►
From YouTube: Paketo
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
it's
four
minutes
in
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
I'll
share
my
screen:
do
we
have
any
new
faces
today?
It
doesn't
look
like
it
to
me,
but.
A
I'll,
throw
it
out
there.
No
all
right,
designated
Note
Taker
can
I
get
a
designated
Note
Taker
for
today.
A
Perfect,
let's
take
a
look
at
outstanding
rfcs
and
for
my
money
there
appears
to
only
be
one.
So,
let's
take
a
quick
look
at
that
one
and
through
it,
I
believe
that
this
is
yours.
Kevin
around
additional
jvms
for
the
Java
build
pack
yeah
we've
had.
C
Some
discussions
last
week
and
yesterday
or
yeah
Daniel
approved
it
I,
don't
know
what
other
approvals
we
need.
A
That's
probably
all
you
need
it
might
make
sense
for
David
O'sullivan
to
take
a
look
at
this
as
well,
but
I
think
that
this
could
probably
go
into
like
final
comment
period.
If
we
wanted
to
I'll
reach
out
I'll
reach
out
to
Dan
about
that,
maybe
he
wants
David
to
take
a
look
at
it,
but
yeah
I
can
reach
out
to
Dan
for
that
all
right,
thanks
of
course,
yeah
no
problem,
and
with
that
this
is
a.
A
This
is
just
a
and
a
PR
to
update
the
accepted
list
in
the
readme.
So
I,
don't
think
that
we
actually
need
to
discuss
that.
So
with
that
I
think
that
we're
actually
already
it's
a
top
slash
bottom
of
our
RFC
list.
So
we
can
move
on
to
CNB
updates
and
questions.
A
I
think
the
only
big
CMB
update
that
I
have
is
for
this
working
group
is
their
continued
move
towards
the
removal
of
stacks.
If
that's
not
something
that
you've
looked
into,
it
should
probably
be
something
that
you
look
into.
I
think
it's
something
that
we've
kind
of
wanted
for
a
while,
because
the
stack
IDs
were
not
as
descriptive
or
perhaps
maybe
a
bit
too
descriptive
for
what
we
wanted
in
terms
of
support.
So
This
should
hopefully
be
in
step
in
the
right
direction.
A
A
A
Are
there
any
project
updates
that
I'm
not
aware
of.
A
All
right,
finally,
we
have
two
Open
Mic
questions,
so
the
first
one
being
the
kettle
build
packs
workshop
at
Devcon,
I
assume
that's
czechia.
D
Yeah,
it
is
so
I
just
got
word
yesterday
that
a
proposal
for
a
build
packs
Workshop
has
been
accepted
at
Dev
conf,
that's
scheduled
to
happen
in
mid-june,
so
I,
if
all
the
logistics
in
terms
of
visas
and
other
things
do
line
up
for
me,
I
will
be
presenting
at
the
conference.
D
I
wanted
to
find
out
if
there'd
be
takers
for
coming
and
presenting
there.
That
would
be
cool,
but
if
not,
you
know
any
help
in
terms
of
prepping.
For
that
workshop
and
helping
with
like
80
minutes
worth
of
content.
In
terms
of
you
know,
these
are
the
steps
and
stages
that
we
can
walk.
D
Folks
through
I'd
be
happy
to
get
all
kinds
of
help
on
that,
because
by
myself,
I
think
I
can
manage
about
40
minutes
of
fish,
definitely
not
80.,
so
anything
that
the
community
can
do
to
sort
of
help
and
provide
in
terms
of
any
content,
any
any
ideas
about
what
to
show
what
not
to
show
and
things
like
that
is
much
appreciated.
A
That's
that's
awesome.
I
would
maybe
suggest
opening
some
sort
of
discussion
topic.
E
E
B
Are
you
looking
for
somebody
to
present
with
you
or
to
like,
take
the
presentation
and
do
it
themselves
if
they're
interested
and
then
also
relatedly,
would
that
be
in
person
or
is
they?
Is
there
a
virtual
component
to
this
yeah.
D
So,
unfortunately,
there's
no
virtual
component,
because
this
is
like
a
workshop
track.
