►
Description
Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting - December 05, 2019
A
A
A
A
D
B
F
A
G
A
Actually,
let
me
back
up
I
do
have
one
item
that
is
peripherally
historical
Salt,
Lake
City
is
going
through
a
study
on
rebuilding
or
some
work
done
on
first
south
street
between
about
9th
east
and
the
university,
and
the
proposed
work
does
not
include
any
bicycle:
bicycle
travel
improvements
as
per
the
Complete
Streets,
ordinance
that
the
city
has
adopted.
So
the
city
Transportation
Department,
is
in
contradiction
with
its
own
ordinances.
If
the
Commission
or
the
public
are
interested
in
this,
they
should
talk
to
city
transportation
or
bike
Utah.
A
A
H
You
okay,
so
this
is
a
request
for
a
major
alteration
to
the
principal
structure
located
at
679.
Second
Avenue:
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
an
addition
to
the
west
of
the
existing
structure.
The
addition
is
approximately
1,000
336
square
feet
in
size
and
22
feet:
six
inches
in
height.
The
property
is
a
contributing
structure
to
the
avenues,
local
historic
district
and
is
located
within
the
sr1.
A
zoning
district.
H
The
properties
are
located
on
the
north
side
of
2nd
Avenue
between
J
and
K
Street.
The
surrounding
context
includes
a
multi-family
residential
structure
to
the
east
and
a
single-family
residential
structure
to
the
west.
The
property
to
the
south
is
a
religious
institution.
The
configuration
of
the
property
consists
of
two
Lots.
This
configuration
provides
area
for
the
addition
to
be
sited
to
the
west
of
the
principal
structure.
H
Staff
briefly
discussed
the
property
history
within
the
staff
report.
The
two
properties
are
currently
not
consolidated
and
have
the
following
addresses:
675
and
679
East,
2nd
Avenue.
The
principal
building
located
at
679,
contains
eight
multifamily
units.
This
structure
was
converted
into
an
8
Plex
in
1935
by
utilizing
the
square
footage
of
both
675
and
679.
H
This
was
determined
in
a
requested
administrative
interpretation
and
2018.
Due
to
the
interpretation,
the
property
owner
has
submitted
an
expansion
of
a
non-conforming
use
for
the
addition
to
the
West,
an
enlargement
of
a
non-conforming
use
as
a
special
exception
and
is
subject
to
the
specific
size
limitations
outlined
in
the
staff
report.
H
H
H
The
proposed
addition
will
be
attached
to
an
existing
extension
located
on
the
northern
portion
of
the
western
elevation.
The
addition
is
placed
approximately
37
feet,
8
inches
to
the
north
of
the
front
elevation
as
seen
on
the
site
plan
and
approximately
63
feet,
8
inches
from
the
southern
property
line.
The
site
includes
a
new
driveway
that
will
extend
to
the
rear
of
the
property
and
the
South
elevation
of
the
addition
includes
the
primary
entrance
to
the
Yuna
place
on
the
western
side
to
hipped.
Roof
forms
are
present
on
the
addition.
H
The
materials
include
masonry
composite
shaped
siding
and
the
massing
of
the
addition
is
rectangular,
with
the
majority
of
the
massing
oriented
from
north
to
south.
The
North
elevation
extends
beyond
the
northern
elevation
of
the
existing
structure.
The
materials
transition
from
masonry
to
cement,
lap,
siding
on
the
first
level
and
composite
shapes
on
the
second.
H
The
western
elevation
illustrates
how
the
addition
steps
with
the
increased
grade
to
the
north,
the
eastern
elevation,
extends
beyond
the
northern
boundary
of
the
existing
structure.
However,
this
elevation
of
the
addition
steps
in
to
meet
the
required
side
yard
and
continues
the
lowered
roof
height.
H
A
section
the
key
issues
that
were
identified
within
the
staff
report
include
the
visibility
of
the
addition
and
the
required
lot.
Consolidation
as
to
discuss
the
addition
is
setback
from
the
property
line
just
over
63
feet
and
back
from
the
front
line
of
the
existing
structure
just
over
37
feet.
The
location
of
the
addition
helps
you
to
diminish
the
prominence
massing
and
scale
in
regard
to
the
lot.
Consolidation
staff
is
recommending
that
the
historic
landmark
Commission
required
a
lot.
A
I
You
can
see
here
this
a
rendering
that
my
daughter
did
the
existing
house
and
then
to
the
west
to
the
left
is
the
proposed
addition,
it's
kind
of
shielding
shadow,
because
it's
approximately
38
feet
behind
the
front
of
the
house.
So
it's
quite
a
ways
back
from
the
street
as
Kelsey
said
originally,
you
know
we
bought
the
property
14
years
ago.
I
They
were
two
separate
Lots
I
thought
I
could
build
a
house
on
it,
but
the
planning
department
determined
that,
though
they
were
separate,
Lots,
the
one
was
associated
with
the
other
and
that's
why
I've
got
a
much
smaller
addition,
rather
than
a
than
a
new
new
house.
So
this
is
a
view
of
what
it
looked
like
from
the
street.
With
the
Christian
house,
existing
driveway
it'd
be
a
two-story
addition.
I
I
I
I
Get
it
okay,
a
front
elevation
again,
it's
kind
of
deceptive,
because
in
a
straight
elevation
it
shows
that
they
are.
It
almost
appears
like
they're
in
aligned,
but
the
addition
is
38
feet
behind
the
existing
building.
The
intent
is
to
match
the
brick
of
the
existing
building
with
the
addition,
the
same
brick
and
then
the
second
floor
to
use
shingle,
siding
and
deciding
on
the
dormers
of
the
existing
building.
