhood.
All
it
says
is
that
townhomes
should
back
onto
townhomes
and
single-family
homes
should
back
on
a
single-family
home,
so
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
changing
densities.
That
has
nothing
to
do
with
adding
more
people
to
the
suburbs.
Frankly,
this
is
about
helping
new
homeowners
in
their
quality
of
life.
I
If
you
have
a
single-family
home
backing
on
potentially
to
having
three
or
four
rear
yard,
neighbors
I've
got
two
neighbors
one.
On
each
side,
we
can't
get
together
an
organized
offense
because
we
all
have
different
views
on
the
fence.
Imagine
her
laying
seven
neighbors
to
agree
not
only
to
have
the
expense
of
the
fence,
the
same
type
of
fence.
The
whole
thing.
I
That's
just
one
example
of
why
this
is
this
is
an
important
improvement
to
make
in
these
kinds
of
communities
and
guess
what
there
is
a
difference
between
senator
town
and
the
suburbs,
and
if
we
fail
to
recognize
that
difference,
we're
gonna
be
hurting
the
quality
of
life
of
suburban
residents
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
something
that
either
those
councillors
proposes.
We
do
so
I
fully
support
this
motion
and
I
would
encourage
all
of
our
new
suburban
communities
to
articulate
this
kind
of
this
kind
of
design.
Thank
you
very
much.
L
I
share
the
exact
concerns,
as
my
urban
colleagues
but
I'm
actually
going
to
take
a
different
approach
on
this.
As
a
result,
I
have
been
at
those
meetings
where
residents
from
our
words
have
come
out
and
said.
If
we
approve
this,
it's
going
to
hurt
our
quality
of
life
and
change
the
way
the
street
in
the
neighborhood
functions
in
the
exact
same
way
as
I
have
just
heard.
L
If
you
want
to
frame
it
as
the
suburban
argument,
so
in
fact,
I'm
going
to
support
this
with
the
expectation
with
the
expectation
that,
when
the
same
argument
is
made
by
people
who
live
on
streets
that
are
fundamentally
low-rise
residential
streets,
that
they
be
granted
a
similar
form
of
protection
under
the
same
argument.
I.
It's
not
that
any
was
expecting
a
downtown
neighborhood
to
look
like
a
suburban
one,
but
I
do
believe.
L
People
who
have
bought
invested
and
lived
in
a
street
a
neighborhood
in
a
downtown
area
that
they
would
similarly
not
expect
wholesale
changes
and
like
to
feel
that
a
single
home
will
back
onto
a
single
single
home
and
that
we
really
target
the
uplift
to
specific
types
of
streets
and
corner
Lots,
etc.
So
we
won't
see
we
can
bring
out
the
pictures.
We've
had
residents
come
out
and
show
pictures
of
cases
on
residential
streets.
In
my
own
neighborhood,
where,
when
you
look
at
them,
you
go.
What
is
that
and
how
on
earth
did
that
happen?
L
E
K
You
mr.
Marin,
because
of
the
comments
that
we've
just
heard,
it's
even
more
important
that
I
give
you
a
heads
up
as
to
a
date
which
is
April
the
5th
after
fedko
about
half
an
hour
after
fedko
we're
going
to
have
a
show-and-tell
on
building
better
smarter
suburbs
and
I'm.
Clearly,
there's
a
need
for
people
who
don't
have
experience
living
in
the
suburbs
to
come
out
and
and
really
see
what
we've
been
doing
and,
of
course
connected
to
that
is
the
infrastructure
standards
review.
E
A
O
A
F
E
E
D
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
staff,
and
this
is
as
a
result
of
following
what
was
said
at
committee
and
and
comparing
to
some
of
the
points
that
were
brought
up
in
the
audit
on
this
program.
So
when
mr.
Wylie
said
so
I'll
start
so
so
the
first
of
course
I
up
for
you
is
the
same,
is
the
same
option
of
bringing
it
back
in
house
being
considered
for
tires.
O
O
The
mayor,
definitely
there
was
other
options
considered.
We
did
a
number
of
things.
We
hired
a
third-party
organization
consultant
to
look
out
the
model.
We
did
vendor
meetings
with
not
just
the
current
vendor,
but
all
different
vendors
in
the
community
and
that's
how
we
arrived
at
the
current
business
model,
which,
by
the
way,
is
not
the
same
as
the
business
model.
Prior
to
now,
it's
a
different
business
model.
O
D
O
The
mayor,
we
have
two
main
performance
measurements
that
we
track.
One
is
our
down
time,
so
we
want
to
see
our
down
time
of
our
fleet
improve
and
we
think
it
we're
confident.
It
will,
because
they'll
be
a
much
more
effective
and
efficient
way
of
getting
parts.
And
then
the
measure
me
we'll
be
taking
a
look
at
is
how
the
part
prices
come
in
when
we
tend
it
out
for
the
parts.
