►
From YouTube: Decentralized Science, Supporting Claims by Building Community – Regen Science Q3 Update 2021
Description
We believe in open sourcing not just our ecological assets and tools, but our learnings and process. We’ve decided to share this video of our recent internal Regen Science team deep dive to give our community of scientists, partners, and token holders a look into the future of our science program structure built for collaboration.
A
Welcome
everyone:
this
is
our
science
deep
dive
and
we
are
happy
to
have
everyone
here
in
order
to
share.
What's
the
science
team
doing
what
has
been
the
the
primary
focus
in
the
last
months,
so
I'm
just
a
woman,
I'm
the
lead
scientist
and
sam
bennett
and
sophia
laker
are
here
and
going
to
be
presenting
with
with
me
from
the
science
team
at
region
network.
A
So,
in
order
to
create
all
this
knowledge
and
tools,
we
have
our
principal,
I
would
say
our
main
principles
or
core
values
which
are
scientific
integrity
independency.
So
we
think
of
the
science
team,
always
as
an
independent
group
from
from
the
business
model
itself,
we
aim
to
have
everything
open,
source
and
transparent.
B
B
The
three
of
us
worked
a
lot
on
the
impact
ag
projects
and
kind
of
developing
our
own
methodology
and
running
through
the
process
of
like
creating
an
ecological
asset,
and
it
was
a
great
experience,
but
over
the
last
few
months,
we've
kind
of
shifted
away
from
our
own
internal
methodology,
development
and
started
to
think
more
broadly
about
what
is
the
science
team
going
to
do?
Who
are
we
going
to
support,
and
so
in
kind
of
thinking?
B
Through
that
conversation,
we
were
like
okay,
like
what
is
the
main
goal
here,
which
for
us
is
turning
ecological
services
and
nature-based
solutions
into
ecological
assets
and
that's
a
pretty
complex
process,
because
at
a
high
level,
it's
just
like
the
science
tracking
ecological
change,
but
that
needs
to
be
translated
into
methodology.
It
needs
to
be
communicated
to
lanswords.
B
So
we're
really
focused
on
kind
of
looking
at
you
know:
methodology
development,
the
scientific
r
d,
the
digital,
mrv
and
kind
of
just
like
you
know,
making
that
process
easier,
peer
review
and
curation
so
figuring
out.
You
know
like
which
methods
are
more
scientifically
rigorous
than
others
which
are
more
accessible
to
land
stewards.
B
You
know
kind
of
letting
the
commons
decide
of
you
know
which,
which
methods
they
want
to
use
registry
ledger
integration,
so
figuring
out
like
how
do
we
get
all
this
scientific
data
and
information
onto
the
ledger
and
then
finally,
science,
communication,
which
is
really
important
because
there's
a
kind
of
a
gap
between
the
work,
that's
being
done
on
the
ground
and
the
science
behind
it?
And
we
want
to
make
it
easy
for
everyone
to
understand.
What's
happening.
A
So
I'm
going
to
explain
a
little
bit
some
of
the
tools
that
we
are
creating
for
internal
and
user
experience
of
our
platform
in
order
to
support
the
lens
works
and
the
project
developers
mainly
so
we
are
creating,
for
instance,
some
carbon
class
credits,
progressing
systems
tools,
the
potential
sequestration
rates,
calculator
and
the
sample
size.
Calculator
are
two
of
the
main
under
current
development.
A
The
intention
from
the
potential
sequestration
rates
calculator
is
that
it
will
also
be
able
to
be
replicated
for
other
prototypes
for
future
development.
So
I'm
going
to
explain
a
little
bit
more.
What
or
all
these
tools
are
about
and
next
yeah.
So
one
question
that
we
need
to
answer
is:
what's
the
potential
sequestration
rate
from
projects
under
improved
grazing
management.
A
Multiple
stakeholders
need
this
an
answer
to
this
question
before
they
enter
a
credit,
for
instance
a
program
or
before
they
they
want
to
separate,
because
they
need
to
make
informed
decisions
around
that
also
for
internal
use.
Our
registry
needs
to
know
what's
the
potential
of
a
project
in
order
to
get
rewards
from
carbon
credits
all
around
the
world,
so
we
created
this
potential
sequestration
rates,
calculator
which
is
under
current
development.