I
The
asbestos
shingles
in
the
back
are
broken
and
a
few
years
ago,
I
think
was
about
five
years
ago
we
had
a
rear,
ooft
and
I
think
the
roofers
broke,
many
of
the
shingles,
so
I
need
to
replace
that's
the
asbestos
siding
on
the
upper
dormers
Kelsey
was
able
to
find
some
old
historic
photographs.
When
the
dormers
were
first
built,
they
were
shingles,
so
side
replaced
with
shingles
and
then
those
same
shingles
would
match
and
the
additions
would
match
the
shingles
on
the
dormers
of
the
existing
building.
I
And
as
Kelsey
pointed
out,
here's
the
west
elevation
brick
around
the
front
first
first
floor,
then
siding
on
the
first
floor,
back
portion
shingles.
On
the
second
floor,
all
the
way
around
and
again
of
you
that
you'll
never
really
see
because
from
my
building,
then
you've
got
the
apartment,
building
next
door
with
their
garages.
So
it's
that's
what
it
looked
like
if
you
could
really
get
on
the
roof
of
my
neighbor's
garage.
D
D
C
I
And
in
this
case,
like
I,
said,
I
have
brick
on
the
front
where
it
turns
a
corner.
The
back
is
wood,
siding.
The
back
of
the
existing
house
is
also
exciting,
and
the
date
back
in
the
neighbor's
house
is
wood,
siding
in
the
back.
It
seems
like
you
go
in
the
back
alley
and
everything
is
it's
into
brick
on
the
front
and
in
the
back
of
siding
and
that's
I'm,
proposing
the
same
thing.
It's.
A
A
Okay,
seeing
no
one
I
will
close
the
public
session
and
we'll
take
this
into
executive
session.
Where
we
can
discuss
this,
you
know
I,
think
one
thing
I
had
to
bring
up
that
Russ
SEOs
question
prompted
me
is:
is
this
design
too
much
trying
to
imitate
the
historical
style?
I
looked
to
commissioners
for
some
thoughts
on
that?
Please
you.
E
E
You
know
in
terms
of
us
is
scale
and
its
mass
and
the
way
it's
set
back.
You
know
it
it.
If
anything-
and
you
know
it
fits
it
nicely,
but
it
it
would
actually
be
nice
if
the
in
my
opinion,
if
this
formed
part
of
the
street
facade
where
it
was,
you
know
another
house
on
the
street
another
tooth
in
the
mouth.
In
this
case
it
feels
like
a
tooth.
That's
been
bashed
out
and
it's
kind
of
sticking
the
backwards.
I.
G
D
I
Well,
I
did
have
it
close
to
the
front,
but
I
was
in
looking
at
the
design
guidelines
that
they
state
that
the
addition
needs
to
be
subordinate
to
the
primary
residence.
So
I
pushed
it
back,
so
it
so.
It
wasn't,
and
initially
I
had
the
parking
in
the
front
pushed
back
and
in
the
park
in
the
front.
But
then
the
guideline
said
well:
the
parking
needs
to
be
in
the
rear.
I
So
so
then
I
pushed
a
little
bit
further
forward,
so
it's
just
kind
of,
but
that
was
the
main
reason
just
so
that
it
wouldn't
compete
with
the
primary
structure
and
it'd
be
subordinate
to
it,
and
it's
a
very
deep
lock.
It's
a
hundred
and
sixty
five
feet
deep
and
my
footprints
only
a
thousand
square
feet.
So
it's
a
kind
of
right
in
the
middle
of
the
one
hundred
sixty
five
foot,
deep,
lock,
mm-hmm,
but
that's
really
what
I
was
to
not
compete
with
the
architecture
of
the
existing
structure.
F
E
F
J
C
A
E
C
E
Okay,
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Commission
approved
petition
PL
at
a
Chelsea
2019
831,
which
is
request
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
major
alteration,
the
contributing
structure,
675
and
679
East
2nd
Avenue
with
the
following
direction.
Number
one
approval
of
all
final
design
details,
including
specific
direction
expressed
by
the
Commission,
shall
be
delegated
to
staff
number
two
that
the
applicant
submit
and
finalize
a
lot
consolidation
plan
with
Salt
Lake
County,
actually.
C
A
A
K
Most
of
the
requested
modifications
were
denied
at
that
meeting,
except
for
what's
highlighted
here,
which
is
a
change
in
the
garage
door,
material
on
the
East
elevation,
changes
to
the
front
and
back
doorway
detail
on
the
ground
floor
of
each
of
the
units
and
then
changes
to
the
window,
dimensions
and
materials
on
the
rear
facade.
So
those
are
the
things
that
were
approved
and
everything
else
is
to
be
constructed
per
the
originally
approved
plans.
K
K
K
And
then
just
to
reacquaint
you
with
the
front
facade
here
of
the
project
kind
of
a
streetscape
here,
and
then
this
is
the
West
elevation
that
will
be
affected
and
it's
just
those
three
things
tonight
that
are
being
requested
and
then
everything
else.
For
example,
those
middle
windows
that
are
kind
of
the
four
vertical
windows
will
be
put
back
to
what
was
originally
approved.
And
then
here's
kind
of
a
two
views
standing
right
on
that
west
side
and
you
can
see
the
little
back
patios
are
pushed
in.
K
K
K
K
E
K
C
A
K
Right
so
so
there,
so
they
were
going
to
go
back
because
this
was
constructed
over
the
summer
and
they
weren't
aware
of
the
requirements
that
of
the
CoA.
