►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – February 26, 2014
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – February 26, 2014
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
B
C
C
Good
morning,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
and
welcome
to
the
February
26
2014
meeting
of
Ottawa
City
Council
Bienvenue
annual
events,
this
very
timid,
kettles,
decor,
say
miss
ban
leveled
a
wall
for
those
who
are
able
to
could
they
please
stand
for
the
singing
of
our
national
anthem
and
remain
standing
as
we
first
give
you
the
prayer,
Almighty
God,
let
us
work
together
to
serve
all
our
people
judge
if
we
saw
a
de
nuit,
Ave
or
Samba
offended
beer.
Sylvia
knows
why
and
that's
not
similar
here.
That
was
well
the
course
I.
D
Now
I'm
pleased
to
introduce
councillor
blows,
who
will
introduce
the
singers
for
this
song?
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I'm,
pleased
to
introduce
you
to
the
choir
of
mr.
Bailey
and
Julia
Capelli
sebastian
wa
comida
y
victoria
captain
are
all
students
from
the
gatineau
secondary
school.
In
orleans
they
did
sing
singing
together
for
three
years.
Each
member
took
a
music
course
in
the
school
outside
of
their
rehearsals.
They
take
part
in
many
other
activities,
Sebastian
and
Julia.
The
goaltender
of
their
soccer
team
cami
takes
language
courses
and
Victoria
is
finishing.
Her
piano
studies.
C
Council
who
were
wearing
pink
this
is
where
pink
day
and
appreciate
the
work
that
councillor
hubely
has
done
on
the
anti-bullying
issues
in
our
community,
so
Thank
You,
councillor,
hubely
I'd,
now
ask
David
Vesey
to
join
us
at
the
front.
As
we
present
this
week's
mayor
city
builder,
award
and
David
has
some
family
and
friends
with
them
here
today
as
well.
David
welcome
come
on
over
here
and
we'll
ask
David's
councillor
Jan
harder
to
be
with
us
who
was
a
great
supporter.
C
C
D
C
Has
been
the
president
of
our
havens,
children's
softball
organization
and
under
his
leadership,
the
league
has
grown
to
the
largest
of
its
kind
in
all
of
Ontario,
which
is
very
impressive,
and
he
also
serves
as
the
children's
activity
coordinator
at
the
bar
Haven,
Canada,
Day
and
anyone
who's
been
to
bar
him
in
Canada.
Today
knows
what
a
great
event
the
thousands
of
people
that
come
and
that
the
kids
that
get
so
excited.
C
So
thank
you,
David
for
doing
that,
whatever
the
job,
whatever
job
is
needed
to
be
done,
David
always
longs
tears
to
do
it,
no
matter
how
big
or
small
he
spends
literally
hundreds
of
hours,
learning
about
and
implementing
new
ideas
for
practices
that
kids
are
both
encouraged
and
have
are
encouraged
and
having
fun,
also,
while
on
the
ice,
but
it's
his
enthusiasm
and
attitude
that
are
most
infectious,
not
for
the
kids,
but
for
the
parents
as
well.
In
fact,
when
one
of
my
employees
called
mr.
C
Vesely
to
tell
me
he
won
this
award,
it
was
the
day
the
canada,
latvia,
quarterfinal
game
was
taking
place.
It
was
one
one
after
two
periods,
mr.
Vesey
joked
that
it
was
a
tense
time
to
be
calling,
but
reassured
us
that
whatever
the
outcome
is
always
in
a
good
mood
because
he
works
with
200
Tim
bit
hockey
players
and
you
can
never
be
sad
after
seeing
all
these
kids
play.
It's
that
kind
of
attitude
that
has
made
mr.
C
Vesey
beloved
an
essential
part
of
Nepean
minor
hockey
that
he
is
and
I'm
very
thrilled
that
you
and
your
wife
and
kids
and
their
spouses
and
significant
others
and
friends
from
Barre
Haven
could
be
with
you
today.
We're
very,
very
proud
of
the
work
you
do.
I
know
that
you
do
this
not
for
the
awards,
but
for
the
love
of
the
kids
that
you
have
and
the
love
of
sport,
and
thank
you
for
the
great
work
you
do
and
congratulations.
C
E
First
of
all,
Thank
You,
Jan
and
and
mayor
Watson,
for
an
amazing
honor.
Anyone
who
knows
me
I'm
not
used
to
being
uncomfortable,
in
fact,
I'm
not
used
to
necessarily
needing
a
mic
because
I
just
retired
after
35
years
of
teaching
high
school-
and
it
was
really
nice.
You
had
high
school
kids
here
to
make
me
feel
more
comfortable.
E
I
was
thinking
about
because
I
know
I
only
have
about
a
minute
to
speak
to
Council
a
lot
of
the
charity
work
I've
done
over
the
last,
probably
forty
five
years
of
doing
charity
work
has
been
centered
on
sport
and
I.
