►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 11/27/2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Jeff
Robins,
thank
you
for
being
with
us.
Jeff
is
the
CEO
of
the
Utah
Sports
Commission
I
know
we
have
rusty
Vetter
sitting
there.
You're
rusty
you're
welcome
to
join
at
any
time
if
you'd
like
to
and
you
must
be
Justin
Toth
with
Ray
Cooney
and
never
occur
as
part
of
the
Salt
Lake
City
Winter
Olympic
exploratory
committee,
but
Jeff
you're,
sitting
alone.
So
we'll
let
you
take
away
the
show
the.
A
B
Absolutely
how
many
were
at
part
of
the
site
visitor
and
the
lunch
I
know
several
were
okay,
so
that
gave
you
a
little
bit
of
an
idea
of
what
happened
with
the
site.
Visit
and
I
took
everybody
through
a
little
bit
of
a
travel
log,
and
so
I'll.
Give
you
a
little
bit
of
an
idea
of
what
happened
during
the
site.
Visit
I.
Think
that
will
give
you
insight
into
what
we
just
went
through
about
end
of
September.
B
We
were
informed
that
there
might
be
a
chance
that
the
USOC
would
visit
some
candidate
cities,
Salt
Lake,
City,
Denver
and
Reno
Tahoe,
and
take
a
quicker
look.
It
was
only
a
day
visit,
so
they
said
we're
just
we're.
Gonna
come
in
and
we're
gonna
come
out,
and
so
they
they
talked
about,
but
we're
not
sure
when
okay
great
so
we
waited
and
waited
waited,
and
we
didn't
find
out
till
about
ten
days
before
they
came
that
they
were
coming.
B
B
In
the
morning
we
went
through
a
series
of
meetings,
more
business
related
with
the
USOC
and
the
executives
we
had
the
chairman,
the
incoming
chairman,
the
president,
somebody
that's
over
bids
and
protocol,
then
somebody
that's
really
more
of
a
government
relations
person
or
the
the
five
that
came
with
us.
So
we
took
him
through
a
series
of
business-related
items
that
we
went
over.
B
We
left
the
grand
America
about
eight
3840,
we
drove
past
the
maverick
Center
talked
about
the
Maverick
center,
pointed
out
that,
as
a
host
site
in
2002
talked
about
that
venue
gave
them
some
insight.
We
created
a
briefing
book
that
all
of
them
got.
So
this
is
the
briefing
book,
so
everything
that
we
did
there
were
three
or
four
pages
about
each
stop.
Biles
on
all
the
people
in
this
briefing
book
that
they
could
follow.
We
ended
up
at
the
Oval
at
about
10:00
to
10:00.
B
It's
been
about
two
hours,
well,
I
guess
maybe
an
hour
there
longer
than
we
were
planning.
Derek
para:
some
of
the
people
were
training
on
the
ice.
Everyone's
really
excited
a
lot
of
photo
ops
showcasing
a
major
venue.
That's
had
terrific
work
done
over
the
years.
Significant
renovation
got
in
the
vehicles,
went
up
to
the
Olympic
Park
spent
about
45
minutes
to
an
hour
then
made
it
down
to
Rice
Eccles
Stadium
in
three
hours.
B
So
by
the
time
we
left
the
Grand
America
made
the
circle,
and
this
included
stops,
got
up
to
the
park
and
made
it
down
back
down
to
our
lunch
at
Rice,
Eccles
Damon
was
11:30.
Now
we
had
the
detail
for
the
governor
driving,
so
they
can,
they
can
drive
a
little
more
quickly,
I'm,
not
saying
they
did
if
they
need
to
so
we
got
down
there
and
they
went
so.
We
did
all
of
that
in
three
hours
and
we
saw
venues
that
have
had
infrastructure
improvements.
B
Sustainability
types
of
things
have
taken
place,
and
then
we
talked
about
what
happened
with
the
airport.
We
showcase
the
airport.
We
talked
about
all
the
transportation,
that's
been
taking
place
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
other
places.
Of
course,
light
rail
now
is
like
a
spider
webbing.
It
didn't
used
to
be
that
way.
During
the
games.
We
had
a
great
lunch
where
we
talked
about
some
of
the
things
that
were
important.
B
We
had
several
guests,
we
talked
about
the
Rice,
Eccles
expansion
talked
about
how
much
investments
being
made
in
Rice
Eccles
we
went
from
Rice
Eccles
is
about
a
two-hour
block
there
and
we
went
over
to
the
convention
center
there
that
the
data
points
were
the
same
thing:
investment
expansion,
sustainability,
solar
panels,
all
playing
into
what
the
Olympics
are
important
in
Olympics
today
in
the
USOC
Scott
Beck
took
us
on
a
tour.
Then
we
went
to
vivid
arena.
B
Gehl
Miller
hosted
us
there
and
we
talked
about
the
hundred
and
twenty
five
million
dollar
renovation
and
went
through
some
of
the
things
and
Gail
came
up
and
said
in
the
meeting
she
said
you
know
want
gathered
the
USOC
executives
and
said:
I
want
you
to
know.
The
Miller
family
has
met
and
talked
about
this,
and
we
were
supportive
we're
on
board.
If
we
get
another
chance,
that's
from
the
Miller
family.
This
wasn't
the
executives
running
the
Miller
organization.
Gail
wanted
them
to
know.
B
This
was
important
to
the
Miller
family
and
they
were
fully
supportive
and
then
we
had
a
unique
experience.
We
thought
it
would
be
fun
at
the
end
of
the
day
to
let
them
go
and
meet
the
legislators
interim
day,
so
we
convened
a
joint
session
of
the
legislature.
We
had
remarks
made
by
the
incoming
speaker
and
president
and
then
Sarah
Hirsch
'ln
who's,
the
president
CEO.
B
She
had
a
standing
ovation
from
both
bodies.
Everyone
both
aisles-
and
she
probably
tell
you
this-
there
were
hurt.
She
was
a
little
misty-eyed.
It
meant
something
different
to
her.
I
sent
the
video
clip
of
that
to
her
and
executives,
and
she
said
that
was
a
remarkable
day.
She
said
I
never
would
have,
would
have
imagined
that
said,
you're
piling
on
all
this
great
stuff,
we've
showcased.
We
got
them
in
vehicles
at
four
or
15
to
catch
flights
that
left
at
5:10,
and
that
was
the
day
and
all
of
you
should
be
proud
about.
B
Salt
Lake
City,
what
we
showcased
everybody
did
a
great
job.
It's
a
team.
This
doesn't
happen
without
a
team
you're,
a
team,
everyone's
part
of
the
team.
You
can't
do
things
like
this
without
a
great
team,
so
that
the
team
that
day
on
all
fronts,
seeks
succeeded
extraordinarily
well,
so
I
was
the
the
purse
there's
over
bids
for
them
and
is
the
lead
person
as
I.
We
got
him
out
of
the
vehicle.
We
said
goodbye.
He
looked
turned
around.
B
He
said
a
plus
a
plus,
he
said
well
done
and,
of
course,
the
airport
officials
were
terrific.
They
made
sure
that
we
had
boarding,
passes
tickets,
helped
them
get
through
TSA,
most
of
them
had
TSA
pre
boarding
and
they
made
their
flights
at
5:10.
So
that's
what
happened
during
the
site
visit,
and
that
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
insight
into
when
somebody
comes
out
from
the
outside
to
a
community
like
ours
at
a
very
high
level
and
leaves
and
says
a
plus,
it's
all
of
us,
it's
the
people.
They
met
at
the
lunch.
B
It's
you
that
they
talked
with
the
lunch.
It's
the
people
that
they
met
at
the
venues,
so
that
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
a
travelogue
of
what
that
day
in
tailed.
A
lot
of
it
was
talking
about
the
details
of
what
a
next
bid
would
look
like
and
they're
three
they're
kind
of
three
segments,
and
you
can
you
can
ask
questions
if
you
want
to
interrupt,
feel
free.
B
That
they're
looking
at
one
is
what
they
call
the
workbook
and
a
workbook
you've
seen
that
I
think
it's
been
shared
with
you,
there's
a
series
of
questions
and
answers
where
they
want
more
information.
