►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session Part 2 - 6/5/18
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Monitor
their
if
I
cam,
there
were
actually
two
developments
since
the
last
unresolved
issues
discussion
mere
hours
ago.
So
if
I
could
just
walk
through
those
they're
minor,
but
they
do
affect
sort
of
the
grand
total.
So
the
first
is
that
we
received
information
from
the
county,
which
this
is
the
only
information
that
is
sort
of
still
left
to
the
county
to
deliver
up
to
us,
which
is
the
judgment
levy.
B
If
you
recall,
the
judgment
levy
is
a
one-time,
one-year
property
tax
increase,
so
it's
essentially
one-time
revenue
that
allows
us
to
recoup
lost
property
tax
revenue
from
judgments
in
the
previous
year,
so
we
can
only
charge
what
was
actually
judged
and
that's
why
we
usually
wait
for
the
county
to
give
us
the
number
before
they.
You
know
tell
us
what
we
can
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
There
was
ninety
one
thousand
dollars
more
then
was
actually
judged
against
us
this
last
year.
So
that
means
that
we
have
to
find
ninety
one
thousand
and
offsetting
cuts.
B
We
have
to
reduce
the
judgment
levy.
The
good
news
is,
if
you
can
find
good
news
in
it,
is
that
its
one-time
money,
so
not
that
fund
balance
is
a
great
source
of
revenue,
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
that's
an
obvious
one.
But
if
you
were
to
make
the
one-time
money
for
one-time
revenue
argument,
I
think
this
one
is
one
of
the
stronger
ones.
The
other
thing
is
that
there's
been
some
recent
developments
about
some
clarification
on
exact
amount
of
funding
needed
for
salaries,
and
so
that's
resulted
in
sixty
six
thousand
250
in
savings.
B
Again,
that's
just
one
time,
but
that
could
help
so
staff
went
ahead
and
plugged
both
of
those
in
assuming
that
you
would
likely
want
to
take
that
one-time
salary
savings
to
offset
the
hit
of
the
ninety
one
thousand
dollars
in
judgment
levy.
So
we've
added
those
it
did.
You
know
add
to
your
bottom
line,
unfortunately,
but
not
as
bad
as
it
would
have
been.
So
sorry.
A
D
C
Don't
want
to
dip
into
fund
balance
for
a
previous
discussion
about,
with
the
sixty
six
hundred
forty
eight
thousand,
so
I
was
going
to
propose
that
we
decrease
the
funding
for
the
parks
that
we
allocated
of
by
about
twenty
seven
thousand
the
amount
we
already
gonna
take
from
fund
balance.
What
was
it?
Twenty?
D
C
And
I
thought,
if
that
added
with
the
50
player
me
that's
right,
the
53
would
come
up
with
a
91
give
or
take.
So
you
only
need
to
come
up
with
53,000
right
now
to
balance
the
budget
to
balance
it
without
taking
in
at
the
end
of
fund
balance
or
what
so
I
would
be.
Okay
with
taking
the
53
out
of
fund
balance
in
lieu
of
the
previous
27.
Does
that
make
sense?
Okay,
no.
C
E
C
D
C
I
love
parks,
I
think
we
need
a
very
robust
discussion.
We
have
to
fund
them
frankly,
but
I'm
very,
very
concerned
that,
with
an
eleven
point,
nine
percent
fund
balance
and
all
the
needs
potentially
we're
gonna
have
this
year.
We're
gonna
decrease
it
under
and
if
we
do
that
and
a
good
fun
actually
here
down
to
ten
we're
really
gonna
be
hurting
in
future
years.
When
the
revenue
doesn't
come
in
this
I.
That's
my
real
concern
is
that
anything
we
don't
put
the
fund
balance
we're
gonna
be
cutting
jobs
in
the
future
in
the
city.
C
C
C
E
D
C
F
D
B
With
some
information
that
I
don't
have
verified
yet,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
reluctant
to
chime
in
a
little
bit
but
Mary
Beth
is
pointing
out
that
the
three
FTEs
that
are
part
of
the
parks,
unfunded
maintenance
likely
couldn't
be
hired
right
at
July
1.
