►
From YouTube: Lang-team triage meeting 2020.03.26
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
State
turns
me:
I,
don't
think
anyone
here,
it's
Brian
Brian
told
me
that
something's
happening,
but
that's
all
so
for
FF
I
unwind.
We
were
waiting
on
people
to
what
they
thought,
but
I'm
the
kind
of
things
that
exist
so
far.
All
right,
so
I
posted
a
comment
in
flavor
of
Ceylon
wine.
That's
highlights
oh
man,
but
central.
Also
favored,
seon
wine
Felix
didn't
write
a
comment,
but
if
they
ever
see
I'm
lying
in
our
PRC
discussion,
I,
don't
miss,
preferring
see
cuz
I
think
it.
A
A
A
A
Where
was
I?
Oh
right,
yes,
I
think
we
should
go
forward
that
the
only
question
I
had
is
you
were
saying
I'm
anew
about
and
of
the
scope
of
what
rx.
He
makes
sense
that
you
would
want
to
include
the
behavior
of
foreign
exceptions
and
I
was
saying
we
could
possibly
just
say:
that's
unone,
that's
you
being
will
resolve
it
in
this
follow-up.
A
B
Basically,
if
caption
wine
catches
a
for
an
exception
to
C++
exception,
it
will
return
a
box
for
an
exception
as
the
con
type.
But
when
you
try
to
we
throw
that
box,
it's
gets
wreath
thrown
as
a
rust
panic
ignores.
We
can't
actually
capture
a
C++
exception
without
adding
a
dependency
on
the
C++
runtime.
C
B
B
A
Enough,
but
that
is
on
our
list
of
things
to
cover,
which
is
wireless,
where
I
was
where's
one
strike,
while
the
iron
is
hot,
but
it
seems
like
that
details
can
be
hairy.
We
can
certainly
like
if
we're
saying
that
foreign
exceptions,
you
know,
are
you
be
at
the
moment,
and
we
can.
We
have
some
room
to
experiment
with
different
behaviors
right.
B
A
Yeah,
if
it
can't
yeah,
okay,
I
guess
that's
right.
So
basically
a
key
constraint
would
be,
or
whatever
happens,
catch
on
line
must
have
one
of
these
behaviors
to
make
way
on
/.
What
was
the
crate?
You
were
Mia
take
mokou,
taken
Union
/.
C
C
B
E
B
A
F
One
note
is
that,
as
currently
the
PR
is
sort
of
stated,
it
doesn't
actually
update
any
of
our
documentation.
So
like
we
don't
mm-hmm.
The
main
reason
why
I
still
wanted
some
sort
of
laying
sign
off
is
because,
historically
especially
in
this
area,
we've
had
very
sort
of
it.
Is
you
be?
But
people
depend
on
it
and
in
practice
we
are
hesitant
to
change
things.
A
B
A
I
mean
because
you
could
just
see
that
steal
out
of
you
to
propagate
that
case.
You're,
not
well,
then,
that
all
that
means
is.
We
would
not
mark
C
functions
as
yeah,
then
we're
back
to
proposal
three.
No,
but
we're
not
because
the
main
downsides
the
proposal
three
was
around
or
what
happens
when
you
change
to
you
introduced
you
be
when
you.
A
When
you
change
to
pay
me,
people
support
it
and
that's
no
longer
true,
because
that
only
a
matter
piece
of
misconceptions:
it's
okay,
we'll
have
to
go
too
much
into
it,
but
it's
just
interesting
I
think
we
should
move
on
so.
G
B
C
A
D
A
F
Also
note
that
the
current
like
cash
and
wine
function,
docks
are
very
vague
and
the
way
you
can
currently
interpret
them
is
like
we
catch
some
panics,
but
not
all
panics
and
it's
very
sort
of
up
in
the
air
whether
it
can
actually
be
used
for
what
taking
it
does.
So
there
is
assumes
the
actual
main.
That's
or.
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
C
B
F
C
E
B
So,
okay,
so
we
have
his
new
options.
The
first
option
is
to
error
on
any
lineman.
If
you
try
to
put
in
alignment
greater
than
some
target
dependent
value,
let's
say
so:
okay,
then
it's
an
error.
The
other
option
is
to
allow
large
alignments,
but
don't
them
for
statics,
and
this
gets
a
bit
more
complicated
because
you
have
other
issues
like
constant
promotions
and
a
bunch
of
others
as
well.
I'm
sure
I
think.
E
I'm
just
pondering
a
restriction
like
right
now
we
have
the
we
don't
say
your
arrays
can't
get
the
most
4
billion.
We
say
well
that
type
that
you
tried
to
make
is
too
big
to
fit
on
your
current
target.
I'm
sort
of
feeling
like
in
the
abstract.
This
is
that
same
kind
of
air.
It's
like
it's
not
necessary.
It's
not
like
a.
E
C
E
E
B
C
B
A
A
A
C
C
D
C
Where
it
tries
to
person
or
if
there's
a
graphic,
so
what
happens
is
that
we
we
try
to
okay.
