►
From YouTube: Community Development Call 3/30/22
Description
Join Regen Network for the latest updates from our team, including blockchain development, science development, registry and go to market progress. After a 15 min update presentation we open the field for questions and engagement from our community of open source developers.
Connect with our community 👇
• Website: https://regen.network
• Twitter: https://wwwtwitter.com/regen_network
• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/weareregennetwork/
• Telegram: https://t.me/regennetwork_public
• Medium: https://medium.com/regen-network
• GitHub: https://github.com/regen-network/
• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/regen-network/
• Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/regen_network/
A
Welcome
to
the
region,
community
update,
call,
there's
a
few
folks
will
be
passing
things
back
and
forth.
Yeah
lots
of
exciting
news.
It's
been
a
really
big
couple
of
weeks.
We
have
a
taken,
the
next
step
in
interchain
carbon,
there's,
a
bunch
of
active
governance
or
forum
posts
about
potential
governance
proposals.
There's
a
governance
proposal
right
now
live
on
chain,
there's
a
huge
amount
of
work
being
done
on
multiple
different
levels
between
the
foundation,
r
d,
inc
and
community
members.
A
So
we'll
do
our
best
to
sum
that
all
up,
I'm
sure,
as
always,
we'll
miss
a
few
things.
Hopefully
some
of
the
people
here
on
the
call
can
fill
things
in
that
dan
and
I
missed,
as
we
were
prepping
and
will
as
well
as
we
were
prepping
today's
slideshow.
So
with
that
said,
oh,
and
also
as
always,
we
try
to
keep
ourselves
to
the
impossible
bar
of
getting
all
the
news
out
in
15
minutes
so
that
we
can
talk
about
stuff
for
another
15
minutes.
A
The
last
time
that
that
happened
was
never
but
we'll
keep
trying.
No
all
right
good
to
see
you
paul
and
will
good
to
see
you
guys
all
right.
Let's
go,
let's
see
see
what
we
can
do
here.
Everybody
keep
it
snappy,
all
right,
so
josh.
Why
don't
you
take
this
one.
B
B
We
have
essentially
a
number
of
land
stewards
and
methodology
developers
in
the
room,
as
well
as
potential
community
facilitators
and
added
capacity
bubbling
up
in
that
room.
The
topics,
governance,
community,
building
and
discord
channels.
You
can
get
it
on
regen
foundation,
but
I'm
also
available
on
twitter.
These
days
get
more
active
in
that
space.
B
A
Happening
every
wednesday
and
yeah,
I
imagine
you
may
split
out
into
different
working
groups
as
it
as
people
sort
of
need,
great
so
wednesday
in
discord,
josh
and
the
foundation
folks
are
hosting
calls
to
to
dig
into
stuff.
A
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
brief
shout
out
to
the
registry
and
science
team
they've
been
doing
a
huge
amount
of
work
to
migrate,
the
region
registry
program
into
get
book,
and
essentially
this
is
the
next
step
to
creating
a
modular
community
governed
program
guide
and
set
of
standards
for
regen
registry,
and
so
it's
super
exciting
for
folks
who
aren't
familiar
with
get
technology.
A
It's
pretty
cool
just
as
a
part
of
the
larger
decentralized
movement
and
software
engineering
stuff.
But
having
this
get
book
around
the
registry
is
is
quite
exciting.
People
can
go
and
tour
around
library.region.network.
A
I'm
sure
we'll
get
the
registry
and
science
team
to
do
a
deeper
dive
into
this
at
some
point.
But
just
so
folks
know
this
is
this
is
out
there
and
it's
moving
and
it's
going
to
just
be
getting
updated
more
and
more
every
week.
A
C
Hey
everyone.
So
last
year
the
foundation
launched
this
program
that,
while
we're
in
the
process
of
distributing
these
community
staking
dow
tokens
that
they,
the
kind
of
outstanding
tokens
should
be
delegated
to
validators
and
that
they
should
build
network
security
and
validator
economics,
and
we
ran
the
first
version
of
that
program.
Delegating
25
million
tokens
through
to
its
completion.
And
at
this
point
we
have
these
25
million
tokens
that
are
staked
and
it's
time
to
improve
the
algorithm
that
we
utilize
and
the
the
main
that
there
there's
been
a
lengthy
discord.
C
I
I
mean
a
lengthy
commonwealth
discussion
about
this
and
that
that
everybody
agrees
there
should
be
some
kind
of
governance
metric,
that's
integrated,
so
the
foundation's,
putting
out
a
an
rfp
looking
for
validators.