A
The
intention
is
that,
based
on
what
we
found
are
the
sequestration
rates
from
all
the
grazing
systems
that
we
could
gather
all
around
the
world,
we
could
create
some
model
that
that
can
explain
based
on
proxies
or
explanatory
variables.
This
model
could
show
what
are
the
potential
sequestration
rates
so
next.
A
So
let's
imagine
this
is
an
example,
but
this
is
the
way
we
where
this
is
close
to
what
we
are
we
are
creating.
You
could
have
information
from
the
project
based
on
the
geolocation
related
to
the
soil
type
of
the
project.
The
main
climate
class,
the
management
practices-
this
could
be
something
that
it's
provided
by
the
project
developer
and
some
sort
of
information,
around
sale,
content
of
the
cells
or
topographic
information
that
we
can
also
gather
from
gis.
A
So
once
we
have
all
this
information
based
on
the
reported
information
from
the
project
developer
and
from
the
gis
based
on
the
geolocation
of
the
project,
we
can
next
step.
We
can
show,
what's
the
potential
conservative
estimation
of
the
solar,
organic
carbon
sequestration
rate
for
that
area.
So
this
is
better
than
having
what
we
had,
which
was
only
a
global
average
of
potential
sequestration
rates
from
grazing
management,
which
is
what's
currently
currently
available
out.
A
We
created
this
sample
size
calculator,
which
is
something
new.
So
now
we
can
estimate
we
created
a
model
based
on
a
lot
of
literature
research
where
we
linked
the
sample
sizes
that
we're
providing
for
different
levels
of
accuracy
for
projects
with
high
medium
and
low
variability
in
the
solar
and
carbon.
And
so
now
we
created
this
this
tool,
which
is
simple
to
use
where
we
can
simply
put
as
an
input
the
grasslands
size
of
the
project
and
by
a
minimum
knowledge
of
what's
the
potential
diversity
of
this
organic
carbon
within
the
property.
A
Based
on
some
questions
that
we
ask
to
the
land
products
to
the
project
developers,
then
we
can
estimate
the
minimum
sample
size
and
the
optimal
sample
size,
optimal
sample
size
means
there's
a
higher
accuracy
and
a
lower
chance
that
there
will
be
any
discounts
based
on
uncertainty
and
minimum
sample
size.
It's.
What
the
science
team
considers
is
the
minimum
amount
of
samples
that
ensures
at
least
a
50
percent
accuracy,
which
is
the
lowest
answer
and
accuracy
that
that
our
mythology
allows.
C
Wonderful,
so
now
that
giselle
has
kind
of
touched
on
how
we're
supporting
land
stewards
I'm
going
to
pivot
a
little
bit
to
one
of
the
other
communities
that
sam
highlighted
that
highlighted
at
the
beginning,
which
is
how
we're
supporting
methodology,
designers,
so
kind
of
there's
many
components
of
this.
There's
many
needs
here
like
sam
mentioned
at
the
beginning.
C
Some
of
the
other
questions
we
had
to
answer
is
you
know
how
do
how
do
we
deal
with
an
individual
that
comes
to
us
with
just
an
idea
right?
So
some
people
are
coming
to
us
with.
You
know,
extensive
background
on
ghg
accounting
principles,
but
others
are
coming
to
us
with
just
an
idea
of
a
specific
indicator
that
they
see
within
their
own
local
ecosystem.
So
you
know
how
do
we?
How
do
we
deal
with
that?
Like?
Is
there
a
concept,
no
situation
there?
C
Another
question
we
had
to
work
to
answer
is:
what
does
the
review
process
look
like?
Where
might
requirements
differ
from
methodology
to
methodology
and
again
yeah
making
sure
this
process
works
for
a
range
of
methodology,
developers
and
kind
of
meets
everybody
where
they're
at
so
we?
I
won't
dig
too
deep
into
the
details
here,
but
overall
we
created
a
a
workflow
that
kind
of
walks
one
through
the
process
of
taking
a
method.
C
C
People
will
be
able
to
work
through
them
so
kind
of
just
at
a
high
level,
again
a
huge
shout
out
to
the
whole
registry
dev
team,
for
putting
this
all
together
in
website
phase
and
kind
of
taking
some
some
of
our
murals
and
documents
and
putting
it
in
a
really
great
workflow.