It
was
all
constructed
and
built
out
to
this
point,
and
then
it
was
put
on
hold
and
so
now
they're
coming
back
in
August.
We
said
no
bring
this
back
to
the
original
approval,
but
they
feel
it's
worthwhile
to
come
back
for
these
three
things
that
are
constructed
and
they
have
reasoning
for
it.
I
can
let
them
go
into
detail.
That'll.
K
A
K
E
E
L
C
L
Hi,
my
name's,
my
name,
is
Karl
York
I
live
in
Cottonwood,
Heights
and
Tate.
Seamer
is
my
partner
on
this,
but
I'm
this
window
replacement
project
is
in
my
in
my
wheelhouse,
so
I
can
just
point
out
a
couple
things
to
start,
which
would
be
that
as
you
as
you
look
here.
Okay,
there
we
go
so
these
windows
were
put
in
there.
They
weren't
on
the
original
design,
and
we
put
them
in
in
the
kitchens
to
add
extra
light.
So
they
are
vinyl.
We
will.
L
We
will
be
replacing
them
with
the
aluminum,
clad
wood
so
that
they
fit
the
requirements
of
the
historic
landmark
Commission.
So
yes,
they
were
they
were.
They
went
against
the
original
design,
but
they
they
performed
the
function
of
adding
a
lot
of
light
to
the
kitchen.
So
we
wanted
to
keep
them
and
and
and
we'll
still
be
changing
them
out,
but
they
will
repeat
the
requirements
and
I
think
that
that
seemed
like.
That
was
one
of
the
questions
here
and
these
windows
down
here
that
we're
taking
out
they
happen
to
be
in
the
furnace.
L
L
The
six-foot
cedar
fence
running
the
whole
distance
of
that
side
of
the
house
on
top
of
a
three-foot
retaining
wall
so
visit
visibly
the
only
way
to
see
them
would
be
standing
right
in
front
of
them,
so
we
felt
that
it
was
better
to
have
those
kept
out
for
those
reasons
and
the
windows
up
in
the
bathrooms.
So
those
these
are.
These
are
up
in
the
showers
and
we
made
them
a
little
bit
bigger
than
the
original
and
we'd
like
to
just
keep
that
size
and
replace
them
with
fiberglass,
which
gets
the
requirements
as
well.
L
L
L
They
were
not
familiar
with
familiar
enough
with
the
Historic
Landmark
District
and
in
the
effort
to
save
money
rearranged
all
the
windows
made
them
vinyl
to
save
money.
Well,
that
was
the
opposite
of
what
happened.
Obviously,
so
we're
going
back
and
changing
changing
it
around,
but
we
feel
that
these
modifications
that
were
made
have
merit.
So
that's
why
we're
coming
back
and
asking
for
those.
L
Those
were
approved
in
the
previous
meeting.
There
were
three
changes
approved
in
the
previous
meeting,
so
these
windows
and
doors
that
you
see
will
be
swapped
out,
but
the
changes
won't
so
that
the
sizes
won't
change.
So,
unlike
some
of
the
other
ones
that
were
made
bigger,
we
were
we
were
granted
the
ability
to
keep
these
sizes
for
these
doors
and
windows,
but
they
will
be
in
the
proper
material
instead
of
vinyl
they'll
be
aluminum,
clad,
wood.
H
E
C
A
Okay,
sorry
to
be
dancing
I'm,
still,
not
understanding
the
chronology.
I,
don't
necessarily
oppose
the
windows
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
chronology
here.
So
on
your
on
your
page
number
three,
you
show
a
proposed
West
elevation
above
the
originally
approved
West
elevation.
When
that
says
originally
approved.
Was
this
what
we
did
last
summer
or
was
that
the
video.
K
Was
the
original
original
from
2017,
which
was
what
you
decided
that
the
facade
needed
to
revert
back
to
in
August?
So
this
is
what
we're
kind
of
working
off
of
now,
because
that's
what
you
all
made
the
decision
that
they
should
build
and
so
I
didn't
include
the
elevation
that
was
or
the
as-built
drawings
that
were
brought
to
you
in
August
because
we're
the
they're
in
the
previous
staff
report.
If
you,
if
you
and
it's
linked,
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
that.
But
now
this
is
the
updated
elevation.
A
K
A
K
A
E
E
J
G
Think
to
be
fair,
this
is
a
combination
of
three
different
things
that
or
at
least
two
different
things
that
you're
seeing
you're
seeing
the
original
design
with
the
tripartite
window.
On
the
second
floor,
you
are
seeing
the
original
window
on
the
third
floor
to
the
north
side
of
each
unit,
which
is
kind
of
a
three-piece
window,
Thank
You
Lauren.
G
Those
were
not
what
you
saw
in
August,
because
that's
not
what
was
built,
that's
what
was
originally
opposed
whatever
two
years
ago
and
then
you're
also
seeing
the
modified
version
of
the
front
porch,
which
did
get
approved
in
August
and
then
so.
What
really?
What
they're
asking
for
is
the
absence
of
Windows,
where
the
utility
room
is
on
the
ground
floor,
the
kitchen
windows
on
the
second
floor
and
an
enlarged
window
that
yes
does
exist
today.
Those
three
windows
in
the
solid
red
boxes
exist
today,
so
it
is
a
Frankenstein
version.
It's
not
exactly.
G
I
think
the
other
thing
to
keep
in
mind
with
the
windows
and
Lauren
outlined
this
in
her
staff
report,
particularly
in
the
key
consideration
section
when
we're
looking
at
Windows
we're
not
necessarily
looking
at
Windows
individually,
we're
looking
at
them
as
a
composition
across
the
facade
of
the
building.
