►
From YouTube: 2020-05-05 Rook Community Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
the
recording
has
started-
and
this
is
the
May
5th
2020
Brook
community
meeting-
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
off
here
with
the
current
milestones
in
1.2
I.
We
are
not
planning
on
doing
any.
Currently
any
patch
releases
for
1.2,
so
I,
don't
think,
there's
much
to
talk
about
there,
but
we
are
planning
on
doing
a
1.3
dot,
3
patch
release.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
open
that
board
there
and
get
an
update
on
what's
going
to
be
included
or
what
we're.
What
we're
waiting
for
drama
stay
Wednesday
for
that
yeah.
B
I
think
we
got
the
main
things
in
and
I'm
not
sure
anything
would
block
the
patch
release
now,
but
there
are
I'd
like
to
understand
a
couple
more
better,
like
this
helmet
helmet
art
update,
seems
to
be
a
nagging
issue
that
at
the
same
time,
that
might
be
older
versions
of
the
helm
that
are
causing
that.
So
you
know
we
might
just
ask
people
to
use
a
newer
version
of
helmet
or
else
work
around
I.
Think
that
was
the
conclusion
of
that.
But
I
was
out
yesterday.
Son
I
may
be
forgetting.
B
C
B
Cuz
well
what
this
couple
of
these
hell
machines
were
caused
by
is
that
we,
you
know
patch
release.
We
had
some
changes
to
that
helm,
chart
where
we
brought
the
helm
specs
in
line
with
our
common
yeah.
Well,
they've
gotten
out
of
sync,
since
it's
there's
nothing
that
checks
if
they're
the
same
specs
so
I
mean
like
we
brought
them
up
to
date,
and
then
there
were
some
changes
that
just
apparently
weren't
compatible
with
older
versions
of
them
that
upgrade
process
I.
A
See
yeah
I
mean
so
that's
just
within
helm,
v2
I,
I'm
kind
of
curious
about
what
the
distribution
of
versions
of
come
to
that
people
are
using,
but
I
mean
it's
kind
of
reasonable
to
expect
if
they
use
fairly
recent
one,
but
but
I'd
the
Eco
Indian
within
the
home
user
ecosystem
like
having
to
support
both
v2
and
v3
and
the
difference
different
functionality
and
like
affordances
that
each
have
is
kind
of
a
pain
to.
If
you
have
to
do
things
like
CR,
DS
and
hooks
and
stuff
like
that.
So
it's.
B
A
B
There's
one
and
that
one
in
the
review
right
now
that
one,
if
you're,
if
you're
scaling
down
the
set
MDS
is
which
happens
during
an
upgrade
there's
a
bad
command
in
there
that
it
causes
that
to
fail.
I
think
that's
a
good
one!
We
need
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
ready
yet,
but
seven
Blaine
have
changes
requested
on
it
and
it
was
just
pushed
yesterday.
I
think
an
update
to
it
so
I
guess
playing
inside.
If
you
want
take
another
look
at
that.
A
All
right
do
we
have
a
that's
our
gate
for
what,
when
we
take,
why
not
three,
but
three
will
go
out
just
later
on.
B
B
Say
you
go
back
to
the
board
there
I
think
well,
the
one
in
progress
there
for
the
dashboard.
That's
not
really
in
progress!
I
think
that's
just
a
Seth
issue
that
we're
waiting
for
a
new
octopus
release
for
and
then
the
object
store
buckets
that
one
I
can't
remember.
I'll,
look
at
that
again
before
the
patch
is.
B
There's
just
one
coming
to
just
one
that
one
patch
I
sent
today
I'm
about
to
merge
the
one
on
masters,
so
we
should
get
a
backboard
pretty
soon
in
what
was
in
a
minute
and
then
merge
it
today.
So
we'd
be
good
to
go
of
this
one
too
yep
sounds
good.
The
putter
fixes
come
in
before
Thursday.
Let's
pick
them
all
up.
A
Okay,
all
right.
