►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - 24 May 2017 10 am
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Yours
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
on
behalf
of
the
auto,
our
key
lands,
Development
Corporation
and
supporter
directors.
It's
my
pleasure
to
share
with
you
the
annual
report
for
2016.
This
Corporation
was
established
to
take
parcels
a
city-owned
land
that
had
drill
a
potential
and
meet
our
objectives
of
providing
a
financial
return
to
the
city
while
meeting
the
social,
environmental
and
cultural
needs
of
communities.
The
corporation
consists
of
a
board
and
staff
is
shown
on
the
slide
just
there.
B
So
our
highlights
in
2016
in
2016,
we
had
marketed
five
properties
for
sale.
This
is
Griffin
amount
of
time
was
involved
in
preparing
a
number
of
projects,
be
ready
for
market
and
in
spite
of
the
market
conditions,
where
you
secured
two
agreements
for
3071
Riverside
Drive
and
were
1435
Randall
Avenue,
which
recently
closed
in
2017
and
we're
currently
negotiating
on
21:40
baseline.
B
The
31-7
Lake
one
Riverside
Drive
property
was
a
surplus
school
site
acquired
by
the
city
in
2008,
just
frontage,
along
Riverside
Drive,
and
meet
the
officer
community's
Bay
a
beach
and
park.
Approximately
four
point:
two
nine
eight
hectares,
1435
Randall
was
a
cleaned-up
former
water
main
tower
site
that
has
been
decommissioned
and
dismantled.
The
site
is
surrounded
by
Alta
Vista
fire
station
and
single
detached
dwellings
to
the
south
and
west
of
Elmwood.
Nonprofit,
Development
and
2148
baseline
is
a
former
world
Alice.
B
That
was
originally
a
non-viable
parcel
that
made
viable
through
road
closings,
including
removal
and
relocation
of
utility
Solan.
They
also
have
part
of
long
fills
project.
A
block
of
land
that
was
transferred
to
the
city's
affordable
housing
branch
was
under
development.
This
year,
the
city
at
the
branch
partner,
with
multi-faith
housing
initiative
and
began
construction
of
the
Haven
and
2015,
which
continued
into
2016
and
it's
anticipated
to
be
completed
in
2017.
The
Haven
will
provide
ninety
eight
units
assist
in
meeting
the
city's,
affordable
housing
needs.
Mr.
B
mayor
and
members
of
council
were
committed
to
promoting
community
improvements
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
does
not
based
not
only
on
the
financial
rewards
but
to
contribute
to
the
social,
environmental
and
cultural
needs
of
communities.
Hence
were
committed
to
this
on
the
sale
of
surplus
property
to
achieving
optimal
value,
relateable,
financial
and
non-financial
community
values,
and
that's
where
they
Haven
comes
into
this
one.
This
year
we
have
closed
on
two
agreements
and
secured
in
2016
and
negotiated
one
closed
later.
B
B
They
may
have
mentioned
that
the
the
2016
amount
of
money
we
had
attended
to
raise
in
2016
actually
was
didn't
come
in
until
2017
and
we've
just
worked
with
the
finance
department
so
that
it
it
it's
taken
into
account
as
a
receivable,
so
that
the
objective
we've
had
in
recent
raising
funds
for
the
city
has
were
actually
surpassing
where
we
are
had
intended
to
be
at
this
point
in
time.
Are
there
any
questions
myself,
Fort
McNair
is
a
happy
to
answer
them
as
well.
Thank.
A
C
C
Certainly,
my
knowledge
about
this
Corporation
has
increased
over
the
last
year
and
the
last
couple
years
with
the
property
on
Riverside
Drive,
which
is
in
reward,
and
now
that
the
property
has
been
sold
working
with
the
new
proponent
that
certainly
made
members
of
the
community
more
aware
what
the
corporation
does,
and
it's
also
highlighted
some
issues
with
the
corporation
that
need
to
be
addressed.
That's
certainly
not
for
today,
but
I
did
have
some
questions
I'm
just
trying
to
find
here
in
my
in
my
booklet
here
the
here.
It
is
your
presentation.
C
So,
first
of
all,
I
don't
expect
answers
today,
but
I'd
like
to
put
my
questions
on
the
record
and
if
I
could
get
a
reply
back
in
the
next
month
or
so
that
would
be
great.
I've
read
your
report
in
full
the
annual
report
and
you
talked
about
the
strategic
directions
or
your
objectives
as
a
corporation
there's
about
10
of
them.
C
On
page
four
that
are
listed
and
when
I
consider
the
property
at
3071,
Riverside
Drive,
which
has
gone
through
a
very
lengthy
process
and
has
in
itself
raised
a
number
of
questions
in
the
community,
I
would
like
to
know
you
talk
about
maximizing
financial,
social,
environmental
and
cultural
sustainability.
I
know
that
the
financial
component
has
been
realized,
but
I'd
like
to
know
for
the
Riverside
Drive
property,
how
you've
maximized
the
social,
environmental
and
cultural
sustainability
of
that
property.
C
As
you
know,
a
decade
ago,
a
a
concept
plan
was
community,
led
council
approved
and
some
changes
to
that
concept
were
incorporated
and
sort
of
go
against
the
overall
community
objectives
or
the
community-led
plan
that
was
approved
a
decade
ago.
So
I
don't
want.
To
put
you
on
the
spot
today
and
ask
how
those
points
have
been
met,
but
I
want
to
get
those
questions
on
the
record
and
have
an
answer.
So
I
can
go
back
to
my
community,
which
has
raised
some
significant
questions
through
this
process.
Thank
you.
A
C
C
E
With
regards
to
our
municipalities
that
surround
us,
we
have
a
mutual
aid,
mutual
aid
agreements
or
formal
agreement
signed
often
Ottawa.
Fires
responds
because
of
our
specialties
particular
has
a
mat
and
rescue
capabilities
of
an
urban
center
like
Ottawa,
and
those
costs
are
recover
as
part
of
the
mutual
aid
agreement
and.
E
C
C
Us,
okay
and
on
page
five
staff
have
provided
a
very
helpful
table
illustrating
calls
comparing
2015
over
2016.
There
was
a
few
points
here
that
certainly
drew
my
attention
and
I
would
like
to
ask
some
follow-up
questions.
One
is
regarding
the
volume
of
false
alarms,
which
I
think
is
significant.
In
2016,
there
were
eight
thousand
seven
hundred
and
twenty
one
false
alarms
that
the
OFS
responded
to
for
chronic
addresses
that
have
false
alarms,
what
type
of
steps
the
auto-fire
service
take
to
educate
or
even
charge.
These
addresses
for
these
chronic
false
alarms
now.
E
There
is
follow-up
on
those
and
we'll
follow
up
more
specifically
with
unifier
chief
counselor,
but
we
do
have
a
process
by
which
we
analyze
those
calls.
There
is
follow-up
with
our
prevention
officers,
because
that
is
an
important
component
as
you're
right
there.
There
are
numerous
false
alarms,
one
has
to
remember
it's
applying
balance
and
the
fire
chief
o
or
stated
at
several
times
publicly
when
one
smells
Heath
or
smoke,
etc.
We
want
to
encourage
people
to
call
often
those
afterwards
are
classified
as
false
alarms.
E
C
E
Mara,
this
is
directly
related.
We
have
a
tiered
response
agreement
and
the
medical
calls.
Obviously
it's
the
paramedic
services,
the
the
prime
agency,
but
we
also
a
police
and
fire
on
specific
categories
of
calls
where
their
skills
can
be
brought
to
bear
and
assist
us
in
saving
of
life.
This
attracts
similar
to
what
we're
seeing
in
the
paramedic
report.
I
believes
coming
to
our
next
committee.
You'll,
see
that
they've
had
year
over
year
increases
similar.
So
there's
nothing
specific
here.
That
is
more
outstanding.
C
It
really
is
a
great
program
and
I
just
like
to
encourage
not
members
of
the
committee,
but
all
of
Council
if
you
can
get
away
this
summer
and
attend
here
with
an
Ottawa
to
do
that.
My
question,
though,
is
regarding
the
number
of
women
in
the
Ottawa
Fire
Service
16
new
recruits
were
hired
and
began
training
in
the
spring
of
April
of
26:17.
How
is
the
auto
fire
service
doing
in
recruiting
and
retaining
female
firefighters?
There.
E
It
is
the
priority
of
this
fire
chief
that
he's
named
it
publicly
that
the
recruitment
of
women
and
increasing
the
diversity
of
the
service,
as
well
as
mental
health,
as
two
priorities
on
this
one
in
particular,
the
fire
service
in
Ottawa,
has
been
finding
multiple
opportunities
to
try
to
encourage
and
bring
women
into
the
fire
service.
Certainly
it's
a
it's
a
challenge
we
recruit
based
on
people
leaving
us,
etc.
So
the
numbers
yearly
as
we
increase.
It
is
a
challenge
across
the
country,
but
it's
something
that
we're
focused
on
camp.
E
C
You
and
I'll
just
note.
My
final
comment
is:
we've
had
some
graduates
from
this
camp
who
have
gone
on
to
become
firefighters,
not
just
in
other
jurisdictions,
but
here
in
Ottawa,
which
is
a
great
thing,
your
worship.
Thank
you
for
that
opportunity
again,
thank
you
to
the
men
and
women
of
the
auto
Fire
Service
who
serve
this
great
city.
Thank
you.
No.
C
Thank
you.