It
has
to
be
I,
think
something
more
interactive
in
terms
of
we
have
to
get
participants
to
take
particular
steps
in
terms
of
like
it'll,
be
like
a
tutorial.
Only
it'll
be
life
is,
is
my
guess
so
at
the
moment,
I
applied
as
an
individual,
but
I
think
there's
always
ways
in
which
we
can
get
organizers.
D
To
add
other
speakers
who
who
can
come
and
and
present
so
but
yeah
I
get
that
it
can
be
a
tough
ask.
It's
scheduled
to
be
in
mid-june,
so
I
think
the
weekend
of
the
18th
or
something.
A
E
A
Best
I
could
say
is
that
probably
some
sort
of
one
of
my
friends
it'll
come
back
to
me.
Some
sort
of
a
discussion
topic
to
crowdsource
some
ideas
would
probably
be
good
and
then
I
believe
that
we've
done
some
forms
of
like
like
demos
and
workshops
in
the
past,
I
believe
that
a
long
time
ago,
Ryan
and
Andy
did
a
like
Docker
to
build
pack
Workshop
I'm,
not
saying
that.
A
That's
necessarily
what
you
would
want
to
do,
but
there
may
be
some
interesting
ideas
in
there
and
they
spend
a
lot
of
time
sort
of
working
out.
The
interaction
in
some
of
the
Kinks,
so
I
can
I
can
ask
Ryan
about
that
and.
D
Sure
that
would
be
one
of
the
most
logical
steps
to
take
right.
So
if
you're
using
Docker
and
containerizing
some
stuff
right
now,
you
know
try
to
do
a
pack
build
on
like
the
same
code
base
and
we'll
figure
out
things
as
we
go.
D
So
if
we
can
I
think
the
we
could
start
with
like
a
sample
or
two
that
we
have
and
then
showcase
progressively
showcase,
slightly
more
complex,
apps
and
towards
the
NCAA
folks
are
able
to
apply
it
on
their
own
code
basis
and
see
what
sticks
and
what
doesn't
so.
D
Yeah
so
I
had
requested
it
in
the
same
group
and
posted
like
a
few
times.
So
thank
you
Forrest
for
coming
forward
to
do
that
interview.
So
this
is
about
the
session
about
security
and
compliance.
So
we
need
to
send
them
a
few
seed
questions
so
like
some
basic
stuff
about
what
we'd,
like
the
conversation
to
include
or
what
would
make
sense
in
terms
of
a
start-
and
these
are
like
one
or
two
questions
that
you
could
ask-
and
this
should
be
the
conclusion
and
stuff
like
that.
D
A
Like
strengths
and
that
sort
of
thing
I
can
send
that
document
to
you,
I've
and
yeah
I
was
I,
was
hoping
to
put
together
like
that,
probably
today
or
tomorrow,
and
send
that
over
just
so
that
they
have
plenty
of
time.
A
Sure
and
then
finally,
we
have
thoughts
on
updating
CI
to
create
multi-arc,
build
packs,
AMD,
60
arm
64
and
AMD
64.
C
That
was
me
hello,
so
I
haven't
been
here
for
a
little
while
I've
been
working
on
a
mentorship
project
with
the
pack
Upstream
pack
project-
and
you
know
the
stack
removal
part
is
kind
of
complicated.
Obviously
so,
there's
a
lot
of
moving
pieces
there,
but
the
first
step
that
they're
going
to
take
towards
multi-arch
is
basically
allowing
pack
to
create
manifest,
and
that
means
that
you
know
Creator
build
pack
creators.
C
Authors
would
just
need
to
use
this
tooling
to
actually
create
multi-arch
images,
and
we
can
kind
of
do
that
today,
already
with
docker
or
podman
or
whatever
choice
you
want
to
use
like
it
can
be
done
today
and
I
think
that
it
there's
a
lot
of
value
in
updating
the
CI
to
create
multi-arch,
build
packs
today
and
then,
once
all
this
stuff
gets
worked
out
on
the
you
know,
Upstream
part
of
it,
then
we
can
update
the
CI
so
that
or
you
can
update
the
CI
so
that
it's
using
the
new
standard,
but
it's
hard
to
actually
test
anything
when
you
only
have
AMD
64
build
packs
available,
and
you
know
I'd
like
to
do
that.