What.
O
D
We
opted
to
contract
out
the
parts.
Did
we
not
create
six
positions
to
manage
that
contract
and
to
manage
the
parts
inside
I
thought
there
was
something
under
the
service
Ottawa
piece
that
there
was
jobs
that
were
going
to
be
taken
off
the
book
or
redistributed
elsewhere.
But
there
was
some
new
positions
being
created
to
manage
this
through.
O
D
D
The
City
of
Toronto
and
other
municipalities
have
a
practice
management
contract
and
from
what
we
were
able
to
see
in
their
proposals.
They
we're
following
what
the
City
of
Ottawa
was
doing
in
2011
and
and
based
their
proposals
on
ours,
Toronto
just
renewed
theirs.
How
come
they're
having
success
and
we're
not.
O
D
Thank
you
and
my
last
question
is
curious
as
to
why
it
took
an
audit
of
this
program
that
came
in
in
2011
why
it
took
the
audit
to
point
out
that
there
was
problems
here
and
now,
with
only
a
month
or
two
left
in
the
contract
were
scrambling
to
to
fix
things
here.
I
I'm
concerned
with
the
management
of
the
contract
over
the
time
legal
had
put
certain
performance
measures
into
that
contract
penalties
were,
could
have
been
applied.
D
O
Mayor
we
have
been
working
with
Knapp
the
lenders
since
the
inception
of
this
contract,
trying
to
make
the
contract
work
and
it's
been
a
long
process.
I
agree,
we've
also
been
working
on
and
we
had
a
contract
for
a
set
date
that
that
contract
is
up
come
this
summer.
So
we
were,
while
working
with
the
contractor,
to
try
and
make
the
contract
work,
we're
also
getting
prepared
for
the
end
of
the
contract
and
that's
what
this
report
is
representing.
So.
O
I
think
I
can
assure
you
on
this
Napa
contract
that
we
help
their
feet
to
the
fire.
We
work
very
closely
with
our
procurement
colleagues
and
our
legal
colleagues
to
ensure
that
all
the
provisions
are
in
place
and
procurement
is
a
very,
very
big
help
in
making
sure
that
those
contract
provisions
are
followed
as
our
staff.
Okay,.
E
B
Yes,
a
machine
man,
just
a
couple
of
follow-up
questions,
general
manager,
Wiley
to
to
my
colleagues
questions.
You
mentioned
two
key
performance
indicators.
Downtime
part
prices.
To
what
extent
will
you
cut?
Please
tell
me
that
the
the
entire
program
cost
will
be
a
key
performance
indicator
that
this
will
end
up
costing
us
less
than
the
current
system.
Mr.
O
O
B
O
B
O
The
auditor
pointed
out,
mr.
mayor
that,
although
fleet
transformation
did
result
in
about
a
3.9
million
dollar
savings
and
12ft
the
organization,
the
parts
component,
which
is
part
of
the
transformation,
did
end
up
costing
us
more
in
in
parts
primarily
because
of
the
markup
that
defender
required
in
the
contract.
O
O
The
vendor
is
that
their
part
system,
their
inventory
system,
had
to
talk
to
our
inventory
system
and
we
both
tried
to
make
that
work
over
the
life
of
the
contract,
but
we
couldn't
make
it
work
and
that's
what
led
to
the
delay
in
some
parts.
So
that
was
one
of
the
big
problems.
With
this
new
model,
the
parts
will
be
coming
right
into
our
inventory
system.
Those
will
be
accessed
easily
by
our
mechanics.
B
O
B
O
B
B
O
F
A
This
regard
to
the
legal
question
that
you
posed
as
a
result
of
the
current
supplier
not
being
prepared
to
renew
the
agreement
under
the
current
terms
and
conditions,
as
is
provided
in
this
agreement,
the
risk,
if
this
report
was
not
approved,
is
that
come
the
middle
of
July.
We
would
not
have
another
supplier.
B
A
The
initial
contract
was
five
years
from
2011
until
the
middle
of
July
of
this
year.
The
contract
contained
a
provision
which
would
allow
it
to
be
extended
by
a
further
four
years.
However,
also
within
the
contract
it
provided
that
that
extension
would
have
to
be
under
the
same
terms
and
conditions
as
the
initial
contract,
as
the
general
manager
has
I
think
indicated,
the
current
provider
was
not
prepared
to
renew
the
contract
under
that
basis,
and
that's.
G
O
I
I
O
I
O
I
Except
for,
of
course,
Fed
Cohen
Council
has
passed
a
requirement
that
business
cases
be
done
for
large
procurements,
even
small
procurements,
so
I'm
just
wondering
why
that
information
wasn't
part
of
the
package
of
documents
present
to
that
committee.
