►
From YouTube: Working Group: 2022-06-28
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
welcome
everyone,
the
picado
working
group
meeting,
I'm
glad
to
see
you
here
share
my
screen
and
we'll
get
started,
sharing
again
the
link
for
the
notes
and
the
agenda
in
case
you
don't
have
it
empty
all
right
again
feel
free
yourself
to
that
in
this
list,
including
your
affiliation,
especially
if
it's
not
vmware.
A
Okay
for
this
session
is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
be
a
note
taker.
A
Oh
all
right
yeah
seems,
like
you
know,
new
spaces,
okay
great.
So,
let's
get
started
with
the
outstanding
rfcs.
There
are
some
rfcs
here
and
a
couple
of
new
rfcs.
A
C
D
D
A
C
E
I
I
missed
the
notification
a
couple
days
ago
that
this
has
two
approvers
now,
so
it
can
be
merged
and
I'll
do
that.
B
B
So
we're
looking
for
you
know
just
any
of
the
open
comments
to
be
addressed.
I
think
I've
responded
to
all
of
them
or
josh
has,
and
then
I
think
that
there
was
also
some
outstanding
questions
for
dan
regarding
how
java
does
dependencies
and
if
we'll
be
able
to
reconcile
the
differences
between
java
and
non-java,
build
packs
with
this
plan.
B
So
if
you
could
take
a
look
at
this,
sometimes
in
another,
we
can
sync
up
about
it
at
the
working
group
or
you
know
you
just
leave
comments
whatever
it
works,
but
I
think
that's
a
good
key
piece
of
information
that
we're
missing
from
here
as
to
where
whether
this
will
work
for
all
of
the
build
packs
or
not.
B
No
worries
these
are
pretty
hefty.
I
mean
there's
four
of
them
so
happy
to
cut
through
them.
I
also
am
planning
to
do
a
little
walkthrough
of
stuff
just
for
the
core
team,
because
I
realize
rfcs
are
like
a
little
chunky,
so
I
can
also
add
you
to
that
and
can
go
through
stuff
if
it's
just
more
of
a
time.
Saver.
C
The
reason
I
think
we
should
have
that
conversation
is
both
because
we're
trying
to
move
everything
to
be
more
consistent
across
the
project.
So,
if
we're
approving
a
new
thing,
I
think
we
should
definitely
personally,
we
can
roll
out
for
all
the
build
packs,
not
everything
but
java,
but
also,
I
think
the
java
build
pack
sort
of
like
conceptualizes
this
differently,
where
you
start
sort
of
by
you
know
like
pr
in
depths
directly
into
bill
pecktomel,
and
then
the
jobs
update
them
rather
than
like,
adding,
rather
than
thinking
about
it
as
adding
or
removing.
A
All
right
any
other
comment
around
the
dependency
management:
rss,
no,
okay,
next
up
new
rfc,
the
new
feature
checklist
rfc,
this
one
by
forrest.
A
You
already
have
some
comments
here
but
wondering
if
someone
wants
to
discuss
anything
around
the
proposal.
C
What's
in
the
middle
of
a
review
on
this
one-
and
I
guess
when
forrest
is
back,
I
sort
of
wanted
to
talk
about
the
different
personas
here
I
feel
like
as
a
checklist.
I
don't
know
if
in
lots
of
situations,
we're
talking
about
like
external
contributors
or
new
contributors,
we'd
really
be
expecting
those
people
to
take
responsibility
for
all
the
items
in
the
checklist.
C
A
C
No,
I
think
all
these
comments
are
basically
saying
the
same
thing,
which
is
we
should
figure
out
how
to
make
the
fact
that
this
is
deprecated
clear
to
folks
for
a
window
before
we
rip
it
out.
F
Yeah
so
since
ryan
is
out,
I'm
kind
of
like
the
proxy
representing
this
rfc
today,
it's
pretty
short
and
sweet.
If
you
pull
up
that
for
a
second
yeah,
so
it
kind
of
extends
the
earlier
rfc
that
talks
generally
about
how
we
want
to
do
remote
debugging
in
the
project.
That's
the
rfc,
that's
linked
there
in
the
proposal.
Section
number
37.
F
in
this
case,
I
guess
like
the
interesting
thing
to
understand-
is
that
we're
going
to
be
installing
the
visual
studio,
debugger
tool
as
part
of
some
build
plans,
and
that,
like
additional
tool,
will
be
like
executable
by
the
process
that
wants
to
attach
to
it.
So
if
you're
curious
about
how
this
stuff
works,
you
can
read
the
source,
material
or
prior
art,
that's
in
the
bottom
of
the
rfc.
That,
like
explains
the
documentation
or
like
it's
user
and
community,
generated
docs
on
how
to
make
this
work.
A
A
Okay,
so
seems
like
that's
it
in
terms
of
rfc.
Unless
you
have
something
additional,
so
we
will
move
to
the
next
item
in
the
updates
in
question
yeah.
The
only
update
that
I
was
able
to
find
last
week
was
the
new
pack
release
a
couple
of
changes
there,
but
seems
like
it's
not
too
much
and
yes
ryan
said
previously,
since,
like
all
releases
are
better
releases
there,
so
yeah
just
to
mention
a
new
pack
relief.