So
you
know,
starting
at
the
beginning,
checking
if
a
methodology
already
exists,
you
know
if
they,
if
they
have
an
idea,
but
something
already
exists,
maybe
see
if
it
can
fit
into
that
box.
C
C
So
that's
one
of
the
kind
of
first
pages
we
created
to
to
support
this
process
and
onboarding
methodology,
designers
and
developers
and,
as
I
mentioned
kind
of
the
second
component
of
this
is,
is
how
does
the
review
process
work?
What
does
it
take
to
to
go
through
a
review
and
have
it
listed
on
our
website?
C
So,
like
I
mentioned
it's
going
to
start
at
an
internal
review.
Taking
a
couple
weeks
to
you
know
at
least
check
that
all
the
ghg
accounting
principles
are
there.
You
know
everything
is
that
kind
of
needs
to
fall
into
the
methodology
exists
and
then
the
second
part
of
it,
and-
and
this
is
where
there
might
be
some
differences
depending
on
what
type
of
method
and
what
type
of
credit
are
being
developed,
is
an
external
review
process,
and
this
is
broken
into
two
parts.
They
can
be
run
at
the
same
time.
C
The
first
is
opening
up
the
methodology
to
a
30-day
public
comment
period
there.
Anyone
that
has
you
know,
feedback
or
questions
or
critiques
or
concerns
can
drop
in
all
of
this
into
you
know
a
specific
form
and
the
other
component
of
that
is
to
have
a
couple
scientific
advisors
relevant
to
the
methodology
review
it.
So
you
know
if
it's
a
forestry
project
or
forestry
method.
Having
someone
that
knows
the
background
of
forestry,
related
methods
review
it.
C
D
C
Yeah,
I
don't
think
we
have
that
we
don't
have
that
specific
process
outlined
say
on
paper
or
on.
You
know
this
website,
but
we
do
have
outlined
what
different
components
would
need
to
change
in
order
for
it
to
like
level
up.
Might
you
say:
does
that
make
sense
so
like
the
different
ghg
accounting
principles
yeah,
and
we
have
kind
of
documentation
around
all
that
that
still
has
to
be
developed
in
more
of
the
website
form
yeah,
awesome.
C
C
C
You
know
that
scares
a
lot
of
people
away
so
something
that
sam
and
I
actually
leaned
in
pretty
heavily
on,
is
creating
these
framework
methodologies
and
we
started
at
a
high
level
which
we
call
their
nature-based
solutions
framework
methodology,
and
this
is
a
universal
framework
which
just
highlights
the
various
components
that
need
to
be
considered
when
developing
a
methodology
for
ecosystem
service
claims.
You
know
providing
a
general
structure
and
kind
of
definitions
for
like
what
is
it.
What
does
additionality
mean?
C
What
does
leakage
mean
and
what
are
the
different
components
and
approaches
you
can
take
kind
of
nested
under
that
are
specific
framework
methodologies
for
specific
indicators.
So
we
also
have
developed
out
more
in
draft
form
right
now,
but
a
soil
organic
carbon
framework
methodology
that
outlines
the
set
of
requirements
needed
for
any.
C
You
know:
soil,
organic
carbon
stock
quantification
claim-
and
this
could
be
like
ours
for
grazing,
but
also
could
apply
for
someone
developing
a
method
for
soil,
organic
carbon
in
a
cropping
system
for
cover,
cropping
or
even
in
a
forestry
system,
so
kind
of
the
sub
primary
indicator
framework
methods
to
kind
of
support.
These
methodology
developers
yeah
I'll
transition
it
back
to
sam
and
we're
going
to
dive
more
into
the
credit
side
of
things.
B
B
So
thinking
back
to
kind
of
like
our
framework
methodologies,
you
can
go
back.
One
like
our
framework
methodologies,
we're
kind
of
providing
them
with
a
template.
So
it's
like
hey,
like
you,
are
seeing
a
specific
set
of
like
you
know
things
in
your
area
and
rather
than
reinventing
the
process
like
you
can
use
other
people's
methodologies
or
you
could
use
one
of
our
frameworks
and
design
a
solution
that
fits
for
you
and
what
the
credit
class
does.
