►
From YouTube: Unpacking Regen Ledger 2.0 and Ecocredit Module
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Jump
in
I'm
gonna
get
out
of
the
way.
I'm
mostly
gonna.
Listen
to
the
my
colleagues
here
gregory
you
want
to
kind
of
set
the
field
for
us
on
on
what
we're
chatting
about
today.
Definitely.
A
So
welcome
everybody
excited
to
get
into
the
details.
We're
thinking.
We've
been
thinking
of
this
as
sort
of
a
geeky,
deep
dive
into
region,
ledger
2.0
and
specifically
the
new
eco-credit
functionality
that
is
live,
and
so
we
have
representatives
from
both
the
engineering
team
and
science
team,
so
ryan
and
sam
here
with
us
so
yeah
it
should
be
an
interesting
conversation.
So
I'll
do
my
best
to
kind
of
guide
us
through
with
questions.
A
If
folks
have
questions,
you
know,
please
feel
free
to
just
you
know,
raise
your
hand
or
I'll
also
sort
of
be
monitoring,
my
twitter.
So
if
you
want
to
like
you
know
at
me
or
something
there's
not
really
a
chat
room
in
here,
but
if
you,
if
you've
got
questions,
you
know,
feel
free
to
sort
of
ping
me
and
I'll
try
to
monitor
things
and
yeah,
we'll
kind
of
we'll
kind
of
rock
from
there.
One
thing
I'd
encourage
people
to
do
as
we're
walking
through
this.
You
could
go
through
doc.
A
You
could
go
to
docs.region.network
if
you're
on
your
computer
and
you'd
like
to
just
sort
of
like
have,
you
know,
have
stuff
up
there.
You
can
see
some
of
the
the
details
about
the
eco
credit,
module
overview,
etc
so
yeah
without
further
ado.
Let's
dig
in
maybe
I'll
start
with
just
having
ryan
and
sam
both.
If
you
guys
don't
mind
just
like
saying
hello
and
maybe
introducing
yourself
to
everybody.
B
Sounds
great
thanks,
gregory
yeah,
my
name
is
ryan.
I
work
on
regen
ledger
as
software
developer
and
developer
relations
and
yeah.
I
helped
lead
a
deep
dive
recently
on
the
ecocredit
module
with
sam
and
corey,
and
put
together
a
blog
post
that
overviews
the
equal
credit
module,
as
gregory
mentioned,
checking
out
the
docs
while
we're
going
through.
This
would
be
really
helpful,
but
also
a
quick
summary.
B
If
you
want
to
have
something
else
in
front
of
you,
but
yeah
here
to
answer
any
questions
about
the
implementation
on
the
technical
side,
where
the
eco
credit
module
is
going
in
the
future
and
where
it's
at
today
and
happy
to
be
here.
C
Cool
thanks
yeah,
my
name
is
sam
bennetts.
I
work
with
the
science
and
registry
programs
at
regen
have
a
background
in
software
development
as
well
as
more
applied
sciences
within
kind
of
the
remote
sensing
sphere,
so
kind
of
coming
at
this.
From
a
perspective
of
you
know,
what
are
the
technical
implementations
of
the
eco-credit
module
and
what
are
the
use
cases?
How
can
it
actually
be
used?
C
You
know
a
lot
of
my
work
with
the
registry
program
is
working
with
methodology
developers,
project
developers
that
have
projects
that
are
ready
to
use
the
eco
credit
module.
So
I'm
thinking
through
like
how
do
we
use
the
metadata
field
like
when?
Does
it
make
sense
to
merge
credit
classes
versus
create
new
credit
classes,
so
excited
to
share
my
perspective
and
answer
any
questions
you
guys
have.
A
Rock
on
well,
so,
let's
just
let's
just
start
at
a
high
level:
what
what
does
the
eco
credit
module
do
like
who's
going
to
use
it,
and
what
does
it
do?
Ryan?
You
want
to
just
give
us
a
quick
summary
of
that.
B
Sure
yeah,
the
initial
implementation
of
the
eco
credit
module
is
focused
on
creating
credit
classes,
which
is
essentially
the
primary
abstraction
for
an
ecosystem
service
credit.
And
when
you
create
a
credit
class,
you
have
an
admin
and
issuers.
The
admin
manages
basically
the
information
about
the
credit
class
and
the
issuers
are
allowed
to
issue
credit
batches
and
so
in
this
initial
implementation.
B
We
have
these
credit
classes,
these
that
support
the
issuance
of
credit
batches
and
then,
once
those
credits
are
issued
in
the
form
of
a
credit
batch,
they
are
tradable
or
they
can
be
retired
or
they
can
be
cancelled,
and
that
is
the
initial
focus
in
terms
of
our
implementation
is
providing
the
support
for
these
ecosystem
service
credits
to
be
created,
to
be
issued
to
be
tradable
and
retired,
and
in
terms
of
who
would
be
using
this.
B
Maybe
that
would
actually
be
something
sam
could
pop
in
here
and
provide
a
little
bit
of
context
on.
C
Yeah
totally
yeah.
To
me
I
mean
the
the
big
thing
about
the
eco
credit
module.
Is
it's
really
the
first
step
towards
decentralized
governance
of
like
who
manages
carbon
credit,
who
manages
eco
credits
in
a
more
traditional
sense?
If
you
look
at
like
vera
or
gold
standard,
they
are
the
sole
issuers
of
any
vcus
coming
out
of
their
ecosystem,
so
any
methodology,
whether
it's
a
forestry
methodology,
a
grasslands
methodology.
C
It
goes
through
their
program
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
they're
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
issuing
these
credits
with
the
eco
credit
module,
we're
allowing
people
to
set
credit
class
administrators
to
set
credit
class
issuers.
So
you
know
if
someone
develops
their
own
program,
that's
focused
on.
Let's
say
you
know
agroforestry
projects
in
germany,
they
can
come
in
and
they
can
create,
create
a
credit
class.
They
can
set
the
administrator
to
be
someone
within
that
program,
and
the
issue
is
to
be.
C
You
know,
like
let's
say
the
the
people
helping
manage
and
run
that
program.
Representing
those
you
know,
german
farmers
working
agroforestry
projects.
So
we're
really.
