►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – March 10, 2021
Description
Ottawa City Council– March 10, 2021 – video stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
members
of
council
and
staff
are,
please
ask
to
stay
on
mute
unless
called
upon
to
speak
phone
and
participants
may
use
star
6
to
mute
and
unmute
members
of
council
that
wish
to
speak
to
an
item.
Please
use
the
raise
hand
feature
located
at
the
bottom
of
participants
list
and
zoom
star
9
for
members
on
the
phone
and
the
meeting
will
be
broadcast
on
rogers
tv
and
ottawa
city
council,
youtube,
channel
participants
and
their
cameras.
C
D
E
F
A
H
Thank
you
that
agriculture,
I'm
rural
affairs
committee
report,
20
finance
and
economic
development
committee
and
community
and
protective
services
committee
joint
report,
1
finance
and
economic
development
committee
report,
21
planning
committee
report,
38
item
7
of
planning
committee
report,
37
transportation
committee
report
16,
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
february
24
2021,
be
received
and
considered.
A
I
Thank
you
mayor,
so
this
amends
the
zoning
schedule
just
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
precise
versus
what
was
originally
presented
to
planning
committee
moved,
whereas
on
february,
11th
planning
committee
recommended
the
approval
of
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
the
property
known
municipally,
as
1705
carling
avenue
and
whereas
subsequent
to
planning
committee,
the
applicant
requested
minor
changes
to
the
schedule
which
sets
out
the
permitted
heights,
setbacks
and
step
backs
were
required
to
be
consistent
with
the
intended
design,
which
are
supported
by
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
department.
Therefore
be
it
resolved.
I
The
council
approved
the
document
eight
of
the
said
report,
as
amended
by
motion,
be
replaced
by
the
schedule
shown
in
attachment
one
and
be
further
resolved
that
no
further
notice
be
given
pursuant
to
subsection
3417
of
the
act.
So
these
are
relatively
minor,
relatively
minor
clarifications
on
the
zoning
schedule.
J
A
B
K
L
C
I
C
M
N
A
A
I
A
D
I
can
just
read
it:
it's
one
sentence:
it's
that
staff
develop
and
distribute
to
council
by
may
of
2021
a
comparison
of
the
of
the
capital
funding
per
capita
for
new,
affordable
housing
between
the
city
of
ottawa
and
the
city
of
toronto,
as
well
as
gta
municipalities
over
the
next
eight
to
ten
years.
It's
just
a
comparison
document
per
capita
for
for
what
people
are
spending.
B
Mr
mayor,
it's
wendy
stephenson
speaking,
I
can
start
and
miss
gray
might
want
to
add
on
to
this
as
well.
No,
not
aware
of
the
direction
we
haven't
done
this
work,
so
it
would
take
a
little
bit
of
time
to
do
it.
It's
hard
to
estimate
whether
we
can
meet
the
counselor's
deadline
on
this
or
not
having
not
reviewed
it.
As
of
yet.
D
A
A
A
I
B
Counselor.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
We
have
a
number
of
deliverables
over
the
next
three
months.
We
have
some
major
reports
coming
forward
in
terms
of
our
tax
policy,
the
bia
budget
reports
and
things
like
that,
things
that
are
very
legislative
in
nature
and
they
can't
be
removed.
So
there's
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
flexibility
here
to
move
the
work
that
we
do,
because
it's
so
legislatively
driven.
So
this
would
be
an
add-on
to
to
what
we're
doing
today.
D
A
P
D
The
the
direction
was
to
simply
get
a
comparison
in
ontario
of
what
per
capita
spend
is
on
affordable,
new,
affordable
housing,
and
so
what
the
idea
was
for
toronto
and
other
gta
municipalities.
Let's
look
at
it,
let's,
let's
see
where
we
stand
in
that
my
understanding
is
where
we
stand
in,
that
may
may
be
a
source
of
of
input
from
counselors
and
it's
important
information
that
we
have
we're
kind
of
doing
this
in
a
vacuum.
D
If
we
don't
have
that
information,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we
can
get
as
much
federal
and
provincial
funding
for
this
priority
over
the
next
eight
to
ten
years,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
sometimes
you
need
your
one-third,
as
the
report
says.
So
we
don't
want
to
leave
money
on
the
table
and
that's
why
this
this
would
come
back
to
us
and
give
us
that
information.
That's
what
the
request
is
is
for
gta
municipalities,
including
the
city
of
toronto.
I
think
it's.
A
D
Q
Q
D
I
B
A
A
F
C
A
B
C
K
A
A
C
Yes,
if
it
could
be
put
on
the
screen,
mr
mayor
yeah,
so
it's
an
amendment
that
I'm
moving
seconded
by
a
councillor
mckenney.
It
resolved
that
committee
recommendation
to
be
removed
and
recommendation
one
be
amended
to
read
as
follows:
conduct
a
housing
blitz
with
the
community
partners
such
as
refugee
613
and
the
eastern
ontario
landlord
organization
to
identify
permanent
housing
that
is
affordable
and
available
for
the
homeless
families,
including
currently
in
the
shelter
system.
A
A
A
Item
10
official
plan,
amendment
corso
italia,
station
district,
secondary
plans,
zoning
bylaw
amendments,
minimum
parking
requirements
for
corso,
italia,
station
district
and
818
gladstone
avenue
for
station
district,
a
with
gladstone
a
nerf
duator
gladstone
councillor
leeper.
You
have
an
amendment
to
the
report
on
the
standard
bread
company
factory.
I
I
The
motion
is
as
follows:
whereas
the
report
recommends
the
approval
of
an
official
plan
amendment
to
establish
a
secondary
plan
and
zoning
amendments
to
implement
measures
for
achieving
public
realm
improvements
and
provision
of
the
area
as
a
major
meet
a
protected
major
transit
station
area
and
whereas,
during
the
february
25th
planning
committee,
meeting
staff
had
verbally
supported
a
request
by
the
ward
councillor
to
add
reference
to
the
existing
heritage.
Designation
of
the
standard
bread
company
factory
and
plant
bath
in
the
secondary
plan,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
I
The
council
approve
inserting
the
following
policies
to
document
three,
showing
the
modifications
in
red
and
re-numbering.
The
policies
that
follow
accordingly
4115
future
redevelopment
around
the
standard,
bread
company
factory
building
shall
incorporate
design
elements,
including,
but
not
limited,
to
building
setbacks.
Step
backs
massing
in
public
spaces
that
showcase
the
cultural
heritage
of
that
building
and
site
as
designated
under
part.
Four
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
and
four
one.
Four
two:
the
property
is
designated
under
part
four
of
the
ontario
heritage
act.
I
Any
redevelopment
of
this
site
shall
conserve
the
heritage,
value
and
attributes
of
the
designated
building
and
or
site.
I
would
just
remind
members
that
there
is
an
active
development
application
in
place
and
both
the
applicant
and
the
city
staff
have
been
excellent
about
ensuring
that
we
preserve
the
standard
bread
building
as
as
a
heritage,
building.
A
Thanks
and
and
just
as
your
point
you
pointed
out-
counselor,
the
property
is
designated
already.
So
thank
you
for
that.
So
on
the
amendment
by
councillor
leeper
and
kerry
harry
on
the
report
as
amended,
kerry,
okay
transportation
committee
report
number
16
rapunzel
is
the
committee
albion,
road
traffic
study
recommendations,
bank
street
to
leicester,
carried
carry
item,
12
blair,
road
transit,
priority
and
high
occupancy
vehicle
lanes
blair
station
to
innis
environmental
assessments,
study
recommendations.