Is
it
buckets
all
of
these
solutions
into
a
single
credit?
B
B
Every
credit
is
going
to
have
a
nature
based
solution,
so
whether
you're
doing
like
composting
or
agriculture-
or
you
know,
reforestation
or
rotational
grazing,
like
there's,
going
to
be
some
sort
of
nature
based
solution
and
with
that
there's
going
to
be
a
primary
indicator.
So
are
you
looking
at
soil,
organic
carbon?
Are
you
looking
at
biodiversity?
B
Are
you
looking
at
water
quality
like
what
is
your
ind,
like
your
scientific
indicator,
to
show
that
this
practice
is
working
and
similarly
there's
going
to
be
a
crediting
unit?
So
the
classic
one
is
tons
of
carbon,
but
it
could
be.
You
know
like
hectares
of
regenerated
land
or
it
could
be.
You
know,
tons
of
compost.
B
You
know
taken
to
a
plant
or
something
like
that,
and
so
the
the
top
line
kind
of
just
defines
all
the
elements
that
methodology
would
need
to
satisfy
to
use
that
credit
class
and
what
we
do
is
we
want
to
define
those
somewhere
like
in
a
pdf,
so
the
credit
class
you
see
on
our
website
is
kind
of
just
an
it's
like
educational.
It's
like
you
know
if
I
want
to
use
this
credit
class,
here's
the
description
of
the
credit
class
and
here's
the
description
of
all
these
different
things.
B
B
You
know
so
like
thinking
through
this
a
little
bit
more
like
if
we
say
additionality
is
like
required
in
a
credit
class
like
that's
simply
just
a
yes
or
no
like.
Are
you,
including
additionality
in
this
credit
class?
Like?
Are
you
including
aggregate
projects
in
this
credit
class?
Yes
or
no
within
the
pdf?
We
might,
you
know,
explain
like
what
is
additionality
what's
considered
additionality,
so
people
can
know
whether
or
not
they're
doing
that,
and
then
you
know
like
on
like
a
more
kind
of
metadata
representation.
B
We
could
say
for
this
credit
class
additionality
is
yes,
aggregate
projects
are
allowed.
Similarly,
like
land
ownership
type,
you
could
have
you
know,
credits
that
are
specifically
designed,
for
you
know
indigenous
landscapes
or
those
that
kind
of
encompass
like
public
private.
You
know
indigenous
the
whole
thing,
and
this
is
kind
of
just
showing
what
that
looks
like
and
then
the
methodology
down
below
is
where
you
actually
describe
like.
How
am
I
measuring
additionality?
B
C
Great,
so
now
that
sam
has
given
a
little
bit
of
a
background
on
how
we
developed
it
kind
of
the
next
step
was
figuring
out
some
use
cases.
Let's
throw
some
examples
at
it
and
see
how
this
credit
class
design
stands
so
kind
of
zooming
in
you
can
see
on
the
left.
These
are
a
bunch
of
different
approaches
and
and
different
credits
that
could
be
aligned
to
say
reforestation
or
cover
cropping
we're
going
to
zoom
in
really
specifically
on
rotational
grazing,
especially
in
relation
to
our
current
credit
that
we
have
developed.
C
So
when
you're
thinking
about
a
rotational
grazing
credit,
again
kind
of
thinking
about
this
in
terms
of
buckets
so
on
the
left,
you
have
a
bucket,
which
is
a
more
of
an
institutional
credit,
so
your
ecosystem
type
is
grasslands.
You
have
a
nature-based
solution
of
rotational
grazing
and
the
credit
unit
is
in
tons
of
carbon
of
co2
equivalent
sequestered.
So
this
is
kind
of
where
you
know
our
personal
carbon
plus
methodology
would
fall.
You
know
you
have
ghd
accounting
principles
such
as
leakage
and
verification
required
within
this
credit
class.
C
Then
you
would
have
a
list
of
approved
methodologies.
So
as
long
as
each
methodology
fits
everything
in
those
blue
and
orange
squares,
it
can
fall
into
the
bucket
of
approved
methodologies.
Under
this
credit
class
and
again,
this
one
method
could
be
you
know,
including
infield
samples.
Another
might
be
more
model
based,
but
again
as
long
as
it
checks
all
the
boxes
of.