You
know,
while
we're
starting
with
a
permissioned
approach
where
people
are
getting
voted
in
for
credit
class
creators,
this
kind
of
first
step
towards
digitizing
and
creating
a
web3
style
of
eco
credit
creation
and
management.
A
Yeah
awesome,
so
so,
let's
just
take
a
step
back
and
talk
more
about
like
where
things
are
at
now
and
where
we
want
them
to
be
so
sam.
You
were
just
mentioning.
You
know
one
eco
credit
like
right.
Now,
eco
credit
module
is
live
at
the
moment.
C
Yep
so
right
now
we
started
with
permission
to
print
so
enable
to
become
a
credit
class
creator
and
create
new
credit
classes,
said
administrators,
so
on
and
so
forth.
You
have
to
get
voted
in
via
governance
proposal,
and
so
the
first
step
is
for
us
at
least
on
on
the
registry
team.
Is
we're
currently
writing
a
proposal
which
hopefully
will
release
sometime
in
the
next
week
on
becoming
the
first
credit
class
creator
within
the
ecosystem.
C
B
Yeah,
just
a
little
bit
of
clarification
there.
The
credit
class
creator
allow
list
is
the
ability
to
create
credit
classes,
so
the
administrators
of
a
credit
class
like
sam
was
mentioning
you.
We
could
create
essentially
a
credit
class
on
behalf
of
r
d
and
assign
the
administrator
to
another
person
that
would
manage
that
credit
class
and
so
there's
multiple
opportunities
within
the
region
registry
program
to
at
different
levels
in
terms
of
governing
a
credit
class,
whether
that's
becoming
an
administrator
or
becoming
an
issuer.
B
But
this
a
permissioned
approach
that
is
a
loose
term
on
permission,
but
it
essentially
is
to
have
the
ability
to
submit
transactions
that
include
messages
that
create
credit
classes.
So
this
is
also
it's
worth
noting
that
this
is
also
meant
to
be
a
temporary
feature
in
the
future.
The
ideas
that
will
have
anyone
be
able
to
create
credit
classes
on
chain,
and
so
this
initial
implementation
was
mostly
focused
on
being
permissioned.
B
Due
to
the
fact
that
we
wanted
to
ensure
that
people
that
are
creating
credit
classes
on
chain
are
going
to
be
willing
to
do
some
data
migrations
when
the
time
comes,
because
there
are
improvements
that
were
planned
for
the
eco-credit
module
that
are
being
implemented
now
in
terms
of
supporting
different
project
types,
and
that
will
require
some
migration
in
terms
of
data
when
we
upgrade
to
the
next
version
of
regen
ledger.
B
So
we
wanted
to
ensure
one
that
the
the
network
was
gonna,
be
aligned
with
this
permissioned
approach
and
that
there
were
beginning
people
that
were
creating
credit
classes
would
be
willing
to
work
with
the
community
and
our
engineering
team
on
the
migration
of
some
data
but
yeah.
So
this
initial
permission
approach
is
something
that
we're
planning
to
keep
for
the
time
being,
and
it
could
be
voted
out.
B
It's
basically
a
parameter
that
can
be
voted
upon
if
we
want
to
change
to
a
non-permissioned
approach
where
anyone
can
create
credit
classes-
and
that
is
part
of
the
plan
in
the
future.
So
yeah.
A
Awesome
and
let's
talk
a
little
bit
now
about
the
sort
of
vision,
maybe
sam,
if
you
want
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
vision
of
region
registry
as
the
first
sort
of
blockchain,
enabled
decentralized
ecological
asset
registry
system
and
how
that's
sort
of
relating
you.
You
were
alluding
to
that.
But
I
think
just
you
know,
diving
in
a
little
bit
deeper
would
be
super
helpful.
C
C
A
lot
of
people
that
we're
working
with
are
not
coming
from
a
web3
background
so
like
in,
in
order
to
upgrade
their
technical
literacy
and
ability
to
interact
like
like
to
use
the
eco
credit.
Module
is
going
to
take
some
time,
but
we
have
a
few
people
that
are
kind
of
ahead
of
the
game
and
super
excited
to
do
that
and
you
know
for
for
each
program,
that's
being
or
each
methodology
and
type
of
credit
that's
coming
into
our
ecosystem.
C
Does
it
make
sense,
for
you
know,
like
myself,
working
within
the
regent
registry
program
to
be
overseeing
the
issuance
of
you
know
amazonian
forestry
credits
for
like
the
seco
pai
yokun
people
like
not
really,
you
know
the
people
that
should
be
involved
in
that
process
should
be
the
ones
that
are
you
know,
working
with
the
community
members
like
actually
visiting
the
site,
you
know
helping
develop
the
monitoring
reports,
and
so,
as
we
bring
people
into
our
ecosystem,
you
know
the
first
thing
that
I
do
is
I
just
help
to
assess
like
their
willingness
to
take
agency
over
credit
kind
of
the
credit
class
management.
C
So
you
know
of
the
15
or
so
pilot
projects
that
we
have
that
are
going
to
result
in
credit
classes.
You
know
picking
five,
that
we
would
create
the
credit
class
for
them
and
then
set
them
as
the
administrator
and
then
every
time
they
have
a
new
project.
That's
registered,
you
know,
through
regen
registry
they
would
be
in
charge
of
the
ones
managing
the
issuance
list,
minting
new
batches
of
credits
and
kind
of
decentralizing
out
that
process.
C
So
I
don't
know
gregory
if
that
answers
your
question,
but
when
I
think
of
you
know,
first
steps
towards
decentralized
registry
program.
That's
what
I
think
is.
A
A
So
I'm
happy
to
speak
to
that,
and
then
maybe
you
know,
ryan
and
sam,
if
you
guys
want
to
add
any
color
to
that,
you
can
so
retirement
is
when
an
address
someone
is
coming,
purchasing
a
credit
and
then
choosing
to
retire.
That
which
is
the
use
of
a
carbon
credit
which
is
to
offset
emissions
right,
so
they
get
a
certificate
of
retirement
and
it's
retired,
and
it's
no
longer
tradable,
but
it
can
be
accounted
on.