Think
sometimes
we
hear
that
you
know
healthy
living
message
and
it's
true.
But
sports
way
more
than
that,
you
talked
about
the
parents
when
kids
are
on
my
Timbit
team
and
I've,
taught
I,
think
or
coached
a
hundred
teams.
In
my
coaching
career,
it's
a
whole
family
thing.
E
You
know
families
come
to
rinks,
they
come
to
ball
diamonds
and
I.
Think
some
days
when
we're
promoting
a
healthy
lifestyle.
We
need
to
remember
that
we're
promoting
healthy
family
lifestyles,
but
you
can't
do
that
without
facilities.
As
you
know,
and
that's
where
you
guys
come
in,
it's
kind
of
build
it
and
they
will
come
I
guarantee
if
you
build
it
and
staff
it
with
the
kind
of
staff
you
have
and
and
your
Watson.
You
have
no
idea
well
I'm.
Maybe
you
do
how
amazing
and
I
mean
exemplary.
E
Amazing,
your
Parks
and
Rec
people
are
your
citywide
allocations
are,
but
especially
the
young
guys
driving
those
Zamboni's
who
throw
extra
naps
out
for
me
who
don't
laugh
when
I've
got
never
mind
those
other
things,
I
bring
out
on
ice
that
are
kind
of
amusing.
If
you
give
me
facilities-
and
if
you
give
me
these
amazing
staff,
I
can
give
you
a
thousand
volunteers
to
run
the
best
programs
you've
ever
seen,
I'd
like
everything
else.
E
Those
facilities
are
tied
to
fiscal
decisions,
and
lately
we
all
know
you
guys
have
had
some
very
tough
fiscal
decisions
to
make.
So
don't
forget
all
those
families
who
want
to
watch
the
kids
play
sports
and
thank
you
again
for
this
tremendous
honor
I
feel
a
little
funny
because
I'm
not
used
to
teachers,
never
get
honors
right.
We
just
were
working
the
class
trying
to
make
everybody
else
look
better,
but
thank
you
again.
G
F
C
Seeing
none
communications
as
presented
response
to
inquiries
as
presented
regrets
councillors,
Thompson
and
to
rush
advisor,
will
be
absent
from
the
council
meeting
of
February
28th
due
to
City
business
they're,
both
at
the
Roma
ogr
a
conference
in
Toronto.
A
motion
introduced
reports,
councillor
Moffat
I
believe
that.
C
C
Yeah
and
I
should
just
remind
colleagues
at
our
March
fedko
meeting,
because
it's
a
long
agenda
and
many
items
of
interest
to
all
members
will
have
the
fedko
meeting
here
in
the
council
chambers.
So
if
you
can
attend
that
meeting,
it
would
be
very
helpful
because
when
you
look
through
the
agenda
item,
there
are
a
number
of
significant
items
that
we're
going
to
be
discussing
and
we
want
to
make
sure
every
member
of
council
has
a
seat
around
the
table.
So
I
thank
my
colleague,
Centuri.
B
We
start
the
agenda
with
the
postponement
and
deferral.
We
have
revision
to
zoning
bylaw,
2008
2,
5,
0,
2,
MN,
permitted
residential
driveway
right
through
our
suburban
communities
and
the
clarify
zoning
language.
So
we
have
two
motion
can
and
one
technical
amendment
one
motion:
one
technical
amendment
can
be
a
decider.
B
B
B
Charcoal
hold
item
will
hold
out
number.
Two
item:
number
three:
the
Byward
market
program;
bylaw
amendment;
okay,
thank
you,
environment
committee
report,
27,
Ottawa,
River
action
plan
status,
update
plan
is
the
item
received
received
and
item
number
four
planning
committee
report
number
65:
a
number:
five
zoning
bylaw
amendment,
medical
marijuana,
production
facilities
like
okay,
descent
and
descent
by
Councilman;
item
number:
six:
zoning,
145,
147,
149,
151,
150,
3
and
155
Meadowlands
Drive
is
that
I
can
carry.
Thank
you.
Zoning
item
number
7
zoning,
1111,
North,
River,
Road
I,
don't
care?
No.
B
H
B
J
B
K
You,
mr.
mayor
mr.
mayor,
you
have
a
couple
more
questions
on
this
and
I
know.
We
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
it.
It's
been
put
off
for
from
one
meeting
to
another
until
some
of
the
some
of
the
issues
and
questions
could
be
resolved,
but
but
I
think
there's
still
unanswered.
Questions
and
I
must
admit
when
this
came
around
the
first
time.
I
thought
this
is
one
way
of
responding
to
an
obvious
issue
and
an
obvious
need,
but
I
think.