That
would
like
to
work
with
us
on
implementing
a
program
that
that
would
upgrade
how
we
manage
these
assets.
C
So
all
the
details
are
at
the
link
here
and
also
on
commonwealth,
and
please
make
some
submissions
over
the
next
couple
weeks
and
the
work
would
be
paid
for
through
a
delegation
from
the
foundation
and
it's
up
to
the
people,
creating
submissions
to
propose
what
seems
like
a
fair
delegation
to
pay
for
this
work.
A
Cool
thanks
will
all
right,
so
just
dan
want
to
do
it.
Super
brief
yeah
yeah.
D
D
I
want
to
push
that
just
a
little
bit
higher
to
up
above
80
percent
and
and
which
is
just
like
amazing.
I
don't
see
those
kind
of
numbers
in
any
of
the
other.
D
Yeah
rock
the
boat
yeah
yeah,
so
I
mean
we're
already
above
above
bar
here,
so
it's
it's
really
awesome
that
everybody's
like
actively
voting.
D
What
I'd
like
to
have
what
I'd
like
to
see
more
of
really
is
kind
of
the
the
governance
forum
commonwealth
discussions
right
now,
we've
got
you
know
about
one
and
a
quarter
active
addresses
and
that's
just
over
a
period
of
two
weeks,
probably
a
little
higher
than
that,
but
yeah
like
one
of
the
the
next
steps,
and
actually
you
know
besides
the
discord
and
you
know
going
on
to
chain,
is
you
want
to
get
in
that
governance
forum
and
really
like
get
a
soft
consensus
going
there?
D
So
it'd
be
nice
if
people
really
started
being
more
active
on
there,
there's
just
tons
of
really
great
discussions
like
the
one
will
was
just
just
mentioning
so
yeah.
There's
at
this
point
really
not
that
much
happening.
But
as
there's
more
you
know,
governance
proposals
coming
online,
such
as
upgrades
and
community,
spend
proposals,
credit
class
creator,
proposals,
there's
going
to
just
be
a
lot
more
governance
activity
as
it
is
so
get
out.
There
start
commenting
and
get
your
voice
heard.
Besides
just
voting.
A
Cool
thanks
dan
all
right
and
I
think
this
one's
for
yeah
or
maybe
ryan
you
or
ryan
around
the
docks,
upgrades
and
whatnot.
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
can-
I
can
go
ahead
and
take
it
unless
ryan
is,
is
really
itching
to
talk,
but
so
really
another
thing
and
actually
ryan-
and
I
were
talking
about
this-
is
you
know,
we'd
love
to
get
more
engagement
on
github
and
and
really
get
those
community
developers?
You
know
activate
them.
Have
them.
You
know,
jump
into
our
our
github
and
start.
You
know
working
on
some
of
the
issues
or
maybe
if
they
have
ideas
or
they
want
to
see
things
change.
I
mean
it's
open
source,
it's
decentralized!
D
Let's
work
together,
we're
building
all
of
the
tools
that
you
need
for
success,
so
we've
got.
The
docs
ryan
has
been
doing
a
fantastic
job
on
that
he
just
recently
updated
it
added
some
new
sections
for
mostly
cli,
but
we'll
be
we'll
actually
be
adding
some
more
tutorials
too.
So
the
next
tutorials
that
ryan's
going
to
be
working
on
is
you
know
how
to
do
different
proposals.
So
really
governance
focused
at
this
point
as
far
as
the
the
docs
and
everything
are
concerned,
but
we're
expanding
them
out.
D
A
Awesome,
fantastic
all
right,
so
just
this
is
just
a
shout
out
to
say
I
mean.
D
Yeah
I
mean
this
is
yeah.
This
is
also
a
slide
that
I
did.
I
can
just
briefly
talk
yeah,
so
I
wrote
a
medium
blog
on
exactly
how
to
do
a
community
spend
proposal.
There's
two
different
ways
of
doing
it.
You
can
do
it
via
cli.
If
that's
your
thing
or
commonwealth
actually
makes
it
really
easy
to
just
use
their
their
user
interface,
and
you
can
I
mean
it's
super
easy.
D
D
A
D
D
A
I
just
want
to
shout
out,
while
we
have
the
cambium
guys
here,
I
think
it
would
be
super
cool
to
think
about
a
quadratic,
quadratic
funding
pool,
and
I
know
that
open
that
this
has
been
talked
about
an
open
team.