A
The
corporate
balance
sheet
or
the
you
know,
jurisdictional
sort
of
like
nested
accounting
system
for
this
unit
of
carbon
has
been
retired
cancelled,
is,
is
the
the
primary
use
case
we
designed
that
for
is
if
a
credit
is
moving
off
chain,
for
instance
like
if
a
credit
is
being
taken
off
of
regent,
ledger
and
put
it
put
back
into
a
traditional
sort
of
like
vera
or
gold
standard
registry
system,
or
I
think
it's
also
likely
to
be
used.
A
If
credits
are
shown
to
be
faulty,
they
could
be
cancelled
and
then
they're
not
going
to
be
retired
or
tradable
at
that
stage.
So
that's
the
difference
there,
between
retirement
and
cancellation
as
a
feature.
B
Again,
maybe
just
to
add
from
the
technical
side
of
things,
credits
can
be
retired
upon
the
issuance
of
credits.
So
when
a
credit
batch
is
issued,
you
can
specify
a
certain
amount
of
credits
that
are
tradable
or
retire.
C
B
And
currently
we're
working
on
the
implementation.
This
might
be
getting
a
little
ahead,
but
we're
working
on
the
implementation
of
like
an
order
book
model,
so
credits
will
be
also
be
able
to
be
retired,
upon
purchase
of
credits.
So
yeah
is
there
anything
that
sam,
you
might
want
to
add
about
retirement
or
canceling.
C
No,
I
we,
we
lost
you
for
a
second
there,
but
I
mean
essentially,
you
were
just
saying
that
upon
issuance
credits
can
be
issued
into
retired
state
or
an
unretired
state,
and
then,
like
you
said,
you
know,
once
we
in
the
future
implement
order
books.
We
can
also
retire
on
purchase.
B
A
So
one
of
the
concepts
that
sam
has
been
talking
about
is
just
you
know
the
vision
of
a
world
in
which
you
know
many
different
people
can
participate
in
defining
a
credit
class
and
and
start
minting
ecosystem
service
credits,
and
we
can
ask
well,
I
think
we
should
talk
about.
Why
is
that
important?
A
little
bit
more?
We
should
also
talk
about
how
do
we,
how
in
the
in
this
sort
of
like
vision,
how
are
we
ensuring
quality
and
accountability?
A
Alongside
that
openness?
I
think
that's
probably
a
pretty
good
topic
of
conversation
to
to
dig
into
as
we're
moving
forward.
Some
of
this
starts
to
get
into
what
does
regen
3.0
look
like,
but
I
think
I
think
it
illustrates
why
we've
made
decisions
the
way
we've
made
them
and
like
what
our
theory
of
change
is
here,
so
maybe
I'll
take
a
quick
crack
and
then
pass
it
to
each
of
you
to
just
sort
of
comment
on
so
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
pieces.
A
Many
of
you
may
know
we
have
a
science
team
that
has
worked
to
sort
of
build
soup
to
nuts
different
verification
systems
from
sort
of
grassland
carbon
plus,
which
is
a
soil
regeneration
based
or
carbon
credit
for
carbon
removals
to
practice
based
pieces
to
supporting
people
doing
a
variety
of
different
things
from
agroforestry
forestry,
mangrove
other
things
that
have
been
happening
and
one
of
the
things
from
our
perspective,
that's
really
important
to
understand
is
there
are
not
all
carbon
is,
is
equal,
so
you
have
this
diversity
when
we're
talking
about
living
carbon
carbon
coming
from
landscapes.
A
Also,
there's
the
need
to
rapidly
scale
and
expand
carbon
removal
options
much
more
quickly
than
centralized
bureaucratic
registry
systems
have
been
up
until
now,
capable
of
shouldering
so
those
are
sort
of
like
two
major
issues.
On
the
other
hand,
how
do
we
ensure
quality-
and
I
think
the
essential
theory
here
is
step?
One
obviously
is
everybody.
Who's
been
listening
and
seeing
there's
like
a
measured
approach.
A
Many
more
people
can
participate
in
engaging
and
innovating.
So
with
that
sort
of
as
a
tee
up,
maybe
I'll
pass
it
to
you
sam
and
see.
If
there's
anything
you
any
color
that
you'd
like
to
add
to
that
or
elements
that
I
missed,
or
that
you'd
like
to
upgrade.
C
No,
I
mean,
I
think,
like
at
a
high
level,
you
really
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
with
a
lot
of
it
and
I,
I
think,
just
as
a
whole,
it's
there's
so
many
elements,
and
so
many
lane,
like
things
we
could
talk
about
within
the
context
of
you,
know
our
theory
of
change
and
what
we're
trying
to
build
and
it's
a
super,
complicated
system.
C
But
one
thing
that
really
stood
out
to
me
is
just
like
the
the
ability
to
rapidly
scale
and
engage
people
and
provide
the
ability
to
people
to
to
start
in
like
implementing
nature-based
solutions.
You
know
like
we
within
the
you
know
more
traditional
registry
systems,
which
are
doing
really
great
work.
C
The
unfortunate
limitation
is,
there
are
financial
barriers
to
entry
like
the
programmatic
requirements
by
some
of
these
more
traditional
registries,
just
like
really
make
it
difficult
for
people
to
quickly
start
adopting
regenerative
practices
and
get
paid
for
them,
and
you
know
like
our
our
theory
of
change,
is
just
like.
We
want
to
rapidly
scale
this.
We
want
to
engage
science
communities
like
a
lot
of
like
my
work
within
you
know.
C
The
the
science
program
is
like
how
can
we
bridge
the
gap
between
the
academic
community
and
the
applied
sciences
so
that
we're
rapidly
iterating
on
like
like
how
are
these
regenerative
practices
affecting
our
landscape?
And
you
know,
in
kind
of
connecting
all
the
key
players
and
in
lending
towards
this
decentralized
approach,
where
it's
not
a
single
framework,
we're
trying
to
adopt
and
work
around.
It
allows
just
a
lot
more
people
to
adopt
practices
that
we
know
are
good
for
the
ecosystems
a
lot
more
quickly.
A
Awesome
so
we
we
started
to
just
you
touched
on
it
a
little
bit.
B
A
A
moment
ago-
and
I
know
you
know,
there's
always
this
tension-
be
forward-looking
between
engineering
and
product
specification
and
the
emerging
market,
and
we're
really,
you
know,
I
think,
tend
to
to
not
want
to
make
promises
that
we're
not
going
to
keep.