G
A
A
H
C
Yeah,
so
there
are
two
components
of
the
motion:
one
it's
which
is
removing
one
of
the
recommendations
which
is
an
rfo
for
temporary
accommodations
and
then
the
second
one
and
and
what's
on
the
screen,
with
the
recommendation
of
of
donna
gray.
I'm
I'm
fine
with
with
amending
the
wording
to
reflect
what
donna
was
speaking,
but
I
think
it's
important.
Those
are
the
the
lessons
learned
that
we've
heard
from
our
first
housing
blitz
from
the
eastern
ontario
landlord
organization
and
the
alliance
down
homelessness.
H
We,
mr
mayor,
we
cannot
calculate
the
rent
supplement
at
the
average
market
rent
and
we
do
not
have
the
flexibility
in
the
current
funding
envelopes
to
fund
that
out
of
the
per
diem
cost.
So
we
do
not
have
the
legislative
authority
from
the
province
to
be
able
to
do
this.
We
would
have
to
seek
approval
for
them
to
make
these
changes.
C
C
Yeah,
okay,
donna.
I
just
have
a
follow-up
to
that
when,
when
we
heard
from
eastern
ontario
landlord
organization
and
the
alliance
and
homelessness
on
the
first
housing
blitz,
which
which
in
parts
was
successful
and
in
other
parts,
were
challenging,
we
heard
that
some
of
the
successes
was
at
wabino
and
and
that's
the
leverage,
the
elements
that
made
it
successful.
So
I'm
curious
if,
if
wabino
falls
under
a
different
authority
and
have
as
additional
flexibility
that
we
might
not
have
so,
is
it
possible
for
you
to
clarify
that.
E
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
so
wabano
receives
funding
under
an
indigenous
stream
of
the
home
for
good
program,
similar
to
like
similar
to
the
city
of
ottawa,
and,
if
you
might
remember,
we
used
the
home
for
good
funding
for
our
housing
first
program.
So
we
had
the
latitude
when
we
received
that
funding
to
set
our
housing
benefit
rate.
So
the
city
set
ours
at
600,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
what
wabano
set
theirs
at.
But
there
was
the
flexibility
at
the
time
that
we
received
that
funding
to
do
that.
As
you're.
C
B
A
I
I
H
So,
mr
mayor,
yes,
that
is
correct,
councillor
we're
unable
to
move
that
funding
envelope.
We
do
not
have
the
flexibility
to
move
that
funding
envelope
into
the
benefits.
So
to
do
this
motion
we
also
have
a
funding
gap.
Not
just
a
policy
gap
and
I'll
have
shelley
speak
to
the
specific
programs
that
that
fund
our
benefits.
E
Thank
you,
mr
maron
councillor
leeper,
so
the
funding
for
emergency
shelter
per
diems,
which
includes
hotel
costs,
comes
from
the
community
homelessness
prevention
initiative.
So
it's
it's
about
a
38
million
dollar
plot
of
provincial
funding,
so
the
so
the
funding
can
be
used
very
short
term
for
housing
subsidies,
not
rent
supplements,
but
for
housing
allowances.
You
need
permission
from
the
province
to
do
that.
E
The
issue
is
that
they
cannot
be
used
ongoing
to
convert
it
to
housing
subsidies
so,
for
instance,
if
our
per
diem
costs
were
to
increase
because
we
house
more
individuals,
we
can't
use
that
funding
long
term
for
housing
benefit,
and
you
know
our
experience
is
that
the
majority
of
our
families
require
that
funding.
You
know
long
term
to
be
able
to
support
housing
stability.
E
E
So
what
you
end
up
doing
is
you
end
up
taking
more
capital
funding
from
your
next
iteration
of
federal,
provincial
capital
funding,
called
the
ontario
priorities,
housing
initiative
to
support
that
family,
long
term
and
or
the
next
time
we
get
new
funding
under
the
canada
ontario
housing
benefit?
You
have
to
move
those
families
over,
so
you
can't
help
new
families.
So
it's
really
very
restrictive.
The
funding
that
you
get
from
the
province.
I
A
Okay,
so
we
now
have
it
on
screen.
So
this
is
the
challenge
with
last
minute
motions
which
haven't
been
run
by
staff.
We're
we
find
ourselves
in
a
little
bit
of
confusion,
so
the
recommendations
that
staff
are
comfortable
with
and
miss
great
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
the
underlying
section.
The
conducting
the
housing
blitz
is
fine.
A
A
I
would
argue
that
we
should
vote
against
that.
I
support
the
dudas
motion,
which
includes
recommendation
too,
and
then
we
have
a
separate
vote
on
item
one
which
has
now
been
amended,
we'll
call
it
a
friendly
amendment.
Counselor
fleet,
I
think
is,
is
agreeable
to
the
underlying
section.
Is
that
correct,
councilor
fleury.
C
M
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
yeah.
We
1850
is
the
average
market
rent
for
a
three-bedroom,
and
there
are
you
know
we
we
find
that
there
are
other
options
in
the
city
that
are
comparable.
You
know
that
that
can
be
afforded
at
this
rent
and
and
would
provide
a
good.
You
know
a
nice
and
modest
housing
option
for
these
families
at
this
particular
rent,
where
they
wouldn't
have
to
dig
into
other
benefits
that
they're
receiving
so
this
this
would.
F
F
F
F
So
this
request
for
offers,
in
my
mind,
allows
us
to
get
to
a
spot
where
maybe
we're
offering
more
in
these
emergency
shelter
situations
than
just
a
motel,
and
now
we
want
to
remove
that
request
for
offers.
I
don't
what's
what's
the
what's
the
rationale
behind
that
I
mean
that's.
That's
a
question
of
the
mover.
A
C
Absolutely
thank
you,
scott
for,
for
that
appreciate
the
opportunity.
So
for
me,
every
time
we
spend
a
dollar,
we
need
to
spend
it
with
a
key
to
a
lease.
So
the
idea
that
we
need
transition
for
families.
I
fundamentally
disagree
with
that.
So
when
there's
a
unit
available,
it
should
be
a
key
to
a
unit
which
you're
right,
the
the
families
that
paper
are
saying:
yeah,
we'd
rather
tabor
than
the
hotel,
but
we'd
also
be
in
in
favor
of
of
having
rights
here.
C
F
F
P
P
So
this
says
you
know
what?
Let's,
let's
not
go
out
and
look
for
do
an
rfo
and
you
know,
have
taber,
come
back
and
be
the
best
option
or
somebody
similar
and
be
the
best
option
and
we're
just
right
back
where
we,
where
we
are
spending
a
lot
of
money
on
on
shelter
and
not
not
on
housing,
and
this
gives
us
the
option
to
say:
okay,
you
know
we
we've
already
done
a
housing
blitz,
it
wasn't
successful
and
it
wasn't
successful
because
you
know
we
couldn't
get.
P
We
couldn't
get
that
the
deep
affordability
that
we
needed
for
families
to
move
out
of
of
shelters
today
or
individuals
to
move
out
of
shelter
today,
so
we
need
to
go
to
the
province.
We
need
to
ask
for
that
flexibility.
We
need
to
start
doing
something
different.
I
think
that
you
know
the
my
complete
frustration
with
all
of
this
is
that
we
continue
to
do
the
same
thing
over
and
over,
and
we
expect
different
results
and
it's
not
going
to
happen.
P
It's
not
going
to
happen
over
the
next
10
years
and
it's
not
going
to
happen
over
the
next
short
term
with
you
know,
if
we
just
go
out
with
an
rfo
looking
for
a
similar
solution
that
we
have
with
with
tabor,
and
then
staff
are
just
continually
trying
to
to
play
catch-up.
So
I
support
the
the
amendment
to
to
the
motion
by
staff
to
go
out.
