►
From YouTube: Planning Committee – November 10, 2015
Description
Planning Committee meeting – November 10, 2015 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
B
Thank
everyone.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
one
to
four
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
listed
above.
Only
those
who
make
oil
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
intera
Municipal
Board.
B
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
of
Council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
120
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
zoning
in
180
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
a
comment
sheet
is
available
at
the
door,
as
always
for
anyone
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
on
these
amendments
and
before
we
get
started
today.
I
wanted
to
let
everyone
know
that
it's
with
deep
sadness
that
I
must
announce
the
passing
of
philip
brown.
The
chair
of
the
committee
of
adjustment.
B
Earlier
this
year,
philip
was
appointed
for
a
third
term.
As
a
member
of
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
was
elected
by
his
peers
to
serve
as
chair
for
a
second
consecutive
term,
he
represented
the
committee
with
enthusiasm
with
a
sense
of
fairness
and
with
the
highest
degree
of
competence,
phil
embodied
the
saying
a
life
well-lived.
He
was
a
thoughtful
listener,
a
tireless
contributor
to
all
the
different
communities
to
which
he
belonged
and
a
generous
soul
to
all
he
met.
B
Many
of
you
will
have
known
Phil
an
active
community
member
having
sat
on
numerous
committees
and
boards
of
nonprofit
organizations.
He
was
a
true
community
builder
and
a
truly
wonderful
person.
I
know
his
loss
will
be
deeply
felt.
Phil
was
humble
about
his
many
contributions,
but
we
are
all
better
off
as
a
result
of
his
many
volunteer
efforts.
I
know
from
my
part
and
I
first
met
Phil
when
I
was
an
opinion
counselor
so
many
years
ago,
actually,
18
years
ago,
today,
I
was
elected
and
memorial
service
to
celebrate.
B
You
know
for
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
you
know
what
do
you
think
my
chances
are
I,
don't
think
I
was
ever
on
the
on
the
committee
that
chose
the
people,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
that's
just
a
testament
to
the
kind
of
enthusiasm
he
had
about
serving
our
city.
So
would
you
all
stand
please
and
just
join
me
for
a
moment
of
silence
and
memory.
I've
felt
well.
B
B
The
first
item
is
zoning
bylaw
amendment
forty
one,
forty,
nine
and
4175
strand
her
drive
in
my
ward
and
bar
Haven
and
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
any
speakers
like
usual
bar
Haven?
What
can
they
say?
You
know
it's
it's
new
build
exactly
so
is
that
carried
number
two?
Is
zoning
bylaw
amendment
three
thirty
six
or
five
Paul
Anka
Drive
we
have
a
councillor.
Dean's
is
here
with
us.
This
is
in
her
ward.
B
This
is
a
planning
committee
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
254
3605,
paul
anka
drive
to
permit
a
hotel
as
an
additional
land
use
as
detailed
in
document
two.
We
don't
have
any
speaker
we
do
have.
We
have
a
technical
amendment.
We
don't
have
any
speakers
on
this,
so
the
technical
amendment
Oh
Dennis
you're.
Here
you
only
need
to
speak
if
necessary,
we're
not
going
to
carry
it.
Okay,
so
can
we
have
the
technical
amendment
Vice
Chair
Tierney?
B
C
B
Okay,
councillor
Dean's,
that
you
was
that,
okay
with
you
sure
so
that's
carried
on
the
technical
amendment
and
then
on
the
item
as
amended.
Carry
thank
you.
The
next
one
we're
having
a
presentation
on
it:
400,
Albert
Street
and
at
383,
Slater
and
item
number
four.
Is
the
Preston
Street
north
traditional
Main
Street
study,
which
we
were
going
to
have
a
presentation
on
as
well
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work
went
into
both
of
these.
B
B
It
for
presentation,
we
do
have
another
item
and
councillor
guayas
here
and
with
your
indulgence,
I'd
like
to
just
deal
with
it
right
now.
This
is
in
his
ward
vice
charity
and
he's
going
to
move
the
move,
move
the
item,
and
it
basically
is
on
marival
Road,
where
the
target
was
which
of
course,
is
leaving
a
gaping
wound
on
Marable
Road,
the
fitness
club,
no
body
would
like
to
go
in
and
we
have
to
make
a
little
bit
of
adjustment
vice-chair
Tierney.
Thank.
C
You,
madam
chair,
so
first
of
all,
I,
do
have
this
first
motion
that
the
planning
committee
approved
the
addition
of
this
item
for
consideration
at
the
committee.
Today's
planning
committee,
pursuant
to
section
89
3
the
procedural
bylaw
motion
to
repeal
bylaw
2015
45
as
it
affects
the
rear
portion
of
1585,
never
Road.
So.
C
D
B
C
On
to
me,
motion
I'll
just
read
it
first
of
all,
whereas
on
February
25th,
2015
Council
passed
by
a
law,
2015
45,
which
amended
the
zoning
of
numerous
properties
along
the
designated
area,
mewn
Street
and
introduced
a
new
zoning
regulation
to
promote
active
street
frontage,
whereas
it
was
not
intended
that
this
amendment
applied
to
those
portions
of
the
properties
were
the
grade.
Abutted
the
street
restrictions,
the
ability
of
the
development
of
and
actively
interact
with
the
street
and
whereas
the
rear
portion
of
1585
Melville
Road
is
one
of
such
of
those
such
properties.
C
That
was
resumed
but
not
have
been
based
on
the
aforementioned
intent
and
whereas
the
reasoning
is
prohibited,
the
approved
development
complies
with
the
City
of
Ottawa
zoning
bylaw.
As
it's
read
prior
to
the
passage
of
bylaw
2015
45
therapy
resolved
that
the
Planning
Committee
recommended
to
council
repeal
bylaw
2015
45
in
son
of
as
it
applies
to
the
rear
portion
of
1585
Melville
Road
and
as
more
specifically
described
in
the
attached
map.
Now,
I
just
want
to
speak
to
this.
Madam
chair.
C
B
F
You,
madam
chair
I,
think
it
was,
and
why
are
we
here
today?
Councilor
were
dealing
with
application
for
site
plan
control,
they've
gone
through
extensive
review,
public
consultation
through
a
counselor
guys
office.
They
are
at
the
building,
permit
stage
review,
and
this
issue
has
been
identified.
That
would
prohibit
them
from
being
able
to
complete
the
site
plan
control
process
and
have
a
building
permit
issued
in
a
timely
matter.
It
is
a
bit
sensitive
with
winter
approaching
the
project
the
Movado
fitness
center
complies
with
all
the
underlying
zoning
provisions.
