►
From YouTube: 2020-06-02 Rook Community Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
the
recording
has
started-
and
this
is
the
June
2nd
2020
rook
community
meeting.
So
we
will
start
as
always,
with
our
milestone,
checkups
and
talk
about
upcoming
releases
and
patches
and
such
so
I
as
just
like
last
time.
I,
don't
think
we're
doing
any
1.2
back
ports
or
patches
so
I'll
skip
over
that
board.
But
we
do
have
a
one
out
3.5
coming
up
here.
A
A
B
I,
don't
think
so.
I
tried
to
get
the
board
updated
there
and
also
moved
some
things
out,
21.4
that
just
clearly
here
we're
never
gonna
make
it
into
one
bad.
Three,
so
I
think
there's
still
a
few
things
that
are
would
be
nice
to
get
back
cord
into
one
five
three,
since
we're
still
a
good
six
weeks
or
more
out
from
1.4,
but
those.
B
I
think
they're
all
the
ones
that
I'm
aware
of
that
would
be
nice
to
have
or
they're
I.
Don't
think
any
of
them
are
critical
either
and
one
of
them
just
kind
of
a
tracking
issue
like
the
first
one
in
the
in
progress
column
there
with
the
Ceph
dashboard,
which
is
still
not
working
in
the
latest
octopus
release.
It
looks
like,
but
it's
a
sailfish,
you
not
another
rookies.
You
know.
B
A
B
A
A
C
A
It
cool
is
that
you
think
that'll
be,
and
so
that's
and
that's
essentially
completely
out
of
and
as
you're
saying
right
from
Brooke
release
process
right,
like
that,
has
everything
to
do
it's
getting
merged
into
the
operator
framework,
repo,
the
community
of
the
operators
or
whatever
repos
yeah
exactly
so.
This
is
just
a
tracking
issue
on
our
side,
then
yep.
B
C
A
B
Right
I
tried
to
move
a
whole
bunch
of
things
into
this
board
that
that
we
really
should
think
about
for
one
got
four
I'm
sure
there's
more
well,
we
always
add
more
to
the
project
board.
This
is
kind
of
the
first
pass
that
getting
the
1.4
board
populated
and
I.
Don't
know
that
we
need
to
review
any
of
these.
These
things
in
progress
here,
but
the
you
know
back
in
the
the
doc
I've
got
tentative
dates
proposed,
just
as
you
know,
to
keep
our
roughly
quarterly
cadence.
A
A
B
Absolutely
I
don't
see
them
in
the
meeting,
but
just
wanted
to
congratulate
to
remember
the
community
who
have
really
been
contributing
a
bunch.
You
know
commenting
on
PRS
and
issues
and
resolving
things
in
slack
in
a
timely
manner.
It's
just
really
helpful
for
the
community,
and
so
they
are
now
officially
Brook
reviewers,
which
yeah
it
basically
means
that
that
they're
contributing
well
their
feedback
is
valuable
on
PRS
and
PRS
can
be
merged
after
they've,
approved
them
and
yep.
So
I'm
just
grateful
for
satoru
and
let
my
to
use
contributions.
Yeah.
A
C
A
A
Now
so
it's
been
published
their
terms,
I,
don't
think
I
heard
back
from
Aaron
on
a
couple
of
different
requests
to
make
sure
that
that
document
was
shared
and
publicly
accessible
outside
of
Red
Hat,
because
when
I
was
looking
at
the
sharing
settings,
it
still
said
you
know
anyone
at
Red
Hat
can
have
with
the
link
can
open
it.
So
I
think
it's
still
like
you
know
internally
restricted
there
can
you
can
you
maybe
try
to
pay
her
to
and
see
if
or
see?
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
A
So
then,
the
since
the
do
due
diligence
document
is
published
and
part
of
the
poll
requests
their
sad
Ally.
Our
CSU
sponsor
met
with
that
and
he
addressed
of
the
TOC
and
their
bimonthly
private
TOC
meeting
and
confirmed
the
next
steps
are
now
that
the
cig
they
gave
and
their
recommendation
the
rook
should
graduate,
but
they
need
to
publish
a
document
saying
so
now
so
Aaron
and
Alex
Kirk
up
or
from
the
CN
CF,
storage,
sig
or
gonna
be
following
up
to
publish
that
document.