Ask
for
us
the
province
for
that
flexibility,
to
be
able
to
shift
some
of
that
funding
and
and
get
people
housed.
P
E
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
I
believe
we
we've
acquired
with
the
province
recently
and
believe,
there's
somewhere
in
between
maybe
12
to
14
service
managers
that
are
using
chippy
funding.
So
the
the
you
know
whether
it's
their
emergency
shelter
per
diem.
You
can
use
chippy
for
a
variety
of
different
purposes
for
housing,
allowances
or
subsidies
again
very,
very
short
term,
and
they
have
to
transition
them
to
a
longer
term
program.
E
What
I
can
also
add
to
the
conversation
is
that
the
province
did
a
consultation
on
both
the
home
for
good
provincial
funding
stream
and
the
chippy
funding
stream.
My
gosh,
probably
late,
fall
or
earlier
this
year,
time's
moving
so
quickly
and
to
really,
I
think
they
may
be
thinking
of
merging
those
two
programs.
But
really
you
know
the
feedback
they're
getting
from
service
managers
is
that
we
do
need
more
flexibility.
E
In
the
program
I
mean
it
was
combined
and
and
given
to
us
to
promote
local
flexibility,
but
the
fact
that
it
is
so
restrictive
around
the
repurposing
of
the
that
funding
on
a
more
permanent
basis
to
be
invested
into
housing
allowances.
I
think
came
out
loud
and
clear
in
the
in
the
session
that
I
was,
I
participated
in.
E
E
You
know
we
also
had
some
landlords
come
in
with
you
know,
more
unsuitable
arrangements,
for
instance,
and
certainly
you
know,
I
think
there
was
there's
a
lapse
between
a
landlord
being
interested
in
the
program
and
then
matching
a
person
to
that
unit
right
so
so
landlords
are
only
waiting
in
what
was
you
know,
a
very
competitive
rental
market.
Only
you
know
interested
in
rating
for
a
very
short
period
of
time.
E
P
E
Oh
definitely,
I
think
any
you
know
increase
in
in
housing.
Subsidy
obviously
creates
you
know
that
deeper
affordability
for
households
where
they
don't
need
to
you
know
to
use
their
child
tax
benefit
or
any
other
kind
of
sources
of
family
income.
It
does
provide
more
security
of
tenancy.
You
know
moving
forward
if
we
were
able
to
provide
a
deeper
subsidy.
K
K
E
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
you
know.
Certainly
you
have
to
prepare
a
business
case
for
the
province.
They
need
time
to
review
it.
You
know
I'm
thinking
that
would
take
potentially
two
to
three
months,
but
I
think
it
involves
a
further
analysis.
If
you're
going
to
use
this
particular
pot
of
funding
for
that
purpose,
you
really
have
to
because
right
now
the
city
is
subsidizing.
That
pot
we're
not
really
spending
real
provincial
money,
we're
spending
city
money
with
whatever
we're
going
to
do
so.
E
I
think
we
need
to
do
an
analysis
about
you
know.
What
does
it
look
like
to
to
use
any
of
that
money
for
that
purpose?
How
does
it
reduce
the
costs
over
here,
and
we
also
have
to
examine
what?
What
what
does
that
look
like
if
we
were
then
to
change
our
family
capacity,
because
by
removing
funding,
you
can't
just
continue
to
offer
the
same
level
of
capacity
because
your
costs
will
increase
actually,
so
there
would
definitely
be
some
analysis,
that's
required,
so
I
would
think
that
would
take.
E
Q
My
question
is
for
either
ms
gray
or
ms
van
buskirk
or
mr
syed
we've
been
working
hard
for
an
upcoming
application
by
hazelview
in
inherent
gate,
and
it
will
be
at
planning
in
the
second
quarter
and
as
part
of
a
social
contract.
We've
been
discussing
as
you,
the
three
of
you
know:
housing
security
for
existing
tenants,
housing,
diversity
that
needs
to
be
included
in
the
application
and,
of
course,
a
major
component
is
housing,
affordability
and
our
goal.
Q
You
you
said
earlier
that
it
was
currently
not
permitted
by
the
province
to
use
average
market
rent.
You
would
have
to
get
a
change
in
the
rules
at
the
province.
So
I'd
like
clarification
on
that.
If
that
is
pertains
only
to
emergency
housing
that
we
are
discussing
here
or
if
that
includes
permanent
housing
that
we
would
be
looking
at
in
as
part
of
this
application.
M
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
councillor,
clothi
what
we
were
looking
at
before
with
hazelden.
Yes,
we
were,
we
were
using
the
average
market
rent
as
a
starting
point
in
negotiations
to
to
find
affordable
and
deeply
affordable
units
with
that
housing
provider.
I
think
what
gets
complicated
here
is
that
we
have
many
different
housing
allowance
and
run
supplement
programs
that
that
have
different
criteria
that
we
we
measure
against.
M
So
we're
talking
about
the
the
canada
ontario
housing
benefit
today
that
has
a
different
rent
structure
than
some
other
rent
supplement
programs
that
we
administer
as
well.
So
it's
difficult
for
us
to
always
compare
programs
as
apples
to
apples
and
then
there's
ways
that
we
could
package
other
capital
investments
or
incentives
with
private
developers
to
get
the
rent
from
average
market
rent
even
lower,
but
our,
but
the
average
market
rent
is
usually
our
starting
point
with
those
affordable
housing
discussions.
Q
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
might
understand
that
in
perhaps
the
final
documents
that
will
accompany
the
application
as
part
of
the
social
contract,
whether
it
be
a
a
separate
agreement
or
as
part
of
the
site,
specific
policies
that
we'll
find
as
part
of
that
application,
while
it
will
tar
it
will
aim
to
as
an
amount
the
average
market
rent
as
as
some
sort
of
benchmark.
Q
M
Q
You
you're
welcome
okay,
okay,
thank
you,
and
can
you
just
clarify
in
councillor
flurries
motion
and
I'm
not
sure
where,
where
it
is
now,
procedurally
and
and
I
it
refers
to
using
it-
had
two
thousand
dollars
which
is
now
1850
as
the
average
market
rent
for
three
bedroom
and
80
percent,
using
rent
supplements
to
attain
an
80
percent?
Can
you
can
you
explain
that
to
me
either
councilor,
fleury
or
or
a
member
of
the
housing
staff?
How.
M
Okay,
thank
you
yep,
mr
mayor.
I
could
explain
it
and
shelly
could
correct
me
if
I
get
anything
wrong
with
this,
but
under
the
canada,
terry
housing
benefit,
the
the
province
gives
us
their
metrics
to
use,
and
in
their
case
they
give
us
a
rent,
a
maximum
rent
of
which
we
could
base
the
benefit
on
at
1
559
for
a
three
bedroom
unit.
This
is
actually
less
than
the
cmhc
average
market
rent.
M
So
what
it
means
is
the
households
are
getting
a
little
bit
less
than
than
they
would
be
if
we
use
that
higher
rent
in
order
to
calculate
that.
So
so
you
know,
maybe
a
typical
household
under
that
that
particular
provincial
federal
benefit
might
get
860
dollars.
But
if
we
use
a
different
measure,
they
make
it
another
300
above
that
which
might
make
the
affordability
more
appealing
to
them
for
them
to
move
into
a
market
a
private
market
rent
unit
with
that
benefit.
M
A
H
A
Okay,
all
right
so
we'll
have
two
votes.
One
is
the
the
item
basically
number
one
we'll
call
it
and
I'll
just
read
it
out,
so
everyone's
clear.