F
It
meets
the
intent
of
the
AM
zone
and
the
marival
and
the
Miraval
plan.
This
was
brought
to
our
attention,
in
speaking
with
the
drafters
of
the
am
10
zone
bylaw
and
intend
to
have
active
street
fine
G's
along
Merivale
Road,
and
just
to
clarify
that
intent
that
bill
form
that
public
realm
that
we're
trying
to
achieve
is
not
lost
through
this.
F
Through
this
motion,
it's
the
rear
portion
of
the
site
where
the
grades
make
it
not
realistic
or
there's
no
real
ability
to
implement
that
type
of
desired
street
frontage
on
the
ruler
portion
of
the
site.
Only
and
you'll
see
the
lands
affected.
Map
are
talking
about,
the
rear
of
the
existing
Meadowlands,
mall
Plaza
and
the
remainder
of
the
site
will
come,
will
still
have
the
a
m10
provisions
apply.
G
That
is
what
we're
actually
debating
and
so
I
think
it's
it's
worthy
to
allow
members
of
the
public
when
we
give
proper
notice
of
motion
through
the
agenda
process
that
they're
aware
of
what's
being
proposed
and
have
the
opportunity
to
comment.
That's
that's
my
main
concern
this
morning.
So
I'm
like
everyone
else.
Yes,
everyone
else
has
never
never
indicated
that
as
well,
and
certainly
don't
want
to
stifle
what's
intended
here.
B
F
There
it
is
today,
council,
would
be
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
issue
a
building
permit.
We
have
a
situation
where,
with
the
am
10
promotion
provisions
being
approved,
we
under
appeal
our
staff
reviews
the
most
restrictive
provisions
of
the
bylaw.
We
have
no
set
timeframe
when
the
am
10
hearing
will
be
dealt
with,
but
of
abundance
of
caution.
We
review
a
building
permit
application
under
both
sets
of
bylaws
that
it
that
it
could
in
fact
comply
with
both
provisions,
the
more
restrictive
always
being
the
the
greater
test.
F
Through
the
review
of
this
application
and
the
the
end
of
the
day
it
would,
it
would
impact
the
issuance
of
the
permit
and
the
project
camila
to
move
forward
at
a
time
a
matter.
The
project
would
still
conform
with
the
underlying
am
zone
provisions
which
would
be
in
place
if
the
repeal
was
successful,
but.
D
F
F
D
H
Thanks
yeah
I
know
it
was
really
helpful
for
me
to
see
the
map
which
didn't
come
up
on
the
screen,
but
just
that
I
understand
so
I
see
area.
A
in
front
of
me,
which
house
was
just
stated,
is
in
the
back
of
the
property
so
within
area
a
what
will
the
site
plan
look
like
the
building
is
coming
at
the
back
of
area
a
and
then
it's
parking
in
front
or
what's
the
treatment
of
the
actual
site.
F
Within
Area
Council,
you
would
see
between
Meadowlands,
Drive
and
I'll
call
it
North
the
northern
edge
of
the
property.
There
will
be
a
parking
field
in
front
of
the
Malati
fitness
center
and
the
building
the
new
seventy-five
thousand
square
foot
building
would
be
located
on
the
northern
edge
of
area.
A.
I
No
chair
so
first
off,
let
me
say
this
is
probably
the
the
most
positive
development
proposal
that
I've
come
forward.
My
word
in
five
years
we
had
a
public
meeting.
Everybody
walked
out
of
that
meeting,
excited
about
it.
It
is
going
to
revitalize
where
the
target
was,
which
is
it's
one
of
the
few
target
locations
that
has
not
been
picked
up
by
Walmart
or
or
somebody
else.
It's
a
difficult
space
to
fill,
and
while
it
won't
fill
the
target
spot,
it
will
be
behind
it.
I
The
feeling
is
once
that
goes
in
it
will
attract
other
businesses
to
revitalize
that
whole
mall
in
and
of
itself.
The
Malladi
project
is
going
to
create
a
hundred
and
twenty
jobs
in
a
neighborhood,
and
in
in
my
word,
that
could
certainly
use
that.
It
also
is
going
to
bring
two
pools
to
a
neighborhood
again
that
doesn't
have
easy
access
to
pools
because
we
don't
have
City,
the
closest
city
pool
I
think
is
the
Sports
Plex.
I
That
I
believe
was
councilor
leaper
manat
front
on
nerville
Road.
It
fronts
on
Meadowlands
Drive,
so
the
intent
of
the
bylaw
to
create
the
difference
along
the
road
is
still
there
and
intact
and
will
be
for
whatever
goes
into
the
actual
target
spot.
This
is
behind
there.
The
fronts
on
the
Meadowlands
as
I,
say
it's
it's
very
well
received
within
my
community
and
I.
Think
it's
a
great
infrastructure
and
an
economic
investment
in
my
community,
and
it's
something
that
the
residents
of
my
my
Ward
are
very
excited
about,
would
like
to
see.
Go
forward.
I
It
hasn't
been
months
that
this
has
been
an
issue.
It's
just
come
up
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks.
They
have
more
body
has
has
is,
has
a
very
aggressive
design
and
built
program.
They
want
to
be
up
and
open
and
running
before
the
end
of
next
year.
I
applaud
that
as
I
say,
it's
going
to
create
jobs
and
opportunities
for
people
on
my
ward,
they're
ready
to
go,
and
this
full
occupation
was
an
error.
I
It
was
never
meant
to
include
properties
that
didn't
actually
front
on
to
Miraval,
Road
and,
and
this
one
clearly
doesn't,
as
Simon
pointed
out,
anything
that
comes
along
for
the
actual
targets,
water,
anything
else
and
that
mall
will
fall
into
the
existing
bylaw
and
won't
be
impacted
by
the
proposal
here
today.
So
again,
I
would
hope
that
I
have
everybody
support.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
okay,
so
maybe
the
next
time
I
ask
if
we
can
deal
with
something
ahead
of
time.
It
would
be
better
if
I
knew
that
we'd
have
that
kind
of
discussion.
I
was
trying
to
to
move
things
along,
so
we
will
go
back
to
our
first
held
item
and
we
have
a
presentation-
and
our
first
held
item
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
400
Albert
Street
at
383,
Slater
Street.
B
That
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw,
2008
2002,
54,
400,
Albert
Street
to
permit
a
27
story,
mixed-use
building
with
commercial
uses
at
grade
and
residential
above
as
shown
in
document
1
and
as
detailed
and
documents
2
&
3,
and
we
do
have
a
couple
of
speakers
on
this
item,
but
Don
her
wire
and
Andrew
McCrea
are
here
to
give
us
a
presentation.