So
everybody
should
keep
that
in
mind.
But
I
I'd
love,
if
you
would
mind,
sharing
a
little
bit
on
what's
on
the
horizon,
for
new
modules
that
are
going
to
be
interacting
with
the
eco
credit,
module
and
and
sort
of
just
what's
emerging
for
regen
ledger
3.0.
B
Yeah,
no,
I
would
love
to
go
into
that.
As
some
of
you
probably
are
aware
a
lot
one
of
the
modules
that
the
region
ledger,
team
or
region
network
team
has
been
working
on
for
some
time
is
a
group
module,
and
this
is
allows
for
weighted
voting
and
cr
like
the
foundation
for
dao
and
essentially
in
combination
with
the
eco
credit
module.
B
So,
rather
than
having
an
address
listed
as
an
admin,
that's
owned
by
a
single
user,
you
could
have
that
address,
be
a
group
account
or
a
multi-cig
account,
and
essentially
when
the
group
module
is
available,
then
that
credit
class
becomes
governed
by
a
body
of
people
rather
than
an
individual,
and
so
that's
one
exciting
use
case
of
the
group
module
alongside
the
eco-credit
module.
B
Another
feature
that
we're
working
on
is
the
implementation
of
this
marketplace:
functionality
we're
currently
building
out
an
order
books
model
essentially
allowing
for
people
to
list
and
buy
eco
credits,
and
that's
something
that
I'm
actually
working
on
implementing
and
we
should
be.
We
should
be
seeing
that
one
in
v3,
the
initial
implementation,
will
support
the
direct
buy
orders.
So
essentially
you
can
directly
buy
and
ego.
You
can
directly
buy
credits
from
a
listed
cell
order
and
then
we're
also
planning
on
implementing
a
filter
option.
B
So
you
could
essentially
define
a
filter
criteria
for
criteria
that
you
would
use
to
buy
credits
and
it
would
find
those
credits
that
are
aligned
with
that
filter
criteria.
That's
something
that
might
be
held
off
until
the
next
version
and
then
we're
also
looking
into
a
basket
functionality.
And
this
is
something
that's
kind
of
been
going
back
and
forth
between
product
and
engineering.
B
As
gregory
mentioned
that
this
is
something
that
we
we
can't
quite
promise
in
the
next
version,
but
we
are
working
on
it
and
we
hope
to
see
it
land
in
the
next
version,
but
essentially
supporting
the
ability
to
create
baskets
of
credits
and
yeah.
I
I
don't
in
terms
of
the
functionality
and
the
implementation,
I
I
guess
I'm
going
to
hold
off
on
saying
too
much,
because
it
is
something
that's
currently
being
designed
in
the
by
our
product
team.
But
these
are
a
few
of
the
features
that
we're
looking
at
in
implementing.
B
Another
thing
that
I
mentioned
earlier
was
the
support
for
projects
within
the
eagle
credit
module
so
essentially
being
able
to
define
a
project
associated
with
a
credit
class,
and
that's
something
that
came
out
of
requests
from
the
registry
side
of
things.
So
maybe,
if
there's
any
additional
comments
that
sam
would
like
to
provide
on
that,
but
there's
yeah
these.
These
are
several
different
things.
B
The
things
that
are
that
you
probably
can
expect
to
land
in
the
next
version
would
be
like
a
an
initial
implementation
of
this
marketplace.
Functionality
for
being
able
to
list
and
buy
list,
buy
and
sell
orders
for
eco
credits.
A
And
the
mdow
sort
of
like
the
the
first
step
step
of
dow
functionality
with
the
groups
module
right.
B
Correct
so
the
groups
module
is
actually
something
that
we
built
on
the
regen
ledger
side
of
things
and
then
we're
now
implementing
within
the
cosmos
sdk,
because
the
cosmos
community
thought
that
this
would
be
a
good
module
to
have
as
a
standard
module
within
the
sdk
library.
B
So
it's
currently
being
transferred
over
to
the
sdk
and
then
that
will
be
included
within
the
next
release
of
the
sdk.
And
then
the
next
release
of
regen
ledger
will
upgrade
to
that
latest
version
of
the
cosmos
sdk,
so
that
the
group
module
will
be
available
within
regen
ledger
to
use
alongside
the
group.
The
eco
credit
module,
yeah.
A
Fantastic,
so
maybe
it's
worth
just
talking
a
little
bit
more.
I
know.
There's
a
bunch
of
listeners
out
there
who
are
are
really
stoked
and
hyped
on
sort
of
dao
as
a
social
crows
of
social
coordination
tools,
and
you
know,
I
wonder
if,
if
you
don't
mind
ryan,
just
giving
a
little
bit
of
sort
of
like
what
does
the
group's
module
do?
A
How
maybe
is
it
different
from
some
of
the
ethereum
approaches
to
you
know
token-based
voting
and
you've
already
kind
of
indicated
how
it
interacts
with
the
with
the
eco-credit
module,
insofar
as
you
know,
we
can
create
essentially
credit
credit
classes
can
be
owned
by
a
community
of
people
through
through
use
of
the
groups
module,
so
there
can
be
sort
of
like
standards
bodies,
essentially
that
are
voting
on
credit
classes.
But
if
you
don't
mind
just
like
doing
a
little
bit
more
give
adding
a
little
bit
more
color
to
the
groups
module.
B
Yeah
I'll
do
my
best.
It's
not
something
I've
been
working
on
directly,
but
it
is
something
that
I
can
speak
on
the
so
essentially
with
the
group
module
it's
it's
weighted
voting,
so
there's
associated
weights
with
each
account
within
a
group
and
a
group,
a
member
of
a
group
will
have
an
associated
weight
and
so,
rather
than
this
token
token
weighted
model
that
we
usually
see
within
the
space.
There
is
the
opportunity
to
set
these
weights
within
a
group,
and
each
group
has
an
administrator.
B
So
the
administrator
has
the
ability
to
add,
remove
and
update
members
in
the
group,
which
could
be
another
group.
B
If,
if
you
could
see
that
miss
on
a
beam
kind
of
affect
a
group
within
a
group
within
a
group
but
yeah,
an
administrator
would
have
the
ability
to
add
or
move
and
update
members
in
a
group
and
and
yeah
in
terms
of
creating
decision
policies.