If
the
work
was
done,
why
wasn't
it
presents
it
as
part
of
the
package.
I
I'm
done
with
my
questions,
mr.
deputy
mayor,
but
you
know
we
can
only
go.
We
had
a
business
case.
That
said
it
was
a
good
idea
to
go
outside
now.
We've
got
a
business
case
that
says
it's
a
good
idea
to
come
inside.
Neither
one
of
them
has
been
shared
with
Council,
yet
we
have
direction
from
this
council
to
have
business
cases
for
procurement
and
for
that
information
to
be
made
available
to
councilors,
and
it
wasn't
I
feel
very
uncomfortable,
supporting
this
and
I
feel
uncomfortable.
I
G
Thank
you
very
much
councilor.
So
with
no
more
speakers
and
in
the
absence
of
emotion
of
councillor
Blay,
you
can
certainly
not
support
the
recommendation.
If
you
want
the
recommendation,
that's
before
us
carried
dissent
by
council,
a
dissent
by
councillor,
hubely
and
carried
with
those
dissents
noted.
Thank
you
very
much.
The
next
item
is
the
item.
Number
16,
Business
Improvement
area
anti
graffiti
grant
program
motion.
This
was
held
by
councillor
Hugh
bleak,
as
there
hubely
had
questions.
D
Thank
You
mr.
deputy
mayor
I,
just
want
to
we
had
a
previous
motion.
I
think
it's
two
years
ago
came
through
fedcon
to
council
that
on
cases
like
this,
where
we're
dealing
with
the
BIA
s
that
we
would
also
involve
the
Chamber
of
Commerce's
and
the
board
of
trades
I.
Don't
see
that
in
this
motion
here
so
I
believe
we're
okay
to
have
this
as
a
friendly
amendment.
D
E
Every
time
did
we
raise
this
with
me,
I
recall,
just
a
couple
days
ago,
I'm
wondering
we
did
indicate
there
a
number
of
areas
of
the
city
that
don't
have
BIA
s,
but
they
have
boards
of
trades
and
chambers
of
commerce.
So
can
we
ensure
that
information
on
this
program?
You
know
a
deputy
clerk
saying
we
should
add
it
formally
to
the
motion.
So
if
you
want
it,
maybe
the
clerk
can
give
us
some
wording.
E
We
just
hold
for
a
minute
counselor,
but
I
think
maybe
to
our
acting
city
manager,
just
remind
senior
staff
that
the
motion
that
councilor
hubely
raised
and
other
members
of
council
with
respect
to
boards
of
trade
chambers
of
commerce
when
something
like
this
comes
about.
If
we
could
notify
those
groups
in
the
public
consultation
process
because
they
don't
have
formal
BIA
s,.
E
F
D
My
second
question,
mr.
mayor:
go
to
it
or
okay
go
ahead.
The
second
question
is:
there's
an
option.
One
option
two
in
this
report:
I
have
concerns
with
the
recommended
option,
because
it
doesn't
allow
us
to
track
that
the
money
is
also
being
spent
on
what
we
give
it
to
them
for
and
I
would
like
to
have
something
that
we
tax
payer
will
know
that
the
money
that
we
give
them
is
going
towards
the
antic,
greedy
being
spent
and
I
believe
counsel.
K
Just
wanted
clarification
because
we
have
it's
not
a
lot
of
money,
but
it's
important
money
that
the
BI
is
get
so
this
says
the
remaining
money.
That's
left.
Would
that
mean
that
the
groups
that
we
are
adding
to
would
wait
till
the
end
of
the
year
to
see
what
was
available
I'm
just
wondering,
or
would
you
have
to
divvy
up
the
pie,
so
there'd
be
less
money
available
to
the
ones
that
have
benefited
from
this
over
the
previous
years?.
O
Mr.
mayor,
the
money
would
be
allocated
on
average
a
five
year
average
basis,
so
the
spending
pattern
individual
BIA
is
over
the
last
five
years.
That's
the
money
that
would
be
allocated.
There
would
be
a
contingency
put
aside.
So
if
anyone
BIA
had
a
bad
year
in
graffiti
and
had
to
spend
more
there'd,
be
money
available
for
that
BIA
I
guess.
K
My
question
is:
we
have
a
set
amount
of
money
in
the
pot
that
we
dispersed
money
from.
What's
the
impact
on
that
going
to
be,
if
we
start
adding
we're,
adding
and
I'm
not
opposed
to
adding
these
different
groups
by
the
way
I
mean
I've,
there
may
not
be
as
much
graffiti
and
councillor
oozes
Ward
as
there
is
in
councilor
leapers
or
councillor
McKenna's,
but
the
fact
is
to
have
an
association
there
that
can
benefit,
but
they
don't
have
the
same
need
as
as
they
do
just
like.