Your
worship
I'm
getting
my
money's
worth
here
this
morning,
my
yes,
so
for
the
again
for
this
review,
which
I
appreciate
Ottawa
bylaw
services,
which
led
this
over
the
last
couple
months
and
the
significant
participation
that
members
of
the
public
provided
not
just
at
public
sessions
that
were
hosted
by
the
book,
but
also
by
the
online
survey,
which
collected
a
significant
amount
of
feedback
noise,
like
many
other
words,
is
a
significant
issue.
C
In
my
ward,
we
have
a
significant
number
of
special
events
and
festivals
and
River
wards
and
the
most
festivals
and
special
events
of
any
Ward
outside
the
downtown
core.
We
happily
embrace
festivals
and
special
events,
and
we
have
a
many
years
of
working
with
them
collaboratively
to
address
various
solutions.
This
survey
that
auto
by
law
conducted,
talked
about
the
base
noise,
which
has
been
a
problem
for
years
emanating
from
some
festivals
and
special
events
in
a
certainly
one.
C
That
is
an
issue
in
River,
Wars
and
so
I'm,
happy
that
it
is
addressed
in
this
report
and
will
be
addressed
going
forward.
I
know
it's
not
an
easy
component
of
noise
to
measure
but
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
within
the
report.
How
this
is
going
to
be
done
going
forward?
How
will
you
measure
and
enforce
the
base
noise
component,
because,
when
I
have
read
the
draft
bylaw
that
is
proposed
here,
which
is
attached
as
document
one,
it
says
no
person
shall
cause
or
permit
any
base
noise.
C
Unusual
noise
are
noise
likely
to
disturb
the
inhabitants
of
the
city.
I
think
we
have
to
expect
that
there
will
be
some
base
noise,
but
I'm,
certainly
looking
for
those
extreme
cases
that
cause
significant
unrest
and
disturbance
to
residents
who
live
beside
these
festivals.
So
I
see
the
chief
of
bylaws
here
I'd
like
to
know
what
the
plan
is
to
met
and
enforce
base
noise
going
forward.
F
Sorry
through
you
America,
currently
the
provision
of
the
bylaw
that
we
use
to
enforce
base
noise.
Is
there
section
2
of
the
viola?
It's
a
general
noise
provision,
the
problem
that
we've
had
recently
when
we're
before
the
courts
is
that
we've
been
challenged
to
whether
beast
noise,
because
it's
not
specifically
addressed
in
in
the
provision
as
we've,
we
haven't
been
successful
with
our
charges.
F
So
what
were
what
we're
recommending
here
is
is
that
we
amend
the
section
2
to
specifically
include
base
noise
and
clearly
defined
based
noise
as
being
a
low-frequency
noise
as
well
as
vibration.
So
when
we
get
complaints
about
base
noise
or
noise
in
general,
when
we
go
into
people's
units-
or
you
know
from
the
point
of
reception
taking
the
meter
readings
often
base
nice
doesn't
show
up
on
the
on
our
meter,
so
it
may
show
is
no
violation,
so
less
than
65
decibels
of
an
exemptions
in
place.
F
But
it's
obvious
to
us
when
we
go
into
their
unit
that
pictures
are
vibrating
on
the
wall
or
things
are.
You
know
vibrating
on
the
table.
Things
like
that.
So
it's
obvious
to
us
that
there
is
a
violation:
there
is
a
disturbance
to
the
neighbor.
So
at
that
point
we
can
now
issue
a
charge
if
possible,
but
I
also
like
to
mention
that
you
know
previous
calls
that
we've
had
with
involving
festivals
and
event.
F
Organizers,
we've
had
great
collaboration
with
them,
and
it's
they've
been
very
responsive
to
our
concerns
about
base
noise
in
the
communities
and
have
done
everything
possible
to
try
and
reduce
base
noise
where
possible.
So
we'll
continue
those
efforts
with
those
organizers,
but
in
extreme
cases
where,
where
we're
not
getting
compliance,
at
least
now
it's
clear
it's
it's
specific
in
the
in
the
provision
that
we
go
ahead
and
issue
the
charge.
Thank.
C
C
The
other
question
I
wanted
to
raise
was
not
regarding
base
noise,
but
snow
clearing
operators
and
again
I
understand
the
need
to
allow
this
service
to
be
conducted
in
the
evenings
and
through
the
night.
We
want
to
make
sure
our
roads
and
parking
lots
on
private
property
are
cleared,
but
for
residential
communities
that
neighbor
government
complexes
shopping
strip
malls
that
can't
be
cleared
during
the
day
because
they
have
staff
or
patrons
there
who
have
to
clear
at
night.
There
has
been
ongoing
concerns
in
certain
sections
of
my
noise
bin.
C
Above
my
ward,
about
the
operators
who
operate
at
night.
Is
there
any
way
that
we
can
work
together
after
today
to
look
at
solutions
where
we
don't
give
a
24
hour,
carte
blanche
authority
to
these
operators,
but
try
and
streamline
whether
they
do
it
between
6:00
p.m.
and
midnight
or
even
6
p.m.
at
1:00?
But
through
the
night?
These
ongoing
challenges,
particularly
in
winters
where
we
have
a
lot
of
snow
and
the
impact
it
has
on
residents?
Is
there
anything
that
you
can
suggest?
F
Yes
mayor,
so
we
did
consider
several
options
regulating
snow
clearing
and
snow
removal
noise
in
the
wee
hours
of
the
night
in
reviewing
public
opinion
research
that
we
did
as
well
as
the
online
survey
that
we
did.
It
was
clear
that
residents,
although
had
comments
about
different
noise
created
from
the
snow
clearing
operation,
specifically
the
the
backup
beepers.
F
We
felt
that
the
we
had
a
clear
message
from
from
the
residents
of
Ottawa
that
it
was
more
important
to
have
these
streets
and
and
public
the
parking,
lots
and
things
plowed
and
through
the
night
to
ensure
safety
and
mobility
for
the
residents
in
the
morning.
But
we
did,
we
did
discover,
what's
called
a
broadband
backup
paper,
so
we
are
doing
some
further
research
on
that
and
actually
have
a
council
or
a
committee
directive
to
to
explore
that
that
option
further.
F
C
I
mean
I,
certainly
work
with
property
managers
and
and
other
people
who
are
in
charge
of
snow
clearing
to
work
out
some
sort
of
possible
solutions,
but
when
you
have
a
bylaw
in
place
that
gives
them
24-hour
access.
Some
of
these
challenges
do
come
up,
so
I
wanted
to
to
raise
that,
and
maybe
I
can
work
with
you
offline
again
on
that
matter.
But
again,
I
wanted
to
thank
Ottawa
bylaw
staff
for
conducting
this
review.
C
G
You
mr.
mayor
I
was
at
committee
for
all
of
the
discussion
that
happened
around
the
noise,
bylaw
and
well
I
had
a
staff
to
look
at
a
7:00,
8:00
or
9:00
a.m.
time
for
construction
starts
on
Saturday
that
that
wasn't
successful,
emotion
didn't
get
through
through
committee,
but
I
do
you
know
I
think
that
I
feel
like
I,
do
need
to
point
out
that
you
know
noise
happens
more
in
areas
and
noise
complaints
are
generated
in
areas
where
people
you
know
live
closer
together.
G
G
Sorry
I've
never
been
accused
of
not
speaking
loud
enough.
That's
odd
for
me!
Here
I
go
so
you
know
for
Ward
12,
for
example,
there
were
307
noise
complaints
for
my
ward
263
and
that
you
know
that
compares
with
you
know
five
for
some
8/3
is
I,
think
the
lowest.
So
it's
you
know,
I
think
that
and
I
don't
you
know
we
can't
blame
this
on
festivals,
I,
get
very
few
complaints
about
Blues,
Fest
anymore
I
get
none
about
glow
fair.
So
this
is,
you
know,
general
noise.
G
So
you
know
in
in
my
office
alone,
I
get
people
residents
calling
me
anytime.
There's
construction
happening
in
their
neighborhood
almost
daily,
and
so
it
would
have
been
nice
to
give
people
a
9:00
a.m.
start
on.
Saturday
I
thought
that
two
hours
a
week
to
let
people
arrest
wasn't
asking
for
too
much,
but
I
think
that
going
forward
I
would
like
to
and
I
do
have
an
inquiry
which
I
will
read
out
at
the
the
end
of
council
meeting
when
when
we
go
through
enquiries
but
essentially
and
I
worked
with
staff
on
this.
G
You
know
be
just
having
that.
Having
that
flexibility
having
that
leverage
with
whoever
the
developers
the
Builder
is
a
contractor,
is
it
allows
me
to
work
on
behalf
of
my
residents
us
to
work
on
behalf
of
our
residents
to
make
sure
that
that
they're
able
to
live
with
you
know
some
mitigation
from
from
what
can
be
very
loud
noise?
You
know
when
you,
when
jackhammering
happens
from
11
p.m.
till
6
a.m.
which
happened
all
last
summer,
people
will
call
my
office
actually
crying
they.
They
are
physically
disturbed
by
it.
G
H
You
much
mr.
mayor
and
on
this
noise
bylaw
mr.
mayor
I
do
have
concerns
as
one
of
the
busiest
areas
for
construction
that
is
happening
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
in
terms
of
Statesville
and
based
on
that
I
had
a
requested
from
staff
to
maybe
move
the
Saturday
morning
start
time
from
7
a.m.
to
8
a.m.
and
the
game.
People
were
wondering.
Well,
why
would
one
hour
make
such
a
difference?
It's
a
weekend
with
a
lot
of
young
families
that
have
you
know,
kids,
sleeping
or
in
on
the
weekends
so
based
on
that
mr.