It's
a.
B
B
There
is
no
dow
token
associated
with
the
group
module
within
the
group
module
design,
but
it
is
something
that
you
could.
You
could
create
an
integration
alongside
that.
If
you
wanted
to
have
a
dial
token
that
was
managed
by
the
group,
then
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
available,
but
this
is
extracts
the
need
for
the
group
to
be
dependent
on
the
token
right.
A
A
Wow,
I
would
really
love
to
get
like
dao
coordination
and
engagement
with
people,
but
there
may
be
tax
implica.
Implications
of
you
know
like
launching
this
dow
token,
et
cetera,
et
cetera
the
cool
thing
of
sort
of
like
abstracting
out,
there's
no
real
need
for
a
token
to
give
different
addresses
voting
power
over
something.
So
anyway,
there's
like
a
nice
function
here,
where
you
can
add
that
in,
if
you
like
to
but
stripping
that
away
and
allowing
people
to
just
have
pure
governance,
I
think
actually
is
I'm
pretty
refreshed
by
those
design
decisions.
B
Yeah,
no,
it's
it's
exciting!
There's
a
lot
of
people
within
the
cosmos
ecosystem
are
really
excited
about
the
group
module
and
we're
really
happy
to
have
it
been
accepted
into
the
cosmos
sdk
as
a
standard
module
and
to
see
it.
Land
in
the
next
release
will
be
a
huge
milestone
and
really
great
feature
to
incorporate,
alongside
the
eco
credit
module
and
just
anyone,
who's
looking
to
create
a
dao
on
regen,
ledger
or
in
in
relation
to
managing
a
credit
class
or
for
other
purposes
as
well.
B
They'll
be
able
to
start
experimenting
with
that
here
soon.
So
there
is,
there
is
the
ability
to
experiment
with
the
group
module
if
you're
interested
currently
on
our
experimental
test
network,
it's
hombok
test
network
and
that
has
the
beta
implementation
of
the
group
module
that
the
region
ledger
team
built
within
the
region.
Ledger
repository
and
we've
stopped
working
on
that
version
and
started
working
on
porting
it
over
to
the
sdk.
But
there
is
an
initial
implementation.
B
That's
available
there
and,
if
you're
interested
in
like
more
information
about
the
group
module,
we
do
have
documentation
on
the
group
module
on
that
same
docs.regen.network
website
that
we
provided
here
at
the
beginning
and
that
will
provide
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
decision
policies
and
the
proposal
process
and
voting
for
the
group
module.
If
you're
interested.
A
You
know
just
to
sort
of
like
paint
a
picture
of
how
this
technology
is
going
to
allow
you
all
to
engage
in
kind
of
a
community
governed
carbon
registry
and
marketplace
so
step
number
one
is
if
you're
developing
a
carbon
removal
project
or
avoided
emissions
product
project,
that's
based
on
living
systems
on
living
carbon,
you
can
be
engaging
with
our
really
fantastic
science
team,
which
sam
is
a
representative
of
and
working
to
bring
a
like
to
create
a
credit
class
that
you
know
if
you
would
like
you
can
either
work
directly
with
r
d,
and
we
can
create
that
credit
class
on
your
behalf,
pending
the
acceptance
of
the
rest
of
our
community
in
our
proposal.
A
To
do
that,
you
can
work
with
us
and
we
can
help
make
you
an
admin
of
that
or
you
can
apply
directly
to
the
community
to
have
full
sort
of
sovereignty
over
that
system
depending
on
your
sort
of
technical
capability,
and
you
can
build
a
community
around
that
credit
class
so
that
there
is
essentially
a
body
that
is
helping
you
govern
it,
the
attributes
of
it,
the
issuers
of
it
etc.
A
So,
just
to
sort
of
like
try
to
land
that
plane
in
and
how
we're
seeing
commun
this
be
really
sort
of
owned
and
operated
by
the
community.
A
I'd
love,
you
know,
I'd
love
to
just
do
a
sort
of
circle
around
and
sam
I'd
love
it.
If
you
would
give
people
some
insight
into
some
of
the
most.
You
know
like
what
are
you
excited
about
right
now
you
get
to
interact
with
project
developers
and
scientists
doing
you
know
really
cool
work
all
around
the
world.
Do
you
want
to
just
give
people
a
little
snapshot
of
some
of
the
coolest
things
that
you're
seeing
and
what
you're?
What
you're
amped
about.
C
Yeah,
definitely,
let's
see
okay,
so
I
I
think
that
there
are
a
few
things,
so
you
know
just
for
those
of
you
who
are
less
familiar
with
like
what
the
regen
registry
program
does
is.
Is
we're
really
focused
on
a
like
the
entirety
of
nature-based
solutions,
so
we're
not
just
focused
on
carbon.
C
We're
focused
on
methodologies
that
improve
water
quality,
biodiversity,
fire
resilience,
soil
health,
and
so
you
know,
with
that
in
mind,
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
really
cool
proposals
for
both
carbon
methodologies,
but
other
types
of
credits
as
well,
and
one
that
I
was
really
excited
to
kind
of
share
that
I
heard
about
earlier
this
week.
Was
this
idea
of
creating
a
biodiversity
credit
for
big
cats
down
in
the
protection
of
big
cats
like
jaguars
down
in
brazil
and
ecuador?
C
For
you
know
the
funding
of
which
would
go
to
the
protection
of
not
only
the
big
cats,
but
just
the
rainforest
and
ecosystem
they
live
in
and
it
would
be
based
off
of
different
tiers
of
data.
So
you
might
have
you
know
three
different
credit
classes,
I'm
not
sure
how
they're
going
to
do
it,
but
like
for
like
a
bronze
silver
and
gold
and
gold
being
like
you
know,
you
have
lots
of
data
in
that
area.
You
have
camera
traps.
C
You're
measuring
you
know
all
these
species,
both
flora
and
fauna,
that
are
present
within
that
ecosystem
and
there's
a
lot
of
assurance
around
the
presence
of
a
jaguar
and
in
their
impact
on
the
kind
of
ecosystem.
And
then
you
know,
bronze
would
be
like.