K
What's
what's
really
happened
is
you
know
we
set
certain
rules
and
certain
design
in
our
in
our
suburban
areas,
and
then
we
find
out
it
doesn't
work.
So
the
the
reaction
is,
let's
just
let
people
widen
their
driveways
and
obviously
there
are
limits
of
50%
limit,
etc,
but
there
are
impacts
and
for
every
I
guess
for
a
reaction
is
a
reaction.
So
I
got
to
ask
you
again.
I
mentioned
at
the
planning
meeting
I
asked
about
the
the
operational
cost
with
respect
to
snow
storage,
snow
removal,
etc.
There
are
operational
cost.
B
L
Listen
to
the
mayor
with
the
changes
that
we've
made
I
think
the
the
impact
will
be
fairly
minor,
so
we're
only
talking
about
retrofitting.
Existing
properties
and
new
Bilt's
will
be
covered
off
in
another
report.
Building
better
suburbs,
also
with
the
50%
rule
the
neighborhood's
were
getting
most
of
these
issues
are
the
high
density
neighborhoods,
where
they
couldn't.
They
couldn't
meet
that
50%
rule.
In
fact,
oftentimes
their
frontage
doesn't
meet
it
now.
K
Think
that's
a
valid
point.
The
other
issue,
of
course,
is
if,
if
we
create
more
hard
surfaces,
we're
ready
we're
having
some
issues
with
stormwater
runoff
as
it
is,
and
the
more
hard
surfaces
are
pervious
surfaces
that
we're
building
the
greater
the
runoff
probably
is,
and
we
noticed
last
week
in
the
when
we
had
the
the
rainstorm
and
melt
there
were
areas
where
our
storm
sewers
were
backed
up
already.
Has
anybody
given
thought
to
how
this
would
let's
say
worse
in
the
situation.
M
Through
you,
mr.
mayor,
the
50%
limit
on
driveways
has
not
been
changed.
What
has
been
changed
as
the
flexibility
of
where
that
50%
can
be
located
so
strictly
speaking,
in
areas
where
people
will
be
allowed
to
do
this
and
have
that
extra
flexibility?
There
might
be
a
little
extra,
strong
water
impact,
but
that's
already
been
anticipated
in
the
zoning
bylaw
and
the
provision
of
the
50%
width
is
not
being
changed,
but.
K
We're
we're
having
to
go
back
and
recalculate,
for
instance,
stormwater
ponds
that
were
approved
within,
while
since
amalgamation
that
are
no
longer
sufficient
to
hold
to
hold
stormwater
runoff
in
new
communities
and
we're
going
back
and
recalculating.
These
were
approved
by
the
mo
e
built
built
by
either
us
or
developers
on
our
behalf.
So
I
would
think
that
every
additional
drop
of
water
in
there
it
becomes
a
concern
to
us.
N
Mr.
mayor,
yes,
it
does
I
do
recognize
that
I
think
we'll
be
looking.
That
issue
is
one
one's
we'll
be
dealing
with
with,
as
we
move
forward
with
the
you
know,
better,
better
and
smarter
suburbs
project.
We
also
look
when
we,
you
know
we're.
Looking
to
you
know
widen
these
driveways
are
also
looking
at
you
know
using
you
know,
impervious
materials
to
be
able
to
do.
They
have
you
know
other.
You
know
other
countermeasures
that
you
know
don't
just
encourage
the
the
direct
runoff.
N
K
This
is
what
you
can
and
can't
do,
because
most
of
them,
plead
ignorance,
I
mean
they've.
Converted
garages
into
an
extra
room.
They've
widened
the
driveway
in
order
to
accommodate
the
vehicle,
because
there's
no
more
no
longer
garage
and
basically
they
go
well.
Nobody
told
us
that
we
couldn't
do
this.
So
what's
how
do
we
address
that.
M
Mr.
mayor,
we
agree
that
it's
an
ongoing
communication
effort
that
we
have
to
continue
undertaking
and
we
will
be
pursuing
that
as
part
of
the
building
better
suburbs
and
we're
also
having
discussions
with
the
industry
to
make
sure
that
all
of
the
relevant
information
is
incorporated
in
sales
packages.
K
Okay-
and
that
was
gonna-
be
my
next
point
that
we
need
to
put
the
as
places
are
being
sold.
There
has
to
be
an
onus
on
the
the
seller
or
the
developer,
the
Builder
to
ensure
that
that
information
is
in
the
in
the
purchase
agreement
and
that
somehow
it's
highlighted
in
and
I
realized
I
got
a
thousand
clauses
and
they're
not
going
to
see
it.
But
okay
and
I
won't
comment
on
byline
for
parking
byline
force,
because
that's
an
ongoing
issue.
G
Thank
You
mr.
chew
question
on
this.
So
I've
read
the
report.