H
I
You
thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
provide
just
a
few
remarks
of
context
for
this
item.
I.
Think,
as
colleagues
know,
this
item
originally
came
to
the
built
heritage
subcommittee,
with
a
recommendation
from
staff
that
the
application
for
demolition
be
refused.
That
was
upheld
that
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
and
then
went
to
Planning
Committee,
which
the
staff
recommendation
motion
lost
on
a
tie
and
not
led
to
the
replacement
motion
which
is
before
us
today.
I
Just
three
three
brief
comments
on
on
this
file,
because
I
know
that
many
colleagues
have
not
had
a
benefit
of
hearing
the
discussion.
That
happened
either
at
build
heritage
or
planning
and
I
mean
what's
what's
important.
To
note
is
that
the
Rockland
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District,
which
was
established
back
in
1997,
also
had
guidelines
which
were
created.
The
following
year,
which
essentially
set
out
rules
for
properties,
whether
its
additions
or
whether
its
facades
or
appearances
or
massing
or
scale
demolition,
etc.
There
was
a
fairly
comprehensive
set
of
guidelines
that
served
the
community.
I
Think
back
in
2014,
which
culminated
in
the
plan
being
finalized
and
back
to
Council.
Last
year.
It
was
passed
unanimously
by
us
here
at
Council
and
the
community
celebrated
that,
because
it
was
an
opportunity,
as
I
said,
to
both
strengthen
and
to
provide
teeth
to
those
original
guidelines
to
modernize
it
and
also
to
make
sure
that
there
was
greater
certainty
in
terms
of
how
to
manage
growth
in
the
village
moving
forward.
One
thing
that
is
important
to
note
is
that
the
draft
plan
was
subject
to
a
lot
of
public
discussions,
a
lot
of
public
consultation.
I
We
had
a
public
meeting
prior
to
the
plan
coming
to
council,
which
almost
100
residents
came
and,
interestingly,
and
importantly,
there
was
near
unanimous
support
for
the
plan
people
recognized
and
felt
that
it
was
important
that
the
unique
character
of
the
village
was
preserved,
and
for
that
reason
there
was
strong
public
support
for
it.
Importantly,
though,
the
plan
is
not
a
freezing
of
Rockland
Park,
it
is
a
management
plan.
I
It
sets
very
clear
rules
for
situations
of
again
of
additions
and
massing
and
scale,
but
it
also
ensures
that
in
many
cases,
if
people
want
to
demolish
their
properties,
there
is
a
process
for
that,
and
in
fact,
since
Council
passed
the
plan
a
year
ago,
staff
have
recommended
that
three
houses
be
demolished.
They
are
so-called
grade
two
houses,
so
they
have
a
score
of
a
hundred
of
less
than
50,
but
in
the
matter
at
hand,
we're
dealing
with
the
property
that
was
scored
originally
in
80
out
of
100
and
then
revised
to
a
69.
I
There
is
a
real
feeling
that,
in
order
for
the
plan
to
have
meaning,
it
needs
to
be
upheld
by
us
by
the
group
that
passed
it
last
year
and
it's
important
to
note
as
well
that,
because
the
plan
is
under
appeal,
heritage
staff
here
in
the
city
evaluated
the
property
both
under
the
original
1998
guidelines
and
under
the
2016
plan,
and
and
we
were
very
clear
in
their
recommendation-
that
the
application
failed
under
both
bodies.
So
that's
just
some
important
context.
I
A
J
J
We
dealt
with
the
fact
that
we
have
to
be
able
to
defend
what
we
do
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
and
based
on
the
information
that
was
provided
at
that
Planning
Committee.
There's
many
holes,
whether
it's
the
fact
there
was
claims
of
mr.
Selden
living
in
the
house
that
were
fictitious,
that
never
happened,
giving
a
different
scoring
than
what
was
originally
presented.
J
There
was
the
fact
there
was
claims
of
vegetation
on
the
property
in
trees.
Well,
if
you've
ever
walked
the
property,
there's
nothing
compounded
by
the
fact.
Yesterday,
our
planning
committee,
we
had
to
hold
an
item
that
was
related
to
issuance
of
a
building
permit,
but
it
was
noted
when
we
pulled
the
item
when
we
spoke
for
it
over
an
hour
that
there
was
no
demolition
permit.
So
I
asked
the
same
questions.
Would
they
have
had
to
go
through
the
same
matrix?
J
J
If
we
really
want
to
make
this
effective-
and
we
don't
want
this-
to
go
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
at
the
end
of
the
year
and
have
a
I
told
you
soul-
moment
where
it
loses
and
pokes
holes
like
Swiss
cheese
in
a
plan
that
is
meant
to
protect
the
community,
we
have
to
allow
this
to
take
place
today.
I
do
have
a
few
questions
actually
at
mr.
mark
great
one
of
my
questions
that
I
have
is
related
to.
K
J
On
that
I've
been
looking
at
what
our
level
of
success
is,
and
forgive
me
for
asking
many
of
the
same
questions
that
took
place
at
planning,
but
unfortunately
my
council
members
weren't
part
of
that
long
discussion.
What's
our
chances
of
success
based
on
what
you
see
in
front
of
you
today,
especially
with
the
fact
that
in
the
original
scoring
in
2010
versus
2017,
rather
than
changing
the
two
categories
where
it
was
identified
that
individual
didn't
live
and
there
was
no
vegetation,
they
changed
all
the
categories,
nor
was
Corey.
Willis
have
an
impact
at
the
OMB.
K
Mr.
mayor
I'm
understanding
the
council's
questions
to
focus
solely
on
the
matter
of
270
buckin,
and
if
the
council
also
wants
me
to
express
an
opinion
on
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
plan.
I,
of
course,
would
be
pleased
to
do
so
with
respect
to
the
application
for
demolition
and
new
construction.
I
have
had
the
opportunity
since
committee
to
reach
the
read
the
cultural
heritage,
district
study,
impact
study
and
I
was
struck
when
I
read
it
mr.
mayor
by
the
fact
that
the
study
is
really
focused
on
commending
the
new
building.
K
That
is
where
the
author
decided
to
direct
her
efforts.
I
do
not
find
there
to
be
much
on
the
question
of
the
demolition
of
the
existing
structure
and
I
have
to
say
mr.
mayor
that
that
struck
me
because
of
course,
the
first
step
to
redevelopment
of
the
site
would
have
to
be
the
demolition
of
the
existing
building.
So
I'm
loathe,
in
light
of
past
experience,
to
give
a
percentage
mr.
mayor,
but
what
I
will
say
is
I
think
the
city's
chances
are
slightly
better
than
5050
I.
K
J
Unfortunately,
I
wish
that
was
always
the
case
that
you
wanna
be,
but
we
know
we
we
don't
have
much
success.
I.
Think
based
on
what
happened
yesterday,
a
planning
committee
as
well
by
us
blocking
the
construction
after
they
tore
down
the
house
will
have
an
issue
there
as
well.
I
do
have
a
couple
more
questions.
I've
I've
had
some
comments
and
some
communications
about
other
great
we've,
never
seen
a
great
one
property
torn
down
before.
Can
you
comment
on
that?
Have
we
seen
grade
one
properties
torn
down.
L
Mr.
mayor,
the
the
grade
one
and
grade
two
categorizations
of
properties
was
completed
as
part
of
the
study
for
the
new
walk
off
Park
Heritage,
Conservation
District
plan,
and
since
as
since
the
since
the
the
evaluations
were
completed
and
the
plan
was
adopted,
this
is
the
only
application
that
we
have
received
for
the
demolition
of
a
grade,
one
building
that
was
scored
according
to
the
to
the
new
scoring
system
that
was
adopted
as
part
of
the
renewal
of
the
heritage
plan.
So.
J
L
L
In
addition,
at
the
time
there
was
another
test
that
the
city
used
is
whether
it
was
included
on
the
former
heritage
inventory
of
walk
LOF
Park
in
that
building
was
not
in
the
case
of
270
buqun.
The
building
was
both
on
the
former
inventory
of
heritage
resources
and
received
a
score
of
69,
whereas
the
score
of
285
acacia
was
56.
J
B
J
I
have
a
few
more
questions
related
to
yesterday,
we
are
presented
with
some
information
by
Court.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
believe
councilor
hubli
asked
for
that
information.
Quite
a
while
ago.
We
only
had
it
in
front
of
us
last
night,
I
actually
got
confused
when
I
was
going
through
some
of
it
as
well,
because
originally
we
had
the
2010
for
the
same
property
with
the
score
and
when
it
was
highlighted
that
mr.
Selden
never
lived
there,
there's
no
vegetation
the
property
rather
than
just
changing
the
two
categories.
J
It
appears
the
whole
scoring
system
was
completely
changed.
Then
there
was
a
attached
2016
version
which
doesn't
correlate
at
all
with
theirs.
It's
not
the
same
number,
it's
it
shows
80
and
the
other
one
shows
80
point
six
five
and
then
in
the
2017
edition
I'll
call
it.
It
now
shows
a
number
of
69.
All
these
changes
and
three
versions
of
documents
is
there.
No
standard
template
that's
to
be
used
across
the
board,
because
I,
even
yesterday,
I
was
looking
at
the
scoring
the
numbers
that
it
was
out
of
didn't
match
and
I.
M
Mayor
I
can
advise
that
this
is
the
same
square
methodology
we've
used
in
all
of
our
huge
conservation
district
plans.
By
word,
the
five
Sandy
Hill,
the
former
City
of
Ottawa,
used
this
scoring
methodology
as
well.