You
generally
know
that
they're
there
you
might
have
like
a
a
few
data
points.
You
might
have
one
of
them
tracked
and
so
you're.
C
You
know
you're
kind
of
addressing
the
level
of
rigor
with
the
amount
of
data
that
you're
providing,
and
I
just
thought
that
that
was
a
really
cool
non-carbon
focus
project
in
terms
of
the
carbon
focus
ones.
I
mean
we're
working
with
like
blue
carbon
projects
in
the
venetian
province.
There's
you
know
mangrove
like
projects
down
in
ghana
and
mexico.
C
A
Was
the
latest?
What
was
the
latest
count
of
you
know
how
many.
C
I
would
say
around
10
000
hectares,
but
we've
been
in
active
conversation
with
a
few
groups
that
would
be
bringing
in
like
a
hundred
thousand
hectares
to
the
grasslands
program,
which
is
is
huge
and
there's.
Actually,
this
really
cool
group
called
sequest.ai,
that's
based
in
berlin
that
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
studying
remote
sensing
of
soil,
carbon,
and
so
it's
been
really
excited
to
just
partner
with
them
and
and
talk
with
them
and
kind
of
bounce
ideas
about
the
science
that
goes
into
the
methodology,
and
you
know
I.
A
While,
while
you're
on
that,
I
mean
you're
at
the
nexus
of
a
pretty
large
collaborative
open
source
science
community
that
that
we've
been
convening
and
participating
in,
you
know
between
open
team
and
and
the
earthshot
community
and
open
earth
foundation
and
and
and
many
others,
and
I'm
curious
if
you
just
want
to
you,
know
like
if,
if
people
are
stoked
on
the
science
side,
where
would
they
go
to
engage
with
you
and
this,
like
large,
growing
science
team?
Would
that
be
on
regions
discord?
A
You
know
where,
where
do
people
engage
if
they're
geeky
on
earth
observation,
science
and
and
eco-credit
verification,
yeah.
C
That's
a
good
question,
I
mean
I
I
would
say,
like
you
know,
first
one
is
our
discord.
I
think
that
discord
just
lends
itself
as
a
little
bit
less
used
program
within
the
science
community
at
large,
at
least
just
you
know
from
my
background,
like
my
first
exposure
to
discord
outside
of
just
a
gaming
environment
was
regen
network,
and
I
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
scientists
that
don't
really
use
it.
C
So
it'd
be
awesome
to
get
more
science
engagement
on
our
discord,
but
you
know
either
that
or
reaching
out
directly
to
someone
on
our
science
team.
If
you
have
a
specific
idea
for
a
project
or
or
you
want
to
contribute
specifically
to
something,
but
then
yeah
like
the
the
earthshot
community,
is
doing
some
really
cool
work
with
machine
learning
and
remote
sensing,
so
creating
data
data
products
that
you
know
have
everything
from
above
ground.
Biomass
estimates
to
like
the
impacts
of
beaver
dams
on
riparian
ecosystems.
C
So
you
know
for
the
eco
credit
module
like
hop
on
discord.
We're
really
looking
for
people
to
engage,
and
also
one
thing
that
you
know
I'm
really
focused
on
is
trying
to
connect
our
methodology
developers
with
the
larger
science
community
and
we're
really
pushing
for
this
idea
of
an
open,
open
source
methodology
approach.
So
you
know,
within
in
q1
and
hopefully,
in
january,
we'll
start
to
see
a
lot
more
proposals
to
the
community
of
like
hey.
We
got
this
concept
note
for
a
methodology.
C
We've
got,
we
want
to
work
on
it.
You
know
these
are
our
needs.
We
need
research
in
this
area.
We
need
software
development
help
here
so
yeah.
A
Awesome
super
cool
right,
so,
let's
zoom
back
out
again
it
was
an
awesome,
deep
dive
into
a
little
bit
about
what's
happening
in
the
science
side.
You
know
kind
of
like
what
goes
into
an
eco
credit
and
a
lot
of
that
that
experience
that
that
the
the
r
d
inc
team
had
bringing
carbon
plus
grasslands
to
market
and
selling
it
to
microsoft,
parlayed
into
how
we've
structured
the
eco
credit
module
I'd
love.
You
know,
while
we're
on
the
sort
of
like
data
side
of
things
a
little
bit.
Maybe
it's
worthwhile!
A
I
don't
know
this
is
kind
of
putting
you
on
the
spot
ryan
and
you
know
I
know,
there's
a
bit
of
complexity
here,
but
would
you
feel
comfortable
chatting
a
little
bit
about
the
data
module
and,
like
you
know,
on
off
chain
data?
You
know
rdf
approach
and
just
like
what
what's
happening
there
and
how
that's
going
to
be
interacting
with
eco
data,
mod,
the
eco
data,
module
and
sort
of
enabling
project
developers
and
sort
of
creating
efficiency
in
the
verification
process,
or
is
that
maybe
putting
you
on
the
spot
too
much.
B
I
would
say
maybe
a
little
bit,
but
on
the
spot,
in
terms
of
my
my
knowledge
is,
is
somewhat
limited.
I
do
know
that
we
are
planning
on,
including
essentially
this
bare
bones
version
of
the
data
module
in
the
next
release
as
well.
We've
we've
implemented,
we
finished
making
changes
to
an
initial
beta
version
that
was
available
on
our
test
network
and
this
this
version
is
going
to
be
focused
on
just
anchoring
and
signing
data,
so
essentially
yeah.
B
As
you
mentioned,
we
are
supporting
rdf
data
as
well
as
other
data,
and
signing
data
will
only
be
available
for
signing
rdf
data
types
on
chain,
but
yeah.
In
terms
of
my
knowledge,
I
don't
know
how
much
more
I
can
speak
on
that,
but
it
is
something
that,
if
you
are
interested
in
learning
more
about
the
data
module,
we
do,
we
do
have
yeah
it.
B
Initial
version
available
on
hombock
and
people
that
are
working
on
the
dojo
module
more
closely
would
be
happy
to
answer
questions
in
discord
and
we
do
have
people
who
recently
applied
for
a
grant
that
are
going
to
be
working
a
little
bit
more
on
the
data
module
in
the
coming
year
as
well
and
helping
build
out
a
user
interface
for
that.