So
thank
you.
J
Create
with
the
planning
department,
so
the
item
before
you
today
is
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
400
Albert
Street,
also
known
as
383
Slater
Street,
so
the
subject
site
is
bound
and
has
frontage
on
Albert
Street
lion,
Street,
Slater,
Street
and
Bay
Street,
400,
Albert
and
its
entirety.
If
you
look
at
the
street,
Street
screen
comprises
of
both
area
a
and
B
put
together.
J
The
specific
proposal
that
we're
dealing
dealing
with
for
the
27
story
building
is
located
in
area
a
and
that's
the
portion
of
the
site,
which
is
known
as
383
Slater,
so
context
we
are
centrally
located
to
the
north
east
and
south
is
a
mix
of
high-rise
buildings,
both
residential
and
commercial
subjects.
That
is
also
within
less
than
300
meters
walking
distance
to
the
lion
LRT
station,
which
is
at
the
intersection
of
lion
and
queen
further
west
of
Bay
Street.
J
You
start
to
get
into
a
few
high-rise,
mid-rise
and
and
low-rise
development,
as
well
so
site
context
centrally
located.
Looking
at
the
subject
site
today
it
is
a
two-story
commercial
building.
It's
the
alternative
savings
office
and
the
ground-floor
is
a
commercial
parking
lot.
So
looking
east.
This
is
standing
on
the
corner
of
band
Slater
and
you
can
see
the
two-story
built
form
right
up
to
the
sidewalks
edge
and
then
looking
West
back
at
the
site,
how
you
get
some
context
for
the
immediate
surroundings.
J
So
the
specific
proposal
is
for
a
27
story:
mixed-use
building
it's
300
residential
rental
units,
which
would
make
up
the
upper
storeys
and
ground-floor
commercial,
some
images
here,
what
the
podium
and
that
great
treatment
would
look
like
and
the
building
itself
in
its
full
perspective.
So
we
are
located
in
the
central
area
designation
of
the
Official
Plan.
J
This
does
call
for
a
broad
range
of
uses
also
calls
for
a
lively
mix
of
day
and
nighttime
uses
to
put
activity
on
the
street
urban
design
and
compatibility
is
important
as
well
to
ensure
appropriate
building
heights
compatibility
transition,
human
scale
adding
to
the
pedestrian
environment.
With
regards
to
OPA
150,
we
also
have
specific
policy
direction
for
high-rises
dealing
with
tower
separations,
so
looking
for
tower
separation
of
23
meters
or
greater
smaller
floor
plates
for
residential
buildings
and
taking
into
consideration
the
development
potential
of
the
surroundings.
J
Specifically,
the
property
is
located
in
the
Upper
Town
designation
of
the
central
area
secondary
plan.
This
designation
calls
for
predominantly
residential
uses
and
again
adds
that
policy
direction
for
an
enhanced
pedestrian
environment
and
a
development
that
considers
its
surrounding
high-rise.
Development
is
permitted
again
in
the
secondary
plan
and
talks
about
compatibility
and
maintaining
Heights
that
were
within
the
view,
plane.
Protection,
Department
and
the
proposal
does
satisfy
that
criteria
quickly.
On
the
zoning
the
subject
site
today
is
zoned
r5
q,
it's
a
residential
fifth
density
zone
with
site-specific
exceptions
and
schedule
89.
J
The
proposed
zoning
carries
forward
this
type
of
zoning,
keeping
it
residential
and
what's
happening
in
the
details
of
recommended
zoning.
Is
that
exception,
242
and
schedule
89
get
modified
to
accommodate
this
specific
proposal
on
the
corner
of
Bayon
Slater
and
looking
at
the
balance
of
the
site
and
what
should
be
permitted.
You'll
see
two
holdings
owns
the
first
one
is
dictated
our
dovetailed
towards
the
proposed
twenty
seven
story.
Building
corner
of
bans
later
that
holding
zone
requires
that
a
temporary
park
be
provided
in
conjunction
with
this
development.
J
So
the
specific
amendments
being
requested
is
an
increase
in
building
height,
85
meters,
whereas
today
the
current
schedule
is
permit
46
and
7,
allowing
majority
of
the
ground-floor
to
be
commercial
use,
a
reduction
in
landscaping
from
23%,
whereas
30
is
required
amenity
area
at
a
rate
of
5
point
2,
whereas
6
is
required,
a
reduced
parking,
I'll
width
and
then
yard
and
setbacks
as
per
the
current
schedules
and
exceptions.
What
I
want
to
show
you
here
quickly
is
a
conceptual
plan.
Only
at
the
corner
of
the
insulator
you
see,
phase
1
there.
J
That
is
the
footprint
of
the
specific
building
being
proposed,
but
with
the
intent
here
is
to
show
is
that
what
the
holding
provisions
put
in
place?
This
demonstrates
a
possibility
of
how
phase,
2
or
phase
3
could
be
developed,
ensuring
that
we
do
have
appropriate
tower
separation.
More
than
23
meters,
in
this
case
the
ability
to
provide
mid
block
connections
publicly
open
space.
So
all
those
protections
are
put
into
the
zoning
to
say
when
building
one
gets
built.
J
We
know
that
building
2
or
3
and
phase
2
can
be
done
appropriately
in
accordance
with
our
policy
direction.
So
I
just
want
to
wrap
up
by
making
the
recommendation
that
staff
are
asked
for
the
details.
Above
and
then
you
know,
staff
report
we
do
recommend
approval.
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
Planning
Act
provincial
policy
statement
official
plan,
our
guidelines
on
high-rise
housing,
the
supporting
plans
and
studies
submitted
with
the
application
represent
good
planning.
So
we
do
recommend
approval
for
what's
before
so
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
think
you've
done
a
good
job
here
on
meeting
all
the
minimum
requirements,
but
I've
got
to
admit,
I'm,
very
disappointed
with
the
design.
The
look
of
this
I
thought
we
were
trying
for
our
downtown
core
to
have
all
the
new
buildings
be
inspirational
or
to
look
a
little
better
than
just
a
box
going
up.
Is
there
any
effort
here
or
any
opportunity
to
make?
We
work
on
that
design
a
little.
I
J
Two
points
on
that
front:
the
application
is
required
to
go
back
to
you,
DRP.
Our
urban
design
review
panel
through
the
site
plan
applications.
So
there
is
an
opportunity
to
still
further
discuss
design.