Let's
move
in
ahead
to
the
community
topics
so
update
on
graduation,
so
Aaron
Aaron
Boyd
started
our
due
diligence
document
template
and
then
Travis
did
a
lot
of
work
to
fill
out.
Some
of
those
sections
and
I
think
the
only
section
that
may
need
some
more
contents
I
think
is
the
the
alternative
projects
in
the
landscape
and
how
to
compare
it
to
Brooke.
We
broke
down
some
of
the
ones.
A
I
thought
were
most
relevant
but
we
didn't
add
an
add
further
contents
on
them
and
I
I
expect
that
there
would
be
at
least
like
one
or
two
steno
sentences
comparison
of
the
like
the
high
level
approaches
of
what
those
projects
do
versus
what
rook
does
just
to
flesh
it
out
a
little
further,
so
I
think
that's
probably
content
it
that
needs
to
continue
I
would
expect.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
Travis
I.
B
A
Yeah
well
perhaps
yeah
yeah,
so
it
did.
Saad
has
replied
to
participated
in
the
comments
on
that
dok2.
So
if
we
added
a
comment,
there
I'm
sure
he
would
okay
give
us
a
pinion,
so
I
had
resolved
a
couple
of
it
cut
of
common
threads
in
that
darkness,
aden
princess
they
had
respondents
who
were
you
know
agreed
to
so
they're
he's
been
and
he's
been
participating,
and
then
next
steps
would
be
to
finish
that
document,
and
that
said,
Saad
and
Aaron
are,
you
know,
part
of
or
chairs
of
the
sig
storage
group.
A
A
The
see
member
I
think
would
then
take
the
next
steps
to
either
think
we
need
sods
input
here,
but
either
we
need
to
start
an
official
public
comment
period
by
sending
an
email
to
the
TOC
mailing
list
that
it's
not
just
for
the
TOC,
but
it's
like
TOC
business
items
that
hundreds
of
people
are
subscribed
to
to
officially
start
a
two-week
comment
period.
Since
we've
then
met
all
the
prerequisites,
finally
or
sod
can
call
it
vote,
but
I
will
get
his
opinion
on
which
what
is
the
next
step?
A
A
That's
what
I
was
thinking
or
hoping,
but
then
I,
remember
Amy
had
made
a
comment
of
in
talking
with
with
about
like
the
news
and
press
releases
and
stuff
like
that,
like
from
the
CN
CF
marketing
team,
she
was
saying
that,
oh,
that
the
two-week
comment
period
hasn't
started
yet
so
it's
gonna
be
at
least
another
two
weeks,
independent
of
the
due
diligence
document.
So
there's
a
cat's
and
they
need
her
untied
night,
okay
and
so
then
the
google
Summer
of
Code.
A
We
have
a
great
announcement
there
to
share,
so
the
google
Summer
of
Code
period
is
the
application
process
and
review
period
is
done
and
we
selected
a
proposal
from
all
of
the
proposals
that
were
submitted.
So
Ahmad
is
on
the
call
here
today
and
a
mods
proposal
for
rewriting
the
NFS
operator
to
use
controller
runtime
and
an
old
bunch
of
like
reliability.
Stability,
scalability,
fixes
associated
with
that
as
well
are
things
that
a
mod
will
be
tackling
this
this
summer.
C
A
Yeah,
thanks
for
your
proposal
in
your
interest
in
the
project
or
embers
we're
definitely
excited
to
work
with
you.
So
Ashish
in
Rohan
will
be
mentoring,
a
mod
as
well,
and
we
already
have
a
slack
conversation
going
to
start
the
community
bonding
period
where
a
mod
will
get
more
involved
in
the
project,
and
you
know
start
with
some-
maybe
small
fixes
to
get
more
familiar
with
everything
and
ready
to
ready
to
start
more
the
harder
design
and
more
challenging
bigger
items
for
the
summer
here.
A
But
we
have
had
two
awesome
summers
before
with
google
Summer
of
Code
and
I
am
expecting
the
third
ones
be
just
as
awesome.
A
mod
word.
Where
are
you
located?