They
want
detail
letters
of
support,
venue,
information,
it's
it's
kind
of
mirrors,
the
Olympic
exploratory
report
that
we
created
and
and
then
adds
a
little
additional
information.
So
that's
the
workbook,
that's
the
section
they
wanted
us
to
fill
out.
That
really
is
mechanical.
The
section.
B
The
second
part
was
the
site
visit,
which
they
did
and
I
think
again,
a
plus
work,
but
was
is
terrific
and
they've
said
very
good
things
about
the
workbook
in
the
last
item
is
is
polling.
Of
course,
we've
had
polls
done,
89
percent
by
Dan
Jones
that
supporting
future
bid.
We've
had
other
indicators
from
Olympic
viewership
winter
viewership,
where
it's
extraordinarily
high
in
terms
of
citizens.
Eighty
five
or
twenty
five
percent
of
our
citizens
in
Utah
knew
since
2002.
B
That's
one
data
point
I
talked
about
at
the
luncheon,
so
you've
got
twenty
five
percent,
who
were
not
here
during
2002
who
are
part
of
that
polling
audience
and
so
you're
still
having
89
or
90
percent
numbers.
So
that's
the
last
part
that
they're
looking
at
is
pulling
and
seeing
making
sure
that
the
community
and
those
in
the
community
are
supportive.
B
A
I
I
was
celebrating
my
anniversary
and
I
missed
the
luncheon,
but
I
hear
it
was
really
enjoyable
and
I
appreciate
the
full-day
rendition.
So
that-
and
the
timeline
here
involves
at
the
last
step
you
mentioned,
which
is
the
USOC
mid-december
board
meeting,
and
at
that
point
it
we
have
a
yes,
no
go,
no
go,
which
leads
to
a
further
process
or
not.
A
But
at
this
point
council
members,
you
have
a
two
piece
of
paper:
stapled
in
your
packet:
that's
the
future
Olympic
and
Paralympic
Winter
Games
and
us
candidate,
the
expression
of
interest
agreement
and
that's
what's
before
us
today
to
consider
a
resolution
of
support,
and
it
is
I
think
it's
appropriate
that
we
take
these
steps
in
resolution
format.
If
there
are
future
steps
which
we
will
I
hope
there
will
be,
then
we'll
continue
to
take
them
in
a
resolution
format.
A
But
today
we
have
this
expression
of
interest
agreement,
followed
by
a
letter
to
mayor
but
scoopski
from
the
governor
and
state
leadership
expressing
their
intent
to
enter
into
an
agreement
providing
indemnification
to
Salt
Lake
City,
as
happened
with
the
2002
Olympics.
Those
details
of
the
indemnification,
contract
and
process
are
being
worked
on
and
are
not
necessarily
not
necessary
to
be
worked
out
by
the
today.
For
our
consideration
of
the
resolution.
Correct
me,
where
I'm
wrong
any
editing,
point
Jeff,
correct.
C
A
B
Absolutely
you
know
today,
what
we
would
really
like
to
get
is
is
there's
the
expression
of
interest.
The
resolution
in
front
of
you
that
allows
the
mayor
to
sign
that
letter.
The
governor
and
the
legislature
have
a
strong
letter
of
support
and
that's
really
important
part
of
protocol,
the
USOC
and
the
IOC
and
others.
B
A
A
D
D
B
You
know
once
we
know
if
we're
selected,
then
the
next
steps
will
be
what
games
I
get
asked,
what
we're
gonna
bid.
We
don't
know
for
sure
right
now.
The
2030
is
is
our
best
guess.
Unless
certain
things
change
so
once
we
once
we
decide
what
date
we
would
bid
on,
then
there
will
be
some
more
steps,
but
right
now
this
is
just
really
to
be
selected
by
the
USOC
for
the
the
city
that
would
host
a
future
US
Winter
Games.
My.
E
B
Yeah,
there's
there's
an
indemnification
letter
that
the
governor
will
sign,
which
would
indemnify
Salt
Lake
City,
and
there
will
be
some
other
legal
work
done.
That
rusty
can
talk
to
a
little
bit
more
than
I
can.
But
that
would
be
the
next
steps
if
we
were
going
to
bid
on
a
game.
So
but
again
we
haven't
gotten
into
a
lot
of
detail
right
now
at
the
USOC
on
that.
But
but
the
governor
is
working
on
some
of
those
documents
right
now.
A
D
Usoc
and
IOC
Jeff
mentioned
there's
an
agreement
that
we
signed
actually
in
1990
related
to
the
2002
agreements,
which
was
between
the
state
of
Utah
and
the
City,
essentially
indemnifying
us
and
holding
us
harmless
from
any
issues
really
with
the
Olympic
bid
and
we're
having
discussions
with
the
governor's
office
and
anticipate
that
a
very
similar
agreement
will
be
signed
with
that.
And
then
that
gives
us
the
comfort
we
need
in
order
to
go
forward
with
a
host
city
agreement,
which
is
about
a
700
page
document
with
the
IOC.
D
D
B
And
the
other
thing
that's
nice
about
this
was,
as
with
a
lot
of
things
we
did
for
2002.
We
have
templates
and
we're
not
recreating
the
will
a
lot
of
its
following
the
same
process.
We
did
in
2002
so
and
things
worked
out.
Well
then,
so
we've
got
the
documentation,
we
know
it
was
signed.
We
know
what
the
host
city
agreements
were.
So
much
of
what
you
will
see
is
is
just.
This
is
pretty
much
the
same
that
you
saw
in
2002,
councilmember.
A
B
B
Not
quite
that
long,
but
but
I
do
know
that
we
lost
out
to
Nagano
and
I
was
actually
at
Nagano.
So
the
nice
thing
about
a
lot
of
this
and
what
gives
us
such
a
great
advantage
because
we're
we're
coming
in
and
duplicating
a
lot
of
what
we've
already
done,
and
so
there
aren't
a
lot
of
surprises
cities
that
are
new
to
this.
When
you
go
through
a
seven
hundred
a
hundred
page
document,
when
you
go
through
everything,
we're
going
through
it's
much
much
more
difficult,
they
don't
have
an
existing
budget.
B
D
D
B
I
think
you
know,
Denver
is
a
great
sports
city.
You
know,
I
was
telling
somebody
earlier
I
think
it
was
Charlie
that
you
know
we're
kind
of
focused
on
what
we
can
control
here
and
I
can't
couldn't
worry
about
what
reno/tahoe
was
doing.
I
can't
worry
about
what
Denver's
doing
I
can
control
what
I
can
control,
and
that
is
we've
got
a
great
team
here
and
we
think
we
have
significant
advantages:
I,
don't
I,
don't
really
see
deficits,
especially
when
you
look
at
Calgary
all
of
the
other
cities
you're.
B
Looking
at
right
now,
I,
don't
honestly
see
a
deficit
I
see
opportunity
for
sustainability
transportation.
You
start
looking
at
you
know.
I
was
talking
with
President
Watkins
of
the
U
and
their
slogans.
Imagine
you
right
and
I
said
well
we're
kind
of
reimagining
what
we're
doing
as
well
and
so
I
look
at
the
opportunity.
I'm
not
really
focused
I'm
kind
of
a
Salesman
in
some
ways
too,
but
I
think
there's
so
much
opportunity
to
do
things
different
and
better
than
we
did
last
time.
B
I
would
rather
focus
on
those
kinds
of
things
and
I
can
tell
you
the
the
meetings
with
the
USOC
I
think
they
were
very,
very
impressed,
but
I
don't
see
a
big
deficit
budgets
are
greats.
Venues
are
good,
so
when
you
start
looking
at
it,
there's
always
going
to
minor
things,
but
I
don't
see
a
big
deficit
great.
Thank
you.
One.
C
B
B
B
A
E
A
Celebrate
in
about
three
weeks
time,
when
the
USOC
has
a
board
meeting,
absolutely
thank
you
and
we'll
have
this
on
our
formal
agenda
tonight
for
tentative
council
action
on
that
resolution.
