►
From YouTube: Core Team Meeting 2020-08-26
Description
Core Team Meeting 2020-08-26
A
B
B
A
C
That
yeah,
so
basically
we
I
implemented
that
only
team
leads,
like
all
team
leads,
can
post
on
the
insider's
blog,
but
it
was
pointed
out
that
it
might
also
be
useful
for
project
group
leads
to
be
able
to
post
there
as
well
like
the
it
was
to
ask
for
working
groups.
But
that
also
includes
all
the
main
working
groups
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
want
to
have
domain
working
groups
per
center,
and
eventually,
all
working
groups
that
are
not
domain
should
be
moved
towards
project
groups.
C
D
Yeah,
I
don't
think
I'd
have
a
problem
with
the
embed
for
some
other
working
group
posting
there,
but
I
guess
they
haven't
done
that
in
the
past
and
seems
okay.
I
definitely
think
project
groups
do
regularly
post
blog
posts
and
that
was
kind
of
one
of
the
goals
of
even
having
the
blog
in
the
first
place.
So
you
should
encourage
that.
B
Yeah,
I
think
the
issue
is
that
there's
like
a
weird
like
we
had
like
the
og
for
domain
working
groups,
and
then
there
was
the
period
of
domain
like
of
working
groups
before
project
groups,
and
so
I
I
think
that,
maybe
to
gain
permission,
that's
how
like
get
the
governance
in
order.
This
will
be
a
fun
motivator.
A
Resolved
okay,
petro:
are
you
gonna,
take
care
of
that?
Are
you
looking?
Okay,
all
right,
awesome
all
right.
The
next
issue
under
initiatives
is
considering
pulling
the
citizen
code
of
conduct
partially
to
the
wrestling
repo
and
florian's,
not
here,
but
updated
the
issue
with
a
proposed
change
on
a
gist.
So
I
think
he
is
asking
us
to
review
that
and
post
any
concerns.
So
please
do
that
after
this
meeting.
D
Well,
okay,
steven,
I
had
a
meeting
we
talked
and
we
posted
a
follow-up
comment
on
the
rfc
asking
for
people
to
clarify
a
certain
thing
that
we
weren't
sure
we
understood
and
we
were
planning
to
think
the
talk
again
is
that
right,
I'm
like
still
coming
online
from
today
from
being
away.
So
I'm
a
little
spacey,
but
I
think
that
was
kind
of
where
we
stood
we
did.
We
could
go
into
more
details
of
what
we
said,
but
I
don't
think
it's
the
right
necessarily
have
to
at
this
moment.
D
So
we
very
slim
update
is
that
we
started
so
aaron
started.
Asking
around
for
people
on
the
project
leads
section
talk
about
like
which
questions
they
found
useful,
and
we
had
planned
to
follow
up
this
week
for
like
trying
to
get
a
draft
of
we're,
we're
looking
to
sort
of
go
from
the
old
survey
and
maybe
slim
it
down
a
little
bit.
D
F
B
F
D
I
don't
think
that
any
decision
has
been
made,
but
first
of
all,
but
why
we
are
looking
into
it.
I
from
my
point
of
view,
I
agree
with
consistency.
I
did
not
envision
this
as
major
revisions,
but
more
looking
at
some
of
the
questions
to
see.
If
just
like,
we
want
to
keep
go
from
what
we
had
to
the
next
round.
We
keep
them
pretty
close
because
it's
less
work
and
because
it
ensures
consistency,
maybe
along
the
way.
There
are
some
questions.
We
don't
need
to
ask
that's
how
I
was
thinking
of
it.
D
I'm
not
actually
sure.
If
that's
how
aaron
was
thinking
of
it,
I
do
think
getting
a
more
of
a
like
actual
working
group
would
be
a
good
idea.
We
haven't
had
a
real
meeting
and
that's
a
problem
and
I'm
a
little
bit
worried
about
like
general.
This
needs
to
be
budgeted
time-wise,
I
don't
feel
like
it
has
been
and
right
now
it's
kind
of
proceeding
a
little
ad
hoc,
which
I'm
not
super,
filled
about
yeah.
B
D
B
B
C
Not
like,
ideally,
we
need
to
land
it
like.
I
think,
joshua
hasn't
still
made
the
changes.
I
asked
her
and
like
some
it,
he
was
the
one
who
brought
the
rfc
and
like
there
is
some
rough
consensus
on
what
I
proposed
like
eventually.
It's
like.
I
think
we
need
to
like.
We
need
to
land
this
overseas
sooner
or
later,
because
we're
getting
a
lot
of
tier
increase
requests
and
like
we're
doing
it
a
lot
of
adoption,
the
next
formal
policy
or.
F
E
F
B
D
F
A
Yeah,
let's,
let's
take
it
off
our
check-in
list,
anything
with
governance,
working
group,
no
okay,
the
email
answering
solution,
florian
linked
me,
a
tweet
that
had
a
very
very
promising
in
the
sense
that
they
have
free
plans
for
open
source
projects.
So
I'm
gonna.
I
have
it
on
my
to-do
list
to
check
that
one
out,
hopefully
by
next
week,
but
no
real,
update
there,
switching
to
periodic
check-ins
florian's,
not
here,
so
I'm
not
seeing
anything.
Anyone
have
anything
else
for
the
public
part
of
the
meeting.
B
A
B
B
We've
also
been
doing
some
things
around
sorting,
some
of
our
like
sponsors
for
infra
that
are
not
via
the
foundation
right
now,
but
we've
kind
of
taken
that
off
of
coors
plate
and
are
having
those
conversations
in
the
foundation
project
group
now.
So
those
are
the
updates
that
I
have
so
far
and
if
anybody
else
from
that
group
wants
to
like
weigh
in
if
I
miss
something.