A
Github
does,
and
I
think
all
right
I
mean
git
coin
does
and
I
think
we
could
probably
integrate
with
them.
They're
actually
going
to
be
integrating
atoms
and
maybe
even
other
ibc
app
assets
into
bitcoin
rounds,
which
is
cool
so
anyway.
There's
like
some
there's
something
really
interesting
there.
That
is
like,
I
think,
worthwhile,
there's
a
lot
of
other
things
as
well,
but
I
think
that
would
really
spur
people
to
be
using
it
more
because
it's
sort
of
a
democratized
like
hey
we'll.
A
You
know
we
want
10
different
proposals
to
get
matching
funding
and
we'll
do
on-chain
voting
about
that.
You
know,
and
people
can
start
using
their
region
to
allocate
to
the
kind
of
development
or
work
that
they
want
to
see.
So
it's
sort
of
like
lots
of
signal
lots
of
signal
can
be
captured
in
some
way.
So
anyway,
that's
that's
just
an
idea
that
I
have
okay,
so
I
want
to
take
a
moment
to
just
give
everybody
sort
of
like
the
full
interchange
carbon
update.
A
I
forg
in
our
slideshow
here
I
forgot
to
put
first
like
yay.
Congratulations.
We
passed
the
the
one
of
the
highest
turnout
and,
and
the
definitely
least
controversial
osmosis
community,
spend
proposal
in
the
history
of
osmosis.
The
community
is
behind
launching
a
carbon
market
on
osmosis
in
partnership
with
region.
So
that's
really
exciting.
A
Okay,
so
that
aside,
let
me
just
see
where
did
I?
How
did
I
put
this?
So
the
big
takeaway
here
is
and
sorry
things
are
in
there's
a
lot
of
text
here
and
it's
in
this
strange
order.
I
feel
like
so
we're
going
to
wait.
A
A
Over-The-Counter
way
and
we're
going
to
sell
them,
basically
at
our
cost
price
cost
basis,
which
is
lower
than
the
cost
currently
on
osmosis
or
on
polygon.
Are
I
mean
higher
than
the
price
currently
on
polygon,
but
lower
than
the
price
has
fluctuated?
So
there's
been
enough
volatility
that
it's
sort
of
in
the
middle
of
that
volatility
band.
A
A
Okay,
so,
as
I
said
the
real
goal
here,
we
really
want
to
avoid
like
pumping
up
nct
in
an
unsustainable
way.
We
want
it
to
be
reflective
of
the
price
of
carbon
and
we
want
to
have
be
driving
larger
carbon
demand
for
these
assets.
So
that's
why
we're
holding
off
like
we
don't
want.
You
know
it's
like
a
classic
move
in
the
crypto
space,
to
sort
of
like
be
like:
hey,
there's
a
really
limited
supply
and
we're
generating
lots
of
demand
for
it.
You
know,
actually,
that's
not
what
we
want
to
do
here.
A
That's
counter
counter
productive
for
this,
like
larger
goals
that
we
have
right.
So
that's
why
we're
being
sort
of
conservative
in
the
launch?
A
It's
not
just
a
fully
fungible
token.
These
tokens
have
to
come
with
retirement
functionality
and
that's
not
something
that's
on
most
people's
road
maps
as
far
as
bridges
are,
but
axelr.
That
kind
of
thing
is
actually
in
there
in
their
road
map,
so
we'll
be
starting
with
a
more
custodial
bridge
solution
to
just
get
this
going.
Current
estimation
is
early
may,
which
I
would
note,
knock
on
wood
and
disclaimers
about
testing
and
all
the
rest
of
it
is
also
similar
to
what
we're
shooting
for
for
region
ledger
4.0.
A
So
we
may
have
a
scenario
in
which
nct
and
our
marketplace
interfaces
and
all
sorts
of
other
cool
things
are
sort
of
like
converging
in
a
really
exciting
launch.
But
we
want
to
keep
building
these
out
and
we'll
be
transparent.
We'll
keep
updating
people
here
and
you
know
all
the
disclaimers
about.
This
requires
testing
and
there's
sort
of
like
a
complex
series
of
events
and
there's
multiple
stakeholders
involved.
Osmosis
toucan
us
collaborating
together,
so
don't
want
to
make
promises.
We
can't
keep
okay,
so
governance.
A
A
Go
vote.
If
you
haven't
already.
Probably
most
people
on
the
call
have
already
have
already
voted.