This
takes
us
to
your
ad.
Thank
you.
You
may
be
dismissed.
This
takes
us
to
item
2
on
our
agenda,
which
is
our
budget
amendment
number
2
for
fiscal
year,
1819
I
know
we
have
been
led
key
from
our
council
office
staff
with
us,
Mike
Reid
Berg,
our
director
of
community
and
neighborhoods,
can
come
up
if
he'd
like
to
and
Mary
Beth
Thompson
our
CFO.
A
G
G
A
H
This
is
the
second
briefing
on
budget
amendment
number
two
a
fiscal
year:
nineteen
and
there
is
a
public
hearing
scheduled
tonight,
which
is
the
second
public
hearing
you'll
note
on
the
formal
meeting
agenda
in
your
packet.
There
is
a
motion
sheet
for
partial
adoption.
This
is
related
to
the
police
impact
fees,
to
preserve
options.
Just
want
to
make
you
aware.
A
A
H
Proposes
to
use
420
thousand
dollars
from
fund
balance.
This
would
bring
it
down
to
1.2
million
above
the
ten
percent.
Minimum
threshold
and
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
there's
a
little
over
five
hundred
and
thirty
one
thousand
dollars
in
street
impact
fees
that
are
proposed
to
be
used,
and
this
will
push
out
the
next
refund
date
on
Street
impact
fees
to
April
next
year.
H
The
first
item,
a1,
is
the
Chronos
scope,
change
its
request
for
sixty
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
The
council
originally
funded
this
project
to
expand
Chronos
to
be
used.
Citywide
back
in
budget
amendment
number
five
of
fiscal
year
2017
that
was
an
appropriation
of
three
hundred
and
seventy
seven
thousand
dollars.
If
this
request
for
an
additional
sixty,
seven
thousand
five
hundred
is
approved,
it's
an
18%
increase
in
the
budget
and
the
reason
it's
being
requested
is
there
are
new
modules
being
added.
H
One
of
them
is
Chronos
leave
management
which
improves
the
tracking
for
employee
leave
based
on
type
and
there's
another
new
module
called
Chronos
activities
which
enables
project
specific
time
tracking.
So
you
can
attach
employee
time
to
the
project
they
are
working
on.
There's
also
additional
increases,
since
the
number
of
people
who
would
be
using
it
in
the
city
has
increased,
the
staffing
has
gone
up
and
the
license
is
proportionate
to
the
staffing
who
are
using
Chronos
and
the
annual
maintenance
has
also
gone
up
since
the
original
appropriation.
There's
a
policy
question.
A
I
So
I
don't
pull
that
mic
up.
Mary
got
it.
Thank
you.
So,
back
last
March
or
April,
the
finance
department
took
over
the
implementation
from
HR
for
the
Chronos
activities.
Module
is
something
that
is
a
must.
It
creates
a
job
ledger,
which
is
the
project
activity
codes.
That's
what
we've
been
talking
about
to
monitor
certain
projects,
ie
sales
tax.
I
If
we
had
it,
we
could
have
monitored
operation,
Rio
Grande.
We
can
monitor
certain
specific
projects
associated
with
it
and
it's
related
directly
to
employees.
Time.
If
you
don't
have
the
activities
module,
then
we
will
not
be
able
to
do
that
from
the
chrono
system
into
the
payroll
system,
and
so
it
won't
go
to
the
job
ledger.
It
would
only
go
to
the
general
ledger
side
of
the
activities.
I
We
can
look
at
that.
I
think
that
there
probably
is
attrition
savings
there
either
way
it
the
attrition
savings
is
gonna
fall
to
fund
balance
in
IMS,
or
this
amounts
going
to
come
from
fund
balance
this
actually,
the
67,000
is
actually
coming
from
Isis
fund
balance,
which
is
a
little
bit
different
right.
It's
the
enterprise
fund
balance.
We
have
two
different
funds
inside
the
IMS
fun
class.
One
is
let
me
pause.
You.
A
A
H
Up
is
item
a2.
This
was
a
request
for
an
additional
prosecutor
by
converting
an
existing
office
manager.
The
administration
has
withdrawn
this
request
for
further
evaluation
based
on
the
relocation
into
the
new
District
Attorney's
Office.
The
request
may
come
back
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
next
fiscal
year.
Okay,.
H
Is
a
request
for
$32,000
from
fund
balance
for
janitorial
and
utilities
at
the
community
connection
center,
the
facilities
division
has
been
providing
these
services
and
then
billing
the
police
department.
For
them.
This
$32,000
was
inadvertently
not
included
in
the
consolidated
homeless
funding
in
the
can
Department
operating
budget
in
the
fiscal
in
the
annual
budget,
so
it
should
have
been
included,
but
it
was
not
this
time
around
I.
I
So
we
haven't
considered
that,
but
we
can
go
back
and
see
what
that
is,
then
we
we
would
still
need
to
move
that
money
because
those
vacancies
in
the
CCC
are
in
the
police
department.
We
would
need
to
move
that
from
the
police
department
into
public
services
for
that
operations.
That's
fantastic!
Okay,.
E
D
E
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
council
member.
We
have
not
had
those
conversations
yet,
as
you
know,
with
operation
Rio
Grande,
there
was
a
shift
in
how
the
community
connection
center
operated,
moving
away
from
just
being
a
location
where
individuals
come
to
services
and
more
as
a
kind
of
a
location
to
spread
out
throughout
the
city
and
stop
with
the
cull
responder
model
and
so
with
the
two
new
resource
centers
coming
online
in
June
unsure.
Yet
how
that's
going
to
change
the
model
right
now
or
the
location
needs
of
the
community
connection
center?
J
H
Is
recognition
of
a
forty
five
thousand
dollar
donation?
That's
expected
from
the
Utah
Youth
Soccer
Association.
This
is
in
relation
to
a
project
to
the
council,
funded
in
fiscal
year
18
and
again
in
fiscal
year,
19
CIP,
it's
lighting
of
two
fields
at
the
Regional
Athletic
Complex
and
each
field
has
four
structures
for
the
lighting.
H
H
Is
a
request
for
a
justement
to
the
staffing
document
for
hand
to
create
a
new
FTE?
This
would
be
ongoing.
The
title
is
the
Community
Development
grant
administrator.
The
position
would
be
fully
funded
through
CDBG
funds,
which
are
received
from
HUD
each
year.
The
fully
loaded
cost
is
estimated
at
ninety
seven
thousand
three
hundred
and
seventy
three
dollars
each
year.
The
last
several
years
that
I've
been
here.
The
council
has
approved
20%
of
the
CDBG
grant
to
go
toward
administration
and
program
costs,
which
is
the
maximum
amount
allowed
by
HUDs
rules.
H
So
this
position
would
be
fully
funded
out
of
that
20
percent
of
CDBG
each
year.
There
are
two
policy
questions.
The
first
is:
if
we're
hitting
a
theme
here,
vacancy
savings
could
be
used
to
cover
the
cost.
For
the
second
half
of
this
fiscal
year.
There
are
currently
three
vacancies
in
hand,
including
a
deputy
director
level.
The
other
policy
question
is
if
the
council
would
like
to
hear
more
about
why
using
CDBG
funds
are
preferable
to
splitting
funding
for
this
position
between
CDBG
and
general
fund.
H
I
G
A
The
creation
of
that
FTE
affect
the
funding.
Let
me
rephrase
that
the
deputy
director
position
that
is
currently
vacant,
that
the
council
had
put
intention
behind
to
create
a
master
plan,
implementation
position,
which
I
know
the
deputy
director
position
or
I
believe
that
deputy
director
position
partially
encompassed.
Yes,.
H
H
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
funding
was
a
result,
so
we're
kind
of
rebalancing
of
the
sales
tax
so
where,
before
we
had
our
federally
funded
employees
that
were
working
on
federal
grants,
all
the
time
were
paid
for
that
in
order
to
increase
Kapiti,
we
wanted
to
blend
their
funding
with
general
fund
dollars.
It
was
allocated
through
sales
tax
and
then
add
the
position
of
federally
funding
dollars.