It's
obviously
not
in
the
urban
area,
but
I
we've
lived,
some
of
those
impacts
of
extended
front-yard,
parkings
and
I
have
key
questions.
So
what
I
understand?
If
the
report
is
that
you
have
your
driveway
and
you
have
a
maximum
of
one
point:
8
meter,
access
to
your
front
door,
basically,
now
we're
allowing
that
to
be
side
by
side
and
we're
allowing
someone
took
Parker
car
I
understand
that
of
the
report.
G
What
I'm
not
clear
about
is
what
we
used
to
allow
and
what
we're
not
allowing
related
to
half
in
the
report
it
says
half
of
the
frontage
can
be
a
driveway,
but
now
there's
appears
to
be
a
subtle
difference
that
it
says
half
of
the
front
yard.
That's
quite
the
difference
from
a
building
frontage
to
a
front
yard
that
can
expand
to
a
to
a
much
wider
percentage
or
much
wider
actual
meter
in
terms
of
a
driver.
Could
you
clarify
for
me
certainly.
M
Mr.
mayor,
through
you,
the
50%
applies
to
the
lot
width
not
to
the
to
the
width
of
the
building
itself,
so
that
is
not
changing
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
you're
quite
right
that
these
proposed
regulations
apply
only
to
the
communities
that
are
outside
the
Greenbelt
to
recognize
unique
circumstances
and
rates
of
car
ownership
that
exists
in
those
communities.
We
would
not
be
applying
the
same
rules
to
the
inside
Greenbelt
area.
H
H
Also,
it's
called
the
crater,
not
stormwater
management
problem,
but
I
will
tell
you
that
I
am
NOT.
I
have
to
be
sanguine
about
widening
the
amount
of
of
car
space
anywhere
I
drove
a
long
one
in
the
core
area
yesterday,
where
we've
constantly
have
to
go
and
take
trucks
to
take
away
the
snow
because
there's
no
place
to
put
it
they've
used,
the
driveway
takes
up
the
driveway
or
parking
supply.
H
As
for
all
parks
in
the
front
lawn-
and
this
has
probably
done
just
as
councillor
blows-
describes
in
innocent
belief
that
they
could
do
whatever
the
heck
they
wanted.
Well,
I
have
here
a
letter
from
one
of
these
citizens
who,
who
said
my
house
at
a
hundred
plus
years
old,
sits
on
a
lot
that
was
subdivided
20
years
ago
and
due
to
the
way
it
was
subbed
that
does
not
have
room
parking
anywhere
other
than
in
the
front
yard.
H
N
Mr.
Merritt
would
need
some
more
details
in
terms
of
where
it
is
the
old
city
of
Ottawa.
Had
you
know
a
detailed
process
in
terms
of
how
you
determine
whether
you've
established
rights
for
front
yard
parking,
there
has
to
be
ability
to
prove
it
was
in
place
before
the
of
the
bylaw
was
in
place.
So
let's
look
at
the
individual
circumstances
and
determine
whether
or
not
they
have
a
right
or
not
to
provide
the
front
yard
parking
on.
H
This
block
alone,
I
would
suggest
that
you
might
have
to
determine
that
for
ninety
percent
of
the
houses
and
that
that
worries
me
a
little
bit
if
we're
going
to
go
after
the
fact
and
trying
to
do
something
about
it.
We
have
enough
problems
trying
to
get
the
bylaws
to
to
deal
with
rural
problems
that
are
the
nice
ones
and
and
I'm
really
surprised
that
you
have
the
roads
person
with
you
today
in
these
meadows
filling
potholes.
But
that's
enough.
O
Thank
You
counselor
one
of
the
problems
of
this
one.
Of
course
it's
not
really
going
to
resolve
the
problems
of
parking
in
the
areas
where
the
parking
is
the
worst,
which
is
the
townhouse
areas
and
I
just
was
wondering
how
and
that's
where
we
get
a
lot
of
complaints.
I'm
sure
you
do
as
well,
because
there
isn't
space
for
the
snow
there
isn't
pace
to
park,
there's
some
space
and
people.
We
don't
have
bus
service
in
many
of
these
areas,
so
they
say
people
are
supposed
to
take
transit.
O
Well,
you
can't
take
transit
if
the
transits
not
there
or
if
you
have
to
walk
for
30
minutes
to
get
to
the
transit.
Not
many
people
in
the
wintertime
are
going
to
do
that.
So
it's
an
interim
I'm,
really
more
interested
in,
what's
going
to
come
forward
in
the
fall
with
the
new
standards
for
the
the
in
development
outside
the
green
or
new
areas
at
least,
but
we
could
try
to
put
it.
O
You
can't
I
think
anymore
and
the
city
has
this
fixation
about
people
taking
transit
and
doesn't
want
to
provide
a
lot
of
parking
areas.
