►
From YouTube: 2021-04-15 RFC 2229 Sync
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
B
That
was
the
problem
thanks.
I
just
got
new
headphones
and
I
haven't
gotten
used
to
them.
C
Right
so
updates
from
rn
would
be
auto
trades
and
significant
destructor
stuff
is,
for
the
most
part
done
when
I
say
significant
destructors,
I'm
talking
from
the
infrastructure
not
going
and
tagging
standard
love,
because
I
think
that's
a
different
discussion
might
involve
lips.
I
do
have
a
question
around
that.
I.
C
Yeah
I
yeah
okay
yeah.
We
can
actually
discuss
this
that
as
well.
Let
me
share
my
screen.
I
have
one
well,
I
guess
I'll
show
you
how
we
are
annotating
once
I
probably
will
need
screen
sharing
privileges.
C
All
right,
okay,
so.
C
All
right
so
now
that
we
are
adding
this
new
query,
which
is:
do
we
have
significant
drop
types?
Do
you
want
this
to
be
cashed
on
disk,
because
this
is
ideally
people?
I
don't
know
how.
Often
people
will
be
running
this
that
this
query
needs
to
be?
We
get
benefit
out
of
cashing.
It
then,
like
not
cash,
it.
A
B
C
C
A
C
D
A
C
So
there
is
some
I
feel
okay,
so
there
might
be
an
issue
with
that.
So
if,
let's,
let's
think
of
strings
the
string,
I'm
assuming
is
implemented
as
a
vector
of
characters
internally,
I
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
think
string
does
not
have
a
drop
implemented
on
its
own,
but
it
relies
on
vector
having
that
drop.
C
Yeah,
I
guess
when
we
do
the
analysis
of
string
we'll
say
no,
but
but
that
means
that
string
will
probably
have
to
be
analyzed
at
runtime.
D
C
C
I
see
the
problem
yes
compile
time,
basically
like
we
could,
just
if
we
have
it
on
the
def
id,
we
can
say.
Okay,
the
moment
you
see
a
string,
you
know
it's
not
a
significant
drop
type.
Otherwise,.
A
A
A
There's
another
problem
with
your
proposal
is
that
sometimes
you
want
if
it's
a
generic
type
like
vec.
I
was
gonna
say
that
I
wanted.
A
A
C
C
Yeah,
it
can
be
yeah,
it'd,
probably
be
a
nice.
If
you
do
a
map
or
something
or
and
then
or
something
like
that
or.
A
C
A
C
Okay,
yeah
and
then
we
have
auto
trades
somewhere
working.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
find
that
vr
nope
wrong
repository.
No,
I
don't
fork.
A
C
Yes,
so
basically,
I
think
I
will
condense
these
tests,
but
but
now
we
can
detect
like
if
we
have
yeah,
I
guess
we
should
probably
discuss
the
what
messages
we
go
in
here,
just
to
make
sure
that
isn't
affected.
B
C
Have
so
we
have
snd,
which
is
not
clone,
we
have
clone
defined
on?
U
and
now
we
can
sort
of
detect
that
going
forward
this
function.
This
closure
will
not
be
a
clone
just
because
of
because
of
the
fact
that
initial,
because
of
like
the
precise
yeah.
C
Yeah,
so
there
are
two
things
around
this
one.
We
maybe
want
to
separate
the
message
for
clown
and
sentencing,
which
I
just
realized
and
the
other
one
is.
C
Yes,
that,
and
also
one
thing
that
would
be
interesting
would
would
be
when
someone
runs
the
two
to
two
one
migrations
as
a
whole,
or
even,
if
they're
running
two
of
these
migrations.
Instead
of
introducing
two
lines
of
dummy
reads,
just
because
one
is
coming
from
the
trade
analysis
and
one
is
coming
from
the
drop
re-order
analysis,
we.
C
So
the
question
around
that
is:
do
we
do
this?