It
would
not
change
to
get
to
your
point
in
question.
C
It
would
not
change
the
roles
and
responsibilities
related
to
master
plan,
implementation
or
other
any
other
role
that
is
currently
vacant.
What
it
would
do
is
allow
us
to
for
the
regulatory
aspects
that
have
been
different
furred
in
order
to
absorb
the
sales
tax
responsibilities
to
backfill
that
focus.
I
A
I
want
to
get
a
straw
poll
on
council
support
or
non
support
of
creating
this
FTE
position,
and
we
can
hear
back
from
Marybeth
at
our
next
meeting
about
the
potential
to
use
vacancy
savings,
for
at
least
a
portion
of
that.
So
can
I
get
a
thumbs
up
from
councilmembers
who
support
the
creation
of
this
full-time
position
in
hand.
A
G
A
H
Is
a
request
to
use
just
over
five
hundred
thirty
one
thousand
dollars
of
Street
impact
fees?
This
is
an
add-on
to
the
900
South
reconstruction
project.
It
would
be
for
adding
a
roundabout.
The
transportation
division
did
a
pop-up
process
earlier
this
year
of
several
different
configurations,
and
it
was
determined
that
the
roundabout
was
the
most
preferred
by
the
community,
but
also
improved
to
several
of
the
traffic
metrics,
such
as
how
long
vehicles
were
waiting
at
the
intersection.
H
Is
a
building
space
needs
assessment?
It's
a
request
for
$100,000
from
fund
balance.
If
approved,
the
administration
would
issue
an
RFP
for
a
space
planning
consultant,
they
would
look
at
all
city
facilities
that
are
covered
by
the
general
fund
departments
and
internal
service
funds.
This
would
not
include
the
enterprise
funds
like
golf
and
Airport.
The
consultant
would
have
deliverables
of
preliminary
designs,
cost
estimates
as
well
as
a
building
vulnerability
assessment,
and
these
would
be
used
for
long-term
planning
of
city
facilities.
This
is
the
first
that
we're
aware
of
that.
H
A
E
E
K
I
mean
I
I,
wasn't
gonna,
say
anything
because
I
agree
with
madam
chair
that
this
informs
a
couple
of
other
things
and
mostly
a13.
For
me,
me
too,
and
I
know
that
we
are
running
out
of
space
for
a
lot
of
our
departments
and
that
we
haven't
looked
at
really
where
and
who
should
be
going
where
right,
like
which
department
should
be
where
and
and
what
buildings
we
have
available
for
different
departments.
K
So
for
me,
I
understand
the
issue
of
fund
balance,
but
we
also
have
an
issue
where
people
aren't
being
are
getting
to
a
point
where
they're
crammed
enough
that
we
need
to
do
something
about
it
and
I
would
rather
do
something
where
it
we
include
a
study,
so
we
know
where
people
should
actually
be
going
than
just
guess
and
that's
a
good.
This
takes
out
the
guessing
part
for
me,
but
then
it
does
so
that's
a
so.
A
H
Twelve,
the
council
might
recognize
from
CIP
this
year.
It's
the
Washington
Square
master
plan.
The
council
did
fund
this
in
CIP
at
the
seventy
five
thousand
dollar
level
and
expanded
the
scope
to
include
two
hundred
East
and
Library
Square
to
look
at
the
creation
of
a
new
downtown
park.
So
this
item
has
been
funded
and
it's
included
in
here
because
this
transmittal
was
sent
before
CIP
was
adopted.
H
Thirteen
is
a
request
to
use
$50,000
from
fund
balance
for
carpet
and
paint
at
the
fifth
floor
of
Plaza
349.
This
spring,
the
prosecutor's
office
relocated
out
of
the
fifth
floor
to
the
district
attorney's
office
new
building.
At
the
time
council
staff
asked
what
the
cost
would
be
for
a
basic
remodel.
It
was
a
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
dollars
for
new
carpet
and
paint.
H
The
reason
this
request
is
only
$50,000
is
because,
in
the
fiscal
year
19
annual
budget,
the
board
approved
$200,000
for
the
RDA
for
furniture,
fixtures
and
equipment,
so
that,
if
approved
this
50,000
plus
the
200,000
in
the
RDA
would
be
a
quarter
million
for
the
fifth
floor,
remodel
for
the
RDA
and
economic
development
to
move
into.
There
are
several
policy
questions
on
this
item
just
to
go
over
them
quickly.
Actually,.
K
Think
in
part
in
looking
at
who
we
communicate
what
makes
the
most
sense
and
so
I
don't
think
that
spending
fifty
thousand
dollars
on
paint
and
carpet
when
potentially
there
may
be
a
complete
remodel
somewhere
else
and
a
reallocation
of
money
somewhere
else,
so
that
a
different
Department
can
go
over
there
I
think
that
so
my
support
I
would
not
support
this
fifty
thousand
for
carpet
in
paint
but
support
the
one
hundred
thousand
so
that
we
can
actually
figure
out
where
a
department
should
go
and
which
department
should
go
there.
Councilmember.
D
A
Want
to
say
that
I'm
philosophically
opposed
to
the
RDA
leaving
this
building
period
and
when
I
voted.
Yes
to
allocate
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
RDA
budget
to
help
them
fit
better
in
the
space
that
they
have.
That's
what
it
was
about,
not
about
stocking
away
money
to
get
out
of
this
building.
So
philosophically
I'm
not
going
to
support
the
RDA
leaving.
A
You
can
move
a
jar
out
of
this
building
to
the
349
there's
other
departments
and
divisions
that
don't
have
to
work
in
such
an
integrated
way
with
housing
and
neighborhoods
and
the
City
Council
office
and
the
mayor's
administration,
but
I'm
never
going
to
support
the
RDA
moving
out
of
here.
Councilmember
luke.
Thank.
D
D
G
Madam
chair,
if
I
could
clarify
I,
think
it's
not
fifty
thousand
to
make
that
floor.
Usable
I
think
it's
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
because
it
would
be
combined
with
the
two
hundred,
because
the
two
hundred
thousand
from
the
RDA
is
still
is,
would
still
need
to
be
spent
to
make
that
usable
from
the
city.
Two
hundred
from
the
RDA
need.
D
E
J
J
Are
in
the
process
of
doing
the
cost
estimates
right
now
we
have
two
hundred
thousand
set
aside
in
the
agency
budget,
essentially
for
furniture,
fixtures
and
equipment.
When
we
put
in
this
request
for
fifty
thousand,
we
did
not
necessarily
know
what
the
costs
were
going
to
be
to
utilize
that
space,
this
50
thousand
is
not
necessarily
needed
at
this
point,
it
looks
like
really.
All
we
need
to
do
is
pay
carpet
in
the
area.
There's
a
lot
of
furniture
that
was
left
over
that
we
can
utilize
immediately.
J
So
we
don't
necessarily
have
as
big
of
a
budget
demand,
we're
probably
looking
at
a
total
cost
of
between
150
and
180
thousand,
which
we
could
then
arguably
cover
with
the
existing
agency
funds
as
part
of
the
question
of
what
to
do
with
this
50,000.
If
we
didn't
get
that,
then
obviously
we
can
move
forward
with
improving
the
space
on
a
temporary
basis
without
it,
I
want.
K
Think
a
couple
of
things:
it
is
important
that
RDA
and
economic
development
have
this
base
that
they
need
to
work.
I
go
up
there
often,
and
there
is
not
a
lot
of
space,
and
so
I
think
that
we
are
certain
I'm,
supportive
of
making
sure
that
they
are
in
a
work
environment
that
makes
sense
to
them
so
I'm
happy
to
see
what
we
can
do
about
that,
but
also
I
recognize
the
limitations
that
are
there.
K
The
important
part
is
that
we're
doing
a
full
step
for
me
is
that
we're
doing
a
full
study
so
that
we
don't
have
this
come
up
with
another
department
where
we're
just
trying
to
move
somebody
so
that
so
that
they
can
actually
do
their
work.
The
way
that
they
need
to
do
their
work
so
I
mean
I'm
I'm,
happy
to
entertain
that
yes,
but.