But
if
you
haven't
got
the
transit
when
the
new
areas
and
we
don't,
then
we've
got
to
have
sufficient
space
for
cars.
We
don't
have
this
problem
in
the
future,
as
in
50%
of
a
townhouse
area,
it's
not
going
to
allow
them
to
double
their
driveway
wide
they're.
Not
that
wide
interesting.
O
What's
going
to
happen,
the
ones
that
have
already
gone
in
and
virtually
paved
their
entire
front
yard
I
know
by
law,
have
waited
to
deal
with
this.
Is
this
going
to
be
something
they're
going
to
take
up
afterwards
or
how
we're
going
to
deal
with
the
problems
that
already
exists
where
people
obscenity
legally?
Does
anybody
have
an
answer
to
that.
O
P
Mais
excuse
news
that
Angela
modifications
were
adaptee
may
post
KDK
in
second
person
who
saw
as
faulty
a
sample
sir
new
servant
pretty
mr.
country
it
will
fit
so
nautical
can
explain
the
spot.
The
person
was
playing
about
was
it
exact
as
Caribbean
Syria,
United
Nation
Baku,
the
nation
attendees
across
a
problem.
Just
a
convertible
tank
possible
may
see
deep
inner
circle
phone
I
said
over
TV
love.
What
so
that
we
may
live
wassup
attract
attention,
Empire!
P
O
New
policy
and
in
a
townhouse
area,
I,
don't
see
much
happening
at
all
because
of
the
width
of
lots
and
people
are
asking
me,
you
know
how
wide
is:
are
a
lot,
etc,
etc.
So
I
think
there
may
be
some
need
to
have
some
information
going
out
to
the
public
and
making
it
very
clear,
I've
told
people
once
this
is
passed,
they
can
go
on
the
website
and
get
the
information
to
do
that.
So
I'm
hoping
that
very
soon
we'll
have
a
section
of
the
website
that
will
say
rules
about
widening
the
driveways
etc.
O
M
O
So
they
because
I
know
it's
not
a
permit
type
of
thing,
but
there
should
be
as
something
that
they
have
to,
because
we're
talking
about
materials
use
all
of
that
type
of
thing
and
like
I,
have
one
right
now,
people
said
they
put
gravel
down
and
then,
when
they
have
the
company
that
comes
there
snow
blower
to
blow
out
their
blowing
they've
actually
damage
the
neighbor's
car
with
it
because
they
blow
the
travel
too.
So
it's
all
sorts
of
things
out
there
absolutely.
Q
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
two
questions.
Firstly
with
with
the
various
departments
talking
during
the
adjournment
period
that
we
had
since
this
last
came
to
two
committee
or
the
council.
Rather,
is
there
any
thought
that
this
kind
of
approach
would
be
expanded
to
other
parts
of
the
city?
In
other
words,
are
the
neighborhoods
within
the
Greenbelt
with
if
a
similar
request
came
forward,
that
you'd
we'll
get
at
doing
that
at.
Q
And
the
second
question
is
the
proposal
that
initially
came
forward
was
was
quite
a
bit
broader
than
this,
and
then
operations
and
planning
spoke
about
sort
of
a
retrofit
approach
approach
which
is
what's
before
us
today.
Is
this,
though,
only
an
interim
discussion
or
decision
that
we're
making
and
when
the
building,
better
suburbs
or
whatever
the
program?
Are
we
going
to
have
this
discussion
all
over
again
and
are
we
still
going
to
be
facing
the
same
cost
I'm?
Q
Assuming
that
that
operation
said
this
works
because
there's
not
going
to
be
that
much
of
an
increased
cost?
But
are
we
going
to
be
having
the
same
discussion
six
months
from
now
or
whenever
that
report
comes
forward
at
looking
at
doing
it
more
broad-based,
as
as
was
set
out
in
the
original
proposal,
the.
M
Objective
mr.
mayor
of
the
building
better
suburbs
study
is
to
avoid
this
type
of
logistical
challenges
from
the
word
go
when
a
new
community
is
developed,
so
we
will
be
having
a
discussion
that,
as
we
intend
we'll
make
sure
that
we
tackle
these
logistical
questions
for
that
right
at
construction.
We
don't
have
to
deal
with
the
types
of
situations
that
we're
now
having
to
come
back
and
address
so.
Q
M
Q
F
R
We've
seen
with
the
end
of
the
LES
mine
isn't
so
much
a
question
as
a
comment
on
this
issue.
I
think
this
report,
this
recommendation,
finds
a
an
uneasy
compromise.
I
think
the
point
that
I
really
want
to
make
is
that
the
question
of
finding
adequate
parking
on
your
own,
a
lot
on
your
own
site,
is
something
that
people
wherever
they
live
in
the
city
will
face
and
people's
needs
change.
You
purchase
a
home
or
rent
a
home,
knowing
how
much
parking
comes
with
it.