So
this
is
a
different
composition
than
what
you
saw
in
August
and
it's
a
different
composition,
though,
what
the
Commission
saw
previously
or
originally-
and
the
rhythm
is
slightly
different-
I
mean
those
are
the
things
that
you're
considering.
J
G
That
and
you're
not
seeing
what
you're
not
seeing
is
what
was
originally
built
are
not
originally
built,
but
what
was
actually
constructed?
What
is
constructed
today,
there's
like
three
three
by
four
windows
that
actually
don't
even
match
each
other
on
the
third
floor.
Instead
of
that
three-part
window,
can
you,
when
we
actually
drove
around
the
corner
today
during
the
field
trip
from
sixth
east
and
looked
through
the
apartment
complex
that
you
see
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen,
you
could
see
the
three
windows
on
the
third
floor.
G
Yes,
there's
a
large
rectangle,
a
square
and
a
small
rectangle
that
are
all
put
together
in
a
composition
that
was
the
original
approval.
What
is
built
today
are
three
three
by
four
rect
or
approximately
smaller
rectangles
that
are
kind
of
squashed
together
and
as
we
notice
today,
the
middle
window,
at
least
on
one
of
the
units,
is
a
different,
actual
window
manufacturer
or
something
and
has
a
completely
different
look
than
the
other
two
windows
on
either
side
of
it.
So
they
are
there.
G
They
recognize
and
are
following
what
the
Commission's
direction
was
in
August
was
to
go
back
to
this
three
piece
window
with
the
large
rectangle
the
square
and
the
smaller
rectangle,
so
that
is
different
than
what
the
drawing
that
you
saw
in
August
with
of
the
as
Bilt's.
So
the
composition
that
is
before
you
tonight
is
well
on.
G
The
screen
is
what
you
see
at
the
top,
so
the
little
patio
is
what
was
approved
in
August
those
the
two
windows
with
the
door,
no
windows
where
the
utility
rooms
are,
those
windows
were
never
installed
and
then
the
second
floor.
There's
two
windows
in
the
kitchen:
those
are
installed
and
then
the
third
floor.
They
haven't
changed
it
out
yet
because
they
need
your
approval.
Their
final
approval
on
this
well
they're
going
to
revert
back
to
the
original
design
with
the
three
pieces,
and
then
the
shower
window
will
be
the
original
proposal.
J
G
K
K
Absolutely
correct,
but
I
think
Molly
made
a
good
point
was,
in
our
analysis,
you've
rejected
that
composition,
and
this
is
a
slightly
different
composition,
with
components
of
the
originally
approved
and
what
was
built.
So
it
wasn't
like
because
you
rejected
the
single
window.
They
can't
come
back
with
a
kind
of
altered,
facade.
E
With
regard
to
the
west
side,
the
West
facade
of
this
building,
specifically,
we
are
approving
modifications
to
the
fenestration
to
the
doors
and
we
are
approving
aluminum,
clad
wood
windows
in
all
of
these
openings,
except
for
three
openings
in
shower
rooms.
This
is
to
the
new
construction
project
at
613,
East,
100,
South,
sorry,.
G
E
C
J
F
A
M
Thank
You
mr.
chair
members
of
the
Commission.
This
is
a
work
session
for
a
new,
a
part
apartment
complex
at
33rd,
South,
600
East.
This
is
a
rendering
of
what
is
being
proposed.
This
is
the
subject
site.
If
you
will
recall,
we
did
bring
a
rezone
request
to
you
back
earlier
in
the
spring
that
went
to
Planning
Commission.
It
went
on
to
the
City
Council
and
the
City
Council
approved
rezoning
this
portion
of
the
property
to
our
Oh
residential
office,
and
after
that
time
the
applicant
has
designed
a
project
that
meets
the
ro
standards.
M
Planning
staff
and
the
applicant
worked
diligently
to
refine
the
initial
design,
so
the
proposal
better
meets
the
standards
and
guidelines
I'd
like
to
thank
the
applicant
Annapolis
applicants,
design
team
for
all
the
hard
work
on
the
revisions.
Both
the
plans
and
the
narrative
I
think
that
that
exercise
has
resulted
in
a
much
better
project.
I
think
that
time
spent
was
very
productive.
M
More
often
than
not
in
preparation
for
a
work
session
with
the
with
with
you,
the
landmark
Commission
we
as
planning
staff,
will
identify
and
discuss
issues
for
any
given
project,
specific
issues
for
the
landmark
Commission
to
and
the
app
for
the
landmark
mission
the
African
to
discuss
these
issues
are
usually
then
addressed
with
the
applicant
prior
to
returning
to
the
landmark
Commission
for
public
hearing
in
a
decision.
I
have
not
identified
any
issues
of
concern
with
the
Masonic
Temple
project.
M
This
is
due
to
the
fact
that
staff
and
the
applicant
hammered
out
these
issues
through
the
various
iterations
of
design
prior
to
this
meeting.
That
is
not
to
say
that
you
may
not
have
issues,
but
as
of
this
particular
time,
we
as
planning
staff,
have
not
concerned.
I
have
not
identified
any
issues
with
the
proposal
and
finally,
I
just
wanted
to
say.
M
Part
of
the
purpose
of
tonight's
work
session
is
to
focus
on
the
seven
standards
for
new
construction
and
the
associated
multifamily
design
guidelines
I,
provided
you
with
a
matrix
in
that
document,
outlining
the
standards
and
guidelines
and
I've
hope.
You've
had
an
opportunity
to
look
at
that.
It's
a
lot
of
information.
It's
a
it's
a
lot
of
information
to
digest
and.