A
I
think
for
me
it's
that
in
here
Danny
say
that
you
don't
need
the
50,000
necessarily
you
already
have
the
200,000
and
you
and
your
staff
see
in
the
budget
allocation
that
you
could
use
it
to
move.
I
feel
that
we
expressed
some
serious
sentiment.
A
few
of
us
did
about
not
wanting
the
RDA
to
leave
this
building
and
the
only
tool
we
have
to
talk
about
what
dollars
they
can
use
or
can't
use
to
equip
a
different
office
somewhere
else.
So
maybe
in
the
interim
beat
until
the
building
space
needs
assessment
is
completed.
G
H
Answer
councilmember
Rogers
questions.
We
asked
back
in
the
spring
what
the
square
footage
was
of
the
floor
and
the
cost
per
square
foot.
The
answer
we
received
is
there's
approximately
13,000
square
feet
of
usable
space
on
the
fifth
floor.
If
it
was
rented
out
currently
it
would,
it
would
be
Class
C,
very
low
grade
office
space
and
for
the
investment
of
the
carpet
and
paint
it
would
bring
it
out
to
be
about
11
or
12
dollars
per
square
foot,
which.
A
H
14
is
a
$25,000
request
from
fund
balance
as
a
local
match
for
the
surplus
canal
levee
study.
This
is
to
look
at
reconstructing
a
segment
of
the
levy
adjacent
to
wing
point
golf
course.
It's
part
of
a
larger
project.
That's
looking
at
making
repairs
along
the
entire
length
of
the
18
mile
surplus
canal,
it's
being
led
by
Salt
Lake
County,
since
the
canal
is
a
flood
control
facility
of
the
county.
H
The
deficiencies
next
to
wing
point
golf
course
were
identified
by
the
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
and
the
reason
it
is
the
responsibility
of
the
city
is
the
deficiencies
are
alleged
to
be
related
to
work
performed
in
1988
by
the
city.
The
current
estimate
to
reconstruct
that
segment
is
just
under
5.2
million
dollars.
This
study,
if
funded,
wait,
identify
her.
Natives
are
expected
to
be
significantly
less
than
a
full
reconstruction
of
that
segment.
H
H
A
I
That's
right,
so
this
I
will
just
read
the
text
of
what
should
have
been
in
that
area
and
I
apologize
that
there
was
an
error,
so
this
would
be
a
15
part-time
employee
for
economic
development.
Related
events
general
fund
$25,000
Department,
is
economic
development
prepared
by
Ben
:
der
this
position
is
being
requested
due
to
a
temporary
increase
in
the
number
of
events
coming
to
Salt
Lake
City
in
2018
and
2019.
The
economic
development
department
will
likely
request
a
short-term
extension
through
the
end
of
2019
during
the
regular
budget
cycle.
I
The
position
is
intended
to
be
part-time
and
not
have
ongoing
funding
beyond
the
follow-on
request
in
the
budget
cycle.
Because
of
the
timing,
the
council
will
see
the
second
half
of
this
request
in
the
FY
2010
--tz--.
This
position
will
be
working
on
include
future
forum
site
selectors
guild,
the
United
Nations
DPI
NGO
potential.
Additional
events
based
on
recent
inquiries
include
the
NBA
all-star
game,
the
Olympics
and
FIFA
2026.
I
A
A
A
A
I
think
that
there
isn't
a
lot
of
discussion
on
that
one,
because
we've
submitted
questions
to
the
administration
that
there
I
think
working
on
getting
us
some
written
single
voice
answers
to
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
those
but
that's
item,
818,
I,
believe
a
16
and
17.
We
addressed
with
a
straw
poll.
Did
we
address
both
of
those
and
with.
A
G
A
H
There
are
also
two
council
added
items
to
the
budget
amendment.
The
first
one
was
previously
discussed
in
announcements.
It's
adding
$13,000
from
fund
balance
for
a
bilingual
dual-mode
survey
to
include
a
telephone
components,
so
this
is
adding
that
to
the
budget
amendment
as
the
council
directed.
The
second
is
an
adjustment
to
the
council
office
staffing
document.
This
is
to
add
to
FTEs.
A
A
You
and
thank
you
Mary
Beth,
Ann,
Allison
and
everyone
else
who
is
here
to
help
us
answer
those
questions.
This
takes
us
to
item
3,
the
council
member
compensation,
discussion.
I,
know
Jennifer
well
Jennifer
Bruno's
on
here,
but
it
doesn't
look
like
you're
planning
on
coming
up,
I,
think
Cindy,
Gus
Jensen
is
going
to
help
us
through
and
I
believe
we
have
a
PowerPoint.
A
F
F
One
of
the
first
tools
that
is
used
in
establishing
salaries
for
employees
at
least,
is
a
salary
survey,
and
we
so
we
over
the
years
tried
a
salary
survey
with
elected
official
positions
and
it
was
very,
very
difficult
to
find
appropriate
matches
and
the
reasons
are
fairly
obvious.
But
let
me
just
say
the
the
form
of
government
is
a
bit
unique.
There
are
a
lot
of
council-manager
forms.
There
are
a
lot
of
other
forms
that
it
was
difficult
to
find
cities
of
our
size
that
had
this
type
of
form
of
government.
F
Also,
we
have
a
relatively
small
population
compared
to
the
major
role
that
Salt
Lake
City
plays
as
a
capital
city
and
a
regional
hub
and
there's
just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
silly
illustration.
There
was
one
point
at
which,
when
I
was
checking
these
this
was
years
ago,
but
I
was
checking
the
cities
to
which
we
were
comparing
and
saying
this.
This
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
I'm,
gonna,
go
in
and
just
look
up
each
city
and
see
what
their
characteristics
are.
These
are
our
closest
matches.
F
One
of
the
cities
had
an
airport
that
was
just
a
general
aviation
Airport
and
they
had
a
crop,
duster
and
private
planes,
and
so
that's
a
little
different
than
having
an
International
Airport
and
then
another
was
a
city
that
had
a
bookmobile
service
as
opposed
to
a
library
system.
So
that's
been
a
long
time
ago.
F
It's
not
recent,
but
I
thought
it
kind
of
gives
you
an
interesting
illustration
about
how
how
it
is
a
bit
difficult
to
find
places
that
totally
match
Salt
Lake
City
and
then
another
thing
that
we've
been
looking
at
with
this
is
that
there
have
been
a
lot
of
changes
in
councilmember
rolls.
The
the
the
City
Council
member
salary
was
set
up
at
first
in
1980
and
then
modified
in
1982.
It
was
set
up
with
so
that
it
was
one.
Fourth
of
the
mayor's
salary
and
the
idea
I
hate
to
say
it
I
was
here.
F
So
two
nights
a
week
in
the
evenings
is
what
the
council
was
committed
to
and
if
there
were
times
when
the
council
needed
to
have
special
meetings
with
administrative
staff
or
things
like
that,
the
administration
would
accommodate
that
with
evening
having
the
staff
people
stay
in
the
evenings,
and
so
that
was
really
costly.
I
think
for
the
morale
of
the
city,
employees
and
for
the
ability
for
them
to
you
know,
keep
going.
You
can
only
work,
50
or
60
hours
a
week
for
so
long
and
and
then
overtime.
F
So
so
the
burden
in
a
sense
has
shifted
so
that
if
you
have
a
full-time
job,
that's
daytime
hours,
there's
a
cost,
probably
to
you,
as
opposed
to
the
city
government,
to
attend
those
meetings.
So
so
you
are
not
able
to
attend.
I
say
you,
I
mean
council.
Members
are
not
able
to
attend
their
work
during
those
hours.
F
One
extreme
is
that
public
service
should
just
be
compensated
minimally,
it's
a
public
service
and
it
should
be
voluntary
to
some
extent.
Now
the
opposite
view
of
that
is,
or
a
consequence
of
that
perhaps
is
that
you
could
inadvertently
limit
the
pool
of
people
who
can
serve,
who
are
able
to
serve
and
and
if,
if
I,
look
at
the
council's
over
time,
the
first
council
that
I
worked
for
had
two
teachers.