As
the
vice-chair
I
pointed
out,
the
applicant
did
bring
new
information
to
us
once
they
file
their
application
with
respect
to
the
sevens
time
that
they
lived
in
the
property
and
with
changes
that
have
been
made
to
the
property,
since
we've
done
our
initial
scoring
back
in
2016.
J
And
when
I
look
at
a
situation
like
back
when
it
was
the
Acadia
house,
for
example,
there
is
so
many
points
set
aside,
because
the
rock
left
may
have
lived
in
that
house.
We
clearly
identified
nobody
lived
in
this
house
that
was
caught
on
court
of
importance,
but
yet
they
still
had
ten
in
that
category
I'm,
having
a
hard
time
with
with
how
that
with
rationale
is
and
that's
what
this
is
about,
is
about
rationale
and
defending
rationale.
You
just
comment
on
that.
L
Mr.
mayor,
when,
when
the
the
fact
was
revealed
that
mr.
southern
had
not
lived
there
for
as
long
as
we
had
thought
and
and
that
was
we
were
willing
to
collect
the
record
as
soon
as
we
received
that
information,
we
dropped
it
down
from
a
to
a
fair
and
the
fair
score
was
given
to
in
similar
houses,
and
we
were
evaluated
over
800
houses
in
wroclaw
Park
and
if
the
house
had
been
inhabited
by
who
was
active
in
the
community
and
only
for
a
long
time
by
the
same
person.
L
In
this
case,
45
years
is
a
well-known
person
in
the
community
and
a
member
of
a
well-known,
lumbering
family.
So
all
the
other
houses
that
were
similar
that
is
lived
in
by
the
same
person
for
a
long
time
and
associated
with
some
aspect
of
Ottawa's
history.
They
were
all
given
a
fair.
So
this
received
a
fair,
and
that
is
consistent
with
the
scoring
that
was
undertaken
and
arrived
at
through
consensus
with
city
staff
and
members
of
the
rock
lift
community.
And
so
that's
why?
J
A
J
Yeah,
thank
you
for
the
30
seconds.
I
do
appreciate
that,
first
of
all,
I'm
hoping
somebody
else
asks
a
couple
of
quick
questions
in
regards
to
the
lumbering
family.
I
looked
at
the
report
that
was
circulated
last
night.
There
was
no
mention
of
this
news
to
me
about
the
detail
behind
it,
where
other
reports
have
it.
That
being
said,
I
want
to
really
illustrate
the
fact
I'm
not
against
heritage.
This
is
not
a
heritage
situation.
Rothwell
I
put
a
heritage
designation
on
three
streets.
J
In
my
ward
last
time,
I
supported
my
friend
Jeff
leaper
on
Broadview
public
school,
being
a
heritage
designation,
that's
not
what
this
is
about.
This
is
the
rationale
and
what
is
going
to
hold
up
in
front
of
our
true
test,
which
is
u1b
which
exists
today
but
night,
not
tomorrow,
and
we
have
to
be
stronger
and
what
we
do.
Thank
you
thank.
G
You
mr.
mayor,
so
I
won't
be
supporting
the
replacement
motion.
I
will
be
supporting
the
staff
recommendation,
of
course,
so
just
I
just
to
clarify
this.
This
is
this
grade
one
property.
This
there
has
not
been
a
demolition
since
this
plan
was
adopted
months
ago
for
another
grade.
One
property.
If
in
this
plan
is
that
correct.
G
L
Mr.
mayor,
there
are
in
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
312
grade
one
buildings
and
406
or
something
great
grade
two
buildings.
So
there
that
is
312
buildings
that
the
guidelines
indicate.
We
would
not
what
that
demolition
would
not
be
recommended.
I
can't
speculate
on
how
many
applications
we
won't
receive
fair.
G
L
B
You
mr.
maryk,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
was
asked
I
Madden
on
the
committee,
so
I
know
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this
and
I
had
difficulty
in
understanding
the
all
of
the
heritage
things
together
learns
to
me,
but
turning
to
more
statisticians
than
actually
real
heritage,
things
and
I
find
that
typical
this
city
with
a
lot
of
the
planning
things
we
we
do
it
by
figures
and
numbers,
and
things
like
that
not
looking
at
what
you're
going
to
end
up
with
is
the
whole
purpose
of
this.
L
Mr.
mayor,
the
objective
of
any
Heritage
Conservation
District
is
to
preserve
the
cultural
heritage
value
of
the
of
the
designated
place
and
to
manage
change
within
the
Heritage
Conservation
District.
So
what
what
we
do
is
balance
some
balance,
changes
to
buildings
and
landscapes
against
the
to
make
it
against
the
character
of
the
district
and
to
make
sure
that
all
change
reflects
the
defined
heritage,
character
and
attributes
as
as
laid
out
in
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
plan.
Okay,.
B
L
L
Mr.
mayor,
the
the
applicant
presented
that
the
drawings
and
then
in
the
last
a
little
while
has
made
some
changes
to
them
at
the
request
of
heritage
staff.
So
there
are
may
fifth
drawings
of
the
of
the
building
that,
if,
if
that
that
staff
has
no
objection
to
okay.
M
To
be
clear,
the
staff
recommendation
count
mayor
is
to
recommend
against
demolition
of
the
property.
We
were
directed
a
planning
committee
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
revised
elevations
that
would
meet
the
spirit
of
the
guidelines:
the
Rockland
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District.
So
it's
a
separate
stream.
If
you
will
and
that's
exactly
what
we've
done,
we've
worked
with
them
over
the
last
two
weeks
on
arriving
at
a
set
of
elevations
that
are
acceptable
to
staff.
Should
demolition
proceed
so.
B
B
Part
of
it,
I
think
you
know,
think
about
a
house
is
that
people
live
in
them
and
it's
their
living
area
and
the
interior
of
any
living
area
is
very
important
for
how
a
family
lives.
This
particular
family
has
found
that
the
way
that
that
house
is
sort
of
broken
up
inside
etc,
it's
not
very
compatible
to
their
family
structure.
So
what
you're
saying
is
we're
going
to
actually
control
how
people
can
live
because
they'd,
rather
than
letting
it
put
something
that
fits
our
our
guidelines
in
the
end?
B
N
Mr.
man,
if
I
may
respond
to
that
question,
this
goes
back
to
miss
Coutts
reply
on
the
purpose
of
heritage
conservation
districts
in
the
first
place
that
the
intent
of
heritage
conservation
districts
is
to
identify
areas
within
the
city
where
they
have
significant
cultural
heritage
attributes,
either
through
a
combination
of
individual
buildings
or
by
combination
as
a
buildings
and
cultural
landscape
character.
The
intent
of
heritage
conservation
districts
is
to
maintain
into
the
future
those
aspects
of
worthy
of
heritage
value
to
continue
into
the
future.
N
We
don't
take
positions
one
way
or
the
other
on
the
internal
configurations
of
houses
in
the
lot
like.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
our
guidelines
and
policies
do
allow
for
modifications
of
buildings
and
had
an
application
and
filed
for
a
modification
of
the
building
that
would
have
been
given
due
process
in
consideration
ultimately
brought
forward
to
Council.
So
I
think
I
want
to
reiterate
mr.
Cootes
position
about
the
intent
of
the
carriage
conservation
districts
and
what
their
intended
the
outcome
they're
supposed
to
have
and
to
address
your
question.
B
N
Mayor
staffs
position
is
that
we
don't
support
the
removal
of
the
building.
It
has
heritage
value.
We
don't
so
we
don't
support
it.
However,
based
on
committee's
direction,
we
reviewed
independently
the
new
proposal
and
feel
that
the
new
proposal
would
meet
the
intent
of
the
guideline
of
the
guidelines.
If
Council
chooses
to
approve
it.
G
B
A
show
that
I've
had
with
us
all
the
way
along
is
that
it
really
I
thought
that
the
new
building
was
actually
but
the
landscaping
they
wanted
to
put
on
it,
and
everything
else
was
better.
I
was
really
surprised
at
how
high
they
ranked
around
sleeping
on
this
building
because
they
erected
a
lot
higher
than
another
building
in
wroclaw
Park
that
has
far
improved
ones:
landscape
/,
this
one.
So
it's
a
very
subjective
rating.
As
you
know,
it's.
B
We
keep
talking
about
in
in
heritage
buildings
that
reusing
them
to
make
them
so
that
they
you
meet,
Mount
modern
needs
and
as
they
put
frontages
on
them,
so
they
meet
modern
this
to
the
style
of
this
buildings,
almost
the
same
as
the
other
one.
It's
just
got
a
different
way
of
arranging
the
rooms
and
windows
and
things.
So
it's
it's
almost
like
a
every
use
that
makes
good
use
of
the
building
I'm
a
great
supporter
of
them.
B
I
had
the
first
built
their
heritage,
building
ever
in
Canada,
I've
pushed
forward
to
get
done
and
I've
done
a
number
of
other
buildings
and
I've
helped
people
to
do
modifications
to
them
that
fit
in
this
one.
To
my
mind,
this
doesn't
fit
into
that
category.
It
is
a
family
home.
It's
going
to
be
replaced
by
a
family
home
that
meets
the
guidelines
and
I
really
have
a
real
problem
in
in
shattering
people's
ability
to
use
their
properties.
B
Because
of
that-
and
we
now
know
yesterday,
they
could
dealt
with
one
that
person
illegally
took
the
building
down,
and
then
you
very
calmly
said:
yes,
you
can
have
a
building
permit.