K
Bar
Haven
doesn't
have
the
same
need
as
you
do
either
it's
just
the
way
it
is
so
we
add,
if
we're,
adding,
potentially
five
or
more.
What's
that
going
to
do
with
to
the
original
pot
and
again,
are
you
going
to
have
to
wait
until
all
the
all
the
first
users
are,
the
ones
that
have
been
traditionally
supported,
take
their
piece
of
it
and
we
understand
if
they
have
more
needs
and
then
later
on
in
the
year
you're
going
to
be
able
to
give
them
otherwise
I
see
it
as
being
a
question
for
budget
on.
K
K
O
O
K
Maybe
we
we
do
have
to
consider
this
a
budget
and
I
would
I
would
suggest
that
the
ones
that
we
would
add
or
consider
adding
would
they
we
need
to
understand
what
their
needs
are
too
before
our
budget,
we're
not
that
far
away
from
that
consideration,
anyways,
but
I
think
that
it's
important
to
do
it,
because
mr.
mayor
edge,
as
you
know
like
every
year,
there's
there's
a
group
of
us
that
would
love
to
add
adult
crossing
guards,
but
it
doesn't
mean
we
can
afford
to
do
it.
E
Yeah
I
I
think
perhaps
the
simplest
suggestion
is
that
after
year,
one
when
we've
gone
through
one
full
year,
we
asked
staff
to
bring
back
a
report
to
Transportation
Committee
to
see
how
it
worked
out
because
I
think
we're
in
uncharted
waters
because
we've
never,
you
know
both
VI
A's
generally
have
well.
They
always
have
a
geographic
area
that
they
cover.
E
It's
specific,
it's
known,
it's
usually
retail
component,
and
you
know,
boards
of
trades
in
chambers
of
commerce
may
not
be
set
up
to
do
the
kind
of
work
that
a
BIA
does,
but
at
least
give
them
a
chance
to
potentially
seek
funds
for
graffiti,
because
there's
graffiti
in
every
part
of
the
city,
unfortunately
so
I
think
it
would
make
the
most
sense.
Mr.
E
Wylie,
that
after
one
full
year
that
you
come
back
to
Transportation
Committee
to
see
how
well
the
project
is
working
and
how
you
know
if
other
groups
have
come
in
and
saw
it
funds
just
to
see
if
we
need
to
add
more
to
the
budget,
it's
not
reasonable.
Absolutely!
Mr.
mayor
okay,
so
we
have
two
people
that
still
wish
to
speak
to
this
councillor.
Mishchenko.
L
Yes,
thank
you
more
just
a
comment
from
staff
about
the
yeas
have
a
certain
kind
of
a
status
and
they
are
a
designated
authority
with
bank
accountant,
the
sort
of
recognized
status,
provincially
and,
and
municipal
II
I'm
wondering
if
extending
this
to
other
groups,
not
that
I
have
any
objection
to
extending
it
to
other
parts
of
the
city
that
would
be
affected,
but
whether
there's
a
fundamental
difference
in
terms
of
reporting
of
how
that
money
is
spent,
that
it
makes
this
problematic,
if
not
I,
can
support
it.
But
had
that
concern.
O
G
L
Didn't
get
an
answer,
because
mr.
Bashir
isn't
here
so
III
would
just
raise
that
concern.
I
would
I
would
assume
that
we
would
have
certain
sort
of
status
rules
of
groups
to
which
we
can
issue
money
and
that
we'd
need
to
ensure
that
outside
of
eligible
BIA
s,
that
the
tracking
of
the
money
and
the
reporting
system
is
there.
That's
part
of
our
own
financial
management.
O
G
Thank
your
worship
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
staff,
when
they
deal
with
this
in
the
upcoming
year,
assuming
it
passes,
is
going
to
be
well
aware
of
the
fact
that
when
it
comes
to
eliminating
graffiti
speed
equals
success.
So
there
are
some
areas
of
the
city
that
have
more
graffiti
simply
because
they
don't
remove
it
quickly
enough
and
the
slowness
in
removing
graffiti
encourages
more
and
more
graffiti
and
I
look
at
Bell's
corners.
It
has
a
policy
of
the
second.
It
goes
up.
G
A
O
J
J
J
D
You
mr.
mayor
just
two
pieces
of
information
come
up
that
I'd
like
to
ask
about
mr.
Wylie
said
he's
going
to
use
the
five-year
previous
spending
average.
Do
we
have
some
way
of
knowing
that
that
money
was
also
spent,
or
is
it
just
some
money
being
handed
over
because
you
could
say
we've
given
somebody
ten
thousand
a
year,
but
we
don't
know
that
they
spent
the
ten
thousand
on
what
we
asked
them
to
do.
Mr.
mayor,
it's
the
actuals.
Okay.
Thank
you
then.
That's
the
other
point,
mr.
D
mayor
is
the
issue
about
including
the
other
oops.
