►
From YouTube: Working Group: February 1, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
let's
kick
things
off
so
today
is
the
first
of
the
month,
so
we
are
gonna,
be
doing
or
or
the
first
meeting
of
the
month,
I
should
say
so.
We're
gonna
do
a
roadmap
session
today
to
start
this
meeting
off.
B
A
All
right,
so,
let's
start
off
with
what
we
have
planned,
just
an
update
on
any
of
these
issues
here.
So
as
far
as
I
know,
this
is
in
the
same
state
that
it
exists.
C
A
Has
anyone
here
done
any
thing
related
to
this
kind
of
work
that
they'd
like
to
share?
If
not
that's
fine
I,
don't
think
this
was
I
open
our
list
of
priorities.
A
And
it
doesn't
look
that
way,
so
we
can
move
on
Auto
generate
reference
documentation,
I.
Also,
don't
think
this
has
moved
forward
much
if
at
all
and
yeah
I
don't
know
of
any
updates
here.
So
we
can
move
on
from
this
I
think
as
well.
A
A
And
here
so,
as
far
as
this
is
concerned,
I
think
this
is
done,
I
think,
right
now
we
are
in
the
process
of
buttoning
this
up
just
making
sure
everything
is,
as
it
should
be,
I
think
the
last
things
that
were
on
the
list
were
these
two
items
here
which
Forest
took
care
of
recently,
so
I
think
this
is
actually
complete,
now
save
for
those
last
few
steps
which
is
exciting,
because
this
was
a
pretty
large
chunk
of
work.
A
The
yarn
Berry
work
is
still
on
the
way.
I've
actually
today
finished
the
s-bomb
generation
portion
of
the
yarn,
install
build
pack
and
I
hope
to
have
this
pushed
up
fairly
soon,
it's
been
a
while
and
I'd
like
to
get
this
moving
forward.
So
currently,
this
is
this
first
issue.
A
Here
is
a
work
in
progress
and
once
that's
done
all
right
once
that's
gotten
to
a
reasonable
State,
then
we
might
be
able
to
work
in
parallel
on
the
yarn
start
and
no
run
script
stuff,
but
all
in
all,
I
think
it's
going
well
and
I
forgot
to
start
the
recording
I
think
my.
A
D
A
Cool.
Thank
you
for
that,
and.
A
This
I
think
has
begun
I
think
the
issue
is
that
it
just
hasn't
been
implemented
in
all
the
buildbacks
I
know,
a
bunch
of
folks
went
around
and
and
created
issues
for
this
and
PRS
for
this
on
various
build
packs,
but
I
think
it's
in
varying
states
of
completion,
for
example
here
for
Ruby.
So
there's
a
lot
of
conversation
that
seems
to
be
happening
here
on
the
issue
itself,
but
other
than
this
message
from
three
months
ago.
I'm
not
sure
that
I
have
any
other
context
on
this
particular
issue.
A
A
Any
context
here
and
I,
don't
think
any
of
the
folks
who
do
are
present.
I
think
this
would
be
a
question
probably
for
the
Ruby
maintainers,
both
of
whom
brand
or
all
of
whom
ran
Rob
and
Sophie.
All
right
are
absent
today,
so
we
will
get
updates
on
that.
The
next
time
I
think.
A
And
it
still
seems
like
just
Java
and
rust
remaining
here,
not
sure
I,
think
I
think
we
had
wanted
to
reach
out
to
Dan
on
this
I'm,
not
sure
if
anyone
actually
did
so
I
should
probably
make
a
note
to
follow
up
on
that
again,
and
this
one
seems
to
be
done.
This
is
the
I.
C
A
A
All
right,
I
think
we're
at
the
end
of
the
road
map.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
or
any
comments
on
things
they'd
like
to
see
things
they
didn't
see
here
that
we've
discussed
so
far.
D
Just
a
quick
question:
I
know
that
in
kind
of
like
these
meetings
arm
has
been
discussed
as
like
something
that's
important
and
probably
a
road
map
item,
but
I
don't
see
it
on
the
roadmap.
Is
that
I
mean
like
I
know?
People
are
not
in
the
meeting,
so
I
can't
really
get
an
answer,
but
you
know,
if
that's
going
to
be
added
to
the.
A
Roadmap
I
would
expect
so
I
think
it's
it's
still
something
that's
important
to
us,
I'm,
not
sure
about
the
specific
priority
of
it,
but
I.
Don't
think
it's
just
been
forgotten
about.
If
that's
what
you're
worried
about
I
think
I
would
expect
that
that
work
will
be
done
on
that
at
some
point
soon,
but.
B
D
Yeah
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
do
after
this
call
is
bring
this
up
on
slack.
So
maybe
somebody
can
give
us
an
update,
async.
A
For
sure
yeah
I
mean,
and
it
is,
it
is
helpful
to
to
have
folks
ask
about
it
as
a
just
to
re-integrate
the
conversation
from
time
to
time.
A
All
right,
let
me
so
that
I
think
takes
care
of
what
we'd
like
to
cover
for
the
roadmap.
Let's
go
through
some
outstanding
rfcs,
as
we
usually
do.
I
will
share
again.
A
Like
that
all
right,
let's
start
the
bottom.
C
D
A
A
Does
anyone
here
have
any
context
on
this?
One.
A
And
well
actually,
so
when
was
the
last
comment
here.
C
A
See
what's
up
with
that,
this
is
the
one
we
just
saw.