What
we're
going
on
recommendation,
one
be
amended
to
read
as
follows,
and
as
a
result
of
the
staff
intervention,
they
are
now
comfortable
with
this
conduct,
a
housing
blitz
with
community
partners
such
as
refugees,
613
and
the
eastern
ontario
landlords
organization
to
identify
permanent
housing
that
is
affordable
and
available.
A
The
homeless
families
are
currently
in
the
shelter
system,
and
this
is
the
change
that
staff
have
recommended
and
request
the
province
changed.
The
guidelines
of
the
canada
housing
benefit
to
use
the
average
marketing
market
brand
amr
of
1850
as
the
amr
of
a
three-bedroom
to
increase
housing,
blitz
success
and
securing
affordable
units
with
private
sector
landlords.
So
on
that
carried
at
update,
okay,
all
right
now,
the
next
one
I'm
going
to
call
yeas
and
nays.
This
is
the
first
sentence,
be
it
resolve
that
the
committee
recommend
recommendation
to
be
removed.
A
A
A
D
F
Q
F
C
B
I
O
C
A
J
J
Thank
you.
So
this
item
basically
relates
to
legal
costs
between
snc
level
and
the
city
of
ottawa
as
a
result
of
delays,
and
last
week
when
fedco
met,
we
heard
we
had
a
report
on
on
stage
two
with
snc
level
on
on
the
trillium
line,
and
we
heard,
although
there
were
pressures,
we
did
not
hear
that
there
were
any
delays.
Two
days
later,
joanne
canelo
over
at
cbc
reported
that
back
in
january,
the
city
received
a
500
plus
page
schedule,
update
that
indicated,
snc
lavalounge
january
15th.
A
A
J
A
Okay,
so,
as
mentioned,
the
item
has
to
be
before
us:
it's
not
before
us.
It
will
at
some
point
it
will
go
to
fedco.
We
have
the
item
before
us.
Now
is
the
contingency
funding
for
additional
legal
costs
so
on
this
item,
if
there's
any
questions
in
camera
on
this
item,
counselor
mckinney,
do
you
have
any
questions
on
what's
before
us.
P
Yes,
mr
mayor
and
similar
to
counselor
deans,
before
proving
this,
I
think
we
do
need
answers.
I
think
the
public
is
looking
for
answers.
We
were
told
that
that
it
was
a
slight
delay.
We've
since
learned
that,
in
fact,
what
we're
faced
with
is
probably
something
similar
to
to
what
happened
on
on
line
one,
and
I
think
it
needs
to
be
questioned
today
before
we
vote
on
this.
I'm
not
sure
why
we
would
not
want
to
have
that
our
questions
answered
in
a
public
forum.
F
D
Yeah
thanks
very
much
mayor.
It
was
revealed
previously
that
you
knew
about
a
lower
technical
score
for
lrt
and
didn't
reveal
that
to
city
council.
Nor
did
staff
reveal
that
to
city
council.
You
knew,
but
the
rest
of
council
did
not
know
was
my
understanding,
I'm
wondering
in
this
situation.
Did
you
also
know
that
the
recommendation
of
the
the
report
that
came
in
was
also
a
four-month
delay?
A
D
A
A
F
A
C
A
N
Just
on
procedure
merits,
in
absence
of
any
advance
notice
that
we're
coming
today
I
do
agree.
All
parties
should
be
prepared
to
have
this
conversation,
and
so
I
believe
that
there
is
insufficient
discussion
and
debate
about
lrt
in
general.
But
if
we're
going
to
go
down
this
path,
there
should
be
an
opportunity
for
everyone
to
be
prepared
so
I'd
rather,
we
park
the
request
from
councillor
menard
today,
but
get
a
commitment
that
in
the
not
too
distant
future.
We
have
this
further
discussion
and
debate.
N
N
A
H
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
If
I
understand
the
original
question,
we
don't
really
need
to
have
a
whole
fulsome
discussion,
but
there
are
directed
questions
that
have
to
do
with
when
the
when
city
management
knew
that
there
was
going
to
be
delay,
and
we
do
have
the
mayor
is
here.
Mr
manconi
is
here
our
senior
manager
is
here.
I
think
they
can
certainly
answer
questions
that
we
at
council
should
have
answers
for,
and
I
think
that
we
could
get
those
today.
H
H
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
want
to
a
point
of
clarification.
When
councillor
luloff
asked
a
question
he
asked.
If
we
delayed
this,
if
the
propos
he
suggested
that
one
of
the
reasons
to
delay
it
is
because
the
proponent
isn't
here
today,
so
am
I
given
to
understand
that
if
we
do
delay
this,
the
proponent
will
be
available
to
us.
C
M
J
Sure
counselor
lulov
suggested
that
we
didn't
have
the
people
in
the
room
today
for
this
discussion
I
mean,
I
think
the
question
I
want
to
ask
was
a
very
simple
one.
Why
weren't
we
given
the
information
in
a
timely
fashion
about
delay
on
phase
on
trillium
line
phase
two
that
was
provided
to
senior
staff
and
presumably
the
mayor
back
in
january,
but
councillor
luloff
suggested
that
we
didn't
have
the
proponent
we
needed
the
proponent.
So
I'm
just
asking
if
we
agree
to
a
delay,
will
the
proponent
be
available
to
counsel.
M
Yeah,
the
you
know
the
issue
whether
proponents
required
is,
you
know,
still
to
be
determined.
The
more
important
person
is
our
external
legal
counsel.
Sharon
vogel
is
important
because
this
issue
on
schedule
and
any
motivation
for
what
the
schedule
notifications
to
the
city
are,
which
are
an
ongoing
basis,
are
in
integral
in
integrated
with
the
legal
discussion.
M
So
you
can't
have
one
without
the
other,
so
ms
vogel
should
be
here
to
be
able
to
give
you
context
in
terms
of
the
schedule
and
why
the
the
information
that
staff
provided
you
on
the
briefing
last
time
is
the
best
information
we
have.
We
talked
about
the
the
delay
that
we
told
you
would
be
outstanding,
so
we
don't
have
everybody
here
that
we
need
right
now,
because
the
agenda
item
is
not
on
on
the
agenda
point
of
personal.
M
M
I
can't
commit
to
that
because
the
work
is
still
happening
with
our
scheduler
and
the
the
company
that
we
brought
in
that
we
told
you
about
and
last
time
we
thought
we
would
need
a
couple
months
for
that
to
happen.
The
next
medical
meeting,
I
believe,
is
early
april
and
we
were
looking
in
at
may
at
best
case
scenario,
for
us
to
be
able
to
bring
the
analysis.
M
K
Egglion.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
this
motion.
I
would
think
that
that
colleagues
who
are
in
favor
of
of
having
this
discussion
want
to
have
it
in
a
fulsome
and
substantive
way.
They
want
to
make
sure
that
the
people
who
can
answer
the
questions
are
here
that
they're
prepared
that
their
council
colleagues
also
have
noticed
that
this
discussion
is
coming
up
and
can
consult
their
constituents
prepare
questions
as
they
see
fit.
K
You
know
it
makes
no
sense
to
me
to
throw
an
item
of
this
importance
on
on
the
agenda
at
the
last
minute,
with
absolutely
no
notice
to
have
at
best
a
half-hearted
discussion
around
it,
because
we
don't
have
the
information
we
don't
have
input
from
the
public.
We
don't
have
the
people
ready
and
available
to
answer
the
questions.
K
It
simply
makes
no
sense
to
me
to
do
this
unless
some
people
don't
want
to
get
full
answers
and
and
don't
want
to
give
staff
an
opportunity
to
properly
answer
the
questions
to
me,
which
is
just
counterproductive.
So
so
I
I
will
not
be
supporting
this
we're
going
to
do
this.
Let's
do
it
properly.