R
But
if
your
needs
change
substantially,
you
have
a
couple
of
options.
One
is
you
find
alternative
arrangements
for
that
vehicle?
The
other
is
that
you
move
to
a
place
that
provides
additional
parking,
but
we
cannot
be
in
a
position
as
a
city
to
keep
accommodating
on
the
site:
loss
of
green
space,
loss
of
permeability,
of
the
rain
water
loss
of
snow
storage,
etc,
and
on
street
parking
when
people's
needs
for
additional
vehicles
continue
to
grow.
There
has
to
be
another
way
than
loading
the
site
with
vehicles
and
I.
R
Think
that's
this
isn't
inside
the
Greenbelt
outside
the
issue.
It's
something
we're
facing
in
all
our
neighborhoods,
so
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
where
we're
at
now
in
terms
of
the
recommendations
here,
and
certainly
we
we
all
look
forward
to
both
the
better
suburbs,
getting
the
title
quite
right,
work
and
report,
as
well
as
those
of
us
with
in
the
urban
core,
due
to
the
ongoing
work
we're
doing
with
with
infill
guidelines
and
parking
issues
there.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
thank
you,
so
we
have
in
front
of
us
one
technical
amendment
moved
by
Councillor,
hopely,
yeah
I'm,
coming
to
your
conne
system,
and
we
have
technical
amendment
moved
by
Councillor,
hubli
and
seconded
by
Councillor
bleh
councillor.
Hopefully,
if
you
would
like
to
read
their
breed
is
resolved
because
the
respond
was
in
the
procedures
memo,
but
we
let
you
read
that,
therefore
it
leads
off
and
we
can
carry
directly.
Okay,
therefore
be
resolved
at
the
private
approach
by
lobbying
by
law
to
zero
zero.
B
Three
four
four
seven,
as
amended,
be
further
amended
by
repealing
section
five
and
substituting.
Therefore,
the
following
no
permit
shall
be
issued
for
a
private
approach,
the
purpose
of
which
is
to
provide
access
to
a
parking
space,
one
which
is
contrary
to
any
city
bylaw
or
to
created
by
an
amendment
in
the
zoning
bylaw
to
zero
zero.
Eight,
two:
five:
zero
subsection
one
zero
seven
bracket,
three
brackets
see
the
february
26
2014,
which
allows
an
additional
one
point:
eight
meter
of
parking
space
in
the
outer
suburban
area
shown
as
area
a
on
schedule.
B
Three
one:
eight
of
the
zoning
bylaw
Thank
You.
Mr.
chairman,
that
this
is
in
them-
and
this
is
from
stuff-
yes,
so
can
we
carry
the
technical
amendment?
Okay,
thank
you.
Now
we
have.
We
have
a
motion
from
moved
by
Councillor
hard,
a
second
by
council
carry
council.
How
do
you
want
speak
to
it
briefly?
B
J
Thank
you,
I'm,
actually
surprised
that
so
much
thought
and
effort
and
angst
has
had
to
go
into
this.
It's
really
is
uniquely
a
suburban
issue,
and
it's
one
that,
as
you've
heard
from
staff,
really
has
not
we're
not
changing
we're
just
defining
and
we're
doing
that
in
advance
of
the
whole
suburban
building,
better
suburbs
project
coming
forward,
which
will
be
finalized
in
November
of
this
year.
J
They
were
being
told
that
it
was
illegal
to
do
so.
So
this
isn't
coming
forward
in
advance
because
of
the
situation
with
by
law.
I
also
want
to
tell
those
of
you
around
the
table,
who
absolutely
don't
represent
any
kind
of
suburbia
and
yet
try
to
understand,
as
we
do
try
to
understand
the
the
more
urban
issues
or
they're.
Rural
issues,
in
fact,
is
that
we
don't
have
access
to
the
same
opportunities
that
you
do
and
for
the
past
two
winters,
councilor,
Kadri
and
I
have
met
with
these.
J
J
This
is
about
allowing
people
to
to
enjoy
their
own
properties
in
a
livable
fashion
to
the
best
we
can,
and
I
really
am
I
really
quite
honestly
was
ticked
off
when
this
became
about
winter
Oh
operations,
because
we
have
so
much
snow
this
year,
I,
don't
think
the
same
consideration
and
when,
when
it
happened,
I
called
mr.
Wiley
and
I
said
Kevin.
You
know
that,
right
now,
when
people
have
no
option
but
to
park
on
the
street,
you
have
zero
capacity
for
snow
zero.
J
This
way
when
Roger
and
his
team
goes
out
to
the
suburban
areas
in
the
West
and
South
End
and
ends
and
gives
out
tickets
and
says
you're
not
allowed
to
do
this,
I
can
stand
up
any
of
the
suburban
councillors
can
stand
up
and
say
you
now
have
an
option.