A
All
right,
February
5th,
so
yeah
so
get
your
comments
and
votes
in
before
February
5th.
Otherwise
this
looks
like
it
will
be
merged
in
pretty
soon.
D
Yeah
Daniel
wanted
to
get
that
previous
one
done
before
we
moved
on
with
this
one,
but
there's
still
some
discussions
going
on
with
this
one
I
think.
A
It
seems
like
okay,
then
commented
very
recently
so
seems
like
the
comments
will
probably
pick
up
here
in
a
little
bit.
Is
there
any
context
you
wanted
to
add,
though,.
C
C
So
then
you
end
up
with
basically
two
things
that
are
trying
to
do
the
same
thing
and
rather
than
duplicating
the
code
between
those
two
things,
we're
looking
to
try
and
make
that
piece
of
Code
common
and
then
drive
it
from
two
different
places.
So
I
don't
expect
there'll
be
too
much
trouble
on
that
one.
It's
it's
just
a
question
of,
and
do
we
want
to
do
this,
and
if
we
want
to
do
this,
then
we'll
we'll
make
it
happen.
A
All
right,
that's
it
for
outstanding
rfcs.
D
Yeah
I
posted
that
I
just
wanted
to
make
Everybody
aware
that
there's
a
mentoring
project
where,
like
arms
arm
support
and
multi-art
support,
is
going
to
get
looked
at
and
worked
on
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
picketta.
You
know
Community
aware
of.
D
A
Got
you
does
anyone
else,
have
any
CNB
updates
or
questions
before
we
move
into
the
project?
Update
and
opening
up
the
floor.
A
All
right,
there's
a
new
blog
post
by
ran
detailing
the
2023
roadmap,
which
arm
64
is
at
the
top
of
so
hopefully
that
at
least
some
of
folks
fears.
C
Sure
I
mean
I'm
just
again
aware
at
the
moment,
starting
to
write
up
the
RFC
for
the
Ubi
images
are
started,
a
discussion
over
in
the
discussion
forum
the
other
week,
if
you're
interested
in
Ubi
images,
if
you've
got
thoughts,
if
you
care
about
what
we're
doing
here,
I
would
love
to
have
your
input
now,
because
then
I
can
write
that
into
the
RFC
as
I'm,
putting
it
together,
otherwise
we'll
be
having
the
same
discussion
as
we
get
through
the
RFC
review
stage
so
yeah
if
you've
got
thoughts,
I've
written
up
roughly,
where
I
think
I'm
going
with
it
looks
like
Rob's
already
replied
and
I've
replied
to
him
so
I'm,
just
after
any
other
feedback,
any
other
input
that
you've
got
for
Ubi
images,
please
Pile
in
on
the
discussion
thread.
C
D
Quick
question
I'm
going
to
read
that
that's
very
helpful.
The
so
is
this
something
where,
like
red
Hat's
going
to
be
publishing
and
maintaining
them,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
paquetto
image.
C
C
There
is
the
possibility,
moving
forwards
that
that
then
may
become
an
upstream
for
a
red
hat
commercial
supplied
offering,
but
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
secondary
thing
here.
You
know.
The
main
thing
is
that
we're
looking
to
make
this
work
within
the
keto
that
that's
the
goal.
What
what
happens
after
that
is
product
management,
which
is
not
my
department,
cool,
that's
good,.
A
Anyone
else
have
any
topics
they'd
like
to
get
into
here.
In
this
section.
B
Maybe
quick
update
on
my
efforts
of
getting
rid
of
deprecated
GitHub
actions
features
so
with
merging
this
to
the
the
pipeline
Builder
from
the
Java
team,
I
guess
I'm
positive
that
we
will
make
it
before
the
features
are
disabled
in
May.
So
there
are
a
few
custom
GitHub
action
files
left
in
in
a
few
repos
like
the
applicator
website.
B
B
In
case
you
see
some
warning
somewhere
that
that
deprecated
features
used
in
a
GitHub
action
run
yeah,
just
maybe
you
can
can
send
it
around
to
me
that
I
can
have
a
look
there
and
also
update
this
yeah
in
case
I
missed
something
I
know
that
there
are
still
some
left,
but
yeah
yeah.
You
see
that
just
adds
up
to
me.
B
So
in,
if
you
use
this
in
the
GitHub
action,
this
deprecated
syntax,
it
will
generate
a
warning
in
the
action.
So
you
will
see
that
in
the
locks
that,
like
some
yellow
box,
can
think
that
using
deprecated
feature
there
and
yeah.
If
you
see
that,
then
I
am
not
done
yet,
but
with
all
repos.
So
we'll
continue
on
Friday
that
topic,
but
yeah
most
of
the
repos
should
be
done
and
if
you
see
something,
maybe
give
me
a
quick
heads
up
and
have
a
look
at
it.
A
Anything
top
of
mind
for
folks.
If
not,
then
I
can
give
you
some
time
back,
but
just
want
to
leave
a
couple
more
seconds
open
for
anyone
to
voice
anything.
They
had.
A
All
right
cool
doesn't
sound
like
there's
anything
else
to
get
into
right
now,
so
I
think
we
can
call
it
there
for
today,
I
apologize
I
did
not
have
too
much
context
for
some
of
the
the
things
we
looked
over
in
the
roadmap
today,
but
hope
to
see
you
guys
next
time
and
hope
you
all
enjoyed
today.