We
have
a
processes,
counselor
moffat
set
out.
Let's
do
it
properly.
K
Let's
have
all
the
right
people
all
the
right
information
appropriate
time
to
prepare
for
all
council
colleagues,
to
be
aware
that
this
is
upcoming
and
on
the
agenda,
and
you
know
so
again,
I
think
counselor
moffat
got
it
spot
on.
We
have
a
process.
Council
brockington
spoke
to
that
as
well
and
and
I'll
be
joining
them
in.
In
voting
no
to
this
the
motion
again,
if
we're
going
to
do
it,
let's
do
it
properly.
P
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion.
People
do
want
answers.
We
got
conflicting
information.
We
were
told
one
thing
and
found
out
the
next
day
that
in
fact,
there
is
documented
evidence
that
what
we
were
told
wasn't
wasn't
necessarily
the
case.
So
I
think
that
I
can't
imagine
that
people
staff
proponent
anyone
has
been
sitting
around
not
expecting
these
questions
to
be
raised.
P
We're
hearing
from
members
of
the
public
who
paid
for
the
system
we
are
hearing
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
counting
on
this
system
and
they
want
to
know.
Is
it
the
wait?
Is
it
delayed
by
four
days
40
days,
four
months,
12
months?
So
I
think
that
that
we
can
have
this
discussion
today.
I
think
we
can
ask
questions
today.
P
That
certainly
doesn't
stop
us
from
having
a
more
fulsome
discussion
as
we
move
forward.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
agree.
We
do
have
to
have
a
much
more
fulsome
discussion
and
we
have
to
have
it
often
or
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
in
the
same
situation
that
we
were
in
with
phase
one
and
after
phase
one
opened
and
all
of
the
issues
around
phase
one,
and
we
know
what
happened
with
phase
two.
P
Today
we
have
in
front
of
us
being
asked
15
million
dollars
of
taxpayer
dollars,
because
we
have
to
continue
to
pay
legal
fees
to
the
same
proponent,
to
the
same
snc
level
under
a
different
name,
rtm
versus
because
of
the
the
issues
around
around
phase
one.
So
there
are
numerous
questions
to
be
asked.
They
need
to
be
asked
in
a
public
forum,
people
who
count
on
transit
who
are
waiting
for
it
who
have
paid
for
it.
P
That's
not
us
unless
taxpayers
in
the
city
of
ottawa
deserve
answers
and
they
deserve
to
know
whether
this
system
is
is
on
time,
and
I
can
tell
you
looking
at
the
trillium
line.
The
most
certainly
is
not
on
time.
Anybody
with
you
know
any
view
of
of
what's
happening
out.
There
would
know
that
we
are
not
on
time
and
we
deserve
to
know
why
that
is
and
what
the
consequences
of
that
are
going
to
be.
Thank
you.
A
D
Then
there
there
then
I
have
a
question.
I
I
I
suppose
motion.
I
have
a
question,
I'm
still
on
the
speaker's
list,
so
so
the
the
question,
the
question
that
I
I'm
wanting
to
pose
is
I'm
hearing
counselors
say
that
they
are
concerned
about
timing
because
they
want
to
get
a
lot
of
questions
asked
they
have
they
want
to
get
delegations
here.
They
want
to
make
sure
all
the
proponents
are
here.
They
want
to
have.
All
of
that.
D
D
Why
wasn't
council
informed
about
this,
and
why
was
the
and
was
the
mayor
informed
as
he
was
when
the
rest
of
council
was
kept
in
the
dark
when
snc
lavaland
was
discovered
to
not
have
met
the
technical
score
in
the
rfp?
We're
seeing
this
process
repeat,
and
so
the
question
is,
the
question
is:
if
it's
not
today,
for
that
very
simple
question,
that's
been
asked
that
staff
should
be
answering
today.
A
P
D
Q
Q
P
B
C
R
N
A
A
C
Oh,
I
believe,
that's
duplication,
mr
mayor,
so
that
that
one
can
be
removed.
Sorry
about
that,
whereas
the
right-of-way
heritage
and
urban
design
services
have
identified
ten
thousand
dollars
from
its
budget
to
provide
for
one-time
enforcement
resource
in
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
over
the
weekends.
C
For
the
duration
of
the
patio
season
may
to
august
primary
in
the
byron
market
and
throughout
the
downtown
core
as
necessary
and
whereas
in
context
in
order
to
extend
the
enforcement
coverage
to
all
right-of-way
patios
and
on
a
daily
basis
for
the
duration
of
the
patio
season,
three
additional
resources
are
necessary
and
an
additional
add.
An
additional
cost
of
thirty
thousand
total.
C
B
B
G
C
R
C
R
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
So
this
is
an
integrated
enforcement
approach.
There's
there
is
a
robust
enforcement
strategy.
That's
been
outlined
in
the
report.
We
feel
that
the
the
additional
resources
the
resource
that's
being
funded
through
pide,
will
help
supplement
the
enforcement
strategy
on
thursday,
friday
and
saturday
night
for
enforcement.
In
you
know,
bywood
market
in
other
areas,
as
as
it
becomes
necessary,
so
the
the
one
resource
will
be
monitoring
patio
activity.
Any
related
violations
proactively.
R
There
will
be
a
wrap
up
on
monday
morning
to
identify
where
those
complaints
are
coming
from
and
pidestop
will
follow
up
to
ensure
that
you
know
the
the
three
strikes
throughout
policy.
That's
been
that's
been
identified
in
the
report,
so
you
know
first
violation
they
they
get
a
written
warning
and
the
the
second
second
violation.
R
C
So,
mr
mayor,
I
guess
you
know
just
to
clarify
my.
The
intent
of
my
motion
is
for
us
to
not
follow
up
after
but
be
able
to
respond
to
complaints
as
they
come
in
we're
extending
to
2am.
That
raises
major
livability
concerns
and
it's
not
simply
on
weekends.
So
that's
the
purpose
of
the
motion.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
R
Mr
mayor,
thank
you.
We
don't
have
the
budget
to
to
fund
in
the
additional
any
additional
positions
or
or
resources.
At
this
point,
we
do
feel
that,
similarly
to
what
we,
the
approach
that
we
took
last
summer,
the
proactive
enforcement
that
that
was
done
last
summer
was
focused
on
the
the
thursday
friday
and
saturday
nights,
primarily
in
the
bywood
market.
So
we
had
some
success
doing
that.
O
R
R
The
answer
to
that
question
is
that
it
would
require
four
summer
students
to
be
able
to
do
that.
What
we're
proposing
here
is,
and
again
it's
very
important
to
understand
that
the
the
comprehensive
enforcement
strategy
outlined
in
the
report.
We
feel
that
the
one
resource
will
supplement
that
enforcement
strategy
and
provide
some
proactive
monitoring
again
only
on
thursday,
friday
and
saturday
night,
but
we
feel
that
that
that
will
be
sufficient.
Similarly
to
what
we
did
last
summer,.
O
Thank
you
for
for
that,
mr
chapman.
Mr
mayor,
we
had
a
committee
meeting,
we
have
a
delegation,
we
had
business
community
for
or
against
this
proposal,
and
we
have
from
everyone
we
heard
from
our
staff.
Then
today
we
are
faced
with
the
motion
on
the
floor
and
and
using
the
term
our
staff,
how
draft
in
it
where
staff?
O
Just
because
they
have
drafts-
and
it
doesn't
mean
they
agree
with
it
and
and
we
have
enough
restriction,
which
is
we
never
had
before
tree
strike
you
you
know,
you're
licensed
and
and
our
business
is
in
the
community
just
to
put
it
in
a
contact
for
some
of
my
colleagues
who
we
have
64
100
small
businesses,
they
employed
over
35
000
people
and
these
businesses.