If
not,
it's
always
useful
to
get
the
voting
signal
earlier
and
if
there's
dissonance
have
those
conversations
and
just
an
update
around
osmosis
prop
176
that
they
voted.
I
think
they're
the
first
decentralized
community
first
protocol
at
a
protocol
level
to
vote
to
offset
themselves
not
have
like
the
foundation
or
the
core
team
just
purchase
some
offsets
and
make
a
public
a
pr
release
about
it,
so
that
the
community
participated
in
this
and
also
natively
on
chain
credits.
A
So
this
is
a
first
very
exciting
and
then
182
was
them
purchasing
100
000
nct.
To
be
initial
liquidity
providers
for
this
pool,
which
is
also
super,
exciting,
there's
three
important
discussions
going
on
commonwealth
one,
maybe
I'll
get
a
quick
hand
it
over
to
will
to
discuss
briefly,
is
around
upgrading
our
token
economics
to
incentivize
liquidity.
The
second
is
sort
of
a
a
kind
of
competing
approach.
A
To
our
token
token,
economic,
a
token
economic
upgrade
that
robert
put
up-
and
the
third
is
a
discussion
about
supporting
a
community
member
who
lost
their
private
keys,
I
think
or
somehow
lost
access
to
their
their
wallet
and
all
three
are
important
and
very
different
or
or
I
guess
two
of
these
are
similar
different
approaches,
and
the
third
is
more
like
hey:
what
do
we
do
as
a
community?
A
If
something
like
this
happens,
do
we
want
to
take
responsibility
for
that
or
not?
You
know,
there's
an
open
conversation
about
that,
and
if
we
do
want
to
take
responsibility,
how
do
we
do
that
in
the
best
possible
way,
etc?
Will
do
you
want
to
add
anything
about
the
lp
incentivization
forum
post?
There.
C
Sure
yeah
I
presented
about
this
here
before,
but
the
the
basic
idea
here
is
thinking
about
the
economic
building
blocks
for
the
success
of
regen
network
and
gregory,
and
I
articulated
a
lot
about
this
in
the
economics
paper
that
we
had
published
a
couple
years
ago,
but
the
the
basics
being.
The
first
thing
you
incentivize
is
things
to
increase
network
security.
So
you
have
a
proof
of
stake
token
and
you
compensate
people
who
stake
their
tokens
and
and
new
operate
validators.
C
My
proposal
here
is
to
have
the
next
layer
of
incentive.
Incentivization
be
lp
incentives,
this
being
because
the
the
main
way
people
can
access.
The
regen
token
is
on
dexes
the
more
liquidity
there
is
on
those
dexes,
the
less
price
volatility
and
less
slippage
and
more
efficient
trades
people
can
have.
C
So
this
is
sort
of
a
layer,
two
of
tokenomics
and
then
I
think,
there's
a
huge
range
of
kind
of
the
third
third
layer
up
both
on
the
kind
of
what
we
can
do
with
eco
credits,
as
well
as
being
able
to
incentivize
other
contributions
to
the
network.
So
I
don't
see
my
proposal
as
much
competing
with
the
the
one
that
robert
has
below
as
just
being
something
that's
simpler
and
could
come
first,
and
I
see
roberts
being
kind
of
more
complex
and
things
that
we
could
implement
in
years
to
come.
A
Yeah,
although
he
might
disagree
with
that,
because
I
think
the
complexity
of
an
of
a
a
protocol
level,
lp
incentivization
has
to
do
with
interchange,
accounts
and
a
set
of
other
technical
technically
challenging
implementation
details,
whereas
I
think
his
relies
more
on
sort
of
a
you
know,
sub
like
allocating
to
sub
addresses
that
then
are
managed
by
you
know
a
group's
account
or
something
else
like
that
that
is
maybe
technically
easier
to
implement.
But
anyway,
so
there's
a
conversation.
There
dig
in
share
your
opinions.
A
I
think
everybody's
sort
of
trending
in
the
same
in
a
similar
direction,
although
maybe
there's
some
divergence
in
how
robert
and
will
are
thinking
about
liquidity.
There
were
some
really
cool
ideas
in
that
forum
post
around
actually
like
regen
as
a
protocol,
owning
liquidity
and
providing
it
instead
of
incentivizing.
It
there's
there's
something
really
interesting
there
that
I
think
that's
worth
talking
about
and
as
always
there's
this
balance
between
its
implementation
details
and
it's
sort
of
effective
results
in
the
sort
of
political
economic
sense.
So.