M
Oops,
so
for
tonight's
work
session,
we
request
that
the
landmark
Commission
discuss
the
applicant
application
materials
and
provide
initial
input,
feedback
and
direction
to
the
applicant
so
that
they
can
finalize
their
proposal
and
bring
it
back
to
you
for
a
decision.
We
would
ask
that
you
would
focus
at
a
minimum
on
the
massing
scale,
historical
appropriateness,
building
materials,
building,
articulation
and
compatibility
with
the
Jason
structures
as
part
of
this
work
session
discussion,
and
unless
you
have
any
questions
for
me
at
this
time,
I
would
turn
the
time
over
to
the
applicant.
A
N
N
Yes,
okay
with
me
tonight
is
Meghnad
Aubry
and
David
Abraham's
with
Nexus
architects.
They
are
the
project
architect
and
lead
architect
for
this
project.
We're
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
Masonic
Temple
Association,
as
Lex
mentioned,
we
were
before
you
back
in
May
prior
to
a
rezone
request.
I
want
to
publicly
thank
Lex,
moly
Nick
Mikaela
many
in
the
planning
department
that
have
opined
and
provided
really
good
feedback.
I
would
concur
with
Lex
that
through
those
three
orations
that
we
work
through,
the
project
has
only
gotten
better.
N
It
actually
makes
us
even
more
excited,
so
we're
going
to
take
you
on
a
little
bit
of
a
journey.
I
know
I'm
trying
not
to
waste
your
time,
but
the
intent
is
for
you
to
understand
some
of
the
thought
process
that
we've
had
and
then
equally,
if
not
more
important,
have
you
give
us
some
direction
on?
Maybe
what
we've
missed,
what
we
can
do
better
and
what
we've
done
right
or
we've
done
well.
So
that's
really.
The
intent
of
tonight
I
always
learned
something
new.
N
When
I
come
to
these
tonight,
I
already
learned
that
Commissioner
Richardson's
middle
name
is
Scott,
so
I'm
already
up
I'm
already
up
one
I
I
do
I
do
want
this
body
has
changed
a
little
bit
since
the
last
time
we
were
here
and
so
publicly.
I
want
to
thank
Commissioner,
Sheppard,
Brennan
and
her
for
their
service.
We
worked
on
several
projects
with
them
and
I
appreciate
their
service.
N
We
also
will
also
lost
a
wonderful
planning
staff
member
in
in
Carl,
who
is
kind
of
a
preservationist
and
an
historian
at
heart,
which
were
sad
to
see
him
go
and
we've
certainly
appreciated
learning
from
him.
So
the
Masonic
Temple,
we
told
you
a
little
bit
of
this
before
the
Masonic
Temple
Association
will
have
ownership
in
this
project,
we'll
be
involved
in
this
project.
This
is
seen
as
the
creation
of
an
economic
source
of
revenue
to
create,
or
so
help
sustain
the
long-term
economic
viability
of
the
temple
itself.
They
love
the
temple.
N
They
don't
want
to
see
the
temple
bastardized
and
turned
into
an
office
building
or
a
mix
of
uses,
and
so
they're
trying
to
figure
out
other
uses.
The
development
of
this
parking
lot
serves
them
and
I
also
believe
it
serves
the
city
in
that
one
of
the
key
factors
of
this.
This
area's
master
plan
is
to
develop
underutilized,
particularly
surface
parking
lots,
so
we're
really
really
excited
about
this
site.
N
With
the
with
the
RO
zone,
we
took
what
this
site
is.
We
plugged
in
the
current
setbacks,
the
current
parameters,
current
height
allowances,
and
we
created
this
massing
block.
This
is
just
super
super
exciting
for
all
of
us,
I
can
tell
then
what
we
did
is
we
took
comments
from
Lex.
We
took
some
of
the
comments
that
we
have
heard
from
this
commission
on
other
projects
of
our
own
or
other
projects,
just
in
watching
the
Commission,
and
we
started
really
looking
at
this
block
of
cheese.
N
If
you
will
and
figure
out
how
to
dice
it
slice
it
and
dice
it.
So
one
of
the
first
things
we
obviously
did
is
looked
at.
We
were
slightly
over
the
FA,
our
ratio,
the
floor
area
coverage,
so
cutting
out
some
of
the
rear
of
the
building
was
was
something
immediate.
We
then
knowing
or
having
been
before
the
body
before
we
understand
the
importance
of
that
pedestrian
scale
and
that
streetscape
and
so
over
20
feet
about
37
feet
in
depth.
N
We
decided
to
pull
whatever
is
along
the
street
facade
out
of
this
block,
so
we
ended
up
with
a
square
with
this.
Then
we
looked
at
some
of
the
properties
to
the
south
of
this
site,
which
were
generally
older,
historic
single-family
homes
there
now
beds
and
breakfasts
or
office
uses,
but
they
were
constructed
as
single-family
homes,
and
so
it
felt
appropriate
to
create
an
additional
buffer
adjacent
to
those.
So
we
looked
at
about
a
25
foot
depth
again
by
the
height
of
that
space.
Across
there,
then
we
looked
at
essentially
the
doughnut
of
this
space.
N
But
notice
is
the
beautiful
mountains
behind
us
and
the
steps
and
the
staggering
and
and
the
the
tears
that
are
created
in
the
in
the
mountain
range
standing
right
there,
and
so
the
the
thought
was
what,
if
we
did
something
similar
with
the
building
so
out
on
600
East
again
to
create
more
variation.
This
corner
on
the
upper
two
floors
has
been
removed
and
then
back
on
the
on
the
southeast
corner.