What's
in
those
orange
squares,
you're
good
to
go
and
kind
of
aligned
with
that
is
another
bucket
of
approved
code
benefits
which
align
with
this
specific
credit
class.
C
So
you
could
take
a
lan
steward,
would
come
kind
of
assess.
You
know
what
are
the
different
approaches
that
could
be
used
for
this
specific
credit
and
then
pull
out
the
approved
co-benefits
that
work
best
for
their
specific
use
case
and
then
kind
of
to
zoom
out
a
little
bit
and
move
over
to
the
right.
This
might
be
something
more
of
a
flex
credit
so
again,
walking
through
the
specific
metadata.
C
The
ecosystem
type
is
still
grasslands,
you're
still
doing
a
nature-based
solution
of
rotational
grazing,
but
in
this
case
the
credit
unit
instead
of
being
tons
of
co2
equivalent
sequestered
it
actually
could
be
something
more
along.
The
lines
of
number
of
hectares
regenerated,
so
this
might
be
more
of
a
practice
based
credit
again,
might
be
a
little
bit
less
rigorous
in
terms
of
scientific
needs.
You
know
you
might
not
have
to
go
out
and
collect
soil
samples
and
do
the
whole
carbon
calculation.
C
But
again
this
might
work
for
a
lot
of
land
stewards
who
might
not
want
to
have
that.
You
know
the
super
intensive
requirements
outlined
by
the
institutional
credit.
In
this
practice
credit
it
also
might
have
less
ghg
like
accounting
requirements
in
terms
of
leakage
or
verification
and
again
similar
to
the
left.
You
would
be
able
to
look
at
this
bucket
and
see
the
approved
methods
in
there
and
also
kind
of
the
approved
co-benefit
so
yeah.
C
This
is
just
one
example:
we're
excited
to
kind
of
test
this
out
with
more
edge
cases
and
throw
different
examples
at
it
and
see
how
it
stands,
but
that's
the
main
developments
for
the
credit
class
there
moving
forward
to
to
see
this
in
action.
One
thing
that
we've
been
super
excited
with
on
the
science
team
is:
we've
actually
had
a
lot
of
interest
in
people
reaching
out
to
us
looking
to
develop
methodologies.
C
So
for
this
slide
and
the
next
slide
sam
and
I
are
just
going
to
highlight
some
of
the
the
main
players
we've
been
working
with
they're
coming
at
us
again
with
a
range
of
experience.
Some
of
them
are
coming
at
us
with
a
full
method,
developed
and
ghg
accounting
principles,
kind
of
already
checked
off
and
others
are
more
at
the
development
stage.
So
the
first
is
the
carbon
farming
foundation,
they're
based
out
of
australia,
they're
developing
a
credit
based
on
native
reforestation
on
clear
land.
C
The
second
is
gfs
consulting,
and
this
is
a
really
interesting
group,
they're,
developing
a
method
based
on
certifications
of
organic
farming
and
sustainable
fishing,
specifically
for
italy
and
their
primary
indicator
again,
because
it's
both
above
ground
and
fishing
for
organic
certification
is
carbon
sequestration,
either
through
the
algae
below
or
above
ground.
Biomass
and
they're
also
looking
to
develop
some
co-benefits
of
animal
welfare
and
ecosystem
health,
and
the
third
is
bio,
hab
and
they're
doing
a
mushroom
based
credit
where
they're
taking
mushrooms
and
using
that
material.
B
The
next
one,
which
is
really
exciting.
Is
this
one
alimenta
where
they're
down
in
peru,
they're
taking
chicken
fertilizer
from
the
biggest
egg
producer
in
peru
and
then
they're
turning
that
into
soil
amendments
which
they're
then
putting
into
different
like
grows
of
trees,
to
help
increase
the
soil
and
the
co-benefit
that
they're
choosing
to
do,
which,
I
think
is
really
cool,
is
micro,
biodiversity,
so
they're,
taking
an
approach
to
biodiversity,
where
they're
actually
looking
at
soil
samples
and
seeing
the
diversity
of
various
microbes
there,
which
is
pretty
cool?