Are
you
in
Indonesia,
yep
and
I
saw
samman?
I
was
I,
went
to
Bali
like
just
a
couple
months
ago
and
had
a
awesome
time
in
there.
I
love,
I,
love.
Indonesia
was
a
wonderful
place.
B
C
B
C
A
A
A
D
A
D
D
B
A
Yeah
I
don't
see
any
problem
with
that,
because
the
format
here
they
mentioned
is
you
know
the
talks
are
gonna
all
be
recorded.
They
will
not
be
live
presentations,
so
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
software
or
format
they
they
are
recommending
to
use
to
record
the
talks,
but
you
can
just
anybody
can
just
do
that.
That
makes
sense
to
you.
No
one
wants
to
participate
in
that.
Can
you
know
talk
during
a
given
time
slot
and
once
we
figure
out
what
the
you
know
overall
structure
should
be.
We.
D
A
D
Would
say,
let's
try
to
get,
everybody
did
want
to
talk,
let's
will
ping
Jared
Travis
or
me
and
we'll
put
maybe
we
can
set
up
a
select
channel
or
something
and
then
take
it
there
on
who
is
going
to
talk?
What's
in
the
intro
and
deep
dive
talk,
/
section
and
then
work
from
there
on
also
with
what
timezone
is
best
fast
yeah.
D
A
So
yes,
the
May
15
next
Friday
as
Alex
said,
is
the
deadline
for
speakers.
I
said
re
reconfirmed
because
this
is
the
second
time
we've
had
to
confirm
or
reconfirm
our
speaking
intent
with,
like
the
dates
changing
and
everything
changing
from
their
virtual
events
and
all
this
sort
of
stuff.
So
cool
we'll
follow
up
on
that
and
we'll
figure
out
the
speakers
or
topics
and
stuff,
and
we
can
collaborate,
collaborate,
collaborate,
collaborate
on
that
at
the
storage
providers
channel
or
shared
Google
Doc,
or
something
like
that.
All
right.
A
A
Pretty
curious
about
that,
like
what
I
mean
it's,
it's
obviously
losing
a
lot
of
value
by
not
being
able
to
be
in
person,
and
you
know
just
meet
people
randomly
in
the
hallways
and
you
know
socialize
connect
and
stop
in
the
booth.
So
yeah
like
it's
gonna,
miss
a
lot
about
you
I
think,
but
it
also
you
know
the
talks
like
I
mean
they're
all
gonna
be
recorded,
published
anyways.
A
D
D
B
C
C
C
B
Yeah,
if
I
were
to
split
my
words,
I'd
say
the
admission
controller
permissions
that
the
operator
would
need
they're
kind
of
well
they're,
pretty
high
security
level
kind
of
like
used
to
just
have
admin
permissions
and
to
create
our
back
and
things,
and
that
was
obviously
not
good
from
a
security
perspective.
So
we
went
kind
of
the
other
way
and
our
back
is
not
gonna
be
created
by
the
operator.
B
The
operator
should
not
have
too
many.
Permissions
is
the
point,
even
if
it
means
the
usability
goes
down
a
little
bit
or
it's
not
as
smooth
so
I.
Think
in
this
case.
Yes,
it's
it's
clear.
The
mission
hook
admission
controller
privileges
are
too
I
for
the
operator
to
have
so
yeah
I
wonder
if
we
can
still
find
a
way
to
simplify
the
experience.
B
C
C
B
B
A
Yeah,
it's
been
a
bit
of
a
you
know,
check
a
box
sort
of
thing
of
like
yes,
we
had
home
support
and
that's
one
way
to
get
the
operator
there,
but
you
know
we've
kind
of
at
least
had
somewhat
of
maybe
you
can
say
a
preference
for
you
know
it's
using
didn't
it
start
applying
the
yeah
mold
directly
instead,
but
helm
had
yeah,
it
has
a
fairly
really
good
feature
set
for
you
know
templating
and
configuration
and
management
and
stuff
like
that.
So
that's
interesting
to
look
into
more
thanks
for
the
hand
up
line.