N
Another
area
upon
that
upper
floor
was
was
pulled
back
to
create
additional
setback,
additional
separation
and
just
some
more
articulation
in
the
actual
building
height,
and
you
ended
up
with
these
kind
of
voids
and
setbacks,
and
then
the
other
one
that
we've
since
worked
on
here
in
talking
to
some
preservationist
in
talking
to
some
individuals
that
are
very
mindful
of
what
is
going
on
and
transpiring.
In
this
area,
you
can
see
it
a
little
bit
better
here,
but
we
ended
up
the
side.
Yard
setback.
N
I
want
to
say
is
20
feet
might
be
15
whatever
it
is.
We
increased
it
by
five
feet
and
in
intend
on
creating
this
pedestrian,
mu
and
connection
to
where
we
intend
to
relocate
the
carriage
house.
There's
a
carriage
house
currently
here
on
the
property.
It's
a
non
contributing
story.
Sure
it
is
old,
we'd
love
to
relocate
as
much
of
that
building
as
we
can,
even
if
it's
some
of
the
joists
and
roof
members
and
cool
barn
door,
but
something
as
a
nod.
This
was
used
by
the
Masons
for
some
of
the
storage
of
materials.
N
When
the
temple
itself
was
constructed,
it's
kind
of
mid-block
and
I
think
that's
part
of
the
reason.
It
never
got
a
contributory
status,
but
we
want
to
create
a
focal
point,
mid
block,
so
creating
a
mu,
adding
an
extra
five
feet
of
setback
or
extra
space
along
this
side.
Creating
this
Mew
for
the
public
to
come
back
to
a
point
that
can
be
a
gathering
place,
something
to
pay
respect
to
what
was
there
and
what
was
built,
and
our
hope
is
that
mu.
N
While
we
don't
control
what
can
can
happen
here
to
the
east,
our
hope
is
that
creating
that
pedestrian
walkway
might
lead
to
some
connectivity
to
the
east
in
the
future.
What
we
can
do
is
make
certain
we
connect
back
up
here
to
the
north
back
to
South
temple
along
the
west
side
of
the
masonic
temple
itself.
N
So
then,
into
into
some
sections
and
you'll
see
the
three
different
section
lines
here.
So
we've
got
one
section
line
here
at
kind
of
the
brownstone
townhome
elevation,
one
back
where
the
building
actually
then
steps
back
up
and
then
one
toward
the
rear
back
here,
adjacent
to
the
height
of
the
Masonic
Temple
itself
kind
of
in
the
mid
block.
So
this
first
elevation
is
that
that
third
section
the
furthest
east
most
section.
N
N
N
And
then
an
aerial
as
Lex
mentioned
this
is
this
is
complex,
so
we
tried
to
take
some
aerial
shots
of
two
that
help
show
the
depth.
So
this
is
that
27
or
37
excuse
me
feet
of
depth
so
between
the
25-foot
front
yard
setback
and
this
37
foot
depth
for
these
brownstones
we're
in
excess
of
60
feet
of
depth
from
the
sidewalk
to
where
the
the
main
mass
of
the
building
extends
and
then
on
the
South
elevation.
N
With
that
15
foot,
normal
side,
yard
setback
increased
by
5
feet,
and
then
these
25
foot,
this
25
foot
deep
product
anywhere
adjacent
to
these
structures.
We
are
just
shy
of
50
feet
of
depth
and
separation
before
the
stepping
of
the
the
main
portion
of
the
building
another
shot
from
the
Northwest.
Looking
southeast.
N
This
is
the
architectural
rendering
these
are
to
the
best
of
our
representation,
some
of
the
trees.
So
really,
as
we've
focused
on
this
building,
we've
wanted
to
focus
while
we
focused
on
the
whole
building,
we've
really
focused
a
lot
of
effort
and
been
uber
sensitive
to
the
first
two
floors
to
that
pedestrians
scale
that
Street
scale
I'll.
Let
these
guys
talk
in
a
minute
about
some
of
those
more
refined
and
finite
points.
N
We
in
one
of
our
iterations,
this
area
was
actually
going
to
be
the
garage
entrance.
We've
moved
that
to
the
north
facade
for
one
level
of
parking.
The
second
level
of
parking
is
actually
accessed
off
of
that
road,
an
alley
that
is
west
of
the
temple
and
then
go
back
to
the
site
plan
to
show
you
that,
but
there
there
will
be
no
garage
entrances
on
600
East.
We
think
that's
a
great
change
and
then
then
you
get
into
some
of
the.
This
is
the
West
elevation
and
some
of
those
materiality
so
down
low.
N
We
intend
on
utilizing
an
aluminum
storefront
system.
We
would
like
at
that
level
to
utilize
some
glass
railings.
Certainly
up
above
we
would
look
to
go
to
more
of
a
horizontal
metal
railing
and
up
above
that
as
well.
While
it's
listed
here
as
a
vinyl
window,
the
intent
is
more
of
an
Andersen
100
series
composite
window,
not
a
vinyl
window
and
something
darker
in
in
color.
N
This
is
that
South
facade
we've
got
almost
10
feet
of
fall
from
the
east
to
the
west
of
this
site.
So,
as
you
can
see
here,
it
allows
for
about
three-quarters
of
that
building
to
actually
have
units
that
can
walk
out
or
have
patios
out
on
to
that
paseo,
the
last
75
feet,
or
so
that
building
we
just
don't
have
the
the
depth
for
livable
units,
and
so
that's
where
some
of
that
architectural
concrete
would
be
reintroduced.
N
This
is
the
East
elevation,
so
this
is
facing
into
the
rest
of
the
Masonic
parking
lot.