F
One
was
a
college
teacher
that
taught
during
the
day
and
one
was
a
high
school
teacher
and
they
could
manage
the
the
council
role
because
they
came
at
night
after
they
had
completed
their
workday
now.
I
think
it
would
be
costly
for
a
teacher
to
serve
because,
after
they've
run
out
of
their
days
of
vacation
or
whatever
it
is,
they
have
they.
They
would
need
then
to
go
without
pay
at
their
job
or
pay
a
substitute
or
that
type
of
a
thing
so
so
overtime.
F
The
nature,
the
type
of
folks
who
have
access
to
the
office
might
be
changing.
It
there's
a
danger
that
you
can
get
into
a
situation
where
only
people
of
means
can
serve
and
that's
typically,
not
a
healthy
public
policy
approach,
but
it
kind
of
goes
hand-in-hand
with
the
idea
that
public
service
is
either
a
volunteer
or
should
be
compensated
very
minimally
or
say
with
a
stipend
that
type
of
thing.
F
There's
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
about.
You
want
to
look
for
that
sweet
spot
where
you're
looking
for
a
salary,
that's
fair
to
the
taxpayers
and
a
salary
that
is
fair
to
the
office
holders,
so
that
the
office
holders
are
not
having
expenses
that
far
far
exceed
what
they're
a
reasonable
amount
compared
to
the
salary
they're.
Getting
another
interesting
value
thought
is
that,
because
it
is
such
a
painful
topic,
there's
one
school
of
thought.
That
is,
let's
just
not
talk
about
this.
F
Let's
do
it
very
infrequently,
so
it
isn't
bothersome
upsetting
to
the
taxpayers
or
upsetting
to
the
elected
officials.
Another
school
of
thought
is
that
it's
better
to
have
a
public
awareness
of
the
salaries
and
regular
opportunities
to
comment
and
I'll
say
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
finally
completed
this
this
work
and
looked
for
the
best
way
that
we
could
to
present
it
to
you
is
there
will
be
a
vacancy
in
district
4
and
we
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
your
attention
in
case
there.
F
Some
examples
of
that
on
the
next
slide,
when
the
form
of
government
was
first
established,
the
number
of
community
councils
in
the
city
was
limited
to
8
and
it
was
limited
by
ordinance,
and
so
the
seven
City
Council
members
just
had
8
community
councils
to
cover
among
them.
So
that
was
really
pretty
easy
and
didn't
take
a
lot
of
time.
At
this
point
there
are
27
recognized
community
groups,
city
council
districts
have
between
3
and
8
community
councils.
F
Any
any
group
can
form
there's
no
limitation
or
anything
like
that.
So
there
there's
a
natural
increase
in
what
it
takes
to
to
engage
with
constituents,
and
then
this,
in
addition
to
what
I
was
talking
about
with
the
schedule,
shifting
to
day
time,
to
a
great
extent,
there's
also
a
change
a
bit
in
the
role
council.
F
Members
are
now
pretty
regularly
asked
to
serve
on
committees
and
boards
in
the
community,
and
these
are
just
the
ones
that
I
could
think
of
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
there
are
several
committees
relating
to
housing
and
homelessness.
There's
a
Wasatch
Front
regional
council
that
the
City
Council
has
a
seat
on
there's
the
Utah
League
of
cities
and
towns.
We
currently
have
a
member
of
the
Council
serving
on
that
and
we
have
previously
had
people
serve
in
officer
positions
with
the
league
and
that's
an
additional
time
commitment.
F
The
chair
is
now
part
of
the
Chamber
of
Commerce
that
didn't
used
to
be
the
case.
We
have
the
downtown
Alliance
now
that
has
I
think
at
least
three
committees
that
the
council
member
from
the
area.
It's
hoped
that
they
will
attend
those.
We
have
had
council
members
serving
on
the
quality
growth
Commission.
We
have
someone
on
the
inland
port
board,
someone
on
the
air
quality
board,
so
there's
a
lot
a
lot
that
has
evolved
over
time
with
the
council
so
before
I
get
to
the
the
options
that
we
just
listed
for
you
to
consider.
F
F
So
the
mayor
and
council
members,
salary
and
see
has
that
changed
and
the
peculiar
thing
it's
it's
peculiar,
not
by
anyone's
fault,
but
just
the
situation
is
that
that
the
ratio
has
changed
so
now
the
council
compensation
is
I,
believe
less
than
20%
of
the
mayor's
salary,
as
opposed
to
25
as
what
it
was,
and
part
of
that
is
just
that.
The
council,
at
one
point,
did
adjust
the
mayor's
salary
they
looked
comprehensively
at
the
mayor's
salary
and
council
salaries.
F
F
So
one
thing
you
could
do
is
you
could
look
at
that
ratio
and
restore
it
to
what
it
was
originally
so?
Not
only
is
your
time
increasing
that
is
spent
as
an
elected
city,
council
member,
but
your
salary,
as
a
ratio
of
the
mayor's
salary
is
less
we
we
can
quantify
the
time
spent
now
as
being
different.
F
We
can
look
at
the
county
council
salary
so
that
it's
not
identical,
but
there
there's
there
greater
responsibilities
in
the
county
in
some
cases,
but
they're
unique
aspects
to
the
city
as
well,
with
the
International
Airport,
with
the
extraterritorial
jurisdiction
on
watershed,
with
providing
water
outside
of
city
limits
with
the
Broadway
theater
those
kinds
of
things.
So
there
there
are
I
think
there
are
reasons
that
you
could
at
least
as
a
touchstone
look
look
to
the
county
salary.
F
F
This
is
kind
of
a
strange
thing
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
might
want
to
re-evaluate
it,
but
people
who
are
city
department,
heads
will
city
employees,
city
department,
heads
mayor,
they
have
the
opportunity
to
get
vacation
and
the
department
heads
in
mayor
have
the
opportunity
to
receive
a
an
auto
allowance.
The
council
members.
As
elected
officials,
you
pay
your
own
expenses
for
any
transportation.
You
aren't
eligible
for
the
auto
allowance
and
then
the
vacation
pay.
F
F
So
that's
that's
a
policy,
that's
internal,
that
the
council
is
established
and,
and
you
could
change
you
could
change
that
if
you
wanted
to
and
then
one
other
thought
is
that
there
are
some
councils
that
have
a
differential,
that
they
pay
to
their
leadership
positions
based
on
the
additional
time
that
is
spent
with
the
RTA
chair
and
Vice
Chair
and
the
city
council,
chair
and
vice-chair.
So
those
are
all
pieces
of
information
for
you.
The
end.
A
Thanks
Cindy
I
think
that
while
we
usually,
we
don't
typically
have
Cindy
do
staff
presentations.
She
is
the
staff
member
who's
been
here
for
30
years,
actually
even
a
little
bit
before
that
for
a
moment
and
has
the
context
of
the
awkwardness
of
these
political
conversations
around
adjust
one's
own
pay.
And
yet
it's
been
several
years
that
the
council
has
talked
about
in
a
very
awkward
format.
A
We
embody
that
in
so
many
ways
through
all
of
our
departments
and
our
investments,
our
investments
in
our
youth
to
the
arts,
to
bringing
the
UN
here
to
have
conversations
on
a
global
level,
and
yet
we
may
inadvertently
be
limiting
the
pool
of
people,
the
limiting
the
diversity
that
can
access
this
entry-level
position
as
I
consider
City
Council
offices
to
be,
and
it
is
a
lot
of
work.
It
is
a
lot
of
time.
An
hour
represents
desert
our
rep.
Our
residents
deserve
that
representation
from
us
I.
Think.
A
K
So
this
is
gonna,
be
for
you
Cindy,
the
four
to
one
ratio.
When
that
discussion
happened,
it
makes
sense,
given
the
part
time
versus
full
time,
and
that
was
in
a
staff
report
that
was
prepared
and
distributed
to
us
earlier.
You
mentioned
that
this
ratio
hasn't
been
followed
in
part.
Do
you
think
that's
because
of
the
difficult
conversation
it
is
for
council
members
to
have
this,
and
so
it
just
has
never
been
really
addressed
before.