B
Finally,
we
have
this
group
called
soil
key
that
rebecca
and
sarah
were
talking
to
for
a
while
and
they're
really
excited
about
developing
their
own
method,
which
is
a
combination
of
rotational
grazing
and
field
aeration,
so
twice
a
year.
They
go
and
aerate
the
fields,
and
then
they
use
rotational
grazing
practices
and
it's
shown
to
increase
soil
carbon
quite
a
bit
and
kind
of
like
rebuild.
You
know
soil
structure
and
soil
health,
and
it's
actually
the
only
project
that
has
gone
through
the
erf
for
a
soil
credit
and
the
erf.
B
Is
the
government
sponsor
australian
standard,
so
pretty
cool
to
be
working
with
them?
Here's
just
like
a
map
of
where
these
organizations
are
like
we're
working
with
people
like
in
italy
and
israel,
and
you
know
australia
and
africa.
So
I'm
getting
a
pretty
diverse,
set
of
individuals
engaged
with
our
platform.
C
A
A
We
also
gain
in
in
being
updated
of
new
developments,
tools
and
technology
and
yeah.
So
in
that
sense
we
are
collaborating
with
the
airshot
labs,
which
is
an
open
source
community,
a
public
benefit
technology,
company
and
sustainable
asset
manager.
We
are
also
working
actively
active
with
climate
farmers.
A
A
So
the
goal
of
the
accelerator
is
to
identify
the
best
principles
and
practices
for
one
target
region
in
this
case
is
northern
california
and
to
establish
a
shared
market-driven
strategy
that
helps
regional
food
purchasers
to
support
a
locally
based
regenerative
agriculture
model.
So
they
have
been
developing
standards
for
iconography
and
we
are
going
to
be
participating
in
in
a
more
gis
related
group,
which
also
links
with
the
project
that
I'm
going
to
share.
Next.
A
A
Imagine
this
tool
as
an
onion.
So
first
you
have
all
the
layers
that
matter
for
the
purpose
of
developing
the
sustainable
regenerative
management
practices
layer.
So
we
want
to
know
what
are
the
potential
regenerative
management
practices
that
could
be
applied
in
each
piece
of
the
world,
based
on
some
constraints
like
climatic,
topographic
or
historical
constraints?
A
So
that's
the
next
layer
that
we
we
need
to
build.
Then
the
next
layer
is
around
storytelling.
So
this
is
great
for
culture
building
and
for
informing
farmers.
What
are
their
opportunities?
So,
first
a
farmer
would
have
information
of
what
are
the
potential
suitable,
suitable
practices
they
could
implement.
A
So
it's
a
very
complex
and
and
what,
when
we
are
actively
working
with
all
the
communities
we
we
mentioned
before,
in
particular
with
the
airshot,
in
order
to
create
all
the
layers
that
need
to
be
built
for
this
global
map
and
another
contribution
I
already
described
it
is
the
sample
size
calculator.
So
I
won't
go
deeper
into
this
one,
but
this
is
an
unprecedented
tool.
A
I
want
to
share
that
for
anyone
willing
to
know
what's
the
amount
of
samples
that
they
would
need
in
order
to
apply
either
our
mythology
or
any
interpolation
special
interpolation
of
ground
truth
data.
They
could
use
this
tool.
So
it's
a
broader
contribution
that
just
to
our
stakeholders,
yeah
so
sam,
would
you
explain
yeah.
B
B
You
know
like
soil
variables
as
well
as
like
vegetation,
and
so
this
is
a
kind
of
a
complex
process.
There's
a
lot
of
statistical
analysis
which
goes
into
it.
But
it's
really
important
and
a
lot
of
different
organizations
are
interested
in
building
a
stratification
tool.
That's
like
open
source
and
publicly
available,
because
you
know
the
only
ones
that
exist
right
now
are
private
and
you
have
to
pay
for
them.
B
So
we've
been
working
with
rsi,
who
was
kind
of
leading
this
charge
on
building
out
a
tool
as
well
as
our
group.
This
group
called
climate
farmers
out
in
germany
and
some
people
associated
with
white
buffalo
land
trust
to
build
an
open
source
stratification
tool
where
land
managers
can
come
in
and
say
like.
B
Yeah
then
another
kind
of
example,
of
how
we're
contributing
to
you
know
the
overall
science
community
is
with
the
earthshot
soils
team.