This
is
one
of
the
garage
access
points
this
is
at
grade.
There
is
a
garage
level
below
this
that
essentially
is
at
grade
with
600
east,
and
then
this
is
the
North
elevation
and
you
can
see
the
the
garage
entrance
there.
This
gives
you
a
better
depiction
of
that
lower
garage
level.
N
The
other
thing
that
we've
paid
attention
to
that
that
Lex
made
certain
we
paid
attention
to
is
this
fenestration
and
and
facade
articulation.
So
we
have
many
many
points
that
are
in
excess
of
four
and
five
feet.
All
of
the
points
of
the
patios
that
are
operable
are
in
excess
of
four
or
five
feet
in
depth
and
then
the
areas
that
they're
not
like
this,
for
example.
This
is
about
two
and
a
half
feet
to
this
plane,
and
then
this
window
plane
is
recessed
another
two
and
a
half
feet.
N
N
We
looked
at
many
of
the
buildings
around
us.
There
are
kind
of
these
three
element:
facade
organizations
of
windows,
hierarchy
of
windows,
doors,
entry,
stoop,
Sportacus
shared
some
of
that,
and
so
we've
tried
to
introduce
that
as
we've
broken
up
and
go
back
up
to
this
facade,
we've
also
tried
to
organize
this
building
in
a
similar
manner.
So
you've
got
these
more
pronounced
ends
and
then
a
more
pronounced
middle
focal
point.
N
N
A
C
G
N
Regis
flats
Regis
flats
will
be
the
name
of
the
project.
Originally
it
was
Masonic
Temple
Apartments
just
because
that
was
the
application,
because
it's
associated
with
the
Masonic
Temple
but
Regis
flats
or
Regis
Square.
Thank
you
and
and
the
address
that
we're
working
on
is
3-3,
South,
600
East
and
that's
the
far
north
end
of
the
building.
Where
that
main
kind
of
entrance
point
is,
and
those
have
some,
those
have
some
historical
significance
to
the
the
Masons
themselves.
Both
the
name
and
the
address.
B
N
N
A
O
Have
these
two
ratios
of
windows,
a
1,
a
2
to
1
ratio
where
it's
kind
of
vertically
oriented
and
then
a
one
point,
two
five
to
one
ratio
where
the
building
it
the
way
of
the
window
is
just
a
little
bit
taller
than
it
is
wide,
and
so
we've
used
that
that
same
pattern
on
those
upper
levels
and
that
would
be
more
of
a
stucco
material.
That's
provides
more
of
a
modern,
contemporary
clean
look.
A
O
And
so
that,
as
indicated
in
those
pictures
that
we
had
up
the
traditional
buildings
have
these
kind
of
3
3
elements
and
sometimes
they're
symmetric,
the
ones
we
showed
were
symmetric,
but
the
residential
building
to
the
south.
It's
actually
the
contributing
building
on
this
street
face
has
an
asymmetric,
has
the
entrance
on
the
left
side
and
then
the
kind
of
main
facade
is
is
flat,
so
we're
looking
if
you
pull
up
the
flat
facade.
O
Actually,
so
you
keep
going
a
few
more
go
back
one
when
my
perfect
perfect,
so
here
we're
kind
of
organizing
into
the.
If
you're
looking
from
left
to
right,
you
can
read,
there's
the
first
two
or
the
first
four
windows
create
one
element.
The
next
four
create
an
element.
The
next
four
create
an
element
that
kind
of
creates
the
the
three
and
then
you're.
O
Moving
on
to
the
center
again,
you
have
kind
of
one
two
three
elements
that
are
made
up
of
two
windows:
each
which
matches
the
two
windows
that
we
have
on
the
residential
buildings
and
to
the
south
and
then
the
north.
Most
one
also
has
three
elements
with
the
middle
one
being
much
smaller.
That's
where
the
main
entry
to
the
building
is
and
where
the
amenity
space
would
be,
so
that
one
is
expressed
a
little
bit
different.
O
It
was
a
little
more
glass
which
actually
also
matches
they're,
both
the
building
to
the
north
and
the
building
to
the
south
have
a
larger
glass
entry
to
to
there.
So
so
that
was
kind
of
the
organization
kind
of
these
pairs
of
two
windows
that
define
one
of
the
bays
and
then
the
bays
are
pushed
back
and
forward
hey.
A
E
A
C
E
I'd
like
to
explore,
maybe
some
things
that
are
going
on
nearby
and
one
of
which
is
the
street
trees
on
that
section
of
sixth
east
or
our
epic
and
I
know
that
this
is
an
easy
project
to
stage
from
the
parking
lot
to
the
east.
You
can
probably
build
this
and
host
movies
at
the
same
time,
and
you
may
have
noticed
that
it's
a
movie
staging
area
I
think
it
would
be
good
when
you
come
back
to
be
specific
about
plans
to
protect
the
street
trees.
E
E
O
E
E
O
N
O
Do
you
have
it's
a
little
hard
to
tell
in
those
elevations,
but
we
do
have
if
you
did,
of
rendering
there
might
show
it
best,
some
planters
that
that
are
used
to
soften
that
transition.
So
you
have
kind
of
a
few
steps
and
a
few
more
steps.
Mm-Hmm
and
we'll
give
credit
for
that
one
to
likes
as
well
that
help
that
transition
between
the
between
the
podium
and
whether.
E
A
Know
David,
that's
an
interesting
point.
If
this
had
been
a
development
which
happened
over
time
with
individual
properties,
each
of
them
would
have
stepped
down
the
street
and
I
agree
with
the
there's.