But
I
think
yeah.
C
I
I
can
just
like
hop
in
on.
Unless
of
the
you
know,
technical
side
of
like
how
are
we
gonna
use
the
data
module
and,
and
what's
the
implementation
look
like,
but
you
know
from
a
science
perspective,
a
lot
of
what
we're
lacking
within
the
ecosystem
is
just
centralized
warehouses
for
data
and
data
sharing
between
different.
You
know
academic
institutions,
farms
things
like
that.
That
would
really
help
to
accelerate
the
rate
at
which
we
can
understand
ecosystems,
and
one
really
good
example
is
like
soil.
Carbon
like
soil.
C
Carbon
is
an
extremely
difficult
thing
for
us
to
understand,
because
you
literally
have
to
go,
dig
it
up
to
be
able
to
measure
it,
and
so
you
know
one
thing
with
the
data
module
is
like
it
like.
Even
like
you
know,
pre
like
it's
really
important
that
we
get
a
lot
of
this
data
on
our
ecosystem
in
a
centralized
way.
C
You
know
both
to
help
validate
and
provide
transparency
around
claims
for
ecological
state,
but
also
just
to
accelerate
the
science
and-
and
so
you
know,
would
be
really
excited
to
see
more
use
cases
and
engagement
on
you
know,
data
sharing
and,
and
you
know,
kind
of
helping
lean
in
a
little
bit
more
there
from
the
community.
So
if
you
guys
have
ideas,
start
start
chatting
discord.
C
A
Work,
I
mean
we're
part
of
the
open
team
community,
there's
a
lot
of
work
happening
and-
and
there
are
some
of
the
folks
who
are
going
to
be
working
on
data
module,
integrations
rsi
from
os
and
our
great
cambium
validator
running
on
regen.
So
they're
going
to
be
digging
into
all
of
that.
A
Integrating
I
mean,
I
think,
the
vision
there
is
to
be
able
to
integrate
farm
farmer
management
software
in
which
data
is
sort
of
like
collected
in
real
time
with
eco
credit
verification
systems
and
and
sort
of
remote
remote
sensing
things
just
to
give
people
sort
of
like
the
high
level
vision
here
and
what
sam's
talking
about,
where
there's
sort
of
the
ability
for
people
to
engage
in
the
data
economy
in
support
of
the
economy.
A
You
know
the
emerging
carbon
and
ecosystem
service
economies,
where
really
the
the
cost
to
to
mint
a
high
quality
carbon
credit
can
be
driven
down
significantly
by
sort
of
leveraging
and
building
out
these.
These
toolkits
for
folks
to
engage
with
so
another
piece
that
I'd
like
to
sort
of
zoom
around
on
before
we
go
is
actually
to
just
kind
of.
A
It's
a
very
different
developer
paradigm
than
like
an
arbitrary
smart
contracting
approach
that
many
people
may
be
more
familiar
with
with
evm
or
other
systems,
and
you've
done
a
fair
amount
of
development
across
the
web3
space.
And
I'm
curious,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
just
sharing
briefly
about
yeah,
just
like
how
the
developer
experience
differs,
working
on
regen
ledger
or
maybe
the
broader
cosmos,
sdk.
B
Sure
yeah
so
with
with
with
regen
ledger,
essentially
it
being
built
on
top
of
cosmos
sdk,
as
this
application
specific
blockchain.
B
That
is
that
our
team
has
built-
and,
like
I
mentioned
with
the
group
module,
we
originally
were
planning
on
that
being
a
custom
module
that
it's
being
ported
over
the
sdk
module,
sdk
repository
and
when
you're
thinking
about
modules,
essentially
you're
thinking
about
these
independent
state
machines,
and
so
each
module
has
its
own
state
and
it
has
its
own
set
of
transaction
messages
and
query
methods.
B
And
essentially,
these
are
compartmentalized
independent
little
state
machines
that
you
can
plug
into
this
larger
application
that
we're
calling
regen
ledger
is
our
blockchain
application
and
within
the
context
of
like
maybe
thinking
about
ethereum
versus
developing
within
the
cosmos
ecosystem.
B
Your
these
modules
are
essentially
what
would
replace
a
smart
contract
if
you
were
having
a
very
elaborate
set
of
smart
contracts
that
were
managing
a
dao,
essentially
that
functionality
would
be
replaced
with
this
module
in
the
cosmos
ecosystem
world
and
then
there's
also
the
opportunity
to
develop
with
smart
contracts
through
modules
such
as
like
the
implementation
of
cosmos
and
which,
essentially,
when
you're,
have
cosmos
implemented,
you
can
develop
with
using
rust
contracts,
so
the
the
ease
and
comfort
of
developing
within
the
cosmos
ecosystem
versus
developing
a
smart
contract.
B
B
But
once
you
get
involved
in
that
space,
then,
like
understanding
and
working
with
smart
contracts
is
relatively
easy,
but
within
the
cosmos,
ecosystem,
you're,
you're
you're,
using
a
a
language,
that's
already
been
used
widely
go,
laying
and
you're
developing
in
this
module
architecture
and
essentially
providing
all
that
functionality
and
using
other
modules,
as
templates
and
and
like
when
you're
developing
a
module
within
the
cosmos.
Sdk
repository
you're
using
protobuf
and
protobuf
basically
allows
you
to
define
your
api
in
a
proto
file,
and
then
you
can.
B
It
auto
generates
a
lot
of
the
functionality
for
you.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
code
that
is
being
auto
generated
for
you,
which
makes
development
within
development
of
modules
much
easier
as
well.
I
I
think
personally,
I
I
don't
really
have
like
a
favorite.
Necessarily
it's
been.
It's
been
really
great,
working
with
smart
contracts
in
the
ethereum
ecosystem,
as
well
as
with
modules
in
the
cosmos
ecosystem
and
then
seeing
the
combination
of
smart
contracts
landing
in
cosmos.
B
Ecosystem
with
cosmosome
is
something
I
haven't
quite
played
around
with
as
much
but
yeah
the
developer.
Experience
is
slightly
different
and
I
guess
yeah
does.
That
answer
your
question.
A
That's
that's
fantastic
and
I'll,
just
sort
of
like
end
by
saying
also
there's.