It
was
an
oversight
in
the
original
motion,
because
we've
already
approved
this
two
years
ago
to
include
these
groups
in
these
types
of
programs
and
consultations
until
they
formalize
their
status
more
of
a
BIA
but
they're,
certainly
groups
out
there
that
we
do
do
partnerships
or
grants
with
to
to
get
this
done.
So.
Thank
you,
mr.
Mack.
Thank.
E
You
so
on
councillor
hubely,
saying
if
I
counselor
oozes
motion,
that's
on
the
screen
amendment
carried
and
on
the
main
report
as
amended
Gerry.
Thank
you
very
much
disposition
of
items
approved
by
committees
under
delegated
authority
carried
motion
to
adopt
a
reports.
Councillor
Brockington
sang
on
my
counsellor
Libra.
Please.
E
G
Shh,
thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
this.
This
was
a
motion
introduced
as
a
notice
of
last
council.
It's
on
your
screens,
I
won't
read
all
of
the
warehouses.
Essentially,
we
had
made
the
case,
as
many
municipalities
did,
to
the
province
of
Ontario,
to
allow
our
municipality
to
adopt
the
prudent
investor
standard
which
would
allow
us
to
well,
while
still
stewarding
the
tax
money
that
we're
responsible
for
working
with
well.
G
It
would
also
allow
us
to
invest
a
little
more
wisely,
a
little
more
flexibly
so
that
we
could
stretch
it
perhaps
a
little,
for
we
received
a
request
from
the
association
of
municipalities
of
Ontario
to
support
their
request
to
the
province.
So
this
motion
essentially
does
that
it
reiterates
our
own
request
as
the
City
of
Ottawa
and
supports
the
association
of
municipalities
of
Ontario.
G
That,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
is
that
City
Council
through
the
mayor
formally
expressed
the
City
of
Ottawa
support
of
the
request
of
the
association
of
municipalities
of
Ontario,
the
local
authority
services
and
the
municipal
finance
Officers
Association
of
Ontario
to
amend
Ontario
regulation,
438
97,
as
amended
of
Municipal
Act
2001,
to
allow
municipalities
to
invest
consistent
with
the
prudent
investor
standard
if
those
investments
are
professionally
managed
and
part
of
a
broader
investment
strategy
which
includes
the
one
investment
program.
Thank
you
so.
E
H
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
community
safety,
particularly
the
issue
of
speeding
vehicles
in
or
near
residential
communities,
is
the
number
one
safety
issue
in
River,
Ward
and
prevalent
across
the
city,
and
while
other
issues
exist,
we've
heard
about
guns
and
gangs,
drug
dealing,
prostitution,
the
severity
and
frequency
of
these
matters
pale
in
comparison
to
excessive
speeding
in
our
communities.
Chief
bordello,
the
auto
police
services
has
made
speed
and
traffic
enforcement
one
of
his
top
three
priorities.
H
Mara
Watson
has
identified
speed
enforcement
and
traffic
calming
as
a
major
focus
in
our
city
and
council
identified
the
need
for
traffic
calming
measures
to
be
resourced
and
made
it
a
strategic
priority
for
this
term
of
council
when
I
speak
and
are
attend
public
events
in
my
ward,
community
associations,
church
groups,
day
care
school
councils,
small
businesses
or
individuals.
The
common
theme
I
hear
where
there
was
a
school
trustee
when
I
door
knock
during
the
election
when
I
visited
every
business
last
year.
H
What
your
time
and
time
again
is
the
need
to
slow
traffic
down,
particularly
in
residential
communities.
Vehicles
are
moving
too
fast
and
they're,
threatening
the
safety
and
security
of
everyday
people
who
want
to
be
able
to
walk
jog.
Take
the
dog
out
play
with
the
kids,
buy
a
core
even
drive
their
own
vehicle
without
fear
of
injury
and
their
streets.
In
my
ward,
where
people
have
told
me
they
will
not
walk
where
cyclists
have
told
me,
they
will
not
cycle
for
fear
of
their
own
personal
safety.
Is
this
the
community
that
we
want?
H
Is
this
the
city
that
we
want?
If
we
agree
there
is
a
speeding
issue,
we
need
to
consider
all
options,
as
councilor
I've
attempted
to
employ
various
methods
to
address
the
concerns
that
are
raised.
In
some
cases,
speed
and
volume
tests
are
done
to
1st
justify.
If
there's
a
problem
residents
are
encouraged
to
complete
them,
make
the
right
call
online
reporting
tool
of
the
o-p-s
to
alert
them
of
matters
that
require
their
intention
and
enforcement.
H
I've
also
worked
a
great
length
of
Public
Works
staff
to
discuss
and
debate
the
merits
of
potential
traffic,
calming
initiatives
and
I've
held
public
consultation
and
select
neighborhoods
to
openly
and
transparently
detail.