So
earthshot
is
an
organization
focused
on
doing
you
know,
data
science
that
helps
enhance
our
scientific
understanding
of
climate
change
as
a
means
of
guiding
practice
adoption
for
regenerative
practices.
B
They
have
four
main
teams,
and
one
of
those
is
focused
on
soils,
so
the
soils
team
is
kind
of
separated
into
two
bits.
You
have
the
research
group
which
giselle
has
been
working
with
focused
on
identifying
like
what
are
the
best
regenerative
practices.
How
do
they
affect
the
soil?
Kind
of
you
know,
building
off
her
work
with
sequestration
rates
and
identifying,
like
you
know
what
are
the
best
practices
most
suitable
for
this
area?
B
C
Great
I'm
going
to
keep
science
team
has
been
busy,
so
I'm
going
to
keep
rolling
forward
with
some
scientific
contributions.
Another
component,
which
I
have
been
leaning
into
kind
of,
along
with
both
the
support
of
gisele
and
sam,
is
the
development
and
support
of
co-benefits
so
kind
of
throwing
it
back
to
the
methodology
developers
slide
and
how
we're
working
to
support
them.
C
The
other
component
is
how
to
develop
co-benefits
and
what
are
some
options
for
co-benefits
so
again,
supporting
the
development
of
co-benefits
to
be
incorporated
in
the
aligned
methodologies
and
the
credit
class
design,
or
also
to
be
used
for
storytelling.
So
maybe
the
metrics
aren't
directly
monitored,
but
can
be
used
as
a
good
component
in
the
telling
of
the
story
of
the
credit
and
the
method
so
working
on
developing
some
options
and
indicators
which
potentially
can
be
used
for
various
co-benefits,
such
as
say
water.
C
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
really
briefly,
as
we
wrap
up
doing,
we've
done
a
lot
of
research
on
ghg
accounting
principles
and
methods
on
other
registries.
These
are
a
couple
screenshots
of
just
something,
a
time
where
we
looked
in
a
specific,
say:
american
carbon
registry
method
and
what
were
the
validation
and
verification
components
to
that.
It
helps
us
better
understand
where
the
market
is
and
how
you
know
the
different
approaches
that
we
might
be
considered.
C
We
might
be
considering
when
we're
developing
out
the
verification
procedures
and
different
guidelines
and
standards
around
that.
So
one
of
the
other
components
we've
been
working
on
again
back
to
more
sequestrate
sequestration
rate
research.
This
started
with
one
of
our
interns
frankie,
who
did
a
lot
of
great
work,
looking
into
digging
really
heavily
into
some
papers,
which
she
passed
off,
giselle
on
all
the
different
sequestration
rates
globally
that
can
be
found
for
for
grades
and
systems.
B
B
There's
a
lot
of
other
really
great
work
going
on
that
we'd
be
happy
to
share
and
answer
questions
on,
but
just
to
highlight
like
what
we're
going
to
be
working
on,
probably
in
the
next
month,
or
so,
with
our
grasslands
method.
We're
going
to
be
going
into
the
peer
review
process
to
kind
of
get
that
kick
started
and
get
it
out
of
beta
form.
B
We
were
waiting
on
data
to
be
able
to
actually
like
do
the
science
and
finally
we're
going
to
be
doing
some
community
building.
So,
within
the
next
few
weeks,
we're
going
to
be
hosting
an
event
called
ecosystem
jam,
which
is
focused
on
going
beyond
carbon,
so
how
different
organizations
or
different
groups
have
taken
a
more
holistic
approach
to
regenerative
land
management
and
aren't
necessarily
trying
to
go
for
carbon
credits
so
yeah.
A
Yeah
before
we
open
it
for
questions,
I'd
like
to
give
a
lot
of
claps
to
someone
sophia
who
have
done
an
extraordinary
work
all
this
time
since
they
entered
the
team.
Also
I'd
like
to
thank
and
thank
everyone
in
our
team
in
the
region
network
team
that
they
today
contribute
and
dedicate
so
many
hours
with
us
to
make
all
this
possible.
So
I
started
starting
with
ron
sarah
b
rebecca
jim
piedman
frankie
capeta
many
many
people
contributing
for
making
all
this
possible
for
sure.