So
if
you
assume
that
there
were
two
or
three
months,
a
win
for
Mary
back
I
guess
I'm
a
little
nervous
to
assume
that
that
equals
30,000.
But
it's
probably
close,
and
so
we
could
work
to
verify
that
with
public
services
over
the
next
day
or
two.
B
B
D
B
1200
for
a
pitcher
of
water
next
time,
and
we
will
assume
that
there
will
be
something
less
than
30000
coming
from
savings
in
the
parks,
unfunded
maintenance
and
FTEs
we'll
find
out
in
the
in
the
coming
days.
But
it
will
be
no
more
than
83,000
dollars
from
fund
balance.
It
will
likely
be
closer
to
53,000,
maybe
60,000.
B
F
F
That
my
straw
poll
would
be
that
we
accept
everything
that
we
funded
right
now,
but
that
Mary,
Beth,
John
and
council
staff
will
look
through
some
of
these
different
items
to
see
what
additional
revenue
can
be
captured,
whether
it's
from
parks
or
other
things,
and
not
even
captured
or
just
moved.
If
there's
something
that's
not
going
to
happen
immediately
and
that
we
come
back
next
week
and
whatever
that
number
is.
The
first
thing
that
would
be
on
the
list
to
fund
would
be
the
public
safety
perception
study,
not.
F
A
If
we
kept
this,
as
is
at
this
point,
and
that
any
savings
that
could
be
realized
from
the
reality
of
delayed
hiring
across
the
entire
budget
be
put
toward
the
fund
balance
debt
that
we
are
building
right
now.
So
even
if
it's
more
than
thirty
that
we're
not
picking
off
projects
but
we're
just
reducing
our
83,
the.
F
So
if
we,
if
we
did
that
across
the
board
with
any
of
the
staffing
hires
and
we
moved
it
into
fund
balance,
could
we
easily
move
it
or
remove
it
from
fund
balance
once
those
positions
are
ready
to
be
hired
and
and
or
is,
if
you
move
it
to
fund
balance,
it
stays
in
fund
balance
and
you
would
have
to
revote
on.
Do.
B
F
E
D
F
D
F
And
if
there
is
money,
the
first
thing
that
would
that
would
go
would
be
the
or
the
first
thing
that
would
be
fun.
It
would
be
the
biennial
study
and
then,
however,
much
money
that
if
they
come
back
with,
you
know
seven
million
dollars.
Then
we
can
have
a
lot
of
fun.
I,
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen.
I.
B
F
C
B
C
A
A
B
Think
it
does
I
think
as
long
as
as
long
as
you're,
not
looking
to
I.
Think
the
other
revenue
source,
if
you
didn't
want
to
take
from
fund
balance,
would
be
increasing
property
taxes
and
changing
the
property
tax
rate
on
the
night
of
budget.
Adoption
is
scary
and
we
don't
like
to
do
that
so
I
get
I.
Think
staff
would
be
okay
as
long
as
the
assumption
is
that
you
would,
if
you
weren't,
going
to
take
the
money
from
fund
balance,
it
would
be
coming
from
a
cut
instead
of
from
a
property
tax
revenue
increase.
B
A
C
My
concern
exactly
that's
forgiving
clarity
about
how
we're
gonna
balance
this
budget.
It's
gonna
come
out
that
way.
We
can
count
on
more
revenue,
but
it's
still
gonna
be
spent
somewhere.
So
how
much
is
coming
out
of
fund
balance?
It's
question
really
my
view.
So
III
think
none
of
it
should
I
think
that
we
should
offset
faculty
fund
balance,
hole
and
offset
it
by
some
of
the
things
we
did
today.
Parks
is
in
one
place,
I
could
look
at,
but
well.
A
I'll
say
that
I
think
the
fund
balance
amount
that
we're
at
at
this
point
is
pretty
relative.
It
changes
all
the
time
and
we
haven't
just
achieved
our
12
percent
goal
or
something
that
we're
trying
to
cling
to.
So
this
fund
balance
subsidy
in
our
attempt
to
finalize
the
budget
is
quite
minimal
compared
to
past
years.