The
proposed
plans
for
some
streets
seek
input
and
feedback
and
conduct
pilots
to
measure
success.
I
don't
proceed
on
whims,
I
study.
The
issue
determine
what
the
problem
is,
consider
multiple
options
and
make
decisions
on
what
the
best
way
will
be
to
improve
public
safety.
H
So
why
request
from
the
province
the
use
of
photo
radar
photo
radar
will
expand
the
options
available
to
the
city,
it
isn't
the
Silver
Bullet
and,
like
every
other,
calming
measure
used
in
the
city
I,
don't
envision
its
widespread
use,
I
envision.
It's
used
on
select
streets
where
other
measures
have
been
tried
with
limited
to
no
success
and
our
own
streets,
where
the
o-p-s
simply
have
inadequate
resources
to
provide
any
continuous
speed
enforcement
presence.
For
those
who
argue
that
photo
radar
is
nothing
more
than
a
money
grab.
H
I
believe
their
concerns
are
partially
real
and
justified.
It
never
was,
nor
will
be
my
intent
to
use
this
measure
to
fill
Ottawa's
coffers,
but
there
are
some
jurisdictions
who
use
photo
radar
in
excess
if
permission
is
granted
and
if
counsel
ultimately
agrees
to
proceed
with
photo
radar,
I
believe
criteria
will
need
to
be
developed
openly
with
public
consultation
on
locations.
Why
it's
required.
What
calming
measures
were
previously
tried,
the
signage
that
will
be
employed
in
neighborhoods
at
what
speed
over
the
limit
will
the
radar
be
activated
and
the
annual
reporting
of
statistics?
Mr.
H
mayor,
my
photo
radar
is
not
my
first
choice
to
enforce
speed
in
Ottawa,
but
the
fact
remains
that
speed
is
a
major
concern
and
a
major
issue
on
some
streets.
Other
calming
methods
are
ineffective
and
police.
Plett
presence
is
rarer.
Over
the
last
month,
I
forced
the
city
to
come
to
grips
with
a
chronic
issue.
Are
we
now
prepared
to
admit
we
have
a
speeding
problem,
and
if
so,
are
we
prepared
to
ask
the
province
for
permission
to
consider
this
as
an
opportunity
in
our
city?
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
You
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I'm,
going
to
put
forward
a
motion
setting
it
by
councillor
Wilkinson
that
this
issue
be
referred
to
the
Transportation
Committee
for
the
meeting
of
May.
The
4th,
2016
and
I'll
explain
I
think
that's
that's
a
reasonable
way
to
to
they
had
on
this.
We
all
know
that
Florida
radar
is
potentially
not
potentially,
it
is
a
divisive
issue
in
communities.
M
M
The
public
this
motion,
leapfrogged
committee,
went
straight
to
Council
and
allowed
no
opportunity
for
that
discussion
to
take
place,
no
opportunity
for
public
delegations
to
come
forward
and
tell
us
why
they
want
for
the
radar
how
they
want
for
the
radar
or
what
they
don't
want
photo
radar
and
why
they
don't
want
for
the
radar.
There
are
arguments
on
both
sides
of
this
and
I
think
to
make
a
significant
change
like
this.
In
terms
of
how
we
enforce
our
streets
I,
don't
disagree
with
councilor
Washington
that
speeding
was
an
issue.
M
I
think
everybody
around
this
table
would
agree.
The
speeding
is
an
issue
in
our
wards
and
in
a
perfect
world
we
would
have
enough
police
resources
to
deal
with
that.
That's
not
happening
for
a
variety
of
reasons
and
that's
just
a
statement.
It's
not
it's
not
a
negative
comment
anyway,
but
it's
not
happening
as
chair
transportation.
That
I
believe
it's
very
important
that
we
have
this
discussion.
M
Let's
make
a
reasoned,
informed
and
collaborative
decision
with
our
communities
as
to
how
we
go
forward
on
this
and
I
believe
this
position
is
also
or
I'm,
not
going
rather
position
raised
by
some
of
the
local
MPs
in
the
media.
Recently
that
indicated
that
you
know
public
consultation
on
this
is
an
important
component
and
and
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
Important
public
consultation
is
possibly
the
most
important
component
before
we
move
forward
on
an
initiative
such
as
this
again
I
think,
subject
wise
it.
M
M
E
Right,
thank
you.
So,
as
you
know,
a
motion
to
refer
takes
precedence
or
the
debate
on
photo
radar
is
not
the
time
now.
This
is
to
debate
the
merits
of
referring.
So
if
you
don't
want
to
speak
to
refer,
if
you
can
take
your
name
on
the
list,
if
you
do
want
to
councillor
wilkinson
just
on
referral,
please
Thank.
B
F
Come
sir
mayor
I
just
want
to
echo
what
councillor
eagle-eye
is
bringing
to
the
table.