A
nice
beauty
to
having
it
on
its
own
podium
level
out
there
to
make
actually
that
corner
unit
really
and
really
nice
and
be
slightly
set
up
above
I
would
to
wonder
if
there
might
be
some
stepping,
maybe
it's
just
in
the
landscaping
as
you
come
down
with
some
terraces
so
you're,
not
varying
your
floor
level.
Yeah.
A
E
A
Thing
this
leads
me
back
to
is
it?
Could
you
go
to
the
West
elevation,
please,
the
sixth
East
Street
elevation
and
talking
about
your
massing
and
how
it
relates,
I
think
you're
going
to
be
fine
on
this,
but
for
other
projects
we
have
requested
a
streetscape
showing
neighboring
properties,
so
we
could,
in
in
one
view,
take
a
look
at
Heights,
massing
proportions
and
things
so
we
see
how
it
really
relates
down
the
street.
G
N
A
N
N
Think
your
your
point
here
is
well
taken,
and
this
was
an
attempt
of
I
think
what
some
of
what
you're
saying
mr.
chair
and
also
Commissioner
Richardson.
But
there
is
a
setback
between
this
plane
of
this
landscape
area
and
then
the
actual
plane
where
the
patio
is
and
so
whether
that
perceptually
stepped
even
more
than
it
does.
But
the
idea
was
that
that
that
the
landscaping
there
would
help
create
a
softening
of
that
that
concrete,
Lex
and
others
commented
that
if
this
was
a
five-foot
concrete
plane,
it
would
fill
extremely
cold.
N
D
Masks
what
the
relationship
with
the
building
is
to
the
parking
lot
to
the
east
I
would
there's
the
fire
truck
turn
around
there
I
think
it
was
asked
earlier
there
was
going
to
be
access
from
7th
east,
but
it
appears
that
right
now
it's
just
kind
of
a
harsh
ending.
You
know
and
you're
just
transitioning
right
to
a
Stark
parking
lot
and.
N
Unfortunately,
we
are,
and
so
the
the
Masonic
Temple
utilizes
about
a
hundred
and
thirty
parking
stalls
several
times
throughout
the
year
and
so
currently
making
certain
they
still
had
that
parking
ability
was
absolutely
key
and
paramount
to
them.
Unfortunately,
the
economics
right
now
don't
don't
make
sense
to
integrate
it
into
a
parking
structure,
and
so
that's
really
what
this
is
utilized
for
I
can
tell
you.
N
Their
long-term
hope
is
that
this
can
all
this
too
can
become
a
revenue
generating
piece
of
property
with
the
redevelopment,
which
is
part
of
the
reason
creating
this
hammerhead
turn
around
for
fire
was
important
not
only
to
this
project,
but
also
this
future
project.
We
really
do
see
this
being
an
alley
long
long
term,
when
exactly
I
can't
answer
that,
but
yes
you're
right.
Unfortunately,
this
will
be
a
fairly
stark
surface
parking
lot
for
some
period
of
time.
Long.
E
N
N
N
E
I'd
like
to
channel
commissioner
Harding
for
a
moment
who
spoke
continually
about
making
balconies
useful
spaces
and
I
commend
you
for
having
balconies
that
are
at
least
five
feet
deep.
That's
enough
to
put
a
chair
and
walk
around
it
in
and
I
would
suggest
that
no
HVAC
be
allowed
on
balconies.
Absolutely.
N
N
Pool
no
so
this
is
it's
not
anticipated
to
be
a
pool,
we're
exploring
a
lot
of
other
active
and
passive
uses.
So
that's
a
that's
a
great
question
about
amenity
space,
so
we
are
exploring
this.
This
rooftop
patio
up
on
the
third
level
as
a
far
less
passive
or
far
less
active,
more
passive
space,
and
then
this
portion
of
the
donut
hole,
something
where
there
might
be
some
pergolas
trellises
outdoor
fire
pits
so
more
more
active
type
spaces.
N
Fire
pits
barbecues
that,
interestingly
enough,
one
of
the
the
police
departments
comment
was
get
as
much
activity
in
life
on
all
of
these.
With
this
pedestrian
mu
me
and
lighting,
so
lighting
makes
certain
we're
not
creating
light
pollution
for
the
neighbors
and/or,
the
residents
here,
but
enough
lighting
that
that
someone
would
feel
safe
and
engaged
by
that
space.
J
C
D
C
N
Of
the
one
of
the
things
that
this
is
in
it,
you
can
see
it
a
little
bit
in
here
on
top
of
the
parking
type
one
structure,
it
allows
us
to
create
kind
of
a
40
inch
40
to
48
inch
concrete
architectural
wall
to
create
a
more
private
space,
even
for
this
second
level
of
residential
units.
Next,
to
that
that
TPO,
but
I'm
a
valid
point
up
here,
looking
down
right.
B
O
G
N
N
So
right
now
the
the
intent
and
plan
is
that
this
is
a
market
rate
project,
so
we
have
not
anticipated
incorporating
affordable
housing.
One
of
the
things
that
we
do
believe
in
is
as
more
product
like
this
comes
on.
It
creates
opportunities
for
maybe
an
older
vintage
product
to
fill
part
of
an
affordable
housing
need.
F
Architecture
is
not
my
forte
I'm
here
representing
historicity
in
humanities,
and
I
was
just
looking
at
that
view
from
the
Northwest
bird's
eye
and
I
love
how
it
kind
of
echoes
the
other
building.
That's
a
little
more
terrorist
and
kind
of
gives
the
whole
block
a
real
cohesiveness,
like
I,
think
future
generations,
when
they're
preserving.
What
we're
doing
now
we'll
be
thankful
for
this.