A
C
C
A
A
D
Yeah
there's
two
so
I'm
from
first
and
time
in
meeting
in
our
team.
The
workload
thing
has
been
submitted
this
to
ticket.
It's
only
enablement,
so
the
first
one
is
to
fix
the
mess
images
script
of
route
park
on
the
AR
64.
The
second
one
is
to
fix
the
make
you
be
install
script
of
Ruta
support
for
our
64,
so
it's
just
small
countries
during
the
dependency
issues
we
found
during
enablement
of
air
64
for
Roche.
So
this
is
just
work
in
progress.
Just
wanna.
A
B
A
Yeah
I
wasn't
able
to
open
them
either
when
I
clicked
on
them.
Here
I
got
a
like.
It
looks
like
it
was
a
DNS
looking
issue
for
me.
It
named
not
results
yeah.
Can
you
check
those
links
Tina
and
then,
if
they're
like,
like
a
different
public
link,
the
folks
outside
of
arm
can
access.
Then
we
can
update
them
here
in
the
dock.
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
A
Great
I
was
there's
another
thing:
oh
yeah,
so
in
so
the
you
know,
the
initial
months,
like
the
community
bonding
period,
is
now
completed
and
the
coding
phase
started
I
think
yesterday.
So
we're
now
on
the
official
coding
phase
and
in
a
mod
is
all
ramped
up
and
familiar
with
all
the
all
the
code
base
in
the
build
system
and
the
community
in
slack
and
everything.
So
a
mod
is
ready
to
hit
the
ground
running
and
start
start
doing
some
more
coding,
so
yeah
also
my
mom.
C
B
Just
a
note
on
that
I
mean
I
made
a
pass
through
the
road
map
made
all
the
updates
I
was
aware
of,
and
you
know,
the
updates
are
quite
Seth
centric,
so
like
to
a
screen
put
from
other
storage
providers
like
especially
now
with
the
NFS
operator.
Getting
work,
I'm
gonna,
add
some
more
items
to
that
edge
of
fast
something
to
be
treated,
get
add
your
best
input
there,
but
yep.
Just
a
general
note,
that'd
be
good
to
get
more
input
on
the
roadmap
that.
B
B
But
I
try
to
google
sugar
search
and
yeah
pretty
much
any
rook
topics.
I
found
landed
on
like
Oh,
dot,
six
documentation,
road,
nine
or
whatever
kind
of
seems
like
the
oldest
topic
for
what
I
was
ever
searching
for.
So
this
is
a
good
suggestion
from
from
this
person
here
to
improve
the
search
results
to
give
us.
The
latest
does.
A
A
dislike
the
Gatsby
framework,
or
you
know
the
whatever
static
site
generator
thing
we're
using
does
that
have
built-in
support
for
it,
like
maybe
in
the
front
matter
or
some
other
config
in
the
repo
you
can
set.
That's
a
great
question.
I
do
not
know
yeah
Alexander's
done
a
fair
amount
of
work
with
you
know,
updating
the
docs,
repo
and
stuff
like
that,
I
wonder
if
he
has
a
idea
of
how
possible
this
is
right.
C
A
B
B
Joining
Red
Hat
marketing
team,
who
could
help
with
open
source
projects
like
Brooke
I,
talked
to
them
on
Friday,
and
he
may
be
able
to
have
some
time
well.
You
will
have
some
time
to
work
on
rook
and
the
project
I
was
kind
of
thinking.
They're
working
with
him
on
is
we've
got
all
these
great
testimonials
and
that's
kind
of
you
know.
Can
we
add
that
to
more
or
make
it
more
visible
on
the
website,
instead
of
just
having
it
in
like
a
doctors
that
nd,
it
I
think
you
know
mm-hmm.
C
B
B
A
Sound
that
sounds
good
and
then
also
I'm
happy
to
give
them
access
to
like
the
raw
responses
in
details.
I
got
from
all
of
the
adopters
that
I
interviewed.
It
got
surveys
from
and
stuff
like
that,
so
you
know
if
they
want
more
details
than
what's
on
adopter
statmd,
just
just
connect
them
with
me
and
I'll
get
him
I'll
get
him
set
up
with
access
to
the
raw
raw
data.