It's
very
important.
This
is
go
to
committee
because
there
is
a
lots
of
unanswered
and
it
we
need
to
give
the
public
a
time
to
understand
and
we
need
to
understand
what
we're
asking
and
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
with
this.
Yes,
we
do
agree
that
we
have
a
timing.
We
do
have
a
speeding
issue
in
our
community,
but
what
our
strategy,
strategic
initiative
and
initiative
that
we
are
right
now
to
come,
do
calming
measures
in
our.
F
K
Mary
I'm
just
wondering
what
it
is:
we're
deferring,
because
I
thought
that
what
we
were
talking
about
today
was
just
asking
the
province
whether
or
not
they
would
allow
us
or
consider
allowing
us
having
the
right
I
thought.
That
was
what
we
were.
What
the
motion
was
so
this
to
me
is
something
entirely
different:
I
think,
because
we're
not
and
we're
not
suggesting
our
I
guess,
the
question
is:
if
we
vote
for
deferral,
are
we
deferring
the
the
qiat
of
the
motion?
Because,
if
we're
deferring
the
motion,
the
motion
isn't
what
counts?
E
K
N
Because
the
councillor
harder
just
raise
that
issue,
I
just
wanted
to
reinforce
what
councillor
ergo
I
said,
and
this
is
a
when
Celso
Brockington
put
this
motion
on
the
notice
of
motion
on
the
agenda
actually
sent
out
to
my
email
list:
a
request
for
information
from
my
community
about
their
thoughts
on
this,
because
I
really
didn't
know-
and
we
have
not
consulted
on
this.
So
I
can
tell
you,
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
it.
I've
got
a
lot
of
replies
and
I.
E
A
A
I
A
A
E
E
F
You
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
I
know.
My
motion
is
on
the
screen
shortly
momentarily
I.
Hope
in
discussion
with
my
colleague
mr.
mayor
I,
believe,
there's
a
great
support
for
this
motion
to
move
forward,
but
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
you
thanks
my
colleague
surgeries
for
a
second
in
this
motion
and
the
chair
of
CPC
committee.
If
you
guys
can
hear
us
there
just
arrived.
F
F
City
Council
to
a
the
addition
of
12
paramedic
in
2016
with
the
part,
were
parked
here,
budget
requirement
of
seven
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
to
be
funded
from
the
city's
provision
for
one-time
and
unforeseen
and
be
the
purchase
of
for
emergency
response
vehicle
at
the
estimated
cost
of
two
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
with
the
growth
portion
of
220
thousand
to
be
funded
from
the
development
charge.
Primary
paramedic
services
account
as
identifying
a
development
child
background
study
and.
F
So,
mr.
mayor,
and
that
we
need
we
need
the
help
right
now.
We
need
to
move
forward
quicker
and
I'm.
Looking
for
the
full
review
that
should
have
requested
from
our
staff
and
I
want
to
thank
programmatic
staff
and
then
general
manager
for
helping
us
with
this
with
this
motion,
and
they
are
in
support
of
that
Thank
You
Samantha,
but
I,
don't
know
that
they
know
it's
ourselves
all
about
that.
B
L
E
L
A
M
F
You
mr.
mayor
and
I
just
want
to
take
this
moment
to
thank
you
and
consolation
theory
and
councillor
Dean's
and
city
staff
and
of
course,
the
gentleman
mr.
antietam
Anthony
de
Monte
for
working
with
us,
and
this.
This
is
a
very
important
issue
across
the
city,
and
this
is
a
core
service
needs
to
be
equivalent
cross.
All
words
in
the
city
and
this
motion
will
help
this
balance
out.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
working
together
on
helping
us
with
this
motion
and
improving
our
paramedic
service
for
the
city
of
our
oh.
A
Like
to
underline
the
effort
of
my
colleagues,
we
often
say
that
we
are
a
big
city,
and
this
is
an
issue
that
really
affects
me,
because
anyone
in
the
room
living
in
a
rural
area
must
have
the
same
service
as
if
you
are
downtown.
I
have
a
question
for
mr.
de
Monte.
It
has
to
do
with
the
amount
of
money
I
see
it
here.
I
understand
that,
but
I'm
curious
for
the
subsequent
years.
What
will
we
do
to
cover
the
needs?
A
A
If
there's
an
increase
in
the
been
so
it
has
been
taken
into
account
this
year
we
cross
the
line
that
where
the
the
man
was
exceeded,
our
capacity.
So
if
this
motion
is
carried,
the
problem
will
be
settled
and
for
the
coming
years
we
have
forecasted
the
needs.
Thank
you
and
I'd
like
to
emphasize
once
again
the
efforts
made
by
my
colleagues.
It's
a
very,
very
relevant
issue
and
it's
a
basic
service
for
all
residents
in
the
city.