Only
if
we
have
the
two
to
one
lint
group
enabled-
or
we
do
this
if
we
have
both
of
them
enabled
because
the
suggestions
will
probably
go
out
as
separate,
because
when,
when
you're
telling
them
to
the
user,
that
okay,
this
land
trigger
that,
that
link
triggered
this
message.
A
I
see,
I
think
the
ideal
would
be
to
have
one
lint,
that's
like
so
what
you
would
give
you
would
do
your
two
analyses
and
they
would
compute
the
set
of
variables
that
they
need
and
why,
like
maybe
some
I
if
we
want
to
be
really
ideal,
we
give
some
spans
or
something.
But
I
don't
even
know
if
we
need
that,
because
this
is,
I
don't
think
we
have
to
work
too
hard
and
then
we
would
give
one
lint
that
basically
says
dummy,
let
required.
A
I
think
you
know
something
like
that
and
then
has
the
full
let
and
then,
if
we
wanted
to
do
the
extra
mile,
we
would
have
some
some
notes
where
we
highlight
like
this
variable
is
going
to
be
dropped.
This
variable
implements
send,
or
you
know
I
mean,
give
more
information
about
the
specific
variables
within
the
closure.
Yeah
yeah,
but.
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
So
I
ported
the
compiler.
Oh,
did
you
back
in
december?
Yes,
I
did
that
there
was
only
one
audited,
migration
that
was
needed,
compiler
compiles
and
I
had
to
make
one
change
and
rust
analyzer.
But
since
then
we
have
also
fixed
that
issue,
which
was
the
struct
update
pattern.
C
Yes,
let's
do
that.
Okay,.
B
C
C
C
No
so
yeah
so
from
from
that
perspective,
yeah,
I
don't
okay,
I
don't
remember
someone
moved
it
to
here,
and
I
didn't
relate
this,
so
these
are
about
done
yeah.
This
is,
I
guess,
in
review
amongst
us,
so
I'll
just
put
that
here
should
be
going
in
soon.
Yeah
diagnostics
and
everything.
That's
here
is
basically
polish,
complete
or
efficiency
assessment,
yeah,
migrations,
tested.
C
C
Yeah,
it's
an
easy
one
and
yeah
meant
to
the
editions
as
well
yeah.
That
was
there
anything
from
for
us
from
the
last
language
meeting.
No,
I
know
no,
yes,
so
I
should
probably.
D
C
Yeah,
I
don't
know
if
this
is
organized.
The
only
thing
that's.
B
C
A
D
A
C
Okay,
yeah,
that
reminds
me.
I
do
have
one
question
about
auditors,
which
I
don't
understand
and
before
I
go
and
wait
okay,
I
did,
I
suppose,
but
I'll
I'll
talk
about
it
as
so,
I
I
was
reading
up
on
auto
trades
and
it
says,
if
t
is
implements
an
order.
Trade,
ampersand,
ampersand,
mutate,
starti
and
star
muti,
implement
that
order
rate
yeah.
I
I
32
implements
an
ascend,
but
like.
A
Auto
traits
can
have
negative
implementations
that
disable
the
automatic
impul
basically,
and
there
is
a
negative
implementation
of
send
for
raw
pointers.
Oh
I
see
is.
A
A
If
you
add
in
a
mutex,
a
mutex
has
an
unsafe
cell
inside
of
it.
There
are
plenty
of
other
types
like
vectors
that
have
raw
pointers
inside
of
them.
What
they
do
is
they
they
explicitly
implement,
send
because
they're
they
wouldn't
be
send
by
default,
but
they
can
opt
back
in
by
implementing
it
themselves.
Okay,.
C
Okay,
yeah,
so,
okay
yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
word
that
in
here
like
this,
just
to
get
some
degree
of
what's
it
called
brief
like
why.
C
A
Okay,
I
have
great
hold
on
I'm
gonna,
stop
this
recording
for
a
second.