They
did
go
for
a
pre
consultation
with
you.
Drp
unit
was
very
well
received.
A
lot
of
the
discussion
about
the
height
and
treatment
of
human
scale,
really
transpires
when
you
look
at
the
different
building
on
the
undulations
and
material
treatment,
but
in
short,
it
does
go
back
to
you
TRP,
and
there
will
be
an
opportunity
to
further
discuss
design
perfect.
H
Just
questions
for
staff,
so
maybe
I'll
start
just
with
a
factual
question
on
document
2,
which
is
page
17
of
our
report
under
subparagraph
3.
It
looks
like
the
zoning
change
is
maximum
height
limits
shown
on
schedule,
89
a
may
exceed
90,
so
no
permitted
projections
may
exceed
91
meters,
but
then
the
maximum
building
height
of
85
meters
is
that
six
meter
differential
for
just
additional
AC
and
other
work
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
the
six
meter
difference
is
precisely.
H
Thank
you.
The
next
question
is
just
on
section
37.
It
was
clear
in
the
report
that
in
this
case,
the
section
37
benefits
are
being
based
on
gross
floor
area
and
it
sounds
like
what's
happened
through
the
various
Changez
and
whatever
the
exception
283
or
whatever.
That
was
that
you've
taken
an
overall
gross
floor
area
for
the
site
as
opposed
to
the
individual
Lots
or
the
individual
development
applications,
and
so
since
this
one
is
sort
of
eating
up
what
18,000
of
37,000
permitted
cubed
meters.
H
J
Thank
you
Ken.
So,
through
the
chair,
you'll
note
in
the
zoning
provisions
that
the
lot
400
Albertson
in
its
entirety
is
treated
as
one
lot
for
zoning
purposes.
That
is
to
ensure
that,
as
the
development
moves
forward,
whether
it's
phase
1
2
or
3,
that
landmark
GF
a
of
the
39,000
and
change,
goes
with
the
property
as
a
whole.
So
ownership
aside,
that
number
keeps
getting
filled
in
as
development
happens
and
if
it
ever
goes
beyond
25%
of
what's
allowed
today,
that's
when
section
37
would
get
triggered
so
I
guess.
H
In
some
ways,
any
future
or
owner
of
that
site
needs
to
be
aware
that
they
would
be
bearing
the
brunt
of
any
section.
37
benefits,
as
opposed
to
the
existing
applicant,
who
sort
of
gets
to
eat
up
18
of
the
37,
and
that
would
obviously
be
the
due
diligence
that
any
potential
owner
would
have
to
undertake.
Yes,.
J
H
H
There
is
a
step
back
on
Slater
Street
of
only
1.3
meters,
so
you
know
from
essentially
a
couple
stories
up
all
the
way
almost
to
the
top
of
the
building.
We're
only
stepping
back
this
much
on
the
front
where
we
expect
a
lot
of
the
pedestrian
activity,
but
yet
on
the
rear
of
the
property.
That
step
back
is
five
point
four
meters
and
I
guess.
H
My
question
is
in
light
of
the
Official
Plan,
we
have
guidelines
on
transitions
which
I
think
are
to
encourage
or
or
discourage,
the
Canyon
effect
and
but
I
guess
in
my
mind,
a
one
point:
three
to
step
back
from
nine
meters
to
81
doesn't
really
discourage
the
Canyon
effect.
So
why
was
there
a
decision
made
to
not
have
a
greater
front
step
back
to
give
more
of
a
podium
to
the
street
side?
That
really
matters
on
this
property.
J
Through
the
chair,
it
probably
best
to
draw
your
attention
to
the
actual
photo.
That's
on
the
screen
right
now.
It
shows
that
there
are
different
setbacks
and
stuff
in
the
actual
building
design.
So
it's
it's
not
a
1.3
that
is
carried
from
podium
all
the
way
up
to
the
top.
You
see
different
parts
of
the
building
coming
further
out
or
further
back.
That
1.3
represents
its
closest
point
to
the
podium
you
can
see
in
the
screen
there.
J
The
white
part
of
the
building
would
represent
that
1.3
and
the
darker
glazing
is
actually
further
setback
than
that.
So
you
get
some
some
different
articulation
and
it
makes
for
uninteresting
prasad
and
contributes
to
that
human
scale
feel
of
the
treatment
of
the
podium,
and
that
could
also
be
another
item
that
is
further
discussed
at
UD
RP
through
the
site
plan.
Yeah.
H
Because
I
guess,
ultimately,
you
know
for
from
my
measure
at
least
80%
of
the
frontage
on
Slater
is
going
to
have
only
the
1.3
you're
right
that
at
the
corner
there's
a
greater
step
back
but
again
I'm.
The
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I'm
just
trying
to
align
this
guidance
in
the
Official,
Plan
and
I
think
a
tendency
that
we've
had
as
a
city
towards
having
podiums
as
councillor
hubely
said.
You
know,
we
want
to
sort
of
make
sure
that
the
town
core
is
not
only
attractive
but
also
livable
and
I'm.
I
guess.
H
The
worry
is
that
if
80%
of
the
frontage
you're
standing
there
looking
up
at
81
meters,
because
that's
not
going
to
make
much
of
a
difference,
would
it
make
sense,
as
part
of
site
plan
approval
to
have
staff
just
work
with
the
applicant
to
see?
If
there's
anything
that
can
be
done
to
increase
that,
given
that
you've
got
this
5.4,
which
is
more
than
this
more
than
what's
needed
in
the
back?
Is
there
not
the
opportunity
to
shift
the
main
part
of
the
tower
to
give
the
pedestrian
or
the
user
of
the
street?
J
So
through
the
chair
with
respect
to
moving
the
building
sort
of
in
its
footprint
back
towards
the
properties,
perhaps
what
you're
not
seeing
on
this
image
is
right
at
the
corner
of
Albert
and
bathe.
There
are
two
three-story
apartment
buildings
and
their
zoning
there
to
allow
I
think
for
up
to
12
stories.
So
the
closer
you
move
this
project
back,
you
create
a
situation
that
may
have
a
negative
impact
on
those
properties
that
are
in
behind
versus
putting
a
building
closer
to
the
street,
with
a
good
urban
design
and
contribute
to
the
slater
Street.
H
Just
to
be
clear,
and
maybe
mr.
Mizzy
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
move
the
whole
building
envelope.
I
know
that
would
be
much
too
complicated
at
this
stage.
It's
really
the
issue
of
the
tower,
not
the
podium.
So
what
I'm?