So
we
try
to
decide
check
if
there's
a
for
keyword
and
then
we
try
to
decide
whether
we
should
parse
generics
or
not
like
a
for
you
and
honey's,
and
then
we,
if
we
decide
for
the
former,
then
then
we
try
to
parse.
C
You
know
the
quantifier
before
like
function,
pointers
and
Unbounce
in
which
might
Martha,
and
it
will
get
an
error
inside
that
and
we
could
do
background
backtracking
when
trying
to
parse
that
and
you
figure
out,
okay,
which
is
actually
in
work
as
battle
patterns
that
and
then
we
can
suggest
Frances,
although
this
is
sort
of
initial
case
electri.
So
maybe
it's
not
worth
it,
but
I
could
do
they
do
that.
Well,
that's
just
for
error
messages.
Maybe
you're
suggesting.
A
I,
don't
know
that
yeah
I,
don't
care
about
that.
I
just
want
to
understand
what
rule
we
actually
might
know.
I,
don't
know
I
I'm,
okay,
with
this
change,
I
think
it
would
have
been
nice
to
being
a
team
but
I
think
it's
a
reasonable.
A
C
Okay,
do
you
want?
Maybe
please
what's
going
on
exactly
so.
These
are
two
methods
up
on
the
Spanish
yang
and
resolve
that
takes
the
current
span
and
resolves
it
with
the
hygiene
of
the
other
span
and
located
takes
the
current
spawns
and
changes.
The
location
to
the
other.
Spaniel
teeth
keeps
the
heightened
emotion
this
like
better,
but
instead
in
that
was
me.
A
C
C
C
This
this
is
a
prerequisite
for
doing
this.
The
reason
we've
been
history
since
then
lies
from
macros
in
expression
patterns
in
statements
is
that
we
have
an
exposed,
no
reasonable,
inviting
option
to
use
names
so
right
now,
if
we
stabilize
this
without
me
site,
they
would
use
my
qualified
hygiene,
and
this
would
be
very
bad
for
questions
and.
C
A
C
C
A
I
feel
pretty
personally
pretty
motivated
to
make
something
like
programmatic,
or
fact
that
works
it
doesn't
require
using
a
creative
called
from
macro
hack
and,
hopefully
is
less
of
a
heck,
yeah
I.
However,
you
know
this
has
been
this.
Is
that
perennial
issue
of
we
don't
know?
Quite
what's
going
on
whatever
I'm
wondering
going.
C
So
one
concern
I
have,
which
was
result
is
that
this
wouldn't
be
the
default
option.
Okay,
folks,
while
people
could
do
the
right
thing,
the
default
in
introns
sort
of
non
steeple
in
the
wrong
direction
like
you
have
to
use,
quotes
found
instead
of
they
were
not
from
I
mean
it's
basically
passive,
it's
like
which
is,
and
unfortunately
there
were
some
some
vacated
making
changes
in.
C
We
create
around
testing
this
and
we
would
change
the
default
in
quote
than
some
crates
been
great,
so
he's
no
man,
I
didn't
feel
like
would
be
reasonable
to
to
make
a
mention
change
right
now
or
introducing
the
Rochefort
award
or
something
like
that,
but
I
sort
of
they
sort
of
switch.
My
concerns
because
they
image
how
to
not
to
increase
which
I
felt
was
reasonable.
C
F
C
They
basically
said
thing
that
some
some
documentation
on
the
pitfalls
like
think
about
this
as
using
is
been
like
cinematic
vote,
so
I
think
is
easily.
Do
we
think
we
could
migrate?
People
with
deprecation
in
the
quote.
Great
love
was
something
you
suggested
it
on
the
threat,
but
they
didn't
feel
that
would
be
proportionate.
F
A
It
may
not
be
productive,
but
what
I
would
like
is
to
spread
the
knowledge
a
little
past
contraction
right.
What
that,
actually
with
that
sentence,
you
just
said
means
expose
that,
like
yeah,
how
is
it
working
and
so
forth
right.
C
A
A
C
C
A
D
D
The
unsafe
block
and
unsafe
functions,
I
was
the
one
who
had
posted.
Like
the
you
know,
formal
concern
I
was
trying
to
encode
what
Hale
or,
as
others
and
said
and
I
always
find.
It
done.
Read
the
summaries
of
later
discussions
trying
to
figure
out
whether
we
had
decided
something
that
was
resolved
concerning.
F
My
impression
is
that
we
have
and
that
we
need
a
new,
probably
a
new
FCP
or
just
entirely
bypass
it,
because
the
new,
the
thing
that
I
think
we
have
consensus
on
is
that
we
don't
actually
need
any
RFC
or
FTP
here,
because
we're
just
adding
an
allowed
by
default
length,
essentially
and
then
separately.
There
will
be
more
discussion
around
the
broader
question
of
whether
we
want
to
change
things
in
a
more
severe
sentence
of
techy.
Faults
are
all
right:
I
wanted.