C
I'd
like
to
have
you
know,
users
test:
it
have
a
lot
of
interest
in
otrs,
build
packs,
but
I
haven't
said:
let's
use
them
because
I
would
have
to
go
and
basically
rebuild
everything
that
paquetto
is
doing
myself
and
publish
multi-arch
images
to
my
own
registry
somewhere
and
I.
Don't
want
to
do
that
so
I'm
I'm
floating
the
idea
of
are
you?
Are
you
open
for
an
RFC
or
something
so
that
we
can
update
the
CI
and
start
creating
multi-arch
Builders
today?
A
I
mean
certainly
I,
don't
know
that
an
RFC
would
go
a
mess.
I
think
some
of
the
our
biggest
reasons
for
not
doing
it
in
the
past
was
availability
of
workers
like
so
we're
using
GitHub
actions
and
I
know
that
they're
still
on
AMD,
64.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
still
true,
because
I
haven't
looked
at
the
worker
pool
lately
and
it
would
seem
to
make
sense
for
them
to
probably
have
some
arm
workers
at
some
point
in
the
not
too
distant
future.
C
A
Yeah
I
I.
Yes,
that
is
true,
I
think.
The
only
thing
that
we'd
be
concerned
about
is
that
we
would
lose
the
ability
to
test
them
on
Native
emphasis
like
like
infrastructure
like
we'd,
lose
the
infrastructure
testing
for
arm
and
I.
Think
that
that's
probably
what
would
be
the
biggest
concern
I
think
if
we
were
to
do
something
like
put
them
out
experimentally
in
some
ways
like
we've,
you
know
we've
crossed
compiled
to
arm
and
go
so
that
you
can
do
this.
A
That's
maybe
a
different
conversation,
but
talking
about
full-fledged
support
without
the
ability
to
test
against
that
architecture
might
be
a
bit
a
bit
harder
to
convince
at
least
myself
of
just
because
you
know
you
you
get
it.
You
get
into
situations
where,
like
I,
haven't
validated
that
this
artifact,
that
I've
built
in
a
different
way
is
actually
as
valid
as
the
one
that
I
have
tested.
E
C
Well,
yeah
I
mean
the
the
testing
part
I,
guess
I
hadn't
really
considered
that
part.
Okay
still
I
think
that
maybe
like
what
what
can
I
do
to
help
move
this
conversation
forward
because
I
think
it's
it
just
needs
to
happen
and
I
know
in
the
road
map.
This
was
like
a
big
thing,
but
I
had
looked
at
the
road
map.
I
didn't
see
anything
on
there
for
it.
A
B
Yeah
I
know
that
recently
Dan
makuza,
like
has
renewed
his
interest
in
like
getting
the
ball
rolling
on
this
as
well.
B
He
was
looking
into
like
actually
like
starting
up
an
initiative
in
this
area
to
work
on
it.
I
haven't
really
been
following
the
latest
of
what
he's
been
working
on
there,
but
I
do
think.
First
of
all
on
RFC
would
be
great
like
even
if
you
just
start
off
with
like
a
very
basic
thing.
Then
at
least
we
have
a
forum
for
people
to
like
weigh
in
with
their
concerns
and
things
you
don't
have
to
have
like
the
whole
thing.
B
Because
yeah
without
a
doubt
like
this,
is
a
road
map
item
or
like
something
that
the
project
has
been
wanting
to
do,
but
it
just
like
hasn't
been.
We
haven't,
found
the
time
still
to
like
actually
get
on
with
it
and
start
looking
into
this.
So
any
way
that
you
can
like
get
the
ball
rolling
would
be
very
much
appreciated.
E
Yeah
I'll
just
go
a
quick
question
to
ask
so
the
RFC,
the
for
the
UPI
stuff,
got
accepted
and
everything
just
before
Easter
who
do
I
chase
about
the
repositories,
because
we're
waiting
on
the
repositories
to
be
created
for
that.
So
we
can
start
putting
code
in.
A
Those
repositories
are
supposed
to
be
created
in
poqueto.
Community
are
correct,
yes,
indeed,
I
can
probably
spin
those
up
for
you
right
after
this
meeting.