I
want.
E
To
thank
means
the
chair
of
the
committee
councillor
L
santeri
and
councillor
de
Roos,
who
worked
to
find
a
very
admirable
solution
and
to
mr.
de
Monte
and
his
staff.
We
very
much
appreciate
it
and
look
forward
to
the
review
on
the
motion
is
presented,
carried,
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure.
We
have
a
number
first
one
is
councillor
Chernus
Janko
seconded
by
myself,
with
respect
to
the
combined
sewage
storage
tunnel,
federal
provincial
funding
agreements
and,
as
you
know,
the
budget
included
our
federal
funding
in
the
budget.
E
L
Thank
you
very
much
for
mr.
mayor.
My
vow,
it's
two
pages
long,
quite
simply,
it
is
granting
the
delegated
authority
to
double-check
that
to
our
I
know
it's
to
our
clerk's
office,
deputy
city
clerk
and
the
mayor
to
execute
the
agreements
in
partnership
with
the
governments
of
Ontario
and
the
federal
government,
for
the
obvious
reasons
already
stated
that
we
will
not
have
the
opportunity
to
come
back
to
Council
to
committee
and
council
in
order
to
do
that,
and
time
is
very
much
of
the
essence
in
this
case.
Thank
you
great.
So.
E
On
the
rules
of
suspension
carried
on
the
motion
is
presented
by
councillor
Tishchenko
Kerry.
Thank
you
very
much.
The
next
item,
where
we
are
going
to
have
to
suspend
the
rules
of
procedure
be
waived,
is
moved
by
Councillor
egg
lie
second
by
councillor
McKenney.
This
was
a
technical
error
that
was
in
the
budget
document,
so
on
the
rules
of
procedure
being
waived,
Kerry
councillor
egg,
why
please
I
think.
M
Mr.
mayor
quite
correct
this,
this
was
an
error
made.
We
had
made
some
changes
to
the
fees
for
parking
and,
as
a
result
of
that,
there
was
an
error
made
in
terms
of
we're
now
moving
to
a
spring/summer
approach
and
and
reducing
the
the
the
parking
fees
that
there
is
an
issue
around
timing
on
that,
because
the
desired
implementation
date
for
the
new
system
is
April,
the
1st
2016.
M
M
The
year
is
counselor
Dean's.
If
you
look
at
the
second,
whereas
the
specific
fees
relating
to
residential
visitor
parking
permits,
one
request
residential.
This
report
confirms
two
weeks
in
temporary,
considered
Spartan
were
incorrectly
presented
and
approved
in
2016
budget
document
due
to
clerical
error
and
oversight.
If
I
was
welcome,
corrected,
certain
permit
holders
would
be
overpaying
department
fees
during
the
summer
months
at
under
pain
during
the
detriments,
and
therefore
it's
just
an
attempt
to
bring
it
all
in
line.
M
N
A
E
J
J
Therefore,
bit
resolved
at
City,
Council
1
a
directs
direct
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
to
bring
a
report
to
community
Protective.
Service
committee
and
council
recommending
an
amendment
to
the
licensing
Baur
to
require
the
payday
loan
establishment
to
to
be
subject
to
licensing
by
the
end
of
the
first
quarter
of
2017
and
be
direct
staff
to
consult
with
all
stakeholders
prior
to
the
submission
of
such
report
and
reflect
the
result
of
these
consultation
in
the
report
and
to
request
that
the
provincial
government
bring
forward
an
amendment
to
the
miss
back
to
2001.
E
F
F
What
this
is
community,
that's
being
developed
in
the
area
that
has
postal
codes
from
another
area
rather
than
the
Statesville
Ward
area,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
be
the
first
be
resolved
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
request,
Canada
Post
Corporation
recognize
the
properties
located
within
the
area
identified
on
the
attached
map
as
being
part
of
Statesville
and
arise.
The
mailing
addresses
for
these
properties
to
reflect
the
same
in
addition
to
being
located
in
Ottawa.
So
that's
the
motion
that
we'll
be
dealing
with
on
the
next
council
meeting
and
that's
what
I'm
putting
forward
6:20.
It's.
E
E
E
L
E
Thank
you,
I'd
remind
members
of
council
in
public
and
the
media
that
the
ottawa
67's
have
made
it
into
the
OHL
playoffs
and
they'll
be
coming
with
their
boss
and
the
whole
team
at
approximately
twelve
forty
and
trance,
where
we're
gonna
raise
the
67
flag
and
wish
the
team
the
very
best
in
the
OHL
playoffs.
So
if
you
can
come
to
that,
I
get
there
between
12:30
and
1214
we'll
be
there
we'll
raise
the
flag,
wish
them
well
and
they'll
be
on
their
way
to
their
first
playoff
game
on
the
elegant
Street
entrance.