So
the
whole
thing
is
that
sometimes
you
do
a
sense
of
me
with
a
bomb
to
blow
the
place
up
and
then
they
get
a
building
permit
or
they
leave
it
empty
and
the
vagabonds
do
it
for
them.
It's
it's
a
really
one
of
these
section.
We've
had
an
empty
heritage
programs
before
that
causes,
lots
and
lots
of
problems.
B
It's
much
better
if
they're
occupied
and
they're
being
used
in
some
way,
and
they
have
a
tenant
in
there
now,
but
they
don't
have
to
keep
that
there
I
just
think
this
is
one
where
we
should
say
it's.
This
one
will
work.
I
wouldn't
do
this
for
every
property,
but
this
particular
one
seems
I.
Just
don't
see
how
we
could
take
any
other
objective
view
of
it
and
and
federer
people's
use
of
their
own
properties.
There
are
still
a
few
property
rights
country,
I
thought.
A
O
You
mr.
Mehra
I'm
really
happy
to
hear
that
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
if
we
approve
demolition
today
that
they
will
be
working
with
the
applicant
to
make
sure
that
the
the
new
property
does
fit
the
the
goals
of
the
heritage
plan,
along
with
council
attorney
and
counselor
Wilkinson's
comments.
I
I
had
a
lot
of
difficulty
with
this
act
committee
on
the
scoring
side
of
it.
I
read
the
scoring
sheets.
O
I
saw
how
important
it
was
that
this
Robert,
so
firm
had
lived
in
the
house
and
that
you
know
the
the
mature
trees
on
the
property
added
to
the
environment
of
the
neighborhood
and
I
understood
what
where
they
were
going
until
I
found
out
that
this
guy
never
lived
there.
And
so
the
30
points
that
went
down
in
the
report
for
somebody
important
living
there
didn't
have
another
name
to
replace
it:
the
trees
that
they
were
adding
value
to
the
environment
and
giving
not
just
30
points,
but
it's
a
a
weighted
score
and
mr.
O
mayor
so
I
think
it's
something
like
forty.
Five
percent
of
the
weight
of
the
score
goes
to
the
environment,
but
these
trees
weren't
even
on
their
property.
These
trees
are
on
the
next
property
over,
so
they're
not
being
touched
by
this
plan
at
all.
So,
if
that's
where
the
scores
were
arrived
on,
then
I
think
to
be
fair
to
any
applicant.
We
should
be
revising
those
scores
and
either
coming
up
with
something
else
that
generates
the
the
score
remaining
or
recognize
that
this
is
not
a
grade.
One
property.
O
O
Turday,
if
we
had
agreed
to
this,
where
someone
that's
following
all
the
rules
and
trying
to
respect
the
plan,
the
these
very
important
plan
that
the
community
wants
to
keep
in
place,
someone
that's
trying
to
follow
all
those
rules,
we're
gonna,
punish
them
and
say
no
go,
spend
a
whole
bunch
more
money
to
go,
do
and
be
show
them
how
we
messed
up
the
scoring
here
and
how
we're
now
revising
to
try
to
match
up
to
our
numbers
and
and
good
luck.
Sometimes
the
things
we
give
mr.
O
mark
to
defend
for
us
at
the
OMB
I.
Don't
think
we
pay
him
enough
to
defend
us
for
doing
things
like
this
I'm
disappointed
in
it
I
think
we're
sending
the
wrong
message
by
trying
to
say
no.
No,
we
have
to
sort
of
blanketly
refused
this
because
it
doesn't
match
up
to
the
plan.
I
think
it's
very,
very
important
to
be
honest
in
our
scoring
and
be
able
to
justify
those
scores
for
people.
So
mr.
O
mayor
I
find
in
this
case
here
and
especially
with
the
news
today,
that
staff
have
come
to
a
good
compromise
with
the
applicant
I'm
excited
to
hear
that
so
I'll
be
supporting
the
the
partial
demo
of
this
building
so
that
they
can
get
on
with
building
what
looks
like
a
good
house.
I
want
to
have
one
more
point
to
it.
That
goes
to
the
information
provided.
O
Many
of
you
may
have
saw
as
some
of
the
reports
in
the
media
I
think
it
was
Metroland
editorial
that
talked
about
this
being
a
monster
house
inserted
into
the
neighborhood,
where,
in
fact,
what
we
learned
a
planning
is,
the
new
house
is
of
the
same
size
as
the
neighbors
around
it,
and
just
last
year
the
house
one
one
or
two
Lots
over
it
was
demoed
and
rebuilt.
So
it's
not
like
this.
O
Is
the
first
house
that's
going
to
be
modern
and
reinstate
it
so
that
it
will
be
there
for
many
years
to
come,
but
it
is
a
house
that
someone
has
taken
an
interest
in
and
wants
to
make
an
investment
in
and
I
think
we
should
be
supporting
that
and
and
rewarding
the
fact
that
they
just
didn't
demo
it
and
come
in
and
ask
for
a
rebuild
permit.
So
thank
you.
Mr.
mayor.
P
Councillor
Wilkinson
and
councillor
hubli
have
have
said
that
staff
now
have
have
reached
a
compromise
with
their
proponent
can
can
I
haven't
seen
documents
on
that
miss
Coutts
or
Mr
curry?
Can
you
comment
on
that?
Did
the
staff
still
the
original
report
to
Planning
Committee
on
recommended
refusal
and
I
recognize
that
Planning
Committee
had
two
votes
on
the
issue?
You
update
me
on
staffs
position
so.
M
It
reflects
the
conversations
that
we've
had
with
the
applicant
since
Planning
Committee
on
April
25th,
for
the
motion
moved
by
the
vice-chair
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
determining
whether
we
can
arrive
at
a
set
of
elevations
that
respect
the
rock
cliff
park,
Heritage
Conservation
District
guidelines.
So
there
were
five
areas
that
we
worked
with
the
applicant
on
and
in
all
cases
the
applicant
was
amenable
to
making
changes
such
that
that
application
would
comply
with
with
the
guidelines.
M
P
L
Mr.
mayor,
no,
the
the
the
the
issues
that
were
brought
to
our
attention,
that,
regarding
the
original
inhabitant
and
and
the
landscape,
that
was
changed
between
the
time
the
building
was
originally
evaluated
and
and
and
today
we
don't
anticipate
any
anything
further.
But
again
we
were
willing
to
do
the
analysis
and
change
the
score,
because
there
were
reasonable,
reasonable
requests
raised
regarding
the
original
application
and
the
landscape,
and
we
thought
that
it
was
appropriate
to
respond
to
these
particular
requests
and
look
at
the
evaluation
of
the
building.
The.
P
L
P
Q
Shermer
a
question
to
mr.
Willis
I'm:
sorry,
mr.
Reyes
I
wasn't
at
committee
yesterday.
I
did
hear
about
and
did
read
the
report
just
to
clarify
that
the
property
that
was
illegally
demolished,
not
the
one
that's
in
front
of
us
today.
What
grade
was
that
property
that
wasn't
a
great
one
property
as
I?
Could
it
was
a
grade
two
property
and
we
are.
There
are
legal
proceedings
for
that
property.
N
Mr.
mee
I'm
not
going
to
comment
at
length
that
matters
that
will
be
before
legal
proceedings,
but
I
would
just
to
clarify.
There
are
two
distinct
issues
in
the
other
file.
One
is
the
matter
of
the
demolition
and
the
other
is
that
the
application
that
we
are
required
to
process
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
for
replacement
building,
so
those
are
two
distinct
items
and
just
for
clarifying
the
facts
in
the
case.
Thank.
R
So
I
want
to
thank
all
involved
for
this,
though
I
still
have
a
couple,
a
couple
of
questions,
so
the
10%
that
that's
awarded
if
I,
understand
the
explanation
its
award,
because
the
house
was
simply
inhabited
for
60
years,
doesn't
really
matter
that
much
who
inhabited
it.
But
somebody
lived
in
the
house
for
60
years
on
a
continuous
basis.
N
Mr.
mayor
may
I
answer
this
first,
miss
Coutts
can
collect
correct
me
if
I
am
wrong.
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
understood
that
the
reference
to
mr.
saw
them
did
get
addressed
through
the
correction
in
the
scoring.
But
there
was
another
person
who
inhabited
that
house
of
local
significance,
which
is
a
Barnet
McClaren
who
is,
and
the
McClaren
family
lived
in
that
house
for
many
many
years
and
the
McClaren
family
is
strongly
associated
with
the
history
of
the
Rockland
Park
community.
N
R
N
O
K
R
L
Mr.
mayor
yesterday,
I
anticipating
this
question,
we
have
all
that
information
in
place
and
I.
Some
student
count
how
many
buildings
that
mr.
Heiser
goal
was
involved
with
the
design
of
he
had
a
number
of
firms
with
different
names.
So
out
of
the
316
buildings
that
are
category
one
buildings
he
designed
or
was
involved
in
the
design
of
31.
So.
R
R
The
the
other
question
is
and
I
want
to
I
want
to
thank
the
court
for
explaining
this
to
me
yesterday,
because
it
is
a
bit
nuanced.
The
proposed
new
building,
if
it
was
anywhere
else
but
rock
cliff,
would
meet
the
existing
zoning
and
the
people
would
be
allowed
to
build
as
of
right
and
I
proposed
I
mean
the
original
design,
not
the
one
that
you
now
have,
but
the
original
design
would
have
been
working
at
our
zoning
laws
and
requirements
that
would
have
been
allowed
to
be
built.