I
think
it's
a
very
conservative
direction.
We've
gone
in
compared
to
the
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
that
we've
looked
at
in
past
years,
if
not
more
so
I'm
comfortable
with
this.
G
I'm
comfortable
with
it
too
moving
forward.
I
think
that
for
us,
it's
so
minimal
and
I
know
that
I
know
what
we're
enters
coming
from.
Andrew
is
a
letter
of
the
law
type
guide
that
he
wants,
that
12%
he's
going
to
make
sure
that
we
get
us
there
and
I
get
it.
Andrew
I
really
do.
But
this
is
just
I
understand
where
Chris
is
coming
to
from
too.
But
I
have
a
lot
of
faith
in
what
our
staff
is
going
to
be
able
to
do
and
come
back
with
I.
A
C
Is
not
a
magical
number
for
me,
but
it's
the
intention
we
have
as
a
council,
we
I
know
we're
doing
less
than
previous
years,
but
we
still
have
the
impulse
to
pull
out
of
fund
balance
and
that's
my
concern
I'm
not
saying
that's,
not
good
projects
or
plenty
good
projects,
but
our
impulse
is
to
say
it's
not
that
much
compared
to
other
previous
years.
Let's
just
pull
it
out
of
fund
balance
and
yes,
it
does
flex,
wait.
C
Man,
I'm
sure,
you're,
exactly
right,
sometimes
up
sometimes
down,
but
this
is
the
best
economic
times
we're
gonna
have
and
if
we're
not
willing
to
do
it
now,
we're
not
gonna,
be
one
to
do
it
period.
I
mean
that's,
that's
my
point,
I
guess.
So
it's
a
small
amount
this
year,
I
get
it,
but
if
we're
not
willing
to
do
it
now,
I
can
do
it
next
year,
when
I
can
do
the
year
after
period.
It's
not
going
to
happen.
Madame.
F
Chair,
please
I
totally
understand
where
you're
coming
from
I
feel
the
exact
same
way
every
single
year.
When
we
talk
about
you
know
that
we
want
to
get
to
a
certain
amount
on
streets,
and
we,
you
know,
have
these
aspirational
goals.
We
have
these
ideas
that
we
want
to
do
and
we
never
hit
it,
and
that
is
part
of
that's
to
me
is
one
of
the
most
frustrating
parts
of
this
job,
because
there
are
so
many
different
aspirational
things
that
all
of
us
want
to
get
to
that.
F
There's
there
and
I
don't
care
how
much
you
know
what
we
look
at
cutting.
You
know,
there's
only
so
much.
You
know
we
can
revenue
we
can
raise.
The
reality
is
we
will
never
be
able
to
do
everything
that
we
want
to
do,
and
so
I
I
get
I,
get
it
because
every
single
year,
when
we
don't
fund
streets,
where
you
know
what
our
aspirational
goal
has
been,
it
hurts
every
single
year.
You
know,
and
some
years
we
get
closer
some
years
we
don't.
F
A
Wouldn't
say
it's
not
just
a
little
amount
and
that
my
willingness
is
to
take
from
fund
balance,
but
I
I
want
to
I.
Don't
want
this
meeting
to
end
without
congratulating
this
council
on
supporting
our
parks
that
exist
today
and
not
the
creation
of
a
laundry
list.
That'll
come
in
CIP
of
new
things
that
we
don't
know
how
to
fund
the
maintenance
of
we
filled
more
than
a
half
a
million
dollar
hole
for
our
parks
system
that
wasn't
going
to
see
a
dollar
of
investment
for
maintenance
for
operations
and
maintenance.
D
G
E
E
A
E
A
Support
83
from
fund
balance
all
those
in
support
of
83
if
the
money
isn't
found
from
cost
savings
from
the
realities
of
delayed
hiring,
are
we
supportive
of
83,000
if,
ultimately,
there
isn't
new
money
available
before
next
week?
Yes,
it
includes
the
survey
we've
got
one
down
with
council
member
Johnson.
The
rest
are
in
favor,
I.
Think
that's
a
wrap
unless
anyone
else
has
anything
and.