You
didn't
take
the
option
and
because
you
didn't
take
the
option,
that's
what's
going
to
happen,
we
absolutely
could
have
a
firmer
line
on
on
where
that
we
stand
through
the
building.
J
Better
suburbs
process
by
laws
and
policies
that
were
approved,
citywide
are
going
to
be
recommended
for
change.
Just
yesterday
we
had
some
of
us
had
a
small
gathering,
councillor
Kadri
and
I,
some
of
the
development
industry
asking
them.
How
can
we
work
with
you
to
build
a
different
suburban
product
that
that
captures
the
densities
that
we
need
that
protects
the
urban
boundary
expansion,
but
does
it
differently
so
people
can
live
in
these
communities?
We're
having
you
build,
that's
where
the
building
better
suburbs
is
going.
J
That's
I
can
promise
you
that
we
are
going
to
be
bold
and
we're
going
to
be
strong
and
with
the
support
of
chair
Hume
and
the
mayor,
which
I
know,
we
have
watch
out
you're
going
to
see
some
interesting
things
that
are
going
to
make
our
city
a
better
place
to
live.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
hope,
you'll
take
what
I
said
into
consideration.
Thank.
J
J
S
You
your
worship,
his
question
recently
on
a
radio
broadcast.
The
mayor
indicated
that
he
and
others
had
met
with
you
and
discussed
reducing
the
number
of
times
that
we
do
actual
snow
removal
from
those
the
the
roadside
in
order
to
reduce
costs
and
that
in
fact,
this
year
we
were
reducing
the
number
of
times
we
do
snow
removal
to
reduce
costs.
Well,
if
we
can
do
that,
then
how
can
a
foot
beside
a
driveway
have
anywhere
near
that
impact.
L
Through
the
mayor,
I
think,
as
I
stated
that
the
bylaws
that's
written
now
won't
have
much
impact
it's
fairly
minimal,
but
even
before
our
concern
was
that,
if
you
had
new
builds
where
you
made
this
the
design
standard,
we
would
be
losing
great
tracts
of
ability
to
store
snorts
to
stow
store
stowage
store.
So.
L
L
S
B
Kate
Thank
You
Cal,
so
charlie.
Now
we
carry
the
amendment
now
we
need
to
carry
the
motion
moved
by
Councillor
hardware.
Second,
by
counsel
cadre
is
there
motion
care,
okay,
dissent,
dissent
from
cancer
clock.
Now
we
have
three
dissents
so
eight
years
and
it's
been
calm,
okay,
gazing
has
been
common
clue.
I
E
B
A
B
P
Point
I
wanted
to
make
some
points.
I
didn't
have
the
opportunity
to
mention
that
the
committee
had
to
leave,
but
this
is
not
really
questions
for
Aaron
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
group.
It
did
a
lot
of
good
work.
I
think
we're
on
the
right
path
in
terms
of
providing
capabilities
to
young
people
who
have
a
low-income
family,
so
I
think
it's
very
very
clear.
P
Now
there
are
many
residents
and
groups
that
approached
me
asking
specifically
if
francophones
services
would
be
maintained
through
the
transition,
I
had
many
discussions
with
Aaron
and
other
city
staff
and
I'm
very
pleased
in
terms
of
representation.
It
won't
be
necessarily
a
guaranteed
percentage,
but
if
a
child
is
francophone
and
is
eligible
for
services,
we'll
be
able
to
ensure
that
the
services
are
provided
in
French,
so
percentages
will
vary
according
to
the
number
of
children
and
services
that
are
available.
P
So
with
that
transition,
I
think
Aaron.
You
can
maintain
it.
It
won't
be
easy
because
you're
changing
the
whole
system,
but
I
think
that
the
objective
is
clear:
the
family
that
has
access
to
something
that
is
really
needed,
and
if
they
are
low
income,
they
will
have
access
to
child
care
services,
and
thank
you
for
your
work
and
in
reassuring
the
community
in
terms
of
francophone
services
and
I,
expect
also
and
to
have
an
annual
report
on
what's
happening
in
your
area.
Thank
you.
S
S
Certainly,
although
they've
been
doing
tremendous
work
on
this
file-
and
it's
obviously
a
very
difficult
one-
one
that's
near
and
dear
to
a
lot
of
parents,
hearts
and
we're
talking
about
child
care,
but
also
our
stakeholder
panel
and
the
expert
panel
that
have
been
convened
to
help
guide
us
through
this
modernization
and
across
the
four
community
consultations
and
the
web
survey.
I
want
to
thank
the
over
600
parents
who
participated
in
helping
to
craft
what
will
be
the
future
for
child
care,
at
least
as
far
as
the
city
of
Ottawa's
portion
is
concerned.