M
R
M
R
R
M
K
Mr.
mayor
I'll
start
off
and
then
mr.
career
miss
Coutts
may
wish
to
step
in
there.
Of
course,
many
other
areas
of
the
city,
whether
our
Heritage
Conservation
districts
in
place
and
some
have
district
plans.
Some
just
have
guidelines,
but
a
heritage
analysis
would
have
to
take
place.
Mr.
Mann,
okay,.
R
So
you
meet
the
rules
you
can
build,
but
we
don't
want
you
to
build,
and
yet
yesterday
and
again
I
wasn't
there.
We
have.
We
have
an
applicant
that
ignored
the
rules
and
is
being
rewarded,
and
this
question
is
to
two
team.
Mr.
mark
is
there
any
way
the
city
could
stop
the
individual
from
yesterday,
the
African
from
yesterday
from
building
whatever
they
want
to
build.
K
K
R
R
K
R
A
N
A
demolition
permit,
mr.
Mehra,
if
I
may,
at
this
stage
of
the
game,
with
the
investigations
continuing
and
the
facts
being
assembled,
I
won't
actually
use
a
specific
term.
It
is
a
matter
under
investigation
by
the
chief
building
official,
as
well
as
our
city,
legal,
with
respect
to
both
the
Ontario
Building
Code
Act
and
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
Okay,.
S
A
quite
surprised,
actually
get
councillor,
Engel
and
I
usually
see
eye
to
eye
on
many
things
and
follow
similar
logic,
but
it's
in
fact
the
logic
that
I
have
to
call
into
question
here
that,
because
the
replacement
might
be
acceptable,
we
would
therefore
be
in
favor
of
eliminating
what
currently
exists,
by
that
same
logic,
that
beautiful
mature
tree
on
the
yard
in
our
neighborhood
that
everyone
wants
protected,
but
because
staff
are
ok
with
a
maple
being
planted
to
replace
it.
If
somebody
illegally
cut
it
down.
S
Therefore,
it's
okay
to
cut
it
down.
That's
the
exact
same
logic
that
I'm
finding
here
and
although
our
staff
were
instructed
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
find
ways
to
make
their
proposal
more
compatible
with
the
Heritage
District
guidelines.
That's
not
the
same
thing
as
saying
or
employing
that
our
staff
are
now
in
favor
of
it.
In
fact,
they
have
said
on
several
occasions
that
they
are
not,
and
I
cannot
follow
the
logic
that,
because
it
would
be
a
beautiful
house
that
would
replace
it,
they
would
otherwise
meet
the
guidelines.
S
A
Well,
let
me
offer
a
couple
of
comments
on
this.
This
is
an
issue.
That's
received
a
great
deal
of
lobbying
and
attention
and
focus
by
both
both
sides
of
the
issue,
but
I'm,
asking
members
of
council
to
support
our
heritage
district
plan
and
vote
against
demolishing
this
building.
Now,
just
to
put
it
in
perspective,
even
before
the
cities
were
amalgamated,
a
rock
cliff
was
actually
ahead
of
it
of
its
time
in
going
forward,
I
think
they
probably
figured
out.
A
Amalgamation
was
coming
down
the
pipe
and
in
fact
it
did
in
their
term
of
Council
in
97
to
2000,
and
they
went
ahead
and
designated
the
rock
cliff
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District
when
amalgamation
took
place.
Many
years
later,
the
city
and
this
council
and
I
remind
everyone.
We
all
voted
for
the
rock
cliff
park,
Heritage
Conservation
District,
and
we
all
knew
what
we
were
voting
for.
It
was
to
protect
and
preserve
the
character
of
that
particular
community
and
in
preparation
of
the
plan.
A
Every
building
in
the
district
was
researched
and
analyzed
evaluated
with
a
score
based
on
environmental,
historical
and
architectural
significance.
And
yes,
there
were
changes
to
the
score
because
new
information
came
forward
since
the
original
scoring
I
think
that
would
be
only
sensible
for
our
staff
to
come
forward
if
they
discovered
that
that
tree
or
that
shrub
was
not
on
the
property
to
make
an
alteration,
but
even
with
an
alteration
that
still
remained
the
highest
grade
grade.
A
So
I
think
what
we
have
before
us
is
a
key
opportunity
for
us
to
support
what
we
all
support
it
unanimously
in
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
vote
in
2016,
and
it
would
seem
rather
strange
literally
in
the
incas
and
ride
on
the
document
and
we're
already
the
first
application
through
the
door
we're
ready
to
throw
out
the
entire
Heritage
District
Conservation
Area
and,
as
someone
pointed
out,
a
member
who
asked
the
question.
This
does
set
a
precedent
all
of
a
sudden.
If
someone
sees
this
happening,
why
not
open
the
floodgates?
A
And
you
know
I've
got
a
a
grade.
One
building
I'm
going
to
ask
for
demolition
because
I
want
to
put
a
different
building
up.
Well,
it
defeats
the
whole
purpose
of
the
heritage
conservation
concept
that
we
want
these
areas
to
remain
as
part
of
our
built
heritage,
and
we
all
have
areas
in
our
community
I.
Think
I
was
telling
councillor
Qadri.
You
know
in
Statesville
Main
Street,
which
has
that
beautiful
old
buildings
on
it.
You
want
to
maintain
and
preserve
that
characteristic.
A
You
don't
want
to
have
you
know
what
you've
got
a
gigantic
Walmart
on
the
part
of
the
area
that
you
have
preserved
and
I
think
we
all
have
areas,
maybe
not
as
old,
obviously
as
rock
cliff
and
some
of
the
newer
suburbs.
Obviously
you
don't
have
homes
that
are
50
or
75
or
100
years
old,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
actually
support
what
we
support
it
and
we
not
simply
go
down
the
path
simply
because
some
person
wants
to
demolish
a
home.
You
know
the
reality.
A
P
P
A
A
I
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
yes,
I,
have
a
motion
before
me.
Be
it
resolved
that
council
refused
the
application
to
demolish
270
buckin
Road,
a
property
located
in
the
rock
the
park,
Heritage
Conservation,
District
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
refused
the
application
to
construct
a
new
building
on
the
property
located
at
270,
Park
and
Road,
etc.
I
A
A
T
You
chair,
one
of
the
provisions
in
the
guidelines
was
that
if
money
is
allocated
through
a
section
37
agreement
to
one
affordable,
housing
project
or
or
use,
and
it
was
proposed
to
be
moved
to
another,
affordable
housing
use
that
that
could
be
accomplished
with
staff
delegate
staffs
delegated
authority.
This
motion
would
introduce
councillor
concurrence
into
that
formula,
such
that
the
councillor
concurrence
would
be
required
in
order
to
switch
between
affordable
housing
envelopes
within
section
37.
T
My
understanding
is
that
this
enjoy
staff
support,
whereas
report
ACS
etc,
which
recommends
council
approved
the
section
37
guidelines
2017
was
approved
by
Planning
Committee
on
May
9th
and
whereas
planning
committee
requested
that
additional
wording
to
guidelines
7/7,
affordable
housing
of
the
section
37
guidelines
2017,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
guidelines.
77,
affordable
housing
of
document
1,
be
amended
by
deleting
and
replacing
the
last
sentence
with
the
use
of
any
cash
payments
towards
affordable
housing
will
be
determined
under
the
discretion
of
the
general
manager
of
community
and
social
services.
A
T
I'm
not
entirely
sure,
because
to
date,
I,
don't
haven't
seen
section
37
funds
used
toward
och
generally.
What
we've
seen
in
the
the
wards
where
there
has
been
money
allocated
through
section
37,
is
that
it's
being
held
in
a
fund.
That
would
be
the
reason
for
this
motion
is
to
ensure
that
the
councillor
has
some
control
over
that,
so
that
it
is
Ward
specific.
H
R
D
R
N
Willis
I'm
mr.
Mehra,
on
behalf
of
myself
and
general
manager,
Janice
Burrell,
who
is
not
here
to
help,
but
her
staffer
are
here
to
assist
me
on
this.
Generally
speaking,
auto
community
housing
isn't
the
only
potential
provider
of
housing
depending
on
the
geography
of
where
the
actual
application
is
and
where
the
funds
are
available.
So
ok,
the
councillor
egg
lies
point
is
well-taken
that
that
they
are
our
community.
N
Housing
is
a
good
group
to
consult
and
we
would
do
that
on
a
staff
level,
but
in
not
all
circumstances
what
Ottawa
Community
Housing
be
necessarily
a
participant
in
the
discussion,
depending
on
which
word
we're
talking
about.
So
my
advice
is
that
we
take
that
back
under
staff
direction
rather
than
through
the
motion.
R
Q
Q
N
Mr.
Merrit
we're
getting
our
experience
with
section
37
in
the
city
and
were
relatively
few
years
into
it
in
comparison
to
other
municipalities.
I
think
the
we
take
that
back
as
a
commitment
of
an
issue
to
continue
to
monitor
and
try
to
provide
operational
procedures
and
practices
that
offer
greater
clarity.
And
then,
when
we
bring
forward
reports
to
committees
and
Council,
will
will
explain
those
factors
with
more
additional
detail.
And
if
mr.
Schmitt
has
any
additional
comments
doubt
on
behalf
on
top
of
that
of
11.