According
to
the
canadian
small
business
association,
40
percent
of
those
businesses,
either
they
will
shut
down
or
they
would
barely
make
it
on
a
loss
during
independently.
O
O
N
Thanks
mayor,
I
hope
we
have
a
problem
in
the
market
where
it's
overwhelmed
and
people
are
coming
to
our
restaurants
and
patios,
and
people
get
out
this
summer
and
spend
their
money
and
feel
safe
again
to
do
that
and
I'm
not
trying
to
undermine
counselor
fleury
or
the
genuine
issue
he's
brought
to
us
today.
But
I
would
love
to
see
our
city
return
to
pre-covered
levels,
knowing
that
there's
a
lot
to
balance
this
summer,
but
I
really
want
to
see
us
slowly
to
get
back
to
that
this
summer.
N
So
my
question
to
mr
chapman
is
this:
assuming
people
do
come
into
the
market?
I
was
very
popular.
We
had
great
weather
last
year.
Patios
were
open
well
past,
the
normal
point
for
the
season,
and
you
do
your
monday
briefings
and
you
realize
look
we're
getting
overwhelmed.
We
need
more
resources,
I'm
not
hearing
you
have
the
capacity
to
do
that,
but
will
the
onus
be
on
counselor
flurry
to
come
back
or
how
do
you
balance
high
demand
for
service
versus
your
capacity
to
provide
that.
R
L
Certainly,
you've
seen
that
for
the
first
time
that
we've
been
administering
the
program
in
the
last
five
years,
at
least
we
will
have
that
dedicated
officer
proactively
enforcing
this
year.
We
know
more
than
ever
that
we
need
to
balance
livability
concerns
with
the
ability
for
folks
to
to
recover
economically.
L
L
However,
I
want
to
use
this
opportunity
as
well
to
advise
council
that
compliance
is
very
high.
Historically,
with
our
right-of-way
patios
we've
we've
had
very
few
noise
bylaw
infractions
over
the
last
few
years.
We've
put
an
incredible
amount
of
focus
on
accessibility
and
our
partners
have
really
risen
to
the
occasion
and
we're
being
very
proactive
with
our
dialogue
already,
knowing
that
the
season
is
just
upon
us.
So
we
have
every
confidence
that
that
that
that
positive
compliance
will
continue.
N
I
did
not,
I
didn't
attend
the
committee
meeting,
so
I
apologize
for
asking
this
question,
but
are
you
planning
a
proactive
campaign
where
you
physically
go
and
visit
bar
restaurant
owners
in
advance
of
the
season
saying
here's
what
our
expectations
are?
Yes,
we
want
you
to
be
successful,
but
they're
also
residents
who
live
within
the
market
to
try
and
mitigate
some
of
that
from
starting
to
begin
with.
L
L
That's
you'll
see
those
those
those
recommendations
outlined
in
this
report.
Our
team,
mindful
of
the
very
good
weather
that
that
seems
to
be
upon
us,
as
of
today,
has
been
having
those
focused
conversations
with
our
our
partners.
Over
the
last
few
weeks,
we've
got
a
very
specific
strategy
put
in
place
for
st
patrick's
day.
We
know
is
traditionally
the
unofficial
start
to
the
patio
season,
so
working
with
ottawa,
public
health
and
bylaw.
Those
conversations
have
been
ongoing
over
the
last
few
days.
L
N
N
P
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I'm
not
sure
how
asking
for
additional
resources
for
enforcement
is
undermining
business.
It's
not.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
you
know
we
all
love
patios,
as
we
were
having
this
discussion.
I
actually
just
got
a
text
from
my
wife
saying
that
when
she
was
on
her
way
to
work,
she
saw
that
pub
wells
had
their
patio
open
and
wants
council
to
end
early
so
that
we
can
get
out
there
later
this
afternoon,
not
likely
to
be
there
at
2
a.m,
but
that's
more
about
my
age
than
anything
else.
P
O
P
You
know
not
breaking
bylaws
that
they're,
you
know
not
or
serving
that
they're,
not
breaking
noise
bylaws,
but
they're
able
to
to
continue
that
that
we
are
able
to
afford
them
some
some
extra
latitude,
especially
this
year
and
going
forward,
I'm
very
pro
patio
I
always
have
been,
but
we
also
have
people
who
live
downtown
and
we
have
to
consider
what
that
means
and
all
patios
are
not
made
equal.
Some
of
them
are
within
feet
of
residential
areas.
They're.
P
You
know
where
kids
sleep,
where
people
you
know
go
to
bed
in
the
evening
at
night
and
and
and
we
have
to-
we
have
to
have
the
enforcement
tools,
the
resources
to
be
able
to
ensure
that
we're
only
going
after
the
ones
that
are
not
complying
with
with
the
bylaws
and
that
are
not
being
good,
neighbors
and
they're.
They
sometimes
you
know
we
can.
We
we
get
on
a
trade
trajectory
with
our
calls
to
bylaw
by
law
services
in
this
city.
P
P
P
It's
just
that
we
have
the
resources
to
ensure
that
that
we
have
what
we
need,
that
residents
have
the
assurance
they
need
and
that
businesses
that
have
asked
for
this
also
know
that
we
have
the
resources
we
need
to
go
after
the
you
know,
the
the
the
the
establishments
that
are
not
following
the
rules
so
that
we
don't
turn
residents
against
patios,
because
that's
what's
happened
in
the
past,
it's
been
very
difficult
to
establish
patios
in
in
the
downtown.
So
again,
this
is
asking
for
additional
resources.
P
K
K
K
So
it's
it's
not
an
additional
expense
because
they're
there
they're
they're
they're
doing
their
patrols
in
the
in
the
market
and
is.
Is
there
not?
Is
there
not
a
way
to
engage
ops
in
in
assisting
and
again
in
these
these,
these
very
unusual
times
to
to
do
some
of
that
enforcement
to
visit
some
of
those
bars
and
restaurants
to
have
that
discussion
around?
K
What's
appropriate,
not
appropriate
behavior
going
forward
in,
in
light
of
the
change
and
to
me,
that's
a
that's
a
no-cost
solution:
they're
already
there
they're
being
paid
they're
peace
officers,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
who
can
answer
that
question.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
that
the
the
answer
it
may
well
be
in
front
of
us
and
at
a
no
cost
other
than
what
we're
already
paying
for
the
officers
to
be
on
patrol
in
those
areas.
L
Mr
mayor,
maybe
I
can
I
can
take
a
shot
at
the
support.
Answering
the
counselor
ottawa
police
do
participate
in
some
of
the
bylaw
enforcement
activities.
However,
bylaw
has
been
the
lead
and
has
been
taking
the
brunt
of
this.
This
work
on
they
generally
have
assisted
bylaw
when
that's
to
keep
the
peace,
because
there
perhaps
is
an
understanding
that
there
may
be
some
there
could
be
some
violence
in
certain
cases.
L
That's
been
the
role
that
said
many
counselors
have
come
up
to
me
and
I
will
be
continuing
to
have
other
discussions
with
with
ottawa
police.
I
think
the
councillor's
question
is
very
apropos
and
perhaps
they
could
be
more
supportive
in
some
of
these
roles,
albeit
it
is
generally
fundamentally
viewed
by
them
as
a
bylaw
first
role,
but
perhaps
this
can
be
part
of
the
solution.
I
I
I
will
be
supporting
councillor
flurry's
motion.
It
is
a
significant
distance
from
the
byward
market
where
we
enter,
are
anticipating
enforcement
and
and
prioritizing
enforcement
to.
You
know
churchill
and
churchill
and
richmond
road.