Talking
about
the
five
point?
Two
meters
is
not
it's
not
the
dimensions
of
the
actual
podium.
It's
just.
H
E
C
C
C
B
You
remember
when
we
well
and
you're
not
going
to
remember
this
detail,
I'm
sure
that
nobody
memorized
the
order
of
the
work
plan
just
in
case
somebody
did.
It
was
farther
in
the
in
the
term,
and
you
know,
given
some
of
the
work
that
we
are
undertaking,
including
the
building
better,
revitalize
neighborhoods,
that
the
next
year
will
be
the
year
that
we
spend
on
that.
It's
important
that
we
have
that.
So
we
we
are
advancing
that
tower
sort
of
sure
that
we'll
want
to
be
involved
in
that
for
sure.
Okay,
so
note
to
I.
B
B
We
need
to
do
more
of
that.
Actually,
I
would
like
to
see
it.
We
have
the
counselors
lounge
that
in
the
past,
we've
used
quite
well
from
time
to
time.
We
could
have
sessions
there
and
that
sort
of
thing
and
invite
people
to
come
in
so
that
we
are
we've
got
time
to
think
about
it
before
we
actually
see
a
report
before
us
or
we're
personally
engaged
counselor
brockington
questions.
B
G
You,
madam
chair
and
I'd,
like
to
thank
staff
for
their
presentation.
I.
Just
thank
you
for
placing
this
on
the
agenda.
Just
a
few
questions
for
clarification.
The
first
is
regarding
the
car
park
in
the
garage.
How
does
the
122
get
determined?
Is
that
determined
by
the
developers
there
a
formula
or
is
that
what
they
can
squeeze
in.
J
J
B
It
also
is
located
at
one
of
our
LRT
stops,
and
so
I'll
tell
you
when
several
years
ago,
when
the
city
is
looking
to
purchase
that
block
before
broccolini
did
for
our
Central
Library.
When
we're
looking
at
a
much
larger
library,
we
actually
considered
not
having
any
parking
because
of
the
proximity
to
the
which
is
not,
which
is
what
Chicago
has.
It
has
an
own
station
now
and
library
station
on
the
L,
so
they
don't
have
any
park
in
there
either.
So
there
was
that
consideration,
any
other
questions
that
can
survive.
Yes,.
G
J
G
And
thank
you
just
the
the
green
space.
The
report
talks
about
the
the
phased
development
and
during
that
phase
there
would
be
a
green
space
provided
or
mini
parkland
again.
There
is
no
requirement
to
provide
that
during
full
build-out,
but
during
a
transition
that
is
the
request
of
the
community
and
we're
going
to
see
that
through.
Can
you
just
comment
again
the
requirement
versus
a
nice
to
have
the
difference
between
those
two?
Yes,.
J
Through
the
chair
there,
there
is
a
requirement
actually
in
both
instances
with
this
first
development
through
site
plan,
there
is
a
requirement
for
a
temporary
park
that
is
a
gapping
exercise
until
we
know
what
is
proposed
for
Phase
two
and
our
phase
three
and
in
the
in
the
details
of
the
zoning.
When
phase
two
and/or
phase
three
is
developed,
there's
actually
a
requirement
to
provide
567
square
meters
of
publicly
accessible
open
space.
That
is
a
minimum.
So
when
the
site
is
built
out
in
its
entirety,
you'll
have
at
least
that
much
public
space.
G
F
G
B
E
J
There
are
a
range
of
non-residential
uses
that
are
community
oriented
permitted
on
the
site,
including
both
retail
food
store,
retail
personal
service
business.
So
all
those
uses
are
permitted
on
the
ground
floor
of
this
building.
There
is
even
a
provision
that
a
retail
food
store
be
a
minimum
500
square
metres.
E
Madam
chair,
as
a
theoretical
matter
committee,
would
have
the
authority
to
zone
for
standards
with
respect
to
the
size
of
the
facilities
or
to
narrow
down
or
to
widen
the
range
of
nancial
non-residential
uses
in
question.
That
would,
of
course,
have
to
be
a
planning
rationale
behind
that
decision.
Word
appeal
to
the
Internet's
purport.
K
You,
madam
chair,
so
no
secret
that
that
this
community
would
consider
this
a
while
building
with
it
with
a
grocery
store
in
the
bottom.
It's
it
is
an
amenity
that
is
that
is
needed
in
the
in
the
community.
So
just
to
pick
up
on
what
councillor
brockington
us
and
I
know
that
we
can't
compel
someone.
You
know
the
owner
of
grocery
chain
to
locate
anywhere,
but
we
can
I
just
want
to
get
clarification.
K
E
K
Just
a
couple
other
questions,
I
just
want
to
ask
about
the
the
green
space
that
that's
required
here.
It
is.
It
is
temporary
right
now
because
of
the
the
phasing
in
of
the
the
full
development.
But
what
can
we
do
to
ensure
that
it
remains
public
and
accessible
that
that
it
can't
be
fenced
off,
or
you
know,
thorn
bushes
put
around
or
something
that
would
keep?
You
know
people
from
from
accessing
it
too
the
same
they
would
for
a
fully
public
park.
K
J
K
So
the
location
of
the
parking
garage
off
base
Street
was
the
other.
The
other
concern
that
I
had
there
was
a
cycling
lane
on
on
base.
Street
and
vehicles
are
gonna
have
to
cross
over
that
to
enter
an
exit
they
the
building.
So
what
can
we
do
at
site
plan
that
will
make
it
safer
for
both
pedestrians
and
cyclists,
when
those
vehicles
are
coming
in
and
out
of
the
building?
J
The
counter
that
is
a
question
that
we
have
asked
of
of
the
applicant
in
our
site
plan
comments,
and
the
short
answer
is
yes,
there
is
something
that
can
be
done,
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
to
that
is
at
this
point
of
the
process,
but
whether
it's
lighting
mirroring
a
different
set
back
of
the
garage.
Ultimately,
the
city
has
the
same
interest
in
ensuring
pedestrian
and
cyclist
safety,
and
it
would
be
addressed
through
site
plan.
Okay,.
K
Thank
you.
I
know
that
a
resident
is
here
to
speak
to
from
151
Bay,
so
I
just
want
to
make
just
a
quick
comment
that
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
as
we
move
forward.
We
recognize
that
this
isn't
being
done
in
isolation.
There's
a
lot
going
on
in
this
neighborhood.
We
have
an
established
condominium
here
at
151,
Bay
LRT
is
being
built.
Queen
Street
is
being
renewed.