You
know
fast
finality
ethereum
virtual
machine
coming
soon
to
cosmos,
which
is
also
very
exciting,
so
you're
going
to
get
to
see
this,
like
really
wild
composability
start
to
happen,
but
I
think
that's
drifting,
a
little
further
field.
I
wanted
to
just
invite
kineshanko
up,
hey
man,
you
it's!
A
You
maybe
had
a
question
or
a
comment,
and
then
you
know,
maybe,
after
after
your
question,
comment
we'll
we'll
wrap
up,
I
know
there's
another
cool,
refi
room,
that's
going
to
be
kicking
off
here
shortly
and
probably
folks
have
other
things
to
do
so.
Yeah.
If
you
want
to
just
share
your
your
name,
your
question
comment.
We
can
answer
that
and
then
you
know
leap
into
the
rest
of
our
days.
D
Yeah,
hey
guys,
my
question
related
to
the
sort
of
oracle
verification
problem
you
guys
were
talking
about
before,
so
I
don't
want
to
flip
it
too
hard
back
to
that.
I
think
you
give
a
pretty
good
answer.
I
guess
my
question
is
so
I
worked
a
number
of
years
in
the
cdm
carbon
markets
back
in
the
day
before
they
died
and
what
we
always
had
to
do
when
we
were
installing
these
carbon
reduction
systems,
whether
it
was
like
a
anaerobic
biodigester
or
whatever
was
pay.
D
These
super
expensive
verification
companies
to
come
in
and
validate
that
our
protocol
math
was
correct
and
that
they
thought
the
systems
we
had
in
place.
You
know
to
guarantee
that
the
amount
of
carbon
we
said
was
going
to
be
reduced,
actually
stayed
reduced
over
years
and
stuff,
like
that.
D
You
approaching
that
problem
by
starting
with
applications
which
can
directly
link
into
technology
like
you
talked
about
with
the
farm
management
system
such
that
you
don't
need
verification
oracles,
or
are
you
working
on
verification,
oracles
and
how?
How
are
you
thinking
about
or
approaching
that
kind
of
great
ball
of
wax.
A
C
Yeah,
that's
a
a
really
good
question
and
it's
it's
hard
because
you
know
the
standards
within
you
know.
The
voluntary
carbon
markets
are
very
much
focused
on.
You
know,
vvvs
doing
a
lot
of
this
work,
and-
and
so
you
know
our
approach,
is
it
like
we're
not
taking
a
single
approach
to
do
this?
C
You
know
there
are
people
within
the
region
registry
program
that
want
and
are
more
comfortable
with
doing
the
more
traditional
route
and
relying
on
these
iso
certified
bodies
to
to
you
know
help
you
know,
go
in
and
assess
the
the
state
of
carbon
and
permanence.
Over
time
I
mean,
and
if
they
want
to
do
that,
that's
perfectly
fine!
You
know
the
approach
that
we
took
for
our
grasslands
methodology
is
is
like
hey.
C
You
know
soil
samples
things
like
that
to
actually
do
this
valve
validation
and
verification
work,
and
you
know,
within
our
own
team,
we're
not
necessarily
creating
verification
oracles,
but
within
the
ecosystem
at
large.
A
lot
of
that
work
is
being
done
and
and
we're
really
hoping
to
start
to
integrate
that
into
our
system.
So
you
know
it's
not
one
or
the
other,
but
we
are
trying
to
create
this
more
open,
open
system
and
really
rely
on
the
transparency.
C
Yeah
involved
to
you
know
kind
of
validate
claims.
A
Just
as
sam
is
saying
that,
like
we're
not
taking
a
sort
of
like
here's,
the
silver
bullet
approach,
we're
sort
of
like
have
several
elements
to
the
strategy
one
is
to
using,
is
essentially
to
decentralize
the
samsung,
the
verification
process.
Where
a
broader
group,
a
broader
community,
can
engage
with
the
verification
process
and
we
anchor
their
data
and
their
reputation
on
chain.
So
there's
sort
of
the
immutable
record
of
who
said
what
about
where
using
what
methodology
and
what?
What
data
that
is
directly
linked
to
the
minting
process
of
an
ecological
credit.
A
So
that's
sort
of
like
step,
one
is
in
in
the
eco
credit
module
and
then
invert
and
as
we
upgrade
to
version
3.0
having
the
data
module
online
essentially
enables
that
to
happen.
Then
they're
sort
of
like
okay.
What
are
the
technologies
that
increase
the
the
quality
or
reduce
the
cost
of
data
and
mod
models
that
are
being
used
to
monitor
and
then
quantify
carbon
outcomes?
A
That's
going
to
be
really
great,
but
at
the
moment,
if
we're
thinking
about
carbon,
you
know
it's
mostly
reducing
cost
and
as
sam
was
mentioning
the
the
main
way
we
already
accomplished
that
in
the
grasslands,
carbon
plus
program
and
credit
class
was
to
reduce
the
cost
of
soil
sampling
by
by
using
satellite
and
machine
learning
to
extrapolate
and
allow
for
less
soil
sampling
per
hectare,
while
increasing
the
accuracy
essentially
of
the
claims
and
then,
as
as
sam
said,
also
decentralizing
out,
who,
who
is
accepted,
to
go
sort
of
like
take
the
soil
sample
and
produce
the
and
and
sort
of
have
that
cross
edited
audited.
A
So
so,
hopefully,
that's
helpful.
We're
coming
up
against
the
top
of
the
hour
here
wanna.
I
know
our
team
has
stuff
to
do.
I
I
do
as
well
super
grateful
for
everybody
hopping
on
to
listen.
I
think
we'll
try
to
do
these
more
often
and
yeah
just
excited
for
for
this
emerging
regenerative
finance
space
excited
for
region,
ledger
2.0,
which,
which
shipped
and
launched
a
little
little
bit
ago
and
excited
for
the
upcoming
governance
vote.
That's
going
to
enable
r
d
inc
to
start
actively
issuing
credits
on
chain
here
shortly.
A
So
thanks
everybody
for
joining
us
again.
Thank
you,
ryan!
Thank
you,
sam
and
and
dave
as
always.
Thanks
for
convening
us
and
yeah
rock
on
everybody
have
a
great
day
regenerate.
Thank.