N
K
Mayor
I
think
the
key
with
section
37,
it's
a
negotiation
process
and
there's
been
experiencing
other
jurisdictions,
primarily
in
Toronto,
where,
if
you
start
articulating
and
defining
precisely
and
preclude
the
whole
notion
of
negotiation,
the
whole
perception
37
process
tends
to
be
looked
at
as
another
form
of
Taxation,
which
is
not
allowed
under
the
section
37
provisions
of
the
Planning
Act.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
it's
structured
in
a
way
where,
in
fact
we
do
provide
for
the
draw
down,
in
fact,
is
a
lot
of
negotiation.
K
We
clarify
the
types
of
things
that
would
be
eligible
considerations
for
determining
or
draw
down.
We
don't
indicate
that
there's
a
percentage
amount
that
would
be
associated
with
compiling
of
these
draw
downs,
but
there
are
general
parameters,
I
think,
to
to
mr.
Ellis
this
point.
We
understand
that
there's
some
concern
about
how
we
come
up
with
these
determinations
and
it's
something
that
clearly
we'll
have
to
continue
to
work
through
and
work.
But
the
important
thing
that
we
can't
lose
sight
of
is
the
is
the
concept
of
negotiation
make.
Q
N
Marriage
lockdown
yeah
mr.
Merritt.
What
I
think
is
reasonable
is
when
we
do
our
staff
reports
in
section
37,
we
can
indicate
in
the
staff
reports
factors
that
affect
the
drawdown
and,
if
should
counselors,
have
additional
information
or
request,
so
we
can
deal
with
them
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
It's
not
advisable
to
include
the
numbers
because,
as
mr.
N
T
Please
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
just
for
the
benefit
of
colleagues.
This
was
a
significant
line
of
questioning
along
what
counselor
flurry
was
asking
was
some
greater
transparency
around
the
value
of
those
drawdowns.
I
did
have
a
very
good
conversation
with
miss,
and
mr.
James
and
I
am
satisfied
with
their
commitment
to
try
to
provide
significant
new
transparency
and
staff
reports
moving
forward
with
respect
to
how
those
drawdowns
have
influenced
the
the
very
first
number.
T
So
we'll
look
forward
to
seeing
those
as
as
we
move
forward
thanks
and
thank
you
to
your
staff
for
having
that
conversation,
because
I
am
also
convinced
now
by
the
need
not
to
get
too
deep
into
the
numbers,
because
we
don't
want
to
give
bargaining
leverage
away
to
the
developers
who
want
that
final
number
to
look
as
high
as
we
can
possibly
get
it.
So
thank
you
to
your
staff.
A
A
H
You
very
much,
sir
mr.
mayor
that
the
reports
from
the
Ottawa
Community
Land
Development
Corporation
entitled
Ottawa
community
lands,
Development
Corporation,
2016
annual
report,
the
report
from
city
clerk
and
solicitor's
office
entitled
status,
update
council
inquiries
in
motions
for
the
period
ending
May,
19,
2017
community
and
Protective
Services
community
report,
23
planning
committee
report,
1443
b
and
44
a
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
and
solicitor's
office
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
bill.
A
We
do
I
hate
doing
that
Eli,
because
you've
worked
so
hard
as
your
other
colleagues
have.
But
we
know
we
appreciate
you
referencing
the
conflict,
so
this
is
on
the
tax
deferral
program
that
I
referenced
at
our
last
meeting
that
the
rules
of
procedure
be
approved,
carried
on
the
report,
councillor
bleh
sand
by
councillor
Taylor,
councillor
bleh.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
the
motion,
please.
D
A
S
Admit
this
is
a
little
unusual
one.
Apparently
it
is
becoming
popular
at
some
soccer
games
to
have
smoke
generating
devices
among
certain
fan
groups
for
atmosphere
in
stands.
Oh
sake
has
been
receiving
requests
from
their
core
fan
groups
and
their
sense
is
better
to
create
a
controlled
way
of
putting
smoke
into
the
stadium
than
ad-hoc
of
generation
of
smoke
by
by
some
supporters.
That
was
currently
not
allowed
under
our
bylaws,
but
my
understanding
is
in
conversation
with
staff.
S
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
grant
an
exemption
to
bylaw
2003
to
37,
to
Ottawa
sports,
an
Entertainment
Group
to
allow
for
the
use
of
smoke
devices
for
Fury
games,
starting
May
24th
for
five
games
during
the
2017
season
and
granting
oh
Sagan
exemption
from
section
17
of
the
bylaw,
which
requires
a
permit
application
to
be
made
30
days
in
advance
to
the
proposed
use,
subject
to
Oh
cig
meeting.
All
other
permit
requirements
of
the
bylaw,
including
section
18,
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
fire
chief.
A
C
Certainly
hear
the
noise
from
Lansdowne,
but
that's
another
issue
for
another
day,
I'm
I'm
just
concerned
about
what
the
actual
smoke
is.
I,
don't
know
if
the
word
smoke
is
being
used
to
describe
it's
not
actual
smoke,
but
can
I
just
get
a
comment
on
what
the
actual
gas
is
and
what
the
potential,
if
any
impacts
are
on
on
the
health
of
people
who
will
be
sitting
near
these
devices.
C
A
E
The
fire
chief
in
the
fire
service
did
look
at
the
public
safety
aspect
of
it.
Then
the
MSDS
sheet
said
there
was
no
health
risk.
That
said,
we
could
follow
up
with
with
Public
Health,
because
I
don't
have
the
direct
answer
as
to
what
the
product
is,
but
it's
the
one
similar
you'll
see
it
concerts
and
rock
concerts
and
other
types
of
events
as
that
type
of
smoke.
I've.
C
Seen
all
types
of
from
flares
and
European
stands
to
actual
smoke
smoke
machines,
all
other
types
of
substances,
so
I'd
like
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
what's
actually
being
released
and
whether
it's
in
the
stands
where
people
are
sitting
or
whether
it's
going
to
be
on
the
periphery
of
the
stadium.
That
information
is
not
here
and
I.
C
E
H
A
You
were
gonna
say
that
on
the
motion
is
presented.
Carried
next
item
requires
suspension
of
the
rules,
is
a
motion
by
myself,
signed
by
councillor
and
I,
with
respect
to
Road
and
pathway,
repairs
on
the
wave
of
the
rules
carried
as
many
members
of
council
know
this.
This
issue
of
the
quality
of
roads
after
one
of
the
worst
winters
we
had
with
the
freeze/thaw
cycles
and
the
number
of
potholes
that
have
been
filled
and
some
of
them
had
to
be
filled
on
a
temporary
basis
with
cold
patch.
A
I,
certainly
hear
from
a
lot
of
residents
on
a
pretty
regular
basis
when
I'm
out
and
about
in
the
community
that
we
need
to
invest
more
in
our
road
and
pathway
system.
Particularly
I,
often
see
the
condition
of
roads
along
the
shoulders
in
very
rough
shape,
and
that's
bad
for
motorists.
It's
bad
for
cyclists.
At
the
same
time,
so
working
with
staff
I
was
able
to
secure
2.5
million
dollars
in
funds
being
returned
as
part
of
capital.
Closed
exercise,
as
well
as
funds
in
the
one-time.
A
An
unforeseen
including
400,000,
be
added
to
the
unscheduled
asphalt
road
pathway,
surface
repairs
program,
which
is
in
essence,
fixing
the
potholes
and
I
would
ask
members
of
council
for
their
support.
Obviously
we're
not
unique
in
this
situation.
You
go
to
other
cities
and
have
the
same
temperature
and
climate.
We
had
something
like
77,
0,
freeze,
thaw
cycles
and,
as
we
all
know,
from
the
work
that
our
good
folks
at
Public
Works
do
trying
to
keep
up
with
these
freeze
thaw
cycles
the
water
freezes,
then
it
thaws
and
the
the
pothole
is
created.
A
So
I
certainly
appreciate
the
challenge.
Mr.
Wiley
and
his
team
have
faced,
they
have
filled
and
I
believe
mr.
Riley
over
200,000
different
potholes,
but
we
also
know
that
we
have
a
significantly
long
list
of
streets
that
need
asphalt,
overlay
and
as
someone
who
travels
in
literally
every
ward
of
the
city
over
the
course
of
a
week
or
so
I
see
firsthand.
We
have
some
streets
that
are
in
great
shape.
A
We
have
some
streets
that
are
in
you
know
adequate
shape
and
we
have
some
streets
that
are
in
a
very
poor
shape
that
need
that
asphalt
overlay
for
both
pedestrians
in
some
instances
where
there
are
no
sidewalks
cyclists
that
use
the
sides
or
the
main
road
and
motorists.
So
I
would
ask
members
of
council
for
their
support.
A
This
allows
us
to
do
a
little
bit
more
than
we
were
going
to
do
and
the
reason
I've
asked
for
the
rules
to
be
suspended
now
is
because,
as
you
know,
we
have
such
a
relatively
short
construction
season
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
get
out
and
fix
as
many
roads
and
as
many
potholes
as
we
can
well.
The
good
weather
is
with
us
so
councillor
de
Roos
on
questions
in
comments.
Please
Thank.
D
You,
mr.
mayor
to
you,
I
have
a
question,
or
maybe
I
just
want
to
bring
your
comment
on
the
patches
and
the
potholes.
I
did
speak
with
Gavin
not
too
long
ago,
but
I
know
we
used
to
use
a
hot
patch
hot
patches
in
the
winter,
and
we
start
and
now
we
using
called
patches
and
it's
not
really
working
out.
D
Maybe
in
your
experience,
maybe
we
should
look
back
to
reinstate
or
reusing
the
hot
patches
because
of
the
is
the
reason
why
they're
not
working,
because
you
are
not
applying
them
right
or
that
is
maybe
more
training
need
to
be
boo
to
be
doing
because
I
know
the
cold
patches
are
working,
but
what
the
weather
we're
having
you
put
the
cold
patches
and
then
our
that,
then
our
snowplow
already
had
them
and
they'll
go
away
and
they're
not
really
catching
up
to
the
road
properly.
