Rust Programming Language Core Team, 11 Dec 2019

Previous Meeting Next Meeting

⏯

youtube image

►

From YouTube: Core Team Meeting 2019-12-11

Description

Core Team Meeting 2019-12-11

A

Okay, this is the December 11th core team meeting and our first item is the team wide stand-up meeting, which Nico has started an email on. Do you have anything else.

B

Seems to be suggesting that if nothing else, adding some asynchronous chatroom sort of thing might be a good next step, possibly a mailing list as well. The only thing I would add is that we we don't currently, we currently have a mailing list. Child leaves that is kind of like the membership of this, but it also includes sort of all the things in the team repo. All the working groups are not only the domain working groups, which is a much broader set, I'm, not sure.

B

That's, actually a problem, I think if those groups start to become you know, I mean I, think a lot of those groups are active and it would be okay for their leads to be in there. Basically, and if they're not that active, maybe we need to dress so maybe we already have such a list and.

C

We should just try using it, you say all the leads. Do you mean that these are leaves of some team working groups or just the working groups that are not going working groups like the security code, London.

B

That is a domain working group from my definition, at least so I mean anything. The website doesn't draw a distinction. In any case, it just has what you okay, so you mean you mean all the things at the bottom of the website. Yeah, okay, yeah I, do think we should introduce it just another category as in the site, but maybe that would affect this list, but I also think, even if we had another category that might be the right set of people for an email list.

C

It was unclear to me if you're talking about including all the sub team working groups, but it doesn't seem like you are I- think.

B

I am at least the compiler inline team are trying to reflect all those on the web page. So things like the learning working group.

C

Included in liens as well, so this is anyone who's not at launchers, will lead anyway anywhere got it yeah.

B

In the past, we've been drawing a distinction, I think in part cuz. Those groups have been a little less sort of organized and active, but anyway that's where it stands. Now we can move on I, think.

A

Okay, next I am is staged, RFC is stages I'm, whatever we call it, but it hasn't been two weeks so I don't know. If you have an update.

B

A

That's what I thought.

A

Legal issues: Niko: do you have anything on that since Florence, not here.

B

No last time Felix and Felix and Felix or fluorine forget some.

A

Fluorine we're.

B

A

A

White paper is this Florin community team reorganization? Do you have anything on that Manish I.

C

Think that still being discussed I would wait for.

C

A

Roadmap planning, Nico.

B

So we had a meeting, you probably should schedule another meeting. The initial things we discussed were around kind of what the ropes say. The big three themes were like what the road map should look like and there the general consensus that we want to talk about goals or like areas of focus and not so much Pacific agenda items and leave that more to be unrolled by the teams as they go.

B

But the other one was the question of the addition and I think what we did get consensus and there was that if there will be in addition, this year should definitely be the year to do all the prep work like we should be in place so that we're doing polish over the next and not implementation of features, and it was a little unclear whether we would sort of say it somehow like that that this is the year to do the work and make the final decision I guess in the roadmap or whether we would try to reach a decision sort of at least the tentative one beforehand.

B

um And then the final thing was trying to group together the feedback into themes and I. Think that's where we made the least progress. I was hoping to play with it a little, but we're gonna need more time. Also the will come to it. I mean the survey. Data will be interesting when it's available, which kind of already is I, mean it's been a lot of responses still open.

A

Yeah the service, the next on the agenda. So if you have anything else to say about that, I don't.

B

Have any update, except that that it would run until the 16th, so we've gotten I, don't know the current numbers, but when I looked midway through last week there were thousands, maybe 8,000 or something after just a few days. So I assume we've gotten a lot of responses.

B

I'll touch base with Jason and see what what's the next steps there.

A

Okay, anything you want to say about the governance working group.

B

We had a we discussed access rights for github, repos last meeting that was I guess. I may have said that last time he kind of had some some plans. I wrote them up in a blog post just yesterday, I don't think we have to go through the details, but we're not exciting.

A

Oh okay, anything else for the public part of the meeting.

A