K
A
lot
of
development
applications
right
around
this
at
this
building,
so
just
for
us
to
be
able
to
keep
that
in
mind
that
we're
building
almost
a
full
community
here
so
going
forward.
We've
worked
very
closely
with
you,
but
to
continue
to
do
that
and
keep
in
mind
everything
that
is
happening
to
make
sure
that
that
we
are
integrating.
You
know
whether
it's
green
space
and
traffic
patterns,
and
not
to
you
know
not
to
just
have
applications
come
in
isolation
of
each
other.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
Couple
of
quick
green
questions.
The
mr.
Murcia
spoke
to
the
urban
design
guidelines
for
high-rise
buildings
in
the
urban
area.
One
of
the
things
that
it
calls
for
is
planting
trees
and
then
the
the
renderings
I
see
trees.
Has
any
thought
been
given
to
how
to
ensure
that
those
trees
actually
survive?
I,
think
a
lot
of
people
will
be
taking
a
look
at
the
rendering
and
fairly
cynical
that
we
can
never
get
anything
approaching
a
mature
tree
to
survive
and
that
in
that
environment.
J
It
is
being
looked
at
through
site
plan
control.
There
are
trees
proposed
along
slater.
There's
been
questions
back
to
the
op
can
about
what
we
can
do
for
landscaping
along
Bay
Street
as
well
in
a
downtown
urban
environment.
Sylva
cells
seem
to
be
working
well,
but
that
is
something
that
will
be
looked
at
in
more
detail
through
site
plan
to
ensure
that
if
a
tree
is
planted
along
Slater
Street
one
of
those
Street
conditions
and
how
to
ensure
that
it
does
survive.
Essentially,
okay,.
D
New,
the
trees
will
be
an
important
part
as
the
buses
come
off
downtown.
We've
got
an
amazing
opportunity
to
make
downtown
vibrant
again
I
think
trees
are
going
to
be
an
important
part
of
that,
let's,
let's
think
through
very
carefully
how
to
ensure
they
survive.
The
the
other
part
of
the
urban
design
that
guidelines
for
high-rise
speaks
to
stormwater
management
through
things
like
green
roofs,
etc.
What
kind
of
stormwater
innovations
in
stormwater
management,
through
initiatives
like
green
roofs,
are
being
thought
for
this
building.
B
L
L
You
very
much,
madam
chairman,
and
thank
you
to
all
counselors
and
it's
very
encouraging
to
hear
many
questions
being
raised
that
reflect
our
own
concerns
in
the
development.
One
of
the
many
developments
in
our
area,
Park
square-ish,
was
shown
on
the
site
plan.
It
is
the
large
condominium
bounded
by
here.
We
go.
Thank
you.
Yes,
there
we
go
back
up
to
the
a
and
B
one
there.
That's
it.
L
Mr.
McCray
is
showing
it
on
the
the
plan.
The
construction
began
in
1976
now
building
it
has
142
units.
We
are
bounded
by
Albert
Street
to
the
South
Queen
to
the
north
and
Bay
to
the
West
Bay
being
the
big
roof.
We
think
there's
a
huge
opportunity
for
creative
and
innovative
work
to
be
done
in
the
city
core.
We
do
have,
however,
think
that,
in
terms
of
siloing,
the
the
Opera,
the
construction
of
this
building,
we're
missing
opportunities
that
should
exist.
L
It
has
been
raised
here
by
councilor,
McKenney
and
and
others
are,
are
concerned
with
the
safety
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
along
Bay
Street
Bay
Street
is
a
major
route
to
Gatineau.
It's
not
just
a
city
street.
It's
a
major
thoroughfare
for
people
and
for
bikes,
it's
a
one-way
street,
as
you
know,
and
it
leads
to
Wellington
Western,
Parkway
and
Quebec.
It's
been
identified
by
Ottawa
moves
that
more
north
south
north
bicycle
paths
are
needed,
and
this
is
truly
a
very
well
traveled
route.
L
L
Well,
we
understand
that
there's
no
need
to
have
parking.
There
will
be
far
more
than
122
residents
in
the
in
the
tower.
There
is
no
provision
for
commercial
or
visitor
parking,
yet
commercial
space
is
going
to
be
there
and,
as
we
move
to
have
more
and
more
people
take
bikes
and
public
transport
and
to
walk
itself.
We
have
to
remember
that
there
still
need
to
be
deliveries
that
there
need
to
be
for
particularly
old,
the
elderly
and
more
and
more
people
of
the
elderly
are
choosing
the
downtown
lifestyle.
L
We
need
to
think
ahead
for
the
lifespan
of
the
building
and
we
hope
that
some
way
that
visitor
parking
or
creative
use
of
battery
charging
stations
special
spots
there
for
virtue
cars
and
others
be
thought
so
that
we
can
be
thinking
into
the
into
the
future
use
of
it.
Landscaping
is
an
important
feature
and
when
we
looked
at
the
other
place,
what
is
called
a
park
at
on
the
plan
is
going
to
be
surrounded
by
buildings.
L
So
if
we
have
trouble
building
tree
growing
trees
on
open
streets,
how
will
do
it
when
you're
completely
enclosed
by
buildings
is
something
that
perhaps
the
planning
departments
arborist
can
tell
us.
We
are
very
pessimistic
that
they
will
ever
come
back
to
the
30
and
I.
We
are
also
pessimistic
that
there
will
be
access,
free
and
unrestrained
access
to
any
site
and
doubt
what
its
utility
would
be.
L
In
conclusion,
we
support
completely
the
comments
made
by
councilor
McKenney
on
the
need
to
have
something
in
our
corner
of
the
downtown
core
that
would
provide
space
for
a
a
proper
grocer.
The
nearest
is
more
than
15
minute
walk
and
again,
if
we
don't
have
parking
and
we
don't
have
the
buses
that
would
go
directly
there,
we're
really
at
a
loss.
I
do
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
for
the
excellent
comments
you
all
made
on
this
topic.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You,
sir,
just
because
the
idea
of
a
grocery
store
has
come
up.
That's
something
that
really
the
industry
has
to
dictate.
We
can
zone
and
to
make
that
appropriate
use,
but
I
think
having
spent
30
years
in
that
business
I
can
tell
you
would
be
a
very,
very
difficult
marketing
story
to
prove
that
would
give
them
a
reason
to
build
on
that
building.
You.
B
M
Thomas
maguey
from
the
Senate
on
citizens,
Community
Association
staff,
by
the
positive
things
that
we
are
supportive,
a
risk.
We
do
like
to
see
their
development
generally
generally
positive
on
it.
