►
From YouTube: Working Group: 2022-12-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hey
there
folks
David
could
not
make
it
today
so
I
think
I
will
facilitate
this
meeting
nice
to
see
you
all
here.
A
I
guess
maybe
I'll
give
books
a
minute
or
so
more
to
to
pop
in
but
remember
to
sign
up
on
the
attendees
list.
In
the
meantime,
I've
posted
the
link
in
chat
and
then
we
can
get
started.
A
A
First
of
all,
is
there
anyone
who
would
be
open
to
taking
notes
for
this
meeting?
A
Awesome
I
don't
think
there
are
any
new
faces
today.
I've
seen
all
these
faces
before,
so
we
can
skip
past
that
do
folks
need
me
to
share
my
screen.
Would
that
be
easier?
Yeah.
A
A
Cool,
so
let's
dive
into
outstanding
rfcs.
A
What
was
the
okay,
so
it
looks
like
this
is
all
good
to
go.
Then
so
I
guess
not
much
to
say
on
this
one.
B
I'm
sorry,
it
went
Fair
Brian
who's
on
vacation
right
now
to
Magic
when
he
gets
back
and
I
didn't
want
to
do
it
because
I
wanted
to
give
him
a
chance
to
like
make
any
like
changes
to
the
file
name
or
any
last
minute.
Changes
that
don't
need
approvals
before
merging.
But
it's
good
to
go.
A
C
A
All
right
excuse
me
require
a
specific
Java
version
in
the
build
plan.
Is
there
anyone
here
who
knows
the
details
about
this.
A
David,
isn't
here,
but
Robert
see
you've
left
a
comment
here:
yeah.
B
That's
my
read
of
the
RFC,
but
obviously
I,
don't
know,
except
my
chance
to
chat
with
David
this
eleven
yeah.
So
we'll
probably
have
to
pick
this
one
back
up
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
B
A
B
Just
maybe
to
add
one
of
the
piece
on
that
one
I
think
this
would
be
an
opportunity
to
like
maybe
identify
ways
to
unify
the
build
pack
like
workflow,
and
maybe
the
one
thing
I
would
like
to
see
is:
can
we
bring
the
the
Java
and
the
non-java
build
pack
workflows,
closer
together
and
and
I
think
there's
a
risk
for
this
RFC
that
we
might
actually
make
them
go
further
apart
and
that's
something
I'd
like
to
avoid,
if
possible,
I
think
it'll
be
easier
for
everyone
to
maintain
if
they
look
similar
so
but
like
I,
said
I
just
kind
of
read
this
this
morning,
and
maybe
it's
not
here
to
share
his
thoughts.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
great
point
we'll
get
back
to
that.
Then
that's
it
for
outstanding
rxcs.
A
Has
anyone
got
any
CNB
updates?
Another
questions
for
the
Upstream.
A
All
right
cool
as
far
as
project
updates
I,
don't
think
that
there's
anything
too
huge
since
the
last
time
we've
met.
Is
there
anything
I'm
missing
anyone
knows
of
last
week
was
or
last
time
we
met
was
the
PHP
buildback
version
2
and
the
roadmap
I,
don't
think
with
anything
major
since
then.
So
all
right,
cool
and
I
see
one
discussion
topic
here.
So
we
can
dive
into
that
thoughts
about
webassembly
and
build
packs.
C
Hey
this
is
Ram,
so
I
put
that
one
in
I've
been
seeing
some
notes
and
other
comments
peppered
here
and
there
about
you
know
webassembly,
you
know
possibly
being
able
to
work
with
build
packs
or
build
packs
being
able
to
export
something
that
works
potentially
with
some
basm-based
immutable
artifact.
C
B
I,
don't
have
any
specific,
like
awareness
of
webassembly,
but
my
initial
sort
of
high
level
answer
is
that,
like
the
Bell
pack,
spec
spits
out
oci
images,
so
the
the
only
way
I
could
imagine
that
we
would
be
able
to
deliver
a
webassembly
compatible
like
application,
would
be
within
the
framework
of
like
a
server-side
app
running
as
an
oci
image.
That
then
provides
a
web
assembly
that
can
run
on
the
client
side.
A
Yeah
I'm
also
not
off
the
top
of
my
head
super
familiar
with,
like
the
workflow
that
I
wouldn't
tell
you're
you're
about
to
say
something
up.
B
B
Of
like
more
generally,
as
we
kind
of
alluded
to,
there's
a
roadmap
for
2023,
so
that'd
be
a
great
like
conversation
topic
to
put
on
there.
You'll
get
more
eyes
on
it
than
you
will
from
just
this.
One
meeting
and
it'll
give
us
an
opportunity.
Asynchronously.
C
Yeah
I
this
morning,
I
did
consider
dropping
it
in
there,
but
because
I
saw
the
working
group
meeting
I
thought.
Maybe
I
can
have
a
word
with
folks
before
doing
that,
but
thanks
Rob
I'll
definitely
add
it
there
with
like
and
padded
with
a
little
more
context
and
some
relevant
links
to
like
other
stuff
that
have
been
seen
thanks.
A
All
right
sounds
good.
Was
there
anything
else,
photons
chat
about
either
on
that
topic
or
something
else.
A
All
right:
well,
if
there's
nothing
else,
I
think
that
might
be
it
for
this
meeting.
I'm,
not
sure
that
we'll
see
each
other
again
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
So
exactly
yeah,
so
I'll
see
you
all
next
year,
then
and
yeah
enjoy
the
holidays.