We
know
that
in
late
evenings
at
2
a.m,
if
that
passes-
and
I
believe
it
will-
that
the
hope
of
getting
enforcement
on
a
bad
actor
in
the
far
reaches
of
of
westboro
is
virtually
nil,
and
we
also
know
the
police,
you
know
simply
don't
respond
to
noise,
bylaw
complaints.
I
We
can
ask,
but
at
one
o'clock
in
the
morning
they
have
they
have
other
priorities.
The
enforcement
of
noise
at
1am
is
going
to
be
critical
for
the
peace
of
mind
of
residents
parking
lot.
Patios
right-of-way
patios
are
in
very
non-traditional
spots
that
are
often
in
very
close
proximity
to
residential.
I
They
are
adjoining
backyards
that
are
residential.
They
are
below
the
apartment
windows
of
of
residential
units
and
by
going
to
2
am
we
are
going
to
have
noise
problems
if
the
bars
and
restaurants
in
some
neighborhoods
choose
to
take
advantage
of
those
hours.
I
would
ask
that
we
make
sure
that
the
enforcement
resources
are
there
to
deal
with
it.
I
A
single
officer
focused
three
nights
a
week
in
the
byward
market,
is
simply
not
going
to
be
able
to
respond
to
noise
complaints
that
may
arise
in
wellington,
west
or
in
in
westborough
or
even
further
afield.
So
folks,
if
we,
if
we
want
to
go
to
2am,
let's
enable
that,
with
the
enforcement
that
we
need
in
order
to
ensure
that
everyone
is
successful
this
season.
Thank
you.
D
Sorry,
thanks
very
much
I'll,
just
speak
very
quickly
to
it.
I
support
you
know
the
moves
to
a
2a
opening
on
our
patios,
and
I
do
that
reservedly.
I
said
this
at
transportation
committee
as
well
and
I
think
councillor
alicia
ontario
also
raised
these
issues
at
transportation
committee
trying
to
find
some
middle
ground
to
say.
D
Let's
allow
this,
but
let's
also
have
some
of
that
discussion
for
families
and
how
we
can
make
sure
we're
mitigating
some
of
the
issues
that
that
may
arise,
and
I
think
that
was
that
was
a
wise
discussion.
I
supported
this
at
committee,
but
I
also
raised
those
issues,
and
so
I'm
just
hoping
that
you
know
this
is
a
simple
motion:
we're
not
talking
about
a
lot
of
extra
here.
D
It's
it's
it's
very
minor
and
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
put
the
motion
up
before
we
actually
vote
on
it,
so
that
we
can
get
that
little
extra
bit
of
of
of
enforcement.
I
don't
think
that
this
is
sometimes
framed
as
oh.
You
know
you're
anti-business,
because
you
want
to
have
some
enforcement
well
we're
already
having
some
enforcement.
The
staff
have
already
said
that,
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
I
was
able
to
to
support
the
2am
previously
this.
D
C
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
and
thank
you
members
of
council
for
for
engaging
one.
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
a
number
of
points.
I
believe
it
was
anthony
damonte
who
spoke
to
ottawa
police,
not
responding
to
noise.
We
do
have
formal
correspondence
from
ottawa
police
in
relation
to
noise
responses,
so
that
that
dates
back
now
tony.
How
many
years
did
bylaw
officially
formalize
that
mr.
L
Mayor,
I
don't
remember
off
offhand,
but
it's
been
for
some
time
that
bylaw
regulatory
services
have
had
the
the
responsibility
to
answer
noise
complaints
as
a
primary.
I
think
it
was
a
former
deputy
that
was
responsible
for
that
program.
That's
no
longer
with
us
actually,
so
it's
been
several
years.
C
C
Yes,
there
are,
the
majority
of
operators
are
good,
but
yes,
it's
also
important
to
have
the
right
enforcement
to
inform
and
to
enforce
those
who
aren't
following
the
rules.
That's
all
we're
saying
here
is
seven.
This
is
2
a.m.
Seven
days
a
week,
so
it's
important
for
us
to
be
able
to
enforce
this
seven
days
a
week
as
complaints
come
in
so
I'll
ask
members
for
for
their
support.
This
is
not
about
the
buyer
market.
This
is
about
the
program.
C
We
have
a
program
that
is
expanded
to
2am,
citywide
and
and
it's
expanded
for
seven
days,
and
we
just
it's
important
to
have
when,
when
your
constituency
calls,
because
there's
a
a
complaint
on
a
patio
that
the
city
is
able
to
respond
that
same
evening,
so
I
I
I
I
will
ask
for
your
support.
Thank
you,
mr
rain.
A
So
I'll
offer
a
couple
of
comments.
First,
it
is
about
the
bywood
market,
because
that's
what
the
motion
says
primarily
in
the
byward
market
before
committee,
the
counselor
went
to
staff
and
asked
for
more
proactive
enforcement
of
patio
staff
came
back
with
a
plan
under
the
leadership
of
counselor
tierney
at
the
transportation
committee
for
a
dedicated
summer
student
to
proactively,
monitor
and
enforce
when
patio
issues
actually
occur
from
thursday
to
saturday.
Let's
remember
this
is
in
addition
to
the
usual
by-law
officers,
already
patrolling
in
the
market
and
busy
commercial
areas
on
an
ongoing
basis.
A
A
The
three
strikes
you're
out
regime
were
putting
in
place
is
the
toughest
set
of
measures
we've
brought
before
brought
forward
to
encourage
good
behavior
from
restaurants
and
staff
believe
that
this
will
lead
to
a
high
level
of
compliance.
We
also
ask
where's
the
money
coming
from
and
our
treasurer
clearly
stated.
We
do
not
know
all
of
the
details
of
phase
three
state
safe,
restart
program,
so
I'd
encourage
you
vote
against
this,
and
I
heard
some
counselors
talk
about
how
they
support
the
patio.
A
So
I
hope
they
all
get
on
board
and
support
this
initiative
to
help
these
businesses,
who
have
been
some
of
the
hardest
hit
as
a
result
of
covid19,
in
compliance
of
course
with
ottawa,
public
health,
and
we
will
talk
with
continue
discussions
with
the
ottawa
police
to
see
that
they
step
up
their
role
as
well
as
by-law
officers.
So
I'd
encourage
members
of
committee
to
vote
against
the
motion
and
vote
for
the
report
so
yeas
and
nays
on
the
flurry
motion.
Please.
F
C
Q
R
F
N
I
B
R
A
C
H
I'm
here
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
report
20
finance
and
economic
development
committee
and
committee
and
protective
services
committee
joint
report,
one
finance
and
economic
development
committee
report,
21
planning
committee
report,
38
item
7
of
planning
committee
report,
37
transportation
committee
report
16
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
february
24
2021
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended.
G
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
mayor,
and
hopefully
we
can
put
this
up
on
the
screen
as
well
I'll
read
through
it,
since
we
didn't
last
time.
So,
whereas
section
223.3
of
the
municipal
act,
2001
authorizes
a
municipality
to
appoint
an
integrity
commissioner,
who
reports
to
council
and
is
responsible
for
performing
in
an
independent
manner.
G
City
council
one
thank
mr
marlow
for
the
valuable
service
that
he
has
undertaken
for
the
city
of
ottawa
over
his
tenure
as
integrity.
Commissioner,
two
direct
the
city
clerk
to
request
that
mr
marlow
participate
in
a
voluntary
accident
interview
with
the
city
clerk
city,
clerk's
design
to
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
process
set
out
in
the
statutory
officer,
recruitment,
appointment
and
contract
administration
procedures,
three
delegate
authority
to
the
city
clerk
to
undertake
a
recruitment
and
appointment
process
for
a
new
integrity.