F
Yes,
there
was
a
time
when
there
was
actually
an
increase
recommended,
and
the
council
said
not
not
right.
Now,
let's
wait,
let's
discuss
it
in
a
couple
of
years
and
that
couple
of
years
became
a
door.
Can
I,
don't
know
how
many
so
this
is
as
far
as
I
can
think.
This
is
the
next
discussion
that
we've
had
before
you.
K
F
Yeah
I,
probably
can't
accurately
do
that.
I,
just
remember
that
they
were
thinking
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
time
that
the
council
would
spend
and
then
trying
to
think
of
it
as
like
10
hours
a
week
or
so
what
what
was
what's
interesting
to
me,
we
I
was
trying
to
think
of
all
the
different
ways
that
you
could
look
at
this
and
I
I
started
looking
at.
F
What's
the
number
of
hours
council
members
spend
per
week
and
one
of
the
values
that
the
council
member,
the
public
voted
for
originally
in
establishing
the
form
of
government
was
to
have
a
citizen
council
and
to
have
it
be
part-time.
So,
when
I
got
to
adding
up
the
hours-
and
sometimes
it
equalled
40
that
well,
that's
not
going
to
be
a
good
calculation.
F
That's
not
so
so
when
I'm
saying
that
I
don't
want
to
have
anyone
infer
from
what
I'm
saying
that
the
council
still
spends
10
hours
a
week
or
even
that
the
City
Council
spends
only
20
hours
a
week.
There
are
times
of
year,
like
during
the
budget
or
during
the
legislative
session,
where
their
council
members
spending
in
excess
of
40
hours,
but
it
still
is
a
part-time
position
and-
and
that's
that's-
that's
how
it
was
established
and
it
seems
to
be
a
core
value.
Sorry,
I,
don't
know
any.
D
F
A
A
I
have
to
tell
you
how
grateful
I
am
for
the
ability
you
each
have
and
the
skill
that
you
bring
to
the
service
representing
our
residents
in
Salt
Lake
City,
on
a
statewide
level,
on
a
county
level
and
in
in
critical
conversations
that
are
absolutely
about
the
benefit
of
our
residents
today
and
in
the
future.
And
if
you
weren't
in
those
conversations,
I,
don't
I
I
can't
imagine
that
the
capital
city
wouldn't
be
included
in
those
conversations.
E
E
I'll
Descamps
nth
that
I
I
support
the
ratio
concept.
We
can
talk
through
what
that
means
and
the
the
exact
ratios
I
know
just
from
a
personal
experience
to
disclose,
and
this
wouldn't
be
possible
without
compensation.
Frankly,
I
mean
I
have
an
employer
who
allows
me
some
time
to
flex
my
schedule,
but
every
hour
I'm
here
I
have
to
make
up
somewhere
else
in
my
week
my
job
and
I
think
that's
important,
but
the
second
piece
is
important.
E
My
time,
my
other
job
my
day
job,
my
kids
I
have
two
kids,
my
wife
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
other
things
to
factor
in,
and
so
the
quality
of
representation
sometimes
reflects
the
amount
of
time
you
have
obviously
I
mean.
Then
we
miss
that
sometimes,
if
I'm
willing
to
check
my
emails
on
a
daily
basis
to
fall
upon
constituent
issues,
that's
time,
I
have
to
find
someplace.
E
Maybe
I
don't
sleep,
maybe
I
don't
do
someone
else,
but
if
there's
time
to
go
to
the
meetings,
if
there's
time
to
meet
with
constituents
about
things,
if
there's
time
to
serve
on
commissions
that
benefit
the
city
and
I'm
thinking
of
James
Rogers
on
the
northwest,
quadrant
Commission
or
quality
growth
or
anybody
else.
Who
does
something
that
directly
impacts
the
quality
of
life
in
the
city,
but
demands
a
lot
of
time,
and
so
we
can
have
less
time
in
this
job.
E
But
there's
also
going
to
be
a
trade-off.
There's
gonna
be
a
trade-off
on
what
we
influence
in
our
neighborhoods
and
our
communities
on
the
state
level.
There's
a
trade-off
in
how
many
times
we
can
with
people
in
our
neighborhoods
there's
a
trade-off
in
just
the
time
you
have
available
so
I'm
sensitive
to
the
nature
of
this
I.
Get
it
I'm,
also
sensitive
to
what
chairman
and
Hall
has
talked
about
that
increasingly,
it's
hard
to
make
ends
meet
period
with
one
job,
and
if
your
second
job
doesn't
pay,
it
may
be
impossible
for
most
folks
I.
E
Just
talk
from
my
neighborhood
in
my
experience,
I
think
we
are
going
to
lose
people
who
may
otherwise
be
willing
to
look
at
it
and
try.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
up.
Thank
you
for
Cindy
for
the
historical
reference
I,
don't
know
as
a
teacher.
How
I
could
do
it
period
frankly,
so
I
appreciate
that
perspective
and
I
also
will
appreciate
a
lot
of
feedback
from
them
from
the
public
and
let's
talk
through
this
and
hear
their
thoughts.
Let's
hear
what
their
impressions
are
and
let's
hear
what
they
would
think
about
trade-offs
as
well.
E
A
A
Okay,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
funding
our
future
interlocal
agreement
with
the
Utah
Transit
Authority.
I'm.
Sorry
for
the
time
cut
short
a
little
bit.
We
do
have
a
six
o'clock
commitment
downstairs,
but
we
have
Kiera
Luke
from
our
office
been
led
key
from
council
staff,
also
Jennifer
McGrath.
Maybe
it's
in
the
audience:
John
Larson
and
Julian
Sabula
from
the
transit
division,
transportation.
C
I'll
jump
right
in
with
my
intro,
while
everyone's
getting
settled
just
to
add
a
little
context
from
the
whole
funding
our
future
piece
of
the
conversation
in
May
of
this
year,
the
council
approved
a
point:
five
percent
sales
tax
increase
to
address
for
critical
unfunded
needs,
one
of
which
is
improved
transit
service.
As
part
of
the
annual
budget
process,
the
council
allocated
over
five
million
to
the
goal
of
improved
transit
service,
2.8
million
of
which
was
identified
for
year,
one
of
an
agreement
with
UTA
in
the
contingent
appropriation
for
this
funding.
C
The
council
identified
specific
routes
and
policy
guidelines
for
this
agreement.
Since
that
process
was
set
in
motion,
the
administration
and
UTA
have
been
working
to
create
this
agreement
to
implement
the
city
services
by
August
of
2019.
We've
been
informed
that
to
meet
this
deadline,
the
agreement
needs
to
be
adopted
no
later
than
January
2019
with
the
administration.
We
originally
planned
to
schedule
that
allowed
for
two
briefings
to
discuss
the
interlocal
agreement
and
set
a
public
hearing
for
tonight
with
hopes
of
the
December
11th
adoption.
C
Last
week
the
administration
provided
the
resolution
for
adoption
and
a
transmittal
outlining
anticipated
points.
The
ila
her
interlocal
agreement
will
cover
these
were
included
in
your
packets,
and
then
the
council
received
a
draft
of
the
ila
a
few
hours
ago.
The
ila
essentially
outlines
the
who
and
how
of
the
services
UTA
will
provide
the
city.
It
identifies
responsibilities
of
each
party.
Recites
mutual
values
acknowledges
the
council's
specific
requests,
respecting
routes
and
service
and
provides
a
framework
for
calculating
the
costs.
C
The
what
of
services,
the
routes,
specific
costs
maps
are
deferred
to
addenda
to
be
negotiated,
considered
and
adopted
annually.
The
first
of
these
addenda
has
not
yet
been
transmitted.
I
think
this
brings
us
to
the
present
moment
and
if
I'm
ale
defer
to
Ben
real
quick
to
speak
briefly
on
the
funding
for
this
initiative.
I.
H
Thought
it
might
be
helpful
context
for
the
council
to
remember
the
funding
from
the
increased
sales
tax
that
was
that
was
set
aside
in
the
annual
budget.