S
So
I
didn't
want
to
take
that
opportunity
to
thank
them
and
thank
them
for
their
patience,
but
also
as
we
move
forward
in
a
very
managed
and
pragmatic
fashion,
crafting
a
child
care
plan.
That's
representative,
not
just
of
the
realities
that
we
live
in,
but
also
the
values
that
we
cherish
here
in
Ottawa.
So,
thank
you
very
much
to
all
the
folks
who've
helped
and
will
help
it
over
the
next
coming
several
years
as
we
continue
to
guide
through
this.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
Rock
America
Thank.
B
B
I
The
report
from
the
C
clerk
and
solicitor
entitled
status,
update
council
inquiries,
emotions
for
a
period
ending
21st
February
2014
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
purport
29
Environment
Committee
report,
27
planning
community
board
65
a
and
Transit
Commission
report
24.
If
you
received
and
adopted
as
amended,
okay.
B
I
T
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
acting
chair,
as
has
become
my
tradition
with
councillor
Wilkinson.
This
motion
asked
that
we
declare
March
8
2014
to
be
International,
Women's
Day
in
the
City
of
Ottawa,
and
just
just
a
couple
of
words
on
this
and
the
first
International
Women's
Day
was
held
in
1911
and
in
1977.
The
United
Nations,
officially
called
for
all
countries
to
mark
a
day
for
the
recognition
of
women's
economic,
political
and
social
achievements
and
I
can
tell
you
from
my
vantage
point.
T
Although
women
have
certainly
come
a
long
way
in
their
struggle
for
equality,
you
just
need
look
around
this
council
table
to
see
that
we're
not
there
yet
and
I
do
believe
that
we
need
to
continue
to
make
strides
toward
a
color
equality,
not
just
in
a
political
forum
but
in
all
aspects
of
life
and
so
I.
Ask
my
colleagues
to
accept
the
motion
and
declare
March
8th
2014
is
International
Women's
Day
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
I.
B
Can
carry
and
Thank
You
councillor
Dean
for
taking
the
lead
on
this
item
for
many
years
on
council.
Thank
you
very
much
there
other
council
that
motion.
We
have
motion
moved
by
Councillor
blazer
by
council
to
rush
who's.
The
second
donor
power
you
can
circus
acrobat
councillor
clerk
councillor
play.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
a
motion?
Thank.
S
You
very
much
mr.
deputy
mayor,
I'm
sure
everyone
around
this
table
would
agree
that
motorists
who
pass
stopped
school
buses,
whose
stop
sign
is
deployed
in
lights,
are
flashing,
commits
an
egregious
act
that
endangers
the
lives
of
both
children
and
and
the
pedestrians
and
those
who
are
who
are
caring
for
them.
This
motion
that
calls
for
the
the
provincial
government
to
make
the
various
changes
to
the
legislation
to
allow
for
cameras
to
be
installed
on
the
stop
arms
of
school
buses
similar
to
a
red-light
camera
which
would
allow
the
police
to
enforce
this.
B
A
Very
much
mr.
chair,
this
is
a
motion
regarding
the
building
on
Bank
and
Somerset.
That
has
been
such
a
matter
of
contention
for
so
many
years,
and
the
BIA
in
particular
is
very
anxious
to
get
work
started
on
renovating
this
building.
The
owner
does
by
heritage
buildings
in
the
city
and
renovates
them
and
restores
them
one
of
the
few
people
who
does
that
so
he's
to
be
commended
for
working
on
this
building?
A
He's
done
other
buildings
in
the
area
I'm
very
interested
in
getting
to
work
this
spring
on
the
outside,
while
he
negotiates
on
the
inside
with
a
potential
tenant
and
gets
to
work
on
those
detailed
design
drawings.
But
this
is
to
help
show
our
willingness
and
port
for
him
working
on
this
building
and
to
try
and
get
the
hoarding
down
as
soon
as
possible.
Okay,.
B
I
I
B
N
Thank
You
mr.
deputy
mayor,
can
we
have
a
knee?
Can
you
receive
a
full,
rational
and
yoc
transport?
Buses
are
not
required
to
stop
at
all
railway
roller
lines,
easy
decision
based
on
route,
timing
or
financial
reasons
and
there.
So
what
would
be
the
impacts
of
changing
that
roles
so
that
buses
are
required
to
stop
an
armed
robbery
lines
such
as
is
done
and
in
gatineau
Thank
You?
Mr.
Thank
You.
P
A
client
has
a
problem
with
the
presto
card
should
they
address
it
with
a
customer
service
at
the
OC
Transpo,
and
can
customer
service
respond
to
all
the
needs
in
terms
of
the
card
and,
if
there's
a
problem
with
the
card,
while
on
the
bus,
does
the
driver
have
the
discretion
to
less
the
client
and
get
into
the
bus?
Thank
you.