Yep.
A
B
A
Okay,
just
a
quick
note
that
so
the
Nats
project,
you
know
like
open
source
like
message
queue
type
of
CN
CF
project,
the
founder
of
that
Derek
Allison.
He
reached
out
just
recently
about
that.
They
they
got
some
they're
having
issues
with
some
of
their
solutions
and
customer
for
customers
on
Azure
with
Azure
files,
and
it
may
be
that
they
got
some
advice
to
come
check
out
rook.
And
to
that
you
know
the
rook
offering
would
be
a
better
solution
for
them
for
persistence
of
data
for
their
customers.
A
So
he's
gonna
be
an
email
like
over
the
weekend
and
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
of
what
the
requirements
are
so
far.
It
was.
There
was
a
little
bit
short,
but
that's
something
that
I'll
probably
broke
some
of
some
of
you
all
in,
because
I
think
that
staff
would
probably
be.
You
know
the
best,
a
good
solution
for
that,
and
so
getting
some
advice
or
some
some
help,
help
making
them
successful.
A
fellow
CN
CF
project,
successful
than
you
know,
adopting
rook
as
well
would
be
really
nice.
A
C
A
I,
don't
actually
know
I,
don't
know
Derek
personally,
I
just
know
him
from
like
know
about
him
from
podcasts
and
stuff,
like
that.
He's
done
a
lot
of
really
cool
work,
he's
really
really
well-spoken,
but
another
contributor
and
up-bound
employee
has
a
personal
relationship
with
him
and
she
connected
us
together,
but
I'll
get
them
connected
to
the
the
people
that
that
know
more
about
the
hands-on
practical
solutions.
B
A
A
A
But
that's
opened
people
to
add
some
I
followed
up
on
my
action
item
for
a
while
at
least
I
worked
at
IO
wasn't
wasn't
working
and
it's
a
usurer,
it's
a
it's,
not
plural.
It's
released
that
rook
that
IO
to
troubleshoot
that
it's
our
DNS
records,
the
net
laughs,
I
and
I
saw
an
entry
immediately
for
police
that
rook.
That.
A
Know
what
we
were
tired,
I,
don't
know
how
we're
talking
about
it,
but
we
were
talking
about
the
artifacts
there
and
I
was
like
yeah.
Oh,
you
know
one
releases
that
rook
that
IO
and
I've
typed
it
into
the
web
browser
and
it
was
like
error
not
found.
I
was
like
oh
shoot.
What's
wrong
with
this
thing,
so
much
much
ado
about
nothing.
A
C
B
Oh
follow
up
I'll,
get
an
answer
on
that
note.
If
you
any
parents
to
bring
up
in
their
first
yards
they're,
definitely
some
big
ones
were
getting
close
to
merging
the
admission
controller.
Nate
is
working
on
welcome
Vinnie.
Anything
you
want
to
bring
up
here
with
with
that
Vinnie
I
need
to
give
it
a
final
review.
E
So
we
were
discussing
on
the
Sebastian
and
I
in
the
huddle
we
were
discussing
about
whether
we
need
to
change
it
change
that
to
using
the
controller
runtime
library
for
the
web
folks,
so
I'm
just
little
bit
confused
on
that
part,
Travis
you're
saying
that
we
ought
to
implement
that
continued
runtime
and
was
saying
that
if
it
doesn't
so,
if
it
doesn't
need
to
be
added
to
the
reconcile
logic,
it
can
stay
like
that.
So
only
fail
reconciling
something
you
might
need
to
use
the
controller
runtime.
B
E
E
B
So
what
I
was
thinking?
I
haven't
looked
into
that
package
myself,
but
I
mean
if
that
package
implements
some
things
we
are
already
using
like
I
know,
there
was
some
some
code
that
you
found
another
project
that
that
we're
using
like
does
that
web
package
mean
we
don't
need
that
that
code
that
we
found
in
the
other
project,
if
it
already
implements
that
or
yeah
I,
don't
know
what's
in
that
package,
so
it
just
depends
on
what
it
offers
for
whether
that
makes
sense
to
use
it.