The
table
on
the
screen
summarizes
each
of
the
line
items
the
council
approved
from
the
increased
sales
tax
as
part
of
the
annual
budget
and
you'll
notice
at
the
bottom.
Here
this
2.8
million
this.
H
These
two
line
are
the
amounts
that
will
be
governed
by
the
interlocal
agreement
and
the
addendum-
and
these
are
really
the
mobilization
costs
to
get
things
rolling,
not
to
actually
implement
and
have
the
buses
out
on
the
streets.
Yet
the
funding
for
the
implementation
will
be
included
in
the
next
annual
budget
and
it's
estimated
to
be
approximately
5.3
million
dollars
for
the
phase,
1
implementation
and,
of
course,
that's
dependent
upon
one.
H
The
sales
tax
revenue
coming
in
as
we
budgeted
and
as
we
expected
it
and
to
it
continuing
to
be
a
top
priority
and
included
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
and
the
council
agreeing-
and
there
are
two
additional
line
items
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
point
out.
The
first
is
the
performance
measures,
service,
adjustments,
corridor
studies
and
technical
analyses.
H
This
is
not
governed
by
the
interlocal,
but
it
is
certainly
related
to
it,
and
some
of
the
information
that
may
come
out
of
it
related
to
performance
measures
would
be
helpful
to
include
on
the
funding
our
future
website
to
communicate
to
the
public.
What's
happening
with
this
funding,
how
are
we
tracking
that
it's
improving
services
and
the
other
one
is
the
frequent
transit
network
capital
improvements?
This
is
also
related
because
it
would
be
improvements
to
bus
stops,
adding
shelters,
adding
concrete
pads,
making
them
ad
a
accessible.
G
So
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
skip
the
background
and
I
should
say
I
guess
just
to
start.
I've
had
my
head
deep
in
this
for
six
months,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
stop
me
at
any
time
with
questions,
if
what
I'm
saying
doesn't
make
sense,
please
do
because
to
me
it
will
seem
obvious
because
I've
been
buried
in
it.
It
may
not
say
the
rest
of
the
normal
world
so.
K
Member
Fowler
thanks
I,
think
just
because
we
are
short
on
time
and
we
have
been
working.
You've
been
giving
us
pretty
regular
updates
on
where
the
I
ella
ila
is
going.
I.
Think
the
my
questions
are
just
in
relation
to
the
newest
changes,
which
was
the
master
plan
and
the
addenda
sure.
So
my
understanding
is
that
the
Master,
Agreement
and
and
I
see
it
in
one
of
your
slides
right,
but
we'll
kind
of
govern
the
whole
a
relationship
as
a
whole.
K
G
So
the
basic
framework
we
approached
it
with
a
master
agreement
that
would
has
essentially
established
the
rules
of
the
game
for
the
next
20
years,
so
that
we're
playing
it
the
same
way
every
year,
we're
not
negotiating
from
scratch
on
an
annual
basis,
and
then
we
have
something
consistent
and
transparent
for
the
public.
That
dictates
how
we
negotiate
costs
and
what
each
year
looks
like.
G
The
addenda
gets
into
the
specifics
of
any
given
year
and
it's
directly,
it
runs
in
tandem
or
how
we
envision
it
is
to
run
in
tandem
with
the
budgeting
process
so
that
when
the
allocation
is
made,
the
addendum
is
a
direct
relationship
to
that
allocation,
and
it
specifically
gets
into
here
is
what
we're
getting
this
year
so
again
master
how
we
do
things
and
then
addendum
specific
year.
What
we're
doing?
Okay,.
K
Thank
you
for
that
and
I
have
to
say
I'm
in
support
of
that
model.
Okay,
because
it
makes
sense
to
do
it
that
way.
So
I
appreciate
that
change,
and
then
my
other
question
was
just
on
timing.
I
think
Ben
mentioned
that
or
Kyra
one
of
you
said
something
that
we
need.
The
interlocal
done
by
January
29th.
Is
that
accurate.
G
Ideally,
yes,
ideally,
we
actually
have
it
completed
this
year
if
we
can-
and
we
don't
want
to
do
that
at
the
expense
of
getting
it
right,
and
so
we
have
a
couple
different
approaches
that
could
push
it
to
January.
If
we
need
to
do
that,
I
should
also
say
that
it's
contingent
upon
approval
by
the
UTA
board,
it's
a
new
board,
and
so
you
know
we
eagerly
await
their
thoughts
on
this
agreement
and
how
we've
approached
it,
and
you
know
from
there
I
think
that
will
tell
us
something
as
well
so.
A
K
G
G
G
A
K
K
G
Blank
addendum
is
intended
to
be
a
part
of
the
Master
Agreement,
and
it
just
says
this
year
each
year.
This
is
what
the
addendum
format
will
be
and
the
actual
addendum
will
have.
The
information
that
I
mentioned
is
in
slide.
17
and
I
can
verbally
address
the
capital
costs
which
are
are
not
shown
here,
they're,
very
small,
but
they
are
relevant
and
implementing
the
service.
G
It's
like
a
porta
potty,
so
operators
have
a
place
to
go
to
the
restroom
when
they're
on
breaks,
I
mean
that's
essentially
it
so,
but
in
terms
of
the
content,
the
numbers
inside
17
and
if
you
want
I,
can
advance
I'm
not
going
to
see
the
numbers
the
same
in
the
PDF
as
it's
the
mobilization
activities.
So
it
will.
If
you
look
at
the
bottom
line
on
each
of
these,
this
just
shows
a
month
by
month
what
that
looks
like
over
the
course
of
the
next
year.
So
the
fundings
already
been
approved.
G
Uts
budget
year
starts
in
January
and
they
would
just
start
drawing
down,
and
you
can
see
it
goes
up
over
time
and
then
stabilizes
once
they're
fully
staffed
up
there.
People
are
trained
and
so
on
and
ready
to
start
driving
buses
in
August.
So
that's
that's
really.
What
the
first
addendum
will
be.
The
actual
service
miles
would
happen
as
part
of
our
next
budgeting
process,
and
we
actually
have
most
of
that
put
together
already,
so
we
can
start
that
conversation
whenever
you're,
ready
and.
D
I'll
just
make
a
point
here,
just
how
close
we
are
on
this
I
mean
so
soon
we
started
in
July,
and
it's
now
you
know
late
November,
and
they
were
this
close
on
it.
I
just
want
to
give
a
lot
of
credit
to
a
lot
of
people
who's
sitting
behind
me,
but
we're
down
to
one
last
cell
on
the
cost
calculator
spreadsheet
that
we're
very
close
to
having
finalized
private
the
next
day
or
two,
and
then
we
can
move
ahead,
putting
together
the
addendum
for
this
fiscal
year.
So.
F
A
Know
you
know
what
I'm
saying
people
that
personally
I
have
to
have
that
in
order
to
finalize
this
on
December
11th
I'm,
not
gonna,
buy
the
house
unless
I
get
to
walk
through
it.
Okay.
Personally,
that's
how
I
will
vote
so
in
hearing
that
you
I
mean
we're
set
up
to
take
action
on
December
11th
we've
got
a
public
hearing
again
tonight.
G
Looking
at
Megan
I
feel
like
doable.
So
when
you
mention
the
January
29th
deadline,
I,
my
question
was
more
about.
Are
you
okay?
If
we
do
it
sooner,
because
I
think
we
can,
and
ideally
yes,
you're
adopting
this
agreement
so
that
you
ta
can
start
the
process
they
need
to
do
to
get
the
service
on
the
ground
in
August,
which
would
start
in
January.
We-
and
you
know
we
can
like
I-
mentioned
push
it
a
little
bit,
but
we
don't
really
think
that's
the
best
idea.
Cindy.
F
F
A
Well,
we
appreciate
the
pace
at
which
you're
working
and
we,
the
public
awareness
of
our
decision
and
our
ability
to
have
time
to
review
it
more
than
24
hours,
is
pretty
important.
So
we
appreciate
both
of
those
things
and
we
look
forward
to
you
filling
in
the
last
cell
and
getting
that
addenda
completed
and
we'll
bring
it
back
as
soon
as
we
can.
Okay
and.