Commissioner,
in
accordance
with
the
criteria,
principles
and
remuneration
schedules
set
out
in
attachment.
G
One
and
lastly,
number
four
direct
the
city
clerk
to
report
back
to
council
on
the
exercise
of
the
delegated
authority
immediately
following
contract
execution.
By
way
of
memorandum
set
out
setting
out
information
regarding
the
new
integrity,
commissioner
and
the
recruitment
and
appointment
process
that
was
used.
A
Great
well,
thank
you
very
much
councillor
suds
and
we'll
have
it
more
of
a
formal
opportunity
to
thank
mr
marlow,
for
I
think
his
nine
years
of
service
as
our
first
integrity,
commissioner.
So
this
starts
the
the
ball
rolling
to
get
going
with
our
next
hiring
of
our
integrity.
Commissioner,
any
questions
or
comments
so
on
the
the
motion
carried
adopted,
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure,
mostly
jean
response
regulator.
Councillor
moffat
requires
suspension
with
respect
to
comments
to
the
ministry
on
the
waste
production
plan.
A
F
Divert
over
692
tons
of
hazardous
materials
and
whereas
the
waste
diversion
act,
2002
designates
the
municipal,
hazardous
or
special
waste
material
and
requires
a
waste
diversion
program
be
established
and
invented
for
this
category
of
waste.
And
whereas
the
provincial
municipal
hazards,
hazardous
or
special
waste
program
is
currently
operated
by
stewardship
material,
product
care,
recycling
and
automotive
materials
stewardship.
F
1
2021,
as
per
the
resource
recovery
and
circuit
economy,
act
2016.
And
whereas,
after
extensive
constitutional
stakeholders,
the
ministry
issued
the
proposed
producer
responsibility,
regulation
for
hazardous
or
special
products.
On
february
11,
with
the
45
day
comment
period
ending
march
28,
2021
and
whereas
city
staff
are
reviewing
the
draft
regulations
and
preparing
briefings
with
members
of
council
over
the
coming
weeks,
including
anticipated
impacts
to
auto
residents
and
the
city's
operations.
F
And
what
is
known
and
unknown
at
this
point.
With
the
aim
of
answering
any
questions.
Council
may
have,
as
well
as
consolidating
a
list
of
comments
and
or
outstanding
questions
from
both
council
and
city
staff.
Subject
matter,
experts
and
whereas
the
time
between
the
release
of
the
draft
regulations
and
the
end
of
the
comment
period
will
not
allow
city
staff
to
adequate,
adequate
time
story
to
prepare
and
submit
draft
comments
for
committee
and
council.
Approval
before
submitting
to
the
province
by
the
deadline,
therefore
be
resolved.
F
A
council
delegate
authority,
the
general
manager
of
public
works
and
environmental
services
to
work
with
the
solid
waste
master
plan
council
sponsors
group
to
prepare
and
finalize
comments
on
the
draft
hazardous
and
special
products.
Regulations
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
ottawa
and
be
for
the
resolve
that
city
staff
be
directed
to
provide
council
with
a
copy
of
the
comments
submitted
to
the
province
and
provide
an
update
to
community
council
to
highlight
any
notable
changes
between
the
draft
regulations
and
final
regulations
once
they
are
registered
later
in
2021.
A
C
Mayor
this
is
a
typical
demo
permit
motion.
Do
you
want
me
to
just
be
read
the
therefore
be
it
resolved
sure,
therefore,
be
it
resolve
that
council
approved
demolition
control
for
the
existing
building
on
the
property
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
one
that
property
owner
pay
paid
3472,
including
legal
fees
nhst,
which
is
the
fee
associated
with
the
demo
control
application,
two
that,
until
the
time
of
the
construction
of
the
first
replacement
building
the
registered
owner
shall
landscape
the
property
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
manager
of
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development.
C
Oh,
I
always
forget
those
four.
The
owners
shall
pay
100
securities
for
the
city
for
the
value
of
the
landscaping,
the
property
with
the
securities
to
be
released
once
these
works
are
completed.
Five,
the
owner
agrees
that
the
discretion
of
the
general
manager,
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development
department,
a
replacement
building,
must
be
substantially
completed
within
five
years.
For
the
date
of
disapproval,
and
in
default,
their
ad,
the
city
clerk,
shall
enter
in
a
collector's
role.
The
sum
of
five
thousand
dollars
for
the
residential
dwelling
to
be
demolished.
C
Six,
the
registered
owner,
shall
enter
into
an
agreement
with
the
city
of
ottawa
to
include
the
foregoing
conditions
and
pay
all
costs
associated
with
the
registration
of
said
agreement
at
such
time
as
the
building
permit
is
issued
to
redevelop
the
site
and
the
replacement
buildings
in
its
place,
the
agreement
will
become
null
and
void
and
will
be
released
upon
request
of
the
owner.
The
owner
shall
pay
all
costs
associated
with
the
release
of
the
agreement
at
seven,
the
owner
agrees
that
the
demolition
permit
will
not
be
issued
and
building
cannot
be
demolished
until
such
time.
C
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I
see
no
hands
up
on
the
motion
carried
okay,
counselor
clutchier.
You
have
a
notice
of
motion
for
private
approaches.
Eastway
gardens!
Do
you
want
to
deal
with
that
now,
because
I
think
it's
the
same
as
councillor
brockington
and
egleye
and
others
have
brought
up
when
there's
road
reconstruction.
A
Q
It
is
scheduled
for
water
and
sewer
work
in
2021
and
in
2022,
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
driveways
with
our
are
not
in
complete
conformity
with
the
city's
front
yard,
parking
restrictions,
private
approach,
bylaw,
and
so
the
therefore
be
it
resolved
is
very
simple.
That
council
approved
that
in
respect
to
the
reconstructions
of
avenue,
n,
o
p
q,
r
s
t
and
u
private
approaches
be
reinstated,
as
they
were
immediately
prior
to
the
reconstruction
of
these
streets,
and
I
will
also
add
to
colleagues
on
council.
A
H
A
K
You
thank
you
very
much
and
and
colleagues
for
allowing
me
to
put
on
the
the
public
health
hat
today.
This
is
our
last
public
meeting
prior
to
st
patrick's
day,
which
is
we
all
know,
is,
is
a
significant
event
in
the
city
of
ottawa.
People
like
to
get
out
and
and
celebrate
everybody's
irish
on
st
patrick's
day
in
ottawa,
and
normally
that's
a
great
a
great
thing,
and
people
really
enjoy
the
opportunity.
K
We
would
certainly
ask
that
you
do
not
organize
any
kind
of
st
patrick's
day
party
in
in
your
home.
You
know
we
know
from
a
year
now
that
most
of
the
times
when
we
have
a
spike,
we
have
virus
spread.
It
comes
out
of
some
sort
of
a
social
event,
so
as
tempting
as
it
might
be
to
get
together
with
friends
and
family
to
to
celebrate
that
in
in
your
in
your
home.
Please
don't
do
that
this
year,
and
I
would
just
ask
my
my
colleagues
to
you
know,
share
the
message.
K
Public
health
will
be
providing
further
messaging
as
we
get
closer
to
st
patrick's
day,
but
I
would
I
would
ask
my
colleagues
just
to
please
share
that
message
amongst
their
their
constituents,
and
I
wish
everybody
a
happy
st
patrick's
day
and
certainly
hope
that
in
20
20
22
that
we
can
all
get
together
and
have
the
parade
and
and
and
celebrate
it.
You
know
close
to
one
another,
but
this
year
we
have
to
treat
it
differently
and-
and
I
appreciate
everybody's
cooperation
and
collaboration
in
doing
that.