►
From YouTube: Working Group: 2022-05-17
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Let
me
share
my
screen
here,
so
let's
get
started
again,
feel
free
to
add
yourself
to
that
in
this
list
and
also
include
your
affiliation.
A
C
We're
looking
at
the
same
thing
or
maybe
you're,
it's
not
updating
on
your
ends,
david.
Oh
there
we
go
it
just
updated
for
you.
It
was
a
little
slow.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Any
new
faces
is
well
not
much,
not
exactly
all
right.
Okay,
first
thing
review
outstanding
rfcs.
First
one
will
be
the
health
checker
build
pack.
D
You
know
there
is
yeah,
I
I
did
some
updates
on
that
one
and
pushed
a
couple
changes.
So
if
folks
are
interested
just
to
take
another
look.
E
I
spoke
to
a
forest
about
this
earlier
in
the
week
and
I
think
he
said
that
if
there
are
no
objections
to
the
latest
on
the
rfc
that
he
was
going
to
potentially
push
to
have
this
merged
in
by
the
end
of
the
week,
so
essentially
take
a
look
if
anybody's
interested
and
see.
If
you
want
to
leave
any
more
comments.
Otherwise
it
may
be
merged
in
as
it
is.
B
Yeah
no
updates
on
this.
As
far
as
I
can
tell
you,
I
don't
think
there
have
been
any
new
comments,
still
looking
for
feedback.
If
anyone
has
strong
opinions
about
the
javascript
ecosystem
and
yarn
specifically.
B
I
guess
it's
maybe
worth
pointing
out
as
well
that
as
the
only
other
node
maintainer
since
while
ran
is
out.
This
will
probably
just
be
here,
which
is
fine.
A
F
Yeah,
so
this
is
just
like
a
tiny
amendment
to
what
was
actually
implemented
in
an
old.net
rfc.
We
ran
into
some
implementation
issues
with
the
initial
proposal,
so
it's
just
a
small
edit.
That
brings
the
rfc
in
line
with
what
was
done.
A
No
okay:
let's
go
ahead:
cool,
okay
next
one
another
new
rfc
that
proposes
to
boost
rfc
47.
A
Okay,
yeah
all
right
seems
like
that's
it
so
far
in
terms
of
rfcs,
unless
you
have
any
other
update
around
this.
C
Yeah
one
of
the
rfcs
that
would
be
good
to
start
soon,
at
least
the
initial
bones
of
it
would
be
for
the
ubi.
C
So
I
know
ryan's
out
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
but
I
yeah
ozzy.
I
was
looking
at
a
previous
skull
and
you
you
were
interested
in
it.
I
I
don't
know
if
you'd
be
interested
in
like
trying
out,
I
guess
some
of
the
basics
of
of
the
rfc
for
what
it
looks
like
repo
names,
we're
thinking
ubia.
But
if
any
anything
else
comes
to
mind
about
what
you
think
it
would
look
like
and
we
could
based
off
say
the
jamie
stack
rfc.
C
But
I
was
just
wondering
your
your
thoughts
on
that.
G
No
yeah
yeah,
I'm
interested
in
that
one,
so
I
would
guess
at
ubi
8
as
well,
because
that's
the
the
better
one
and
it's
the
question
is
which
ubi8?
Because
there
are
many
you
know,
ubi8
minimal
is
a
great
place
to
start,
if
you're
not
sure.
But
then
there
are
like
uv
i8
ones
that
are
distributions
for
different
run
times
as
well.
E
Cool
yeah,
I
think,
as
a
stax
maintainer,
with
very
little
knowledge
of
uvi
it'd,
be
really
helpful
to
just
like
have
an
rfc
in
general
that
enumerates
some
of
those
different
options
that
you're
just
talking
about,
because
I
just
really
don't
have
that
much
context
about
them.
At.
G
All
yeah,
I
mean
it's
easy
enough
on
a
top
level.
It's
basically
just
not
an
ubuntu
based
distribution.
It's
a
you
know,
one
that
uses
dnf
and
rpm
for
its
installs.
Good
news
is
so
far,
at
least
on
the
testing
I've
been
doing.
I
haven't
had
any
issues
running
the
rest
of
the
build
packs
on
the
ubia
base
images
yeah,
because
there
would
be
the
off
chance
that
say.
G
Urban
2
had
a
version
of
grep
that
had
a
particular
flag
that
some
bill
pack
relied
on
somewhere
if
it
was
using
bash
that
wouldn't
work
if
it
had
a
different
version
of
grep
from
the
ubuntu
from
the
ubi
base
image.
But
you
know
the
beginner
stuff's.
All
in
goes
that's
fairly
constant
when
it
runs
across.
So
that's
good.
A
Okay,
next
up
in
the
agenda
will
be
cnb
updates.
Some
questions
so
far.
Well,
a
big
one.
Some
governance
changes
in
the
project
yeah
summer
is
basically
they're.
Establishing
a
technical
oversight
committee
and
having
lead
leads
for
four
different
teams.
Probably
they.
H
A
So
that's
that's
one
update
that
I
can
see.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
comment
around
this
or
any
other
cnv
update
that
you're
aware
of.
D
D
A
Great
cool
any
other
update
world
project
update
you
like
to
share
here.