Is
it
something?
D
Maybe
you
look
at
it
and
come
back
maybe
to
the
transportation
committee
when
you
bring
your
report
in
next
time
for
for
the
Transportation
Committee
on
that?
Yes,
mr.
mayor,
we
are
continually
looking
at
new
products
to
do
a
better,
more
permanent
fix,
in
fact
we're
evaluating
a
different
type
of
cold
patch
that
is
supposed
to
perform.
What
better
in
wet
and
cold
weather
and
I
can
certainly
come
back
to
Transportation
Committee,
with
the
results
of
that
test.
C
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
I
have
been
working
with
the
mayor's
office,
the
last
two
weeks
on
a
public
inquiry
which
I'll
be
moving
at
the
end
of
our
meeting
about
the
subject
matter,
but
certainly
I
support
additional
resources
being
put
into
this.
The
the
condition
of
roads
in
my
ward
and
across
the
city
are
in
a
very
poor
condition,
and
this
is
part
of
my
public
inquiry,
but
I'm
gonna
ask
this
now.
C
I,
don't
believe
that
the
freeze-thaw
cycle
is
the
only
contributing
factor
to
the
quality
of
our
roads
and
I'd
like
to
know
through
either
the
solicitor
or
the
GM
of
Public
Works.
What
type
of
performance
audits
are
being
done
on
roads,
where
the
condition
has
deteriorated
at
a
much
faster
rate
than
what
is
normally
acceptable?
I
can
think
of
a
couple
roads
in
my
area,
where
staff
do
believe
the
quality
of
the
asphalt
is
at
play,
but
I
certainly
support
the
motion.
But
what
type
of
what
type
of
like
I
said
auditing?
N
So,
mr.
mayor,
first
of
all,
in
the
question
of
the
quality
of
the
Asheville
being
stalled,
we
actually
have
an
active
quality
assurance
program
during
the
construction
of
new
road
projects
when
new
roads
are
actually
built
that
we
we
have
new
specifications
and
we
do
take
samples
and
those
are
tested
and
as
well
as
on-site
construction
in
supervision.
Many
of
the
issues
we're
seeing
are
on
roads
that
are
older
may
predate
the
current
construction
standards.
N
The
roads
may
have
changed
over
time
to
have
higher
higher
or
heavier
traffic
levels
or
which
drainage
conditions
may
have
changed
over
time,
or
it
may
simply
be
due
to
the
age
of
the
road
infrastructure
as
well.
So
we're
we're
in
position
situations
where
we're
repairing
a
road
rather
than
reconstructing
it.
We
are
with
an
underlying
base
that
may
not
be
as
strong
a
condition
as
a
new
road
being
constructed.
So
we
will
be
bringing
a
report
to
committee
and
council
on
that.
N
A
T
Thank
you
now,
just
a
quick
question
in
terms
of
the
the
difference
that
this
will
make,
it
looks
to
be
relatively
significant.
My
understanding
is
that
the
road
resurfacing
budget
in
2017,
the
Capitol,
is
thirty
three
point:
six
million,
adding
an
additional
two
and
a
half
means
you're
getting
about
seven
and
a
half
percent
more
capital
money
into
this.
Is
that
roughly
there
that's
correct
and
then
on
the
operating
side?
How
much
is
that
four
hundred
as
a
percentage
of
the
budget,
it's
in
the
neighborhood
of
about
fifteen
percent?
Okay,
so
again,
fairly
significant?
T
T
D
T
R
You
mr.
mayor
I
just
want
to
echo
what
you
had
to
say.
It
has
been
a
memorable
year
and
not
in
a
good
way,
and
one
statistic
that
I
think
we
should
all
be
aware
of,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
concerns
and
complaints
out
there
about.
What's
the
city,
doing
and
I
can
tell
you,
as
of
yesterday
and
I
checked
with
mr.
Wylie
as
of
yesterday,
city
crews
have
filled
a
hundred
and
forty
eight
thousand
potholes
this
season,
so
the
crews
are
out
there
they're
doing
what
they
can
with
what
they
have.
R
R
This
money
is
going
to
allow
them
to
tackle
those
in
a
very
real
way
and
again,
I
just
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
to
thank
staff
for
being
out
there
in
all
kinds
of
weather
and
and
dealing
with
the
potholes
under
very
adverse
conditions,
whether
it's
rain
or
cold
or
damp
and
I
also
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
remind
the
public
that
one
of
the
ways
that
we
know
about
these
potholes
is
that
you
tell
us.
So
it's
it's
not
a
bother.
R
When
you
get
ahold
of
your
counselor
and
say,
there's
a
pothole
or
you
call
3-1-1
and
say:
there's
a
pothole,
it's
actually
helpful,
it's
something
that
we
encourage
and
your
eyes
on
the
road,
so
to
speak,
the
public
our
eyes
on
the
road
and
when
they
see
potholes.
We
need
to
know
about
that.
We
want
to
hear
about
that.
So
the
Kevin
consent
has
crews
out
to
address
the
most
significant
situations
in
the
city.
So
again,
I
would
urge
everybody
is
forth.
R
A
O
You
mr.
mayor
I'll
just
go
right
to
the
therefore
be
it
resolved,
because
I
think
everybody's,
seeing
the
result
of
the
inquiry
that
councillor,
flurry
and
I
requested
so
therefore
be
resolved.
That
staff
be
directed
to
report
back
to
the
appropriate
Standing
Committee
on
the
establishment
of
a
proactive
monitoring
and
baiting
program
as
part
of
the
longer-term
comprehensive
strategy
for
determining
baseline,
rodent
population
and
potential
funding
sources
for
such
a
program
in
advance
of
the
development
of
the
2018
budget.
Basically,
mr.
O
A
Anyone
else
carried
carried
Elsi
notice.
The
motion
for
consideration
at
subsequent
meetings
beats
emotional
poise,
Mao,
hey
Elsa,
conked
Notice
of
Intent,
a
v10
town
show
notice
of
intent
from
the
Ottawa
committee
housing
corporation
to
hold
the
annual
general
meeting
of
the
shareholder
at
the
council
meeting
scheduled
for
June
14th
2017
motion
introduced
by
laws
most
important
present,
a
cylinder-head
gamma
councillor
Qadri,
please,
second,
by
councillor
Healy.
H
C
You,
your
worship,
it's
a
two
parter
first,
given
that
the
quantity
and
severity
of
potholes
and
overall
road
conditions
exist
in
many
parts
of
River
Ward
and
across
the
city.
What
is
the
City
of
Ottawa
doing
to
research
and
utilize
new
technologies
and
innovative
road,
paving
techniques
to
maximize
the
quality
and
longevity
of
our
roads?
And
my
second
question
which
I've
asked
earlier
but
I,
do
want
to
put
this
on
the
record
with
a
written
reply.
C
S
Thank
you
because,
there's
a
bit
of
background,
it's
quite
a
lengthy
one,
but
I
won't
read
it
all.
It's
essentially
referring
to
the
fact
that
in
I
don't
want
to
say
the
word
demolition
again
in
this
meeting,
but
in
the
demolition
of
homes,
there
is
frequently
a
lot
of
dust
and
unknown
potentially
hazardous
material,
and
it's
become
become
more
and
more
to
my
attention.
S
S
Canna
City,
Clerk
and
solicitor
provide
counsel
with
legally
enforceable
options
to
ensure
that
builders
follow
appropriate
abatement
measures
prior
to
demolition
or
may
a
supplementary
bylaw
be
added
under
the
Building
Code
Act,
requiring
the
proof
of
harmful
substance
abandoned,
including
documentation
for
a
minute
from
the
Ministry
of
Labour,
be
provided
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
demolition
permit.
Are
there
any
other
Ontario
municipalities
which
have
successfully
implemented
such
regulations?
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
this
one
is
directed
at
Chief
Demonte
with
emergency
protective
services.
Construction
projects
can
often
generate
considerable
noise
that
may
disturb
residents,
particularly
on
weekends,
when
they
expect
there
to
be
less
noise
for
a
restful
time.
Well,
the
city
has
measures
in
place
to
help
ensure
accountability
on
its
projects
on
its
own
projects.
Can
staff
police
advise
what
measures
are
currently
in
place
to
mitigate
private
construction,
noise
and
review?
What
opportunities
could
be
developed
to
further
reduce
noise,
destruct
disruption
by
private
developers
in
the
vicinity
of
residential
properties?
Thank.
A
You
before
German
our
last
count,
sir
cadre
is,
as
we
all
know,
the
Senators
have
been
in
quite
a
remarkable
playoff
series
with
the
Penguins
and
last
night,
obviously
was
a
must-win
they
did
and
councillor
cobby
has
the
honor
of
hosting
the
CTC
in
his
ward.
So
a
few
comments
councillor
on
wishing
our
sends
the
very
best
thank.
H
A
And
we're
not
going
to
allow
counselor
Sher
Ali
to
talk
about
any
parade
or
anything
like
that.
One
game
at
a
time,
one
game
at
a
time
and
we
wish
the
Senators
the
very
best
they've
brought
a
lot
of
excitement
and
pride
to
our
city,
and
we
we
know
it's.
It's
been
a
tough
series,
but
boy
if
they
had
been
playing
well
in
the
last
month
or
so
councilor
caucus
I
was.