Specifically.
We
have
no
issues
with
the
height
and
what
I
make
sure
that
you're
aware
that
we
were
very
appreciative
that
the
proponents
came
forged
in
community
associations
well
in
advance
and
did
community
consultation
above
us,
and
they
also
did
some
modifications
based
on
the
community
feedback.
So
I'd
like
to
thank
them
for
that.
M
The
only
big
issue
we
have
was
the
green
space
reduction,
not
just
for
the
rest
of
the
community,
but
for
them
as
well
as
we
get
more
residents
in
that
area.
We
also
have
more
more
pets.
We
have
more
need
for
not
just
the
big
open
spaces
like,
but
we
need
spaces
for
dogs
to
pee
people
to
sit
and
relax,
there's
more
need
and
the
reason
that
we
have
that
that
requirement
for
high-rise
residential
of
open
space
is
for
those
needs,
we're
getting
denser
and
denser.
M
Every
time
we
cut
back
on
that
it
gets
more
difficult
and
the
city
does
not
is
not
providing
enough.
Green
space
in
the
downtown
core
and
we
were
not
even
getting
it
from
a
privately
owned
bit
areas
using
that
ability
and
it's
making
it
less
it's
it
comes
down
to
somewhere
for
older
folks
to
sit
and
contemplate
a
green
neck
of
the
woods.
M
M
In
terms
of
making
sure
it's
a
play
on
the
tourism
that
the
needs
of
the
bike,
lane
interaction
is
addressed
and
I'm
sure
that
the
city
staff
are
going
to
do
a
good
job
of
that,
but
we
do
want
to
push
back
on
the
on
the
green
space.
That's
that's
critical.
The
other
comment
that
I'd
like
to
make
is
developments
and
I.
Think
at
some
point
the
city
needs
to
start
doing
studies
instead
of
silos
around
the
PNC.
M
We
had
about
four
towers:
go
in
close
proximity
without
addressing
the
transportation,
the
all
the
infrastructure
as
a
whole
years.
We
didn't
get
a
real
sense
of
the
creative
aspects
of
traffic
studies,
of
pedestrian
studies,
on
that
we're,
seeing
Preston
Street
develop
in
the
same
way,
and
now
we're
seeing
this.
These
clusters
are
happening.
At
the
same
time,
we
don't
have
a
real
good
sense
of
how
to
deal
with
multiple
proponents
coming
forward
at
the
same
time,
so
I
think
that's
something
that
you
know.
M
Maybe
we
should
start
looking
at
as
a
city
so
that
we
have
some
methodologies
so
that
we're
looking
at
them
as
a
whole.
Instead
of
you
know,
150
one
day
having
two
major
towers
on
each
side
of
it,
you
know
facing
on
you
know,
creating
a
lot
of
more
traffic
on
day,
but
we're
not
looking
at
it
holistically.
M
So
that's
the
other
thing
and
in
terms
of
the
commercial
and
you
can
look
at
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
creating
a
spaces
that
will
encourage
I,
think
hardware
stores
and
food
store,
the
two
things,
but
also
smart,
more
boutique
detailed
for
the
area,
as
opposed
to
try
to
bring
people
from
faraway
destination
stores.
So
those
are
my
pants
well.
B
B
We're
talking
at
5
meters,
sidewalk,
which,
which
will
easily
accommodate
trees
and
and
and
manage
them
well,
but
I
think
that
that's
the
kind
of
alert
that
we
could
look
at,
maybe
even
as
a
a
pilot
to
see
how
it
would
work
elsewhere,
I
think
that
would
probably
be
effective.
We
were
talking
about
that
anybody
have
anything
else.
Ok,
so,
on
on
the
item,
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
400
Albert
Street.
Is
it
Kerry
thanks
very
much
and
thank
you
very
much
Don
and
Andrew
for
the
work
that
you've
done.
B
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
this
is
a
follow
up
to
a
direction
that
was
given
by
comedian
counts
or
when
the
zoning
for
traditional
Main
Street
was
brought
forward
in
2014
dealing
specifically
with
Preston
Street
and
the
unique
conditions
that
it
has
so
I.
Think
mr.
mclees
has
a
couple
of
comments
and
Miss
Davis
will
have
a
brief
presentation
and
then
we'll
open
to
any
questions
that
committee
might
have
on
this
item.
E
E
Bylaw
and
part
of
that
package
was
to
look
at
traditional
and
arterial
Main
streets
and
bring
zoning
in
conformity
with
the
direction
of
the
official
plan
with
respect
to
building
heights
and
permitted
uses
in
the
case
of
Preston
Street
between
Somerset
and
Albert
councillor
Holmes
at
the
time
requested
that
this
item
be
pulled
and
that
further
study
be
undertaken
so
file
leave.
Emily
Davies
will
summarize
the
results
of
that
exercise
and
the
recommendations
that
we
have
for
committee
this
morning.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
I
am
Emily
Davies
to
you,
madam
chair
I
will
go
over
the
proposed
recommendations
for
the
Official
Plan
amendment,
as
well
as
the
zoning
bylaw
amendments.
Sorry,
thank
you.
This
is
the
study
area
and
you'll
see
that
the
location
is
adjacent
to
the
baby
station
district
secondary
plan.
That's
identified
on
the
slide
as
area
a
area.
B
is
the
expansion
of
it,
which
is
the
Preston
Street
north
addition.
A
The
study
area
consists
of
Preston
Street
from
Somerset
up
until
Albert
Street.
There
are
four
residential
blocks,
essentially
for
this
section
of
Preston
and
then
over
to
the
city
centre,
Drive
and
as
well
as
Rochester
from
a
secondary
point
perspective.
You'll
note
that
this
is
a
very
small
area
and
that's
why
we're
proposing
to
add
it
to
the
baby
station
district
secondary
plan
I'll
skip
over
the
background
because
they
Lee
just
provided
you
that
information.
A
The
proposed
secondary
plan
recommendation
I
will
just
briefly
go
over.
We
are
proposing
a
number
of
tools
here,
we're
proposing
to
expand
the
boundaries
and
we're
proposing
to
add
four
different
land
use
designations,
you'll,
see
in
the
pink
or
fuchsia
color
that
that
is
going
to
be
a
secondary
plan
or
secondary
traditional
Main
Street
with
a
height
maximum
of
four
storeys.
A
The
area
identified
in
the
blue
is
for
the
northern
tip
of
Preston
at
Albert,
as
well
as
Somerset
Street,
and
that
is
proposed
to
go
to
a
traditional
Main,
Street
designation,
which
is
what
it
currently
is
in.