C
I'm
just
seeing
a
question
from
paul
in
the
chat
here
around
osmosis
super
fluid
staking,
and
I
guess
the
the
short
of
it
is
that
super
fluid
is
relevant
on
dexes,
but
liquid
staking
is
relevant
in
other,
like
their
quicksilver.
Is
one
liquid
staking.
Where
you
have
you
take
your
tokens,
you
get
a
derivative,
you
could
do
other
things
with
it,
so
I
don't
I
mean
from
from
what
I
know
based
on
our
tokenomics.
We
wouldn't
be
implementing
superfluid,
but
we
could
implement
liquid.
At
some
point.
I
I.
A
Think
I
I'm
going
to
advocate
strongly
for
us
to
at
least
start
testing
liquid
staking
in
test
nets
and
whatnot,
alongside
quicksilver
and
and
modeling,
and
playing
around
with
how
that
you
know
could
work
and
how
it
could
create
interesting
efficiencies
and
incentives
in
different
ways.
I
think
there's
some
really
nice
ways
to
sort
of
like
create
a
virtuous
economic
cycle,
so
I
think
we
should
be
exploring
that.
A
I
do
think
there
is
potentially
a
crazy
world
in
which
both
of
them
do
exist
on
region
ledger
if
and
when
we
and
and
maybe
never
lands
on
region
ledger.
But
there
is
a
world
in
which
our
order
book
decks
fuses
and
has
relationship
with
amm
liquidity
pools
for
certain
pairs
because
they're,
not
it's
not
a
completely
either
or
thing,
and
so
our
team
has
been
dis.
A
Talking
about
that,
and
I
believe
that
that
would
most
likely
be
an
integration
with
osmosis
and
an
interchain
accounts
thing,
and
maybe
in
that,
in
that
scenario,
you'd
see
sort
of
a
super
fluid
a
super
fluid
scenario
in
which
region
and
like
nct
or
whatever,
are
integrated
on
the
amm
through
regions
marketplace
and
anyway.
There's
some
scenarios
in
which
something
like
that
could
happen,
but
there's
both
technical
complexity
as
well
as
sort
of
economic
and
governance
complexity
to
work
through
how
that
gets
deployed
and
in
what
scenarios.
A
So,
okay
reminder
regenerating
newshour.
It's
been
super
fun.
Last
week
we
it's
always
a
little
bit
emergent,
which,
by
that
I
mean
last
minute,
but
last
week
we
had
a
really
fun
conversation
about
that.
The
data,
module
and
approach
to
ecological
data
had
some
great
participation,
really
a
living,
a
live
conversation
amongst
community
members
who
hadn't
necessarily
gotten
to
talk
before,
and
we
were
doing
it
in
public.
It
was
really
fun
and
I
really
like
like
doing
it.
That
way.
Actually.
A
Have
a
quick
look
at
the
market
liquidity
report?
I
won't
spend
too
much
time
on
this.
We've
had
a
nice
healthy
bump
of
engagement
around
nct
launch
and
I
think,
as
we
as
we
roll
out
region,
ledger
four
and
an
nct
really
becomes
an
asset
in
the
interchange.
I'm
excited
about
how
that's
driving,
engagement
and
sort
of
health
on
the
market
side
and
just
thought
this
would
be
fun
to
share
with
everybody.
A
There's
been
a
lot
of
cool
creativity
and
gifting
of
art
and
memes
in
the
discord
channel
and
on
twitter
super
fun,
and
this
is
only
some
of
it.
That's
been
sort
of
like
swirling
around,
so
I
myself,
I'm
pretty
excited
about
the
potential
of
nft
art,
curation
gallery
fusion,
with
the
eco
credit
stuff,
so
stay
tuned,
and
with
that,
let's
I'm
gonna
just
check
in
on
the
time.
We're
probably
way
over
our
yeah
we're
we're
at
the
end
of
the
hour.
Anybody.
A
Yeah,
we
did
not
do
good
anybody
have
any
quick
questions
or
comments
out
there.
They
like
to
share
or
important
news.
A
Cool
well
hopefully,
this
has
been
useful
kind
of
going
over
the
the
major
bits
of
news
in
the
ecosystem.
If
you
have
feedback
for
what
these
calls
look
and
feel
like,
please
feel
free
to
share
and
yeah
have
a
beautiful
week,
everybody
or
beautiful
two
weeks.
Until
this
call
and
probably
see
all
of
you
in
different
venues
over
the
the
rest
of
the
week
and
next
so
yeah
tell
everybody.