The
Official
Plan
there's
also
two
pocket
parks
within
the
study
area.
They
are
identified
as
the
hatched
area
on
the
plan,
and
that
is
primrose
park
as
well
as
shoddier
park,
and
the
remaining
area
is
residential.
A
There
are
number
of
Zoning
tools
that
we're
proposing
for
the
section
of
trust
and
identified
on
the
slide.
The
first
zoning
tool
that
we're
proposing
is
to
allow
a
wide
variety
of
those
scale
low-rise
residential
uses.
Currently,
this
area
is
zoned
for
residential,
it's
dr-40
and
our
4-h
zones
so,
and
there's
also
a
number
of
existing
residential
uses
on
the
street,
being
single-family
home
row,
units
and
detached,
and
so
we're
proposing
to
carry
those
forward.
Those
permitted
uses
forward
into
the
new
zoning
by
way
of
a
sub
sown.
A
We've
also
identified
that
there
are
a
number
of
small-scale
row
units
on
Preston
Street.
They
identified
on
this
with
the
pink
bubbles.
These
units
are
very
small
in
nature
and
have
a
unique
floor
plate
we're
proposing
a
number
of
Zoning
tools
for
these
areas,
including
a
maximum
lot
area
that
will
be
capped
at
220
meters,
squared
and
essentially
prohibit
lot.
A
Consolidation
of
these
properties
we're
also
looking
to
put
a
knee
height
suffix
of
fourteen
point,
five
meters,
which
will
cap
the
height
at
four
storeys
for
this
area
and
limit
the
non-residential
uses
significantly
to
personal
service
business
office,
convenience
store
and
retail
store.
I
should
note
that
originally
we
we
went
out
on
circulation
for
this
application
or
for
this
project
we
did
include
retail
food
store
as
a
permitted
use
for
these
role
units.
A
The
last
section
that
I
will
cover
of
the
zoning
tools
that
we've
used
on
the
street
is
there
are
a
number
of
single-family
homes,
as
well
as
semi-detached
homes
that
are
present
on
Bristol
Street,
we're
going
to
fight
on
this
side
within
the
blue
bubbles.
We
are
proposing
that
these
properties
have
a
right
over
idea,
residential
uses
and
I'm,
so
we
are
proposing
that
the
broad
traditional
Main
Street
uses
are
allowed
within
these
properties.
A
A
We
went
out
to
the
public.
With
this
we
reached
out
to
the
public.
We
had
a
public
meeting
on
May
the
10th
we
had
approximately
44
attendees
come
they
provided
a
number
of
input
on
proposed
options
that
we
put
up
to
the
public.
At
that
time
we
circulated
our
proposed
application
or
I
proposed
staff
recommendations
on
September
14.
Can
we
receive
223
written
follow-up
comments.
A
In
conclusion,
we
are
proposing
that
the
section
of
Preston
be
designated
as
a
secondary,
traditional
Main
Street.
This
will
allow
a
variety
of
Zoning
implementation
tours
to
be
used
for
the
area
such
as
limiting
the
permitted
non-residential
uses,
lowering
the
protein
maximum
height
and
protecting
the
thank
you.
B
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
staff.
Thank
you,
Emily
I,
just
you
know
this.
This
was
the
first
thing
that
I
dealt
with
as
a
councillor
just
over
a
year
ago,
walking
in
and
opening
up
the
Official
Plan,
and
you
know
it
it's
interesting
because
we're
this
is
a
part
of
the
city
that
is
under
and
will
continue
to
be
under
very
intense
pressures.
We've
got
the
button
flats
just
further
to
the
north.
The
light
rail
is
running.
You
know,
right
by
Albert,
that
you
know
borders.
K
K
We
have
to
have
people
living
here
as
well,
but
walls
are
getting
to
the
point
where,
in
an
area
like
Preston
Street
people,
you
know
people
are
living
they're
coming
back
into
the
area,
there
yeah
a
lot
of
young
families
in
the
area
and
and
they
want
it
to
be
livable,
they
want
it
to
be
walkable,
they
want
to
be
able
to
psycho
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
shop
and
and
and
live
in
their
community.
So
this
the
outcome
of
this
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
work,
a
lot
of
discussion
with
residents.
K
We
had
two
meetings,
a
very
diverse
kind
of
ideas,
from
residents
about
what
they,
what
they
wanted.
I
worked
closely
with
the
Community
Association
and
staff
and
I
I
do
think
that
we've
arrived
at
a
place
where
the
vision
that
both
you
know
the
neighborhood
residents
have
for
their
street
is
is
reflected
in.
In
this
report.
We
will
have
the
lowest
heighth
restriction
on
any
secondary
traditional
Main
Street
in
the
city.
K
We'll
have
you
know
interesting
community
oriented
businesses
that
promote
walking
and
cycling.
So
it
is,
you
know
it
is
a
balance.
I
believe
that
we
were
able
to
attain
between
you
know
full
commercial
that
was
originally
proposed,
and
this
you
know,
and
a
total
restriction
on
commercial
I
think
we've
we've
come
to
a
place
where
you
know
we
are
going
to
continue
to
to
support
and
protect
the
unique
this
unique
part
of
the
city
and
and
it
will
continue
to
grow
and
develop
in
this
way.
So
thank
you
to
everyone
involved
it.
K
B
Thank
you
well
said
we
do
have
a
question
from
Co,
sir
Nussbaum,
your
passing
okay,
so
thank
you.
Staff
I
mean
I,
recall,
and
it's
well
said
by
Councillor
McKenney
that
when
she
was
first
elected,
this
was
Hot
Tamale
and
people
really
were
upset
and
they
were
I
think
they
were
envisioning
more
of
Preston
South
and
so
I'm
really
glad
that
you
took
the
time
to
work
with
the
community
and
under
account
Katherine's
leadership,
and
but
she
told
me,
she's
told
me
repeatedly
how
fantastic
a
job
that
she
thinks
that
you've
done
so
I.
B
B
You
know
I
PD
for
sure
I'd
like
to
have
more
information,
because
if
you
know
I
mean
you
know,
I've
had
people
actually
very
accusatory
to
myself,
saying
you
know
you're,
just
it's
a
grab
of
money
and
yet
clearly
from
the
moment
that
it
was
even
mentioned.
The
mayor
has
been
very
clear
and
saying
we
didn't
ask
for
this.
This
is
not
our
initiative,
so
I'd
like
to
know
where
it
did
come
from,
and
then
I'd
also
like
to
have
some
kind
of
analysis.